identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
C421D67B7E17FFB45ACAF9EDBF1AFE57.text	C421D67B7E17FFB45ACAF9EDBF1AFE57.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Acanthoscelides infractus (Johnson & Kingsolver 1973) Johnson & Kingsolver 1973	<div><p>Acanthoscelides infractus (Johnson &amp; Kingsolver, 1973), comb n.</p><p>Sennius infractus Johnson &amp; Kingsolver, 1973: 67 –68, 125 (description, key, figures, type, taxonomy, distribution, host); Johnson &amp; Kingsolver, 1981: 419 (catalog); Johnson, 1984: 56 –59 (redescription, male genitalia description, figures); Borowiec, 1987: 181 (figure); Udayagiri &amp; Wadhi, 1989: 104 (catalog).</p><p>Type material (1, MCZ): Holotype female studied by photo (MCZ Online Database), with labels: “M-tee Dist. / Brit. Hond. / Jan-Feb. ’06” “ HOLOTYPE / Sennius infractus / Johnson &amp; Kingsolver” “M.C.Z. / Holotype / 32916” “ Acanthoscelides infractus / (Johnson &amp; Kingsolver, 1973) / Det. J. H. Viana”.</p><p>Remarks. Sennius infractus Johnson &amp; Kingsolver, 1973 was originally described based only on a female collected in Honduras. There is an error in the MCZ catalog number for this specimen, 31966, in Johnson &amp; Kingsolver (1973) and the correct catalog number is MCZ 32916 (MCZ Online Database). Later, Johnson (1984) described the male genitalia of specimens from the same data collection as the female holotype, and indicated it as not belonging to Sennius, but did not indicate its proximity with species of any other genus. In this study male specimens from USNM described by Johnson (1984) with the same data as the holotype were examined, and here this species is here transferred to Acanthoscelides, as Acanthoscelides infractus (NEW COMBINATION), due to proximity with species of megacornis group (Johnson 1990b) and the lack of hinge sclerites in the internal sac of male genitalia.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C421D67B7E17FFB45ACAF9EDBF1AFE57	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Viana, Jéssica Herzog	Viana, Jéssica Herzog (2016): Nomenclatural changes and lectotype designations in the seed-beetle genus Sennius Bridwell: with the synonymization of Megasennius Whitehead & Kingsolver (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae). Zootaxa 4175 (3): 249-260, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4175.3.4
C421D67B7E14FFB45ACAFE4DBDF5FB24.text	C421D67B7E14FFB45ACAFE4DBDF5FB24.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Sennius aequinoctialis (Fåhraeus 1839) Fahraeus 1839	<div><p>Sennius aequinoctialis (Fåhraeus, 1839), comb n.</p><p>Bruchus aequinoctialis Fåhraeus, 1839: 24 (description, distribution); Pic, 1913: 13 (catalog).</p><p>Acanthoscelides aequinoctialis: Blackwelder, 1946: 758 (combination, catalog); Gemminger &amp; Harold, 1873: 3219 (catalog); Wendt, 1978: 35 (type depository); Udayagiri &amp; Wadhi, 1989: 35 (catalog).</p><p>Type material (5, NHRS): Lectotype male with labels: “237” “Colum / bia” “Coll. Chevrol” “ Paratypus ” “ Lectotype / Bruchus aequinoctialis Fåhraeus, 1839 / design. J. H. Viana”. Four paralectotypes with labels: 1, “ Typus ” “ Br. aequinoctialis / Carthag. Colum / bia. Dejean” “ Paralectotype / Bruchus aequinoctialis Fåhraeus, 1839 / J. H. Viana”; 1, “ Paratypus ” “ Br. aequinoctialis / Carthagene Co / lumbia. Dej” “ Paralectotype / Bruchus aequinoctialis Fåhraeus, 1839 / J. H. Viana”; 1, “237” “(preto)” “Colum / bia” “ Paratypus ” “Coll. Chevrol” “ Bruchus / aequinoctialis Dej &lt;illegible letters&gt; 2231. / Sch &lt;illegible letters&gt; C. v p 24, type / aquilas Chr Oliver / Columbia / Carthagene &lt;illegible letters&gt; L. Sebas” “ Paralectotype / Bruchus aequinoctialis Fåhraeus, 1839 / J. H. Viana”; 1, “&lt;illegible letters&gt;” “Colum / bia” “Coll. Chevrol” “ Paralectotype / Bruchus aequinoctialis Fåhraeus, 1839 / J. H. Viana”.</p><p>Remarks. In the original description, Fåhraeus (1839) did not quote the number of studied specimens. Five specimens were received from NHRS, three labeled with the same data as in the original description, “Carthagenam – Columbiae” and “Coll. Chevrol”, one specimen with labels “Colum / bia” “Coll. Chevrol” and one specimen with the "Columbia" label and with a numbered old label (“237”) corresponding to the numbered label in a specimen with "Carthagenam—Columbiae" label. Therefore, the best preserved male specimen is here designated as the lectotype. In this study, Bruchus aequinoctialis is transferred to Sennius, as Sennius aequinoctialis (NEW COMBINATION), due mainly by the presence of the hind femur with one tooth at the inner ventral margin and hinge sclerites in the internal sac of the male genitalia.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C421D67B7E14FFB45ACAFE4DBDF5FB24	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Viana, Jéssica Herzog	Viana, Jéssica Herzog (2016): Nomenclatural changes and lectotype designations in the seed-beetle genus Sennius Bridwell: with the synonymization of Megasennius Whitehead & Kingsolver (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae). Zootaxa 4175 (3): 249-260, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4175.3.4
