identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
840287AEED30A534FE15F88795A90832.text	840287AEED30A534FE15F88795A90832.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Diptilomiopus indogangeticus Chakrabarti & Sur & Sarkar 2019	<div><p>Diptilomiopus indogangeticus n. sp.</p> <p>(Figures 1, 2)</p> <p>Diptilomiopus ficivorus Sarkar, 2011: 120. Invalid name, a thesis name.</p> <p>Zoobank: 5F402A24-ED4A-49FF-AFDD-7AB6C7CB6878</p> <p>Description</p> <p>Female (n=15) — Live colour brown. Body fusiform, 145 (140–151), 67 (66–67) wide. Gnathosoma: 39 (38–39), abruptly curved down, palp setae d 6 (5–6), palp setae ep 3 (2–3). Prodorsal shield: 22 (22–24), 44 (44–46) wide, with complete network of cells composed of one central cell and a row of 12 cells on the anterior margin, a row of 7 cells on the posterior margin and in between these two rows another 6 cells; scapular tubercles 2 (2–3) and located ahead of shield margin; scapular setae sc absent. Leg I: 23 (23–24), femur 17 (16–17), femoral setae bv absent; genu absent; tibia 6 (5–6), tibial setae l′ absent; tarsus 6 (5–6), tarsal setae</p> <p>ft′ 30 (29–30), tarsal setae ft″ 29 (29–31), setae u′ 2 (2–3); empodium em 10 (10–11), deeply divided, each branch 6-rayed, solenidion ω 9 (9–10), knobbed. Leg II: 21 (20–21), femur 13 (13–14), femoral setae bv absent; genu absent; tibia 4 (4–5), tibial setae l′ absent; tarsus 5 (5–6), tarsal setae ft′ 25 (25–27), tarsal setae ft″ absent, setae u′ 2 (2–3); empodium em 10 (10–11), deeply divided, each branch 6-rayed, solenidion ω 9 (9–10), knobbed. Coxae I: 14 (14–15), with granules, sternal line present; setae 1b absent; setae 1a 21 (21–22) and 8 (8–9) apart; coxae II: 14 (14–15), with granules as in coxae I, setae 2a 31 (30–31) and 15 (15–16) apart, setae 1a located little ahead of 2a. Opisthosoma: Dorsal annuli 64 (64–66) with two pairs</p> <p>of lateral ridges; ventral annuli 62 (60–63), with small, roundish microtubercles, last 8 (7–8) ventral annuli with elongated and linear microtubercles; setae c2 absent; setae d 12 (10–12)</p> <p>on ventral annulus 20; setae e 15 (14–15) on ventral annulus 32; setae f 19 (19–21) on ventral annulus 49; setae h1 absent, setae h2 32 (30–32). Genital coverflap: 16 (16–17), 22 (22–23) wide, with granules present on the basal part, setae 3a 7 (7–8). Internal genitalia: Apodeme short, spermathecae rounded with short funnel-like spermathecal tubes.</p> <p>Male — Not found.</p> <p>Etymology — The specific epithet is masculine in gender and indogangeticus ‘ ’ is derived from the locality of collections of infesting plants occurring Indo-Gangetic plane on the southern side of the River Ganges in Murshidabad district, West Bengal.</p> <p>Type material — Holotype (circled): female (slide no. 1825/98/2016), 07 Aug. 2016, Chunakhali (24˚07′44″N, 88˚17′40″E, alt. 20 m a.s.l.), Murshidabad, West Bengal, India, from Ficus tinctoria subsp. gibbosa (Blume) Corner (Moraceae), coll. S. Sur. Paratypes: 2 females and 4 nymphs in the slide bearing the holotype and 15 females (slide no. 1826-1828/98/2016), collection data as in the holotype.</p> <p>Additional specimens: 7 females and 9 nymphs (slide no. 1392/72/2006), 14 Oct. 2006, Amriti (24˚20′38″N, 87˚05′29″E, alt. 30 m a.s.l.), Malda, West Bengal from the same host plant, coll. S. Sarkar.</p> <p>Relation to the host plant — Mites are vagrant on lower surface of leaves showing no apparent damage symptoms.