identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
A15B8781FFE4820CFF422E76FDB8FAE9.text	A15B8781FFE4820CFF422E76FDB8FAE9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Distylium lepidotum , Nakai 1918	<div><p>Distylium lepidotum Nakai (1918: 220)</p> <p>= D. racemosum Hattori, non Siebold &amp; Zuccarini (1908: 26), nom. nud. ≡ D. racemosum Siebold &amp; Zuccarini (1841: 179) var. lepidotum (Nakai) Hatusima (1976: 419), nom. illeg. (Art. 41.5 of the ICN) Type (lectotype, designated here):— JAPAN. Bonin: Anijima, 28 July 1905, H. Hattori s.n. (TI [01677]!). Additional specimens examined:— JAPAN. Bonin: Chichijima, Ohne-yama, 17 July 1905, H. Hattori s.n. (syntype, TI [01657]!); Bonin:</p> <p>Chichijima, Asahi-yama, 23 July 1905, H. Hattori s.n. (syntype, TI [01658]!, TI [01660]!); Bonin: Chichijima, Byobu-dani, 19 July</p> <p>1905, H. Hattori s.n. (syntype, TI [01659]!).</p> <p>Distribution:— Japan (endemic to the Bonin Islands).</p> <p>Notes:—In the protologue of Distylium lepidotum, Nakai (1918) indicated, “Hab. Bonin: insula Ani-shima (Hirotarô Hattori), insula Chichi-shima (Hirotarô Hattori).” In TI, we found one sheet from Anijima (= Ani-shima) and four sheets from Chichijima (= “Chichi-shima”), which were collected on different days of July 1905 by H. Hattori. These five are regarded as the syntypes based on Nakai’s handwriting of “ Distylium lepidotum Nakai ” on the label. Nakai (1930a) later indicated “Mt. Asahiyama insulae Chichijima (H. Toyoshima—typus florum in Herb. Imp. Univ. Tokyo).” However, this specimen (H. Toyoshima, s.n., TI [01680]), with “florum!” written on the label in Nakai’s handwriting, was collected in 1928 after publication of the protologue. This specimen seems to be regarded as a typical flowering specimen because Hattori’s five specimens are sterile. Walker (1944) cited the information in Nakai (1918) as the type without referring to the specimens, and he did not designate the lectotype. Toyoda (1981) selected the specimen (H. Hattori, 1905) in TI as the type, but this is inadequate because of the lack of specific information for identifying the lectotype. Of the five syntypes, we correctly designated the specimen from Anijima (H. Hattori s.n., 28 July 1905; TI [01677]) as the lectotype.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A15B8781FFE4820CFF422E76FDB8FAE9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Ohi-Toma, Tetsuo;Watanabe-Toma, Kana;Murata, Jin	Ohi-Toma, Tetsuo, Watanabe-Toma, Kana, Murata, Jin (2015): Typification of Angiospermae described from the Bonin Islands 2: Archichlamydeae. Phytotaxa 227 (1): 35-44, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.227.1.4, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.227.1.4
A15B8781FFE4820FFF4229B6FD26FD8F.text	A15B8781FFE4820FFF4229B6FD26FD8F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Erythrina variegata Linnaeus 1754	<div><p>Erythrina variegata Linnaeus (1754: 10)</p> <p>Type (lectotype designated by Merrill 1917: 276):—[icon] “ Gelala Alba ” in Rumphius, Herb. Amboin. 2: 234, t.77 (1741).</p> <p>= Erythrina boninensis Tuyama (1935: 373)</p> <p>Type (lectotype, designated here):— JAPAN. Bonin: Chichijima, Omura, 14 April 1934, Z. Toyosima s.n. (TI [21506]!, isolectotypes TI [21503]!, TI [21504]!, TI [21505]!).</p> <p>Additional specimens examined:— JAPAN. Bonin: Chichijima, Omura, 24 June 1932, T. Tuyama s.n. (syntype, TI [21507]!); Bonin: Hahajima, Okimura, 2 August 1905, H. Hattori s.n. (paratype, TI [02112]!); Bonin: Hahajima, Okimura, 27 June 1920, T. Nakai s.n. (paratype, TI [02110]!, TI [02111]!).</p> <p>Distribution:— Japan (the Bonin Islands and the Ryukyu Islands, indigenous or naturalized), originating in India and the Malay Peninsula.</p> <p>Notes:—In the protologue of Erythrina boninensis, Tuyama (1935) simultaneously indicated two specimens in TI as the type, “ Z. Toyosima, Apr. 14. 1934 –Typus floris” and “ T. Tuyama, Jun. 24. 