identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
C96E87A3FFD2B957FDE4EECCFBB80AE2.text	C96E87A3FFD2B957FDE4EECCFBB80AE2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Anyllis Kirkaldy 1906	<div><p>Genus Anyllis Kirkaldy</p> <p>Anyllis Kirkaldy, 1906: 386; Lallemand, 1912: 74, 83; Metcalf, 1961: 63; Evans, 1966: 316, 317; Liang and Fletcher, 2003: 86; Liang et al., 2005: 301, 302. Type species: Anyllis leiala Kirkaldy 1906, by monotypy.</p> <p>Neoaphrophora China, 1952: 789; Metcalf, 1962: 431; Evans, 1966: 316, 317. Type species: Neoaphrophora tiegsi China 1952, by original designation. [Synonymized by Liang and Fletcher, 2003: 86.]</p> <p>Description</p> <p>Small-sized aphrophorine species, body length (from apex of vertex to tip of forewings): male 4.5–6.9 mm, female, 4.8–9.0 mm.</p> <p>General colour brown to dark brown (reddish brown in gibbosus sp. nov.). Vertex, pronotum and clavus of forewings usually much paler, giving pale stramineous appearance; dorsum covered with fuscous punctures. Frons, thorax beneath and coxae and femora of legs sometimes suffused with dark brown or fuscous. Forewings dark brown to blackish, usually marked with whitish fasciae and spots, the extreme basal costal area, an oblique fascia running from middle costa to apex of scutellum, the subapical costal and subcostal area and an oblique fascia running from the basal inner edge of the marking on the subapical costal and subcostal area to the claval apex, the apex of clavus and the area beyond apex of clavus, and the subapical corial area usually whitish; the fascia sometimes greatly reduced and whitish-spotted (Figure 1).</p> <p>Body with dorsum distinctly punctate. Head (Figures 1 (A–L), 2A, 3A, 4A, 5A) relatively short and broad, shorter than pronotum, distinctly wider between eyes than long in middle, slightly narrower than pronotum at shoulders. Vertex (Figures 1A,C,E,G,I,K, 2A, 3A, 4A, 5A) somewhat triangular in shape, sloping anteriorly, flat to undulate dorsally, usually with a median longitudinal carina (nearly obsolete in A. pseudotiegsi sp. nov.) and a small callous fovea on posterior marginal area between ocellus and eye, anterior margin clearly defined and carinate. Eyes distinctly longer than wide in dorsal view. Tylus (Figures 1 (A–L), 2A, 3A, 4A, 5A) short and transversely long, about three times as broad as median length, with posterior margin arched anteriorly in middle. Ocelli very close to each other. Frons (Figures 1B,D,F,H,J,L, 2B, 3B, 4B, 5B) strongly compressed and depressed laterally, narrow and keel-like medially or moderately bulbous in males, and usually swollen, not strongly compressed laterally in females. Antennae with flagellar base expanded and visible, bearing an apical, broadly conical process being next and parallel to the flagellar bristle and nine small coeloconic sensilla on ventral side (see Liang et al., 2005). Rostrum relatively long, nearly reaching hind coxae.</p> <p>Pronotum (Figures 1A,C,E,G,I,K, 2A, 3A, 4A, 5A) usually with a median longitudinal carina (nearly obsolete in A. pseudotiegsi sp. nov.), anterior margin evenly convexly rounded or slightly angulate in middle, anterior half distinctly callous centrally, posterior half transversely rugose; anterior lateral margin relatively long, shorter than longitudinal axis of eyes. Scutellum nearly triangular, centrally slightly depressed and transversely rugose. Forewings (Figure 1A–L) narrow, with very sparse pubescence, costal margin evenly convex from base to apex, venation reticulate apically. Hindwings translucent, veins brown. Hind tibia with one strong spur on lateral edge at distal two-fifths and 13–16 black-tipped spines apically, metatarsomeres I and II with 5–8 and 6–11 black-tipped spines apically, respectively.</p> <p>Male genitalia with pygofer (Figures 2C, 3C, 4C, 5C) in lateral view relatively short, distinctly high (compared with typical Aphrophora species) and nearly subquadrate, slightly wider ventrally than dorsally. Anal segments (Figures 2C,E, 3C,E, 4C,E, 5C,E) relatively short and small, basal anal segment with a pair of posteriorly directed, spinous processes on ventral margin, the inner edge of those spinous processes usually covered with fine spines. Subgenital plates (Figures 2C,D, 3C,D, 4C,D, 5C,D) reduced, short and small (compared with typical Aphrophora species), completely fused to pygofer, apically slightly bilobed or sometimes parabolalike in ventral view, right and left plates separated each other, forming a V-shaped empty space and making the base of aedeagus visible in ventral view. Genital styles (Figures (2–5)C, (2–5)D, (2–5)F, (2–5)G) relatively elongate and slender, sinuate in lateral view; mesially expanded outwards, narrowed to apex over distal half, apex bidentate; arched inward over distal half with extreme apex nearly touching each other in ventral view. Aedeagal shaft (Figures 2C,G, 3C,G, 4C,G, 5C,G) short, tubular, anteriorly arched in lateral view, anterior edge of the shaft covered with very fine spines, gonopore apical.