identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
2EB5E2E137EC52EC9AB972CB22FDE414.text	2EB5E2E137EC52EC9AB972CB22FDE414.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Amisega boyi Lucena 2021	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Amisega boyi Lucena sp. nov.</p>
            <p>Fig. 2</p>
            <p>Diagnosis.</p>
            <p> Vertex and anterolateral border of pronotum with rugose-striate marks; anterior declivity of pronotum without medial pit; dorsum of propodeum polished; scapal basin punctate-rugulose, vaguely cross-ridged; metasoma with distinct purple highlights; legs brown, lighter on pro- and mesotibiae, and tarsomeres; malar space 1.5  × MOD.  Amisega boyi Lucena, sp. nov. most resembles  A. flavipes Kimsey, 1987 and  A. similis Kimsey, 1987. This new species can be distinguished from both species based on the following combination of characters: rugose marks on vertex and pronotum (lacking rugose marks on vertex in  A. similis , and only striatiform punctures on anterior border of pronotum in  A. flavipes ); scapal basin punctate-rugulose, vaguely cross-ridged medially (entirely cross-ridged in  A. flavipes and  A. similis ); dorsum of propodeum polished and impunctate (dorsum of propodeum smooth and scarcely punctated in  A. flavipes and  A. similis ); sparse punctation on disc of T2, with more than 1PD apart and medial impunctate polished strip clearly defined (disc of T2 densely punctated in  A. similis , and medial impunctate polished strip not defined in  A. flavipes ); and purple highlights on metasoma (blue highlights in  A. similis ). The light brown antenna, mandible, and clypeus, and the anterior declivity of pronotum lacking medial pit also help to distinguish this new species from  A. flavipes (dark brown antenna, mandible, and clypeus, and with well-marked medial pit on anterior border of pronotum); and the greenish blue body coloration contrasts with the light blue pattern of  A. similis . </p>
            <p>Description.</p>
            <p>Holotype, male. Body length: 2.8 mm (Fig. 2A).</p>
            <p> Head: 0.95  × wider than high; toruli barely separated, inner margins slightly produced, forming a short lamellar projection; scape long, cylindrical, slightly wider basally, 3.8  × longer than its maximum width; F1 length 2.2  × breadth, 1.25  × longer than F2, F2 1.15  × longer than F3; F4 0.9  × F3, F5-F10 slightly shorter than F4, F11 acute; lower margin of clypeus evenly round; subantennal distance 0.2  × MOD; malar space 1.5  × MOD; POL 1.6  × OL, 4.3  × OOL; inner ocular margin convergent submedially, LID 0.95  × scape length; eye height 1.75  × breadth. </p>
            <p>Mesosoma: anterior declivity of pronotum lacking medial pit, lobe slightly separated from tegula; scutum notaulus barely distinguishable, impressed only basally (Fig. 2D, E); parapsidal line deeply impressed; M with first abscissa gently curved submedially, diverging before 1cu-a; Rs very short, spectral trace gently curved towards costal wing margin; dorsum of propodeum posteriorly limited by discrete transverse groove.</p>
            <p>Metasoma: lateral margins of T1-T3 sharp, but not carinate; first metasomal segment with ventral keel; posterior margin of S1 concave, posterior margins of S2-S4 nearly straight.</p>
            <p>Coloration: head greenish blue, with greenish highlights on frons, scapal basin, and gena; bluish purple tint on vertex (Fig. 2B); antenna, clypeus, and mandible brown, labrum and mouthparts light brown; mesosoma mainly greenish blue; lateral pronotum, mesopleuron, and metapleuron-propodeum mostly dark brown, extending from half portion to venter, with greenish blue tints on anterior corners; tegula light brown; wing membrane light fuscous, veins brown; legs dark brown, lighter on pro- and mesotibiae and tarsomeres; metasoma mostly brown, with distinct purple highlights on dorsum (e.g., Fig. 2F), venter entirely brown.</p>
            <p>Sculpturing: head regularly punctate, punctures becoming clumped among ocelli and near face; vertex with rugose marks marginally (Fig. 2B); scapal basin somewhat rugulose, vaguely cross-ridged medially, with discrete medial groove extending from dorsal border of torulus to midface (Fig. 2C); gena punctate; malar area and clypeus impunctate; scape punctulate dorsally, with broad basal impunctate area; dorsum of mesosoma without distinct striae, except anterolateral margin of pronotum with rugose-striate marks (Fig. 2B, D); scutum and scutellum punctate, sparser posteriorly on scutellum (e.g., Fig. 2E); mesopleuron contiguously punctate anteriorly, with broad impunctate stripe along posterior margin; metanotum scarcely punctate; propodeum polished on dorsum (e.g., Fig. 2E), posterior declivity with some sparse punctures; anterior border of T1 and most of laterotergite impunctate, marginal punctate stripe running from dorsum to dorsoposterior corner of laterotergite; punctation on disc of T2 more than 1PD apart (e.g., Fig. 2F); T2-T4 contiguously punctate, becoming clumped on laterotergites, posterior borders of terga with impunctate stripes, S2-S4 densely punctate.</p>