1932 —Typus folii,” which are therefore syntypes (Art. 9.5 of the ICN, McNeill et al. 2012). He also cited two additional specimens without designating them as a type, so they are paratypes (see Art. 9.6 Note 5 Ex. 6 of the ICN, McNeill et al. 2012). In TI, we found four duplicates of Toyosima’s specimen with flowers, and one sheet of Tuyama’s specimen without flowers. Of them, one sheet (Z. Toyoshima, s.n., TI [21504]) was affixed with an annotation label of “ holotype of E. boninensis Tuyama, by B. A. Krukoff (1971).” However, Krukoff (1972: 136) mentioned that Tuyama’s specimen has flowers, and he recognized “ Takasi Tuyama s.n. (TI) April 14, 1934, from the Island of Bonin, Chichijima, Omura” as the holotype. Later, Krukoff (1974: 432) indicated “Island of Bonin: Chichijima, Omura, Takasi Tuyama s.n. (TI– holotype of E. boninensis).” Krukoff’s recognition for the holotype status is clearly his mistake, because the two specimens cited in the protologue should be treated as the syntypes (Art. 9.5.). However, his description of the content of the specimens (with flowers or not) and the label information (collector and date) were confused between the two syntypes. Thus, Krukoff’s recognition is regarded as an error to be corrected in lectotypification. Toyoda (1981) indicated Toyosima’s specimen (Z. Toyosima s.n., 1934, without locality information) as the type, but he did not consider its duplicates. Of the duplicates, we designated the specimen with Tuyama’s handwriting of “Typus floris” (TI [21506]), which is the same as the photo in the protologue, as the lectotype.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A15B8781FFE4820FFF4229B6FD26FD8F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Ohi-Toma, Tetsuo;Watanabe-Toma, Kana;Murata, Jin	Ohi-Toma, Tetsuo, Watanabe-Toma, Kana, Murata, Jin (2015): Typification of Angiospermae described from the Bonin Islands 2: Archichlamydeae. Phytotaxa 227 (1): 35-44, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.227.1.4, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.227.1.4
A15B8781FFE7820EFF422E96FEC2FECB.text	A15B8781FFE7820EFF422E96FEC2FECB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Celtis boninensis , Koidzumi 1913	<div><p>Celtis boninensis Koidzumi (1913: 183)</p> <p>≡ C. koidzumii Nakai (1914a: 265), nom. illeg. superfl. (Art. 52.1 of the ICN) Type (lectotype, designated here):— JAPAN. Bonin, without date, K. Kawate s.n. (TI [00144]!). Additional specimens examined:— JAPAN. Bonin, without date, K. Kawate s.n. (TI [00145]!); Bonin: Ototojima, 1 July 1901 (Meiji 34th),</p> <p>N. Kanehara s.n. (TI [00146]!); Ryukyu: Okinawa, without date, J. Matsumura s.n. (TI [00006740]!); Ryukyu: Okinawa, without date, T. Miyagi s.n. (TI [00006741]!); Ryukyu: Amami-oshima, without date, S. Amashima s.n. (TI [00006742]! TI [00006743]!).</p> <p>= Celtis liukiuensis Nakai (1914a: 265)</p> <p>Type (lectotype, designated here):— JAPAN. Ryukyu: Okinawa, without date, Matsumura s.n. (TI [00006740]!).</p> <p>Additional specimens examined:— JAPAN. Ryukyu: Okinawa, without date, T. Miyagi s.n. (TI [00006741]!); Ryukyu: Amami-oshima, without date, S. Amashima s.n. (TI [00006742]!, TI [00006743]!).</p> <p>Distribution:— Japan (the Bonin Islands and the Ryukyu Islands).</p> <p>Notes:—In the protologue of Celtis boninensis, Koidzumi (1913) indicated “Hab. Bonin. Liukiu, insl. Okinawa ” but cited no specimens. Nakai (1914a) divided the taxon into two different taxa and renamed both of them with descriptions in Japanese: C. koidzumii Nakai for plants in the Bonin Islands and C. liukiuensis Nakai for plants in the Ryukyu (= Liukiu) Islands. In it, however, no specimens were cited for the two names. Masamune (1934) described C. boninensis in the Flora of Yakushima Island, but did not mention the type specimen. In TI, a total of seven sheets with Koidzumi’s handwriting of “ Celtis boninensis Koidz.,” including three from Bonin and four from Ryukyu, should be regarded as the original material of C. boninensis. Toyoda (1981) recognized the specimen (K. Kawate s.n., 1913, without locality) in TI as the type of C. boninensis. Of the original material, we confirmed only two of Kawate’s specimens from Bonin: one with mature leaves (TI [00144]) and the other with young leaves and flowers (TI [00145]). Because these specimens lacked a collecting year, the lectotypification in Toyoda (1981) seems to be a correctable error. We designated the former of Kawate’s two specimens (Bonin, K. Kawate s.n., without date; TI [00144]) as the lectotype, because the diagnosis in the protologue (Koidzumi, 1913) emphasized leaf morphology.