</p> <p>Biology</p> <p>Biological data for the species Anyllis is scarce. Anyllis leiala is one of the most common and widespread aphrophorids found in Australia. It is commonly attracted to mercury-vapour lights and is frequently swept from a wide range of native, shrubby, dicotyledonous plants (Fletcher 2010; Liang and Fletcher 2003; Liang et al. 2005). Morrow (1977) reported that A. leiala is associated with Eucalyptus pauciflora, Eucalyptus perriniana and Eucalyptus stellulata and Ohmart et al. (1983) recorded the association of A. leiala with Eucalyptus delegatensis.</p> <p>Remarks</p> <p>Anyllis is the only genus of the tribe Aphrophorini distributed in the Australian region. Members of Aphrophorini are widely distributed in the Palaearctic, Nearctic and Oriental regions with generic diversification primarily in the Oriental region. Anyllis differs from other members of Aphrophorini in the following characters: frons in the males usually thin and strongly compressed laterally; antennae with expanded flagellar base having an apical, broadly conical process (a special bulbous sensillum) being adjacent and parallel to the flagellar bristle and nine small coeloconic sensilla on ventral side, lacking placoid sensilla subapically (Aphrophorini usually have three large placoid sensilla on apical area of the expanded flagellar base, Liang, unpublished data; see also Liang and Fletcher 2002); hind tibiae with one lateral spur on outer edge (Aphrophorini usually have two lateral spurs on hind tibiae with exception of Sinophora with four to six lateral spurs); basal anal segment in males with a pair of basal anal processes; subgenital plates short and separated from each other; genital styles slender and elongate; aedeagal shaft relatively elongate and slender, covered with fine spines on anterior edge in lateral view. These characters are autapomorphies of Anyllis and strongly support the monophyly of the genus. These may reflect the long independent evolution of Anyllis because of its long isolation from other Aphrophorini, which are predominantly distributed in the Holarctic region (Liang et al. 2005).</p> <p>Anyllis can be easily distinguished from other Australian aphrophorid genera by its punctate dorsum, strongly compressed and depressed frons in males, one lateral spur on hind tibiae and the presence of a pair of basal anal processes on the basal anal segment in males.</p> <p>Distribution</p> <p>Species of Anyllis are currently known from New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, Australian Capital Territory and Tasmania in Australia. No specimens of Anyllis species were collected from Western Australia and Northern Territory, although this is probably an artefact of collection. It appears that the genus is endemic to Australia.</p> <p>Key to the species of Anyllis</p> <p>1. Frons (Figures 2B, 3B) in males strongly compressed and depressed laterally, narrow and keel-like medially, with a distinct median longitudinal carina.. 2 Frons (Figures 4B, 5B) in males moderately bulbous, with an indistinct median longitudinal carina.............................................. 3</p> <p>2. Body more elongate and larger (length male 6.5–6.9 mm, female 8.7–9.0 mm), reddish brown (Figure 1A–D); pygofer with basal anal processes with inner edges in males without fine spines (Figure 2C,E); subgenital plates (Figure 2C,D) apically parabola-like; aedeagal shaft (Figure 2C,G) relatively stout and broad, straight in lateral view, with a gibba-like process on anterior edge subapically in lateral view; Queensland............ A. gibbosus sp. nov. Body smaller and relatively oval (length male 5.1–5.9 mm, female 5.8– 6.8 mm), colour not as above (Figure 1E,F); pygofer with basal anal process with inner edges in males covered with fine spines (Figure 3C,E); subgenital plates (Figure 3C,D) apically bilobed, aedeagal shaft (Figure 3C,G) more slen- der, distinctly arched anteriorly in lateral view, without a gibba on anterior edge in lateral view; Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria and Tasmania......................................................... A. leiala Kirkaldy</p> <p>3. Body relatively elongate and large, length male 5.8–6.0 mm, female 7.0– 7.2 mm; genital styles more narrow and slender, apex hook-like in ventral view; aedeagal shaft elongate and slender (see Liang et al. 2005: 304, figs 12–16); Tasmania..................................... A. spinostylus Liang Body relatively smaller and more oval, length male 4.5–5.1 mm, female 6.0 mm; genital styles relatively shorter and broader, apex bidentate in ventral view (Figures 4C,F,G, 5C,F,G); aedeagal shaft short and stout (Figures 4C,G, 5C,G).................................................................. 4</p> <p>4. Body slightly larger, length male 5.0– 5.1 mm, female 6.0 mm; vertex with a median longitudinal carina (Figures 1K, 5A); pronotum with median longitudinal carina obsolete on posterior half (Figures 1K, 5A); pygofer with basal anal processes with inner edges covered with fine spines on apical two-thirds (Figure 5E); New South Wales and Victoria............... A. tiegsi (China) Body distinctly small, short and oval, length male 4.5–4.8 mm, female unknown; vertex and pronotum without median longitudinal carina (Figures 1G, 4A); pygofer with basal anal processes with inner edges covered with fine spines on apical half (Figure 4C,E); Tasmania.................................................... A. pseudotiegsi sp. nov.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C96E87A3FFD2B957FDE4EECCFBB80AE2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Liang, Ai-Ping;Wang, Rong-Rong	Liang, Ai-Ping, Wang, Rong-Rong (2012): A revision of the endemic Australian spittlebug genus Anyllis Kirkaldy (Hemiptera: Aphrophoridae) with descriptions of two new species. Journal of Natural History 46 (15 - 16): 1005-1023, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2011.651646, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2011.651646
C96E87A3FFD6B958FDFBEE8CFDFB0F63.text	C96E87A3FFD6B958FDFBEE8CFDFB0F63.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Anyllis gibbosus Liang & Wang 2012	<div><p>Anyllis gibbosus sp. nov.</p> <p>(Figures 1A–D, 2A–G)</p> <p>Description</p> <p>Body large, distinctly elongate and slender, length (from apex of vertex to tip of forewings): male (n = 9), 6.5–6.9 mm; female (n = 3), 8.7–9.0 mm.</p> <p>General colour reddish brown, vertex, pronotum and scutellum covered with fuscous punctures, anterior margin of tylus and median carina of pronotum black, scutellum with median line suffused with yellowish white; head beneath reddish brown, frons suffused with dark brown, antennal sockets, scape and pedicel reddish brown; rostrum with apical segment dark brown; thorax beneath pale yellowish with pleurae partly brownish; legs pale yellowish, claws brownish, tips of spines on hind tibiae and tarsi black; forewings (Figure 1A–D) reddish brown, the extreme costal area, a small costal marking beyond middle, a relatively large subtriangular costal marking at subapical one-third, whitish; some indistinct spots scattered on clavus and corium, the subapical area of calvus and the cellar areas at apical one-fifth very pale whitish; hindwings pale brown, covered with brown hairs, veins brown; abdomen fuscous with segmental margins ochraceous.</p> <p>External structure as in the generic description. Head (Figures 1A,C, 2B) maximum width (including eyes) 3.7–4.0 times as long as median length. Vertex (Figures 1A,C, 2B) with a distinct median carina, median length 0.4–0.5 times as long as length of pronotum medially. Frons (Figures 1B,D, 2A) in the males very strongly compressed and depressed laterally, thin in lateral view, median longitudinal carina distinct. Pronotum (Figures 1A,C, 2B) with median longitudinal carina reaching to posterior margin of pronotum, median length 0.5–0.6 times as long as maximum width.</p> <p>Male genitalia with pygofer (Figure 2C) high, wider ventrally than dorsally, anterior and posterior margins nearly straight and quadrate in lateral view. Basal anal processes (Figure 2C,E) elongate, slender and curved, inner margins without fine spines. Subgenital plates (Figure 2C,D) relatively elongate, apically parabola-like. Genital styles (Figure 2C,D,F,G) relatively elongate and slender, broad mesially, narrowed to apex over distal one-third, apically bidentate. Aedeagal shaft (Figure 2C,G) short and broad, straight, with a gibba-like process on anterior edge subapically in lateral view, the process with its semicircular outer edge covered with fine spines; gonopore dorsal.