identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
F800878F1C0D1D7E00A9280AFDC5F933.text	F800878F1C0D1D7E00A9280AFDC5F933.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lamprocoris (Lamprocoris) lateralis (Guérin-Méneville 1838) Guerin-Meneville 1838	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Lamprocoris (Lamprocoris) lateralis (Guérin-Méneville, 1838)</p>
            <p>(Figs 1–3)</p>
            <p> Scutellera lateralis Guérin-Méneville, 1838: 159 , 160. Syntypes: Indonesia: Java; MNHN.  Callidea contraria Walker, 1867: 30 . Holotype: “Hindostan” [= India]; BMNH. Synonymized by Distant 1899: 39.  Chrysophara formosana Matsumura, 1913: 109 , 110. Syntype (s): “ Formosa ” [= Taiwan]: “Arisan” [= Alishan]; EIHU! </p>
            <p>New synonymy.</p>
            <p> References. Dallas 1851: 28 (records); Dohrn 1859: 3 (list); Vollenhoven 1863: 32 (redescription, habitus, distribution); Mayr 1866: 18 (generic placement); Walker 1867: 28, 30 (records); Stål 1873: 22 (list, distribution); Atkinson 1887: 182 (redescription, distribution, record), 191 (  contraria , redescription); Lethierry &amp; Severin 1893: 28 (catalogue, distribution), 48 (  contraria , as of doubtful identity); Distant 1899: 39, 51 (list, synonymy); Distant 1901: 100 (records); Distant 1902: 63 (redescription, habitus, figures, distribution), Kirkaldy 1909: 301 (catalogue, distribution); * Matsumura 1913: 109 (  formosana , redescription, habitus); Paiva 1919: 351 (record); * Esaki 1926: 144 (formosanus, records); * China 1928: 186 (records, distribution); * Matsumura 1930: 104 (  formosana , redescription, habitus); * Matsumura 1931: 1179 (  formosana , redescription, habitus); * Esaki 1932: 1563 (formosanus, redescription, habitus); * Hoffmann 1935: 29 (formosanus, catalogue, distribution), 143 (catalogue, distribution); Tang 1935: 290 (catalogue, distribution); Kumar 1965: 44 (phallus); * Hsiao &amp; Zheng 1977: 62 (diagnosis, photo, figure, host plant, distribution); * Zhang &amp; Lin 1988: 84 (record, distribution); * Lin &amp; Zhang 1993: 113 (redescription, habitus, host plant, distribution); * Hua 2000: 168 (list, distribution, host plants); * Ho 2003: 206 (redescription, host plants, colour photo of adult and immatures); * Liu &amp; Wang 2004: 174 (record, host plant, distribution); * Göllner-Scheiding 2006: 197 (formosanus,  lateralis , catalogue, distribution). </p>
            <p> Type specimen of  Ch. formosana examined. LECTOTYPE (3), by present designation: “ Formosa \ Matsumura [printed] \\ &lt;Alishan&gt; [in Japanese script] \ 25/VI’09 [Matsumura’s handwriting]” [a single label with writing on both sides]; “ Type \ Matsumura” [red square, printed]; “  Chrysophara \  formosana \ n. sp. [Matsumura’s handwriting] \\ &lt;9&gt; [in Japanese script, handwritten in red]” [a single label with writing on both sides] (EIHU) (Figs. 1–3). </p>