C421D67B7E14FFB45ACAFADFBA8EF88E.text	C421D67B7E14FFB45ACAFADFBA8EF88E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Sennius amazonicus (Pic 1929) Pic 1929	<div><p>Sennius amazonicus (Pic, 1929), comb n.</p><p>Bruchus amazonicus Pic, 1929a: 26 (description, distribution).</p><p>Acanthoscelides amazonicus: Blackwelder, 1946: 758 (combination, catalog); Udayagiri &amp; Wadhi, 1989: 36 (catalog). Sennius amazonicus: Santos et al., 1997: 883 –886 (host, biology).</p><p>Type material (1, MNHN): Lectotype male with labels: 1, “D r Hahnel. / Amazonas / (Staudinger.)” “ type ” “ amazonicus / n sp” “ Holotype ” “ amazonicus / Pic / det. 70 / J. M. Kingsolver” “ Lectotype / Bruchus amazonicus Pic, 1929 / design. J. H. Viana”.</p><p>Remark. In the original description, Pic does not indicate the number of specimens studied. One specimen was received from MNHN, here designated as a lectotype, with location data identical to what was given in the original description (Amazones) and Pic’s labels " type " and " amazonicus n sp". Santos et al. (1997) cited Acanthoscelides amazonicus as belonging Sennius but no paper was found with this transference. Here it is formally transferred to Sennius, as Sennius amazonicus (NEW COMBINATION), due mainly to the following characters: hind femur with one tooth at inner ventral margin, and internal sac of male genitalia with hinge sclerites.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C421D67B7E14FFB45ACAFADFBA8EF88E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Viana, Jéssica Herzog	Viana, Jéssica Herzog (2016): Nomenclatural changes and lectotype designations in the seed-beetle genus Sennius Bridwell: with the synonymization of Megasennius Whitehead & Kingsolver (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae). Zootaxa 4175 (3): 249-260, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4175.3.4
C421D67B7E15FFB55ACAFF06BB41FBE2.text	C421D67B7E15FFB55ACAFF06BB41FBE2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Sennius batesii (Jekel 1855) Jekel 1855	<div><p>Sennius batesii (Jekel, 1855), comb n.</p><p>Bruchus batesii Jekel, 1855: 2 (description, distribution); Gemminger &amp; Harold. 1873: 3220 (catalog); Pic, 1913: 17 (catalog). Acanthoscelides batesi Blackwelder, 1946: 758 (combination, catalog); Udayagiri &amp; Wadhi, 1989: 39 (catalog). Bruchus subaenescens Pic, 1931: 139 (description, distribution) New Synonymy.</p><p>Acanthoscelides subaenescens: Blackwelder, 1946: 761 (combination, catalog); Udayagiri &amp; Wadhi, 1989: 64 (catalog). Sennius subaenescens: Kingsolver, 1976: 403 (combination, citation).</p><p>Type material (4, BMNH): Bruchus batesii (1): Holotype with labels: 1, “ Type / H.T.” “ Type ” “53314” “ex Mus / W.W.&amp;.” “Amazon / Bates” “Fry Coll. / 1905.100.” “ Bruchus / batesii Jekel / Ins. Saund.” “ Sennius batesii / (Jekel, 1855) / Det. Viana &amp; Ribeiro-Costa” “ Holotype / Bruchus batesii Pic, 1931 / J. H. Viana”.</p><p>Bruchus subaenescens (1): Holotype male with labels: “Corumb” “ type ” “ TYPE ” “ subaenescens / Pic” “ Holotype ♀ / Bruchus / subaenescens / Pic” “ Sennius / subaenescens / Pic / det. 75 / J. M. Kingsolver”.</p><p>Remarks. In the original description of Bruchus batesii, Jekel indicated only one specimen was studied. This specimen was received from BMNH, with labels identical to what was given in the original description, including Jekel's label “ Bruchus / batesii Jekel / Ins. Saund.”. A label was included to explicitly indicate this specimen as holotype. The female type of Bruchus batesii is in poor condition, with glue covering the ventral surface, partially covering the head and the lateral body, and there is a broken tooth on the hind femur. Only the external morphology was studied and compared with other Sennius species, since the type specimen of Bruchus batesii is a female. In Blackwelder’s catalog (1946), the specific name Acanthoscelides batesii (Fåhraeus, 1839) was misspelled as A. batesi, with the subsequent paper (Udayagiri &amp; Wadhi, 1989) propagating this error. Following the instructions of ICZN (1999, Article 33.4), this species is here treated as Sennius batesii (NEW COMBINATION) based mainly on the characters: hind femur with one tooth at inner ventral margin, and internal sac of male genitalia with hinge sclerites.</p><p>I consider B. subaenescens Pic, 1931 (NEW SYNONYM) to be a subjective synonym of Bruchus batesii since there are no remarkable external differences. In the original description of Bruchus subaenescens, Pic does not indicate the number of specimens studied but Kingsolver (1976) designated as holotype the specimen studied.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C421D67B7E15FFB55ACAFF06BB41FBE2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Viana, Jéssica Herzog	Viana, Jéssica Herzog (2016): Nomenclatural changes and lectotype designations in the seed-beetle genus Sennius Bridwell: with the synonymization of Megasennius Whitehead & Kingsolver (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae). Zootaxa 4175 (3): 249-260, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4175.3.4