</p> <p>Material examined</p> <p>Holotype. Male, [Australia, Queensland] 6.4 km west of Paluma, Qld, 900 m, 25 April 1969 (I.F.B. Common &amp; M.S. Upton) (ANIC).</p> <p>Paratypes. [Australia, Queensland] six males, three females, same data as holotype (ANIC); two males, Mt Edith, 29 km northeast of Atherton, Q., 1020 m above sea level, 18 March 1964 (I.F.B. Common and M.S. Upton) (ANIC).</p> <p>Etymology</p> <p>This new species is named for the presence of a gibba-like process on the anterior edge of the aedeagal shaft subapically in lateral view (Figures 2E–G).</p> <p>Distribution</p> <p>Australia (Queensland).</p> <p>Remarks</p> <p>This is the largest species currently known in the genus. It can be easily distinguished from other known species in the genus by its largest size, more elongate and slen- der body (Figure 1A–D) and the male genital structure, especially the aedeagal shaft with a gibba-like process on anterior edge subapically in lateral view (Figure 2C,G). Externally this species is similar to A. leiala Kirkaldy, but differs from the latter in its vertex, pronotum and mesonotum covered with fuscous punctures, pronotum with the median longitudinal carina black, and the scutellum with median line suffused with yellowish white, in addition to the differences in the body size and the male genital characters mentioned above.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C96E87A3FFD6B958FDFBEE8CFDFB0F63	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Liang, Ai-Ping;Wang, Rong-Rong	Liang, Ai-Ping, Wang, Rong-Rong (2012): A revision of the endemic Australian spittlebug genus Anyllis Kirkaldy (Hemiptera: Aphrophoridae) with descriptions of two new species. Journal of Natural History 46 (15 - 16): 1005-1023, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2011.651646, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2011.651646
C96E87A3FFD8B95DFDFDED67FEDF0FD3.text	C96E87A3FFD8B95DFDFDED67FEDF0FD3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Anyllis leiala Kirkaldy 1906	<div><p>Anyllis leiala Kirkaldy</p> <p>(Figures 1E,F, 3A–G)</p> <p>Anyllis leiala Kirkaldy, 1906: 386; Metcalf, 1961: 63; Liang and Fletcher, 2003: 86, fig. 2; Liang et al., 2005: 305. Syntype one male, Australia (Queensland: Kuranda) (BPBM) [examined].</p> <p>Aphrophorinella tonnoiri Lallemand 1946: 195; Metcalf, 1962: 551. Syntypes six males, nine females, Australia (Tasmania) (BMNH) [examined]. [Synonymized by Evans 1966: 317.]</p> <p>Description</p> <p>Length (from apex of vertex to tip of forewings): males (n = 36), 5.1–5.9 mm; females (n = 15), 5.8–6.8 mm.</p> <p>General colour ochraceous brown, carinae on vertex and pronotum suffused with brown, scutellum with brown suffusion medially; head beneath dark brown to black, frons suffused with black, and antennal sockets, scape and pedicel blackish; rostrum with apical segment dark brown; thorax beneath dark brown with pleurae partly ochraceous; legs and claws dark brown, femora with apical part and hind tibiae and tarsi pale yellowish, fore and middle tibiae brown, tips of spines on hind tibiae and tarsi black; forewings (Figure 1E,F) dark brown, clavus ochraceous, apex of clavus marked with hyaline white, with three hyaline white areas on costal area: the first very narrow and small, situated at basal costal area; the second near middle, short and sub-rectangular; the third subapical, larger than the second, nearly oval; hindwings pale brown, covered with brown hairs, veins brown; abdomen fuscous with segmental margins ochraceous.</p> <p>External structure as in the generic description. Head (Figures 1E, 3A) maximum width (including eyes) 4.0–4.7 times as long as median length. Vertex (Figures 1E, 3A) with median carina distinct, median length 0.3–0.4 times as long as length of pronotum medially. Frons (Figures 1F, 3B) in the males strongly compressed and depressed laterally, median longitudinal carina distinct. Pronotum (Figures 1E, 3A) with median longitudinal carina reaching to posterior margin of pronotum, median length 0.5–0.6 times as long as maximum width.</p> <p>Male genitalia with pygofer (Figure 3C) high, slightly wider ventrally than dorsally, anterior margin concave submedially, posterior margin slightly produced posteriorly subapically in lateral view. Basal anal processes (Figure 3C,E) elongate and curved, inner margins covered with distinct fine spines. Subgenital plates (Figure 3C,D) relatively long, apically bilobed, both plates separated from each other and leaving a V-shaped empty space between them. Genital styles (Figure 3C,D,F,G) relatively slen- der, with apical half narrowed towards apex, curved and apically bidentate. Aedeagal shaft (Figure 3C,G) short and sinuate, distinctly arched posteriorly medially in lateral view, anterior edge covered with many fine spines in lateral view.