identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
46CBD00CFC405CBDA78292B7DCEDAA71.text	46CBD00CFC405CBDA78292B7DCEDAA71.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Mikeiinae Paretas-Martínez & Restrepo-Ortiz & Buffington & Pujade-Villar 2011	<div><p>Mikeiinae Paretas-Martinez &amp; Pujade-Villar subfam. n. Fig. 1</p> <p>Type genus:</p> <p>Mikeius Buffington, 2008.</p> <p>Diagnosis.</p> <p>Differs from Thrasorinae by the absence of a circumtorular impression (Fig. 1A; compare with Figs 2A, D, 3A, 4A, 9A-B), and the absence of a distinctly projected pronotal plate (Fig. 1C and G) (Table 2). Differs from Plectocynipinae by lacking an extremely long posterior metatibial spur (Fig. 6F; Ros-Farre and Pujade-Villar 2007), a laterally compressed metasoma in females (Ros-Farre and Pujade-Villar 2007), and a long, exposed hypopygium (7th sternite) in females (Ros-Farre and Pujade-Villar 2007). Differs from Euceroptrinae by lacking an areolet in the forewing, a lateral pronotal carinae (ARE, Fig. 6D; Buffington and Liljeblad 2008) and pronotal plate, having a complete ring of setae at the base of the metasoma and metasomal T4 much larger than T3. The Mikeiinae are unique among these three subfamilies in having two carinae in the median area of the pronotum that do not form a projected pronotal plate (Fig. 1G).</p> <p>Description.</p> <p>Length. 2 - 3.5 mm.</p> <p>Coloration. Head and mesosoma dark brown to black, antenna and legs yellowish to brown. Metasoma light brown to black.</p> <p>Head. (Fig. 1A) Frons and face with abundant setae. Transverse carinae or strigae on face absent. Clypeus distinctly projected ventrally, curved ventrally, clypeopleurostomal lines well developed. Malar furrow absent; malar space coriaceous, striate. Occiput and genae smooth without carinae. Circumtorular impression absent.</p> <p>Antenna. (Fig. 1D, E) Filiform or clavate with 10-11 flagellomeres in females (last one larger, possibly fusion of two), 12 in males. Males with F1 curved.</p> <p>Mesosoma. (Fig. 1B, C, F, G) Lateral margins of posterior part of pronotal plate short, not reaching scutum, not forming projected plate; lateral pronotal d epressions open laterally. Mesoscutum horizontally striate. Notauli complete, uniformly wide along entire length, or gently widening posteriorly. Parascutal sulcus marked only in basal half. Lateral basal impressions weak. Antero-admedian lines absent or weak. Median mesoscutal line present, short or long. Scutellum striate anteriorly and in center, rugose posteriorly; scutellar foveae round subtriangular or subquadrate, sometimes not delimited posteriorly; interfoveal carina absent. Mesopleural furrow absent or present. Propodeal carinae wide, almost straight. Pronotum, mesoscutum, scutellum, mesopleural triangle and metapleura all covered with sparse/dense setae.</p> <p>Forewing. Short setae present on wing surface and along margins. Radial cell closed along anterior margin, 2 to 2.5 times longer than wide, R2 almost straight; areolet absent.</p> <p>Legs. Metatibia with two spurs, sub-equal in length, not exceeding one-third the length of tarsomere 1.</p> <p>Metasoma. Base of T3 with a complete or incomplete ring of setae. Tergite 3 smaller than T4; T4 large, covering almost entire metasomal surface; remaining terga short, telescoped within T4; entire metasoma shiny and smooth.</p> <p>Comments.</p> <p>In the original description of Mikeius, Buffington (2008) erroneously described species of the genus as having 12 flagellomeres in the female antenna; the correct number is 10 or 11 (Fig. 1 D and E).</p> <p>Biology.</p> <p>Associated with Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera: Apocrita) that induce galls on species of Acacia (Fabaceae)and Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae), although most of these host records await verification through isolated rearing (Buffington, 2008).</p> <p>Distribution.</p> <p>Australia.</p> <p>Included genus.</p> <p>Mikeius Buffington, 2008.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/46CBD00CFC405CBDA78292B7DCEDAA71	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Paretas-Martinez, J.;Restrepo-Ortiz, C.;Buffington, M.;Pujade-Villar, J.	Paretas-Martinez, J., Restrepo-Ortiz, C., Buffington, M., Pujade-Villar, J. (2011): Systematics of Australian Thrasorinae (Hymenoptera, Cynipoidea, Figitidae) with descriptions of Mikeiinae, new subfamily, two new genera, and three new species. ZooKeys 108: 21-48, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.108.829, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.108.829