C421D67B7E15FFB25ACAFB1EBF3AFC83.text	C421D67B7E15FFB25ACAFB1EBF3AFC83.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Sennius bicoloripes (Pic 1930) Pic 1930	<div><p>Sennius bicoloripes (Pic, 1930)</p><p>Bruchus bicoloripes Pic, 1930a:37 (description, distribution); Bondar, 1936: 40 (diagnosis, host, distribution); Zacher, 1952: 472 (host), 461 (erroneous host association, conflated with Merobruchus bicoloripes (Pic, 1930)) .</p><p>Acanthoscelides bicoloripes: Blackwelder, 1946: 758 (combination, catalog); Udayagiri &amp; Wadhi, 1989: 39 (catalog).</p><p>Sennius bicoloripes: Kingsolver &amp; Silva, 1991: 413 (combination, citation).</p><p>Bruchus bicoloripes var. jatayensis Pic, 1930a:37 (description). New Synonymy.</p><p>Acanthoscelides bicoloripes var. jatayensis: Blackwelder, 1946: 758 (combination, catalog); Udayagiri &amp; Wadhi, 1989: 39 (catalog).</p><p>Bruchus bicoloripes var. indiversipes Pic, 1930a:37 (description). New Synonymy.</p><p>Acanthoscelides bicoloripes var. indiversipes: Blackwelder, 1946: 758 (combination, catalog); Udayagiri &amp; Wadhi, 1989: 39 (catalog).</p><p>Type material (7, MNHN): Bruchus bicoloripes: Two syntypes with labels: 1, “ Brazil . / Bahia. / 1929. / Dr. G Bondar. / On wild / Leguminous / plant / 322.” “ type ” “ bicoloripes / Pic ” “ HOLOTYPE ” “ Bruchus / bicoloripes / Pic / det. / J.M.Kingsolver ” “ Museum Paris / Coll. M. Pic” “ ♀ ” “ Sennius bicoloripes / (Pic, 1930) / det J.H. Viana 2014” “ Syntype / Bruchus bicoloripes / Pic, 1930 / J. H. Viana ”; 1, “ Brazil . / Bahia. / 1929./ Dr. G Bondar. / On wild / Leguminous / plant / 322.” “ bicoloripes / Pic ” “ Paratype ” “Museum Paris / Coll. M. Pic” “ Sennius bicoloripes / (Pic, 1930) / det J. H. Viana 2014” “ Syntype / Bruchus bicoloripes / Pic, 1930 / J. H. Viana ”.</p><p>Bruchus bicoloripes var. indiversipes: Two syntypes deposited with labels: 1, “Serra de / &lt;illegible letters&gt;” “ type ” “ HOLOTYPE ” “ var. indiversipes / Pic” “ Bruchus Pic / bicoloripes / v. indiversipes / det. J.M.Kinsolver” “Museum Paris / Coll. M. Pic” “ Sennius bicoloripes / (Pic, 1930) / det J. H. Viana 2014” “ Syntype / Bruchus bicoloripes var. indiversipes / Pic, 1930 / J. H. Viana”; 1, “Bruch 1907” “ Brasilien / Nova Teutônia / Fritz Plaumann” “ Sennius bicoloripes / (Pic, 1930) / det J. H. Viana 2014” “ Syntype / Bruchus bicoloripes var. indiversipes / Pic, 1930 / J. H. Viana”.</p><p>Bruchus bicoloripes var. jatayensis: Three syntypes with labels: 1, “ Jatahy / Prov. Goyas . Brésil ” “ type ” “ HOLOTYPE ” “ v. jatayensis / Pic” “G117” “ Bruchus / bicoloripes / v. jatayensis / Pic / det. / J.M.Kingsolver ” “Museum Paris / Coll. M. Pic” “ Sennius bicoloripes / (Pic, 1930) / det J. H. Viana 2014” “ Syntype / Bruchus bicoloripes var. jatayensis / Pic, 1930 / J. H. Viana ”; 1, “ Jatahy / Prov. Goyas . Brésil / Sept. A Nov. 97 ” “ PARATYPE ” “ Museum Paris / Coll. M. Pic” “ Sennius bicoloripes / (Pic, 1930) / det J. H. Viana 2014” “ Syntype / Bruchus bicoloripes var. jatayensis / Pic, 1930 / J. H. Viana ”; 1, “ Jatahy / Prov . Goyas. Brési / Dec. 97 – Janv. 98” “ PARATYPE ” “ Museum Paris / Coll. M. Pic” “ Sennius bicoloripes / (Pic, 1930) / det J. H. Viana 2014”. “ Syntype / Bruchus bicoloripes var. jatayensis / Pic, 1930 / J. H. Viana ”.</p><p>Remark. Bruchus bicoloripes: Two females were received from the MNHN. In the original descriptions, Pic does not indicate the number of specimens studied. The labels of the two specimens are identical and the locality data match what is given in the original description (Brésil) and Pic’s handwritten label " bicoloripes Pic ", but only one specimen is labeled "type". Here both specimens are considered as syntypes.</p><p>Bruchus bicoloripes var. indiversipes: Two females were received from the MNHN. In the original descriptions, Pic does not indicate the number of specimens studied. The labels of the two specimens are identical, the locality data are the same as quoted in the original description (Brésil), and both are in Pic’s handwritten label " var. indiversipes Pic "; but only one specimen has the label "type". Here both specimens were considered as syntypes and also the variety B. bicoloripes var. indiversipes (NEW SYNONYM) is synonymized with Bruchus bicoloripes .</p><p>Bruchus bicoloripes var. jatayensis: Three females were received from the MNHN. Here the three specimens are treated as syntypes and B. bicoloripes var. jatayensis (NEW SYNONYM) is synonymized with Bruchus bicoloripes .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C421D67B7E15FFB25ACAFB1EBF3AFC83	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Viana, Jéssica Herzog	Viana, Jéssica Herzog (2016): Nomenclatural changes and lectotype designations in the seed-beetle genus Sennius Bridwell: with the synonymization of Megasennius Whitehead & Kingsolver (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae). Zootaxa 4175 (3): 249-260, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4175.3.4
