identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
EE15879A185DFFACFF7EE227FA01FCEF.text	EE15879A185DFFACFF7EE227FA01FCEF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campyloneurus Szepligeti	<div><p>Key to genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti, Cyanopterus Haliday, Craspedolcus Enderlein, Iphiaulax Foerster and Maculibracon Li, van Achterberg &amp; Chen</p><p>Noted to the listed genera have been confused frequently because of similarities in body size and colour, colour pattern of wing membrane and shape of 1-SR+M vein of fore wing.</p><p>1. Propodeum more or less tuberculate medio-posteriorly; median carina of first tergite high and medial area steep anteriorly in lateral view; vein 1r-m of hind wing long, as long as or longer than vein SC+R1; vein cu-a of fore wing distinctly postfurcal and inclivous; upper valve of ovipositor with nodus, lower valve with small teeth; face granulate and shiny........................................................................... Maculibracon Li, van Achterberg &amp; Chen, 2017</p><p>- Propodeum flattened medio-posteriorly; median carina of first tergite absent or low in lateral view; vein 1r-m of hind wing short, usually shorter than vein SC+R1; vein cu-a of fore wing subinterstitial or shortly postfurcal and perpendicular; ovipositor and face variable...................................................................................... 2</p><p>2. Ovipositor usually robust, its upper valve often strongly enlarged and without nodus and at least twice wider than lower valve in lateral view, lower valve without teeth and narrow, if ovipositor exceptionally slender or lower valve with very minute teeth then second metasomal tergite without medio-basal area or medio-longitudinal carina and scapus robust................................................................................................ Iphiaulax Foerster, 1863</p><p>- Ovipositor slender, its lower valve smooth or with distinct to minute teeth and its upper valve medium-sized and/or with small nodus, upper valve often not or weakly enlarged, if rarely obviously enlarged then second metasomal tergite with medio-basal area or complete medio-longitudinal carina; scapus variable, slender to robust..................................... 3</p><p>3. Ovipositor aberrant, its upper valve smooth and without nodus, lower valve usually without teeth and narrow, rarely lower valve with very minute teeth; scapus concave apico-laterally and more or less protruding ventrally; fifth tergite not protruding apico-laterally......................................................... Campyloneurus Szépligeti, 1900 (part)</p><p>- Ovipositor normal, its lower valve with distinct to minute teeth and its upper valve medium-sized and/or with small nodus; scapus usually concave apico-laterally and weakly to strongly protruding ventrally; corners of fifth tergite may be protruding apico-laterally........................................................................................ 4</p><p>4. First metasomal tergite without distinct median carina; clypeus without dorsal carina.......... Cyanopterus Haliday, 1835</p><p>- First tergite with median carina posteriorly; clypeus with weak dorsal carina...................................... 5</p><p>5. Vein 3-SR of fore wing 2.5–3.0 × vein 2-SR; first tergite with long and distinct median carina; fore wing slender (0.4–0.7 × its length surpassing metasoma); hind wing with 3–5 subbasal bristles; scapus elongate; face largely smooth; third tergite with distinct antero-lateral grooves....................................................................................................................................................... Craspedolcus Enderlein, 1920</p><p>- Vein 3-SR of fore wing often 1.5–2.6 × vein 2-SR; first tergite with short to medium-sized (and usually weak) median carina; fore wing robust (about 0.5 × its length surpassing metasoma); hind wing with 1–2 subbasal bristles; scapus often less slender; face often rugose or punctate; antero-lateral grooves of third tergite variable, weak to distinct.............................................................................................. Campyloneurus Szépligeti, 1900 (part)</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A185DFFACFF7EE227FA01FCEF	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A185AFFADFF7EE7FFFBD0FF6A.text	EE15879A185AFFADFF7EE7FFFBD0FF6A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campyloneurus Szepligeti 1900	<div><p>Genus Campyloneurus Szépligeti, 1900</p><p>Figs 1–28, 47</p><p>Campyloneurus Szépligeti, 1900: 50; Fahringer, 1928: 582 (as subgenus of Iphiaulax Foerster); Quicke, 1987: 105. Type species: Campyloneurus bicolor Szépligeti, 1900 .</p><p>Diolcia Enderlein, 1920: 112 . Type species: Diolcia bicarinatus Enderlein, 1920 . Synonymized by Quicke &amp; van Achterberg, 1990: 251.</p><p>Monolcia Enderlein, 1920: 113 . Type species: Monolcia tricarinatus Enderlein, 1920 . Synonymized by Quicke &amp; van Achterberg, 1990: 251.</p><p>Diagnosis. Body small or medium-sized; terminal flagellomere pointed, sometimes acute apically, in lateral view apex of scapus without double margin at inner side, concave apico-laterally and more or less protruding ventrally; eye glabrous, not or weakly emarginated; face often rugose, at least with sculpture or punctures laterally; clypeus moderately wide and usually with dorsal carina; malar suture moderately developed, but sometimes weak; labiomaxillary complex normal, not elongate; frons with distinct median groove; notauli usually only impressed anteriorly, sometimes developed on disc; propodeum often smooth, sometimes with short carina posteriorly; angle between veins 1-SR and C+SC+R of fore wing more than 55°; vein 1-SR+M of fore wing often strongly bent after arising from 1-M, rarely more or less straight; fore wing vein r shorter than vein 2-SR; fore wing vein 3-SR 1.5–2.6 × longer than vein 2-SR; fore wing vein r-m straight or rather weakly curved; fore wing vein cu-a interstitial or finely postfurcal; hind wing vein 1r-m shorter than vein SC+R1; hind wing often with setae around vein cu-a; claws simple; legs more or less with densely setae; first–fifth metasomal tergites often sculptured, sixth and seventh tergites with striae or punctures, or sometimes largely smooth; first metasomal tergite with convex median area, medio-longitudinal carina present or absent; medio-basal area of second tergite present, usually small; second suture deep and crenulate; third metasomal tergite often with antero-lateral areas; ovipositor normal, subapically upper valve with nodus, and its lower valve with teeth ventrally, or sometimes smooth, upper valve without nodus and its lower valve without teeth.</p><p>Biology. Largely unknown; in this paper we report Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) larvae as host.</p><p>Distribution. Afrotropical; Australasian; Oriental; South Palaearctic. The distribution of Chinese species, see Fig. 47.</p><p>Notes. Campyloneurus differs mainly from Iphiaulax by the distinct medio-basal area of second metasomal tergite (medio-basal area of second metasomal tergite absent in Iphiaulax), the relatively slender scapus (scapus often short/robust in Iphiaulax), and slender ovipositor (upper valve usually not enlarged or weakly enlarged; upper valve often enlarged, exceptionally slender in Iphiaulax) and the often distinctly bent vein 1-SR+M of the fore wing (but sometimes straight or nearly so; usually straight or weakly curved in Iphiaulax).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A185AFFADFF7EE7FFFBD0FF6A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A185BFFAEFF7EE57AFA01FD65.text	EE15879A185BFFAEFF7EE57AFA01FD65.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campyloneurus Szepligeti	<div><p>Key to Chinese species of the genus Campyloneurus Szépligeti</p><p>1. Ovipositor aberrant, its upper valve smooth and without nodus, and medium-sized to more or less enlarged, lower valve often without teeth and narrow (Figs 8m, 12l, 24l, 26m), rarely lower valve with very minute teeth (Fig. 22l)................. 2</p><p>- Ovipositor normal, its upper valve medium-sized and with distinct to small nodus and its lower valve with distinct to minute teeth (Figs 2l, 4l, 10l, 16l, 18l, 20l)....................................................................... 7</p><p>2. Body largely yellow including metasoma (Figs 11, 27); pterostigma largely yellow except for black apically (Figs 12a, 28a), and wing membrane at least basally yellow and with black spots (Figs 12a, 12b, 28a, 28b)........................... 3</p><p>- Body colour mainly black, at least metasoma largely black (Figs 7, 21, 23, 25); pterostigma blackish brown or brown (Figs 8a, 22a, 24a, 26a), and wing membrane largely smoky grey or nearly hyaline (Figs 8a, 8b, 22a, 22b, 24a, 24b, 26a, 26b)...... 4</p><p>3. Frons yellow and without black spot surrounding stemmaticum (Fig. 28h); vein 1-SR+M of fore wing bent basally (Fig. 28a); flagellomeres of antenna blackish brown, scapus and pedicel with a black brown stripe on outer side, respectively (Figs 27, 28k); ovipositor sheath 0.3–0.4 × as long as fore wing (Fig. 27)................................................................................................................................. C. tergipunctatus sp. nov.</p><p>- Frons medially up to area surrounding stemmaticum black (Fig. 12h); vein 1-SR+M of fore wing more or less straight (Fig. 12a); antenna entirely blackish brown (Figs 11, 12k); ovipositor sheath 0.8 × as long as fore wing (Fig. 11)............................................................................................. C. micromacularis sp. nov.</p><p>4. Head black, with some milk white spots at eye orbits dorsally, face laterally, and near malar suture (Figs 26g, 26h); metasomal tergites mainly black, but first metasomal tergite (expect median elevated area), second metasomal tergite laterally, anterolateral area of third metasomal tergite yellowish white (Fig. 26e); face crenulate near clypeus and near eye orbits, sculptured medially, and with dense punctures (Fig. 26g)............................................... C. stigmosus sp. nov.</p><p>- Head black or reddish yellow, without milk white spots (Figs 8g, 8h, 22g, 22h, 24g, 24h); metasomal tergites uniformly black or blackish brown, without yellowish white spots (Figs 8e, 22e, 24e); face without crenulae near clypeus, at most with fine crenulae laterally near eye orbits (Figs 8g, 22g, 24g), medially sculptured or smooth................................ 5</p><p>5. Face smooth (Fig. 8e) and moderately setose medially; first metasomal tergite slender, approx. 1.8 × as long as its apical width (Fig. 8j); head red (Fig. 8h)........................................................... C. longitergum sp. nov.</p><p>- Face coarsely rugose (Figs 22g, 24g) and densely setose medially; first tergite relatively robust, 1.2–1.3 × as long as its apical width (Figs 22j, 24j); head black (Figs 22h, 24h)............................................................ 6</p><p>6. Mesosoma reddish yellow (Fig. 22c); second submarginal cell of fore wing moderately short, vein SR1 1.4 × as long as vein 3-SR, and vein 3-SR approx. 2.5 × as long as vein r-m (Fig. 22a); fore wing membrane without brown spot near base of pterostigma (Fig. 22a); fore wing vein cu-a weakly postfurcal (Fig. 22a)........................... C. robusticella sp. nov.</p><p>- Mesosoma black (Fig. 24c); second submarginal cell of fore wing moderately elongate, vein SR1 1.2 × as long as vein 3-SR, and vein 3-SR approx. 3.4 × as long as vein r-m (Fig. 24a); fore wing with brown spot near base of pterostigma (Fig. 24a); fore wing vein cu-a interstitial (Fig. 24a).................................................... C. rugifacialis sp. nov.</p><p>7. Ovipositor sheath 0.2 × as long as fore wing (Figs 1, 15); third–seventh metasomal tergites largely smooth, only sparsely and finely punctate (Figs 2e, 16e)............................................................................ 8</p><p>- Ovipositor sheath 0.4–0.8 × as long as fore wing (Figs 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 19); sculpture of third–seventh tergites varies from largely smooth to coarsely sculptured........................................................................... 9</p><p>8. Metasomal tergites entirely blackish brown (Fig. 16e); antennal scapus relatively robust, 1.3 × as long as its maximum width (Fig. 16k); mesopleuron, metonotum and metopleuron blackish brown (Figs 16c, 16d); transverse subposterior groove of fifth metasomal tergite with complete (Fig. 16e)................................................. C. pachypus sp. nov.</p><p>- Metasomal tergites with yellowish pattern, third–fifth metasomal tergites with yellow spots, and sixth–seventh metasomal tergites yellowish white (Fig. 2e); antennal scapus slender, 2.3 × as long as its maximum width (Fig. 2j); mesopleuron, metonotum and metopleuron reddish yellow (Figs 2c, 2d); transverse subposterior groove of fifth tergite absent medially (Fig. 2e)................................................................................... C. brachyurus sp. nov.</p><p>9. Fore wing membrane with black or brown spots (Figs 4a, 6a, 10a); first–fifth metasomal tergites densely striate (Figs 4e, 6e, 10e)............................................................................................... 10</p><p>- Fore wing membrane uniformly yellow or brown, and without dark spots (Figs 14a, 18a, 20a); sculpture of first–seventh tergites varies from largely smooth (Fig. 20e) to coarsely sculptured (Figs 14e, 18e)............................... 12</p><p>10. Basal half of fore wing membrane blackish gray and its apical half milky white (Figs 6a, 6b); third–fifth metasomal tergites without transverse subposterior groove (Fig. 6e)........................................... C. lasiofacialis sp. nov.</p><p>- Wing membrane pale yellow, subhyaline (Figs 10a, 10b) or yellow except for dark spots (Figs 4a, 4b); third–fifth tergites with transverse subposterior groove (Figs 4e, 10e).............................................................. 11</p><p>11. Wing membrane light yellow and subhyaline (Figs 10a, 10b), fore wing with one brown spot at vein 1-SR (Fig. 10a); lateral lobes and medio-anterior part of median lobe of mesoscutum with black spot (Fig. 10d); pterostigma yellow (Fig. 10a); metasomal tergites largely black, posterior margin of sixth and seventh metasomal tergites yellow (Fig. 10e); lateral grooves of first metasomal tergite strongly crenulate (Fig. 10e).......................................... C. longitudinalis sp. nov.</p><p>- Basal half of wing membrane yellow and apical half blackish brown (Figs 4a, 4b), stigmal spot of fore wing and apical half of pterostigma black (Fig. 4a); basal half of pterostigma yellow, area below it and spot near vein 2-SR+M subhyaline (Fig. 4a); mesoscutum yellow, and without spots (Fig. 4d); metasomal tergites yellow (Fig. 4e); lateral grooves of first tergite only anteriorly weakly crenulate (Fig. 4j)..................................................... C. kirbyi (Cameron, 1905)</p><p>12. Body uniformly black; notauli developed posteriorly; fifth metasomal tergite smooth....... C. gibbiventris Enderlein, 1920</p><p>- Body yellowish pattern (Figs 13, 17, 19), at least mesoscutum reddish yellow; notauli often posteriorly shallow or largely absent (Figs 14d, 18d, 20d); fifth tergite either smooth, punctate or striate......................................... 