D00106D6B2A4DBA3E02EACC3B167F3B1.text	D00106D6B2A4DBA3E02EACC3B167F3B1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Mikeius clavatus Pujade-Villar & Restrepo-Ortiz 2011	<div><p>Mikeius clavatus Pujade-Villar &amp; Restrepo-Ortiz sp. n. Fig. 1E</p> <p>Diagnosis.</p> <p>Differs from all the other species of Mikeius in having the antenna strongly clavate with the six terminal segments 1.5 times wider than previous segments (Fig. 1E); further distinguished from Mikeius berryi and Mikeius grandawi by the absence of a mesopleural carina.</p> <p>Description.</p> <p>As in subfamily description (see above) with the following specific characters.</p> <p>Length. Female 2.8 - 3 mm. Male unknown.</p> <p>Coloration. Head and mesosoma black, antenna yellowish, except scape, brown, metasoma pale brown. Legs pale yellow, except coxae, brown.</p> <p>Antenna. (Fig. 1E) Female. Strongly clavate, 11 flagellomeres, antennal formula: 8(4): 4(4): 5(3): 3(3): 3(3): 3(3.5): 4(5): 5(6): 5(6): 6(5): 5(6): 5(6): 7(4). Placoid sensillae from F7 to terminal segment.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Mesoscutum slightly striate. Notauli complete of uniform width. Antero-admedian lines weak. Median mesoscutal line very short. Scutellar foveae round to subquadrate, not delimited posteriorly. Mesopleural furrow absent.</p> <p>Forewing. Radial cell 2.4 times longer than wide.</p> <p>Metasoma. Base of T3 with an almost complete hairy ring.</p> <p>Type material.</p> <p>HOLOTYPE ♀ (ANIC) with the following label data: "AUSTRALIA: Vict. Mt. Donna Buang, 1200m 11-17.i. 80, Eucalyptus-Nothofagus forest, A. Newton, M. Thayer" (white label), "flight intercept window/trough trap" (white label), "AUST. NAT. INS. COLL." (green label), "Holotype Mikeius clavatus P-V &amp; R-O" (red label). PARATYPE ♀ (ANIC) with the following labels: "W sid e Cobungra Hill 20km WbyN, Omeo Vic. 27 Feb. 1980, I.D. Naumann J. C. Cardale" (white label), "ex alcohol collection" (white label), "AUST. NAT. INS. COLL." (green label), "Paratype Mikeius clavatus P-V &amp; R-O" (red label).</p> <p>Biology.</p> <p>Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution.</p> <p>Victoria, Australia.</p> <p>Etymology.</p> <p>The specific name refers to the strongly clavate antenna.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D00106D6B2A4DBA3E02EACC3B167F3B1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Paretas-Martinez, J.;Restrepo-Ortiz, C.;Buffington, M.;Pujade-Villar, J.	Paretas-Martinez, J., Restrepo-Ortiz, C., Buffington, M., Pujade-Villar, J. (2011): Systematics of Australian Thrasorinae (Hymenoptera, Cynipoidea, Figitidae) with descriptions of Mikeiinae, new subfamily, two new genera, and three new species. ZooKeys 108: 21-48, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.108.829, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.108.829
5D02B6E4273E5263B95B462AAB57366E.text	5D02B6E4273E5263B95B462AAB57366E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Thrasorinae Paretas-Martínez & Restrepo-Ortiz & Buffington & Pujade-Villar 2011	<div><p>Thrasorinae Kovalev, 1994 Figs 2 3 4 9</p> <p>Type genus:</p> <p>Thrasorus Weld, 1944.</p> <p>Diagnosis.</p> <p>Distinguished from other figitids by the presence of a circumtorular impression (Figs 2A, D, 3A, 4A, 9A, B) (Table 2); further distinguished from Euceroptrinae by the absence of an areolet in the forewing and the absence of a lateral pronotal carina. Additional characters that distinguish Thrasorinae from other Figitidae can be found in the key to subfamilies below.</p> <p>Comments.</p> <p>In the redescription of Thrasorus, Buffington (2008) erroneously described species of the genus as having 12 flagellomeres in the female antenna; the correct number is 11.</p> <p>Biology.</p> <p>Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution.</p> <p>Australia, South America and North America.</p> <p>Included genera:</p> <p>Cicatrix, gen. n.; Myrtopsen Rübsaamen, 1908; Palmiriella, gen. n., Scutimica Ros-Farré, 2007; Thrasorus Weld, 1944.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5D02B6E4273E5263B95B462AAB57366E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Paretas-Martinez, J.;Restrepo-Ortiz, C.;Buffington, M.;Pujade-Villar, J.	Paretas-Martinez, J., Restrepo-Ortiz, C., Buffington, M., Pujade-Villar, J. (2011): Systematics of Australian Thrasorinae (Hymenoptera, Cynipoidea, Figitidae) with descriptions of Mikeiinae, new subfamily, two new genera, and three new species. ZooKeys 108: 21-48, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.108.829, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.108.829