            <p>Other specimens examined TAIWAN: Taipei County: “Taihoku” [= Taipei], 30. X. 1935, leg. R. Takahashi (1 Ƥ, TARI); “Urai” [= Wulai], 20. IV. 1930, leg. M. Chujo (1 Ƥ, TARI). Taoyuan County: Paling, 19. VII. 1969, leg. B.S. Chang (1 Ƥ, NMNS). Hsinchu County: Chingchuan, 21. XII. 1989, leg. C.C. Chiang &amp; K.W. Huang (2 ƤƤ, NMNS); “Shinchiku” [= Hsinchu], 1–30. VII. [19]18, J. Sonan &amp; K. Miyake (1 Ƥ, TARI). Ilan County: Nanao, 17. IX. 1992, leg. W.T. Yang (1 3, 1 Ƥ, NMNS); “Taiheizen” [= Taipingshan], 27. VIII. 1923, leg. T. Shiraki (1 Ƥ, TARI); “Doba” [= Tucheng], 14. X. 1937, leg. R. Takahashi (2 33, 4 ƤƤ, TARI); “Eboshiyama” [= Tulishan], 17–21. V. 1933, leg. M. Chujo (1 3, 1 Ƥ, TARI). Taichung County: “Kahodai” [= Chiapaotai], 1. VII. 1932. leg. M. Chujo (2 33, 4 ƤƤ, TARI); “Baibara” [= Meiyuan], 4–7. VII. 1939, leg. Y. Miwa (1 Ƥ, TARI); Taichung, VIII. 1957, leg. S.C. Chiu (1 3, TARI); Wushikan Forest Research Station, 3. VI. 1997, leg. C.W. &amp; L.B. O’Brien (2 33, 3 ƤƤ, NMNS); same locality, 27. X. 2003, leg. W.T. Yang (1 Ƥ, NMNS). Nantou County: Aowanda, 4. VIII. 1993, leg. J.Z. Ho (1 Ƥ, NMNS); “ChipChip” [= Chichi], [1]908, leg. H. Sauter (1 3, HNHM); “Takeyama” [= Chushan], 17. V. 1926, leg. J. Sonan (1 3, 1 Ƥ, TARI); “Naifunpo” [= Hsini], 9. IX. 1924, leg. T. Shiraki &amp; J. Sonan (2 ƤƤ, TARI); Nanshanchi, 12. VI. 1965, leg. B.S. Chang (1 Ƥ, NMNS); Puli, 15. IX. 1992, leg. J.Z. Ho (1 3, NMNS); “Hori” [= Puli], V–VII. 1947, leg. [T.C.] Maa, Chen &amp; Lin (2 33, 6 ƤƤ, TARI); “Rantaizan” [= Randaizan], 27. III. 1933 (1 Ƥ, TARI); Tungpu, 1200 m, 20–24. IV. 1982, leg. T. Lin &amp; K.C. Chou (1 Ƥ, TARI); “Musha” [= Wushe], 18. V–15. VI. 1919, leg. T. Okuni, J. Sonan, K. Miy[atake] &amp; M. Yosh[ino] (5 33, 10 ƤƤ, TARI). Chiayi County: “Arisan” [= Alishan], 2. V. 1917, leg. T. Shiraki (1 Ƥ, TARI); “Taihorinsho” [= Dalin], VIII. 1909, leg. H. Sauter (1 Ƥ, HNHM); “Taihorin” [= Dalin], IV. 1910, leg. H.Sauter (1 3, HNHM). Taitung County: “Taito” [= Taitung], 20. VIII. 1932 (1 Ƥ, TARI). Kaoshiung County: Alikang, VIII. [19]09, leg. H. Sauter (2 33, 3 ƤƤ, HNHM); “Kosempo” [= Chiasien], [1]908, leg. H. Sauter (1 3, 1 Ƥ, HNHM); same locality and collector, VII. 1909 (2 ƤƤ, HNHM); “Mt. Hoozan” [= Fengshan], III. 1910, leg. H. Sauter (1 3, HNHM). — LAOS: Champassak Prov., Dong Hua Xao NBCA, 2 km S of Ban Nong Luang, bank of Touay-Guai stream, 15°4’N 106°13’E, 800 m, swept, 1–5. IV. 1998, No. 23, leg. O. Merkl &amp; G. Csorba (1 Ƥ, HNHM); Hua Phan Prov., Ban Saluei, Phu Phan Mts., 20°15’N 104°02’E, 1500–2000 m, 20. IV–11. V. 2001, leg. D. Hauck (1 3, NHMW&gt; HNHM). — VIETNAM: Da Lat, Cam Ly area, rainforest, singled, 6. XII. 1994, No. 713, leg. S. Mahunka, Gy. Sziráki &amp; L. Zombori (1 Ƥ, HNHM). — INDONESIA: Sumatra: Deli, ex. coll. H. Fruhstorfer (1 Ƥ, HNHM); Java: unspecified locality, leg. [J.] Xántus (1 Ƥ, HNHM); Malang, collector unknown (2 ƤƤ, HNHM); “Java occident.” [= West Java], Pengalengan, 4000’, 1893, leg. H. Fruhstorfer (1 3, NHMW, genitalia dissected; 2 ƤƤ, HNHM); Bali: Bedugul Region, Tamblingan Lakes NR, 1200 m, XI. 2004, leg. S. Jakl (1 Ƥ, NHMW&gt; HNHM).</p>
            <p> Diagnosis. Within the nominotypical subgenus  Lamprocoris Stål, 1865 s. str.,  L. lateralis differs from  L. smaragdus Breddin, 1903 (Malaysia: Perak) by the presence of a wide marginal red stripe of the abdominal venter (Fig. 2), and from  L. roylii (Westwood, 1837) (Oriental Region) by its colour pattern (see e.g. Hsiao &amp; Zheng 1977: 62, 63, figs. 291, 292). The fourth species of  Lamprocoris s. str. ,  L. obtusus (Westwood, 1837) (Indonesia: Java) is a species incertae sedis; according to its brief original description and considering its type locality, it is almost certainly a junior synonym of  L. lateralis (see also Vollenhoven 1863: 32). </p>
