taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713789/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713789	FIGURE 1. Eriocheir sinensis zoeal stages, CLSM images. (A) ZI, 10× dry objective, (B) ZII, 10× dry objective applying ‘large images’ option with a scanned area of 2×1 fields for image stitching, (C) ZIII, 10× dry objective applying ‘large images’ option with a scanned area of 2×2 fields for image stitching, (D) ZIV, 10×dry objective applying ‘large images’ option with a scanned area of 3×2 fields for image stitching, (E) ZV, 10×dry objective applying ‘large images’ option with a scanned area of 4×3 fields for image stitching, (F) ZVI, 10× dry objective applying ‘large images’ option with a scanned area of 4×4 fields for image stitching. Scale bars = 500 µm.	FIGURE 1. Eriocheir sinensis zoeal stages, CLSM images. (A) ZI, 10× dry objective, (B) ZII, 10× dry objective applying ‘large images’ option with a scanned area of 2×1 fields for image stitching, (C) ZIII, 10× dry objective applying ‘large images’ option with a scanned area of 2×2 fields for image stitching, (D) ZIV, 10×dry objective applying ‘large images’ option with a scanned area of 3×2 fields for image stitching, (E) ZV, 10×dry objective applying ‘large images’ option with a scanned area of 4×3 fields for image stitching, (F) ZVI, 10× dry objective applying ‘large images’ option with a scanned area of 4×4 fields for image stitching. Scale bars = 500 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713791/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713791	FIGURE 2. Eriocheir sinensis, ZI, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) frontal view of carapace with one pair of posterodorsal setae arrowed, (B) spinulated lateral carapace spine (arrowed) and ventral carapace margin, (C) dorsoposterior view of carapace margin without setae, (D) dorsal spine with spinulation. Objective: A, C, D = 20× dry; B = 40× oil immersion. Scale bars A, C, D = 200 µm; B = 100 µm.	FIGURE 2. Eriocheir sinensis, ZI, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) frontal view of carapace with one pair of posterodorsal setae arrowed, (B) spinulated lateral carapace spine (arrowed) and ventral carapace margin, (C) dorsoposterior view of carapace margin without setae, (D) dorsal spine with spinulation. Objective: A, C, D = 20× dry; B = 40× oil immersion. Scale bars A, C, D = 200 µm; B = 100 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713793/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713793	FIGURE 3. Eriocheir sinensis, ZI, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) antennule, 4 terminal aesthetascs (2 broad, 2 slender) and 1 small seta, (B) antenna, with two exopodal setae. Objective: = 60× oil immersion. Scale bars = 50 µm.	FIGURE 3. Eriocheir sinensis, ZI, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) antennule, 4 terminal aesthetascs (2 broad, 2 slender) and 1 small seta, (B) antenna, with two exopodal setae. Objective: = 60× oil immersion. Scale bars = 50 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713795/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713795	FIGURE 4. Eriocheir sinensis, ZI, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) mandible with incisor teeth arrowed, (B) lateral view of mandible showing incisor teeth, (C) maxillule. Objectives: = 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 50 µm.	FIGURE 4. Eriocheir sinensis, ZI, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) mandible with incisor teeth arrowed, (B) lateral view of mandible showing incisor teeth, (C) maxillule. Objectives: = 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 50 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713797/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713797	FIGURE 5. Eriocheir sinensis, ZI, maxilla, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) maxilla, (B) coxal endite, (C) basial endite, (D) endopod. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 50 µm.	FIGURE 5. Eriocheir sinensis, ZI, maxilla, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) maxilla, (B) coxal endite, (C) basial endite, (D) endopod. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 50 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713799/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713799	FIGURE 6. Eriocheir sinensis, ZI, first maxilliped, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) whole appendage, (B) coxa and basis, (C) coxa and basis rotated to reveal reverse angle of image A, (D) endopod, (E) exopod with 4 natatory setae. Objective: B-D = 40× oil immersion; A, E = 20× dry. Scale bars A, B, D = 100 µm; C, E = 200 µm.	FIGURE 6. Eriocheir sinensis, ZI, first maxilliped, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) whole appendage, (B) coxa and basis, (C) coxa and basis rotated to reveal reverse angle of image A, (D) endopod, (E) exopod with 4 natatory setae. Objective: B-D = 40× oil immersion; A, E = 20× dry. Scale bars A, B, D = 100 µm; C, E = 200 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713801/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713801	FIGURE 7. Eriocheir sinensis, ZI, second maxilliped, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) whole appendage, (B) coxa, basis and endopod, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (C) distal endopod article. Objective: A = 20× dry; B = 40× oil immersion; C = 60× oil immersion. Scale bars A-B = 100 µm; C = 50 µm.	FIGURE 7. Eriocheir sinensis, ZI, second maxilliped, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) whole appendage, (B) coxa, basis and endopod, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (C) distal endopod article. Objective: A = 20× dry; B = 40× oil immersion; C = 60× oil immersion. Scale bars A-B = 100 µm; C = 50 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713803/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713803	FIGURE 8. Eriocheir sinensis, ZI, pleon, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) dorsal view, one pair of posterodorsal setae on pleomere 3 presented in detail (arrowed), applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×6 fields for image stitching, (B) lateral view, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching. Objective: A = 40× oil immersion; B = 20× dry. Scale bars = 200 µm.	