</p> <p>Type material examined</p> <p>Anyllis leiala Kirkaldy 1906, Syntype one male, Queensland: Kuranda, August 1904 (Perkins) (BPBM). Aphrophorinella tonnoiri Lallemand 1946, syntypes six males, nine females, Tasmania: Cradle Mountain, Alpine Creek, Mt Hartz, A.L. Tonnoir; Margate, Muir; Mt Wellington, C. Davis; New South Wales: Mt Victoria, J.W. Evans (BMNH).</p> <p>Anyllis leiala Kirkaldy 1906, Syntype one male, Queensland: Kuranda, August 1904 (Perkins) (BPBM). Aphrophorinella tonnoiri Lallemand 1946, Syntypes six males, nine females, Tasmania: Cradle Mountain, Alpine Creek, Mt Hartz, A.L. Tonnoir; Margate, Muir; Mt Wellington, C. Davis; New South Wales: Mt Victoria, J.W. Evans (BMNH).</p> <p>Other material examined</p> <p>Australia, Tasmania: four males, Lake Leake, T., 600 m, 27 February 1963 (I.F.B. Common and M.S. Upton); two males, Eaglehawk Neck, T., 26 February 1963, I.F.B. Common and M.S. Upton; three males, Lyell Hwy. at Franklin R., 55 km, esastsoutheast Queenstown, 400 m, 19 February 1980 (A. Newton and M. Thayer) (all in ANIC), open Eucalyptus forest, window trap; [green label]. If designated as holotype specimen must be returned to Australia (AMNH). Australia, Victoria: five males, Mt Wellington, T. 720 m, 25 February 1963 (I.F.B. Common and M.S. Upton) (ANIC). Australia, New South Wales: one male, 8 km northwest of Coffs Harbour, NSW, 1 November 1965 (M.S. Upton); one male, same data as preceding but 240 m; one male, one female, 35.34 ◦ S, 148.47 ◦ E, Mt Gingera, ACT, 23 February 1984 (A. Calder and M. Stevens); three males, one female, 36.12 ◦ S, 148.43 ◦ E, Dainers Gap, NSW, 6 February 1974 (P. Morrow), Ex Eucalyptus pauciflora, 1585 m, E. pauciflora, E. stellulata and E. perriniana forest; one male, same data as preceding but 14 February 1973; two males, same data but 20 March 1974; one male, same data but February 1973; one male, same data but 21 February 1973; one male, same data but 21 February 1974; one male, same data but 22 January 1974; one male, same data but 28 February 1973; one male, same data but 29 January 1973 (all in ANIC); two males, Illawarra, NSW, no date (H. Petersen) (USNM); one male, NSW, Kuringai Chase, 8 November 1967 (J. and M. Sedlacek) (BPBM); one male, NSW Roy. Nat. Park, 40 km south of Sydney, 23 April 1960 (C.W. O’Brien), dry sclerophyll forestry (AMNH); one male, Sydney, November 1967 (J. and M. Sedlacek) (BPBM).</p> <p>Distribution</p> <p>Australia (throughout the eastern part of Australia from north Queensland to Tasmania).</p> <p>Remarks</p> <p>Anyllis leiala is one of the most common species of Australian spittlebugs. It is frequently attracted to lights and can be swept from a wide range of shrubby native plants (Fletcher 2010; Liang and Fletcher 2003). This species can be distinguished from other known species in the genus by its strongly compressed and depressed frons with distinct median carina and the minutiae of the male genital structure (Figure 3C–G). It is similar to A. gibbosus sp. nov., but can be separated from the latter by its body being distinctly smaller and relatively oval in dorsal view (Figure 1E,F), the pygofer with the basal anal processes with inner margins covered with distinct fine spines (Figure 3C,E) and the aedeagal shaft relatively narrow, sinuate, mesially distinctly arched posteriorly in lateral view and the anterior edge without a gibba-like process subapically (Figure 3C,G).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C96E87A3FFD8B95DFDFDED67FEDF0FD3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Liang, Ai-Ping;Wang, Rong-Rong	Liang, Ai-Ping, Wang, Rong-Rong (2012): A revision of the endemic Australian spittlebug genus Anyllis Kirkaldy (Hemiptera: Aphrophoridae) with descriptions of two new species. Journal of Natural History 46 (15 - 16): 1005-1023, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2011.651646, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2011.651646