</p> <p>Herein, when Nakai (1914a) published C. koidzumii Nakai, he commented in Japanese that the name is a replacement for “ C. boninensis Koidz. pro parte,” which is equivalent to plants in the Bonin Islands. Of the original material of C. boninensis, three from the Bonin Islands additionally had “ p.p. ” (= pro parte) and “ Celtis koidzumii Nakai ” written on the label in Nakai’s handwriting. The three specimens are also regarded as the original material of C. koidzumii. Thus, C. koidzumii is a superfluous replacement name for C. boninensis (Art. 52.1 of the ICN, McNeill et al. 2012).</p> <p>In addition, Nakai (1914a) published C. liukiuensis Nakai for “ C. boninensis Koidz. pro parte,” which is equivalent to plants in the Ryukyu Islands, as a new taxon with a description in Japanese, but he cited no specimens. Later, Hatusima (1971), Masamune (1954), and Walker (1976) listed or described C. boninensis Koidzumi in their books on the flora of the Ryukyu Islands, but they did not mention the type specimens. Of the original material of C. boninensis, four sheets from the Ryukyu Islands additionally had “ p.p. ” (= pro parte) and “ Celtis liukiuensis Nakai ” written on the label in Nakai’s handwriting. Thus, the specimens were also the original material of C. liukiuensis, and we designated the specimen with “Regard as Type ” in old Japanese handwriting (J. Matsumura s.n.; TI [00006740]!) as the lectotype.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A15B8781FFE7820EFF422E96FEC2FECB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Ohi-Toma, Tetsuo;Watanabe-Toma, Kana;Murata, Jin	Ohi-Toma, Tetsuo, Watanabe-Toma, Kana, Murata, Jin (2015): Typification of Angiospermae described from the Bonin Islands 2: Archichlamydeae. Phytotaxa 227 (1): 35-44, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.227.1.4, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.227.1.4
A15B8781FFE6820EFF422DD6FD8BFB09.text	A15B8781FFE6820EFF422DD6FD8BFB09.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Morus boninensis , Koidzumi 1917	<div><p>Morus boninensis Koidzumi (1917: 38)</p> <p>Type (lectotype, designated here):— JAPAN. Bonin: Chichijima, without date, s. coll. (TI [00393]!).</p> <p>Additional specimens examined:— JAPAN. Bonin: Chichijima, Omura, 25 December 1902, K. Kawate s.n. (TI [00389]!); Bonin, July 1899 (Meiji 32th), s. coll. (TI [00390]!); Bonin, July 1912, Kusano s.n. (TI [00391]!, TI [00392]!); Bonin: Chichijima, 13 August 1900 (Meiji 33th), s. coll. (TI [00394]!).</p> <p>= Morus boninensis Koidz. var. caudatifolia Hotta (1938: 28)</p> <p>Type:— JAPAN. Bonin: Hahajima, Kuwanoki-yama, 18 November 1936, S. Ito, S. Imai &amp; K. Hino s.n. (holotype, SAPS [015172]!).</p> <p>Distribution:— Japan (endemic to Chichijima, Hahajima and Ototojima in the Bonin Islands).</p> <p>Notes:—In the protologue of Morus boninensis, Koidzumi (1917) indicated “Hab. Japonia: The Bonin Islands” but cited no specimens. When Hotta (1938) published M. boninensis Koidz. var. caudatifolia Hotta, he cited several specimens without the type status. Toyoda (1981) recognized the specimen in TI, whose collector and collecting year were unknown, as the type of Morus boninensis, but this lectotypification is inadequate because of the lack of specific information. In TI and KYO, we found six and two specimens, respectively, which had the scientific name with “ n. sp. ” on the label written in Koidzumi’s handwriting. The six specimens in TI were collected before the publication of the protologue, but the two in KYO were collected in 1921. Thus, the specimens in TI are regarded as the original material. Of them, the one without the collectors and a collecting year (TI [00393]) seems to correspond to the specimen recognized as a type by Toyoda (1981). The specimen with leaves and flowers has the best condition among the six original material, although the label information is insufficient. We regarded this specimen as the lectotype with respect to the typification of Toyoda (1981).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A15B8781FFE6820EFF422DD6FD8BFB09	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Ohi-Toma, Tetsuo;Watanabe-Toma, Kana;Murata, Jin	Ohi-Toma, Tetsuo, Watanabe-Toma, Kana, Murata, Jin (2015): Typification of Angiospermae described from the Bonin Islands 2: Archichlamydeae. Phytotaxa 227 (1): 35-44, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.227.1.4, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.227.1.4
