taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
9E0DB32AA360061DFC288485FAC036C7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912125/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912125	Fig. 1. Genal striae of females. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898. C. A. texanusCresson, 1872 s. s. D. Zoomed-in view ofA. texanuss. s. striae, image of paralectotype (MCZENT548), provided by Zoe Flores and Crystal Maier of the MCZ. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 1. Genal striae of females. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898. C. A. texanusCresson, 1872 s. s. D. Zoomed-in view ofA. texanuss. s. striae, image of paralectotype (MCZENT548), provided by Zoe Flores and Crystal Maier of the MCZ. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA360061DFC288485FAC036C7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912128/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912128	Fig. 2. Comparison of Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924 and A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898, female head and clypeus. A. A. angelicus, face. B. A. angelicus, apex of clypeus. C. A. subtilior, face. D. A. subtilior, apex of clypeus. Scale bars: A, C = 1 mm; B, D = 500 µm.	Fig. 2. Comparison of Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924 and A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898, female head and clypeus. A. A. angelicus, face. B. A. angelicus, apex of clypeus. C. A. subtilior, face. D. A. subtilior, apex of clypeus. Scale bars: A, C = 1 mm; B, D = 500 µm.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA360061DFC288485FAC036C7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912130/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912130	Fig. 3. Thorax of Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924 and A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898, females. A. A. angelicus, propodeum. B. A. subtilior, propodeum. C. A. angelicus, side. D. A. subtilior, side. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 3. Thorax of Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924 and A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898, females. A. A. angelicus, propodeum. B. A. subtilior, propodeum. C. A. angelicus, side. D. A. subtilior, side. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA360061DFC288485FAC036C7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912132/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912132	Fig. 4. Female metasoma comparison. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898. C. A. texanus Cresson, 1872 s. s. D. A. angelicus, T1 and T2, with red arrow pointing to lateral areas basal to premarginal line with denser punctures. E. A. subtilior, T1 and T2, with red arrow pointing to area of sparser punctures. F. A. texanus s. s., T1 and T2, with red arrow pointing to area of denser punctures. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 4. Female metasoma comparison. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898. C. A. texanus Cresson, 1872 s. s. D. A. angelicus, T1 and T2, with red arrow pointing to lateral areas basal to premarginal line with denser punctures. E. A. subtilior, T1 and T2, with red arrow pointing to area of sparser punctures. F. A. texanus s. s., T1 and T2, with red arrow pointing to area of denser punctures. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA360061DFC288485FAC036C7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912136/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912136	Fig. 5. Male hind legs. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924, anterior view. B. A. angelicus, posterior view. C. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898, lightest color, anterior view. D. A. subtilior, lightest color, posterior view. E. A. subtilior, anterior view. F. A. subtilior, posterior view. G. A. subtilior, dark, anterior view. H. A. subtilior, dark, posterior view. I. A. texanus Cresson, 1872, anterior view. J. A. texanus, posterior view. K. A. angelicus, basitarsus. L. A. subtilior, basitarsus. M. A. texanus, basitarsus. Scale bars: A–J = 1 mm; K–M = 500 µm.	Fig. 5. Male hind legs. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924, anterior view. B. A. angelicus, posterior view. C. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898, lightest color, anterior view. D. A. subtilior, lightest color, posterior view. E. A. subtilior, anterior view. F. A. subtilior, posterior view. G. A. subtilior, dark, anterior view. H. A. subtilior, dark, posterior view. I. A. texanus Cresson, 1872, anterior view. J. A. texanus, posterior view. K. A. angelicus, basitarsus. L. A. subtilior, basitarsus. M. A. texanus, basitarsus. Scale bars: A–J = 1 mm; K–M = 500 µm.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA360061DFC288485FAC036C7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912138/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912138	Fig. 6. Apical view of male genitalia. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898. C. A. texanus Cresson, 1872 s. s. D. A. texanus s. s., zoomed in with black arrow pointing to more evenly curved lower stylus. E. A. subtilior zoomed in with black arrow pointing to more laterally extending lower stylus. Scale bars: 500 µm.	Fig. 6. Apical view of male genitalia. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898. C. A. texanus Cresson, 1872 s. s. D. A. texanus s. s., zoomed in with black arrow pointing to more evenly curved lower stylus. E. A. subtilior zoomed in with black arrow pointing to more laterally extending lower stylus. Scale bars: 500 µm.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA3670609FFEC814AFBED3447.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912125/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912125	Fig. 1. Genal striae of females. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898. C. A. texanusCresson, 1872 s. s. D. Zoomed-in view ofA. texanuss. s. striae, image of paralectotype (MCZENT548), provided by Zoe Flores and Crystal Maier of the MCZ. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 1. Genal striae of females. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898. C. A. texanusCresson, 1872 s. s. D. Zoomed-in view ofA. texanuss. s. striae, image of paralectotype (MCZENT548), provided by Zoe Flores and Crystal Maier of the MCZ. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA3670609FFEC814AFBED3447.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912128/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912128	Fig. 2. Comparison of Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924 and A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898, female head and clypeus. A. A. angelicus, face. B. A. angelicus, apex of clypeus. C. A. subtilior, face. D. A. subtilior, apex of clypeus. Scale bars: A, C = 1 mm; B, D = 500 µm.	Fig. 2. Comparison of Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924 and A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898, female head and clypeus. A. A. angelicus, face. B. A. angelicus, apex of clypeus. C. A. subtilior, face. D. A. subtilior, apex of clypeus. Scale bars: A, C = 1 mm; B, D = 500 µm.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA3670609FFEC814AFBED3447.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912130/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912130	Fig. 3. Thorax of Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924 and A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898, females. A. A. angelicus, propodeum. B. A. subtilior, propodeum. C. A. angelicus, side. D. A. subtilior, side. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 3. Thorax of Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924 and A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898, females. A. A. angelicus, propodeum. B. A. subtilior, propodeum. C. A. angelicus, side. D. A. subtilior, side. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA3670609FFEC814AFBED3447.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912132/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912132	Fig. 4. Female metasoma comparison. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898. C. A. texanus Cresson, 1872 s. s. D. A. angelicus, T1 and T2, with red arrow pointing to lateral areas basal to premarginal line with denser punctures. E. A. subtilior, T1 and T2, with red arrow pointing to area of sparser punctures. F. A. texanus s. s., T1 and T2, with red arrow pointing to area of denser punctures. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 4. Female metasoma comparison. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898. C. A. texanus Cresson, 1872 s. s. D. A. angelicus, T1 and T2, with red arrow pointing to lateral areas basal to premarginal line with denser punctures. E. A. subtilior, T1 and T2, with red arrow pointing to area of sparser punctures. F. A. texanus s. s., T1 and T2, with red arrow pointing to area of denser punctures. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA3670609FFEC814AFBED3447.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912136/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912136	Fig. 5. Male hind legs. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924, anterior view. B. A. angelicus, posterior view. C. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898, lightest color, anterior view. D. A. subtilior, lightest color, posterior view. E. A. subtilior, anterior view. F. A. subtilior, posterior view. G. A. subtilior, dark, anterior view. H. A. subtilior, dark, posterior view. I. A. texanus Cresson, 1872, anterior view. J. A. texanus, posterior view. K. A. angelicus, basitarsus. L. A. subtilior, basitarsus. M. A. texanus, basitarsus. Scale bars: A–J = 1 mm; K–M = 500 µm.	Fig. 5. Male hind legs. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924, anterior view. B. A. angelicus, posterior view. C. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898, lightest color, anterior view. D. A. subtilior, lightest color, posterior view. E. A. subtilior, anterior view. F. A. subtilior, posterior view. G. A. subtilior, dark, anterior view. H. A. subtilior, dark, posterior view. I. A. texanus Cresson, 1872, anterior view. J. A. texanus, posterior view. K. A. angelicus, basitarsus. L. A. subtilior, basitarsus. M. A. texanus, basitarsus. Scale bars: A–J = 1 mm; K–M = 500 µm.