taxonID	type	description	language	source
AF3D23072445FFA051A0FC82FBF3F944.taxon	description	1) Laricioxylon nogradense GREGUSS, 1967 Pl. 1, Figs 1, 2 M a t e r i a l. Holotype HNHM-PBO 2008.201. 2. (= 2 slides: tr + rd). D e s c r i p t i o n. See Greguss (1967: 97, pl. LXXXVI, figs 1 – 6, legend p. 136). N o t e s. These re-discovered slides can be considered as the holotype of Laricioxylon nogradense, which is the type species of the fossil genus Laricioxylon (for discussion see Philippe et al. 1999). The tangential longitudinal section, however, is missing. Concerning the affinity to Larix, we did not observe the typical abrupt transition from earlywood to latewood (see in IAWA Committee 2004: feature 42), which is probably obscured by wood deformation (Pl. 1, Fig. 1). Resin canals seem to be traumatic and present in latewood in tangential bands (Pl. 1, Fig. 1, arrows). In the radial section, we observed neither bordered pits in radial tracheid walls nor cross-field pits, but the bordered pits in ray tracheids (Pl. 1, Fig. 2, arrow), which appear to have wide apertures and rounded pit borders (see in IAWA Committee 2004: fig. 45), are rather typical for Larix.	en	Sakala, Jakub, Selmeczi, Ildikó, Hably, Lilla (2018): Reappraisal Of Greguss’ Fossil Wood Types And Figured Specimens From The Cenozoic Of Hungary: Overview, Corrected Geology And Systematical Notes. Fossil Imprint 74 (1 - 2): 101-114, DOI: 10.2478/if-2018-0008, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0008
AF3D23072445FFA251EDF918FD55F7FC.taxon	description	M a t e r i a l. Holotype HNHM-PBO 2008.160. 3. (= 3 slides: tr + tg + rd). D e s c r i p t i o n. See Greguss (1967: 99, pl. LXXX, figs 1 – 7, legend p. 135). Badenian 5 No. )) 5 No. Pannonian or Karpatian Karpatian? or Karpatian or? Ottnangian) to lowermost Danube Terrace Danube Terrace?? to or (( Badenian Sarmatian Pannonian Sarmatian Sarmatian Ottnangian Pleistocene Pleistocene Sarmatian Ottnangian Ottnangian Karpatian Karpatian (Sarmatian Ottnangian Ottnangian Pleistocene Pleistocene )) Helvetian Helvetian Tortonian Lower Sarmatian Helvetian Sarmatian-Pannonian Sarmatian Helvetian Pleistocene Pannonian Sarmatian Lower Helvetian Helvetian Lower Helvetian Helvetian Lower Sarmatian Helvetian Lower) Lower (Helvetian revoked (Pleistocene Pleistocene (revoked side part. pit pit, Hill w. Vilma Ólombérc, gravel pit w Ördögárok Alsó Mátyásföld pit gravel Sashegy, gravel Sashegy, Szurdokpüspöki Nógrádszakál Szigliget ,, Pásztó Sály, Medveárok Mónosbél Cegléd Pestlőrinc, Buják Parádfürdő, Nemti Piliny Budapest, Mikófalva Mátranovák gravel, Ajka, Pestlőrinc Pestlőrinc,) rd / )) tg) ))))))) rd rd) 2 * rd /)) rd rd rd rd rd rd rd + + rd + tg) rd) tg + + + + +) + + tg tg + rd) + tg + tg 2 * tg tg tg tg tg tg tg tg * 2 2 * tg * 2 tg tg + tg * 2 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + rd + + * tr tr tr tr tr tr tr tr tr tr tr tr tr tr tr 2 tr tr (((((((((((((((((( 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 4 4 3 5 2 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1. ..... A 144 31. N 61.852 1903 N 119. A. 1014 61.919 61.920 A 485. 61.939 206. A 61.925 202 A. II IV) holotype) hungaricum yatsenko-khmelevskyi (Ulmus scabra (cf.). arpinifolia c. holotype () suberoides.. (sp No 1) No.) 2 sp). (. 3 No ilex Quercus sp (.) pannonicum pannonicum cf. holotype pilinyense () holotype budense (Populus tremula. sp). cf (matrense lectotype () citronelloides. cf Fraxinus excelsior cf. excelsior Fraxinus cf. Albizzioxylon Zelkovoxylon sp Ulmoxylon cf Ulmoxylon Quercoxylon Quercoxylon Quercus (. sp Quercoxylon Quercoxylon Pterocaryoxylon Pterocaryoxylon Pterocaryoxylon Eucaryoxylon Populoxylon Meliaceoxylon Icacinoxylon Fraxinoxylon Fraxinoxylon ... ............... 