C96E87A3FFDDB95FFE13ED96FCF3099C.text	C96E87A3FFDDB95FFE13ED96FCF3099C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Anyllis pseudotiegsi Liang & Wang 2012	<div><p>Anyllis pseudotiegsi sp. nov.</p> <p>(Figures 1G–H, 4A–G)</p> <p>Description</p> <p>Small, oval species, length (from apex of vertex to tip of forewings): male (n = 3), 4.5–4.8 mm.</p> <p>General colour stramineous brown, frons pale yellowish with base black, clypeus pale yellowish, antennal sockets, scape and pedicel black; rostrum with apical segment brown; thorax beneath brownish; legs and claws dark brown, hind coxae and trochanters pale yellowish, hind tibiae and tarsi pale brown, tips of spines on hind tibiae and tarsi black; forewings (Figure 1G,H) fuscous, the apical marginal area blackish, with the following areas or fasciae whitish: the extreme basal costal area, an oblique fascia running from middle costal margin to clavus beyond apex of scutellum, a subtriangular marking on the subapical costal and subcostal area (the veins within the marking brown) and an indistinct, narrow, oblique fascia running from the inner basal edge of this whitish subapical costal and subcostal marking to the claval apex; the apex of clavus and the subapical corium whitish; hindwings hyaline, covered with brown hairs, veins brown; abdomen black with segmental margins white.</p> <p>External structure as in the generic description. Head (Figures 1G, 4A) maximum width (including eyes) 3.3–3.4 times as long as median length. Vertex (Figures 1G, 4A) without median carina, median length 0.5–0.6 times as long as length of pronotum medially. Frons (Figures 1H, 4B) in the males moderately bulbous, not strongly compressed laterally, median longitudinal carina indistinct. Pronotum (Figures 1G, 4A) without median longitudinal carina, median length 0.5–0.6 times as long as maximum width.</p> <p>Male genitalia with pygofer (Figure 4C) high, slightly narrow, width ventrally nearly as wide as dorsally, subquadrate in lateral view, anterior margin sinuate, dorsal posterior margin angularly produced in lateral view. Basal anal processes (Figure 4C,E) relatively short, directed posterodorsally in lateral view, inner edge covered with fine spines on apical half. Subgenital plates (Figure 4C,D) short, apically bilobed, both plates widely separated from each other. Genital styles (Figure 4C,D,F,G) relatively short, narrow and slender, evenly tapered sub-basally to apex, apically bidentate. Aedeagal shaft (Figure 4C,G) short and stout, slightly arched anteriorly in lateral view, anterior edge covered with many tiny spines in lateral view; gonopore apical.</p> <p>Material examined</p> <p>Holotype. male, [Australia] 5 km east of Stanley, Tas., 15 November 1975, K.R. Norris (ANIC).</p> <p>Paratypes. [Australia:] two males, same data as holotype (ANIC).</p> <p>Etymology</p> <p>This new species is named for its general appearance being similar to A. tiegsi (China, 1952).</p> <p>Distribution</p> <p>Australia (Tasmania).</p> <p>Remarks</p> <p>This is the smallest species currently known in Anyllis. This species can be distinguished from other known species in the genus by its small body size and distinctly oval body form (Figure 1G,H), vertex and pronotum without median carina (Figures 1G, 4A), frons with indistinct median carina (Figure 4B) and the male genitalic structure (Figure 4C–G). In external appearance, this species is similar to A. tiegsi (China, 1952), but differs from the latter in the smaller body; vertex (Figure 4B) without median carina, median longitudinal carina on pronotum (Figure 4A) completely obsolete, and the pygofer with the basal anal process directed posterodorsally, with inner edge covered with fine spines only on apical half (Figure 4C,E).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C96E87A3FFDDB95FFE13ED96FCF3099C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Liang, Ai-Ping;Wang, Rong-Rong	Liang, Ai-Ping, Wang, Rong-Rong (2012): A revision of the endemic Australian spittlebug genus Anyllis Kirkaldy (Hemiptera: Aphrophoridae) with descriptions of two new species. Journal of Natural History 46 (15 - 16): 1005-1023, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2011.651646, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2011.651646