A15B8781FFE68209FF422916FE74FEEF.text	A15B8781FFE68209FF422916FE74FEEF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Procris boninensis Tuyama 1935	<div><p>Procris boninensis Tuyama (1935: 371)</p> <p>Type (lectotype, designated here):— JAPAN. Bonin: Hahajima, Sekimon-yama, 9 April 1934, T. Tuyama s.n. (TI [00518]!, isolectotypes TI [00505]!, TI [00506]!, TI [00507]!, TI [00508]!, TI [00509]!).</p> <p>Additional specimens examined:— JAPAN. Bonin: Hahajima, Sekimon-yama, July 1932, H. Hara s.n. (syntype, TI [00513]!); Bonin: Hahajima, Sekimon-yama, 9 August 1905, H. Hattori s.n. (paratypes, TI [00496]!, TI [00497]!, TI [00498]!, TI [00499]!, TI [00500]!).</p> <p>Distribution:— Japan (endemic to Hahajima in the Bonin Islands).</p> <p>Notes:— Tuyama (1935) simultaneously designated two specimens in TI as types, “ T. Tuyama, Apr. 9. 1934 ” as “typus ♀ ” and “ H. Hara, Jul. 1932 ” as “typus ♂,” which are therefore syntypes (Art. 9.5 of the ICN, McNeill et al. 2012). He also cited two additional specimens without designating them as a type, and hence they are paratypes (see Art. 9.6 Note 5 Ex. 6 of the ICN, McNeill et al. 2012). Toyoda (1981) did not designate the lectotype since he cited both “ T. Tuyama, 1934, ♀ ” and “ H. Hara, 1932, ♂ ” as types. In TI, we found six duplicates of the former specimen and one sheet of the latter. In addition, one female specimen with an old “Typus” stamp (H. Hara T133, 28 June 1932; TI [00517]) was found.Although this specimen was collected by H. Hara in 1932, it is not a type because its collecting month is different from that of Hara’s syntype (TI [00513]). Herein, three sheets (TI [00505], [00506], and [00518]) of duplicates of Tuyama’s syntype were labeled as Procris boninensis Tuyama, but other sheets and Hara’s syntype were labeled as P. laevigata Blume. Of the former three, we designated the specimen with a Japanese name in Tuyama’s handwriting (TI [00518]), which had already been pressed with an old stamp of “Typus,” as the lectotype. In addition, for two paratypes cited in the protologue, we confirmed five duplicates of “ H. Hattori, Aug. 9. 1905,” of which one sheet is the same as the photo in the protologue. However, we could not find the other (“ T. Tuyama s.n., Aug. 5. 1933 ”) in TI or other herbaria.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A15B8781FFE68209FF422916FE74FEEF	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Ohi-Toma, Tetsuo;Watanabe-Toma, Kana;Murata, Jin	Ohi-Toma, Tetsuo, Watanabe-Toma, Kana, Murata, Jin (2015): Typification of Angiospermae described from the Bonin Islands 2: Archichlamydeae. Phytotaxa 227 (1): 35-44, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.227.1.4, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.227.1.4
A15B8781FFE18209FF422DB6FEDEFBBD.text	A15B8781FFE18209FF422DB6FEDEFBBD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Melastoma tetramerum Hayata 1913	<div><p>Melastoma tetramerum Hayata (1913: 120)</p> <p>Type (lectotype, designated here):— JAPAN. Bonin: Chichijima, Hatsune-ura, 25 July 1905, H. Hattori s.n. (TI [04105]!, isolectotype TI [04108]!).</p> <p>Additional specimens examined:— JAPAN. Bonin: Chichijima, Hatsune, 25 July 1905, H. Hattori s.n. (syntypes, TI [04106]!, TI [04107]!, TI [04116]!, TI [04117]!).</p> <p>Distribution:— Japan (endemic to Chichijima in the Bonin Islands).</p> <p>Notes:— Hayata (1913) indicated “Hab. Bonin: Chichijima-Hatsunejima, Juli. 1905, leg H. Hattori.” Toyoda (1981) recognized the specimen (H. Hattori, 1905) in TI as the type. We found six sheets that were collected from Chichijima by H. Hattori on 25 July 1905. All of them are regarded as the original material based on Hayata’s handwriting of “ Melastoma tetramerum Hay. ” on the label. However, their localities are not “Hatsunejima” in the protologue but “Hatsune-ura” for two sheets and “Hatsune” for four sheets. The difference in the locality name is probably an error in the protologue. We regarded these original material as the syntypes, which contain duplicates from two different localities. On one (TI [04105]) of the two duplicates from “Hatsune-ura,” a comment of “Very distinct for it tetramerous flowers and its leaves which are much smaller than these of any species of the genus,” which was consistent with a sentence in the protologue, was written in Hayata’s handwriting. We designated the specimen with the comment as the lectotype (see Rec. 9A.3 of the ICN, McNeill et al. 2012) and its duplicates (TI [04108]) as the isolectotypes.