C421D67B7E12FFB25ACAFC3EBD1EFA4F.text	C421D67B7E12FFB25ACAFC3EBD1EFA4F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Sennius diosanus (Pic 1930) Pic 1930	<div><p>Sennius diosanus (Pic, 1930), comb n.</p><p>Bruchus diosanus Pic, 1930:13 (description, distribution).</p><p>Acanthoscelides diosanus: Blackwelder, 1946: 759 (combination, catalog); Udayagiri &amp; Wadhi, 1989: 44 (catalog).</p><p>Type material (1, MNHN): Lectotype male with labels: 1, “Madre d. Dios / S.O Peru ” “ type ” “ diosanus / n sp” “ HOLOTYPE ” “ Bruchus / diosanus / Pic / det. 75 / J.M.Kingsolver” “Museum Paris / Coll. M. Pic” “ Sennius diosanus / (Pic, 1930) / det J. H. Viana 2014” “ Lectotype / Bruchus diosanus Pic, 1930 / design. J. H. Viana”.</p><p>Remark. In the original description, Pic does not indicate the number of specimens studied. The labels of the type specimen received from MNHN are identical to the data given in the original description (Pérou) and also with Pic’s handwritten label " type " and " diosanus Pic ". The type material of Bruchus diosanus, here designated as a lectotype, is in poor condition with little pubescence remaining. However, it was possible to study the male genitalia and here this species is here treated as Sennius diosanus (NEW COMBINATION) based mainly on the character: internal sac of male genitalia with hinge sclerites.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C421D67B7E12FFB25ACAFC3EBD1EFA4F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Viana, Jéssica Herzog	Viana, Jéssica Herzog (2016): Nomenclatural changes and lectotype designations in the seed-beetle genus Sennius Bridwell: with the synonymization of Megasennius Whitehead & Kingsolver (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae). Zootaxa 4175 (3): 249-260, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4175.3.4
C421D67B7E12FFB35ACAFA75BC2FFDCE.text	C421D67B7E12FFB35ACAFA75BC2FFDCE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Sennius lebasii (Fåhraeus 1839) Fahraeus 1839	<div><p>Sennius lebasii (Fåhraeus 1839)</p><p>Bruchus lebasii Fåhraeus, 1839: 25 (description, distribution); Jekel, 1855: 2 (catalog).</p><p>Bruchus lebasi: Pic, 1913: 30 (catalog); Gemminger &amp; Harold, 1873: 3225 (catalog).</p><p>Acanthoscelides lebasi: Blackwelder, 1946: 760 (combination, catalog).</p><p>Sennius lebasi: Kingsolver, 1979: 342 (combination); Janzen, 1980: 949 (ecology, host); Johnson &amp; Kingsolver, 1981: 419 (catalog, distribution); Johnson, 1984: 63 (distribution, host); Hetz &amp; Johnson, 1988: 132 (parasitoids); Udayagiri &amp; Wadhi, 1989:104 (catalog); Poole &amp; Gentili, 1996: 181 (catalog); Luna-Cozar et al., 2002: 26 (list); Silva et al., 2003: 269 (citation); Turnbow et al., 2003: 276 (list); Kingsolver, 2004: 200 (key, diagnosis, figures, host, distribution); Romero- Nápoles &amp; Johnson, 2004: 627 (checklist); Lorea-Barocio et al., 2006: 519 (distribution, host); Anton, 2010: 350 (distribution, introduced); Pikart et al., 2011: 379 (citation); Romero-Nápoles &amp; Westcott, 2011: 12 (distribution, host); Viana &amp; Ribeiro-Costa, 2013b: 516 –518 (redescription, distribution, lectotype designation, host, figures); Gómez, 2013: 149 (diagnosis, host, distribution); Pérez et al. 2013: 72 –74 (host, key, diagnosis, host, distribution).</p><p>Bruchus rufescens Motschulsky, 1874: 222 (description, distribution); Pic, 1913: 45 (catalog); Johnson, 1977: 118 (synonym).</p><p>Acanthoscelides rufescens: Blackwelder, 1946: 761 (combination, catalog).</p><p>Sennius rufescens: Johnson, 1977: 118 (combination, host).</p><p>Bruchus celatus Sharp, 1885: 499 (description, distribution); Pic, 1913: 20 (catalog); Kingsolver, 1979: 342 (synonym).</p><p>Acanthoscelides celatus: Blackwelder, 1946: 759 (combination, catalog).</p><p>Sennius celatus: Bottimer, 1961: 294 (combination, distribution, host); 1968: 1026, 1039 (distribution); Moldenke, 1971: 108 (host); Johnson &amp; Kingsolver, 1973: 31 (description, key, figures, type, taxonomy, distribution, host); Whitehead &amp; Kingsolver, 1975b: 157 (citation); Wilcox, 1975: 157 (list); Janzen, 1977: 417 (ecology, host); Johnson, 1980: 28 (ecology); Borowiec, 1987: 181 (figure); Hetz &amp; Johnson, 1988: 133 (parasitoid).</p><p>Bruchus atriceps Pic, 1927a: 12 (description, distribution); Morimoto, 1990: 133 (synonym, list).</p><p>Bruchidius atripes (sic): Chûjô, 1937a: 193 (combination).</p><p>Bruchidius atriceps: Chûjô, 1937b: 57 (description, key); Udayagiri &amp; Wadhi, 1989:119 (catalog).</p><p>Remark. In his 1913 catalog, Pic misspelled the specific name Bruchus lebasii Fåhraeus, 1839 as Bruchus lebasi, with subsequent papers propagating this error. Following the instructions of ICZN (1999, Article 33.4) this species is here treated as Sennius lebasii .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C421D67B7E12FFB35ACAFA75BC2FFDCE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Viana, Jéssica Herzog	Viana, Jéssica Herzog (2016): Nomenclatural changes and lectotype designations in the seed-beetle genus Sennius Bridwell: with the synonymization of Megasennius Whitehead & Kingsolver (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae). Zootaxa 4175 (3): 249-260, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4175.3.4