00D4FF9577BC5D859E14FF70835E2450.text	00D4FF9577BC5D859E14FF70835E2450.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cicatrix Paretas-Martinez 2011	<div><p>Cicatrix Paretas-Martinez gen. n. Fig. 2</p> <p>Type species:</p> <p>Cicatrix pilosiscutum (Girault), comb. n.</p> <p>Included species:</p> <p>Cicatrix neumannoides, sp. n., Cicatrix pilosiscutum (Girault), Cicatrix shauffi (Buffington), comb. n.</p> <p>Diagnosis.</p> <p>(Table 2) Cicatrix, gen. n., is distinguished from Myrtopsen, Palmiriella, gen. n., and Scutimica by having T3 and T4 as separate sclerites (Fig. 2C); in these latter three genera, T3 and T4 are fused into a syntergum (Fig. 3F, 9C). Cicatrix is distinguished from Thrasorus having horizontally striate microsculpture on the mesoscutum (Fig. 2B, E); Thrasorus has a smooth mesoscutum (Fig. 4B).</p> <p>Description.</p> <p>Length. Female2.5 - 4.5 mm.Male unknown.</p> <p>Coloration. The entire body with the same coloration, light brown or chestnut depending on the specimen.</p> <p>Head (Fig. 2A, D). Face and frons with abundant setae. Face with transverse carinae, strong across entire face, or only marked at lateral sides of face, smoother, tending towards strigae. Clypeus distinctly projected anteriorly, curved ventrally, clypeopleurostomal lines well developed. Malar furrow coriaceous. Occiput and genae smooth without carinae. Circumtorular impression present.</p> <p>Antennae (Fig. 2F). Female. Filiform, with 10 or 11 flagellomeres.</p> <p>Mesosoma (Fig. 2B and E). Pronotal carinae reaching anterior margin of mesoscutum, forming small plate, conspicuous but not projected, concave dorsomedially. Mesoscutum horizontally striate. Notauli complete, of uniform width to slightly wider posteriorly. Parascutal sulcus wide only in basal half. Lateral basal impressions conspicuous. Antero-admedian lines weak. Median mesoscutal line absent, short or long. Scutellum rugose; scutellar foveae round, subtriangular or subquadrate; interfoveal carina absent. Mesopleural furrow conspicuous. Propodeal carinae wide, curved. Pronotum, mesoscutum, scutellum, mesopleural triangle and metapleura all covered with sparse/dense setae.</p> <p>Forewing. Short setae present on wing surface and along margins. Radial cell closed along anterior margin, two times longer than wide, R2 almost straight; areolet absent.</p> <p>Legs. Metatibia with two spurs, sub-equal in length, not exceeding one-half length of tarsomere 1.</p> <p>Metasoma (Fig. 2C). Petiole short. Base of T3 with patches of setae or an almost complete hairy ring. Tergite 3 smaller than T4; T4 four large, covering almost entire metasomal surface; remaining terga short, telescoped within T4; entire metasoma shiny, smooth. Hypopygium and ventral spine visible.</p> <p>Biology.</p> <p>Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution.</p> <p>Australia.</p> <p>Etymology.</p> <p>From the Latin word cicatrix, meaning “scar”, refering to the carinae that resemble a scar through the face. Gender is masculine.</p> <p>Taxonomic comments.</p> <p>Girault (1929) described Amblynotus pilosiscutum, and Weld (1952) transferred the species to Melanips. This species has the circumtorular impression and thus belongs to Thrasorinae. However, the results of the phylogenetic analysis and the diagnostic characters summarized above indicate that this species cannot be accommodated by any currently recognized genus, thus we describe Cicatrix, gen. n., to contain Cicatrix pilosiscutum (Girault) as well as Cicatrix neumannoides, sp. n., and Cicatrix schauffi (Buffington), comb. n.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/00D4FF9577BC5D859E14FF70835E2450	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Paretas-Martinez, J.;Restrepo-Ortiz, C.;Buffington, M.;Pujade-Villar, J.	Paretas-Martinez, J., Restrepo-Ortiz, C., Buffington, M., Pujade-Villar, J. (2011): Systematics of Australian Thrasorinae (Hymenoptera, Cynipoidea, Figitidae) with descriptions of Mikeiinae, new subfamily, two new genera, and three new species. ZooKeys 108: 21-48, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.108.829, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.108.829