FIGURE 8. Eriocheir sinensis, ZI, pleon, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) dorsal view, one pair of posterodorsal setae on pleomere 3 presented in detail (arrowed), applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×6 fields for image stitching, (B) lateral view, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching. Objective: A = 40× oil immersion; B = 20× dry. Scale bars = 200 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713805/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713805	FIGURE 9. Eriocheir sinensis, ZI, telson, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) dorsal view of telson showing posterior margin with 3 pairs of stout spinulate spines, (B) ventral view of telson showing anal operculum; both applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×2 fields for image stitching. Nikon CLSM images, (C) telson fork, (D) double row of denticules on inner margin of fork. Objective: A-B = 40× oil immersion; C = 60× oil immersion. Scale bars A-B = 100 µm; C = 50 µm.	FIGURE 9. Eriocheir sinensis, ZI, telson, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) dorsal view of telson showing posterior margin with 3 pairs of stout spinulate spines, (B) ventral view of telson showing anal operculum; both applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×2 fields for image stitching. Nikon CLSM images, (C) telson fork, (D) double row of denticules on inner margin of fork. Objective: A-B = 40× oil immersion; C = 60× oil immersion. Scale bars A-B = 100 µm; C = 50 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713807/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713807	FIGURE 10. Eriocheir sinensis, ZII, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) ventral carapace margin, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×1 fields for image stitching, (B) lateral spine now without spinulation, (C) inner side of (A). Objective: A, C = 40× oil immersion; B = 20 dry. Scale bars = 100 µm.	FIGURE 10. Eriocheir sinensis, ZII, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) ventral carapace margin, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×1 fields for image stitching, (B) lateral spine now without spinulation, (C) inner side of (A). Objective: A, C = 40× oil immersion; B = 20 dry. Scale bars = 100 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713809/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713809	FIGURE 11. Eriocheir sinensis, ZII, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) antennule, image merged using Adobe Photoshop, (B) antenna with two exopodal setae, (C) maxillule. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars A–B = 50 µm; C = 100 µm.	FIGURE 11. Eriocheir sinensis, ZII, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) antennule, image merged using Adobe Photoshop, (B) antenna with two exopodal setae, (C) maxillule. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars A–B = 50 µm; C = 100 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713811/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713811	FIGURE 12. Eriocheir sinensis, ZII, maxilla, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) maxilla, image merged using Adobe Photoshop, (B) maxilla rotated to reveal reverse angle of image A and the setation of the coxal and basial endites. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 100 µm.	FIGURE 12. Eriocheir sinensis, ZII, maxilla, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) maxilla, image merged using Adobe Photoshop, (B) maxilla rotated to reveal reverse angle of image A and the setation of the coxal and basial endites. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 100 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713813/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713813	FIGURE 13. Eriocheir sinensis, ZII, first maxilliped, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) whole appendage, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (B) endopod, (C) basis, (D) exopod with 6 natatory setae, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching. Objective: A, D = 20× dry; B-C = 40× oil immersion. Scale bars A, D = 200 µm; B-C = 100 µm.	FIGURE 13. Eriocheir sinensis, ZII, first maxilliped, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) whole appendage, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (B) endopod, (C) basis, (D) exopod with 6 natatory setae, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching. Objective: A, D = 20× dry; B-C = 40× oil immersion. Scale bars A, D = 200 µm; B-C = 100 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713815/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713815	FIGURE 14. Eriocheir sinensis, ZII, second maxilliped, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) whole appendage, 20× dry objective, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (B) basis, (C) endopod. Objective: A = 20× dry; B-C = 40× oil immersion. Scale bars A = 200 µm; B-C = 100 µm.	FIGURE 14. Eriocheir sinensis, ZII, second maxilliped, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) whole appendage, 20× dry objective, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (B) basis, (C) endopod. Objective: A = 20× dry; B-C = 40× oil immersion. Scale bars A = 200 µm; B-C = 100 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713817/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713817	FIGURE 15. Eriocheir sinensis, ZII, pleon and telson, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) dorsal view of pleon, image merged using Adobe Photoshop, (B) lateral view of pleon and telson, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (C) pleomere 1 with a small dorsal medial seta, (D) dorsal view of telson. Objective: A, C = 40× oil immersion; B, D = 20× dry. Scale bars = 200 µm.	FIGURE 15. Eriocheir sinensis, ZII, pleon and telson, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) dorsal view of pleon, image merged using Adobe Photoshop, (B) lateral view of pleon and telson, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (C) pleomere 1 with a small dorsal medial seta, (D) dorsal view of telson. Objective: A, C = 40× oil immersion; B, D = 20× dry. Scale bars = 200 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713819/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713819	FIGURE 16. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIII, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) anterior view of carapace, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×3 fields for image stitching, (B) ventral carapace margin, (C) dorsal spine with 1 pair of setae, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars = 200 µm.	FIGURE 16. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIII, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) anterior view of carapace, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×3 fields for image stitching, (B) ventral carapace margin, (C) dorsal spine with 1 pair of setae, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars = 200 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713821/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713821	FIGURE 17. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIII, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) antennule, (B) antenna with endopod bud, (C) antenna rotated to reveal reverse angle of image B to show developing endopod bud and two exopodal setae arrowed. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 100 µm.	FIGURE 17. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIII, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) antennule, (B) antenna with endopod bud, (C) antenna rotated to reveal reverse angle of image B to show developing endopod bud and two exopodal setae arrowed. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 100 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713823/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713823	FIGURE 18. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIII, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) mandible, (B) maxillule, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 100 µm.	FIGURE 18. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIII, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) mandible, (B) maxillule, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 100 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713825/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713825	FIGURE 19. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIII, maxilla, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) whole appendage, image merged using VGStudio MAX, (B) maxilla rotated to reveal reverse angle of image A and the setation of the coxal and basial endites. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 100 µm.	FIGURE 19. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIII, maxilla, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) whole appendage, image merged using VGStudio MAX, (B) maxilla rotated to reveal reverse angle of image A and the setation of the coxal and basial endites. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 100 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713827/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713827	FIGURE 20. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIII, first maxilliped, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) coxa and basis, image merged using VGStudio MAX, (B) exopod with 8 natatory setae, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (C) endopod, image merged using VGStudio MAX. Objective: A, C = 40× oil immersion; B = 20× dry. Scale bars A, C = 100 µm; B = 200 µm.	FIGURE 20. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIII, first maxilliped, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) coxa and basis, image merged using VGStudio MAX, (B) exopod with 8 natatory setae, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (C) endopod, image merged using VGStudio MAX. Objective: A, C = 40× oil immersion; B = 20× dry. Scale bars A, C = 100 µm; B = 200 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713829/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713829	FIGURE 21. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIII, second maxilliped, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) whole appendage, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (B) endopod, (C) basis, (D) basis rotated to reveal reverse angle of image C; both images merged using VGStudio MAX. Objective: A = 20× dry; B = 60× oil immersion; C-D = 40× oil immersion. Scale bars A = 200 µm; B-D = 100 µm.	FIGURE 21. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIII, second maxilliped, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) whole appendage, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (B) endopod, (C) basis, (D) basis rotated to reveal reverse angle of image C; both images merged using VGStudio MAX. Objective: A = 20× dry; B = 60× oil immersion; C-D = 40× oil immersion. Scale bars A = 200 µm; B-D = 100 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713831/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713831	FIGURE 22. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIII, pleon and telson, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) dorsal view of pleon and telson, image merged using Adobe Photoshop, (B) lateral view of pleon, (C) pleomere 1 with a dorsal medial seta, (D) dorsal view of telson. Objective: A, D = 20× dry; B = 10× dry; C = 40× oil immersion. Scale bars A, B, D = 200 µm; C = 100 µm.	FIGURE 22. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIII, pleon and telson, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) dorsal view of pleon and telson, image merged using Adobe Photoshop, (B) lateral view of pleon, (C) pleomere 1 with a dorsal medial seta, (D) dorsal view of telson. Objective: A, D = 20× dry; B = 10× dry; C = 40× oil immersion. Scale bars A, B, D = 200 µm; C = 100 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713833/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713833	FIGURE 23. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIV, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) anterior view of carapace, (B) dorsal spine with 2 pairs of setae, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×3 fields for image stitching. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars = 200 µm.	FIGURE 23. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIV, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) anterior view of carapace, (B) dorsal spine with 2 pairs of setae, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×3 fields for image stitching. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars = 200 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713835/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713835	FIGURE 24. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIV, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) a general view of ventral carapace margin with lateral spine, (B) smooth lateral spine, (C) ventral carapace margin, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (D) inner side of ventral carapace margin in detail. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars A, C = 200 µm; B, D = 100 µm.	FIGURE 24. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIV, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) a general view of ventral carapace margin with lateral spine, (B) smooth lateral spine, (C) ventral carapace margin, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (D) inner side of ventral carapace margin in detail. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars A, C = 200 µm; B, D = 100 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713837/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713837	FIGURE 25. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIV, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) antennule, (B) antenna with a more developed endopod and two exopodal setae arrowed; both applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×3 fields for image stitching. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars A = 100 µm; B = 200 µm.	FIGURE 25. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIV, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) antennule, (B) antenna with a more developed endopod and two exopodal setae arrowed; both applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×3 fields for image stitching. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars A = 100 µm; B = 200 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713839/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713839	FIGURE 26. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIV, mandible, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) mandibles, (B) lateral view of mandible showing incisor teeth and molar region, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching. Objective: A = 20× dry; B = 40× oil immersion. Scale bars A = 200 µm; B = 100 µm.	FIGURE 26. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIV, mandible, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) mandibles, (B) lateral view of mandible showing incisor teeth and molar region, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching. Objective: A = 20× dry; B = 40× oil immersion. Scale bars A = 200 µm; B = 100 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713841/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713841	FIGURE 27. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIV, maxillule, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) maxillule, image merged using Adobe Photoshop, (B) maxillule rotated to reveal reverse angle of image A and the setation of the coxal and basial endites. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 200 µm.	FIGURE 27. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIV, maxillule, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) maxillule, image merged using Adobe Photoshop, (B) maxillule rotated to reveal reverse angle of image A and the setation of the coxal and basial endites. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 200 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713843/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713843	FIGURE 28. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIV, maxilla, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) whole appendage, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×3 fields for image stitching, (B) maxilla rotated to show reverse angle of image A and the setation of the coxal and basial endites. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 200 µm.	FIGURE 28. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIV, maxilla, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) whole appendage, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×3 fields for image stitching, (B) maxilla rotated to show reverse angle of image A and the setation of the coxal and basial endites. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 200 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713845/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713845	FIGURE 29. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIV, first maxilliped, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) whole appendage, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×2 fields for image stitching, (B) endopod with 2,2,2,6 setae, (C) endopod with 2,3,2,2,6 setae, (D) exopod with 10 natatory setae. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars A, D = 500 µm; B-C = 200 µm.	FIGURE 29. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIV, first maxilliped, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) whole appendage, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×2 fields for image stitching, (B) endopod with 2,2,2,6 setae, (C) endopod with 2,3,2,2,6 setae, (D) exopod with 10 natatory setae. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars A, D = 500 µm; B-C = 200 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713847/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713847	FIGURE 30. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIV, second maxilliped, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) basis and endopod, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (B) endopod, (C) exopod with 10 natatory setae, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars A, C = 500 µm; B = 100 µm.	FIGURE 30. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIV, second maxilliped, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) basis and endopod, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (B) endopod, (C) exopod with 10 natatory setae, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars A, C = 500 µm; B = 100 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713849/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713849	FIGURE 31. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIV, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) third maxilliped, (B) pereiopods with bilobed chela. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 100 µm.	FIGURE 31. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIV, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) third maxilliped, (B) pereiopods with bilobed chela. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 100 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713851/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713851	FIGURE 32. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIV, pleon and telson, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) dorsal view of pleon and telson, (B) lateral view of pleon and telson; both applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (C) pleomere 1 with 5 medial setae, (D) pleomere 1 with 2 medial setae, (E) dorsal view of telson. Objective: A-B = 10× dry; C-E =20× dry. Scale bars = 500 µm.	FIGURE 32. Eriocheir sinensis, ZIV, pleon and telson, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) dorsal view of pleon and telson, (B) lateral view of pleon and telson; both applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (C) pleomere 1 with 5 medial setae, (D) pleomere 1 with 2 medial setae, (E) dorsal view of telson. Objective: A-B = 10× dry; C-E =20× dry. Scale bars = 500 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713853/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713853	FIGURE 33. Eriocheir sinensis, ZV, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) anterior view of carapace, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×2 fields for image stitching, (B) dorsal spine with 3 pairs of setae, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×3 fields for image stitching. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars = 500 µm.	FIGURE 33. Eriocheir sinensis, ZV, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) anterior view of carapace, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×2 fields for image stitching, (B) dorsal spine with 3 pairs of setae, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×3 fields for image stitching. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars = 500 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713855/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713855	FIGURE 34. Eriocheir sinensis, ZV, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) general view of ventral carapace margin, (B) lateral spine proportionally shorter in length, (C) a detailed view of ventral carapace margin, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (D) inner side of ventral carapace margin. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars A, C, D = 500 µm; B = 100 µm.	FIGURE 34. Eriocheir sinensis, ZV, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) general view of ventral carapace margin, (B) lateral spine proportionally shorter in length, (C) a detailed view of ventral carapace margin, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (D) inner side of ventral carapace margin. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars A, C, D = 500 µm; B = 100 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713857/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713857	FIGURE 35. Eriocheir sinensis, ZV, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) antennule with a pair of proximal setae and a developing accessory flagellum bud, (B) antennule, primary flagellum showing two rows of subterminal aesthetascs, (C) antenna with a more developed endopod and with one exopodal seta arrowed; all applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×3 fields for image stitching, (D) exopod of antenna with two setae. Objective: A-C = 40×; D = 60× oil immersion. Scale bars A, C = 200 µm; B = 100 µm; D = 10 µm.	FIGURE 35. Eriocheir sinensis, ZV, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) antennule with a pair of proximal setae and a developing accessory flagellum bud, (B) antennule, primary flagellum showing two rows of subterminal aesthetascs, (C) antenna with a more developed endopod and with one exopodal seta arrowed; all applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×3 fields for image stitching, (D) exopod of antenna with two setae. Objective: A-C = 40×; D = 60× oil immersion. Scale bars A, C = 200 µm; B = 100 µm; D = 10 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713859/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713859	FIGURE 36. Eriocheir sinensis, ZV, mandible, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) mandible with palp bud present, (B) lateral view of mandible with incisor teeth and molar region; both applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars A = 200 µm; B = 100 µm.	FIGURE 36. Eriocheir sinensis, ZV, mandible, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) mandible with palp bud present, (B) lateral view of mandible with incisor teeth and molar region; both applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars A = 200 µm; B = 100 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713861/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713861	FIGURE 37. Eriocheir sinensis, ZV, maxillule, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) maxillule, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×3 fields for image stitching, (B) coxal endite, (C) basial endite. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 200 µm.	FIGURE 37. Eriocheir sinensis, ZV, maxillule, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) maxillule, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×3 fields for image stitching, (B) coxal endite, (C) basial endite. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 200 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713863/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713863	FIGURE 38. Eriocheir sinensis, ZV, maxilla, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) whole appendage, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 3×3 fields for image stitching, (B) coxal endite, (C) basial endite. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars A = 200 µm; B-C = 100 µm.	FIGURE 38. Eriocheir sinensis, ZV, maxilla, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) whole appendage, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 3×3 fields for image stitching, (B) coxal endite, (C) basial endite. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars A = 200 µm; B-C = 100 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713865/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713865	FIGURE 39. Eriocheir sinensis, ZV, first maxilliped, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) coxa with 3 setae and basis with 10 setae, (B) coxa with 3 setae and 1 smaller seta, basis with 12 setae, (C) endopod with 1,3,2,2,6 setae, (D) endopod with 2,3,2,2,6 setae, (E) exopod with 12 natatory setae, (F) exopod with 13 natatory setae; all applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars = 500 µm.	FIGURE 39. Eriocheir sinensis, ZV, first maxilliped, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) coxa with 3 setae and basis with 10 setae, (B) coxa with 3 setae and 1 smaller seta, basis with 12 setae, (C) endopod with 1,3,2,2,6 setae, (D) endopod with 2,3,2,2,6 setae, (E) exopod with 12 natatory setae, (F) exopod with 13 natatory setae; all applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars = 500 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713867/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713867	FIGURE 40. Eriocheir sinensis, ZV, second maxilliped, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) basis and endopod, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching (reverse angle of endopod arrowed), (B) endopod with 0,1,7 setae, (C) exopod with 12 natatory setae, (D) exopod with 13 natatory setae. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars A, C, D = 500 µm; B = 200 µm.	FIGURE 40. Eriocheir sinensis, ZV, second maxilliped, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) basis and endopod, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching (reverse angle of endopod arrowed), (B) endopod with 0,1,7 setae, (C) exopod with 12 natatory setae, (D) exopod with 13 natatory setae. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars A, C, D = 500 µm; B = 200 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713869/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713869	FIGURE 41. Eriocheir sinensis, ZV, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) third maxilliped, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (B) pereiopods with bilobed chela, (C) ventral view of fifth pleopods with endopods and uropods without endopods; both applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×2 fields for image stitching. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars A = 100 µm; B-C = 500 µm.	FIGURE 41. Eriocheir sinensis, ZV, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) third maxilliped, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (B) pereiopods with bilobed chela, (C) ventral view of fifth pleopods with endopods and uropods without endopods; both applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×2 fields for image stitching. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars A = 100 µm; B-C = 500 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713871/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713871	FIGURE 42. Eriocheir sinensis, ZV, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) dorsal view of pleon and telson, (B) lateral view of pleon and telson; both applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×3 fields for image stitching, (C) pleomere 1 with 7 medial setae, (D) dorsal view of telson showing a pair of medial setae. Objective: A-B = 10× dry; C-E =20× dry. Scale bars = 500 µm.	FIGURE 42. Eriocheir sinensis, ZV, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) dorsal view of pleon and telson, (B) lateral view of pleon and telson; both applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×3 fields for image stitching, (C) pleomere 1 with 7 medial setae, (D) dorsal view of telson showing a pair of medial setae. Objective: A-B = 10× dry; C-E =20× dry. Scale bars = 500 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713873/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713873	FIGURE 43. Eriocheir sinensis, ZVI, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) general view of ventral carapace margin with a much shorter lateral spine, (B) ventral carapace margin detailed, (C) dorsal spine with 4 pairs of setae; all applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×3 fields for image stitching. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars = 500 µm.	FIGURE 43. Eriocheir sinensis, ZVI, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) general view of ventral carapace margin with a much shorter lateral spine, (B) ventral carapace margin detailed, (C) dorsal spine with 4 pairs of setae; all applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×3 fields for image stitching. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars = 500 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713875/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713875	FIGURE 44. Eriocheir sinensis, ZVI, antennule, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) antennule showing small proximal seta, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (B) antennule rotated to show reverse angle of image A and the developing accessory flagellum bud, image merged using Adobe Photoshop. Objective: A = 20× dry; B = 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 200 µm.	FIGURE 44. Eriocheir sinensis, ZVI, antennule, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) antennule showing small proximal seta, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (B) antennule rotated to show reverse angle of image A and the developing accessory flagellum bud, image merged using Adobe Photoshop. Objective: A = 20× dry; B = 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 200 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713877/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713877	FIGURE 45. Eriocheir sinensis, ZVI, antenna, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) antenna with apparent 2-articled endopod distal tip almost equal to length of protopod, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (B) antenna with endopod slightly shorter than length of protopod, image merged using Adobe Photoshop. Objective: A = 20× dry; B = 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 200 µm.	