13</p><p>13. Third–fifth metasomal tergites largely smooth (Fig. 20e) or with coarse punctures, but without longitudinal striae (Fig. 18e); second tergite with glabrous sublateral triangular areas (Figs 18e, 20e).......................................... 14</p><p>- At least third and fourth metasomal tergites with longitudinal striae (Fig. 14e); second tergite with or without sublateral triangular areas.......................................................................................... 15</p><p>14. Metasomal tergites with yellowish white spots (Fig. 20e); vein 2-SC+R of hind wing relatively long, 0.8 × as long as vein 1r-m (Fig. 20b); hypoclypeal depression moderately wide, 1.6 × as wide as malar space (Fig. 20g); frons with blackish brown spot (Fig. 20h); posterior margin of second metasomal tergite smooth (Fig. 20e).................... C. quadraticeps sp. nov.</p><p>- Metasomal tergites uniformly blackish brown (Fig. 18e); vein 2-SC+R of hind wing short, 0.4 × as long as vein 1r-m (Fig. 18b); hypoclypeal depression 1.2 × as wide as malar space (Fig. 18g); frons without dark spot (Fig. 18h); second metasomal tergite densely sculptured including posterior margin, except medio-basal and sub-lateral triangular areas smooth (Fig. 18e)........................................................................................ C. promiscuus sp. nov.</p><p>15. Fifth metasomal tergites largely smooth, but with punctures laterally; head reddish yellow; mesoscutum largely reddish yellow, middle lobe with black spots.................................................. C. cingulicauda Enderlein, 1920</p><p>- Fifth metasomal tergites with longitudinal striate (Fig. 14e); head black (Figs 14g, 14h); mesoscutum reddish yellow, and without black spots (Fig. 14d)............................................................. C. nigriventris sp. nov.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A185BFFAEFF7EE57AFA01FD65	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A1858FFAFFF7EE770FF46F862.text	EE15879A1858FFAFFF7EE770FF46F862.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campyloneurus brachyurus Li & Achterberg & Chen 2020	<div><p>Campyloneurus brachyurus sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 1–2</p><p>Type material. Holotype. CHINA • ♀; Hunan Province, Xinning; 5.Jul.1980; X.W. Tong leg.; host: larva of Callidium vilosulum Fairmaire, 1899; ZJUH 846548.</p><p>Diagnosis. This new species is very similar to C. promiscuus sp. nov., but can be separated from the latter by the following characters: metasomal tergites with yellowish pattern, third–fifth metasomal tergites with yellow spots, and sixth and seventh tergites yellowish white (uniformly blackish brown in C. promiscuus); fifth metasomal tergite with transverse subposterior groove weak and incomplete, absent medially (complete and crenulate); ovipositor sheath shorter, 0.2 × as long as fore wing (0.6 × as long as fore wing); third–fifth metasomal tergites largely smooth, only sparsely and finely punctate (coarsely punctate); temples relatively short, in dorsal view length of eye 1.6 × temple and temples linearly narrowed behind eyes (temples relatively long, in dorsal view length of eye 1.3 × temple, temples subparallel-sided behind eyes).</p><p>Description. Holotype, ♀, length of body 6.3 mm, of fore wing 6.1 mm, of ovipositor sheath 1.0 mm.</p><p>Head. Antenna with 54 antennomeres; apical flagellomere acute, 2.2 × longer than its maximum width (Fig. 2k); first flagellomere 1.5 × longer than wide, 1.2 and 1.4 × longer than second and third, respectively, the latter being 1.1 × longer than wide; malar suture with dense setae and some weak punctures; clypeus height: inter-tentorial distance: tentorio-ocular distance = 4: 11: 8; clypeus densely short setose; eye weakly emarginated (Fig. 2g); face 0.8 × longer than its width, largely smooth, except for some weak punctures, with short setae and (Fig. 2g); eye height: shortest distance between eyes: head width = 12: 11: 23; frons smooth, concave behind antennal sockets, with a strong median groove (Fig. 2i); vertex smooth, with sparse short setae; shortest distance between posterior ocelli: narrower diameter of elliptical posterior ocellus: shortest distance between posterior ocellus and eye = 4: 3: 9; in dorsal view length of eye 1.6 × temple; temples linearly narrowed behind eyes (Fig. 2h).</p><p>Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 1.7 × its height (Fig. 2c); notauli only impressed anteriorly (Fig. 2d); mesoscutum mostly smooth and sparsely setose (Fig. 2d); scutellar sulcus deep, moderately wide, with crenulae (Fig. 2d); scutellum smooth, with some setae; metanotum strongly convex medially, and short median carina somewhat protruding (Fig. 2d); propodeum largely smooth, without medio-longitudinal carina or groove, but with a few short carinae posteriorly, and sparsely setose medially, with dense long setae laterally (Fig. 2d).</p><p>Wings. Fore wing (Fig. 2a): SR1: 3-SR: r = 33: 20: 8; 1-SR+M strongly curved after arising from 1-M; 2-SR: 3-SR: r-m = 11: 20: 10; angle between 1-SR and C+SC+R about 80°; r-m rather weakly curved; cu-a interstitial. Hind wing (Fig. 2b): SC+R1: 2-SC+R: 1r-m = 15: 3: 8.</p><p>Legs. Length of fore femur: tibia: tarsus = 21: 25: 39; length of hind femur: tibia: basitarsus = 31: 43: 16; length of femur, tibia and basitarsus of hind leg 4.3, 8.1 and 5.0 × their maximum width, respectively; hind tibial spurs 0.2 and 0.3 × as long as hind basitarsus.</p><p>Metasoma. Length of first tergite 1.1 × its apical width, smooth medio-basally, median area convex, reticulate, but smooth medio-posteriorly (Fig. 2e); first tergite with a rather short medio-longitudinal carina posteriorly, and with developed lateral carinae, lateral grooves crenulate (Fig. 2e); apical width of second tergite 2.4 × its median length, triangular medio-basal area of second tergite smooth, attached to medio-longitudinal carina, absent near posterior margin of second tergite; antero-lateral areas of second tergite smooth, oblique anterior grooves deep and crenulate; second tergite coarsely sculptured, except for medio-basal, antero-lateral areas and medio-posteriorly (Fig. 2e); second suture deep, crenulate, straight medially (Fig. 2e); third–fifth tergites with antero-lateral areas, and with transverse subposterior grooves, but not impressed medially (Fig. 2e); third–seventh tergites largely smooth, except some weak punctures (Fig. 2e); ovipositor sheath 0.2 × as long as fore wing.</p><p>Colour. Head and mesosoma largely yellow (Fig. 1); flagellomeres of antenna, eyes and mandible apically blackish brown; fore and middle legs yellow (except for yellowish brown claws), hind leg yellowish brown (second segment of trochanter somewhat paler; Fig. 2f); metasoma largely yellowish brown (Fig. 2e); third–fifth metasomal tergites medially and fourth–fifth tergites laterally yellow, sixth and seventh tergites whitish yellow (Fig. 2e); ovipositor sheath black; wing membrane infuscate, pterostigma and veins dark yellow or yellowish brown (Figs 2a, 2b).</p><p>Biology. The holotype has been reared from a larva of Callidium vilosulum Fairmaire, 1899 ( Coleoptera: Cerambycidae).</p><p>Distribution. China (Hunan).</p><p>Etymology. Named after the short ovipositor sheath: “brachys” is Greek for “short” and “oura” is Greek for “tail”.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A1858FFAFFF7EE770FF46F862	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A1857FFA1FF7EE4CAFE07FE55.text	EE15879A1857FFA1FF7EE4CAFE07FE55.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campyloneurus cingulicauda Enderlein 1920	<div><p>Campyloneurus cingulicauda Enderlein, 1920</p><p>Campyloneurus cingulicauda Enderlein 1920: 105; Watanabe, 1934: 182, 1937: 20; Shenefelt, 1978: 1658; Chou, 1981: 73; Quicke &amp; van Achterberg, 1990: 252; Kittel &amp; Maeto, 2015: 203.</p><p>Biology. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Taiwan), Japan.</p><p>Note. The type series was collected from “Taihorin” (Taiwan) by H. Sauter. Enderlein (1920) listed only Taiwan as Watanabe (1934, 1937) and Chou (1981) till Kittel &amp; Maeto (2015) reported it from Japan. No specimens were available for our study.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A1857FFA1FF7EE4CAFE07FE55	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A1857FFA1FF7EE661FE9BFCF2.text	EE15879A1857FFA1FF7EE661FE9BFCF2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campyloneurus gibbiventris Enderlein 1920	<div><p>Campyloneurus gibbiventris Enderlein, 1920</p><p>Campyloneurus gibbiventris Enderlein, 1920: 104; Shenefelt, 1978: 1659; You, Quicke &amp; Zhou, 1994: 121.</p><p>Biology. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Guangxi); India.</p><p>Note. You et al. (1994) reported the species from Guangxi (SW. China), but no specimens were available for our study.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A1857FFA1FF7EE661FE9BFCF2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A1857FFA3FF7EE7C2FF6DFD7A.text	EE15879A1857FFA3FF7EE7C2FF6DFD7A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campyloneurus kirbyi (Cameron 1905)	<div><p>Campyloneurus kirbyi (Cameron, 1905)</p><p>Figs 3–4</p><p>Iphiaulax kirbyi Cameron, 1905: 85; Ramakrishna Ayyar, 1924: 353.</p><p>Campyloneurus kirbyi (Cameron): Baltazar, 1972: 261; Shenefelt, 1978: 1660.</p><p>Material. CHINA— Yunnan Province • 1♀; Xishuangbanna, Gannanba; 540m; 22 Mar.1957; F.J. Pu leg.; IZCAS IOZ (E) 1964547 • 1♀; ibid.; but 17 Apr. 1957; F.J. Pu leg.; IZCAS IOZ (E) 1964539 • 1♀; ibid.; but Xiaomengyang; 850m; 11 Oct. 1957; L.C. Zang leg.; IZCAS IOZ (E) 1964573• 1♀; Jingdong; 1200m; 6 Mar. 1957; Bangfeiluofu leg.; IZCAS IOZ (E) 1964543.</p><p>Biology. Unkown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Yunnan); Sri Lanka.</p><p>Note. This species is new to China. Baltazar (1972) designated the lectotype of Iphiaulax kirbyi Cameron and transferred it to the genus Campyloneurus . The species was never re-described, but the original description states well the distinct colour pattern of the fore wing (pterostigma partly blackish and yellow, with variable blackish area in first submarginal cell, membrane yellowish but darkened apically), the distinct sculpture of face (irregularly rugose) and the smooth triangular medio-basal area of the second tergite. Since the original description lists several important characters and fits well with the Chinese specimens from Yunnan, we refer the Chinese specimens to this species.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A1857FFA3FF7EE7C2FF6DFD7A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A1855FFA5FF7EE74AFA12FA23.text	EE15879A1855FFA5FF7EE74AFA12FA23.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campyloneurus lasiofacialis Li & Achterberg & Chen 2020	<div><p>Campyloneurus lasiofacialis sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 5–6</p><p>Type material. Holotype. CHINA • ♀; Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna, Meng’a; 1050–1080m; 8 Aug. 1958; F.J. Pu leg.; IZCAS IOZ (E)1964565 . Paratypes. CHINA • 1♀; ibid.; but from Xiaomengyang; 850m; 12 Sep. 1957; S.Y. Wang leg.; IZCAS IOZ (E) 1964569 • 1♀; ibid.; but from Mengla; 620–650m; 13 Jul. 1959, F.J. Pu leg.; IZCAS IOZ (E) 1964619.</p><p>Diagnosis. This new species is very similar to C. brunneomaculatus (Cameron, 1903), but can be separated from the latter by the following characters: ovipositor sheath relatively long, 0.4–0.6 × as long as body (0.2 × as long as body in C. brunneomaculatus); second metasomal tergite with medio-basal triangular area coarsely sculptured (smooth); head uniformly black (head brown and vertex largely black); second–fourth metasomal tergites with similar distinct longitudinal striae (third and fourth metasomal tergites with relatively weak sculpture compare to second metasomal tergite); antennal flagellomeres black (light brown).</p><p>Description. Holotype, ♀, length of body 8.0 mm, of fore wing 7.2 mm, of ovipositor sheath 3.1 mm.</p><p>Head. Antenna with 50 antennomeres; apical flagellomere acute and protruding apically, 2.1 × longer than its maximum width (Fig. 6l); first flagellomere 1.7 × longer than its maximum width, 1.2 and 1.3 × longer than second and third flagellomeres, respectively, the latter being 1.2 × longer wide; malar suture moderately developed, sculptured (Fig. 6i); clypeus height: inter-tentorial distance: tentorio-ocular distance = 4: 9: 5; clypeus densely long setose; eye not emarginated (Fig. 6g); face 0.9 × longer than wide, densely long setose, and coarsely sculptured (Fig. 6g); eye height: shortest distance between eyes: head width = 19: 17: 38; frons smooth except for some weak punctures, concave behind antennal sockets, with a strong median groove (Fig. 6h); vertex smooth, with sparse short setae; shortest distance between posterior ocelli: narrower diameter of elliptical posterior ocellus: shortest distance between posterior ocellus and eye = 3: 4: 9; in dorsal view length of eye 1.8 × temple; temples linearly narrowed behind eyes (Fig. 6h).</p><p>Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 1.7 × its height (Fig. 6c); notauli only impressed anteriorly (Fig. 6d); mesoscutum with a few punctures (Fig. 6d); scutellar sulcus deep and wide, with crenulae (Fig. 6d); scutellum densely punctate and short setose; metanotum strongly convex medially; propodeum sparsely punctate, with a short mediolongitudinal carina posteriorly, sparsely setose medially, and densely long setose laterally (Fig. 6d).</p><p>Wings. Fore wing (Fig. 6a): SR1: 3-SR: r = 25: 20: 3; 1-SR+M rather weakly curved after arising from 1-M; 2-SR: 3-SR: r-m = 9: 26: 9; angle between 1-SR and C+SC+R about 80°; r-m rather weakly curved; cu-a interstitial. Hind wing (Fig. 6b): SC+R1: 2-SC+R: 1r-m = 19: 5: 10.</p><p>Legs. Length of fore femur: tibia: tarsus = 21: 24: 27; length of hind femur: tibia: basitarsus = 30: 46: 16; length of femur, tibia and basitarsus of hind leg 2.7, 6.1 and 4.0 × their maximum width, respectively; hind tibial spurs 0.4 and 0.6 × as long as hind basitarsus.</p><p>Metasoma. Metasomal tergites strongly sculptured (Fig. 6e); first tergite as long as its apical width, median area convex and with a medio-longitudinal carina (Fig. 6j); first tergite with developed lateral carinae, lateral grooves crenulate (Fig. 6j); apical width of second tergite 2.3 × its median length, triangular medio-basal area of second tergite rugose, without medio-longitudinal carina; antero-lateral areas of second tergite absent, anterior grooves deep and crenulate (Fig. 6e); second suture wide and deep, crenulate, distinctly curved medially (Fig. 6e); third–fifth tergites with weakly antero-lateral areas, and transverse subposterior groove absent (Fig. 6e); ovipositor sheath 0.6 × as long as fore wing.</p><p>Colour. Black (Fig. 5); basal half of wing membrane blackish grey and apical half whitish; apical quarter of pterostigma yellow and remainder black; veins blackish brown or yellow (Figs 6a, 6b).</p><p>Variation. Length of body 8.3–9.0 mm, of fore wing 8.2–8.3 mm (♀), and of ovipositor sheath 5.0– 5.2 mm; antenna of ♀ with 52–56 antennomeres; length of mesosoma 1.5–1.6 × its height; propodeum sometimes blackish brown.