7CD819D6C400C1B8066921139BED9B63.text	7CD819D6C400C1B8066921139BED9B63.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cicatrix pilosiscutum (Paretas-Martínez & Restrepo-Ortiz & Buffington & Pujade-Villar 2011) Paretas-Martínez & Restrepo-Ortiz & Buffington & Pujade-Villar 2011	<div><p>Cicatrix pilosiscutum (Girault) comb. n. Fig. 2A</p> <p>Amblynotus pilosiscutum Girault, 1929</p> <p>Melanips pilosiscutum (Girault) Weld, 1952</p> <p>Diagnosis.</p> <p>Differs from Cicatrix neumannoides and Cicatrix schauffi by having female antenna with 11 flagellomeres (these two species having female antenna with 10 flagellomeres, (Fig. 2F, Cicatrix schauffi)), much stronger carinae crossing the entire face (Fig. 2A) (only marked at lateral sides of the face in the other two species, and being smoother, more like strigae), and by lacking a median mesoscutal impression (present and long in Cicatrix schauffi comb. n. (Fig. 2B), short in Cicatrix neumannoides sp. n. (Fig. 2E)).</p> <p>Redescription.</p> <p>As in generic description (see above) with the following specific characters: Length. Female 4.4 mm. Male unknown.</p> <p>Coloration. Completely light brown except mesosoma, which is dorsally dark.</p> <p>Head. (Fig. 2A) Frons and face with piliferous punctures; strong transverse carinae crossing the entire face.</p> <p>Antenna. Female. 11 flagellomeres, antennal formula: 9(4): 5(3): 10(3): 9(2.5): 8.5(2.5): 8(3): 8(3): 8(3): 7(3): 5(3): 5(3): 4.5(3): 7.5(3). Placoid sensillae absent on basal half of F1 to F4, scarce on dorsal half; abundant from F5 to F11.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Median mesoscutal impression absent. Scutellar foveae subtriangular.</p> <p>Type material.</p> <p>HOLOTYPE ♀ (QM) with the following labels: "25. 10. 23, National Pk., Q. H. Hacker." (white label), “HOLOTYPE” (pink label), " Amblynotus pilosiscutum ♀, Type Girault" (white label, handwritten), " Xyalophoroides pilosiscutum (Gir), E. F. Riek det 1953" (white label, handwritten), QM Reg. No. T99348" (yellow label), " Cicatrix pilosiscutum P-M det-2009" (white label).</p> <p>Biology.</p> <p>Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution.</p> <p>Australia. Label data suggest the single specimen was taken in Royal National Park in Sydney.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7CD819D6C400C1B8066921139BED9B63	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Paretas-Martinez, J.;Restrepo-Ortiz, C.;Buffington, M.;Pujade-Villar, J.	Paretas-Martinez, J., Restrepo-Ortiz, C., Buffington, M., Pujade-Villar, J. (2011): Systematics of Australian Thrasorinae (Hymenoptera, Cynipoidea, Figitidae) with descriptions of Mikeiinae, new subfamily, two new genera, and three new species. ZooKeys 108: 21-48, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.108.829, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.108.829
F6749F07C4261E303E67579B50A21C24.text	F6749F07C4261E303E67579B50A21C24.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cicatrix schauffi (Paretas-Martínez & Restrepo-Ortiz & Buffington & Pujade-Villar 2011) Paretas-Martínez & Restrepo-Ortiz & Buffington & Pujade-Villar 2011	<div><p>Cicatrix schauffi (Buffington) comb. n. Fig. 2B-D and F</p> <p>Mikeius schauffi Buffington, 2008.</p> <p>Diagnosis.</p> <p>Similar to Cicatrix neumannoides, sp. n., in having female antenna with 10 flagellomeres (Fig. 2F) and a face horizontally striate only on the lateral areas (Fig. 2D) (Cicatrix pilosiscutum, comb. n., has female antenna with 11 flagellomeres and much stronger carinae crossing the entire face), but differs from Cicatrix neumannoides sp. n. by having a long median mesoscutal impression and subtriangular scutellar foveae (Fig. 2B).</p> <p>Redescription.</p> <p>As in generic description (see above) with the following specific characters: Length. Female: 3.9 mm. Male unknown.</p> <p>Coloration. Completely light brown.</p> <p>Head. (Fig. 2D) Frons with piliferous punctures, face horizontally striate only on lateral areas.</p> <p>Antenna. (Fig. 2F) Female. 10 flagellomeres, antennal formula: 6(2): 4(3): 5(3): 4(3): 4(3): 4.2(3.1): 4.2(3.1): 4.3(3.3): 5.2(3.3): 4.6(3.3): 3.5(3.3): 6(4). Placoid sensillae present from F4, abundant from F6 through terminal segment.