identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
8C4FA900F529194FFF47606B7C943CBF.text	8C4FA900F529194FFF47606B7C943CBF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Fucus digitatus var. pellucidus Clemente ex Colmeiro 1867	<div><p>Fucus digitatus var. pellucidus Clemente ex Colmeiro (1867: 213)</p> <p>= Laminaria reniformis J.V. Lamouroux (1813: 22) [≡ Phyllaria reniformis (J.V. Lamouroux) Rostafinsky in Bornet (1892: 250)].</p> <p>= Laminaria brevipes C. Agardh (1821: 116). [≡ Phyllariopsis brevipes (C. Agardh) E.C. Henry &amp; G.R. South (1987: 13) subsp. brevipes J.L. Pérez-Cirera et al. (1991: 4)].</p> <p>Ind. loc.: “Clem. loc. cit. Málaga (Clem.)” (Colmeiro 1867: 213). “Copiose ad Málaga.” [Transcript of the XXVII card [no number] of “ Flora Boetica ” unpublished, Clemente (Bellón 1942: 6)].</p> <p>Neotype (designated here):– SPAIN. “ Fucus digitatus. Turn. Vs./ Comun [handwritten by Clemente]” (GDA 45385!), see Fig. 1 [photo avaible in “ Tipos nomenclaturales de algas ” at the Herbarium of the University of Granada website: http://herbarium.ugr.es/pages/imagenes/tipos-nomenclaturales/algas/_img/gda45385/!].</p> <p>The specimens have been reviewed by Bellón in 1938 as Phyllaria reniformis, a name now considered to be Phyllariopsis brevipes subsp. brevipes, according to the revision labels with the specimens. This identification corresponds to the review of the algae collection of Clemente by Bellón for the publication of his work “ Las algas de la ‘Flora Boetica’ inédita, de Clemente ”. In this work (Bellón 1942: 39, 40) confirms the revision of this and other sheets of the HSMS, as well as the identification of Colmeiro (1867: 213), who considered F. digitatus var. pellucidus Clemente as a synonym for Hafgygia digitata var. membranacea Kützing (1843: 346) [which is now a synonym of Laminaria digitata (Hudson) J.V. Lamouroux (1813: 42)].</p> <p>When the collection was reviewed by Cremades (1990), that author failed to find any specimen belonging to this taxon in the herbarium of the Royal Botanic Garden of Madrid (MA–Algae), and following the indications of Bellón (1940) about the existence of three specimens which Clemente has identified as F. digitatus included in the HSMS, checked them and selected a neotype, without publishing it. The three specimens all lack varietal epithets. However, it is known that Clemente did not describe any other variety of F. digitatus. Thus Cremades selected the fertile specimen (with a large sorus at its base) as the neotype because it closely fit the protologue (Cremades, 1990). The review label of the Royal Botanic Garden of Madrid, handwritten by Cremades in 1990, reads “ Phyllariopsis brevipes (C. Agardh) Henry &amp; South / NEOTYPUS of Fucus digitatus var. pellucidus Clemente / ex Colmeiro 1867: 213 ”.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8C4FA900F529194FFF47606B7C943CBF	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vizoso, M. Teresa;Cremades, Javier	Vizoso, M. Teresa, Cremades, Javier (2016): Typification of algae described by Simón de Rojas Clemente y Rubio deposited at the Herbarium of the University of Granada (Spain). Phytotaxa 275 (1): 45-54, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.275.1.5, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.275.1.5
8C4FA900F52F194FFF4764D7792C3937.text	8C4FA900F52F194FFF4764D7792C3937.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Fucus tomentosus var. fastigiatus Clemente ex Bellon 1942	<div><p>Fucus tomentosus var. fastigiatus Clemente ex Bellón (1942: 11)</p> <p>= Codium vermilara (Olivi) Delle Chiaje (1829: 14) [≡ Lamarckia vermilara Olivi (1792: 258)].</p> <p>Ind. loc.: In Schedae, LXXX card [no number] “ Fucus tomentosus. v. fastigiatus. mi. | Differt à F. tomentoso a dichotomits creberrimis. praesertim versus | apices, diametro ra-morum 3-plo minori, lineam nempe vix superanti, co-| lore in sicco fere atro. | Obs. Utriusque superficies tuberculis obscurioribus, ut apparet seminiferis. | tota fere cooperta interdum observatur. Tubercula ad microscopium pe-| dicellata.” Overleaf: “Frequens ad littus malaccitanum in limo.” (Bellón 1942: 11).</p> <p>Lectotype (designated here):– SPAIN. “ Fucus tomentosus. vs. fastigiatus. nova/ En Málaga arraygado en el fango del muelle” [handwritten by Clemente]. (GDA 45400!), see Fig. 2 [photo avaible in “ Tipos nomenclaturales de algas ” at the Herbarium of the University of Granada website: http://herbarium.ugr.es/pages/imagenes/tipos-nomenclaturales/ algas/_img/gda45400/!].</p> <p>The sheet contains a review label of the Royal Botanic Garden Madrid, stating that it was reviewed by Cremades in 1990. It reads “El ejemplar superior es el LECTOTYPUS de Fucus tomentosus Hudson var. fastigiatus Clemente ex Bellón (1942: 11) ” designating the lectotype in his unpublished doctoral thesis, thus is not validly published. He chooses the top specimen as lectotype (Cremades 1990: 184), “for being the most complete, developed, and more fastigiated habit”.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8C4FA900F52F194FFF4764D7792C3937	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vizoso, M. Teresa;Cremades, Javier	Vizoso, M. Teresa, Cremades, Javier (2016): Typification of algae described by Simón de Rojas Clemente y Rubio deposited at the Herbarium of the University of Granada (Spain). Phytotaxa 275 (1): 45-54, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.275.1.5, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.275.1.5