C421D67B7E13FFB35ACAFDF4BBA2FADD.text	C421D67B7E13FFB35ACAFDF4BBA2FADD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Sennius muricatus (Sharp 1885) Sharp 1885	<div><p>Sennius muricatus (Sharp, 1885), comb n.</p><p>Bruchus muricatus Sharp, 1885: 464 (description, distribution); Pic, 1913: 36 (distribution).</p><p>Acanthoscelides muricatus: Blackwelder, 1946: 760 (combination, catalog); Janzen, 1972: 975 (distribution, host); Wilcox, 1975: 6 (catalog); Janzen, 1980: 948 (ecology, host).</p><p>Megasennius muricatus: Whitehead &amp; Kingsolver, 1975a: 460 –465 (combination, type, redescription, figures, host, distribution); Janzen, 1977: 417 (host); Johnson, 1980: 31 (host); Johnson &amp; Kingsolver, 1981: 420 (distribution); Borowiec, 1987: 8, 21, 103, 104, 170, 181, 197 (citation, distribution, host, figures); Udayagiri &amp; Wadhi, 1989: 84 (catalog); Turnbow et al., 2003: 275 (distribution).</p><p>Type material (2, BMNH): Syntypes not studied, deposited in BMHN with locality: Bugaba, Panama .</p><p>Remark. Bruchus muricatus Sharp, 1885 is here transferred to Sennius due the hind femur with one tooth at inner ventral margin, and internal sac of male genitalia with hinge sclerites. The boundary between the genera Megasennius (monotypic) and Sennius was not supported in the cladistic analysis of the genus Sennius (Viana, 2014) . Except for the crossed hinge sclerites in male genitalia, other diagnostic characters described by Whitehead &amp; Kingsolver (1975a) for Megasennius, such as an expanded postocular lobe, teeth near the base of the elytral striae, hind femur with large spine, hind tibia with long mucro, have been described in different combinations of characters for some South American Sennius species (Viana &amp; Costa Ribeiro-2013a, b, 2014). Therefore this species is here treated as Sennius muricatus (NEW COMBINATION) and, as Megasennius is monotypic and Sennius muricatus is its type species, here Megasennius is also synonymized with Sennius (NEW SYNONYM).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C421D67B7E13FFB35ACAFDF4BBA2FADD	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Viana, Jéssica Herzog	Viana, Jéssica Herzog (2016): Nomenclatural changes and lectotype designations in the seed-beetle genus Sennius Bridwell: with the synonymization of Megasennius Whitehead & Kingsolver (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae). Zootaxa 4175 (3): 249-260, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4175.3.4
C421D67B7E13FFB35ACAFADDBD7AF8F3.text	C421D67B7E13FFB35ACAFADDBD7AF8F3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Sennius notatopygus (Pic 1930) Pic 1930	<div><p>Sennius notatopygus (Pic, 1930), comb n.</p><p>Bruchus notatopygus Pic, 1930b 14 (description, distribution).</p><p>Acanthoscelides notatopygus: Blackwelder, 1946: 760 (combination, catalog); Udayagiri &amp; Wadhi, 1989: 54 (catalog).</p><p>Type material (1, MNHN): Syntype with labels: “Corumba / Matt Grosso” “ type ” “ notatopygus / n sp” “G118” “ Holotype ” “ Bruchus / notatopygus / Pic / det. 71 / J. M. Kingsolver” “ ♀ ” “Museum Paris / Coll. M. Pic” “ Sennius notatopygus / (Pic, 1930) / det J.H. Viana 2014” “ Syntype / Bruchus notatopygus Pic, 1930 / J. H. Viana”.</p><p>Remark. Pic (1930) did not mention how many specimens he studied when described Bruchus notatopygus . A female specimen was received from MNHN with labels and locality data identical to the information given in the original description (Brésil) and Pic’s handwritten label " type " and " notatopygus Pic "; here this specimen is considered as syntype . This species is here treated as Sennius notatopygus (NEW COMBINATION) due to the hind femur with one tooth at inner ventral margin and internal sac of male genitalia with hinge sclerites, this last character studied from a compared male specimen from DZUP.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C421D67B7E13FFB35ACAFADDBD7AF8F3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Viana, Jéssica Herzog	Viana, Jéssica Herzog (2016): Nomenclatural changes and lectotype designations in the seed-beetle genus Sennius Bridwell: with the synonymization of Megasennius Whitehead & Kingsolver (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae). Zootaxa 4175 (3): 249-260, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4175.3.4
C421D67B7E13FFB05ACAF8E4BB02FE0F.text	C421D67B7E13FFB05ACAF8E4BB02FE0F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Sennius reductus (Pic 1930) Pic 1930	<div><p>Sennius reductus (Pic, 1930), comb n.</p><p>Bruchus reductus Pic, 1930b 11 (description, distribution).</p><p>Acanthoscelides reductus: Blackwelder, 1946: 761 (combination, catalog); Udayagiri &amp; Wadhi, 1989: 61 (catalog).</p><p>Type material (1, MNHN): Lectotype male with labels: “Pery Pery / (Bresil)” “ type ” “ reductus / n sp” “ Holotype ” “ Holotype ♂ / Bruchus / reductus / Pic” “ Sennius / reductus / (Pic) / det. 78 / J. M. Kingsolver” “Museum Paris / Coll. M. Pic” “ Sennius reductus / (Pic, 1930) / det J.H. Viana 2014” “ Lectotype / Bruchus reductus Pic, 1930 / design. J. H. Viana”.</p><p>Remarks. The specimen received from MNHN has Pic’s handwritten label " type " and " reductus n sp" and the locality is the same as quoted in the original description (Brésil). Although Kingsolver has attached a label of holotype, Pic (1930) does not indicate the number of specimens studied and the specimen is designated as lectotype . This species is here treated as Sennius reductus (NEW COMBINATION) due mainly by the characters hind femur with one tooth at inner ventral margin and internal sac of male genitalia with hinge sclerites.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C421D67B7E13FFB05ACAF8E4BB02FE0F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Viana, Jéssica Herzog	Viana, Jéssica Herzog (2016): Nomenclatural changes and lectotype designations in the seed-beetle genus Sennius Bridwell: with the synonymization of Megasennius Whitehead & Kingsolver (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae). Zootaxa 4175 (3): 249-260, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4175.3.4