</p><p>Biology. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Yunnan).</p><p>Etymology. Named after its densely setose face: “lasios” (Greek for “hairy”) and “facies” is Latin for “face”.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A1855FFA5FF7EE74AFA12FA23	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A1853FFB8FF7EE1B3FD9CFBAE.text	EE15879A1853FFB8FF7EE1B3FD9CFBAE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campyloneurus longitergum Li & Achterberg & Chen 2020	<div><p>Campyloneurus longitergum sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 7–8</p><p>Type material. Holotype. CHINA • ♀; Yunnan Province, Shancha river; 12 Apr. 1981; J.H. He leg.; ZJUH 811708.</p><p>Diagnosis. This new species is very similar to C. cingulicauda Enderlein, 1920, but can be separated from the latter by the following characters: fifth metasomal tergite coarsely sculptured (fifth metasomal tergite largely smooth in C. cingulicauda); sixth and seventh metasomal tergites entirely black (whitish yellow posteriorly); propodeum black (reddish brown); ovipositor sheath 0.4 × as long as fore wing (0.6 ×).</p><p>Description. Holotype, ♀, length of body 7.1 mm, of fore wing 7.2 mm, of ovipositor sheath 2.6 mm.</p><p>Head. Antenna with 54 antennomeres; apical flagellomere acute, with short spine, 2.3 × longer than its maximum width (Fig. 8l); first flagellomere 1.4 × longer than its maximum width, 1.1 and 1.2 × longer than second and third flagellomeres, respectively, the latter 1.2 × longer than wide; malar suture weakly sculptured and short setose (Fig. 8i); clypeus height: inter-tentorial distance: tentorio-ocular distance = 4: 14: 7; clypeus sparsely short setose; eye hardly emarginated (Fig. 8g); width of hypoclypeal depression 1.2 × its height; face as long as wide, with some transverse carinae and long setae laterally, smooth medially (Fig. 8g); eye height: shortest distance between eyes: head width = 25: 20: 48; frons smooth, weakly concave behind antennal sockets, with a strong median groove (Fig. 8h); vertex largely glabrous except for some sparse short setae; minimum distance between posterior ocelli: minimum diameter of elliptical posterior ocellus: minimum distance between posterior ocellus and eye = 4: 3: 10; in dorsal view length of eye twice temple; temples strongly narrowed behind eyes (Fig. 8h).</p><p>Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 1.8 × its height (Fig. 8c); notauli only impressed anteriorly (Fig. 8d); mesoscutum largely glabrous, but with long setae along notauli (Fig. 8d); scutellar sulcus deep and crenulate (Fig. 8d); scutellum with dense short setae posteriorly; metanotum strongly convex medially (Fig. 8d); propodeum smooth, without medio-longitudinal carina or groove, sparsely setose medially, and densely long setose laterally (Fig. 8d).</p><p>Wings. Fore wing (Fig. 8a): pterostigma 3.8 × longer than wide; SR1: 3-SR: r = 30: 25: 6; 1-SR+M strongly bent subbasally; 2-SR: 3-SR: r-m = 9: 25: 9; angle between 1-SR and C+SC+R about 75°; cu-a interstitial, vertical. Hind wing (Fig. 8b): SC+R1: 2-SC+R: 1r-m = 22: 8: 19.</p><p>Legs. Length of fore femur: tibia: tarsus = 23: 26: 36; length of hind femur: tibia: basitarsus = 32: 47: 17; length of femur, tibia and basitarsus of hind leg 4.0, 9.4 and 5.7 × their maximum width, respectively; hind tibial spurs 0.4 and 0.5 × as long as hind basitarsus.</p><p>Metasoma. Length of first metasomal tergite 1.7 × its apical width, median area convex and coarsely sculptured, medio-longitudinal carina absent, lateral grooves with some sparse crenulae anteriorly (Fig. 8j); second tergite largely densely sculptured, triangular medio-basal area of second tergite smooth, attached with medio-longitudinal carina apically, latter not reaching posterior margin of second tergite (Fig. 8e); apical width of second tergite 1.1 × its median length, antero-lateral areas of second tergite rather small and smooth, anterior grooves wide and crenulate (Fig. 8e); second suture wide and deep, crenulate, straight medially (Fig. 8e); apical width of third tergite 3.9 × its median length; third tergite with antero-lateral areas, subposterior groove short and present only laterally (Fig. 8e); third–sixth tergites coarsely sculptured; third–fifth tergites with antero-lateral areas (but of fifth tergite weak); fourth–sixth tergites with subposterior groove (but of fourth tergite absent medially) (Fig. 8e); seventh tergite largely smooth; fourth–seventh tergites densely setose posteriorly; ovipositor sheath 0.4 × as long as fore wing.</p><p>Colour. Head and mesosoma largely reddish yellow (Fig. 7); antenna, eyes, mandible apically, tegula, metanotum medially and propodeum black (Figs 8d, 8g); metapleuron ventrally (Fig. 8c), middle lobe and lateral lobes of mesoscutum with a black spot (Fig. 8d); legs black, fore femur and tibia, middle tibia apically yellowish or infuscate (Fig. 8f); metasoma and ovipositor sheath black (Figs 7, 8e); wing membrane greyish brown, fore wing with small dark brown stigmal spot up to vein 1-SR+M subbasally; pterostigma and veins blackish brown (Figs 8a, 8b).</p><p>Biology. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Yunnan).</p><p>Etymology. Named after the relatively slender first metasomal tergite: “longus” and “tergum” is Latin for “long” and “back”, respectively.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A1853FFB8FF7EE1B3FD9CFBAE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A184EFFBAFF7EE03FFF60FA5A.text	EE15879A184EFFBAFF7EE03FFF60FA5A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campyloneurus longitudinalis Li & Achterberg & Chen 2020	<div><p>Campyloneurus longitudinalis sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 9–10</p><p>Type material. Holotype. CHINA • ♀; Yunnan Province, Ruili; 6 May 1981; J.H. He leg.; ZJUH 813011.</p><p>Diagnosis. This new species is very similar to C. latesuturalis Turner, 1919, but can be separated from the latter by the following characters: notauli often impressed anteriorly and reduced posteriorly (notauli nearly reaching posterior margin of mesoscutum in C. latesuturalis); fourth and fifth metasomal tergites longitudinally striate (coarsely punctate); mesoscutum yellow, but lateral lobes and medio-anterior part of median lobe with a black spot (reddish brown and without black spots); pterostigma and most veins yellow (black); ovipositor sheath shorter, 0.5 × as long as body (longer, 0.75 × as long as body).</p><p>Description. Holotype, ♀, length of body 8.4 mm, of fore wing 8.8 mm, of ovipositor sheath 4.1 mm.</p><p>Head. Antenna with 48 antennomeres; apical flagellomere acute, 2.3 × longer than its maximum width (Fig. 10k); first flagellomere 1.7 × longer than its maximum width, 1.4 and 1.5 × longer than second and third flagellomeres, respectively, the latter 1.1 × longer than wide; malar suture moderately developed, coarsely rugose and densely short setose (Fig. 10i); clypeus height: inter-tentorial distance: tentorio-ocular distance = 4: 11: 9; clypeus long setose; eye weakly emarginated (Fig. 10g); face 0.7 × longer than wide, densely long setose, and coarsely sculptured (Fig. 10g); eye height: shortest distance between eyes: head width = 19: 17: 38; frons largely glabrous except for some sparse setae, concave behind antennal sockets, with a strong median groove (Fig. 10h); vertex largely glabrous, but with some sparse short setae; shortest distance between posterior ocelli: narrower diameter of elliptical posterior ocellus: shortest distance between posterior ocellus and eye = 10: 9: 20; in dorsal view length of eye 1.8 × temple; temples linearly narrowed behind eyes (Fig. 10h).</p><p>Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 1.6 × its height (Fig. 10c); notauli only impressed anteriorly (Fig. 10d); mesoscutum largely glabrous, except for some long setae along notauli (Fig. 10d); scutellar sulcus deep and narrow, with crenulae (Fig. 10d); scutellum densely punctate and short setose; metanotum strongly convex medially, and with a short median carina anteriorly (Fig. 10d); propodeum largely smooth, except for a few short lateral carinae posteriorly, sparsely setose medially, and densely long setose laterally (Fig. 10d).</p><p>Wings. Fore wing (Fig. 10a): SR1: 3-SR: r = 40: 32: 5; 1-SR+M strongly bent after arising from 1-M; 2-SR: 3SR: r-m = 8: 32: 9; angle between 1-SR and C+SC+R about 75°; r-m weakly curved; cu-a weakly postfurcal. Hind wing (Fig. 10b): SC+R1: 2-SC+R: 1r-m = 15: 3: 10.</p><p>Legs. Length of fore femur: tibia: tarsus = 22: 25: 37; length of hind femur: tibia: basitarsus = 27: 43: 17; length of femur, tibia and basitarsus of hind leg 3.5, 7.1 and 5.8 × their maximum width, respectively; hind tibial spurs 0.40 and 0.35 × as long as hind basitarsus.</p><p>Metasoma. Metasomal tergites largely longitudinally sculptured (Fig. 10e); length of first tergite 1.1 × its apical width, median area convex and with a short medio-longitudinal carina posteriorly (Fig. 10e); first tergite with distinct lateral carinae, lateral grooves crenulate (Fig. 10e); apical width of second tergite 1.9 × its median length, triangular medio-basal area of second tergite glabrous, attached to medio-longitudinal carina absent near posterior margin of second tergite; antero-lateral areas of second tergite absent, anterior grooves deep and crenulate (Fig. 10e); second suture wide, crenulate, straight medially (Fig. 10e); third–fifth tergites with weak antero-lateral areas, and transverse subposterior groove crenulate (Fig. 10e); sixth and seventh tergites glabrous, with some weak punctures posteriorly; ovipositor sheath 0.5 × as long as fore wing.</p><p>Colour. Largely black (Fig. 9); but head mostly yellow, antenna, eyes and apex of mandible black brown; pronotum, scutellum and metanotum yellow; lateral and middle lobes of mesoscutum with a black spot anteriorly; fore and middle claws dark brown; hind leg black brown (Fig. 10f); sixth and seventh metasomal tergites yellow posteriorly (Fig. 10e); wing membrane largely infuscate, brownish grey apically, stigmal spot dark brown, pterostigma and veins infuscate (Figs 10a, 10b).</p><p>Biology. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Yunnan).</p><p>Etymology. Named after the largely longitudinally sculptured metasomal tergites: “longitudo” is Latin for “length”.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A184EFFBAFF7EE03FFF60FA5A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A184CFFBDFF7EE26BFD20FCE2.text	EE15879A184CFFBDFF7EE26BFD20FCE2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campyloneurus micromacularis Li & Achterberg & Chen 2020	<div><p>Campyloneurus micromacularis sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 11–12</p><p>Type material. Holotype. CHINA • ♀; Yunnan Province, Jinggu; 930m; 13 Apr. 1955; Keleirangluofusiji leg.; IZCAS IOZ (E)1964535.</p><p>Diagnosis. This new species is very similar to C. kirbyi (Cameron, 1905), but can be separated from the latter by the following characters: frons medially up to area surrounding stemmaticum black (head yellow and without black spot surrounding stemmaticum in C. kirbyi); second metasomal tergite largely with longitudinal striae (coarsely reticulated sculptured); fore wing vein 1-SR+M more or less straight (curved); face coarsely punctate (irregularly rugose); hind wing vein SC+R1 1.1 × as long as vein 1r-m (longer, 1.8 ×).</p><p>Description. Holotype, ♀, length of body 12.8 mm, of fore wing 11.6 mm, of ovipositor sheath 9.5 mm.</p><p>Head. Antenna incomplete, with 82 antennomeres remaining; first flagellomere 1.1 × longer than its maximum width, 1.2 and 1.3 × longer than second and third, respectively, the latter as long as wide; malar suture developed and sparsely short setose (Fig. 12i); clypeus height: inter-tentorial distance: tentorio-ocular distance = 4: 9: 5; clypeus sparsely short setose; eye not emarginated (Fig. 12g); width of hypoclypeal depression 1.3 × its height; face 1.1 × longer than wide, coarsely punctate, with long setae laterally (Fig. 12g); eye height: shortest distance between eyes: head width = 19: 17: 34; frons smooth, weakly concave behind antennal sockets, with a strong median groove (Fig. 12h); vertex largely glabrous except for some sparse short setae; minimum distance between posterior ocelli: minimum diameter of elliptical posterior ocellus: minimum distance between posterior ocellus and eye = 1: 1: 2; in dorsal view length of eye twice temple; temples strongly narrowed behind eyes (Fig. 12h).</p><p>Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 2.1 × its height (Fig. 12c); notauli only impressed anteriorly (Fig. 12d); mesoscutum largely glabrous, but with a few long setae posteriorly and along notauli (Fig. 12d); scutellar sulcus deep and sparsely crenulate (Fig. 12d); scutellum with a few weak punctures medially; metanotum strongly convex medially, with a short carina medio-anteriorly (Fig. 12d); propodeum largely smooth except for some sparse weak punctures medially, without medio-longitudinal carina or groove, sparsely setose medially, and densely long setose laterally (Fig. 12d).</p><p>Wings. Fore wing (Fig. 12a): pterostigma 2.9 × longer than wide; SR1: 3-SR: r = 28: 21: 5; 1-SR+M more or less straight; 2-SR: 3-SR: r-m = 9: 21: 10; angle between 1-SR and C+SC+R about 80°; cu-a narrowly postfurcal, weakly oblique anteriorly. Hind wing (Fig. 12b): SC+R1: 2-SC+R: 1r-m = 17: 5: 15.</p><p>Legs. Length of fore femur: tibia: tarsus = 25: 29: 34; length of hind femur: tibia: basitarsus = 35: 61: 21; length of femur, tibia and basitarsus of hind leg 3.7, 9.4 and 5.2 × their maximum width, respectively; hind tibial spurs 0.3 and 0.5 × as long as hind basitarsus.</p><p>Metasoma. Length of first metasomal tergite 1.1 × its apical width, median area convex and with medio-longitudinal carina and medially with some longitudinal striae, lateral grooves with a few sparse crenulae anteriorly and posteriorly (Fig. 12j); second tergite largely with longitudinal striae except posteriorly, triangular medio-basal area of second tergite smooth, attached to medio-longitudinal carina apically, latter not reaching posterior margin of second tergite (Fig. 12e); apical width of second tergite 1.4 × its median length, antero-lateral areas of second tergite smooth, anterior grooves crenulate (Fig. 12e); second suture wide and deep, crenulate, nearly straight medially (Fig. 12e); third tergite largely smooth except for longitudinal striae medio-basally, with antero-lateral areas and oblique anterior grooves smooth, without subposterior groove, densely setose laterally (Fig. 12e); fourth–sixth tergites coarsely sculptured (Fig. 12e); third–fifth tergites with antero-lateral areas (but of fifth tergite weak) (Fig. 12e); fourth–seventh tergites smooth, densely setose; ovipositor sheath 0.8 × as long as fore wing.</p><p>Colour. Largely yellow (Fig. 11); antenna, eyes and mandible apically blackish brown (Fig. 12g); frons medially up to area surrounding stemmaticum black, but not reaching eyes (Fig. 12h); pronotum, metapleuron ventrally and metasomal tergites infuscate (Figs 12c, 12e); claws and hind tarsus (except for first segment basally) blackish brown (Fig. 12f); basal half of wing membrane and of pterostigma yellow and remainder dark brown, stigmal spot dark brown, below basal half of pterostigma up to second discal cell anteriorly pale, veins dark brown or yellow (Figs 12a, 12b); ovipositor sheath black (Fig. 11).