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 4 4 3 5 2 3 3 3 3 ......... .. .... ... 2008.249 2008.204 2008.242 2008.208 2008.232 2008.194 2008.123 2008.216 2008.120 2008.207 2008.198 2008.222 2008.115 2008.191 2008.188 2008.104 2008.212 2008.214. continued Fabaceae Ulmaceae Ulmaceae Ulmaceae Fagaceae Fagaceae Fagaceae Fagaceae Fagaceae Juglandaceae Juglandaceae Juglandaceae Juglandaceae Salicaceae Meliaceae Icacinaceae Oleaceae Oleaceae. 1 Table 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54	en	Sakala, Jakub, Selmeczi, Ildikó, Hably, Lilla (2018): Reappraisal Of Greguss’ Fossil Wood Types And Figured Specimens From The Cenozoic Of Hungary: Overview, Corrected Geology And Systematical Notes. Fossil Imprint 74 (1 - 2): 101-114, DOI: 10.2478/if-2018-0008, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0008
AF3D23072447FFA251C2FF31FB51FF22.taxon	description	(not validly published)	en	Sakala, Jakub, Selmeczi, Ildikó, Hably, Lilla (2018): Reappraisal Of Greguss’ Fossil Wood Types And Figured Specimens From The Cenozoic Of Hungary: Overview, Corrected Geology And Systematical Notes. Fossil Imprint 74 (1 - 2): 101-114, DOI: 10.2478/if-2018-0008, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0008
AF3D23072447FFA2510FFCC1FA01FA00.taxon	description	Pl. 1, Figs 3, 4 M a t e r i a l. Lectotype defined here HNHM-PBO 2008.240.3. (= 3 slides: tr + tg + rd). D e s c r i p t i o n. See Greguss (1967: 61, pl. LIV, figs 1 – 6, legend p. 128). N o t e s. The similar wood anatomy, but different original number from that used by Greguss (1967: 62), i. e. A. 538 vs. A. 65, show that the holotype is missing and we need to define here this fossil as a lectotype of Cupressinoxylon cupressoides GREGUSS. However, C. cupressoides P. GREGUSS is considered as a later homonym of Cupressinoxylon cupressoides KRÄUSEL (Kräusel 1920: 429) and must be considered as “ illegitimate ”. Finally, any affinity to Cupressus itself remains questionable as the fossil has biseriate bordered pits with bars of Sanio (Pl. 1, Fig. 3) and taxodioid cross-field pits (Pl. 1, Fig. 4, arrows), both typical of Taxodioxylon (e. g. Teodoridis and Sakala 2008).	en	Sakala, Jakub, Selmeczi, Ildikó, Hably, Lilla (2018): Reappraisal Of Greguss’ Fossil Wood Types And Figured Specimens From The Cenozoic Of Hungary: Overview, Corrected Geology And Systematical Notes. Fossil Imprint 74 (1 - 2): 101-114, DOI: 10.2478/if-2018-0008, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0008
AF3D23072440FFA451B7FB87FDA6FEF3.taxon	description	14) Laurinoxylon daberi GREGUSS, 1969 Pl. 1, Figs 7 – 9 M a t e r i a l. Holotype HNHM-PBO 2008.158. 4. (= 4 slides: tr + tg + 2 * rd). D e s c r i p t i o n. See Greguss (1969: 34, pl. XVII, figs 1 – 11, legend p. 134). N o t e s. As Greguss (1969) noticed, there is a large amount of diffuse axial parenchyma, seen in cross-section as white dots within a brown matrix substance (Pl. 1, Fig. 7), idioblasts are both in rays (Pl. 1, Fig. 9, arrows) and axial parenchyma (Pl. 1, Fig. 8., upper arrow) with the former not as pronounced. Following the new classification by Mantzouka et al. (2016), this species belongs to Laurinoxylon Type 2 a. There are also numerous crystals, mainly associated with axial parenchyma (Pl. 1, Fig. 8, lower arrow). 15) Laurinoxylon sussi GREGUSS, 1969 Pl. 1, Fig. 10 M a t e r i a l. Holotype HNHM-PBO 2008.243. 