</p> <p>Differential diagnosis — Diptilomiopus indogangeticus n. sp. shows many similarities with D. cayratus Cheng et al., 2012; D. euscaphiae Wang et al., 2009; D. lithocarpi Wang et al., 2009; D. ligustri Wang et al., 2009 and D. terstroemiae Wang et al., 2009 in having reticulated cellular network on prodorsal shield along with scapular tubercles and presence of palp setae d and ep. However, D. indogangeticus n. sp. can be separated from the above mentioned species by the absence of h1 setae and having 6-rayed empodium. The above Diptilomiopus species are very close and can be separated by the following key.</p> <p>Remarks — The name Diptilomiopus ficivorus appeared previously in the Ph.D thesis by Sarkar (2011) for this species.</p> <p>Key to the closely related species (mentioned in the differential diagnosis) of Diptilomiopus indogangeticus</p> <p>1. Empodium 3-rayed; on Cayratia japonica (Thunb.) Gagnep (Vitaceae)............................................................................. D. cayratus Cheng et al., 2012 — Empodium at least 6-rayed......................................................... 2 2. h1 setae absent; palp setae v lacking; empodium 6-rayed; on Ficus tinctoria subsp. gibbosa (Blume) Corner (Moraceae)...................................... D. indogangeticus n. sp.</p> <p>— h1 setae present; palp setae v present; empodium 7-rayed.............................. 3</p> <p>3. Ventral annuli 62–64; genital coverflap sculptured with only granules; on Lithocarpus glaber (Thunb.) Nakai (Fagaceae)................................ D. lithocarpi Wang et al., 2009 — Ventral annuli at least 77; genital coverflap either with granules and small lines or only sculptured with basal short lines....................................................... 4</p> <p>4. Genital coverflap sculptured with basal short lines, dorsal annuli 60–71; on Ligustrum quihoui Carr. (Oleaceae)..................................... D. ligustri Wang et al., 2009 — Genital coverflap with granules either at base or on whole coverflap region; dorsal annuli either 49–54 or 56–62................................................................ 5</p> <p>5. Prodorsal shield cells arranged in 4 rows and without unpaired central cell; dorsal annuli 49–54; granules present only at basal part of genital coverflap; on Ternstroemia nitida Merr. (Theaceae)............................................. D. terstroemiae Wang et al., 2009 — Prodorsal shield cells arranged in 3 rows and with an unpaired central cell; dorsal annuli 56–62; granules present on whole genital coverflap; on Euscaphis japonica (Thunb.) Kanitz (Staphyleaceae)......................................... D. euscaphiae Wang et al., 2009</p> <p>A further key can separate the Diptilomiopus species associated with plants within the family Moraceae.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/840287AEED30A534FE15F88795A90832	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chakrabarti, Samiran;Sur, Surajit;Sarkar, Sanjay	Chakrabarti, Samiran, Sur, Surajit, Sarkar, Sanjay (2019): Two new species of Diptilomiopus Nalepa (Acari: Eriophyoidea) from India. Acarologia 59 (3): 383-394, DOI: 10.24349/acarologia/20194337, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.24349/acarologia/20194337