</p><p>Biology. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Yunnan).</p><p>Etymology. Named after the small dorsal spot of the head, not reaching eyes or temple: “micros” is Greek “small” and for and “macula” is Latin for “spot”.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A184CFFBDFF7EE26BFD20FCE2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A184BFFB0FF7EE7F3FE1EFEA3.text	EE15879A184BFFB0FF7EE7F3FE1EFEA3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campyloneurus nigriventris Li & Achterberg & Chen 2020	<div><p>Campyloneurus nigriventris sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 13–14</p><p>Type material. Holotype. CHINA • ♀; Yunnan Province, Ruili Mengxiu; 2 to 6 May 1981; J.H. He leg.; ZJUH 813089 . Paratypes. CHINA • 1♀; Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna Yunjinghong; 650m; 5 Aug. 1959; X.Z. Zhang leg.; IZCAS IOZ (E) 1964630 • 1♀; ibid.; but from Damenglong; 650m; 8 Apr. 1958, Y. R. Zhang leg.; IZCAS IOZ (E) 1964579.</p><p>Diagnosis. This new species is very similar to C. latesuturalis Turner, 1919, but can be separated from the latter by the following characters: median length of second metasomal tergite distinctly less than its basal width (median length equal to its basal width in C. latesuturalis); scutellum black (reddish brown); fourth and fifth metasomal tergites with longitudinal striae (coarsely punctate); second metasomal tergite with medio-basal triangular area sculptured (smooth); vein 3-SR of fore wing 0.7 × as long as vein SR1 (both of approximately equal length).</p><p>Description. Holotype, ♀, length of body 9.0 mm, of fore wing 8.4 mm, of ovipositor sheath 5.3 mm.</p><p>Head. Antenna with 47 antennomeres; apical flagellomere acute and protruding apically, 2.1 × longer than its maximum width (Fig. 14l); first flagellomere 1.5 × longer than its maximum width, 1.1 and 1.2 × longer than second and third flagellomeres, respectively, latter 1.2 × longer than wide; malar suture densely short setose, and sculptured (Fig. 14i); clypeus height: inter-tentorial distance: tentorio-ocular distance = 4: 10: 7; clypeus sparsely long setose; eye weakly emarginated (Fig. 14g); face 0.9 × longer than wide, densely long setose, and coarsely sculptured (Fig. 14g); eye height: shortest distance between eyes: head width = 10: 9: 19; frons largely smooth, concave behind antennal sockets, with a strong median groove (Fig. 14h); vertex smooth, with sparse short setae; shortest distance between posterior ocelli: narrower diameter of elliptical posterior ocellus: shortest distance between posterior ocellus and eye = 4: 5: 12; in dorsal view length of eye 1.3 × temple; temples weakly narrowed behind eyes (Fig. 14h).</p><p>Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 1.6 × its height (Fig. 14c); notauli impressed only anteriorly (Fig. 14d); mesoscutum sparsely setose (Fig. 10d); scutellar sulcus deep and with crenulae (Fig. 14d); scutellum densely short setose; metanotum strongly convex medially, and with a short median carina anteriorly (Fig. 14d); propodeum largely smooth, but with a few short longitudinal carinae latero- and medio-posteriorly, sparsely setose medially, and densely long setose laterally (Fig. 14d).</p><p>Wings. Fore wing (Fig. 14a): SR1: 3-SR: r = 43: 28: 4; 1-SR+M strongly bent after arising from 1-M; 2-SR: 3SR: r-m = 12: 28: 9; angle between 1-SR and C+SC+R about 85°; r-m rather weakly curved; cu-a weakly postfurcal. Hind wing (Fig. 14b): SC+R1: 2-SC+R: 1r-m = 20: 6: 11.</p><p>Legs. Length of fore femur: tibia: tarsus = 27: 34: 39; length of hind femur: tibia: basitarsus = 41: 65: 26; length of femur, tibia and basitarsus of hind leg 5.0, 8.5 and 6.7 × their maximum width, respectively; hind tibial spurs 0.3 and 0.4 × as long as hind basitarsus.</p><p>Metasoma. Metasomal tergites largely strongly sculptured (Fig. 14e); length of first tergite 0.9 × its apical width, median area convex and with a branched medio-longitudinal carina (Fig. 14j); first tergite with developed lateral carinae, lateral grooves shallow and crenulate (Fig. 14j); apical width of second tergite twice its median length, triangular medio-basal area of second tergite weakly rugose, attached to medio-longitudinal carina absent near posterior margin of second tergite; antero-lateral areas of second tergite absent, anterior grooves deep and crenulate (Fig. 14e); second suture wide and deep, crenulate, weakly curved medially (Fig. 14e); third–fifth tergites with weak antero-lateral areas, and crenulate transverse subposterior groove (Fig. 14e); sixth and seventh tergites largely smooth; ovipositor sheath 0.6 × as long as fore wing.</p><p>Colour. Largely black (Fig. 13); propleuron and mesoscutum reddish yellow (Figs 14c, 14d); sixth and seventh metasomal tergites yellow posteriorly (Fig. 14e); wing membrane smoky grey, pterostigma and veins dark brown (Figs 14a, 14b).</p><p>Variation. Length of body 8.6–9.1 mm, of fore wing 8.2–9.1 mm (♀), and of ovipositor sheath 5.3–5.5 mm; antenna of ♀ with 52 antennomere; in dorsal view length of eye 2.0–2.1 × temple; length of mesosoma 1.5–1.6 × its height; propodeum weakly punctate or largely smooth; fore wing vein SR1 1.3–1.5 × as long as vein 3-SR;; apical width of second tergite 2.0–2.5 × its median length; ovipositor sheath 0.6–0.7 × as long as fore wing; mesopleuron somewhat reddish or black anteriorly; propodeum sometimes blackish brown; pterostigma dark brown or yellow.</p><p>Biology. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Yunnan).</p><p>Etymology. Named after the largely dark metasomal sternites: “niger” and “venter” are Latin for “black” and “belly”, respectively.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A184BFFB0FF7EE7F3FE1EFEA3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A1846FFB2FF7EE533FBE7F9B6.text	EE15879A1846FFB2FF7EE533FBE7F9B6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campyloneurus pachypus Li & Achterberg & Chen 2020	<div><p>Campyloneurus pachypus sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 15–16</p><p>Type material. Holotype. CHINA • ♀; Hubei Province, Shennongjia Songbai; 19 Jul. 1997; Y.Z. Du leg.; ZJUH 975309 . Paratype. CHINA • 1♀; Zhejiang Province, Tianmu Mt.; 20 Jul. 1987; X.X. Chen leg.; ZJUH 872042 .</p><p>Diagnosis. This new species is very similar to C. brachyurus sp. nov., but can be separated from the latter by the following characters: third–fifth metasomal tergites uniformly blackish brown (third–fifth tergites with yellowish spots in C. brachyurus); antennal scape relatively robust, 1.3 × as long as its maximum width (2.3 ×); mesopleuron, metanotum and metapleuron blackish brown (reddish yellow); transverse subposterior groove of fifth metasomal tergite complete (absent medially).</p><p>Description. Holotype, ♀, length of body 6.6 mm, of fore wing 6.2 mm, of ovipositor sheath 1.3 mm.</p><p>Head. Antenna incomplete, with 44 antennomere remaining; first flagellomere 1.3 × longer than its maximum width, 1.1 and 1.2 × longer than second and third flagellomeres, respectively, the latter 1.2 × longer than wide; malar suture sparsely short setose, and with fine punctures (Fig. 16g); clypeus height: inter-tentorial distance: tentorioocular distance = 4: 9: 5; clypeus sparsely long setose; eye weakly emarginated (Fig. 16g); face 0.7 × longer than wide, largely smooth, with some punctures and long setae (Fig. 16g); eye height: shortest distance between eyes: head width = 19: 17: 37; frons smooth, concave behind antennal sockets, with a strong median groove (Fig. 16h); vertex largely glabrous except for a few short setae; minimum distance between posterior ocelli: minimum diameter of elliptical posterior ocellus: minimum distance between posterior ocellus and eye = 1: 1: 2; in dorsal view length of eye 2.1 × temple; temples directly narrowed behind eyes (Fig. 16h).</p><p>Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 1.8 × its height (Fig. 16c); notauli impressed anteriorly only (Fig. 16d); mesoscutum largely glabrous, but with long setae along imaginary notaulic courses (Fig. 16d); scutellar sulcus deep and wide, crenulate (Fig. 16d); scutellum with dense short setae posteriorly; metanotum strongly convex medially, and with a short median carina anteriorly (Fig. 16d); propodeum largely smooth, but with a few short longitudinal carinae latero- and medio-posteriorly, sparsely setose medially, and densely long setose laterally (Fig. 16d).</p><p>Wings. Fore wing (Fig. 16a): SR1: 3-SR: r = 34: 23: 7; 1-SR+M bent after arising from 1-M; 2-SR: 3-SR: r-m = 11: 23: 9; angle between 1-SR and C+SC+R about 80°; r-m straight; cu-a interstitial. Hind wing (Fig. 16b): SC+R1: 2-SC+R: 1r-m = 18: 3: 10.</p><p>Legs. Length of fore femur: tibia: tarsus = 20: 24: 31; length of hind femur: tibia: basitarsus = 30: 40: 15; length of femur, tibia and basitarsus of hind leg 3.8, 6.9 and 5.0 × their maximum width, respectively; hind tibial spurs 0.3 and 0.4 × as long as hind basitarsus.</p><p>Metasoma. Length of first metasomal tergite 1.1 × its apical width, median area convex and coarsely sculptured, with a short medio-longitudinal carina posteriorly (Fig. 16j); first tergite with developed lateral carinae, lateral grooves strongly crenulate (Fig. 16j); second tergite largely coarsely sculptured, but smooth posteriorly (Fig. 16e); apical width of second tergite 1.9 × its median length, triangular medio-basal area of second tergite smooth, connected to some transverse carinae laterally, and attached to medio-longitudinal carina apically absent near posterior margin of second tergite; antero-lateral areas of second tergite smooth, anterior grooves wide and crenulate (Fig. 16e); second suture wide and deep, crenulate, straight medially (Fig. 16e); third–fifth tergites with antero-lateral areas, and shallow crenulate transverse subposterior groove but flat medially (complete on fifth tergite) (Fig. 16e); third–seventh tergites largely smooth except a few weak punctures; ovipositor sheath 0.2 × as long as fore wing.</p><p>Colour. Head and mesosoma largely reddish yellow (Fig. 15); antenna, eyes and apex of mandible blackish brown (Fig. 16g); mesopleuron, metapleuron, metanotum and propodeum black (Figs 16c, 16d); fore legs yellowish brown, middle and hind legs blackish brown (Fig. 16f); metasomal tergites black, but sixth and seventh tergites ivory (Figs 16e, 16j); wing membrane infuscate, pterostigma and veins yellowish brown (Figs 16a, 16b); ovipositor sheath black (Fig. 15).</p><p>Variation. Length of body of female 6.4–6.6 mm, and of ovipositor sheath 1.1–1.3 mm; antenna of one female with 53 antennomeres, its apical flagellomere acute and 2.5 × longer than wide.</p><p>Biology. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Hubei, Zhejiang).</p><p>Etymology. Named after the relatively robust scapus: “pachys” is Greek for “thick”.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A1846FFB2FF7EE533FBE7F9B6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A1844FFB5FF7EE207FEF1FE4A.text	EE15879A1844FFB5FF7EE207FEF1FE4A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campyloneurus promiscuus Li & Achterberg & Chen 2020	<div><p>Campyloneurus promiscuus sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 17–18</p><p>Type material Holotype. CHINA • ♀; Guangdong Province, Hua County; Jun. 1976; Y.Q. Liu leg.; host: Semanotus bifasciatus (Motschulsky); ZJUH 760716 . Paratypes. CHINA • 2³³; same data as holotype; ZJUH 760716 (two specimens) .</p><p>Diagnosis. This new species is very similar to C. gibbiventris Enderlein, 1920, but can be separated from the latter by the following characters: head and mesosoma mainly reddish yellow (head and mesosoma entirely black in C. gibbiventris); third and fourth metasomal tergites largely coarsely punctate (densely and weakly curved longitudinally striate); fifth tergite coarsely punctate (smooth); wing membrane yellow or subhyaline, pterostigma and veins yellowish brown (wing membrane, pterostigma and veins blackish brown).</p><p>Description. Holotype, ♀, length of body 6.3 mm, of fore wing 6.7 mm, of ovipositor sheath 3.7 mm.</p><p>Head. Antenna with 42 antennomeres; apical flagellomere acute, 1.7 × longer than its maximum width (Fig. 18k); first flagellomere 1.4 × longer than its maximum width, 1.1 and 1.2 × longer than second and third, respectively, the latter being 1.3 × longer than wide; malar suture densely short stose, and with fine sculpture (Fig. 18i); clypeus height: inter-tentorial distance: tentorio-ocular distance = 1: 3: 2; clypeus sparsely long setose; eye nearly immarginated (Fig. 18g); face 0.8 × longer than wide, densely long setose and coarsely sculptured (Fig. 18g); eye height: shortest distance between eyes: head width = 1: 1: 2; frons largely smooth, concave behind antennal sockets, with a strong median groove (Fig. 18h); vertex smooth, with sparse short setae; minimum distance between posterior ocelli: minimum diameter of elliptical posterior ocellus: minimum distance between posterior ocellus and eye = 4: 3: 6; in dorsal view length of eye 1.3 × temple; temples weakly narrowed behind eyes (Fig. 18h).</p><p>Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 1.5 × its height (Fig. 18c); notauli only impressed anteriorly (Fig. 18d); mesoscutum sparsely punctate, along notauli with long setae (Fig. 18d); scutellar sulcus deep, moderately wide, and with crenulae (Fig. 18d); scutellum sparsely punctate, with dense short setae posteriorly; metanotum strongly convex medially, and with a short median carina anteriorly (Fig. 18d); propodeum largely smooth, but with a few short longitudinal carinae latero- and medio-posteriorly, sparsely setose medially, and densely long setose laterally (Fig. 18d).</p><p>Wings. Fore wing (Fig. 18a): SR1: 3-SR: r = 30: 17: 4; 1-SR+M strongly bent after arising from 1-M; 2-SR: 3-SR: r-m = 8: 17: 8; angle between 1-SR and C+SC+R about 85°; r-m nearly straight; cu-a interstitial. Hind wing (Fig. 18b): SC+R1: 2-SC+R: 1r-m = 11: 3: 7.</p><p>Legs. Length of fore femur: tibia: tarsus = 16: 20: 23; length of hind femur: tibia: basitarsus = 23: 34: 11; length of femur, tibia and basitarsus of hind leg 3.3, 7.8 and 5.5 × their maximum width, respectively; hind tibial spurs 0.4 and 0.5 × as long as hind basitarsus.</p><p>Metasoma. First tergite as long as its apical width, median area convex and coarsely sculptured, with a mediolongitudinal carina posteriorly (Fig. 18e); first tergite with developed lateral carinae, lateral grooves crenulate (Fig. 18e); second tergite largely sculptured (Fig. 18e); apical width of second tergite 2.1 × its median length, triangular medio-basal area of second tergite smooth, bordered a few transverse carinae antero-laterally, and attached to medio-longitudinal carina apically absent near posterior margin of second tergite; antero-lateral areas of second tergite weak and smooth, anterior grooves wide and crenulate (Fig. 18e); second suture wide and deep, crenulate, straight medially (Fig. 18e); third–fifth tergites with some strong punctures, with weak antero-lateral areas, and crenulate transverse subposterior groove (Fig. 18e); sixth and seventh tergites largely smooth; ovipositor sheath 0.6 × as long as fore wing.