3. (= 3 slides: tr + tg + rd). D e s c r i p t i o n. See Greguss (1969: 35, pl. XVIII, figs 1 – 7, legend p. 135). N o t e s. The wood is diffuse-porous with vessels solitary, in radial multiples or clusters with vasicentric parenchyma and 2 – 3 - seriate heterocellular rays with conspicuous marginal oil / mucilage cells. These idioblasts are very prominent and seem to be located in the margins of rays only (Pl. 1, Fig. 10), therefore this is a Laurinoxylon Type 1 sensu Mantzouka et al. (2016).	en	Sakala, Jakub, Selmeczi, Ildikó, Hably, Lilla (2018): Reappraisal Of Greguss’ Fossil Wood Types And Figured Specimens From The Cenozoic Of Hungary: Overview, Corrected Geology And Systematical Notes. Fossil Imprint 74 (1 - 2): 101-114, DOI: 10.2478/if-2018-0008, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0008
AF3D23072440FFA552ECF91BFD82F7ED.taxon	description	M a t e r i a l. Figured specimen HNHM-PBO 2008.105.3. (= 3 slides: tr + tg + rd). D e s c r i p t i o n. See Greguss (1967: 76, pl. LV, figs 1, 2, 5 – 7, legend p. 129). N o t e s. Sequoioxylon GREGUSS (Greguss 1955 b) is not validly published (for more details see Philippe et al. 1999 and Farr and Zijlstra in Index Nominum Genericorum (Plantarum) – http: // botany. si. edu / ing /).	en	Sakala, Jakub, Selmeczi, Ildikó, Hably, Lilla (2018): Reappraisal Of Greguss’ Fossil Wood Types And Figured Specimens From The Cenozoic Of Hungary: Overview, Corrected Geology And Systematical Notes. Fossil Imprint 74 (1 - 2): 101-114, DOI: 10.2478/if-2018-0008, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0008
AF3D23072440FFA55133FF60FB00FEC2.taxon	description	M a t e r i a l. Figured specimen HNHM-PBO 2008.176.2. (= 2 slides: tg + rd).	en	Sakala, Jakub, Selmeczi, Ildikó, Hably, Lilla (2018): Reappraisal Of Greguss’ Fossil Wood Types And Figured Specimens From The Cenozoic Of Hungary: Overview, Corrected Geology And Systematical Notes. Fossil Imprint 74 (1 - 2): 101-114, DOI: 10.2478/if-2018-0008, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0008
AF3D23072440FFA55132FEB1FACBFD30.taxon	description	M a t e r i a l. Figured specimen HNHM-PBO 2008.177.3. (= 3 slides: tr + 2 * rd). D e s c r i p t i o n. See Greguss (1967: 79, pl. LXIII, figs 1 – 9, legend p. 131). N o t e s. The two specimens (nos 11 and 12 in present paper) have the same original number (A. 535) so we think the slides come from the same wood, figured in Greguss (1967: 79, pl. LXIII). Contrary to his observation, we did not observe the type of transverse end walls seen in axial parenchyma which represents an important feature.	en	Sakala, Jakub, Selmeczi, Ildikó, Hably, Lilla (2018): Reappraisal Of Greguss’ Fossil Wood Types And Figured Specimens From The Cenozoic Of Hungary: Overview, Corrected Geology And Systematical Notes. Fossil Imprint 74 (1 - 2): 101-114, DOI: 10.2478/if-2018-0008, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0008
AF3D23072441FFA452EDFA0AFEE5F968.taxon	description	M a t e r i a l. Figured specimen HNHM-PBO 2008.133.4. (= 4 slides: 2 * tr + 2 * longitudinal). D e s c r i p t i o n. See Greguss (1969: 21, pl. VI, figs 1 – 9, legend p. 132).	en	Sakala, Jakub, Selmeczi, Ildikó, Hably, Lilla (2018): Reappraisal Of Greguss’ Fossil Wood Types And Figured Specimens From The Cenozoic Of Hungary: Overview, Corrected Geology And Systematical Notes. Fossil Imprint 74 (1 - 2): 101-114, DOI: 10.2478/if-2018-0008, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0008