840287AEED34A53BFE15F96193620D24.text	840287AEED34A53BFE15F96193620D24.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Diptilomiopus mohanasundarami Chakrabarti & Sur & Sarkar 2019	<div><p>Diptilomiopus mohanasundarami n. sp.</p> <p>(Figures 3, 4)</p> <p>Diptilomiopus mangiferae Sarkar, 2011: 125. Invalid name, a thesis name.</p> <p>Zoobank: http://zoobank.org/act/ 5FCE349F-A4EE-4EC0-9D12-49A3CAFB2DA7</p> <p>Description</p> <p>Female (n=15) — Live colour brown. Body fusiform, 146 (142–157), 74 (74–75) wide. Gnathosoma: 49 (46–49), abruptly curved down, palp setae d 7 (7–8), palp setae ep 3 (2–3). Prodorsal shield: 31 (31–33), 63 (63–64) wide; prodorsal shield with a central cell and a row</p> <p>of 12 cells on the anterior margin, besides, one cell below and one cell lateral to the central cell, other cell architecture on the posterior half of prodorsal shield not distinct; scapular tubercles 2 (2–3) and located ahead of shield margin but scapular setae sc absent. Leg I: 27 (27–29), femur 16 (16–17), femoral setae bv absent; genu absent; tibia 5 (4–5), tibial setae l′ absent; tarsus 6 (5-6), tarsal setae ft′ 39 (38–39), tarsal setae ft″ 38 (38–40), setae u′ 2 (2–3); empodium em 10 (10–12), deeply divided, each branch 6-rayed, solenidion ω 9 (9–10), knobbed. Leg II: 24 (24– 25), femur 14 (14-15), femoral setae bv absent; genu absent; tibia 4 (3–4), tibial setae l′ absent; tarsus 5 (5-6), tarsal setae ft′ 34 (34-35), tarsal setae ft″ absent, setae u′ 2 (2–3); empodium</p> <p>em 10 (10–12), deeply divided, each branch 6-rayed, solenidion ω 9 (9–10), knobbed. Coxae</p> <p>I: 14 (14–15), jointed at base, with granules, sternal line present; setae 1b absent; setae 1a 25 (24–26) and 5 (5–6) apart; coxae II: 13 (13–14), smooth, setae 2a 49 (48–50) and 13 (13–14)</p> <p>apart, setae 1a located little ahead of 2a. Opisthosoma: dorsal annuli 58 (58–60) and little undulated; ventral annuli 53 (52–55), with small, roundish microtubercles till 46 th annuli, last</p> <p>7 (7–8) ventral annuli with elongated and linear microtubercles; setae c2 absent; setae d 12 (11–12) on ventral annulus 16; setae e 10 (10–11) on ventral annulus 27; setae f 18 (17–18) on ventral annulus 42; setae h1 absent, setae h2 32 (32–33). Genital coverflap: 16 (16–17), 22 (22–23) wide, with very few granules on the basal part, setae 3a 9 (9–10). Internal genitalia: Apodeme short, spermathecae rounded with short funnel-like spermathecal tubes.</p> <p>Male — Not found.</p> <p>Etymology — The specific epithet is masculine in gender and derived after the name of Prof. M. Mohanasundaram, eminent Acarologist from India.</p> <p>Type material — Holotype (circled): female (slide no. 1829/174/2017), 13 Jan. 2017, Kalyani (22˚98′56″N, 88˚26′44″E, alt. 11 m a.s.l.), Nadia, West Bengal, India, from Mangifera indica (L.) (Anacardiaceae), coll. S. Sur. Paratypes- 1 female and 2 nymphs in the slide bearing the holotype and 13 females and 8 nymphs (slide no. 1830-1833/174/2017), collection data as</p> <p>in the holotype.</p> <p>Additional specimens: 5 females and 2 nymphs (slide no. 1375/91/2006), 24 Dec. 2006,</p> <p>30 females and 4 nymphs (slide no. 1376-1380/91/2007), 09 Oct. 2007, Amriti (24˚20′38″N, 87˚05′29″E, alt. 30 m a.s.l.), Malda, West Bengal from the same host plant, coll. S. Sarkar.</p> <p>Relation to the host plant — Mites are vagrant on lower surface of leaves showing no apparent damage symptoms.