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A15B8781FFE18209FF422DB6FEDEFBBD	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Ohi-Toma, Tetsuo;Watanabe-Toma, Kana;Murata, Jin	Ohi-Toma, Tetsuo, Watanabe-Toma, Kana, Murata, Jin (2015): Typification of Angiospermae described from the Bonin Islands 2: Archichlamydeae. Phytotaxa 227 (1): 35-44, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.227.1.4, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.227.1.4
A15B8781FFE18208FF422976FC20FC1B.text	A15B8781FFE18208FF422976FC20FC1B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Melicope grisea var. grisea (Planchon) T. G. Hartley 2001	<div><p>Melicope grisea (Planchon) T.G. Hartley (2001: 257) var. grisea</p> <p>≡ Boninia grisea Planchon in Triana &amp; Planchon (1872: 310)</p> <p>Type:— JAPAN. Bonin, s.coll. 56, (holotype, K [K 000717467]!, digital image).</p> <p>= Boninia glabra Planchon f. macrophylla Nakai (1922: 123)</p> <p>Type (lectotype, designated here):— JAPAN. Bonin: Naka-iwoto, 23 June 1922, T. Nakai s.n. (TI [02480]!).</p> <p>Additional specimens examined:— JAPAN. Bonin: Naka-iwoto, 23 June 1920, T. Nakai s.n. (TI [02481]!); Bonin: Hahajima, Kitamura, 19 June 1920, T. Nakai s.n. (TI [02339]!, TI [02340]!, TI [02341]!); Bonin: Hahajima, 19 June 1920, T. Nakai s.n. (TI [02342]!); Bonin: Hahajima, 15 July 1921, T. Nakai s.n. (TI [02332]!, TI [02333]!, TI [02334]!, TI [02335]!, TI [02336]!, TI [02337]!); Bonin: Hahajima, 16 July 1921, T. Nakai s.n. (TI [02338]!); Bonin: Kita-iwoto, 21 June 1920, T. Nakai s.n. (TI [02477]!, TI [02478]!, TI [02479]!).</p> <p>Distribution:— Japan (endemic to the Bonin Islands).</p> <p>Notes:—In the protologue of Boninia glabra f. macrophylla, Nakai (1922) indicated three localities: “Hab. Bonin: in insula Naka-iwoto ubi haec forma tantum crescit sat vulgaris. (T. Nakai), in insula Hahajima et insula Kita-iwoto cum typica mixta sed potius rara (T. Nakai).” Considering that the protologue was published in November 1922, a total of 16 sheets in TI that were collected by T. Nakai can be regarded as the original material: two specimens from Naka-iwoto (T. Nakai s.n., 23 June 1922 and T. Nakai s.n., 23 June 1920), three duplicates from Kitamura of Hahajima (T. Nakai s.n., 19 June 1920), eight sheets of three different collections from Hahajima (one of T. Nakai s.n., 19 June 1920, six of T. Nakai s.n., 15 July 1921, and one of T. Nakai s.n., 16 July 1921), and three duplicates from Kita-iwoto (T. Nakai s.n., 21 June 1920). Of them, the first two specimens from Naka-iwoto had “var. macrophylla Nakai ” written on the label in Nakai’s handwriting. In addition, on the label of one (TI [02481]) of the two, someone drew a strikethrough on the species epithet “ glabra ” and “var. macrophylla Nakai ” and additionally wrote the name “ grisea.” We designated the other sheet without a strikethrough (TI [02480]) as the lectotype.</p> <p>Melicope grisea (Planchon) T.G.Hartley var. crassifolia (Nakai) Yonekura (2005: 326)</p> <p>≡ Boninia glabra Planchon var. crassifolia Nakai (1922: 124)</p> <p>≡ B. crassifolia Nakai (1928: 5) and Nakai (1930b: 257), nom. nud.</p> <p>≡ B. grisea Planchon var. crassifolia (Nakai) T. Yamazaki (1989: 276), nom. nud.</p> <p>≡ B. grisea Planchon var. crassifolia (Nakai) T.Yamaz. ex H. Ohba (1999: 34)</p> <p>Type (lectotype, designated here):— JAPAN. Bonin: Anijima (in Japanese), 13 July 1922, T. Nakai s.n. (TI [02446]!).</p> <p>Additional specimens examined:— JAPAN. Bonin: Anijima, 3 July 1921, T. Nakai s.n. (syntype, TI [02430]!); Bonin: Anijima (in Japanese), 13 July 1922, T. Nakai s.n. (syntype, TI [02445]!).</p> <p>Distribution:— Japan (endemic to Anijima and Chichijima in the Bonin Islands).