C96E87A3FFDFB941FE2EE829FCC40ECA.text	C96E87A3FFDFB941FE2EE829FCC40ECA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Anyllis spinostylus Liang Body 2005	<div><p>Anyllis spinostylus Liang</p> <p>(Figures 1I–J)</p> <p>Anyllis spinostylus Liang in Liang et al., 2005: 301–307, figs. 10–16. Holotype male, Australia (Tasmania) (BPBM) [examined].</p> <p>Description</p> <p>Length (from apex of vertex to tip of forewings): male (n = 4), 5.8–6.0 mm; female (n = 5), 7.0– 7.2 mm.</p> <p>General colour ochraceous brown, posterior area of pronotum pale fuscous, scutellum with brown suffusion medially; head beneath ochraceous, antennal sockets and flagellar base pale fuscous, rostrum with apical segment brown; thorax beneath ochraceous with pleurae partly brownish; legs ochraceous, claws dark brown, fore and middle tarsi brown, tips of spines on hind tibiae and tarsi black; forewings (Figure 1I,J) fuscous, marked with some stramineous spots or irregular markings, with three hyaline white areas on costal area, the first basal and very narrow, the second near middle and being very short and small, and the third subapical, large and elongate, nearly triangular; hindwings hyaline, covered with brown hairs, veins brown; abdomen dark brown to fuscous with segmental margins ochraceous.</p> <p>External structure as in the generic description. Head (Figure 1I) maximum width (including eyes) 3.2–4.0 times as long as median length. Vertex (Figure 1I) with a distinct median carina, median length 0.4–0.5 times as long as length of pronotum medially. Frons (Figure 1J, also see Liang et al. 2005: 304; fig. 11) in the males moderately bulbous, not strongly compressed laterally, median longitudinal carina indistinct. Pronotum (Figure 1I, also see Liang et al. 2005: 304; fig. 10) with median longitudinal carina obsolete on posterior half, median length 0.6–0.7 times as long as maximum width.</p> <p>Male genitalia with pygofer high, wider ventrally than dorsally, upper posterior end angularly posteriorly produced in lateral view. Anal segments very short and broad, anal style small; basal anal processes robust and straight, with inner edge without fine spines. Subgenital plates very short and small, apically weakly bilobed, outer margin with one very small angular process. Genital styles slender and elongate, angularly expanded laterad medially, apex hook-like in ventral view. Aedeagal shaft distinctly slender and elongate, slightly arched anteriorly in lateral view, anterior– ventral margin with an angular process subapically, upper anterior edge covered with fine spines in lateral view (see Liang et al. 2005: 304; figs 12–16).</p> <p>Material examined</p> <p>Holotype male, Australia: Tasmania, Mt Field, Nat. Park, Dobson Lake, 1000 m, 25 December 1960, collected by J.L. Gressitt, deposited in the Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA (BPBM).</p> <p>Paratypes. Australia: two males, Lake Fenton, Mt Field National Park, Tasmania, 1000 m, 42 ◦ 40.6 ′ S, 146 ◦ 37.4 ′ E, 6 December 1999 (J. Keble-Williams), beating Nothofagus cunninghamii (ASCU); two females, same data but collected on 25 January 2000 (ASCU); one male, one female, Mt Arthur, Wellington Range, Tasmania, 1080 m, 42 ◦ 53.0 ′ S, 147 ◦ 13.1 ′ E, 10 February 2000, J. Keble-Williams, beating Nothofagus cunninghamii (ASCU); one female, Tasmania, Mt Field National Park, Lake Dobson Road, 710 m, 2 February 1980 (A. Newton and M. Thayer), Eucalyptus, Nothofagus forest, window trap; [green label]. If designated as holotype specimen must be returned to Australia (AMNH); one female, Tasmania, Hartz Mts NP, Hartz Road, 800 m, 8–10 February [19]80 (A. Newton and M. Thayer), Eucalyptus Scrub, moor edge; beating Eucalyptus sp.; [green label]. If designated as holotype specimen must be returned to Australia (AMNH).</p> <p>Distribution</p> <p>Australia (Tasmania).</p> <p>Remarks</p> <p>This species can be distinguished from another Tasmanian species A. pseudotiegsi sp. nov. by its relatively elongate body and large size (length male 5.8–6.0 mm, female 7.0– 7.2 mm); vertex with a median carina; pronotum with median carina obsolete on posterior half; forewings (Figure 1I,J) marked with more stramineous spots; genital styles more narrow and slender, apex hook-like in ventral view; and aedeagal shaft elongate and slender (see Liang et al. 2005: 304, figs 12–16).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C96E87A3FFDFB941FE2EE829FCC40ECA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Liang, Ai-Ping;Wang, Rong-Rong	Liang, Ai-Ping, Wang, Rong-Rong (2012): A revision of the endemic Australian spittlebug genus Anyllis Kirkaldy (Hemiptera: Aphrophoridae) with descriptions of two new species. Journal of Natural History 46 (15 - 16): 1005-1023, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2011.651646, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2011.651646