            <p>Distribution. India; Bhutan; Myanmar; Laos!; Vietnam!; China: Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, Guizhou, Henan, Sichuan, Xizang, Yunnan; Taiwan!; Indonesia: Sumatra!, Java!, Bali! — New to the fauna of Laos and Vietnam.</p>
            <p> Discussion. A type specimen of  Ch. formosana (considered as a syntype under Recommendation 73F of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, 4th edition, and designated here as lectotype), deposited at EIHU, perfectly fitting the original description, was examined and found to be conspecific with  L. lateralis . Among several specimens of  L. lateralis , genitalia of a male from the terra typica (Java) were also examined and found to be identical with those of specimens from Taiwan. Consequently, we consider  Ch. formosana as a junior synonym of the latter species. </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F800878F1C0D1D7E00A9280AFDC5F933	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Tsai, Jing-Fu;Rédei, Dávid	Tsai, Jing-Fu, Rédei, Dávid (2009): The identity of jewel bugs described by Shonen Matsumura from Taiwan (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Scutelleridae). Zootaxa 2299: 44-52, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.275320
F800878F1C0E1D7800A92C0CFC39FA9C.text	F800878F1C0E1D7800A92C0CFC39FA9C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Chrysocoris (Fitha) fascialis (A. White 1842) A. White 1842	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Chrysocoris (Fitha) fascialis (A. White, 1842)</p>
            <p>(Figs 4–6)</p>
            <p> Callidea fascialis A. White, 1842: 86 . Syntype (s): “ Ind. Orient.?” [= East Indies?]; BMNH.  Chrysocoris fascialis var. venustria Kirkaldy, 1910: 110 . Holotype (Ƥ): China: Macao; USNM?  Lamprocoris giranensis Matsumura, 1913: 105 . Holotype (Ƥ): “ Formosa ” [= Taiwan]: “Giran” [= Ilan]; EIHU! New </p>
            <p>synonymy.</p>
            <p> References. Dallas 1851: 28 (records); Dohrn 1859: 2 (list); Stål 1873: 31 (list); Atkinson 1887: 189 (redescription, distribution); Lethierry &amp; Severin 1893: 26 (catalogue, distribution); Distant 1901: 100 (records); Distant 1902: 60 (redescription, distribution); Kirkaldy 1909: 293 (catalogue, distribution); Paiva 1907: 17 (list); * Esaki 1926: 145 (  fascialis ,  giranensis , records); * Matsumura 1930: 101 (  giranensis , redescription, habitus); * Matsumura 1931: 1184 (  giranensis , redescription, habitus); * Hoffmann 1935: 25, 161 (catalogue, distribution), 26, 161 (  fascialis var. venustria , catalogue, distribution), 29 (  giranensis , catalogue, distribution); * Chérot et al. 1998: 207 (feeding); * Ho 2003: 208 (  giranensis , redescription, host plant, colour photo of adult and nymph); * Göllner-Scheiding 2006: 195 (catalogue, distribution), 197 (  giranensis , catalogue, distribution). </p>