            <p>Vestiture: short erect light brown setation on vertex, gena, and frons, with relatively longer and denser setation on occiput; mandible, clypeus and labrum with distinct long gold setation; antenna with short, decumbent, pale setation; eye with sparse microtrichia; dorsum of mesosoma with dense, relatively long, light brown setation; lateral pronotum, posterior border of mesopleuron, dorsum of propodeum, and metapleuron-propodeum, glabrous; wing membrane entirely setose; outer surface of metatibia, and pro- and metafemora, with long dark setae; venter of tarsomeres with abundant irregularly-sized spines; T1-T2 mostly glabrous, except for sparse short setae placed marginally; T3-T5 with marginal stripe of dense long dark setae; S2-S5 abundantly setose.</p>
            <p>Female. Unknown.</p>
            <p>Material examined.</p>
            <p>
                  Holotype: Brazil • ♂; Rio Grande do Norte,  Mossoró , "Faz. Sta.  Júlia” [Fazenda Santa  Júlia ],  
                <a title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -37.38222/lat -5.0194445)" href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-37.38222&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-5.0194445">Malaise</a>
                 1, caatinga; 05°01'10"S, 37°22'56"W; 14.iv.2008; Fernandes, DRR &amp; cols; RPSP. 
            </p>
            <p> •  3♂ paratypes: same data as holotype (1♂ INPA; 2♂ UNILA) . </p>
            <p>Distribution.</p>
            <p> Brazil, RN:  Mossoró . </p>
            <p>Comments.</p>
            <p> The holotype is missing F6-F11 of the left antenna. The metasoma is damaged, with distal segments partly detached and upside down. Two paratypes lack heads, and another paratype has a detached metasoma. This species is only known from  Mossoró , Rio Grande do Norte state (sympatric with  A. sertaneja Lucena, sp. nov., see below), within the semiarid region. All specimens were collected in a Caatinga native vegetation fragment adjacent to a melon crop  Cucumis melo L. (  Cucurbitaceae ) (Fernandes et al. 2014). </p>
            <p>Etymology.</p>
            <p>The new species is named after Daniell Fernandes (Boy), collector of many specimens used in this study.</p>
            <p>Host.</p>
            <p>Unknown.</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2EB5E2E137EC52EC9AB972CB22FDE414	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lucena, Daercio A. A.;Almeida, Eduardo A. B.;Zanella, Fernando C. V.	Lucena, Daercio A. A., Almeida, Eduardo A. B., Zanella, Fernando C. V. (2021): Amiseginae and Cleptinae from northeastern Brazil, with the description of four new species (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 81: 57-85, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.81.60048, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.81.60048
D10F30CACB5656E390E08AA385AE6508.text	D10F30CACB5656E390E08AA385AE6508.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Amisega flavipes Kimsey 1987	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Amisega flavipes Kimsey, 1987</p>
            <p>Fig. 3</p>
            <p> Amisega flavipes Kimsey, 1987: 67. Holotype ♀ (USU: not examined). BRAZIL: Bahia, Encruzilhada. </p>
            <p>Material examined.</p>
            <p>  Brazil • 1♂ paratype; Bahia,  Encruzilhada ; xi.1975; M Alvarenga; BME  •   1♂; Bahia,  Jequié ; i.2016; Antunes RCL; RPSP  . </p>
            <p>Distribution.</p>
            <p> Brazil, BA: Encruzilhada,  Jequié . </p>
            <p>Comments.</p>
            <p> This species can be readily distinguished from other species of the northeastern Brazil by the following combination of characters: scapal basin cross-ridged; dark brown antenna, clypeus, mandible, and metaleg; and lack of distinct striation on vertex and dorsum of mesosoma (Fig. 3C-E). In the original description, Kimsey (1987: 67) cited F1 length 4  × breadth, with the male interpreted as identical. The analyzed specimen from  Jequié-BA has comparatively shorter F1 (length 2.3  × breadth), and a distinct medial pit on anterior declivity of pronotum (not cited in the original description). All other diagnostic characters described for  A. flavipes are identical with this specimen. This species has been recorded in a transition area between Caatinga and Atlantic rainforest. The Encruzilhada county is in the  “Sul-Baiano” highlands, on altitudes above 600 m, with milder climate than usual in the Caatinga (Radambrasil 1983). The new record herein presented for  Jequié is only 207 km north of the previous record, and in spite of having a lower altitude and warmer and drier climate than the type locality, still in the transition zone between the Atlantic rainforest and Caatinga. The taxonomic conclusions about this species are based on the original description and by examination of a male paratype from Bahia: Encruzilhada (BME), and a male recently collected in Bahia:  Jequié (RPSP). </p>