C421D67B7E10FFB05ACAFDB5BF51FAC1.text	C421D67B7E10FFB05ACAFDB5BF51FAC1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Sennius rufopygus (Pic 1930) Pic 1930	<div><p>Sennius rufopygus (Pic, 1930), stat. n. comb n.</p><p>Bruchus carneofasciatus var. rufopygus Pic, 1930b 11 (description, distribution). Acanthoscelides carneofasciatus var. rufopygus: Blackwelder, 1946: 759 (combination, catalog); Udayagiri &amp; Wadhi, 1989: 41 (catalog).</p><p>Type material (1, MNHN). Lectotype male with labels: “ Bruchus / alticola / Mexi&lt;illegible letters&gt;” “ alticola ? / &lt;illegible letters&gt; / var. a &lt;illegible letters&gt; / &lt;illegible letters&gt; pygid. / et une bomde / &lt;illegible letters&gt; / &lt;illegible letters&gt; ” “ v. rufopygus / Pic” “Holotype” “ carneofasciatus / var. rufopygus / Pic / det. 70 / J. M. Kingsolver” “ Sennius rufopygus / (Pic, 1930) / det. J.H. Viana 2014” “Lectotype / Bruchus carneofasciatus / v. rufopygus / Pic, 1930 / design. J. H. Viana”</p><p>Remarks. One specimen was received from the MNHN with two of Pic’s conflicting handwritten labels “ Bruchus / alticola / Mexi &lt;illegible letters&gt;” and " v. rufopygus / Pic ", added bellow to the second extensive label. However, I concluded that this second label, “ alticola ? / &lt;illegible letters&gt; / var. a &lt;illegible letters&gt; / &lt;illegible letters&gt; pygid. / et une bomde / &lt;illegible letters&gt; / &lt;illegible letters&gt;”, show the doubts about the identification as Sennius alticola (Sharp 1885), followed by the label identifying as " v. rufopygus / Pic ". Since the locality on the label ( Mexi) is similar to the data given in the original description (Mexique) of Bruchus carneofasciatus var. rufopygus and the Pic’s handwritten label " v. rufopygus / Pic ", here this specimen is designated as lectotype . The examination of the Bruchus carneofasciatus v. rufopygus lectotype showed that it is a separate species from Bruchus carneofasciatus (junior synonym of Sennius transversesignatus). Therefore, Bruchus carneofasciatus v. rufopygus (Pic, 1930) is here proposed as Sennius rufopygus (Pic, 1930) (NEW STATUS and NEW COMBINATION).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C421D67B7E10FFB05ACAFDB5BF51FAC1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Viana, Jéssica Herzog	Viana, Jéssica Herzog (2016): Nomenclatural changes and lectotype designations in the seed-beetle genus Sennius Bridwell: with the synonymization of Megasennius Whitehead & Kingsolver (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae). Zootaxa 4175 (3): 249-260, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4175.3.4
C421D67B7E10FFB15ACAFAE3BF6DFDE3.text	C421D67B7E10FFB15ACAFAE3BF6DFDE3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Sennius subdiversicolor (Pic 1931) Pic 1931	<div><p>Sennius subdiversicolor (Pic, 1931)</p><p>Bruchus subdiversicolor Pic, 1931b: 35 (description, distribution); Bondar, 1937: 39 (diagonsis, host, oviposition guild); Zacher, 1952: 463 (host).</p><p>Acanthoscelides subdiversicolor: Blackwelder, 1946: 761 (combination, catalog).</p><p>Sennius subdiversicolor: Johnson &amp; Kingsolver, 1973: 64 (combination, citation); Udayagiri &amp; Wadhi, 1989:107 (catalog); Kingsolver &amp; Silva, 1991: 413 (list); Silva et al. 2003: 269 (citation).</p><p>Bruchus subdiversicolor var. innigripes Pic, 1931c: 35 (description, distribution). New Synonymy</p><p>Acanthoscelides subdiversicolor var. innigripes: Blackwelder, 1946: 761 (combination, catalog); Udayagiri &amp; Wadhi, 1989: 107 (catalog).</p><p>Type materials (3, MNHN): Bruchus subdiversicolor: Lectotype male with labels: “ Brazil / Bahia / 1930 / Dr. G. Bondar / In pods of / Caesalpinia / 1635” “ type ” “ subdiversicolor n sp. " “G119” “ Holotype ” “ Bruchus / subdiversicolor / Pic / det. 71 / J.M. Kingsolver” “ ♂ ” “ Sennius / subdiversicolor / (Pic, 1931) / J. H. Viana det. 2013” “ Lectotype / Bruchus / subdiversicolor / Pic, 1931 / design. J. H. Viana”.</p><p>Bruchus subdiversicolor var. innigripes: Lectotype male with labels: “ Brazil / Bahia / 1930 / Dr. G. Bondar / In pods of / Caesalpinia / 1635” “ Para / Lectotype / Bruchus subdiversicolor v. innigripes / Pic / By JMK71” “v innigripes / &lt;illegible letters&gt;” “ex British / museum” “ Bruchus / subdiversicolor / v. innigripes / Pic / det. J.M.Kingsolver ” “ Lectotype / Bruchus subdiversicolor var. innigripes Pic, 1931 / design. J. H. Viana ” ; Paralectotype with labels: “ Brazil / Bahia / 1930 / Dr. G. Bondar / In pods of / Caesalpinia / 1635” “ Para / type ” “ Bruchus / subdiversicolor / Pic / det. J.M.Kingsolver " “ Paralectotype / Bruchus subdiversicolor var. innigripes Pic, 1931 / J. H. Viana ”.