</p> <p>Differential diagnosis — Diptilomiopus mohanasundarami n. sp. shows most similarities with D. cerberae (Chandrapatya, 1998 in Boczek and Chandrapatya 1998) and D. meliae (Boczek, 1998 in Boczek and Chandrapatya 1998) in having incomplete orientation of cells on posterior half of prodorsal shield and 6-rayed empodium. But D. mohanasundarami n. sp. can</p> <p>be separated from the above species in having a total of 15 cells on prodorsal shield (20 cells in D. cerberae and 17 cells in D. meliae).</p> <p>Diptilomiopus mohanasundarami n. sp. remains distinct from D. panithus, another species</p> <p>of Diptilomiopus on Mangifera indica (L.) in having the prodorsal shield with 15 cells; only the coxae I are granulated and the opisthosoma is provided with 58 dorsal annuli and 53 ventral annuli (in D. panithus 16 cells are present on prodorsal shield, both coxae are granulated and the opisthosoma is provided with 43 dorsal annuli and 60 ventral annuli). Apart from this, cellular orientations on the prodorsal shield are totally different. Here, a key is given to separate the Diptilomiopus species on Anacardiaceae.</p> <p>Remarks — The name Diptilomiopus mangiferae appeared previously in the Ph.D thesis by Sarkar (2011) for D. mohanasundarami for this species.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/840287AEED34A53BFE15F96193620D24	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chakrabarti, Samiran;Sur, Surajit;Sarkar, Sanjay	Chakrabarti, Samiran, Sur, Surajit, Sarkar, Sanjay (2019): Two new species of Diptilomiopus Nalepa (Acari: Eriophyoidea) from India. Acarologia 59 (3): 383-394, DOI: 10.24349/acarologia/20194337, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.24349/acarologia/20194337
840287AEED3BA538FE15F84B95EF0877.text	840287AEED3BA538FE15F84B95EF0877.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Diptilomiopus asperis Ghosh and Chakrabarti 1989	<div><p>Diptilomiopus asperis Ghosh and Chakrabarti, 1989</p> <p>Diptilomiopus asperis Ghosh and Chakrabarti, 1989, Indian Journal of Acarology, 11 (1-2):</p> <p>71.</p> <p>Vilaia strebli Boczek, 1992: Boczek and Chandrapatya, 1992, Bull. Pol. Acads. Sci., Biol. Science., 40 (4): 272-273.</p> <p>Diptilomiopus strebli (Boczek, 1992 in Boczek and Chandrapatya, 1992): Hong and Zhang, 1997. Syst. Ent., 22: 323.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/840287AEED3BA538FE15F84B95EF0877	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chakrabarti, Samiran;Sur, Surajit;Sarkar, Sanjay	Chakrabarti, Samiran, Sur, Surajit, Sarkar, Sanjay (2019): Two new species of Diptilomiopus Nalepa (Acari: Eriophyoidea) from India. Acarologia 59 (3): 383-394, DOI: 10.24349/acarologia/20194337, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.24349/acarologia/20194337
840287AEED38A538FE15FDD892A40B9D.text	840287AEED38A538FE15FDD892A40B9D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Diptilomiopus integrifoliae Mohanasundaram 1981	<div><p>Diptilomiopus integrifoliae Mohanasundaram, 1981</p> <p>Diptilomiopus integrifoliae Mohanasundaram, 1981, Oriental insects, 15 (1): 49-51.</p> <p>Diptilomiopus holoptelus Chakrabarti and Mondal, 1983, Acarologia, XXIV (3): 302-303.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/840287AEED38A538FE15FDD892A40B9D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chakrabarti, Samiran;Sur, Surajit;Sarkar, Sanjay	Chakrabarti, Samiran, Sur, Surajit, Sarkar, Sanjay (2019): Two new species of Diptilomiopus Nalepa (Acari: Eriophyoidea) from India. Acarologia 59 (3): 383-394, DOI: 10.24349/acarologia/20194337, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.24349/acarologia/20194337