</p> <p>Notes:—In the protologue of Boninia glabra var. crassifolia, Nakai (1922) indicated “Hab. Bonin: in silvis Anijima ubi tantum tres inveni (T. Nakai),” which means that he collected plants at only three places on Anijima Island. We regarded Nakai’s three specimens in TI, which were collected from Anijima before publication of the protologue (Nov. 1922), as the original material: the first with Nakai’s handwriting of “ Boninia crassifolia Nakai ” (T. Nakai s.n., 3 July 1921), the second with his handwriting of “ Boninia glabra Planchon var. crassifolia Nakai ” (T. Nakai s.n., 13 July 1922), and the last with his handwriting giving both scientific names (T. Nakai s.n., 13 July 1922). Considering his comment in the protologue, it is thought that the last two specimens collected on the same day came from different plants. Here, we designated the last specimen (TI [02446]), on which were written the names of both the rank of the species and the variety on the label in Nakai’s handwriting, as the lectotype.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A15B8781FFE18208FF422976FC20FC1B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Ohi-Toma, Tetsuo;Watanabe-Toma, Kana;Murata, Jin	Ohi-Toma, Tetsuo, Watanabe-Toma, Kana, Murata, Jin (2015): Typification of Angiospermae described from the Bonin Islands 2: Archichlamydeae. Phytotaxa 227 (1): 35-44, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.227.1.4, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.227.1.4
A15B8781FFE0820BFF422816FEDCFE5B.text	A15B8781FFE0820BFF422816FEDCFE5B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hibiscus glaber (Matsumura) Matsumura ex Nakai. Herein 1914	<div><p>Hibiscus glaber Matsumura ex Nakai (1914b: 310)</p> <p>≡ H. tiliaceus Linnaeus var. glaber Matsumura (1897: 441), nom. nud. ≡ Paritium glabrum (Matsum. ex Nakai) Nakai (1936: 99) ≡ Talipariti glabrum (Matsum. ex Nakai) Fryxell (2001: 245) Type (lectotype, designated here):— JAPAN. Bonin (= “Ogasawarajima” in roman letters), without date, s. coll. (TI [03265]!). Additional specimens examined:— JAPAN. Bonin (= “Ogasawarajima” in Japanese), without date, s. coll. (TI [03260]! TI [03261]! TI</p> <p>[03264]!); Bonin, 10 December (without year), s. coll. (TI [03259]!); Bonin, 23 August (without year), s. coll. (TI [03262]!); Bonin,</p> <p>26 August (without year), s. coll. (TI [03263]!).</p> <p>= Hibiscus glaber Matsum. ex Nakai var. cordatus Nakai (1914b: 310)</p> <p>Type:— JAPAN. Bonin: Chichijima, 13 August 1905, H. Hattori s.n. (holotype, TI [03266]!).</p> <p>Distribution:— Japan (endemic to the Bonin Islands).</p> <p>Notes:— Matsumura (1897) listed “ Hibiscus tiliaceus L. var. glabra Matsumura var. nov. Hab. In insula Bonin” as a candidate new variety of H. tiliaceus without a description or diagnosis. Even though the name was nomen nudum, Hattori (1908) and Matsumura (1912) listed the name H. tiliaceus L. var. glabra Matsumura. After Nakai (1914b) legitimately published it as H. glaber Matsumura with the citation of “ Hibiscus tiliaceus, L. var. glabra, Matsumura. ms.,” Matsumura (1916) listed it as H. glaber Matsumura in the checklist of Japanese plants. Nakai (1936) published Paritium glabrum Nakai as a new combination name. Hara (1954) recognized the taxon as H. glaber (Matsumura) Matsumura ex Nakai. Herein, the correct citation is H. glaber Matsumura ex Nakai. On the other hand, no one had indicated the type or cited the specimens until Toyoda (1981) regarded the specimen in TI, whose collectors and collecting year are unknown, as the type. In TI, we found seven specimens with Matsumura’s handwriting of “var. glabra,” whose collectors and collecting year are unknown, and therefore, we regarded the seven as the original material. Thus, the indication in Toyoda (1981) is inadequate as a lectotypification. Of the original material, four specimens have locality information of “Ogasawarajima” without a collecting date, of which one (TI [03265]) was written in Roman letters and the others (TI [03260], TI [03261], and TI [03264]) in Japanese. The other three original material have the locality information of “Bonin” and a collecting date (without collecting year). Fryxell (2001) later cited “Ogasawarajima, Matsumura s.n. ” in TI as the holotype for H. glaber Matsumura ex Nakai. However, the use of the term holotype is an error to be corrected to lectotype (Art. 9.9 of the ICN, McNeill et al. 2012), and the collector name seems to be a correctable error because we could not find Matsumura’s specimens in TI. We designated the specimen without a collector and a collecting year (TI [03265]), with “Ogasawarajima” written in Roman letters, as the lectotype.