</p><p>Remarks: Bruchus subdiversicolor: In the original description, Pic (1931b) does not indicate the number of specimens studied. The labels of the received specimen are identical and consistent with the locality data given in the original description (Brazil). One specimen with Pic’s handwritten labels: "type" and “ subdiversicolor n sp. ", is here designed as the lectotype of Bruchus subdiversicolor .</p><p>Bruchus subdiversicolor v. innigripes: In the original description, Pic (1931c) does not indicate the number of specimens studied. Two specimens were received, both with labels identical and consistent with the locality data given in the original description (Brazil), but only one with Pic’s labels “ v. innigripes / &lt;illegible letters&gt;, designed as lectotype. Here the variety B. subdiversicolor v. innigripes (NEW SYNONYM) is synonymized with Bruchus subdiversicolor .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C421D67B7E10FFB15ACAFAE3BF6DFDE3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Viana, Jéssica Herzog	Viana, Jéssica Herzog (2016): Nomenclatural changes and lectotype designations in the seed-beetle genus Sennius Bridwell: with the synonymization of Megasennius Whitehead & Kingsolver (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae). Zootaxa 4175 (3): 249-260, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4175.3.4
C421D67B7E11FFBE5ACAFD1EBC5CFF27.text	C421D67B7E11FFBE5ACAFD1EBC5CFF27.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Sennius transversesignatus (Fåhraeus 1839) Fahraeus 1839	<div><p>Sennius transversesignatus (Fåhraeus, 1839), comb n.</p><p>Bruchus transversesignatus Fåhraeus, 1839: 26 (description, distribution); Gemminger &amp; Harold, 1873: 3231 (catalog, distribution); Costa Lima, 1923: 182 (host); Zacher, 1952: 463, 472 (citation, host).</p><p>Acanthoscelides transversesignatus: Blackwelder, 1946: 761 (combination, catalog); Silva et al., 1968: 375 (catalog, host, distribution); Udayagiri &amp; Wadhi, 1989: 66 (catalog).</p><p>Sennius transversesignatus: Ribeiro-Costa &amp; Reynaud, 1998: 251 (citation); Nogueira &amp; Vaz de Arruda, 2006: 46 (citation); Viana &amp; Ribeiro-Costa, 2013a: 21, 23 (citation); Viana &amp; Ribeiro-Costa, 2013b: 527 –529 (redescription, distribution, type, host, figures).</p><p>Bruchus carneofasciatus Pic, 1927b 34 (description, distribution); Pic, 1929b: 36 (citation); Bondar, 1937: 39 (diagnosis, host, oviposition guild); Pic, 1938: 25 (citation); Zacher, 1952: 461 (host). New Synonymy.</p><p>Acanthoscelides carneofasciatus: Blackwelder, 1946: 759 (combination, catalog); Wilcox, 1975: 5 (catalog); Johnson &amp; Kingsolver, 1981: 414 (catalog); Udayagiri &amp; Wadhi, 1989: 41 (catalog).</p><p>Sennius carneofasciatus: Kingsolver &amp; Silva, 1991: 413 (combination, citation); Romero-Nápoles &amp; Johnson, 2004: 627 (distribution).</p><p>Bruchus carneofasciatus var. subapicalis Pic, 1930b 11 (description, distribution) New Synonymy.</p><p>Acanthoscelides carneofasciatus var. subapicalis: Blackwelder, 1946: 759 (combination, catalog); Udayagiri &amp; Wadhi, 1989: 41 (catalog).</p><p>Type materials (4, NHRS and MNHN): Bruchus transversesignatus: Syntype female deposited in NHRS with labels: 1, “ Typus ” “In Semin. / Cassiae Bras. [Brasiliae] / Faldermann” “ Syntype / Sennius transversesignatus / (Fåhraeus, 1839) / Desig. Viana &amp; Ribeiro-Costa, 2012”.</p><p>Bruchus carneofasciatus: Syntype deposited in MHNH with labels: “Jatahy / Goyaz” “ type ” “ carneofasciatus / n sp” “ Holotype ” “ carneofasciatus / Pic / det 70 / J. M. Kingsolver” “Museum Paris / Coll. M. Pic” “ Sennius transversesignatus / (Fåhraeus, 1839) / det J.H. Viana 2014” “ Syntype / Bruchus carneofasciatus Pic, 1927 / J. H. Viana”.</p><p>Bruchus carneofasciatus var. subapicalis: Two syntypes deposited in MHNH with labels: 1, “Corumba / Matt. Grosso” “ v. subapicalis / Pic” “ Holotype ” “ carneofasciatus / var. subapicalis / Pic / det / J. M. Kingsolver” “Museum Paris / Coll. M. Pic” “ Syntype / Bruchus carneofasciatus var. subapicalis Pic, 1930 / design. J. H. Viana”; and 1, “Corumba / Matt. Grosso” “ Bruchus carneofasciatus / Pic [...] var” “Museum Paris / Coll. M. Pic” “ Syntype / Bruchus carneofasciatus var. subapicalis Pic, 1930 / J. H. Viana”.</p><p>Remarks: The recognition of Bruchus transversesignatus was based on a female syntype already studied (Viana &amp; Ribeiro-Costa 2013b). This species was treated as Sennius in previous papers, however no formal transference from Acanthoscelides to this genus was found. Therefore, Sennius transversesignatus (NEW COMBINATION) is formally proposed here, due mainly to the characters of the hind femur with one tooth at inner ventral margin and the internal sac of male genitalia with hinge sclerites, this last character studied from a compared male specimen deposited at DZUP.</p><p>Here is also synonymized Bruchus carneofasciatus (NEW SYNONYM) and the variety B. carneofasciatus v. apicalis (NEW SYNONYM) with Bruchus transversesignatus . In the original description, Pic does not indicate the number of specimens studied. The labels of the specimens are identical and consistent with locality data given in the original description (Brézil). One female specimen with Pic’s handwritten labels: " type " and “ carneofasciatus n sp. ", is here considered as syntype for Bruchus carneofasciatus . However only one specimen of B. carneofasciatus v. subapicalis have Pic’s label “ v. subapicalis / Pic”, both females received from the same locality label are here considered syntypes .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C421D67B7E11FFBE5ACAFD1EBC5CFF27	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Viana, Jéssica Herzog	Viana, Jéssica Herzog (2016): Nomenclatural changes and lectotype designations in the seed-beetle genus Sennius Bridwell: with the synonymization of Megasennius Whitehead & Kingsolver (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae). Zootaxa 4175 (3): 249-260, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4175.3.4
