taxonID	type	description	language	source
8C4FA900F529194FFF47606B7C943CBF.taxon	description	Neotype (designated here): – SPAIN. “ Fucus digitatus. Turn. Vs. / Comun [handwritten by Clemente] ” (GDA 45385!), see Fig. 1 [photo avaible in “ Tipos nomenclaturales de algas ” at the Herbarium of the University of Granada website: http: // herbarium. ugr. es / pages / imagenes / tipos-nomenclaturales / algas / _ img / gda 45385 /!]. The specimens have been reviewed by Bellón in 1938 as Phyllaria reniformis, a name now considered to be Phyllariopsis brevipes subsp. brevipes, according to the revision labels with the specimens. This identification corresponds to the review of the algae collection of Clemente by Bellón for the publication of his work “ Las algas de la ‘ Flora Boetica’ inédita, de Clemente ”. In this work (Bellón 1942: 39, 40) confirms the revision of this and other sheets of the HSMS, as well as the identification of Colmeiro (1867: 213), who considered F. digitatus var. pellucidus Clemente as a synonym for Hafgygia digitata var. membranacea Kützing (1843: 346) [which is now a synonym of Laminaria digitata (Hudson) J. V. Lamouroux (1813: 42)]. When the collection was reviewed by Cremades (1990), that author failed to find any specimen belonging to this taxon in the herbarium of the Royal Botanic Garden of Madrid (MA – Algae), and following the indications of Bellón (1940) about the existence of three specimens which Clemente has identified as F. digitatus included in the HSMS, checked them and selected a neotype, without publishing it. The three specimens all lack varietal epithets. However, it is known that Clemente did not describe any other variety of F. digitatus. Thus Cremades selected the fertile specimen (with a large sorus at its base) as the neotype because it closely fit the protologue (Cremades, 1990). The review label of the Royal Botanic Garden of Madrid, handwritten by Cremades in 1990, reads “ Phyllariopsis brevipes (C. Agardh) Henry & South / NEOTYPUS of Fucus digitatus var. pellucidus Clemente / ex Colmeiro 1867: 213 ”.	en	Vizoso, M. Teresa, Cremades, Javier (2016): Typification of algae described by Simón de Rojas Clemente y Rubio deposited at the Herbarium of the University of Granada (Spain). Phytotaxa 275 (1): 45-54, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.275.1.5, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.275.1.5
8C4FA900F52F194FFF4764D7792C3937.taxon	description	Lectotype (designated here): – SPAIN. “ Fucus tomentosus. vs. fastigiatus. nova / En Málaga arraygado en el fango del muelle ” [handwritten by Clemente]. (GDA 45400!), see Fig. 2 [photo avaible in “ Tipos nomenclaturales de algas ” at the Herbarium of the University of Granada website: http: // herbarium. ugr. es / pages / imagenes / tipos-nomenclaturales / algas / _ img / gda 45400 /!]. The sheet contains a review label of the Royal Botanic Garden Madrid, stating that it was reviewed by Cremades in 1990. It reads “ El ejemplar superior es el LECTOTYPUS de Fucus tomentosus Hudson var. fastigiatus Clemente ex Bellón (1942: 11) ” designating the lectotype in his unpublished doctoral thesis, thus is not validly published. He chooses the top specimen as lectotype (Cremades 1990: 184), “ for being the most complete, developed, and more fastigiated habit ”.	en	Vizoso, M. Teresa, Cremades, Javier (2016): Typification of algae described by Simón de Rojas Clemente y Rubio deposited at the Herbarium of the University of Granada (Spain). Phytotaxa 275 (1): 45-54, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.275.1.5, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.275.1.5