</p> <p>Mesosoma. (Fig. 2B) Median mesoscutal impression long, one-third length of scutum. Scutellar foveae irregular, subquadrate and not delimited posteriorly.</p> <p>Type material. HOLOTYPE ♀ (ANIC) with the following label data: "23.36S 133.35E 32 km WNW of Alice Springs, NT 8 Oct. 1978 J:C: Cardale" (white label), "ex alcohol collection" (white label), "AUST. NAT. INS. COLL." (green label). "HOLOTYPE, Mikeius schauffi, Buffington" (red label), " Cicatrix schauffi P-M det-2009" (white label).</p> <p>Biology.</p> <p>Unknown</p> <p>Distribution.</p> <p>Central Australia.</p> <p>Taxonomic comments.</p> <p>The circumtorular impression present in this species indicates that it belongs in Thrasorinae, not in Mikeiinae. We transfer this species to Cicatrix gen. n., because it possesses all the diagnostic characters of that genus.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F6749F07C4261E303E67579B50A21C24	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Paretas-Martinez, J.;Restrepo-Ortiz, C.;Buffington, M.;Pujade-Villar, J.	Paretas-Martinez, J., Restrepo-Ortiz, C., Buffington, M., Pujade-Villar, J. (2011): Systematics of Australian Thrasorinae (Hymenoptera, Cynipoidea, Figitidae) with descriptions of Mikeiinae, new subfamily, two new genera, and three new species. ZooKeys 108: 21-48, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.108.829, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.108.829
660DDD5E11B3536B8D3816CF543D62FA.text	660DDD5E11B3536B8D3816CF543D62FA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cicatrix neumannoides Paretas-Martinez & Restrepo-Ortiz 2011	<div><p>Cicatrix neumannoides Paretas-Martinez &amp; Restrepo-Ortiz sp. n. Fig. 2E</p> <p>Diagnosis.</p> <p>Similar to Cicatrix schauffi, comb. n., having female antenna with 10 flagellomeres and a face with horizontal strigae only on the lateral areas (Cicatrix pilosiscutum comb. n. has female antenna with 11 flagellomeres and much stronger carinae crossing the entire face), but differs from Cicatrix schauffi comb. n. by having short median mesoscutal impression and rounded scutellar foveae (Fig. 2E).</p> <p>Description.</p> <p>As in generic description (see above) with the following specific characters.</p> <p>Length. Female: 2.9 to 3.0 mm. Male unknown.</p> <p>Coloration. Shiny chestnut, scutum darker in center.</p> <p>Head. Frons and face with piliferous punctures; face with a few carinae from internal margin of eye reaching center of face.</p> <p>Antenna. Female. 10 flagellomeres, antennal formula: 6(2): 4(2.8): 6(2.5): 4.1(2.8): 4.1(2.8): 4(3): 4(3): 4(3): 4.8(3.1): 3.8(3.3): 3.5(3.3): 5.6(4). Placoid sensillae starting from F4, F4 to F6 are scarce, abundant from F7-F10.</p> <p>Mesosoma. (Fig. 2E) Median mesoscutal impression short, only indicated basally, not reaching one-fifth length of scutum. Scutellar foveae rounded.</p> <p>Etymology.</p> <p>The specific name neumannoides means "related to neumanni", referring to the fact that the specimens used to describe this species were previously included in the type series of Mikeius neumanni.</p> <p>Type material.</p> <p>HOLOTYPE ♀ (ANIC) with the following labels: "AUSTRALIA: NSW Peak Hill Range, Braidwood, Cooma Road, At top of pass. 30 December 1994. A. Sundholm &amp; R de keyzer. On Acacia dealbata " (white label), "AUST. NAT. INS. COLL." (green label), " Mikeius neumanni Det. M. L. Buffington 2008 " (white label), "Holotype Cicatrix neumannoides P-M &amp; R-O" (red label)". PARATYPE ♀ (ANIC) with the following labels: "Crowea St. For. nr Pemberton W.A. Nov.-Dec. 1978 S.J. Curry Malaise trap open forest" (white label), "AUST. NAT. INS. COLL." (green label), "Paratype Cicatrix neumannoides P-M &amp; R-O" (red label)".</p> <p>Biology.</p> <p>Unknown; label data suggests an association with Acacia.</p> <p>Distribution.</p> <p>New South Wales and Western Australia, Australia.</p> <p>Taxonomic comments.</p> <p>Although Buffington (2008) recognized two specimens of Mikeius neumanni in the collection at ANIC, he used only one specimen in his description of the taxon, designating it as the holotype. The species neumanni (based on the holotype) is transferred to Palmiriella, gen. n., below, and the second specimen, in addition to another specimen discovered in ANIC, belongs to Cicatrix.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/660DDD5E11B3536B8D3816CF543D62FA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Paretas-Martinez, J.;Restrepo-Ortiz, C.;Buffington, M.;Pujade-Villar, J.	Paretas-Martinez, J., Restrepo-Ortiz, C., Buffington, M., Pujade-Villar, J. (2011): Systematics of Australian Thrasorinae (Hymenoptera, Cynipoidea, Figitidae) with descriptions of Mikeiinae, new subfamily, two new genera, and three new species. ZooKeys 108: 21-48, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.108.829, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.108.829