            <p> Type specimen of  L. giranensis examined. HOLOTYPE (Ƥ): “ Formosa \ Matsumura [printed] \\ 21/ XI.1906 \ Giran [Matsumura’s handwriting]” [a single label with writing on both sides]; “  Lamprocoris \ n. sp. \  giranensis \ &lt;kata-murasaki-kamemushi&gt; [= “purple-bodied bug”, in Japanese script, Matsumura’s handwriting]” [folded]; “  Lamprocoris \  giranensis \ n. sp. [Matsumura’s handwriting] \\ &lt;4&gt; [in Japanese script, handwritten in red]” [a single label with writing on both sides] (EIHU) (Figs. 4–6). </p>
            <p>Other specimens examined. TAIWAN: Ilan County: Suo, 14. VI. 1942, leg. R. Takahashi (1 Ƥ, TARI). Taichung County: Wushihkeng, 23. XII. 1993, leg. J.Z. Ho (1 3, NMNS); same locality and collector, 10. X. 1993 (1 Ƥ, NMNS). Nantou County: Aowanda, 4. VIII. 1993, leg. J.Z. Ho (1 3, NMNS); “ChipChip” [= Chichi], II. 1909, leg. H. Sauter (1 Ƥ, HNHM); Huisun, 5. XII. 1993, leg. C.R. Chen (1 Ƥ, NMNS); Meifeng, 18. V. 1965, leg. B.S. Chang (1 Ƥ, NMNS); “Horisha” [= Puli], V–VIII. [19]18, leg. H. Kawamura (1 3, TARI); “Fuhosho” [= Wucheng], VII. 1909, leg. H. Sauter (1 3, HNHM). Chiayi County: Near Mt. Ali, 7. IV. 1938, leg. Yoshino &amp; Yano (1 3, TARI). Kaoshiung County: “Kosempo” [= Chiasien], VII. [1]908, leg. H. Sauter (1 Ƥ, HNHM); same locality and collector, XI. [1]908 (1 3, HNHM); Shihshan Forest Road, 27–29 km, 20. XI. 2002, leg. W.T. Yang (1 Ƥ, NMNS). — INDIA: West Bengal: Darjeeling, collector unknown (1 3, HNHM).</p>
            <p> Diagnosis. Readily recognized within  Chrysocoris Hahn, 1834 by the medially deeply impressed anterior collar of the pronotum and the unique, complex colour pattern of the body (Figs. 4–5). </p>
            <p>Distribution. India!; Myanmar; Thailand; China (Macau); Taiwan!</p>
            <p> Discussion. The holotype of  L. giranensis , deposited at EIHU, perfectly fitting the original description, was examined and found to be clearly conspecific with a specimen of  L. fascialis from India. Consequently, we consider  L. giranensis as a junior synonym of the latter species. </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F800878F1C0E1D7800A92C0CFC39FA9C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Tsai, Jing-Fu;Rédei, Dávid	Tsai, Jing-Fu, Rédei, Dávid (2009): The identity of jewel bugs described by Shonen Matsumura from Taiwan (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Scutelleridae). Zootaxa 2299: 44-52, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.275320
F800878F1C081D7A00A92E6BFC19FF57.text	F800878F1C081D7A00A92E6BFC19FF57.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Poecilocoris druraei (Linnaeus 1771) Linnaeus 1771	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Poecilocoris druraei (Linnaeus, 1771)</p>
            <p>(Figs 7–9)</p>
            <p> Cimex druraei Linnaeus, 1771: 534 . For unnamed species in Drury 1770: 94. Syntype (s): China; lost. </p>
            <p> Cimex sanguineus Goeze, 1778: 231 . Junior objective synonym of  Cimex druraei Linnaeus, 1771 . Junior primary homonym of  Cimex sanguineus Schrank, 1776 . </p>
            <p> Poecilocoris obsoletus Dallas, 1848: 104 . Syntype (s) (3): China: Hong Kong; BMNH. Synonymized by Stål 1873: 12. </p>
            <p> Poecilocoris 15-guttatus [  quindecimguttatus ] Matsumura, 1913: 108. Syntype (s) (Ƥ): “Taihok” [= Cyuchih], “Horisha” [= Puli]; EIHU?. Synonymized by Esaki 1926: 144. </p>