</p><p>Colour. Head and mesosoma largely reddish yellow (Fig. 17); antenna, eyes, mandible apically (Fig. 18g), and propodeum laterally and medio-basally blackish brown (Fig. 18d); legs and metasoma blackish brown (Figs 18e, 18f); ovipositor sheath black (Fig. 17); wing membrane infuscate, pterostigma and veins brown (Figs 18a, 18b).</p><p>Male. Length of body of male 7.2–7.8 mm, of fore wing of male 6.3–6.8 mm; antenna of male with 44–46 antennomeres; propodeum reddish brown medially or entirely black.</p><p>Biology. The type series has been reared from Semanotus bifasciatus (Motschulsky, 1875) ( Coleoptera: Cerambycidae).</p><p>Distribution. China (Guangdong).</p><p>Etymology. Named “promiscuus” (Latin for “mixed, blended”) because the metasoma shows a combination of different sculpture.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A1844FFB5FF7EE207FEF1FE4A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A1843FFB7FF7EE61BFD85FB56.text	EE15879A1843FFB7FF7EE61BFD85FB56.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campyloneurus quadraticeps Li & Achterberg & Chen 2020	<div><p>Campyloneurus quadraticeps sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 19–20</p><p>Type material. Holotype. CHINA • ♀; Fujian Province, Chong’an Dahe; Oct. 1980; J.Y. Huang leg.; ZJUH 20004241.</p><p>Diagnosis. This new species is very similar to C. promiscuus sp. nov., but can be separated from the latter by the following characters: metasomal tergites with yellowish white spots (metasomal tergites uniformly blackish brown in C. promiscuus); vein 2-SC+R of hind wing relatively long, 0.8 × as long as vein 1r-m (short, 0.4 ×); hypoclypeal depression 1.6 × as wide as malar space (1.2 ×); frons with blackish brown spots (without dark spots); posterior margin of second metasomal tergite smooth (sculptured).</p><p>Description. Holotype, ♀, length of body 5.2 mm, of fore wing 5.9 mm, of ovipositor sheath 3.4 mm.</p><p>Head. Antenna with 42 antennomeres; apical flagellomere acute, 2.5 × longer than its maximum width (Fig. 20k); first flagellomere 1.7 × longer than its maximum width, 1.1 and 1.2 × longer than second and third, respectively, the latter 1.3 × longer than wide; malar suture densely short setose, and with fine punctures (Fig. 20i); clypeus height: inter-tentorial distance: tentorio-ocular distance = 1: 4: 2; clypeus sparsely long setose; eye weakly emarginated (Fig. 20g); face 0.9 × longer than its width, densely long setose, and punctate (Fig. 20g); eye height: shortest distance between eyes: head width = 12: 11: 22; frons largely smooth, concave behind antennal sockets, with a strong median groove (Fig. 20h); vertex largely smooth except for some weak punctures, and with sparse short setae; minimum distance between posterior ocelli: minimum diameter of elliptical posterior ocellus: minimum distance between posterior ocellus and eye = 3: 4: 6; in dorsal view eye twice longer than temple; temples directly narrowed behind eyes (Fig. 20h).</p><p>Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 1.9 × its height (Fig. 20c); notauli impressed anteriorly only (Fig. 20d); mesoscutum largely with sparse long setae (Fig. 20d); scutellar sulcus deep, moderately wide, and with crenulae (Fig. 20d); scutellum with dense short setae posteriorly; metanotum strongly convex medially, and with a short median carina anteriorly (Fig. 20d); propodeum smooth, without longitudinal carinae, sparsely setose medially, and densely long setose laterally (Fig. 20d).</p><p>Wings. Fore wing (Fig. 20a): SR1: 3-SR: r = 38: 21: 5; 1-SR+M distinctly bent after arising from 1-M; 2-SR: 3-SR: r-m = 9: 21: 4; angle between 1-SR and C+SC+R about 80°; r-m straight; cu-a interstitial. Hind wing (Fig. 20b): SC+R1: 2-SC+R: 1r-m = 14: 5: 6.</p><p>Legs. Length of fore femur: tibia: tarsus = 16: 19: 26; length of hind femur: tibia: basitarsus = 25: 36: 38; length of femur, tibia and basitarsus of hind leg 4.1, 8.6 and 9.3 × their maximum width, respectively; hind tibial spurs 0.3 and 0.4 × as long as hind basitarsus.</p><p>Metasoma. Length of first metasomal tergite 1.4 × its apical width, median area convex and sculptured, with a medio-longitudinal carina posteriorly (Fig. 20e); first tergite with developed lateral carinae, lateral grooves sparsely crenulate (Fig. 20e); second tergite largely sculptured, but smooth posteriorly (Fig. 20e); apical width of second tergite 1.9 × its median length, triangular medio-basal area of second tergite smooth, with some oblique carinae connected laterally, and attached with medio-longitudinal carina apically absent near posterior margin of second tergite; antero-lateral areas of second tergite weak and smooth, anterior grooves wide and crenulate (Fig. 20e); second suture wide and deep, crenulate, straight medially (Fig. 20e); third–fifth tergites with antero-lateral areas, and crenulate transverse subposterior groove (Fig. 20e); third–seventh tergites largely smooth except a few weak punctures; ovipositor sheath 0.6 × as long as fore wing.</p><p>Colour. Head and mesosoma largely reddish yellow (Fig. 19); antenna, eyes, mandible apically (Fig. 20g), frons medially and stemmaticum blackish brown (Fig. 20h); metanotum and propodeum yellowish brown (Fig. 20d); fore leg whitish yellow (except yellowish brown claws), middle and hind legs yellowish brown (Fig. 20f); median area of first metasomal tergite blackish brown, remainder ivory (Fig. 20e); second–fifth tergites largely blackish brown, but second tergite laterally, fourth tergite posterior-laterally and fifth tergite posteriorly ivory (Fig. 20e); sixth and seventh tergites ivory (Fig. 20e); wing membrane weakly infuscate, pterostigma and veins brown (Figs 20a, 20b); ovipositor sheath black (Fig. 19).</p><p>Biology. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Fujian).</p><p>Etymology. Named after its rather square-shaped head in anterior view: “quadrus” and “ceps” are Latin for “square” and “head”, respectively.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A1843FFB7FF7EE61BFD85FB56	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A1841FF89FF7EE167FD4CF9EF.text	EE15879A1841FF89FF7EE167FD4CF9EF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campyloneurus robusticella Li & Achterberg & Chen 2020	<div><p>Campyloneurus robusticella sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 21–22</p><p>Type material. Holotype. CHINA • ♀; Hunan Province, Liuyang; 24 Aug. 1985; X.W. Tong leg.; ZJUH 864625.</p><p>Diagnosis. This new species is very similar to C. serenans Enderlein, 1920, but can be separated from the latter by the following characters: ovipositor sheath 0.3 × as long as fore wing (0.7 × as long as fore wing in C. serenans); mesosoma entirely reddish yellow (reddish brown except for mesoscutum and metapleuron black); first metasomal tergite entirely black (black except whitish yellow laterally).</p><p>Description. Holotype, ♀, length of body 7.3 mm, of fore wing 6.3 mm, of ovipositor sheath 2.1 mm.</p><p>Head. Antenna incomplete, with 51 antennomeres remaining; first flagellomere 1.4 × longer than its maximum width, 1.2 and 1.3 × longer than second and third, respectively, the latter 1.2 × longer than wide; malar suture densely short stose (Fig. 22i); clypeus height: inter-tentorial distance: tentorio-ocular distance = 4: 17: 7; clypeus sparsely long setose; eye not emarginated (Fig. 22g); width of hypoclypeal depression 1.2 × its height; length of face 0.9 × its width, coarsely sculptured and densely setose (Fig. 22g); eye height: shortest distance between eyes: head width = 24: 22: 45; frons smooth, weakly concave behind antennal sockets, with a strong median groove (Fig. 22h); vertex smooth, with dense short setae; minimum distance between posterior ocelli: minimum diameter of elliptical posterior ocellus: minimum distance between posterior ocellus and eye = 4: 5: 7; in dorsal view length of eye 1.8 × temple; temples strongly narrowed behind eyes (Fig. 22h).</p><p>Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 1.7 × its height (Fig. 22c); notauli only impressed anteriorly (Fig. 22d); mesoscutum with short setae (Fig. 22d); scutellar sulcus moderately wide and deep, with crenulae (Fig. 22d); scutellum densely short stose posteriorly; metanotum strongly convex medially (Fig. 22d); propodeum smooth without mediolongitudinal carina or groove, with dense long setae (Fig. 22d).</p><p>Wings. Fore wing (Fig. 22a): pterostigma 3.5 × longer than wide; SR1: 3-SR: r = 36: 25: 9; 1-SR+M strongly bent subbasally; 2-SR: 3-SR: r-m = 10: 25: 10; angle between 1-SR and C+SC+R about 80°; cu-a narrowly postfurcal, vertical. Hind wing (Fig. 22b): SC+R1: 2-SC+R: 1r-m = 17: 7: 14.</p><p>Legs. Length of fore femur: tibia: tarsus = 20: 25: 34; length of hind femur: tibia: basitarsus = 32: 46: 17; length of femur, tibia and basitarsus of hind leg 3.6, 9.2 and 5.7 × their maximum width, respectively; hind tibial spurs 0.3 and 0.4 × as long as hind basitarsus.</p><p>Metasoma. Metasomal tergites densely setose; length of first metasomal tergite 1.3 × its apical width, median area convex and coarsely sculptured, with a rather short medio-longitudinal carina posteriorly, lateral grooves crenulate (Fig. 22j); second tergite largely coarsely sculptured, triangular medio-basal area of second tergite rather weakly sculptured, attached to medio-longitudinal carina apically, the latter reaching posterior margin of second tergite (Fig. 22e); apical width of second tergite twice its median length, antero-lateral areas of second tergite rather small and smooth, anterior grooves wide and crenulate (Fig. 22e); second suture wide and deep, crenulate, straight medially (Fig. 22e); apical width of third tergite 3.5 × its median length; third tergite without subposterior groove (Fig. 22e); third–fifth tergites coarsely sculptured, with antero-lateral areas (but of fifth tergite weak) (Fig. 22e); fifth tergite with weak subposterior groove (Fig. 22e); sixth and seventh tergites largely smooth except for a few weak striae and punctures (Fig. 22e); ovipositor sheath 0.3 × as long as fore wing.</p><p>Colour. Largely black (Fig. 21); mandible (except for apically) and labial palp yellow (Fig. 22g); outer margin of eyes, and antennal socket dorsally infuscate (Fig. 22h); mesosoma reddish yellow (Fig. 22e); fore tibia infuscate basally; wing membrane greyish brown, pterostigma and veins dark brown (Figs 22a, 22b).</p><p>Biology. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Hunan).</p><p>Etymology. Named after the robust second submarginal cell of the fore wing: “robustus” and “cella” are Latin for “hard and strong” and “chamber”, respectively.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A1841FF89FF7EE167FD4CF9EF	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A187FFF8CFF7EE2FFFA01FBC2.text	EE15879A187FFF8CFF7EE2FFFA01FBC2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campyloneurus rugifacialis Li & Achterberg & Chen 2020	<div><p>Campyloneurus rugifacialis sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 23–24</p><p>Type material. Holotype. CHINA • ♀; Guangxi Province, Longzhou Nonggang; 20 May 1982; J.H. He leg.; ZJUH 821602 . Paratype. CHINA • 1♀; Yunnan Province, Mengxiu; 2 to 6 May 1981; J.H. He leg.; ZJUH 813133 .</p><p>Diagnosis. This new species is very similar to C. longitergum sp. nov., but can be separated from the latter by the following characters: head and mesosoma uniformly black (head and mesosoma mainly red in C. longitergum); face coarsely rugose (smooth); first metasomal tergite relatively robust, 1.2 × as long as its apical width (less robust, 1.8 ×).</p><p>Description. Holotype, ♀, length of body 6.1 mm, of fore wing 7.1 mm, of ovipositor sheath 2.2 mm.</p><p>Head. Antenna with 52 antennomeres; apical flagellomere acute and spiny apically, 2.6 × longer than its maximum width (Fig. 24k); first flagellomere 1.3 × longer than its maximum width, 1.1 and 1.2 × longer than second and third, respectively, the 1.2 × longer than wide; malar suture weakly sculptured and short setose (Fig. 24i); clypeus height: inter-tentorial distance: tentorio-ocular distance = 3: 9: 4; clypeus sparsely long setose; eye not emarginated (Fig. 24g); width of hypoclypeal depression 1.3 × its height; face 0.9 × longer than wide, coarsely sculptured and densely setose laterally (Fig. 24g); eye height: shortest distance between eyes: head width = 21: 20: 45; frons smooth, weakly concave behind antennal sockets, with a strong median groove (Fig. 24h); vertex smooth, with sparse long setae; minimum distance between posterior ocelli: minimum diameter of elliptical posterior ocellus: minimum distance between posterior ocellus and eye = 8: 9: 15; in dorsal view length of eye 2.0 × temple; temples strongly narrowed behind eyes (Fig. 24h).</p><p>Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 1.8 × its height (Fig. 24c); notauli only impressed anteriorly (Fig. 24d); mesoscutum with dense short setae posteriorly and along notauli (Fig. 24d); scutellar sulcus moderately wide and deep, with sparse crenulae (Fig. 24d); scutellum densely short stose posteriorly and laterally; metanotum strongly convex medially (Fig. 24d); propodeum smooth without medio-longitudinal carina or groove, sparsely setose medially, and densely long setose laterally (Fig. 24d).</p><p>Wings. Fore wing (Fig. 24a): pterostigma 3.7 × longer than wide; SR1: 3-SR: r = 28: 24: 5; 1-SR+M strongly bent subbasally; 2-SR: 3-SR: r-m = 8: 24: 7; angle between 1-SR and C+SC+R about 75°; cu-a interstitial, vertical. Hind wing (Fig. 24b): SC+R1: 2-SC+R: 1r-m = 19: 6: 12.</p><p>Legs. Length of fore femur: tibia: tarsus = 18: 21: 31; length of hind femur: tibia: basitarsus = 27: 40: 13; length of femur, tibia and basitarsus of hind leg 3.6, 8.0 and 4.3 × their maximum width, respectively; hind tibial spurs 0.3 and 0.5 × as long as hind basitarsus.</p><p>Metasoma. Length of first metasomal tergite 1.2 × its apical width, median area convex and coarsely sculptured, with a rather short medio-longitudinal carina posteriorly, lateral grooves crenulate (Fig. 24j); second tergite largely coarsely sculptured, triangular medio-basal area of second tergite smooth, but weakly sculptured posteriorly, attached to medio-longitudinal carina apically, the latter almost reaching posterior margin of second tergite (Fig. 24e); apical width of second tergite twice its median length, antero-lateral areas of second tergite rather small and smooth, anterior grooves wide and crenulate (Fig. 24e); second suture wide and deep, crenulate, nearly straight medially (Fig. 24e); apical width of third tergite 4.3 × its median length; third tergite without subposterior groove (Fig. 24e); third–fifth tergites coarsely sculptured, with antero-lateral areas (but of fifth tergite weak) (Fig. 24e); fourth and fifth tergites with weak subposterior groove (but of fourth tergite absent medially) (Fig. 24e); sixth and seventh tergites largely smooth except for some weak sculpture; ovipositor sheath 0.3 × as long as fore wing.</p><p>Colour. Largely black (Fig. 23); maxillary palp yellow; wing membrane smoky grey, pterostigma and veins dark brown, stigmal spot up to base of vein 1-SR+M (Figs 24a, 24b).</p><p>Variation. Length of body of female 5.1–6.1 mm, of fore wing of female 5.3–7.1 mm, and of ovipositor sheath 2.2–2.5 mm; antenna of female with 46–52 antennomeres; ovipositor sheath 0.3–0.5 × as long as fore wing.</p><p>Biology. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Guangxi, Yunnan).