85D403B7CB8A51F4BF4AB3C308C04B66.text	85D403B7CB8A51F4BF4AB3C308C04B66.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Palmiriella Pujade-Villar & Paretas-Martinez 2011	<div><p>Palmiriella Pujade-Villar &amp; Paretas-Martinez gen. n. Fig. 3</p> <p>Type species:</p> <p>Palmiriella neumanni (Buffington), comb. n., by present designation and monotypy.</p> <p>Diagnosis.</p> <p>(Table 2) Palmiriella, gen. n., can be distinguished from other thrasorines by having the face smooth, without any sculpturing (Fig. 3A); in Scutimica and Myrtopsen, the face is irregularly sculptured (Fig. 9A, B); in Cicatrix and Thrasorus, strong transverse carinae are present crossing the entire face or on lateral areas (Fig. 3A, D, 4A). Palmiriella is further differentiated from other thrasorines by having metasomal T3 and T4 fused into a syntergum, but not covering the entire metasomal surface (Fig. 3F); in Scutimica and Myrtopsen, a syntergum covering the entire metasomal surface is present (Fig. 9C); in Cicatrix and Thrasorus, T3 and T4 are separate sclerites (syntergum absent) (Fig. 2C, 4F). Additionally, Palmiriella is distinguished from Scutimica and Myrtopsen by having the scutellum posteriorly rounded (Scutimica and Myrtopsen have an emarginate/truncate scutellum, Fig. 9D, E), and pronotum not sculptured nor projected (strongly carinate and projected in Scutimica (Fig. 9F), with microsculpture or carinate in Myrtopsen (Fig. 9G)); from Thrasorus by having horizontally striate microsculpture on the mesoscutum (Fig. 3B) (mesoscutum smooth in Thrasorus, Fig. 4B).</p> <p>Description.</p> <p>See description, biology and distribution of type species below.</p> <p>Etymology.</p> <p>The new genus is dedicated to our colleague and good friend Palmira Ros-Farré, who has helped us for many years with our little wasps. Gender is feminine.</p> <p>Taxonomic comments.</p> <p>The holotype of Mikeius neumanni Buffington, unlike the other species included in Mikeius, does have the circumtorular impression diagnostic for Thrasorinae. For this reason, this species is transferred from Mikeius to the new thrasorine genus Palmiriella. Characters summarized in the diagnosis below and phylogeny in Fig. 5 justify the erection of the new genus.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/85D403B7CB8A51F4BF4AB3C308C04B66	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Paretas-Martinez, J.;Restrepo-Ortiz, C.;Buffington, M.;Pujade-Villar, J.	Paretas-Martinez, J., Restrepo-Ortiz, C., Buffington, M., Pujade-Villar, J. (2011): Systematics of Australian Thrasorinae (Hymenoptera, Cynipoidea, Figitidae) with descriptions of Mikeiinae, new subfamily, two new genera, and three new species. ZooKeys 108: 21-48, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.108.829, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.108.829
76EF1B1E5FDC4188F0FF4FEDEB17EC9B.text	76EF1B1E5FDC4188F0FF4FEDEB17EC9B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Palmiriella neumanni (Paretas-Martínez & Restrepo-Ortiz & Buffington & Pujade-Villar 2011) Paretas-Martínez & Restrepo-Ortiz & Buffington & Pujade-Villar 2011	<div><p>Palmiriella neumanni (Buffington) comb. n. Fig. 3A-F</p> <p>Mikeius neumanni Buffington, 2008.</p> <p>Description.</p> <p>Length. Female 3.2 mm. Male unknown.</p> <p>Coloration. Head and mesosoma black, antennae yellowish except scape, brown, metasoma medium brown. Legs light yellow except tibia and metatarsi, brown.</p> <p>Head (Fig. 3A, F). Frons and face with piliferous punctures and abundant setae. No transverse carinae or strigae on face. Clypeus distinctly projected anteriorly, curved ventrally, clypeopleurostomal lines well developed. Malar space with conspicuous, coriaceous, striate band. Vertex in dorsal view with small piliferous punctures. Occiput and genae smooth without carinae. Circumtorular impression present.</p> <p>Antenna (Fig. 3D). Female. 