            <p> Poecilocoris watanabei Matsumura, 1913: 106 , 107. Holotype (3): “ Formosa ” [= Taiwan]: “Hoppo” [= Peipu]; EIHU! New synonymy. </p>
            <p> References. Drury 1770: 94 (description, colour habitus); Fabricius 1775: 697 (diagnosis); Sulzer 1776: 95 (redescription, habitus); Fabricius 1781: 339 (diagnosis); Fabricius 1787: 281 (diagnosis); Gmelin 1790: 2129 (diagnosis); Stoll 1792: 109 (redescription, habitus); Fabricius 1794: 83 (diagnosis); Fabricius 1803: 132 (diagnosis); Burmeister 1834: 287 (diagnostic characters); Westwood 1837: 4 (listed); Germar 1839: 135 (diagnosis); Dallas 1848: 103 (redescription, habitus, variability), 104 (  obsoletus ); Dallas 1851: 12 (record); Dohrn 1859: 1 (list); Walker 1867: 8 (records); Stål 1873: 12 (list, distribution); Distant 1879: 44 (listed); Atkinson 1887: 153 (redescription, variability, distribution); Lethierry &amp; Severin 1893: 20 (catalogue, distribution); Distant 1901: 100 (records); * Distant 1902: 45 (redescription, variability, distribution); * Schouteden 1904: 21 (catalogue, distribution); Paiva 1907: 17 (list); Kirkaldy 1909: 305 (catalogue, distribution); * Kirkaldy 1910: 110 (list); * Shiraki 1913: 221 (redescription, biology, agricultural importance); * Maki 1916: 97 (redescription, biology, agricultural importance); * Esaki 1926: 144 (  druraei ,  watanabei , synonymy, records); * Matsumura 1930: 102 (  watanabei , redescription, habitus), 103 (15-guttatus, redescription, habitus); * Hoffmann 1931: 139 (record, host plant); * Matsumura 1931: 1187 (  watanabei , redescription, habitus); Hoffmann 1932a: 10 (list); * Hoffmann 1932b: 569 (habitus, distribution, host plant, development, preimaginal stages); * Hoffmann 1933: 435 (distribution); Wu 1933: 230 (catalogue, distribution); * Yang 1934: 261 (diagnosis, figure, variability, distribution); * Hoffmann 1935: 32, 164 (catalogue, distribution), 33 (  druraei var. obsoletus , catalogue, distribution), 35 (  watanabei , catalogue, distribution); * Tang 1935: 278 (catalogue, distribution); * Miwa 1943: 66 (listed, host plant); * Yang 1962: 36 (redescription, habitus, host plant, distribution); * Hsiao &amp; Zheng 1977: 59 (diagnosis, photo, figures, host plants, distribution); Ahmad &amp; Kamaluddin 1982: 261 (in key), 269 (redescription, habitus, genitalia, figures); Ahmad et al. 1994: 120 (morphology, phenetic analysis); Chen 1995: 20 (redescription, habitus, host plant, biology, distribution); * Hua 2000: 168 (list, distribution, host plants); * Bu et al. 2002: 245 (redescription, distribution); * Ho 2003: 200 (druriae [lapsus], redescription, host plants, colour photos); * Göllner-Scheiding 2006: 199 (catalogue, distribution). </p>
            <p> Type specimen of  P. watanabei examined. HOLOTYPE (3): “P. \  Watanabei \ n. sp. [Matsumura’s handwriting] \\ &lt;6&gt; [in Japanese script, handwritten in red]” [a single label with writing on both sides] (EIHU) (Figs. 7–9). </p>