FIGURE 45. Eriocheir sinensis, ZVI, antenna, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) antenna with apparent 2-articled endopod distal tip almost equal to length of protopod, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (B) antenna with endopod slightly shorter than length of protopod, image merged using Adobe Photoshop. Objective: A = 20× dry; B = 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 200 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713879/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713879	FIGURE 46. Eriocheir sinensis, ZVI, mandible, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) mandible with developing palp, (B) lateral view of mandible with incisor teeth and molar region; both applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars A = 200 µm; B = 100 µm.	FIGURE 46. Eriocheir sinensis, ZVI, mandible, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) mandible with developing palp, (B) lateral view of mandible with incisor teeth and molar region; both applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars A = 200 µm; B = 100 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713881/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713881	FIGURE 47. Eriocheir sinensis, ZV, maxillule, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) maxillule, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×3 fields for image stitching, (B) maxillule rotated to show from reverse angle of image A and the setation of the coxal and basial endites. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 500 µm.	FIGURE 47. Eriocheir sinensis, ZV, maxillule, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) maxillule, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×3 fields for image stitching, (B) maxillule rotated to show from reverse angle of image A and the setation of the coxal and basial endites. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 500 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713883/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713883	FIGURE 48. Eriocheir sinensis, ZVI, maxilla, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) whole appendage, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 3×3 fields for image stitching, 1 seta on exopod circled and arrowed, (B) maxilla rotated to show from reverse angle of image A and the setation of the coxal and basial endites. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 200 µm.	FIGURE 48. Eriocheir sinensis, ZVI, maxilla, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) whole appendage, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 3×3 fields for image stitching, 1 seta on exopod circled and arrowed, (B) maxilla rotated to show from reverse angle of image A and the setation of the coxal and basial endites. Objective: 40× oil immersion. Scale bars = 200 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713885/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713885	FIGURE 49. Eriocheir sinensis, ZVI, first maxilliped, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) coxa with 4+1 setae and basis with 12 setae, (B) endopod, (C) exopod with 14 natatory setae; all applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars = 500 µm.	FIGURE 49. Eriocheir sinensis, ZVI, first maxilliped, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) coxa with 4+1 setae and basis with 12 setae, (B) endopod, (C) exopod with 14 natatory setae; all applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars = 500 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713889/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713889	FIGURE 51. Eriocheir sinensis, ZVI, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) maxilliped three, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (B) pereiopods with bilobed chela, (C) ventral view of developing fifth pleopods with endopods and uropods without endopods; both applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×2 fields for image stitching. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars A = 200 µm; B-C = 500 µm.	FIGURE 51. Eriocheir sinensis, ZVI, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) maxilliped three, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (B) pereiopods with bilobed chela, (C) ventral view of developing fifth pleopods with endopods and uropods without endopods; both applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×2 fields for image stitching. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars A = 200 µm; B-C = 500 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713891/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713891	FIGURE 52. Eriocheir sinensis, ZVI, pleon and telson, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) dorsal view of pleon and telson, (B) lateral view of pleon and telson; both applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×3 fields for image stitching, (C) pleomere 1 with 7 medial setae, (D) dorsal view of telson with 6 pairs of setae, (E) telson with a pair of medial setae. Objective: A-B = 10× dry; C-D =20× dry; E = 40× oil immersion. Scale bars A-D = 500 µm; E = 100 µm.	FIGURE 52. Eriocheir sinensis, ZVI, pleon and telson, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) dorsal view of pleon and telson, (B) lateral view of pleon and telson; both applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 2×3 fields for image stitching, (C) pleomere 1 with 7 medial setae, (D) dorsal view of telson with 6 pairs of setae, (E) telson with a pair of medial setae. Objective: A-B = 10× dry; C-D =20× dry; E = 40× oil immersion. Scale bars A-D = 500 µm; E = 100 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
D3278796277E693BFF75C650FBC69F8B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3713887/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3713887	FIGURE 50. Eriocheir sinensis, ZVI, second maxilliped, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) coxa, basis and endopod, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (B) endopod with 0,1,7 setae, (C) exopod with 13 natatory setae. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars A, C = 500 µm; B = 100 µm.	FIGURE 50. Eriocheir sinensis, ZVI, second maxilliped, CLSM images with Drishti processing. (A) coxa, basis and endopod, applying “large images” option with a scanned area of 1×2 fields for image stitching, (B) endopod with 0,1,7 setae, (C) exopod with 13 natatory setae. Objective: 20× dry. Scale bars A, C = 500 µm; B = 100 µm.	2018-10-29	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.		Zenodo	biologists	Kamanli, Seyit A.;Morritt, David;Ball, Alexander D.;Goral, Tomasz;Clark, Paul F.			