11 flagellomeres; antennal formula: 7(4): 4(4): 4(3): 4.5(3): 4.5(3): 4.5(3): 4(3): 4(3): 4(3): 3(3): 3(3): 3(3): 5(4). Placoid sensillae from F7 to terminal segment.</p> <p>Mesosoma (Fig. 3B, C, E). Pronotal carinae reaching scutum, forming small plate, conspicuous but not projected, concave dorsomedially. Mesoscutum horizontally striate. Notauli complete of uniform width. Parascutal sulcus wide only in basal half. Lateral basal impression conspicuous. Antero-admedian lines weak, reaching anterior one-third of mesoscutum. Median mesoscutal impression short and weak. Scutellum rugose; scutellar foveae triangular; interfoveal carina absent. Mesopleural furrow present. Propodeal carinae present. Pronotum, mesoscutum, scutellum, mesopleural triangle and metapleura all covered with sparse/dense setae.</p> <p>Forewing. Short setae present on wing surface and along margins. Radial cell closed, 2.3 times longer than wide; R2 almost straight, basal vein distally widening; areolet absent.</p> <p>Legs. Metatibia with two spurs, sub-equal in length, not exceeding one-half length of tarsomere 1.</p> <p>Metasoma (Fig. 3F). Petiole very short, almost not visible. T3 and T4 fused into a syntergum, not covering the entire metasomal surface; remaining terga short, telescoped within T4; entire metasoma shiny and smooth. Hypopygium and ventral spine visible. Base of syntergum with only some scattered setae.</p> <p>Type material.</p> <p>HOLOTYPE ♀ (ANIC) with the following labels: "Mt Nebo, S. E. Qld, 24. Xi. 1970, S. R. Monteith" (white label), "AUST. NAT. INS. COLL." (green label). "HOLOTYPE, Mikeius neumanni, Buffington" (red label), " Palmiriella neumanni P-V &amp; P-M det-2009" (white label).</p> <p>Biology.</p> <p>Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution.</p> <p>Queensland, Australia.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/76EF1B1E5FDC4188F0FF4FEDEB17EC9B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Paretas-Martinez, J.;Restrepo-Ortiz, C.;Buffington, M.;Pujade-Villar, J.	Paretas-Martinez, J., Restrepo-Ortiz, C., Buffington, M., Pujade-Villar, J. (2011): Systematics of Australian Thrasorinae (Hymenoptera, Cynipoidea, Figitidae) with descriptions of Mikeiinae, new subfamily, two new genera, and three new species. ZooKeys 108: 21-48, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.108.829, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.108.829
FC0CF81E28B174D700E16EBA51F5412D.text	FC0CF81E28B174D700E16EBA51F5412D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Thrasorus Weld 1944	<div><p>Thrasorus Weld, 1944 Fig. 4</p> <p>Type species:</p> <p>Thrasorus pilosus Weld, 1944.</p> <p>Included species:</p> <p>Thrasorus pilosus Weld, Thrasorus rieki, sp. n., Thrasorus schmitdae Buffington.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FC0CF81E28B174D700E16EBA51F5412D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Paretas-Martinez, J.;Restrepo-Ortiz, C.;Buffington, M.;Pujade-Villar, J.	Paretas-Martinez, J., Restrepo-Ortiz, C., Buffington, M., Pujade-Villar, J. (2011): Systematics of Australian Thrasorinae (Hymenoptera, Cynipoidea, Figitidae) with descriptions of Mikeiinae, new subfamily, two new genera, and three new species. ZooKeys 108: 21-48, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.108.829, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.108.829
83074C36E43B5BE0A882948354FA6916.text	83074C36E43B5BE0A882948354FA6916.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Thrasorus rieki Paretas-Martinez & Pujade-Villar 2011	<div><p>Thrasorus rieki Paretas-Martinez &amp; Pujade-Villar sp. n. Fig. 4B</p> <p>Diagnosis.</p> <p>Differs from other species of Thrasorus by having small scutellar foveae not clearly defined in posterior margin (Fig. 4B); other species of Thrasorus have scutellar foveae clearly delimited in the entire circumference (Fig. 4D). Further differs from other Thrasorus species by having a well-defined median mesoscutal impression (arrow, Fig. 4B); in other Thrasorus, the impression is not present, or at most, a very small incision can be seen (Fig. 4D).</p> <p>Description.</p> <p>Length. Female: 3.0-3.2 mm; males: 3.2-3.3 mm.</p> <p>Coloration. Head and mesosoma black, antennae brown, and metasoma pale brown. Legs pale yellow except coxae, brown.</p> <p>Head. (Fig. 4A) Frons and face with abundant setae and piliferous punctures; space between clypeus and compound eye with carinae. Malar furrow conspicuous, coriaceous and striate. Occiput smooth; genae with strong striae. Vertex in dorsal view with small piliferous punctures. Circumtorular impression present.