C421D67B7E1EFFBE5ACAFEDDBF01FBB1.text	C421D67B7E1EFFBE5ACAFEDDBF01FBB1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Sennius trinotaticollis (Pic 1930) Pic 1930	<div><p>Sennius trinotaticollis (Pic, 1930)</p><p>Bruchus trinotaticollis Pic, 1930b: 11 (description, distribution).</p><p>Acanthoscelides trinotaticollis: Blackwelder, 1946: 761 (combination, catalog).</p><p>Sennius trinotaticollis: Johnson &amp; Kingsolver, 1973: 96 (combination, description, key, figures, type designation, taxonomy, distribution); Johnson, 1977: 131 (distribution, host); Johnson, 1980: 28 (ecology); Johnson &amp; Kingsolver, 1981: 419 (catalog, distribution); Johnson, 1984: 64 (distribution, host); Udayagiri &amp; Wadhi, 1989: 107 (catalog); Romero-Nápoles &amp; Johnson, 2004: 627 (list); Pikart et al., 2011: 378, 379 (distribution, host); Viana &amp; Ribeiro-Costa, 2013b: 529 –530 (redescription, distribution, type, host, figures); Pérez et al. 2013: 76 –77 (host, key, diagnosis, host, distribution).</p><p>Bruchus diversicollis Pic, 1930b 14 (description, distribution) New Synonymy.</p><p>Acanthoscelides diversicollis: Blackwelder, 1946: 759 (combination, catalog); Udayagiri &amp; Wadhi, 1989: 45 (catalog).</p><p>Type materials (2, MNHN): Bruchus trinotatocollis: Not studied, deposited in MNHN with locality Costa Rica. Bruchus diversicollis: Lectotype male with labels: “Cayenne” “n sp”, “ type ” “ Holotype ” “ diversicollis n sp” “G118” “ Bruchus diversicollis / Pic / det / J. M. Kingsover ” “ Sennius trinotaticollis / (Pic, 1930) / det J.H. Viana 2014” “ Lectotype / Bruchus diversicollis Pic, 1930 / design. J. H. Viana ”.</p><p>Remarks. The recognition of Sennius trinotaticollis was based on Viana &amp; Ribeiro-Costa (2013b), and the homotype determined by J. M. Kingsolver in 1971 deposited at MNHN.</p><p>Bruchus diversicollis (NEW SYNONYM) is here synonomized with Bruchus trinotaticollis . Both names were proposed by Pic in the same work, so I prioritize Bruchus trinotaticollis since this name is more common in literature (Principle of the First Reviser, article 24.2 of the ICZN 1999). In the original description, Pic does not indicate the number of specimens studied, however one specimen was received from MNHN with location data identical to what is given in the original description, Cayenne. This specimen is here considered as a lectotype of B. diversicollis .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C421D67B7E1EFFBE5ACAFEDDBF01FBB1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Viana, Jéssica Herzog	Viana, Jéssica Herzog (2016): Nomenclatural changes and lectotype designations in the seed-beetle genus Sennius Bridwell: with the synonymization of Megasennius Whitehead & Kingsolver (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae). Zootaxa 4175 (3): 249-260, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4175.3.4
C421D67B7E1EFFBE5ACAFB53BD82F989.text	C421D67B7E1EFFBE5ACAFB53BD82F989.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Sennius ventralis (Fåhraeus 1839) Fahraeus 1839	<div><p>Sennius ventralis (Fåhraeus, 1839), comb n.</p><p>Bruchus ventralis Fåhraeus, 1839: 92 (description, distribution); Jekel, 1855: 17 (citation); Gemminger &amp; Harold, 1855: 3232 (catalog); Pic, 1913: 55 (distribution, catalog).</p><p>Acanthoscelides ventralis: Blackwelder, 1946: 761 (combination, catalog); Udayagiri &amp; Wadhi, 1989: 67 (catalog).</p><p>Type material (1, NHRS): Type male studied by Kingsolver, deposited at NHRS with labels: “ typus ” “Brasilia / Falderm.” “31 / 78” “ Sennius / ventralis / (Fahr.) / det. / J.M. Kingsolver / 80”.</p><p>Remarks. The recognition of Bruchus ventralis was based on personal notes by John M. Kingsolver on this type specimen and a male homotype deposited at USNM and identified by J. M. Kingsolver in 1979. Here, Sennius ventralis (NEW COMBINATION) is formally proposed due mainly to the hind femur with one tooth at inner ventral margin, and internal sac of male genitalia with hinge sclerites.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C421D67B7E1EFFBE5ACAFB53BD82F989	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Viana, Jéssica Herzog	Viana, Jéssica Herzog (2016): Nomenclatural changes and lectotype designations in the seed-beetle genus Sennius Bridwell: with the synonymization of Megasennius Whitehead & Kingsolver (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae). Zootaxa 4175 (3): 249-260, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4175.3.4