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA3670609FFEC814AFBED3447.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912138/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912138	Fig. 6. Apical view of male genitalia. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898. C. A. texanus Cresson, 1872 s. s. D. A. texanus s. s., zoomed in with black arrow pointing to more evenly curved lower stylus. E. A. subtilior zoomed in with black arrow pointing to more laterally extending lower stylus. Scale bars: 500 µm.	Fig. 6. Apical view of male genitalia. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898. C. A. texanus Cresson, 1872 s. s. D. A. texanus s. s., zoomed in with black arrow pointing to more evenly curved lower stylus. E. A. subtilior zoomed in with black arrow pointing to more laterally extending lower stylus. Scale bars: 500 µm.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA3670609FFEC814AFBED3447.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912142/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912142	Fig. 7. Range maps of specimens examined by the authors. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898.	Fig. 7. Range maps of specimens examined by the authors. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA3670609FFEC814AFBED3447.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912144/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912144	Fig. 8. Range maps of specimens examined by the authors. A. Agapostemon texanus Cresson, 1872 s. s. B. Distribution of A. angelicus Cockerell, 1924 in Minnesota. C. Distribution of A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898 in Minnesota. D. Distribution of A. texanus s. s. in Minnesota.	Fig. 8. Range maps of specimens examined by the authors. A. Agapostemon texanus Cresson, 1872 s. s. B. Distribution of A. angelicus Cockerell, 1924 in Minnesota. C. Distribution of A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898 in Minnesota. D. Distribution of A. texanus s. s. in Minnesota.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA3730604FFBE84F6FB683362.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912125/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912125	Fig. 1. Genal striae of females. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898. C. A. texanusCresson, 1872 s. s. D. Zoomed-in view ofA. texanuss. s. striae, image of paralectotype (MCZENT548), provided by Zoe Flores and Crystal Maier of the MCZ. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 1. Genal striae of females. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898. C. A. texanusCresson, 1872 s. s. D. Zoomed-in view ofA. texanuss. s. striae, image of paralectotype (MCZENT548), provided by Zoe Flores and Crystal Maier of the MCZ. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA3730604FFBE84F6FB683362.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912128/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912128	Fig. 2. Comparison of Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924 and A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898, female head and clypeus. A. A. angelicus, face. B. A. angelicus, apex of clypeus. C. A. subtilior, face. D. A. subtilior, apex of clypeus. Scale bars: A, C = 1 mm; B, D = 500 µm.	Fig. 2. Comparison of Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924 and A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898, female head and clypeus. A. A. angelicus, face. B. A. angelicus, apex of clypeus. C. A. subtilior, face. D. A. subtilior, apex of clypeus. Scale bars: A, C = 1 mm; B, D = 500 µm.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA3730604FFBE84F6FB683362.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912130/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912130	Fig. 3. Thorax of Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924 and A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898, females. A. A. angelicus, propodeum. B. A. subtilior, propodeum. C. A. angelicus, side. D. A. subtilior, side. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 3. Thorax of Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924 and A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898, females. A. A. angelicus, propodeum. B. A. subtilior, propodeum. C. A. angelicus, side. D. A. subtilior, side. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA3730604FFBE84F6FB683362.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912132/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912132	Fig. 4. Female metasoma comparison. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898. C. A. texanus Cresson, 1872 s. s. D. A. angelicus, T1 and T2, with red arrow pointing to lateral areas basal to premarginal line with denser punctures. E. A. subtilior, T1 and T2, with red arrow pointing to area of sparser punctures. F. A. texanus s. s., T1 and T2, with red arrow pointing to area of denser punctures. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 4. Female metasoma comparison. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898. C. A. texanus Cresson, 1872 s. s. D. A. angelicus, T1 and T2, with red arrow pointing to lateral areas basal to premarginal line with denser punctures. E. A. subtilior, T1 and T2, with red arrow pointing to area of sparser punctures. F. A. texanus s. s., T1 and T2, with red arrow pointing to area of denser punctures. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA3730604FFBE84F6FB683362.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912136/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912136	Fig. 5. Male hind legs. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924, anterior view. B. A. angelicus, posterior view. C. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898, lightest color, anterior view. D. A. subtilior, lightest color, posterior view. E. A. subtilior, anterior view. F. A. subtilior, posterior view. G. A. subtilior, dark, anterior view. H. A. subtilior, dark, posterior view. I. A. texanus Cresson, 1872, anterior view. J. A. texanus, posterior view. K. A. angelicus, basitarsus. L. A. subtilior, basitarsus. M. A. texanus, basitarsus. Scale bars: A–J = 1 mm; K–M = 500 µm.	Fig. 5. Male hind legs. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924, anterior view. B. A. angelicus, posterior view. C. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898, lightest color, anterior view. D. A. subtilior, lightest color, posterior view. E. A. subtilior, anterior view. F. A. subtilior, posterior view. G. A. subtilior, dark, anterior view. H. A. subtilior, dark, posterior view. I. A. texanus Cresson, 1872, anterior view. J. A. texanus, posterior view. K. A. angelicus, basitarsus. L. A. subtilior, basitarsus. M. A. texanus, basitarsus. Scale bars: A–J = 1 mm; K–M = 500 µm.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA3730604FFBE84F6FB683362.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912138/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912138	Fig. 6. Apical view of male genitalia. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898. C. A. texanus Cresson, 1872 s. s. D. A. texanus s. s., zoomed in with black arrow pointing to more evenly curved lower stylus. E. A. subtilior zoomed in with black arrow pointing to more laterally extending lower stylus. Scale bars: 500 µm.	Fig. 6. Apical view of male genitalia. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898. C. A. texanus Cresson, 1872 s. s. D. A. texanus s. s., zoomed in with black arrow pointing to more evenly curved lower stylus. E. A. subtilior zoomed in with black arrow pointing to more laterally extending lower stylus. Scale bars: 500 µm.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA3730604FFBE84F6FB683362.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912142/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912142	Fig. 7. Range maps of specimens examined by the authors. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898.	Fig. 7. Range maps of specimens examined by the authors. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA3730604FFBE84F6FB683362.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912144/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912144	Fig. 8. Range maps of specimens examined by the authors. A. Agapostemon texanus Cresson, 1872 s. s. B. Distribution of A. angelicus Cockerell, 1924 in Minnesota. C. Distribution of A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898 in Minnesota. D. Distribution of A. texanus s. s. in Minnesota.	Fig. 8. Range maps of specimens examined by the authors. A. Agapostemon texanus Cresson, 1872 s. s. B. Distribution of A. angelicus Cockerell, 1924 in Minnesota. C. Distribution of A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898 in Minnesota. D. Distribution of A. texanus s. s. in Minnesota.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA3730604FFBE84F6FB683362.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912148/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912148	Fig. 9. Agapostemon subtilior Cockerell, 1898, neotype, female (UCMC0000005). A. Dorsal view of head and thorax. B. Propodeum. C. Lateral view with inset of labels. Images provided by Bekka Shupe and Virginia Scott (UCMC).	Fig. 9. Agapostemon subtilior Cockerell, 1898, neotype, female (UCMC0000005). A. Dorsal view of head and thorax. B. Propodeum. C. Lateral view with inset of labels. Images provided by Bekka Shupe and Virginia Scott (UCMC).	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA37E0638FFF883ECFD87346C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912125/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912125	Fig. 1. Genal striae of females. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898. C. A. texanusCresson, 1872 s. s. D. Zoomed-in view ofA. texanuss. s. striae, image of paralectotype (MCZENT548), provided by Zoe Flores and Crystal Maier of the MCZ. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 1. Genal striae of females. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898. C. A. texanusCresson, 1872 s. s. D. Zoomed-in view ofA. texanuss. s. striae, image of paralectotype (MCZENT548), provided by Zoe Flores and Crystal Maier of the MCZ. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA37E0638FFF883ECFD87346C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912132/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912132	Fig. 4. Female metasoma comparison. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898. C. A. texanus Cresson, 1872 s. s. D. A. angelicus, T1 and T2, with red arrow pointing to lateral areas basal to premarginal line with denser punctures. E. A. subtilior, T1 and T2, with red arrow pointing to area of sparser punctures. F. A. texanus s. s., T1 and T2, with red arrow pointing to area of denser punctures. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 4. Female metasoma comparison. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898. C. A. texanus Cresson, 1872 s. s. D. A. angelicus, T1 and T2, with red arrow pointing to lateral areas basal to premarginal line with denser punctures. E. A. subtilior, T1 and T2, with red arrow pointing to area of sparser punctures. F. A. texanus s. s., T1 and T2, with red arrow pointing to area of denser punctures. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA37E0638FFF883ECFD87346C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912136/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912136	Fig. 5. Male hind legs. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924, anterior view. B. A. angelicus, posterior view. C. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898, lightest color, anterior view. D. A. subtilior, lightest color, posterior view. E. A. subtilior, anterior view. F. A. subtilior, posterior view. G. A. subtilior, dark, anterior view. H. A. subtilior, dark, posterior view. I. A. texanus Cresson, 1872, anterior view. J. A. texanus, posterior view. K. A. angelicus, basitarsus. L. A. subtilior, basitarsus. M. A. texanus, basitarsus. Scale bars: A–J = 1 mm; K–M = 500 µm.	Fig. 5. Male hind legs. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924, anterior view. B. A. angelicus, posterior view. C. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898, lightest color, anterior view. D. A. subtilior, lightest color, posterior view. E. A. subtilior, anterior view. F. A. subtilior, posterior view. G. A. subtilior, dark, anterior view. H. A. subtilior, dark, posterior view. I. A. texanus Cresson, 1872, anterior view. J. A. texanus, posterior view. K. A. angelicus, basitarsus. L. A. subtilior, basitarsus. M. A. texanus, basitarsus. Scale bars: A–J = 1 mm; K–M = 500 µm.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA37E0638FFF883ECFD87346C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912138/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912138	Fig. 6. Apical view of male genitalia. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898. C. A. texanus Cresson, 1872 s. s. D. A. texanus s. s., zoomed in with black arrow pointing to more evenly curved lower stylus. E. A. subtilior zoomed in with black arrow pointing to more laterally extending lower stylus. Scale bars: 500 µm.	Fig. 6. Apical view of male genitalia. A. Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924. B. A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898. C. A. texanus Cresson, 1872 s. s. D. A. texanus s. s., zoomed in with black arrow pointing to more evenly curved lower stylus. E. A. subtilior zoomed in with black arrow pointing to more laterally extending lower stylus. Scale bars: 500 µm.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA37E0638FFF883ECFD87346C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912144/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912144	Fig. 8. Range maps of specimens examined by the authors. A. Agapostemon texanus Cresson, 1872 s. s. B. Distribution of A. angelicus Cockerell, 1924 in Minnesota. C. Distribution of A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898 in Minnesota. D. Distribution of A. texanus s. s. in Minnesota.	Fig. 8. Range maps of specimens examined by the authors. A. Agapostemon texanus Cresson, 1872 s. s. B. Distribution of A. angelicus Cockerell, 1924 in Minnesota. C. Distribution of A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898 in Minnesota. D. Distribution of A. texanus s. s. in Minnesota.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
9E0DB32AA37E0638FFF883ECFD87346C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13912128/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912128	Fig. 2. Comparison of Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924 and A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898, female head and clypeus. A. A. angelicus, face. B. A. angelicus, apex of clypeus. C. A. subtilior, face. D. A. subtilior, apex of clypeus. Scale bars: A, C = 1 mm; B, D = 500 µm.	Fig. 2. Comparison of Agapostemon angelicus Cockerell, 1924 and A. subtilior Cockerell, 1898, female head and clypeus. A. A. angelicus, face. B. A. angelicus, apex of clypeus. C. A. subtilior, face. D. A. subtilior, apex of clypeus. Scale bars: A, C = 1 mm; B, D = 500 µm.	2024-10-07	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.		Zenodo	biologists	Portman, Zachary M.;Arduser, Mike;Powley, Mary E.;Cariveau, Daniel P.			