AF3D23072442FFA75290F954FBFBFF33.taxon	description	31) Dillenioxylon mikofalvense GREGUSS, 1969 Pl. 2, Figs 1, 2 M a t e r i a l. Holotype HNHM-PBO 2008.192. 2. (= 2 slides: tr + rd). D e s c r i p t i o n. See Greguss (1969: 26, pl. XI, figs 1 – 10, legend p. 133). N o t e s. The wood is diffuse-porous with rays of 2 types: uniseriate and wide (Pl. 2, Fig. 1) and mostly solitary vessels with opposite to scalariform intervessel pits (which are similar to vessel-ray pits), scalariform perforation plates (Pl. 2, Fig. 2) and tyloses.	en	Sakala, Jakub, Selmeczi, Ildikó, Hably, Lilla (2018): Reappraisal Of Greguss’ Fossil Wood Types And Figured Specimens From The Cenozoic Of Hungary: Overview, Corrected Geology And Systematical Notes. Fossil Imprint 74 (1 - 2): 101-114, DOI: 10.2478/if-2018-0008, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0008
AF3D23072442FFA751D6FEB1FA9FF92A.taxon	description	M a t e r i a l. Holotype HNHM-PBO 2008.241. 4. (= 4 slides: 2 * tr + tg + rd). D e s c r i p t i o n. See Greguss (1969: 42, pl. XXIV, figs 1 – 9, legend p. 136). N o t e s. There are opposite vessel-ray pits, 20 – 30 bars in scalariform perforation plates (Pl. 2, Fig. 3, left), and numerous bubble-like inclusions (granules) in rays, seen in radial section (Pl. 2, Fig. 3, arrows). 33) Liquidambaroxylon kraeuselii GREGUSS, 1969 Pl. 2, Fig. 4 M a t e r i a l. Holotype HNHM-PBO 2008.202. 3. (= 3 slides: tr + tg + rd). D e s c r i p t i o n. See Greguss (1969: 44, pl. XXVI, figs 1 – 9, legend p. 136). N o t e s. Similarly to Greguss (1969), we observed the scalariform perforation plates with only about 10 bars (which is a rather low number for Liquidambar; for comparison see Sakala and Privé-Gill 2004), and heterocellular rays with long uniseriate extremities. Moreover, there are rich crystalliferous contents in chambered axial parenchyma (Pl. 2, Fig. 4, arrow) and possibly also disjunctive ray parenchyma cell walls. 34) Liquidambaroxylon maegdefraui GREGUSS, 1969 Pl. 2, Figs 5, 6 M a t e r i a l. Holotype HNHM-PBO 2008.239. 3. (= 3 slides: tr + tg + rd). D e s c r i p t i o n. See Greguss (1969: 45, pl. XXVII, figs 1 – 9, legend p. 137). N o t e s. This is a well-preserved wood with an excellent radial section showing scalariform perforation plates with almost 30 bars (Pl. 2, Fig. 5, right arrow, Pl. 2, Fig. 6). The rays are uniseriate to biseriate (Pl. 2, Fig. 5, left arrow), so different from the other species of Liquidambaroxylon. The original inventory number (No. 61.932.1.) quoted by Greguss (1969: 46) was not observed on the slides, but we consider the specimen as an original holotype.	en	Sakala, Jakub, Selmeczi, Ildikó, Hably, Lilla (2018): Reappraisal Of Greguss’ Fossil Wood Types And Figured Specimens From The Cenozoic Of Hungary: Overview, Corrected Geology And Systematical Notes. Fossil Imprint 74 (1 - 2): 101-114, DOI: 10.2478/if-2018-0008, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0008
AF3D23072442FFA752BAFD51FE3BF9A7.taxon	description	M a t e r i a l. Holotype HNHM-PBO 2008.270. 3. (= 3 slides: tr + tg + rd). D e s c r i p t i o n. See Greguss (1969: 24 (only mentioned but without description, more in Greguss 1964), pl. VII, figs 1, 2, pl. VIII, figs 3 – 10, pl. IX, figs 11 – 20, legend p. 132). N o t e s. The holotype of this homoxylous wood was rediscovered in Budapest by M. Philippe. It has up to 3 - seriate rays (Pl. 1, Fig. 15) and radial tracheid walls with scalariform to dense circular bordered pits (Pl. 1, Fig. 16). However, as reported by Philippe et al. (2010), this “ angiosperm ” wood is actually a reworked Carboniferous wood of the Pitys type (determination by J. Galtier), so very probably represents an extinct pteridosperm and not a angiosperm. However, for the purpose of this overview and its clarity, we place it here following Greguss’ original classification. Concerning the geological setting, the locality (Tokaj) was listed by Greguss as Sarmatian as the volcanics of that age occurred there. On the other hand, Palaeozoic rocks have not been recorded on the surface in the immediate vicinity. As a result, the Carboniferous age of the fossil can either be explained by the existence of Palaeozoic xenoliths (in Sarmatian volcanics), which may have contained the plant remains, or by a redeposition of Carboniferous sediments from a significant distance (e. g. surroundings of Veľká Tŕňa in Slovakia, further north).	