identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
B45C87B0A008B210F325FF59FCE4F8E5.text	B45C87B0A008B210F325FF59FCE4F8E5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Mangifera altissima Blanco, Fl. Filip.	<div><p>Mangifera altissima Blanco, Fl. Filip. 181. 1837.</p><p>Neotype (first-step designated by Merrill, 1918; second-step designated by Kostermans &amp; Bompard, 1993): PHILIPPINES, “Illustrative specimen from Angat, Rizal Province, Luzon, December, 1914 (Merrill: Species Blancoanae No. 831)” (L [L0686906 digital image!]; isoneo A [A00049055 digital image!], CAL [CAL0000033690!], GH [GH00443918 digital image!], K [K001327111 digital image!], NY [NY00050782 digital image!], P [P02440608 digital image!], US [US 00432690 digital image!]). Epitype (designated here): PHILIPPINES, Province of Rizal, Luzon, Jan.- March, 1905, Ahern’s collector 2442 (CAL [CAL0000033689!]). Fig. 1 Notes: Blanco (1837) described Mangifera altissima and no materials of his collections survived (Merrill, 1918). Later, Merrill (1918) published “Species Blancoanae” and cited “Illustrative specimen from Angat, Rizal Province, Luzon, December, 1914 (Merrill: Species Blancoanae No. 831)” for Mangifera altissima . Merrill (1918, p. 36) also noted in the introductory chapter “specimens that to a large degree would take the place of Blanco’s ‘types’ which were never preserved”. The indication of ‘types’ denotes that he treated an “Illustrative specimen” as the equivalent of a neotype. Therefore, Merrill inadvertently designated “ Species Blancoanae No. 831 ” as first-step neotype because specifying a herbarium was not necessary for type designation before 1990 under Art. 9.22 (Turland et al., 2018). Hou (1978b) mentioned the type in two herbaria (BO, L) and although before 1990 there was no need to mention any herbarium or more than one herbaria before 1990 as per Art. 9.22 (Turland et al., 2018). Hou’s designation still cannot be accepted as an effective second-step neotypification as per Art. 9.17 (Turland et al., 2018) wherein citation of a single herbarium is compulsory. Later, Kostermans and Bompard (1993) cited “Mt Angat, Dec, fl, Merrill Spec. Blanco 831 (BO, K, L-holo, P)” and the citation of “L-holo” can be considered as effective second-step neotypification under Art. 9.17 (Turland et al., 2018). We could trace specimens at A, CAL, GH, K, L, NY, P and US. There are no specimens extant at BO (pers. comm., Drs Retnowati &amp; Arifiani). The second-step neotype specimen and all original materials are devoid of any flowers and fruits. As sterile specimens cannot help in the precise application of the name, therefore, we designate the flowering specimen CAL0000033689 as an epitype as per provisions of Art. 9.9 (Turland et al., 2018), because this specimen is bearing inflorescences and is collected from the same province (‘Province of Rizal, Luzon’) from where the neotype specimen was collected by Merrill.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B45C87B0A008B210F325FF59FCE4F8E5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	A., Kumar;Chakrabarty, T.	A., Kumar, Chakrabarty, T. (2021): Typification of two names in Mangifera (Anacardiaceae). Rheedea 31 (2): 92-95, DOI: 10.22244/rheedea.2021.31.02.11, URL: https://doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2021.31.02.11
B45C87B0A008B213F1B5F8E1FC77FB48.text	B45C87B0A008B213F1B5F8E1FC77FB48.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Mangifera andamanica King, J. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, Pt.	<div><p>Mangifera andamanica King, J. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, Pt. 2, Nat. Hist. 65(3): 470. 1896. Lectotype</p><p>(designated here): INDIA, Andaman &amp; Nicobar Islands, Andamans, 1884, Dr. King’s collector s.n. (CAL [CAL0000024405!]; isolecto BM [BM000884747 digital image!], CAL [CAL0000024412!, CAL0000024413!], K [K000695011 digital image!], P [P02440609 digital image!]). Syntypes: INDIA, Andaman &amp; Nicobar Islands, South Andaman Island, Hobdaypur, Hill jungle, 25.04.1891, Dr. King s.n. (CAL [CAL0000026152!, CAL0000026153!], K [K000695010 digital image!]). Fig. 2</p><p>Notes: The protologue cites “Andaman Islands: King’s collectors” (King, 1896). Kostermans and Bompard (1993) designated King’s collector 39 (CAL) as lectotype and cited “Lecto-typus: Mt Harriett, June, fl., King’s Coll. 39 (CAL)”. After a thorough search of CAL, we could not trace flowering specimen (‘June’) of King’s collector 39 from Mount Harriet. We could trace five specimens at CAL of M. andamanica of which three from the Andamans were without precise locality and two specimens were collected from Hobdaypur, South Andaman Island. In addition, there were two specimens found at K of which one (K000695011, digital image!) is without precise locality and the second is from Hobdaypur (K000695010, digital image!). Moreover, no collection number is mentioned on any cited specimens. Therefore, a new lectotype designation is needed in the absence of the previously designated lectotype King’s collector 39 from Mount Harriet. Moreover, all three specimens from Hobdaypur were collected by Dr. King himself in fruiting and the remaining specimens without precise locality were collected in flowering by Dr. King’s collector. The best preserved flowering specimen CAL0000024405 is designated here as lectotype because the species is recognized by flowering material with 4-merous flowers and well develop disc (Kostermans &amp; Bompard, 1993).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B45C87B0A008B213F1B5F8E1FC77FB48	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	A., Kumar;Chakrabarty, T.	A., Kumar, Chakrabarty, T. (2021): Typification of two names in Mangifera (Anacardiaceae). Rheedea 31 (2): 92-95, DOI: 10.22244/rheedea.2021.31.02.11, URL: https://doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2021.31.02.11