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A15B8781FFE0820BFF422816FEDCFE5B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Ohi-Toma, Tetsuo;Watanabe-Toma, Kana;Murata, Jin	Ohi-Toma, Tetsuo, Watanabe-Toma, Kana, Murata, Jin (2015): Typification of Angiospermae described from the Bonin Islands 2: Archichlamydeae. Phytotaxa 227 (1): 35-44, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.227.1.4, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.227.1.4
A15B8781FFE3820BFF422DDCFBC2FB3B.text	A15B8781FFE3820BFF422DDCFBC2FB3B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hibiscus tiliaceus Linnaeus 1753	<div><p>Hibiscus tiliaceus Linnaeus (1753: 694)</p> <p>≡ Paritium tiliaceum (L.) Jussieu in Saint-Hilaire et al. (1828: 256)</p> <p>≡ Talipariti tiliaceum (L.) Fryxell (2001: 258)</p> <p>Type (lectotype, designated by Waalkes 1966: 31):— INDIA, Herb. Hermann 3: 51. no. 259 (BM).</p> <p>= Hibiscus boninensis Nakai (1914b: 311)</p> <p>≡ Paritium boninense (Nakai) Nakai (1936: 98)</p> <p>Type:— JAPAN. Bonin, Mukojima, 5 August 1905, H. Hattori s.n. (holotype, TI [03357]!; isotype, TI [03358]!).</p> <p>= Hibiscus tiliaceus L. var. heterophyllus Nakai (1914b: 310)</p> <p>≡ Paritium tiliaefolium (Salisbury 1796: 383) Nakai (1936: 101) var. heterophyllum (Nakai) Nakai (1936: 101)</p> <p>Type (lectotype, designated here):— JAPAN. Bonin, 7 March 1879, s. coll. (TI [03424]!).</p> <p>Additional specimens examined:— JAPAN. Bonin: Chichijima, Omura, 8 November (without year), N. Okada s.n. (TI [03425]!); Bonin, without date, s. coll., “Maxim. No.52” (TI [03426]!).</p> <p>Distribution:—native of tropical regions of the world.</p> <p>Notes:—In the protologue of Hibiscus tiliaceus Linnaeus var. heterophyllus, Nakai (1914b) strictly cited no specimens. Three specimens, which were labeled as “var. heterophyllus Nakai ” in Nakai’s handwriting, were found in TI. Of them, the collecting year of two of the specimens is unknown, but they can be considered to have been collected before 1914, the publication year of the protologue, based on the investigation of an old label head of herbarium TI and the handwriting (Murata et al. 2012). We regarded the three specimens at TI as the original material, and we designated the specimen with a collecting date of “ 7 March 1879 ” (TI [03424]) as the lectotype.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A15B8781FFE3820BFF422DDCFBC2FB3B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Ohi-Toma, Tetsuo;Watanabe-Toma, Kana;Murata, Jin	Ohi-Toma, Tetsuo, Watanabe-Toma, Kana, Murata, Jin (2015): Typification of Angiospermae described from the Bonin Islands 2: Archichlamydeae. Phytotaxa 227 (1): 35-44, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.227.1.4, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.227.1.4
A15B8781FFE3820AFF4229F6FA7EFE83.text	A15B8781FFE3820AFF4229F6FA7EFE83.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pisonia umbellifera (J. R. Forster & G. Forster) Seemann 1862	<div><p>Pisonia umbellifera (J.R.Forster &amp; G.Forster) Seemann (1862: 154)</p> <p>≡ Ceodes umbellifera J.R.Forster &amp; G. Forster (1775: 142)</p> <p>Type:—[icon] J. R. Forster &amp; G. Forster, Characteres Generum Plantarum, t. 71 (1775, holotype).</p> <p>= Pisonia nishimurae Koidzumi (1919: 120)</p> <p>≡ Calpidia nishimurae (Koidz.) Rehder &amp; E.H.Wilson (1919: 117)</p> <p>Type (lectotype, designated here):— JAPAN. Bonin, without date, M. Yai s.n. (TI [00670]!).</p> <p>Additional specimens examined:— JAPAN. Bonin, without date, S. Nishimura s.n., “ Pisonia nishimurai Koidz. ” (syntype, KYO!).</p> <p>Distribution:— Japan (the Bonin Islands and the Ryukyu Islands), Taiwan, Malaysia, Micronesia, Polynesia and Australia.