en	Sakala, Jakub, Selmeczi, Ildikó, Hably, Lilla (2018): Reappraisal Of Greguss’ Fossil Wood Types And Figured Specimens From The Cenozoic Of Hungary: Overview, Corrected Geology And Systematical Notes. Fossil Imprint 74 (1 - 2): 101-114, DOI: 10.2478/if-2018-0008, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0008
AF3D23072442FFA65186F8E9FD75FEA3.taxon	description	35) Vitioxylon megyaszoenze GREGUSS, 1969 Pl. 2, Figs 7, 8 M a t e r i a l. Holotype HNHM-PBO 2008.189. 4. (= 4 slides: tr + tg + 2 * rd). D e s c r i p t i o n. See Greguss (1969: 58, pl. XXXVIII, figs 1 – 9, legend p. 139). N o t e s. The wood is diffuse-porous (Pl. 2, Fig. 7) with big (Pl. 2, Fig. 8, left arrow) and small (Pl. 2, Fig. 8, right arrow) vessels intermixed and extremely high rays. Such a wood type, i. e., with two vessel size classes throughout the wood, is typical of lianas (see Type 5 in Baas et al. 2004).	en	Sakala, Jakub, Selmeczi, Ildikó, Hably, Lilla (2018): Reappraisal Of Greguss’ Fossil Wood Types And Figured Specimens From The Cenozoic Of Hungary: Overview, Corrected Geology And Systematical Notes. Fossil Imprint 74 (1 - 2): 101-114, DOI: 10.2478/if-2018-0008, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0008
AF3D23072443FFA652EAFE22FE51FAA5.taxon	description	36) Albizzioxylon hungaricum GREGUSS, 1969 Pl. 2, Fig. 9 M a t e r i a l. Lectotype defined here HNHM-PBO 2008.248.3. (= 3 slides: tr + tg + rd). 37) Albizzioxylon hungaricum GREGUSS, 1969 Pl. 2, Fig. 10 M a t e r i a l. Additional specimen HNHM-PBO 2008.249.3. (= 3 slides: tr + 2 * tg). D e s c r i p t i o n. See Greguss (1969: 50, pl. XXIX, figs 1 – 9, pl. XXX, figs 10 – 18, legend p. 137). N o t e s. The wood is diffuse-porous with vessels solitary or in radial multiples (Pl. 2, Fig. 9) with tyloses (or fragmented gum deposits) and very dense small alternate pits, parenchyma aliform to confluent sometimes crystalliferous and 1 – 5 - seriate homocellular rays (Pl. 2, Fig. 10). Because the holotype A. 142 is missing, we define here the specimen HNHM-PBO 2008.248.3., with all three sections present, as the lectotype. However, it seems that Greguss, when proposing a new fossil genus, did not realise that the generic name Albizzioxylon already existed; the name was proposed already twice before his proposal (Albizzioxylon RAMANUJAM, 1960 and Albizzioxylon A. A. NIKIT. 1935; see Farr and Zijlstra in Index Nominum Genericorum (Plantarum )). As a consequence, Albizzioxylon GREGUSS is a later homonym and must be considered as “ illegitimate ”.	en	Sakala, Jakub, Selmeczi, Ildikó, Hably, Lilla (2018): Reappraisal Of Greguss’ Fossil Wood Types And Figured Specimens From The Cenozoic Of Hungary: Overview, Corrected Geology And Systematical Notes. Fossil Imprint 74 (1 - 2): 101-114, DOI: 10.2478/if-2018-0008, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0008
AF3D23072443FFA65122FE42FA11FD47.taxon	description	M a t e r i a l. Figured specimen HNHM-PBO 2008.208.3. (= 3 slides: tr + tg + rd). D e s c r i p t i o n. Ssee Greguss (1969: 86, pl. LXXVIII, figs 1 – 4, legend p. 148). N o t e s. There are homocellular rays up to 8 cells in width.	en	Sakala, Jakub, Selmeczi, Ildikó, Hably, Lilla (2018): Reappraisal Of Greguss’ Fossil Wood Types And Figured Specimens From The Cenozoic Of Hungary: Overview, Corrected Geology And Systematical Notes. Fossil Imprint 74 (1 - 2): 101-114, DOI: 10.2478/if-2018-0008, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0008