</p><p>Etymology. Named after the rugose face: “ruga” and “facies” are Latin for “wrinkle” and “face”, respectively.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A187FFF8CFF7EE2FFFA01FBC2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A187AFF8FFF7EE093FA98FF47.text	EE15879A187AFF8FFF7EE093FA98FF47.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campyloneurus stigmosus Li & Achterberg & Chen 2020	<div><p>Campyloneurus stigmosus sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 25–26</p><p>Type material. Holotype. CHINA • ♀; Guangdong Province, Guangzhou; 1 Nov. 1989; J.H. He leg.; ZJUH 896611 . Paratype. CHINA • 1♀; Fujian Province, Chong’an Tongmu; 790–1155m; 10 Apr. 1960; G. T. Jin &amp; Y.M. Lin leg.; SHEM 34023744 .</p><p>Diagnosis. This new species is very similar to C. gibbiventris Enderlein, 1920, but can be separated from the latter by the following characters: head and mesosoma mainly black, with ivory spots (head and mesosoma entirely black in C. gibbiventris); fifth tergite coarsely sculptured (smooth); ovipositor shorter, 0.2 × as long as body (0.4 ×); metasomal tergites mainly black, with whitish yellow spots (entirely black); wing membrane smoky grey, pterostigma and veins dark brown (wing membrane, pterostigma and veins blackish brown).</p><p>Description. Holotype, ♀, length of body 4.5 mm, of fore wing 4.8 mm, of ovipositor sheath 0.8 mm.</p><p>Head. Antenna with 40 antennomeres; apical flagellomere acute and weakly protruding apically, 2.4 × longer than its maximum width (Fig. 26l); first flagellomere 1.4 × longer than its maximum width, 1.2 and 1.3 × longer than second and third, respectively, the latter 1.3 × longer than wide; malar suture weakly sculptured and sparsely short setose (Fig. 26i); clypeus height: inter-tentorial distance: tentorio-ocular distance = 3: 13: 6; clypeus sparsely short setose; eye weakly emarginated (Fig. 26g); width of hypoclypeal depression 1.5 × its height; face 0.8 × longer than wide, coarsely punctate and with a few weak striae near eyes, sparsely setose laterally (Fig. 26g); eye height: shortest distance between eyes: head width = 15: 13: 30; frons smooth, weakly concave behind antennal sockets, with a strong median groove (Fig. 26h); vertex smooth, with sparse short setae; minimum distance between posterior ocelli: minimum diameter of elliptical posterior ocellus: minimum distance between posterior ocellus and eye = 7: 7: 10; in dorsal view length of eye twice temple; temples linearly narrowed behind eyes (Fig. 26h).</p><p>Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 1.4 × its height (Fig. 26c); notauli only impressed anteriorly (Fig. 26d); mesoscutum with dense short setae (Fig. 26d); scutellar sulcus narrow and deep, with sparse crenulae (Fig. 26d); scutellum sparsely short setose; metanotum strongly convex medially (Fig. 26d); propodeum smooth, without medio-longitudinal carina or groove, sparsely setose medially, and densely long setose laterally (Fig. 26d).</p><p>Wings. Fore wing (Fig. 26a): pterostigma 3.7 × longer than wide; SR1: 3-SR: r = 31: 22: 5; 1-SR+M rather weakly curved subbasally; 2-SR: 3-SR: r-m = 11: 22: 10; angle between 1-SR and C+SC+R about 75°; cu-a interstitial, vertical. Hind wing (Fig. 26b): SC+R1: 2-SC+R: 1r-m = 6: 2: 3.</p><p>Legs. Length of fore femur: tibia: tarsus = 19: 22: 30; length of hind femur: tibia: basitarsus = 26: 37: 15; length of femur, tibia and basitarsus of hind leg 3.3, 6.7 and 4.9 × their maximum width, respectively; hind tibial spurs 0.4 and 0.5 × as long as hind basitarsus.</p><p>Metasoma. Length of first metasomal tergite 0.9 × its apical width, median area convex and coarsely sculptured, without medio-longitudinal carina posteriorly, lateral grooves sparsely crenulate (Fig. 26j); second tergite largely coarsely sculptured, triangular medio-basal area smooth (but with some crenulae at outer margin), attached to medio-longitudinal carina apically, the latter not reaching posterior margin of second tergite (Fig. 26e); apical width of second tergite 2.4 × its median length, antero-lateral areas of second tergite rather small and smooth, anterior grooves wide and with weak sparse crenulae apically (Fig. 26e); second suture wide and deep, crenulate, nearly straight medially (Fig. 26e); apical width of third tergite 3.6 × its median length; third–fifth tergites coarsely sculptured, with antero-lateral areas (fifth tergite weak) and subposterior groove (Fig. 26e); sixth and seventh tergites largely smooth; ovipositor sheath 0.2 × as long as fore wing.</p><p>Colour. Largely black (Fig. 25); frons laterally (up to eyes), face laterally, area surrounding malar suture, posterior half of middle lobe of mesoscutum, mesopleuron anteriorly and scutellum white or ivory (Figs 26c, 26d, 26g, 26h); first metasomal tergite (except for median area), second tergite laterally (except posteriorly), third tergite antero-laterally and posteriorly, fourth–seventh tergites posteriorly whitish yellow (Fig. 26e); wing membrane smoky grey, pterostigma and veins dark brown (Figs 26a, 26b).</p><p>Variation. Length of body of female 4.5–6.0 mm, of fore wing of female 4.8–6.2 mm, and of ovipositor sheath 0.8–1.0 mm; length of mesosoma 1.5 × its height; spots of head pale yellow in paratype; pronotum laterally and lateral lobes of mesoscutum anteriorly whitish yellow or black.</p><p>Biology. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Fujian, Guangdong).</p><p>Etymology. Named after the multiple spots of the head: “stigmosus” is Latin for “full of marks”.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A187AFF8FFF7EE093FA98FF47	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A1879FF81FF7EE517FDBDFBC2.text	EE15879A1879FF81FF7EE517FDBDFBC2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campyloneurus tergipunctatus Li & Achterberg & Chen 2020	<div><p>Campyloneurus tergipunctatus sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 27–28</p><p>Type material. Holotype. CHINA • ♀; Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna Mengla; 620–650m; light trap; 12 Jul. 1959; F.J. Pu leg.; IZCAS IOZ (E)1964627 . Paratypes. CHINA • 1♀; sama data as holotype; IZCAS IOZ (E) 1964631 • 1♀; Yunnan Province, Simao; 1500m; 24 Apr. 1982; G. T. Jin leg.; SHEM 34005151 .</p><p>Diagnosis. This new species is very similar to C. kirbyi (Cameron, 1905), but can be separated from the latter by the following characters: flagellomeres of antenna blackish brown, scapus and pedicel with a black brown stripe on outer side, respectively (antenna entirely black in C. kirbyi); ovipositor sheath 0.3–0.4 × as long as fore wing (0.6–0.8 ×); first metasomal tergite without medio-longitudinal carina posteriorly (with medio-longitudinal carina posteriorly); face coarsely punctate (irregularly rugose); median groove of frons less deep (very deep and clearly defined).</p><p>Description. Holotype, ♀, length of body 8.7 mm, of fore wing 9.3 mm, of ovipositor sheath 3.8 mm.</p><p>Head. Antenna incomplete, with 75 antennomeres remaining; first flagellomere 1.1 × longer than its maximum width, 1.1 and 1.2 × longer than second and third, respectively, the latter 0.9 × longer than wide; malar suture sparsely long stose (Fig. 28i); clypeus height: inter-tentorial distance: tentorio-ocular distance = 5: 9: 6; clypeus sparsely short setose; eye weakly emarginated (Fig. 28g); width of hypoclypeal depression 1.3 × its height; face 0.9 × longer than wide, coarsely densely punctate and densely long setose (Fig. 28g); eye height: shortest distance between eyes: head width = 22: 17: 40; frons smooth, weakly concave behind antennal sockets, with a median groove (Fig. 28h); vertex smooth, with sparse short setae; minimum distance between posterior ocelli: minimum diameter of elliptical posterior ocellus: minimum distance between posterior ocellus and eye = 5: 4: 8; in dorsal view length of eye 2.2 × temple; temples linearly narrowed behind eyes (Fig. 28h).</p><p>Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 1.7 × its height (Fig. 28c); notauli only impressed anteriorly (Fig. 28d); mesoscutum with sparse short setae (Fig. 28d); scutellar sulcus narrow and deep, with crenulae (Fig. 28d); scutellum short setose posteriorly; metanotum strongly convex medially (Fig. 28d); propodeum largely smooth except for a few rather weak longitudinal striae medially and sparse punctures laterally, without medio-longitudinal carina or groove, glabrous medially, and densely long setose laterally (Fig. 28d).</p><p>Wings. Fore wing (Fig. 28a): pterostigma 3.9 × longer than wide; SR1: 3-SR: r = 26: 21: 5; 1-SR+M rather strongly curved subbasally; 2-SR: 3-SR: r-m = 9: 21: 8; angle between 1-SR and C+SC+R about 85°; cu-a weakly postfurcal, slightly oblique anteriorly. Hind wing (Fig. 28b): SC+R1: 2-SC+R: 1r-m = 25: 4: 15.</p><p>Legs. Length of fore femur: tibia: tarsus = 26: 31: 37; length of hind femur: tibia: basitarsus = 38: 59: 22; length of femur, tibia and basitarsus of hind leg 3.8, 9.8 and 5.5 × their maximum width, respectively; hind tibial spurs 0.4 and 0.5 × as long as hind basitarsus.</p><p>Metasoma. Length of first metasomal tergite 0.9 × its apical width, median area convex and coarsely sculptured, without medio-longitudinal carina posteriorly, lateral grooves crenulate (Fig. 28j); second tergite largely coarsely sculptured, triangular medio-basal area of second tergite weakly rugose, attached with medio-longitudinal carina apically, the latter not reaching posterior margin of second tergite (Fig. 28e); apical width of second tergite 1.7 × its median length, antero-lateral areas of second tergite rather small and smooth, anterior grooves wide and with weak sparse crenulae (Fig. 28e); second suture wide and deep, crenulate, weakly curved medially (Fig. 28e); apical width of third tergite 3.6 × its median length; third and fourth tergites coarsely sculptured (fourth tergite densely punctate laterally), with distinct antero-lateral areas, oblique anterior grooves and subposterior groove with crenulae (Fig. 28e); fifth tergite sparsely punctate (Fig. 28e); sixth and seventh tergites largely smooth; ovipositor sheath 0.4 × as long as fore wing.</p><p>Colour. Largely yellow (Fig. 27); flagellomeres of antenna and mandible apically blackish brown (Fig. 28g); scapus and pedicel with a black brown stripe on outer side, respectively (Fig. 28i); wing membrane yellowish, but infuscate apically, stigmal spot dark brown, up to base of vein 1-SR+M, pterostigma yellow, but apical third dark brown, basal veins yellow (vein 1-SR+M dark brown subbasally), and apical veins brownish yellow (Figs 28a, 28b).</p><p>Variation. Length of body of female 8.7–9.5 mm, of fore wing of female 9.3–11.0 mm, and of ovipositor sheath 3.7–4.0 mm; vein SR1 of fore wing 1.3–1.4 × vein 3-SR; vein SC+R1 of hind wing 1.2–1.5 × vein 1r-m; ovipositor sheath 0.3–0.4 × as long as fore wing; sometimes scapus brownish yellow ventrally or entirely blackish brown.</p><p>Biology. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Yunnan).</p><p>Etymology. Named after the punctate fourth and fifth tergites: “tergum” and “punctum” are Latin for “back” and “small hole, dot”, respectively.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A1879FF81FF7EE517FDBDFBC2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A1877FF82FF7EE093FBBBFDA6.text	EE15879A1877FF82FF7EE093FBBBFDA6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Iphiaulax Foerster 1863	<div><p>Genus Iphiaulax Foerster, 1863</p><p>Figs 29–46, 48</p><p>Type species: Ichneumon impostor Scopoli, 1763 (Monobasic and original designation).</p><p>Iphiaulax Foerster, 1863: 235; Tobias &amp; Belokobylskij. 2000: 179; Whitaker et al., 2007: 14.</p><p>Aniphiaulax Kokujev, 1899 in 1898: 408. Type species: Vipio (Aniphiaulax) jakowlewi Kokujev, 1899 (Monobasic) . Synonymized by Szépligeti, 1904: 149.</p><p>Iphiaulacidea Fahringer, 1926: 581, for Iphiaulax s. s. under Iphiaulax s. l. Type species: Ichneumon impostor Scopoli, 1763 (designed by Muesebeck &amp; Walkley, 1951: 158). Synonymized by Fahringer, 1928: 592.</p><p>Diagnosis. Body medium-sized to large; antenna densely setose, longer than fore wing, and with 50–100 antennomeres, rarely less; terminal flagellomere usually acute apically, median flagellomeres usually wider than long, scapus often robust and ovoid, scapus in lateral view basally rounded and at inner side usually with narrow apical ledge, rarely as a double apical margin ( I. ameeni: Fig. 30h), ventrally longer than dorsally and concave apically; eye glabrous, not or rather weakly emarginated; face often largely smooth, sometimes punctate, or with lateral sculpture; clypeus moderately wide and usually with dorsal carina; malar suture often developed, but sometimes weak; labiomaxillary complex normal, not elongate; frons not or weakly concave behind antennal sockets, with distinct median groove; notauli usually only impressed anteriorly; precoxal suture absent; mesopleural suture smooth; propodeum smooth, rarely with short carina posteriorly; angle between veins 1-SR and C+SC+R of fore wing more than 50°; vein 1-SR+M of fore wing more or less straight, rarely weakly curved; fore wing vein 3-SR relatively long, often more than twice longer than vein r-m; fore wing vein r-m usually weakly curved and with 2 bullae; fore wing vein cu-a interstitial or finely postfurcal; fore wing vein 3-CU1 not or only weakly expanded posteriorly; hind wing vein 1r-m often shorter than vein SC+R1 (rarely longer, only in some Indo-Australian species); hind wing basally often with some setae around vein cu-a; claws simple; legs more or less densely setose; metasomal tergites largely smooth or first–third metasomal tergite largely sculptured; first metasomal tergite with convex median area, medio-longitudinal carina present or absent; second tergite without medio-basal area, antero-lateral areas indistinct to developed; second suture usually crenulate, rarely smooth; third metasomal tergite often with antero-lateral areas; subposterior transverse groove of third–fifth tergites usually absent, but sometimes present; sixth and seventh tergites largely smooth; ovipositor usually robust and its upper valve often strongly enlarged and without nodus and at least twice wider than lower valve in lateral view, but sometimes slender, subapically upper valve without nodus, and its lower valve without distinct ventral teeth, rarely minute teeth present.</p><p>Biology. Most species are idiobiont ectoparasitoids of concealed larvae of Coleoptera ( Buprestidae and Cerambycidae) and of Lepidoptera ( Cossidae, Psychidae and Pyralidae) (Whitaker et al. 2007; Yu et al. 2016).</p><p>Distribution. Cosmopolitan. The distribution of Chinese species see Fig. 48.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A1877FF82FF7EE093FBBBFDA6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A1874FF83FF7EE636FA00FD02.text	EE15879A1874FF83FF7EE636FA00FD02.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Iphiaulax Foerster	<div><p>Key to Chinese species of the genus Iphiaulax Foerster</p><p>1. Pterostigma yellow, at most black apically (Figs 30a, 32a, 38a, 42a, 46a); wing membrane at least partly yellow or brown, and sometimes with black spots (Figs 30a, 30b, 32a, 32b, 38a, 38b, 42a, 42b, 46a, 46b); body often yellow with black spots (Figs 29, 31, 37, 41, 45)..................................................................................... 