</p> <p>Antenna. Female. (Fig. 4G) 11 flagellomeres, antennal formula: 6(3): 2(2): 5(2): 4(2): 4(3): 4(3): 4(3): 4(3): 4(3): 3(3): 3(3): 3(3): 5(4). Placoid sensillae from F4 to terminal segment. Male. (Fig. 4C) 12 flagellomeres, antennal formula: 7(3): 3(2): 5(2): 4(3): 4(3): 4(3): 4(3): 4(3): 4(3): 4(3): 4(3): 4(3): 4(3): 5(3). Placoid sensillae starting from F1.</p> <p>Mesosoma (Fig. 4B, E). Lateral margins of pronotal plate reaching the scutum, forming a small plate conspicuous but not projected, concave dorsomedially, with piliferous punctures. Mesoscutum smooth and shiny, with piliferous punctures. Notauli complete, very narrow anteriorly and much wider posteriorly. Parascutal sulcus wide only in basal half. Lateral basal impressions weak. Antero-admedian lines very weak. Median mesoscutal impression well defined but not clearly delimited anteriorly. Scutellum smooth on anterior falf and centre, rugose posteriorly; scutellar foveae small subtriangular, not clearly delimited posteriorly; interfoveal carina absent. Mesopleural furrow present but not conspicuous. Propodeal carinae present. Pronotum, mesoscutum, scutellum, mesopleural triangle and metapleura not very pubescent, only some sparse setae.</p> <p>Forewing. Short setae present on wing surface and along margins. Radial cell closed, 1.9 times longer than wide; R2 almost straight; areolet absent.</p> <p>Legs. Metatibia with two spurs, sub-equal in length, not exceeding one-half length of tarsomere 1.</p> <p>Metasoma. (Fig. 4F) Petiole short. Base of T3 with an almost complete hairy ring. Tergite 3 smaller than T4; T4 four large, covering almost entire metasomal surface; remaining terga short, telescoped within T4; entire metasoma shiny and smooth.</p> <p>Material examined.</p> <p>HOLOTYPE ♀ (ANIC; marked by a red spot, on a pinned card with six other specimens of the same taxon) with the following labels: "Out of large galls on mullee acacia On 18-1-16" (handwritten below the label with the insects), "Thrasorus berlesei (Grlt) Riek det" (white label, handwritten), "sp 7 (berlesei) det ML Buffington 2006" (white label), "Holotype Thrasorus rieki P-M &amp; P-V det-2009" (red label). PARATYPES: 4 ♂ and 1 ♀ (on the same pinned card as the holotype) with the same data as the holotype, "Paratype Thrasorus rieki P-M &amp; P-V det-2009" (red label); 1 ♂ and 5 ♀ (ANIC) (on a pinned card together with 6 Chalcidoidea specimens) with the following labels: "Out of Acacia galls ???? 19.1.16 QLD" (handwritten below the label with the insects), "AUST. NAT. INS. COLL." (green label), "Paratype Thrasorus rieki P-M &amp; P-V det-2009" (red label); 1 ♀ (QM) with the following labels: "Amblynotus berlesei ♀ Girault types" (white label handwritten), " HOLOTYPE" (pink label), "Thrasorus berlesei (Gir) EF Riek det 1953" (white label handwritten), "QM reg. No. T99347" (yellow label), "Paratype Thrasorus rieki P-M &amp; P-V det-2009" (red label).</p> <p>Biology.</p> <p>Unknown host on Acacia galls (based on label data).</p> <p>Distribution.</p> <p>Australia, Queensland.</p> <p>Etymology.</p> <p>Named after E.F. Riek, who worked before us on Australian Cynipoidea.</p> <p>Taxonomic comments.</p> <p>In the QM, there is one specimen labelled as ' Amblynotus berlesei ' by Girault. In ANIC, there are six specimens on one large card with a determination label placed by Riek, stating that taxon is ' Thrasorus berlesei (Grlt)'. But as Buffington (2008) pointed out, this species was never published by Girault nor Riek. As this name is a nomen nudum after Buffington (2008), we described it as a new species. In ANIC, there is another large card that has six specimens of Thrasorus rieki, sp. n., mixed with Chalcidoidea specimens.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/83074C36E43B5BE0A882948354FA6916	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Paretas-Martinez, J.;Restrepo-Ortiz, C.;Buffington, M.;Pujade-Villar, J.	Paretas-Martinez, J., Restrepo-Ortiz, C., Buffington, M., Pujade-Villar, J. (2011): Systematics of Australian Thrasorinae (Hymenoptera, Cynipoidea, Figitidae) with descriptions of Mikeiinae, new subfamily, two new genera, and three new species. ZooKeys 108: 21-48, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.108.829, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.108.829