C96E87A3FFC1B943FE32ECE5FC9F0923.text	C96E87A3FFC1B943FE32ECE5FC9F0923.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Anyllis tiegsi (China 1952)	<div><p>Anyllis tiegsi (China)</p> <p>(Figures 1K–L, 5A–G)</p> <p>Neoaphrophora tiegsi China, 1952: 791, figs. 1G,H, 2A – C; Metcalf, 1962: 431; Evans, 1966: 316, 317; Liang et al., 2005: 305. Holotype male, Australia (Victoria) (BMNH) [examined].</p> <p>Anyllis tiegsi (China); Liang and Fletcher, 2003: 86–87, fig. 3; Liang et al., 2005: 301–305.</p> <p>Description</p> <p>Length (from apex of vertex to tip of forewings): male (n = 2), 5.0– 5.1 mm; female (n = 1), 6.0 mm.</p> <p>General colour pattern and external appearance similar to A. pseudotiegsi sp. nov. General colour stramineous brown, scutellum with brown suffusion medially; frons stramineous with base dark brown; antennal sockets, scape and pedicel black or dark brown; clypeus stramineous; rostrum with apical segment pale yellowish; thorax beneath dark brown with pleurae partly yellowish; legs and claws dark brown, hind coxae and trochanters pale yellowish, hind tibiae and tarsi pale brown, tips of spines on hind tibiae and tarsi black; forewings (Figure 1K,L) brown, apical marginal area nearly black, clavus with basal two-thirds stramineous, corium with the following areas or fasciae whitish: the extreme basal costal area, an oblique fascia running from middle costal margin to clavus beyond apex of scutellum, a subtriangular marking on the subapical costal and subcostal area (the veins within the marking brown) and an oblique fascia running from the inner basal edge of this whitish subapical costal and subcostal marking to the claval apex; the apex of clavus and two irregular spots on subapical corium whitish. Abdomen black with segmental margins white. Female with black punctures much reduced ventrally, legs with femora and pleura ochreous.</p> <p>External structure as in the generic description. Head (Figures 1K, 5A) maximum width (including eyes) 2.9–3.5 times as long as median length. Vertex (Figures 1K, 5A) with a median carina, median length 0.6–0.7 times as long as length of pronotum medially. Frons (Figures 1L, 5B) in males moderately bulbous, not strongly compressed laterally, median longitudinal carina indistinct. Pronotum (Figures 1K, 5A) with median longitudinal carina obsolete on posterior half, median length 0.5–0.6 times as long as maximum width.</p> <p>Male genitalia with pygofer (Figure 5C) high, wider ventrally than dorsally, anterior margin concave medially and posterior margin nearly straight in lateral view. Basal anal processes (Figure 5C,E) relatively short, the inner edges covered with fine spines on apical two-thirds. Subgenital plates (Figure 5C,D) relatively short and broad, apically distinctly bilobed, both plates widely separated each other. Genital styles (Figure 5C,D,F,G) relatively stout, moderately broad mesially, evenly narrowed towards apex over apical one-third in lateral view, apically bidentate. Aedeagal shaft (Figure 5C,G) relatively stout and broad, slightly arched anteriorly, anterior edge covered with many fine spines in lateral view; gonopore dorsal.</p> <p>Material examined</p> <p>Holotype Male, [Australia:] Victoria, Melbourne, O.W. Tiegs (BMNH).</p> <p>Holotype ♂, [Australia:] Victoria, Melbourne, O.W. Tiegs (BMNH).</p> <p>Other material examined</p> <p>Australia, New South Wales: one male, New England National Park, NSW, 11 February 1968 (D.H. Colless) (ANIC). Australia, Victoria: one female, 15 km west Ballarat, Vic., 12 November 1969 (E.F. Riek) (ANIC).</p> <p>Distribution</p> <p>Australia (Victoria and the higher parts of southeast New South Wales).</p> <p>Remarks</p> <p>This species is similar to A. pseudotiegsi sp. nov. from Tasmania but can be distinguished from the latter by the slightly larger body (length male 5.0– 5.1 mm, female 6.0 mm); vertex with a median longitudinal carina (Figures 1K, 5A); pronotum with median longitudinal carina obsolete on posterior half (Figures 1K, 5A); pygofer with basal anal processes with inner edges covered with fine spines on apical two-thirds (Figure 5E) and the minutiae of the male genitalia (Figure 5A–G).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C96E87A3FFC1B943FE32ECE5FC9F0923	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Liang, Ai-Ping;Wang, Rong-Rong	Liang, Ai-Ping, Wang, Rong-Rong (2012): A revision of the endemic Australian spittlebug genus Anyllis Kirkaldy (Hemiptera: Aphrophoridae) with descriptions of two new species. Journal of Natural History 46 (15 - 16): 1005-1023, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2011.651646, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2011.651646