AF3D23072443FFA65287FA27FDF1F859.taxon	description	M a t e r i a l. Holotype HNHM-PBO 2008.204. 3. (= 3 slides: tr + tg + rd). D e s c r i p t i o n. See Greguss (1969: 83, pl. LXXVI, figs 1 – 9, legend p. 148). N o t e s. This is a well-preserved wood with crystals in the axial parenchyma along the rays (Pl. 2, Fig. 11, arrow) and spirals and tyloses in the vessels. Concerning the wood of Ulmaceae in general, a good overview was recently produced by Wheeler and Manchester (2007).	en	Sakala, Jakub, Selmeczi, Ildikó, Hably, Lilla (2018): Reappraisal Of Greguss’ Fossil Wood Types And Figured Specimens From The Cenozoic Of Hungary: Overview, Corrected Geology And Systematical Notes. Fossil Imprint 74 (1 - 2): 101-114, DOI: 10.2478/if-2018-0008, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0008
AF3D2307244CFFA952F9F92CFA08FEF3.taxon	description	M a t e r i a l. Holotype HNHM-PBO 2008.115. 5. (= 5 slides: tr + 2 * rd + 2 * tg / rd). D e s c r i p t i o n. See Greguss (1969: 79, pl. LXXII, figs 1, 3 – 9, legend p. 147). N o t e s. We did not observe any ring-porosity, as mentioned by Greguss (1969: 79), but only diffuse-porosity (Pl. 2, Fig. 14). However, based on the overall similarity of the description in the protologue, we consider the specimen as the holotype of Eucaryoxylon budense GREGUSS, 1969.	en	Sakala, Jakub, Selmeczi, Ildikó, Hably, Lilla (2018): Reappraisal Of Greguss’ Fossil Wood Types And Figured Specimens From The Cenozoic Of Hungary: Overview, Corrected Geology And Systematical Notes. Fossil Imprint 74 (1 - 2): 101-114, DOI: 10.2478/if-2018-0008, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0008
AF3D2307244CFFA9511DF8FAFB84F81F.taxon	description	M a t e r i a l. Figured specimen HNHM-PBO 2008.104.3. (= 3 slides: 2 * rd + tg). D e s c r i p t i o n. See Greguss (1969: 61, pl. XLI, figs 1 – 9, legend p. 140).	en	Sakala, Jakub, Selmeczi, Ildikó, Hably, Lilla (2018): Reappraisal Of Greguss’ Fossil Wood Types And Figured Specimens From The Cenozoic Of Hungary: Overview, Corrected Geology And Systematical Notes. Fossil Imprint 74 (1 - 2): 101-114, DOI: 10.2478/if-2018-0008, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0008
AF3D2307244CFFA951D8FC45FB56F95B.taxon	description	M a t e r i a l. Lectotype defined here HNHM-PBO 2008.188.3. (= 3 slides: tr + tg + tg / rd). D e s c r i p t i o n. See Greguss (1969: 89, pl. LXXX, figs 1 – 9, legend p. 149). N o t e s. This is a diffuse-porous wood with vessels in radial multiples, intercellular canals of traumatic origin, closely spaced in tangential bands (Pl. 2, Fig. 15), axial parenchyma diffuse to diffuse-in-aggregates, and paratracheal and 2 – 3 - seriate heterocellular rays. We also observed an unusual and relatively big structure that we interpret as an isolated axial canal, probably also of traumatic origin (Pl. 2, Fig. 16). Concerning the (in) validity of the fossil genus Meliaceoxylon GREGUSS (see Farr and Zijlstra in Index Nominum Genericorum), there are two type specimens indicated by Greguss (1969: 90), i. e. Nos 201 and 202. Our reinvestigation discovered that specimen No. 201 was missing, so we define here the specimen HNHM-PBO 2008.188. 3. (= A. 202) as the lectotype.	en	Sakala, Jakub, Selmeczi, Ildikó, Hably, Lilla (2018): Reappraisal Of Greguss’ Fossil Wood Types And Figured Specimens From The Cenozoic Of Hungary: Overview, Corrected Geology And Systematical Notes. Fossil Imprint 74 (1 - 2): 101-114, DOI: 10.2478/if-2018-0008, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0008