            <p>Other specimens examined. TAIWAN: Taipei County: “Taihoku” [= Taipei], 16. VIII. 1925, leg. J. Sonan (1 3, TARI); same locality and collector, 20. IV. 1937 (1 3, TARI); same locality and collector, 21. IV. 1937 (6 33, TARI); same locality and collector, 21. VI. 1937 (1 3, TARI). Taoyuan County: “Heichin” [= Pingjhen], 20. V. 1930, leg. J. Sonan (1 3, TARI). Nantou County: Chitou, 13. VI. 1982, leg. J.Z. Ho (1 Ƥ, NMNS); Nanshanchi, 17. VI. 1965, leg. B.S. Chang (1 3, NMNS); “Horisha” [= Puli], V–VIII. [19]18, leg. H. Kawamura (1 Ƥ, TARI); “Musha” [= Wushe], 18. V–15. VI. 1919, leg. T. Okuni &amp; J. Sonan, K. Miy[atake] &amp; M. Yosh[ino] (5 Ƥ$, TARI). Kaohsiung County: “Mt. Hoozan” [= Fengshan], V. 1910, leg. H. Sauter (1 Ƥ, HNHM). — INDIA: Sikkim: Sikkim (2 33, 1 Ƥ, HNHM). — CHINA: Unspecified locality, leg. A. Nonfried, coll. K. Brancsik (1 3, HNHM); Yunnan: “Yun-nan-sen” [= Yunnansen] (1 3, HNHM).</p>
            <p> Diagnosis. Recognized within  Poecilocoris Dallas, 1848 by the combination of the following characters: body yellow to red, with yellow to black spots sometimes with metallic lustre; head uniformly black; pronotum with usually with 1+1 black spots of various size on disk, sometimes fully missing, invariably without black anterior and anterolateral margin; scutellum with 5 spots along basal margin, 1+1 spots in the middle of the anterior half, 2+2 spots arranged transversally slightly behind middle, and 1+1 spots behind middle of apical half, the spots are variously developed and strongly confluent in dark specimens. </p>
            <p>Distribution. India!: Sikkim!; Bhutan; Myanmar; Thailand; China!: Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, Guizhou, Hongkong, Hubei, Hunan, Jiangxi, Sichuan, Yunnan!, Zhejiang; Taiwan!</p>
            <p> Discussion. A specimen bearing only a handwritten label with the name  P. watanabei was received from EIHU. In contrary of the original description of that species, it is a male, however, we consider it as the holotype of  P. watanabei because of the following circumstances. (1) It perfectly fits the original description and figure of  P. watanabei (Matsumura 1913: 106, 107; pl. XII, fig. 6). (2) It bears an identification label in Matsumura’s handwriting having a red number “6” in Chinese character on the opposite side. As it was already noted by Tomokuni (1994), in Matsumura’s collection, such numbers in red apparently refer to the number of the illustration of the respective species in Thousand Insects of Japan, Additamenta I (cf. the labels of the types of  Chrysophara formosana and  Lamprocoris giranensis !). Consequently, it is justified to consider the specimen examined by us as the holotype, which was used for the preparation of the illustration accompanied the original description of  P. watanabei . Because the specimen clearly represents  P. druraei , we consider  P. watanabei as a junior synonym of the latter species. </p>
            <p> The redescription and photograph of Ho (2003: 198) under the name  P. watanabei is based on misidentification and represents another species of  Poecilocoris . </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F800878F1C081D7A00A92E6BFC19FF57	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Tsai, Jing-Fu;Rédei, Dávid	Tsai, Jing-Fu, Rédei, Dávid (2009): The identity of jewel bugs described by Shonen Matsumura from Taiwan (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Scutelleridae). Zootaxa 2299: 44-52, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.275320