</p> <p>Notes:—In the protologue of Pisonia nishimurae, Koidzumi (1919) did not designate the type, but indicated “Distr. Bonin, (leg. M. Yai! S. Niseimura!).” When Rehder and Wilson (1919) moved the taxon under the genus Calpidia Thouars (1806: 36), they regarded “ M. Yai and S. Nishimura, ex Koidzumi” as the type. They probably referred to the protologue, but did not confirm the specimen. Their perception of the collector of the type is a correctable error, because we could not find specimens collected by both M. Yai and S. Nishimura. We found one specimen (M. Yai s.n.) in TI, which is stamped as “Typus,” and two specimens (S. Nishimura s.n.) in KYO, although their collecting date was unknown. Of them, two specimens with Koidzumi’s handwriting of “ Pisonia nishimurai Koidz. ” kept in TI and KYO are original material, but one in KYO with his handwriting of “ Calpidia nishimurai Nakai ” is not. In the protologue, Koidzumi (1919) named “Udoki” as a Japanese name of the taxa. Of the two original material, the specimen in TI was labeled “Udoki” in Japanese, but the specimen in KYO was labeled “Udonoki” in Japanese. Therefore, we designated the specimen (M. Yai s.n., TI [00670]) as the lectotype and the specimen (S. Nishimura s.n., KYO) as the syntype.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A15B8781FFE3820AFF4229F6FA7EFE83	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Ohi-Toma, Tetsuo;Watanabe-Toma, Kana;Murata, Jin	Ohi-Toma, Tetsuo, Watanabe-Toma, Kana, Murata, Jin (2015): Typification of Angiospermae described from the Bonin Islands 2: Archichlamydeae. Phytotaxa 227 (1): 35-44, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.227.1.4, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.227.1.4
A15B8781FFE2820AFF422DCFFE06FA35.text	A15B8781FFE2820AFF422DCFFE06FA35.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Theaceae	<div><p>Theaceae</p> <p>Schima wallichii (Candolle 1824: 528) Korthals (1842: 143) subsp. mertensiana (Siebold &amp; Zuccarini) Bloembergen (1952: 149)</p> <p>≡ Cleyera mertensiana Siebold &amp; Zuccarini (1841: 154)</p> <p>≡ S. mertensiana (Siebold &amp; Zucc.) Koidzumi (1930: 107)</p> <p>Type (lectotype, designated by Akiyama et al. 2014: 211):— JAPAN. Mertens legit in Insel. Bonin, Communicavit Zuccarini ex Mertensii (L 2405468).</p> <p>= Schima boninensis Nakai (1918: 222), non Melchior (1925: 139) Type (lectotype, designated here):— JAPAN. Bonin: Chichijima, Asahi-daira, 13 July 1905, H. Hattori s.n. (TI [03637]!). Additional specimens examined:— JAPAN. Bonin: Chichijima, Mikazuki-yama, 11 July 1905, H. Hattori s.n. (TI [03611]!); Bonin:</p> <p>Chichijima, Asahi-yama, 23 July 1905, H. Hattori s.n. (TI [03636]!); Bonin: Chichijima, Mikazuki-yama, without date, s. coll. (TI</p> <p>[03639]!).</p> <p>= S. boninensis Melchior (1925: 139), non Nakai (1918: 222), nom. illeg. (Art. 53.1 of the ICN)</p> <p>Distribution:— Japan (the Bonin Islands).</p> <p>Notes:—In the protologue of Schima boninensis, Nakai (1918) indicated “Hab. Bonin: in insula Chichishima (Hirotaro Hattori, Tomijiro Uchiyama),” and cited “ S. Noronhae, Reinw. var. boninensis, Hayata in Schéd. Herb. Imp. Univ. Tokyo.” Later, Bloembergen (1952) indicated “ H. Hattori (Lit.), T. Uchiyama (Lit., type of Schima boninensis Nakai),” but he probably did not confirm the specimens because “Lit.” means that he checked the literature. In TI, we found three specimens that were collected from Chichijima on different days in July 1905 by H. Hattori. Of them, one (TI [03637]) had “ Schima noronhae var. boninensis H.” written on the label in Hayata’s handwriting, which is consistent with the citation in the protologue. On the other hand, we could not find Uchiyama’s specimens, but we found an anonymous specimen (TI [03639]) without a label but on which “ Schima noronhae var. boninensis H.” was directly written in Hayata’s handwriting. The specimen, whose collector may be T. Uchiyama, should be an original material along with the three Hattori’s specimens. Here, the specimen with Hayata’s handwriting (TI [03637]) was designated as the lectotype, because it has the annotation of “ Schima boninensis Nakai ” by T. Nakai in 1918 (Art. 9A.3 of the ICN, McNeill et al. 2012).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A15B8781FFE2820AFF422DCFFE06FA35	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Ohi-Toma, Tetsuo;Watanabe-Toma, Kana;Murata, Jin	Ohi-Toma, Tetsuo, Watanabe-Toma, Kana, Murata, Jin (2015): Typification of Angiospermae described from the Bonin Islands 2: Archichlamydeae. Phytotaxa 227 (1): 35-44, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.227.1.4, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.227.1.4
