identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
8DBD5B4BD1B35C5DBDBE5A3005E514F5.text	8DBD5B4BD1B35C5DBDBE5A3005E514F5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hemerocallis liliastrum L.	<div><p>Hemerocallis liliastrum L., Sp. Pl. 1: 324. 1753.</p><p>≡ Anthericum liliastrum (L.) L., Sp. Pl. ed. 2, 1: 445. 1762. ≡ Anthericum grandiflorum Salisb., Prodr. Stirp. Chap. Allerton: 250. 1796., nom. illeg. (Art. 52.1 of the ICN; Turland et al. 2025) ≡ Scilla liliiformis F. Lestib., Botanogr. Belg.: 172. 1781., nom. illeg. (Art. 52.1 of the ICN) ≡ Phalangium liliastrum (L.) Desf., Tabl. École Bot.: 26. 1804 . [October 1804] ≡ Phalangium liliastrum (L.) Brot., Fl. Lusit. 1: 534. 1804. [October 1804], isonym ≡ Czackia liliastrum (L.) Andrz., Czachia: 1. 1818. ≡ Liliastrum album Link, Handbuch 1: 173. 1829 . ≡ Pleisolirion liliastrum (L.) Raf., Fl. Tellur. 2: 28. 1837. ≡ Paradisea liliastrum (L.) Bertol., Fl. Ital. 4: 133. 1840.</p><p>Lectotypus</p><p>(here designated): Herb. Linn., No. 432.9 (LINN!; Fig. 1 A).</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Linnaeus (1753: 324) made slight changes to his diagnosis (HEMEROCALLIS scapo simplici, corollis hexapetalis campanulatis) drawing from his own account in Hortus Cliffortianus (Linnaeus, 1738: 128) and from van Royen’s (1740: 27) Florae Leydensis Prodromus where the polynomial Hemerocallis radice tuberosa, corollis hexapetalis is recorded. He also refers to Haller (1742: 290), however, in this source the polynomial cannot be found, and only a reference to the epithet “ liliastrum ” appears. Then, he added other synonyms from Bauhin (1623: 29, “ Phalangium magno flore ”), Clusius (1605, “ Phalangium allobrogicum majus ”), and Dalechamps (1586, “ Phalangium ”). The species is cited as occurring “ in Alpibus Helveticis, Allobrogicis ”.</p><p>In the Linnean herbarium at LINN, there is one specimen that can be considered original material, bearing the original annotation “ 2 Liliastrum ” (No. 432.9, numbering follows Savage 1945; Fig. 1 A). In the Clifford Herbarium there is a specimen (sheet No. BM 000558542, BM) identifiable as this species, but it is not associated with the relevant entry there and therefore cannot be considered original material.</p><p>Adriaan van Royen’s Herbarium is conserved at L and it was studied by Linnaeus. In the van Royen Herbarium there are two herbarium specimens at L (the better preserved Sheet No. L 0052789, 913.18-70 - Fig. 1 B, and the Sheet No. L 0052788, 913.18-68) which can be considered as original material.</p><p>Bauhin’s polynomials are associated with original material studied by Linnaeus in the Burser Herbarium at UPS; however, no entry for “ Phalangium magno flore ” is preserved in this herbarium. Finally, there are accurate illustrations in Dalechamps (1586: 852, “ Phalangium Dalechamps ”; Fig. 1 C) and in Clusius (1605, “ Phalangium allobrogicum majus ”; Fig. 1 D) which also constitute original material.</p><p>Among the five traced original materials, we here designate the complete and better-preserved specimen in the Linnean Herbarium as the lectotype of Hemerocallis liliastrum . The lectotype, along with the remaining original material, corresponds to the current concept of this species (e. g., Romero 2013; Tison and de Foucault 2014; Pignatti 2017).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8DBD5B4BD1B35C5DBDBE5A3005E514F5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Peruzzi, Lorenzo	Peruzzi, Lorenzo (2025): Typification of the Linnaean name Hemerocallis liliastrum. Italian Botanist 20: 41-44, DOI: 10.3897/italianbotanist.20.170416