2</p><p>- Pterostigma often blackish brown or brown (Figs 34a, 36a, 40a, 44a), if pterostigma yellow (except black basal spot), then wing membrane at most slightly pigmented, nearly hyaline and without dark spots (Figs 34a, 34b, 36a, 36b, 40a, 40b, 44a, 44b); body colour varies from red, yellow with spots to mainly black.................................................... 10</p><p>2. Wing membrane mainly yellow, with apical margin grayish brown, and fore wing with black spots; vein 1-SR+M of fore wing bent basally................................................................ I. horishanus Matsumura, 1912</p><p>- Basal half of wing membrane yellow and apical half blackish brown (Figs 30a, 30b, 32a, 32b, 38a, 38b, 42a, 42b, 46a, 46b); vein 1-SR+M of fore wing straight, bent or curved............................................. 3</p><p>3. First to second metasomal tergites yellow, and third to seventh metasomal tergites black (Figs 30e, 32e); vein 1-SR+M of fore wing curved (Figs 30a, 32a); third metasomal tergite at least sculptured medially (Figs 30e, 32e); fourth to fifth metasomal tergites with transverse subposterior groove (Figs 30e, 32e).................................................... 4</p><p>- Metasomal tergites entirely yellow (Figs 42e, 46e) or black (Fig. 38e); vein 1-SR+M of fore wing straight, bent or curved; third metasomal tergite smooth or sculptured; fourth to fifth metasomal tergites with or without transverse subposterior groove.. 5</p><p>4. Head yellow with black dorsal marking not reaching eye orbits, narrowing posteriorly to form a point (Fig. 30h); vein 2-SC+R of hind wing transverse (Fig. 30b); pterostigma mainly yellow, only its apical fifth black (Fig. 30a).............................................................................. I. ameeni Whitaker, Bhuiya, Fitton &amp; Quicke, 2007</p><p>- Head with black dorsal marking reaching eye orbits (Fig. 32h); vein 2-SC+R of hind wing longitudinal (Fig. 32b); basal half of pterostigma yellow and its apical half black (Fig. 32a)............................. I. haundrawensis Cameron, 1907</p><p>5. Metasomal tergites uniformly black (Fig. 38e); hind leg black (Fig. 38f); first and second metasomal tergites sculptured, third to seventh metasomal tergites smooth (Figs 38e); vein SC+R1 of hind wing shorter than vein 1r-m (Figs 38b)............................................................................................... I. longinervis sp. nov.</p><p>- Metasomal tergites uniformly yellow (Figs 42e, 46e); hind leg at least partly yellow (Figs 42f, 46f); third metasomal tergite smooth or sculptured; vein SC+R1 of hind wing shorter or longer than vein 1r-m................................... 6</p><p>6. Vein 1-SR+M of fore wing curved or bent (Fig. 42a); fourth to fifth metasomal tergites without transverse subposterior groove (Fig. 42e)........................................................................................... 7</p><p>- Vein 1-SR+M of fore wing straight (Fig. 46a); fourth to fifth metasomal tergites with or without transverse subposterior groove.............................................................................................. 8</p><p>7. Third metasomal tergite smooth; mesoscutum without black spots; fore wing vein cu-a postfurcal; hind tarsus yellow................................................................................... I. agraensis (Cameron, 1897)</p><p>- Third metasomal tergite sculptured (Fig. 42e); posterior part of median lobe and lateral lobes of mesoscutum with black spots (Fig. 42d); fore wing vein cu-a interstitial (Fig. 42a); hind tarsus largely dark brown (Fig. 42f)..................................................................................................... I. stramineus Cameron, 1907</p><p>8. Third metasomal tergite smooth (Fig. 46e); third to fifth metasomal tergites without transverse subposterior groove (Fig. 46e)...................................................................... I. zebripterae (Wang &amp; Chen, 2008)</p><p>- Third metasomal tergite sculptured; third to fifth metasomal tergites with transverse subposterior groove................ 9</p><p>9. Ovipositor robust and distinctly expanded preapically; lateral sulcus of first metasomal tergite smooth; fore wing vein cu-a postfurcal; apical half of pterostigma brown......................................... I. malayanus Cameron, 1901</p><p>- Ovipositor not expanded preapically; lateral sulcus of first metasomal tergite crenulate; fore wing vein cu-a interstitial; apical half of pterostigma yellow................................................. I. garampianus (Matsumura, 1912)</p><p>10. Metasomal tergites entirely smooth and second metasomal suture crenulate; wing membrane light coloured, nearly hyaline, pterostigma yellow, except black spot basally; body red or yellowish brown................ I. jakowlewi (Kokujev, 1898)</p><p>- Second metasomal tergite often sculptured medially and at least second metasomal suture crenulate (Figs 34e, 36e, 40e, 44e); wing membrane grayish brown and subhyaline, or blackish brown, with pale stripe from base of pterostigma to vein 2-SR+M and r-m (Figs 34a, 36a, 40a, 44a); body red or yellow, and with black spots (Figs 33, 35, 39, 43)..................... 11</p><p>11. Body yellow with black spots (Figs 33, 43); fourth and fifth metasomal tergites without transverse subposterior groove (Figs 34e, 44e)........................................................................................... 12</p><p>- Body red with black spots (Figs 35, 39); fourth and fifth metasomal tergites with transverse subposterior groove (Figs 36e, 40e)............................................................................................... 13</p><p>12. In dorsal view length of eye 2.1 × temple (Fig. 44h); vein 2-SC+R of hind wing about 0.7 × as long as vein 1r-m (Fig. 44b); third metasomal tergite with few deep punctures medially (Fig. 44e)................ I. wuhainensis Wang &amp; Chen, 2008</p><p>- In dorsal view length of eye 1.3–1.5 × temple (Fig. 34h); vein 2-SC+R of hind wing about 0.5 × as long as vein 1r-m (Fig. 34b); third metasomal tergite smooth medially (Fig. 34e).................................... I. impeditor (Kokujev, 1898)</p><p>13. Second metasomal tergite smooth and with weak lateral grooves, reaching middle of tergite, and without antero-lateral areas; head mainly red; mesosoma red, and without black spots.................................. I. sauteri Enderlein, 1920</p><p>- Second metasomal tergite at least medially largely sculptured, and with strong lateral grooves enbclosing antero-lateral areas (Figs 36e, 40e); head mainly black (Figs 36g, 36h, 40g, 40h); mesosoma with or without black spots.................. 14</p><p>14. Ovipositor distinctly expanded preapically, and strongly curved downward (Fig. 40k)............ I. mactator (Klug, 1817)</p><p>- Ovipositor parallel-sided to moderately expanded preapically and not or weakly curved (Fig. 36k).................... 15</p><p>15. Wing membrane yellowish brown; second metasomal tergite slightly longer than third metasomal tergite, approximately the same length laterally; middle lobe and lateral lobes of mesoscutum with black spot............ I. bellator (Kokujev, 1898)</p><p>- Wing membrane blackish brown (Figs 36a, 36b); second metasomal tergite distinctly longer than third metasomal tergite, also laterally (Fig. 36e); colour of mesoscutum varies from uniformly red to uniformly black to reddish with black spots (Fig. 35).............................................................................. I. impostor (Scopoli, 1763)</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A1874FF83FF7EE636FA00FD02	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A1875FF83FF7EE752FE07FBE1.text	EE15879A1875FF83FF7EE752FE07FBE1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Iphiaulax agraensis (Cameron 1897)	<div><p>Iphiaulax agraensis (Cameron, 1897)</p><p>Bracon agraensis Cameron, 1897: 34 .</p><p>Aniphiaulax agraensis (Cameron): van Achterberg &amp; O’Toole, 1993: 9.</p><p>Iphiaulax agraensis (Cameron): Whitaker et al., 2007: 18.</p><p>Biology. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Guangdong); Bangladesh; India; Laos.</p><p>Note Whitaker et al. (2007) reported that this species from Guangdong (SE China), but no specimens were available for our study.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A1875FF83FF7EE752FE07FBE1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A1875FF83FF7EE0F2FD78F9B7.text	EE15879A1875FF83FF7EE0F2FD78F9B7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Iphiaulax ameeni Whitaker, Bhuiya, Fitton & Quicke 2007	<div><p>Iphiaulax ameeni Whitaker, Bhuiya, Fitton &amp; Quicke, 2007</p><p>Figs 29–30</p><p>Iphiaulax ameeni Whitaker, Bhuiya, Fitton &amp; Quicke in Whitaker et al., 2007: 18 .</p><p>Material. CHINA— Guangxi Province • 1♀; Lingui Wantian; 260m; 1 Jul. 1963; C.G. Wang leg.; IZCAS IOZ (E) 1964625.</p><p>Biology. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Guangxi, Taiwan).</p><p>Note. This species new to Guangxi (SW China).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A1875FF83FF7EE0F2FD78F9B7	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A1875FF83FF7EE204FEFEF818.text	EE15879A1875FF83FF7EE204FEFEF818.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Iphiaulax bellator (Kokujev 1898)	<div><p>Iphiaulax bellator (Kokujev, 1898)</p><p>Vipio (Iphiaulax) bellator Kokujev, 1898: 402 .</p><p>Iphiaulax bellator (Kokujev): Szépligeti, 1906: 583; Shenefelt, 1978: 1753; Tobias &amp; Belokobylskij, 2000: 180.</p><p>Iphiaulacidea bellator (Kokujev): Fahringer, 1926: 198.</p><p>Biology. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Gansu); Hungary; Korea; Mongolia.</p><p>Note. The type specimens of this species were collected from Gansu (NW China), but no specimens were available for our study .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A1875FF83FF7EE204FEFEF818	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A1872FF84FF7EE4CAFC92FE5A.text	EE15879A1872FF84FF7EE4CAFC92FE5A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Iphiaulax garampianus (Matsumura 1912)	<div><p>Iphiaulax garampianus (Matsumura, 1912)</p><p>Glyptomorpha garampiana Matsumura, 1912: 156</p><p>Iphiaulax garampianus (Matsumura): Matsumura, 1931: 145; Watanabe, 1937: 23; Shenefelt, 1978: 1766; You et al., 1990: 25; Tobias &amp; Belokobylskij, 2000: 181; Wang et al., 2008: 187.</p><p>Biology. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Guangxi, Taiwan).</p><p>Note. The type series of this species originates from Taiwan and You et al. (1990) reported this species from Guangxi, but no specimens were available for our study .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A1872FF84FF7EE4CAFC92FE5A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A1870FF86FF7EE4CAFF6DFDE9.text	EE15879A1870FF86FF7EE4CAFF6DFDE9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Iphiaulax haundrawensis Cameron 1907	<div><p>Iphiaulax haundrawensis Cameron, 1907</p><p>Figs 31–32</p><p>Iphiaulax haundrawensis Cameron, 1907: 171; Ramakrishna Ayyar, 1924: 353; Dover, 1925: 40; Whitaker et al., 2007: 22. Hybogaster haundrawensis (Cameron): Baltazar, 1972: 268; He et al., 2002: 882; Wang et al., 2008: 183.</p><p>Material. CHINA— Yunnan Province • 1♀; Xishuangbanna Xiaomengyang; 850m; 16 Jun. 1957; L.C. Zang leg.; IZCAS IOZ (E) 1964517 • 1♀; Xishuangbanna Xiaomengyang; 850m; 22 Oct. 1957; S.Y. Wang leg.; IZCAS IOZ (E) 1964516.— Hainan Province • 1♀; Jianfengling; 29 Apr. 1983; M.B. Gu leg.; IZCAS IOZ (E) 1964613.</p><p>Biology. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Hainan, Yunnan); India; Laos; Myanmar; Thailand.</p><p>Note. This species is new to Yunnan (SW China); Dover (1925) and He et al. (2002) listed this species from Hainan.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A1870FF86FF7EE4CAFF6DFDE9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A1870FF86FF7EE2F5FC76F867.text	EE15879A1870FF86FF7EE2F5FC76F867.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Iphiaulax horishanus Matsumura 1912	<div><p>Iphiaulax horishanus Matsumura, 1912</p><p>Iphiaulax horishana Matsumura, 1912: 156, 1931: 142 .</p><p>Ipobracon horishanus (Matsumura): Watanabe, 1937: 19; Shenefelt, 1978: 1820; Chou, 1981: 73.</p><p>Biology. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Taiwan).</p><p>Note. The type series of this species was collected in Taiwan. Watanabe (1937) and Chou (1981) repeated Taiwan as only known distribution. No specimens were available for our study.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A1870FF86FF7EE2F5FC76F867	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A186EFF98FF7EE4CAFE0FFC16.text	EE15879A186EFF98FF7EE4CAFE0FFC16.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Iphiaulax impeditor (Kokujev 1898)	<div><p>Iphiaulax impeditor (Kokujev, 1898)</p><p>Figs 33–34</p><p>Vipio (Iphiaulax) impeditor Kokujev, 1898: 399 .</p><p>Iphiaulax impeditor (Kokujev): Szépligeti, 1904: 22, 1906: 583; Tobias, 1971: 206; Tobias &amp; Belokobylskij, 2000: 181; Wang et al., 2008: 187.</p><p>Iphiaulax (Iphiaulacidea) impeditor (Kokujev): Fahringer, 1926: 202.</p><p>Iphiaulax (Euglyptobracon) impeditor (Kokujev): Telenga, 1936: 105; Tobias, 1954: 422.</p><p>Glyptomorpha impeditor (Kokujev): Papp, 1960: 372.</p><p>Material. CHINA— Liaoning Province • 1³; Shenyang; 27 Jul. 1990; G.S. Liu leg.; ZJUH 9611559 • 3³³; Shen-yang Dongling; 10 Jul. 1994; J.X. Lou leg.; ZJUH 947416, 947439, 947153 • 1♀ 3³³; Dalian; 16 Aug. 1994; J.X. Lou leg.; ZJUH 952162, 952236, 952307, 952163 • 1♀; Suizhong; Jun. 1993; J.X. Lou leg.; ZJUH 976281 .— Beijing • 1♀; Xiangshan Yingtaogou; 6 Jul. 1992; M.S. Zhao leg.; ZJUH 20004422 • 1♀; Xiangshan Yingtaogou; 7 Jul. 1992; N.Q. Lin leg.; ZJUH 20004377 .— Shandong Province • 2♀♀ 6³³; Laoshan; 2 Aug. 1995; P. Cai leg.; ZJUH 958396, 958400, 958466, 958223, 958239, 958259, 958184, 958190 .— Shaanxi Province • 1♀; Qinling Tiantaishan; 3 Sep. 1999; J.H. He leg.; ZJUH 990600 .— Zhejiang Province • 1♀ 1³; Hangzhou; 30 Jun. 1987; col-lector unkown; ZJUH 872017, 872018 .</p><p>Biology. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Beijing, Liaoning, Shaanxi, Shandong, Zhejiang); Azerbaijan; former Czechoslovakia; Georgia; Iran; Kazakhstan; Lithuania; Moldova; Russia; Slovakia; Turkey.</p><p>Note. This species is new to Shaanxi and Zhejiang. Wang et al. (2008) reported this species from Beijing, Liaoning and Shandong.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A186EFF98FF7EE4CAFE0FFC16	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A186CFF9CFF7EE4CAFBA0FEFE.text	EE15879A186CFF9CFF7EE4CAFBA0FEFE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Iphiaulax impostor (Scopoli 1763)	<div><p>Iphiaulax impostor (Scopoli, 1763)</p><p>Figs 35–36</p><p>Ichneumon impostor Scopoli, 1763: 287 .</p><p>Bracon impostor (Scopoli): Nees, 1819: 304, 1834: 93; Thomson, 1892: 1801; Marshall, 1900: 6.</p><p>Iphiaulax impostor (Scopoli): Foerster, 1863: 234; Dalla Torre, 1898: 298; Szépligeti, 1904: 22, 1906: 583; Telenga, 1936: 113; Chu, 1937: 71; Watanabe, 1937: 22; Papp, 1960: 380; Tobias, 1967 (1968): 18, 1971: 70; Chu et al., 1978: 51; Shenefelt, 1978: 1769; Tobias &amp; Belokobylskij, 2000: 181; Wang et al., 2008: 187.</p><p>Bracon (Vipio) impostor (Scopoli): Thomson, 1892: 1801.</p><p>Bracon (Iphiaulax) impostor (Scopoli): Mantero, 1904: 19.</p><p>Vipio impostor (Scopoli): Graeffe, 1908: 140; Hackwitz, 1910: 238.