AF3D2307244CFFA952D6FE24FED3FCE5.taxon	description	M a t e r i a l. Figured specimen HNHM-PBO 2008.207.4. (= 4 slides: tr + 2 * tg + rd). D e s c r i p t i o n. See Greguss (1969: 76, pl. LXIX, figs 1 – 9, legend p. 146). N o t e s. The wood is diffuse-porous with solitary vessels or in radial multiples of 2 – 3. There are mostly 2 - seriate heterocellular rays and banded axial parenchyma full of oxalate crystals.	en	Sakala, Jakub, Selmeczi, Ildikó, Hably, Lilla (2018): Reappraisal Of Greguss’ Fossil Wood Types And Figured Specimens From The Cenozoic Of Hungary: Overview, Corrected Geology And Systematical Notes. Fossil Imprint 74 (1 - 2): 101-114, DOI: 10.2478/if-2018-0008, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0008
AF3D2307244CFFA952C5FC96FDD5F968.taxon	description	M a t e r i a l. Figured specimen HNHM-PBO 2008.198.4. (= 4 slides: tr + 2 * tg + rd). D e s c r i p t i o n. See Greguss (1969: 77, pl. LXX, figs 1 – 4, legend p. 147). N o t e s. This is a diffuse-porous wood with tangential bands of parenchyma, mostly uniseriate rays and numerous oxalate crystals in the axial parenchyma. 48) Pterocaryoxylon pilinyense GREGUSS, 1969 Pl. 2, Fig. 13 M a t e r i a l. Holotype HNHM-PBO 2008.222. 3. (= 3 slides: tr + tg + rd). D e s c r i p t i o n. See Greguss (1969: 77, pl. LXXI, figs 1 – 9, legend p. 147). N o t e s. The vessels are solitary or in multiples of 3 or more with dense intervessel pitting, axial parenchyma is present as banded, in 1 – 3 - cell wide tangential bands, and paratracheal vasicentric. Crystals are in chambered axial parenchyma, clearly seen in the radial section, with about 8 chambers per strand (Pl. 2, Fig. 13). This type is known today as Rhysocaryoxylon pilinyense (GREGUSS, 1969) DUPÉRON, 1988 (see in Sakala and Gryc 2011).	en	Sakala, Jakub, Selmeczi, Ildikó, Hably, Lilla (2018): Reappraisal Of Greguss’ Fossil Wood Types And Figured Specimens From The Cenozoic Of Hungary: Overview, Corrected Geology And Systematical Notes. Fossil Imprint 74 (1 - 2): 101-114, DOI: 10.2478/if-2018-0008, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0008
AF3D2307244DFFA852F8FF02FE54FE80.taxon	description	M a t e r i a l. Figured specimen HNHM-PBO 2008.212.3. (= 3 slides: tr + tg + rd).	en	Sakala, Jakub, Selmeczi, Ildikó, Hably, Lilla (2018): Reappraisal Of Greguss’ Fossil Wood Types And Figured Specimens From The Cenozoic Of Hungary: Overview, Corrected Geology And Systematical Notes. Fossil Imprint 74 (1 - 2): 101-114, DOI: 10.2478/if-2018-0008, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0008
AF3D2307244DFFA852F8FE73FD3DFCF6.taxon	description	M a t e r i a l. Figured specimen HNHM-PBO 2008.214.3. (= 3 slides: tr + 2 * tg). D e s c r i p t i o n. See Greguss (1969: 99, pl. XCI, fig. 4, pl. XCIII, figs 1 – 4, legend p. 151). N o t e s. Both woods show prominent tangential bands of parenchyma in late wood and vasicentric to aliform (or even confluent) paratracheal parenchyma. We believe they both represent the slides from the same tree, so we range them under “ Fraxinoxylon cf. Fraxinus excelsior L. ”. The transverse section illustrated by fig. XCIII / 1 represents the cross-section of specimen HNHM-PBO 2008.214.3.	en	Sakala, Jakub, Selmeczi, Ildikó, Hably, Lilla (2018): Reappraisal Of Greguss’ Fossil Wood Types And Figured Specimens From The Cenozoic Of Hungary: Overview, Corrected Geology And Systematical Notes. Fossil Imprint 74 (1 - 2): 101-114, DOI: 10.2478/if-2018-0008, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0008