</p><p>Iphiaulax (Iphiaulacidea) impostor (Scopoli): Fahringer, 1926: 203.</p><p>Ichneumon coccineus Fourcroy, 1785: 417 . Synonymized by Dalla Torre, 1898: 298.</p><p>Ichneumon incertus Christ, 1791: 371 . Synonymized by Dalla Torre, 1898: 298.</p><p>Cynips ignota Christ, 1791: 475 . Synonymized by Dalla Torre, 1898: 298.</p><p>Iphiaulax carissimus Shestakov, 1927: 206 . Synonymized by Tobias, 1971: 70.</p><p>Iphiaulax infuscatus Shestakov, 1927: 205 . Synonymized by Telenga, 1936: 113.</p><p>Iphiaulax parvulus Shestakov, 1927: 207 . Synonymized by Tobias, 1971: 70.</p><p>Iphiaulax parvulus sibiricus Shestakov, 1927: 208 . Synonymized by Tobias, 1971: 70.</p><p>Iphiaulax senex Shestakov, 1927: 208 . Synonymized by Tobias, 1971: 70.</p><p>Iphiaulax pulchellus Telenga, 1936: 336 . Synonymized by Tobias, 1986: 179.</p><p>Material. CHINA— Liaoning Province • 1♀ 1³; Shenyang; 31 Aug. 1982; H. Wei leg.; ZJUH 835217 • 2³³; Shenyang Dongling; 1 May 1959; collector unkown; host: Saperda carcharias (Linnaeus); ZJUH No. 5909. 1 • 1♀ 1³; Shenyang Dongling; 10 Jul. 1994; J.X. Lou leg.; ZJUH 947385, 947763 • 2³³; Huxin; 16 to 23 Aug. 1996; J.X. Lou leg.; ZJUH 961251, 961254 .— Jilin Province • 2♀♀; Songhuahu; Sep. to Oct. 1985; M.H. Tang leg.; ZJUH 860004 (two specimens) • 1♀; Hunchun; 5 Jun. 1982; C. R . Piao leg.; ZJUH 861139 • 1♀; Helong; 20 Jul. 1982; C.F. Jin leg.; ZJUH 861136 .— Nei Menggu Province • 1♀; Wumengchayouzhongqi; 24 Aug. 1978; collec-tor unkown; ZJUH 200012244 .— Shandong Province • 1♀ 3³³; Tai’an Taishan; 17 Jun. 1997; Q. Li leg.; ZJUH 955210, 955211, 200011159, 200011161 • 1♀ 2³³; Tai’an Taishan; 22 Jun. 2000; Y.L. Zhang; ZJUH • 1♀; Taishan Puzhaoshi; 22 Jun. 2000; Q.L. Zhang; ZJUH • 1♀; Taishan Puzhaoshi; 22 Jun. 2000; J. Wang &amp; Y. R . Liu; ZJUH ; 1♀; Taishan Puzhaoshi; 13 Jul. 2000; G. Fu &amp; Y.Q. Pan; ZJUH .— Shanxi Province • 1♀; Huata; 1972; collector unkown; ZJUH 780715 • 1♀; Yanbei; 1982; R . L. Zhao leg.; host: larva of Saperda populnea (Linnaeus); ZJUH 824866 . – Xinjiang Province • 1³; Pishan; 17 Jul. 1991; J.H. He leg.; ZJUH 912506 • 1♀; Shihezi; 30 Aug. 1981; F.D. He leg.; ZJUH 820017 .— Yunnan Province • 1³; Kunming; 30 Mar. 1981; J.H. He leg.; ZJUH 811126 .— Zhejiang Province • 1³; Changxing; 2 May 1935; D. Piel leg.; ZJUH .</p><p>Biology. The hosts are mainly species of Buprestidae and Cerambycidae (Coleoptera), plus two species of Cossidae (Lepidoptera) (Yu et al. 2016); in China reared from larva of Saperda populnea (Linnaeus, 1758) and S. carcharias (Linnaeus, 1758) ( Coleoptera: Cerambycidae).</p><p>Distribution. China (Henan, Hubei, Jiangsu, Jiangxi, Jilin, Liaoning, Nei Menggu, Shaanxi, Shandong, Shanxi, Xinjiang, Yunnan, Zhengjiang); Afrotropical; Oriental; Palaearctic (Yu et al. 2016).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A186CFF9CFF7EE4CAFBA0FEFE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A186AFF9CFF7EE5DAFF47FCB7.text	EE15879A186AFF9CFF7EE5DAFF47FCB7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Iphiaulax jakowlewi (Kokujev 1898)	<div><p>Iphiaulax jakowlewi (Kokujev, 1898)</p><p>Vipio (Aniphiaulax) jakowlewi Kokujev, 1898: 408 .</p><p>Iphiaulax jakowlewi (Kokujev): Szépligeti, 1904: 149.</p><p>Iphiaulax (Aniphiaulax) jakowlewi (Kokujev): Fahringer, 1926: 219; Tobias &amp; Belokobylskij, 2000: 179.</p><p>Aniphiaulax jakowlewi (Kokujev): Telenga, 1936: 118; Shenefelt, 1978: 1748; Wang et al., 2008: 182.</p><p>Iphiaulax (Iphiaulax) jakowlewi (Kokujev): Tobias, 1986: 179.</p><p>Biology. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Gansu); Bangladesh; India; Laos.</p><p>Note. Kokujev (1898) reported this species from Gansu (NW China), but no specimens were available for our study.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A186AFF9CFF7EE5DAFF47FCB7	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A186AFF9EFF7EE709FDD7FA8E.text	EE15879A186AFF9EFF7EE709FDD7FA8E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Iphiaulax longinervis Li & Achterberg & Chen 2020	<div><p>Iphiaulax longinervis sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 37–38</p><p>Type material. Holotype. CHINA • ♀; Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna Xiaomengyang; 850m; 18 Aug.1957; Y. R. Zhang leg.; IZCAS IOZ (E)1964515 . Paratype. CHINA • 1♀; Yunnan Province, near Jingdong; 1300m; 17 Mar. 1957; Bangfeiluofu leg.; IZCAS IOZ (E) 1964595.</p><p>Diagnosis. This new species is very similar to I. agraensis Cameron, 1897, but can be separated from the latter by the following characters: head yellow with black dorsal marking not reaching eye orbits (reaching eye orbits in I. agraensis); metasomal tergites uniformly black (uniformly yellow); hind leg mainly black (yellow); hind wing vein 1r-m 1.1–1.2 × as long as vein SC+R1 (0.9 ×).</p><p>Description. Holotype, ♀, length of body 15.8 mm, of fore wing 14.0 mm, of ovipositor sheath 2.0 mm.</p><p>Head. Antenna with 94 antennomeres; apical flagellomere acute, 2.8 × longer than its maximum width (Fig. 38l); first flagellomere 0.9 × longer than its maximum width, 1.2 and 1.3 × longer than second and third, respectively, the latter 0.8 × longer than its maximum width; malar suture developed and densely short setose (Fig. 38i); clypeus height: inter-tentorial distance: tentorio-ocular distance = 4: 9: 7; clypeus sparsely short setose; eye weakly emarginated (Fig. 38g); width of hypoclypeal depression twice its height; face 0.7 × longer than wide, largely smooth, with some punctures and long setae (Fig. 38g); eye height: shortest distance between eyes: head width = 17: 21: 40; frons smooth, weakly concave behind antennal sockets, with a strong median groove (Fig. 38h); vertex largely glabrous except for some sparse short setae; minimum distance between posterior ocelli: minimum diameter of elliptical posterior ocellus: minimum distance between posterior ocellus and eye = 4: 3: 10; in dorsal view length of eye 1.9 × temple (Fig. 38h).</p><p>Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 2.1 × its height (Fig. 38c); notauli only impressed anteriorly (Fig. 38d); middle lobe of mesoscutum weakly convex; mesoscutum largely glabrous, but with some short setae along notauli (Fig. 38d); scutellar sulcus narrow, with a few rather weak crenulae (Fig. 38d); scutellum with dense short setae posteriorly; metanotum strongly convex medially (Fig. 38d); propodeum glabrous medially, without medio-longitudinal carina or groove, sparsely punctate and densely long setose laterally (Fig. 38d).</p><p>Wings. Fore wing (Fig. 38a): pterostigma 3.9 × longer than wide; SR1: 3-SR: r = 5: 4: 1; 1-SR+M more or less straight; 2-SR: 3-SR: r-m = 7: 20: 9; angle between 1-SR and C+SC+R about 80°; cu-a postfurcal, nearly not oblique anteriorly. Hind wing (Fig. 38b): SC+R1: 2-SC+R: 1r-m = 17: 4: 21.</p><p>Legs. Length of fore femur: tibia: tarsus = 20: 24: 29; length of hind femur: tibia: basitarsus = 32: 55: 14; length of femur, tibia and basitarsus of hind leg 2.3, 6.9 and 3.5 × their maximum width, respectively; hind tibial spurs 0.3 and 0.5 × as long as hind basitarsus.</p><p>Metasoma. Length of first metasomal tergite 1.3 × its apical width, median area convex and with longitudinal striae, medio-longitudinal carina present, but not reaching posterior margin of first tergite, lateral grooves sparsely crenulate (Fig. 38j); second tergite largely longitudinally striate, but antero-lateral and posterior areas smooth (Fig. 38e); apical width of second tergite 1.1 × its median length, anterior grooves crenulate (Fig. 38e); second suture wide and deep, crenulate, nearly straight medially (Fig. 38e); third tergite with antero-lateral areas; third–fifth tergites without subposterior groove (Fig. 38e); third–seventh tergites smooth; fourth–seventh tergites densely setose laterally and posteriorly; ovipositor sheath 0.14 × as long as fore wing.</p><p>Colour. Head and mesosoma largely yellow (Fig. 37); antenna, mandible apically, frons medially (Fig. 38g), area surrounding stemmaticum and temple posteriorly black (Fig. 38h); metapleuron ventrally (Fig. 38c), middle lobe and lateral lobes of mesoscutum with a black spot (Fig. 38d); propodeum brown(Fig. 38d); fore and middle legs yellow, hind leg black (Fig. 38f); metasoma and ovipositor sheath black (Figs 37, 38e); wing membrane yellow, but dark brown apically, fore wing with irregular dark brown stigmal spot up to vein CU1b, and a dark brown spot around posterior half of vein 2-1A, including dark brown veins 1-SR, 1-SR+M, m-cu and 3-CU1 and apically wings with wide dark brown area; pterostigma and remainder of veins yellow (Figs 38a, 38b).</p><p>Variation. Length of body of female 13.1–15.8 mm, of fore wing of female 12.4–14.0 mm, and of ovipositor sheath 2.0–4.0 mm; antenna of female with 90 antennomeres; length of mesosoma 2.0 × its height; fore wing vein 1r-m 1.1 × as long as vein SC+R1; ovipositor sheath 0.14–0.32 × as long as fore wing; propodeum black; hind tibia and tarsus infuscate.</p><p>Biology. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Yunnan).</p><p>Etymology. Named after the relatively long vein 1r-m of the fore wing: “longus” and “nervis” is Latin for “long” and “sinew, vein”, respectively.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A186AFF9EFF7EE709FDD7FA8E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A1868FF9EFF7EE1DFFD70F878.text	EE15879A1868FF9EFF7EE1DFFD70F878.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Iphiaulax mactator (Klug 1817)	<div><p>Iphiaulax mactator (Klug, 1817)</p><p>Figs 39–40</p><p>Bracon mactator Klug (in Germar), 1817: 258.</p><p>Iphiaulax mactator (Klug): Szépligeti, 1904: 22, 1906: 583; Telenga, 1936: 110; Papp, 1960: 377; Tobias, 1971: 206; Shenefelt, 1978: 1777; Tobias &amp; Belokobylskij, 2000: 179; Wang et al., 2008: 188.</p><p>Iphiaulax commiferus Shestakov, 1927: 204 . Synonymized by Telenga, 1936: 110.</p><p>Material. CHINA— Hunan Province • 1♀; Bucheng Nanshanmuchang; 6 Aug. 1985; N.Z. Chen leg.; ZJUH 200012105 .— Nei Menggu Province • 1♀; Wulashan; 14 Jul. 1978; J.K. Yang leg.; ZJUH 200012243 .</p><p>Biology. Larval parasitoid of Acanthocinus aedilis (Linnaeus, 1758) ( Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) (Telenga 1936).</p><p>Distribution. China (Henan, Hunan, Nei Menggu); Azerbaijan; Bosnia Hercegovina; Croatia; former Czechoslovakia; Germany; Greece; Hungary; Iran; Italy; Kazakhstan; Mongolia; Poland; Romania; Russia; Slovakia; Spain; Syria; Ukraine; former Yugoslavia.</p><p>Note. This species new to Hunan (C. China); Wang et al. (2008) reported this species from Jilin, Nei Menggu and Henan, but the specimen of Jilin is misidentified .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A1868FF9EFF7EE1DFFD70F878	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A1869FF9FFF7EE0B1FE9BF9E6.text	EE15879A1869FF9FFF7EE0B1FE9BF9E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Iphiaulax malayanus Cameron 1901	<div><p>Iphiaulax malayanus Cameron, 1901</p><p>Iphiaulax malayanus Cameron, 1901: 43; Whitaker et al., 2007: 25.</p><p>Iphiaulax malajanus Cameron: Szépligeti, 1904: 23 [misspelling].</p><p>Hybogaster malayanus (Cameron): Baltazar, 1972: 268; Shenefelt, 1978: 1689.</p><p>Iphiaulax sadongensis Cameron, 1906: 105 . Synonymized by Whitaker et al., 2007: 25.</p><p>Biology. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Hainan); Indonesia; Laos; Malaysia; Philippines; Sri Lanka; Vietnam.</p><p>Note. Whitaker et al. (2007) reported this species from Hainan (S China), but no specimens were available for our study.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A1869FF9FFF7EE0B1FE9BF9E6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A1869FF9FFF7EE2F7FD5FF860.text	EE15879A1869FF9FFF7EE2F7FD5FF860.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Iphiaulax sauteri Enderlein 1920	<div><p>Iphiaulax sauteri Enderlein, 1920</p><p>Iphiaulax sauteri Enderlein, 1920: 128; Shenefelt, 1978: 1794.</p><p>Biology. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Taiwan).</p><p>Note. The type series was collected by H. Sauter in Taiwan, as reported by Enderlein (1920); what was repeated by Watanabe (1937). No specimens were available for our study; Wang et al. (2008) reported this species from Zhejiang, but this concerns a misidentified specimen.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A1869FF9FFF7EE2F7FD5FF860	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A1867FF91FF7EE4CAFE1AFD21.text	EE15879A1867FF91FF7EE4CAFE1AFD21.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Iphiaulax stramineus Cameron 1907	<div><p>Iphiaulax stramineus Cameron, 1907</p><p>Figs 41–42</p><p>Iphiaulax stramineus Cameron, 1907: 172; He et al., 2002: 883; Whitaker et al., 2007: 30; Wang et al., 2008: 189.</p><p>Iphiaulax trichionotus Strand, 1912: 59 . Synonymized by Dover, 1925: 40.</p><p>Material. CHINA— Yunnan Province • 1♀; Jinping Mengla; 400m; 24 Apr. 1956; K. R . Huang leg.; IZCAS IOZ (E)1964533 • 1♀; Xishuangbanna Xiaomengyang; 850m; 21 Aug. 1957; L.C. Zang leg.; IZCAS IOZ (E) 1964574 • 1♀; Xishuangbanna Xiaomengyang; 850m; 20 Oct. 1957; L.C. Zang leg.; IZCAS IOZ (E) 1964608 • 1♀; Xish-uangbanna Damenglong; 650m; 10 Apr. 1958; C.P. Hong leg.; IZCAS IOZ (E) 1964609.— Hainan Province • 1♀; Qiongzhong; 15 Jul. 1960; C.Q. Li leg.; IZCAS IOZ (E) 1964593.</p><p>Biology. Unkown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Hainan, Yunnan); India; Myanmar.</p><p>Note. This species is new for Yunnan (SW China); Hoffmann (1938) and He et al. (2002) reported this species already from Hainan.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A1867FF91FF7EE4CAFE1AFD21	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A1865FF93FF7EE4CAFDC5FE73.text	EE15879A1865FF93FF7EE4CAFDC5FE73.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Iphiaulax wuhainensis Wang & Chen 2008	<div><p>Iphiaulax wuhainensis Wang &amp; Chen, 2008</p><p>Figs 43–44</p><p>Iphiaulax wuhainensis Wang &amp; Chen in Wang et al., 2008: 189 .</p><p>Material. CHINA— Nei Menggu Province • 1♀; Wuhai desert; 21 Aug. 2000; Y. Ma leg.; ZJUH 200100473 (Holotype) .</p><p>Biology. Unkown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Nei Menggu).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A1865FF93FF7EE4CAFDC5FE73	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
EE15879A1863FF95FF7EE4CAFD8EFE78.text	EE15879A1863FF95FF7EE4CAFD8EFE78.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Iphiaulax zebripterae (Wang & Chen 2008)	<div><p>Iphiaulax zebripterae (Wang &amp; Chen, 2008)</p><p>Figs 45–46</p><p>Hybogaster zebripterae Wang &amp; Chen in Wang et al., 2008: 183 .</p><p>Iphiaulax zebripterae (Wang &amp; Chen): Li, van Achterberg &amp; Chen, 2017: 37.</p><p>Material. CHINA – Fujian Province • 1♀; Longhai; 12 Aug. 1960; G. T. Jin &amp; Y.M. Lin leg.; ZJUH (Holotype) .</p><p>Biology. Unkown.</p><p>Distribution. China (Fujian).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE15879A1863FF95FF7EE4CAFD8EFE78	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Li, Yang;Achterberg, Cornelis Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Li, Yang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2020): Two genera Campyloneurus Szépligeti and Iphiaulax Foerster in China, with the descriptions of fourteen new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Braconinae). Zootaxa 4884 (1): 1-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4884.1.1