            <p>Host.</p>
            <p>Unknown.</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D10F30CACB5656E390E08AA385AE6508	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lucena, Daercio A. A.;Almeida, Eduardo A. B.;Zanella, Fernando C. V.	Lucena, Daercio A. A., Almeida, Eduardo A. B., Zanella, Fernando C. V. (2021): Amiseginae and Cleptinae from northeastern Brazil, with the description of four new species (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 81: 57-85, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.81.60048, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.81.60048
F50D510B7762584E9E58B052D491F22C.text	F50D510B7762584E9E58B052D491F22C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Amisega sertaneja Lucena 2021	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Amisega sertaneja Lucena sp. nov.</p>
            <p>Figs 4, 5</p>
            <p>Diagnosis.</p>
            <p> Dorsum of head and mesosoma densely striate, with sparse punctures inserted among striae; propodeum with rugose marks, becoming irregularly striate posteriorly, posterior declivity with some sparse punctures; lateral pronotal pit sulci-form; scapal basin transversely cross-ridged; metasoma brown, without blue nor purple highlights; legs light brown; malar space 1.7  × MOD. This new species can be readily distinguished from other species occurring in northeastern Brazil,  Amisega boyi Lucena, sp. nov.,  Amisega flavipes Kimsey, and  A. similis Kimsey, based on densely striate vertex and mesosoma; rugose marks on propodeum; and lack of blue or purple highlights on the metasoma in both genders. Furthermore,  A. sertaneja sp. nov. has the lateral pronotal pit shallow and sulci-form (pit well-marked in  A. flavipes ), and concolorous light brown legs in both sexes (bicolored in  A. similis , and dark brown in males of  A. flavipes ). The extensive transverse striation on dorsum of head and mesosoma also resembles  A. striata Kimsey (Costa Rica). However,  A. sertaneja sp. nov. is readily distinguished from  A. striata by its relatively shorter body (3.1 mm vs. 4 mm), lack of reddish highlights on the legs, brassy tints dorsally on the body, and the entirely dark brown scape (paler ventrally in  A. striata ). </p>
            <p>Description.</p>
            <p>Holotype, male. Body length: 3.1 mm (Fig. 4A).</p>
            <p> Head: 1.2  × higher than broad; toruli barely separated, inner margins slightly produced, forming a short lamellar projection (Fig. 4E); scape long, cylindrical, slightly wider basally, 3.6  × longer than its maximum width; F1 length 3.1  × breadth, 1.3  × longer than F2, F2 1.3  × longer than F3; F4 slightly shorter than F3, F5-F10 subequal, progressively shorter; lower margin of clypeus evenly round; subantennal distance 0.4  × MOD; malar space 1.7  × MOD; OL 1.2  × POL, 7  × OOL; inner ocular margin convergent submedially, LID 1.1  × scape length; eye height 1.4  × breadth. </p>
            <p>Mesosoma: anterior declivity of pronotum with shallow medial pit, lateral pit near pronotal lobe sulci-form, lobe slightly separated from tegula (Fig. 4C); scutum notaulus barely distinguishable, impressed only basally; parapsidal line deeply impressed; M with first abscissa gently curved submedially, diverging at 1cu-a (e.g., Fig. 5F); Rs very short, spectral trace gently curved towards costal wing margin; dorsal surface of propodeum posteriorly limited by discrete transverse groove (Fig. 4I).</p>
            <p>Metasoma: lateral margins of T1-T3 sharp, but not carinate (Fig. 4H); first metasomal segment with discrete ventral keel; posterior margin of S1 concave, posterior margins of S2-S4 nearly straight.</p>
            <p>Coloration: head dark blue, with greenish highlights on frons, scapal basin, and gena; eye, antenna, and mouthparts light brown; distal flagellomeres light brown; mesosoma mainly dark blue, with greenish highlights dorsally; mesopleuron with ventral light brown tint, posterior margin with dark brown stripe; metapleuron-propodeum dark brown with marginal bluish highlights; tegula light brown; wing membrane light fuscous, veins brown; legs brown, darker on metacoxa; metasoma entirely brown (Fig. 4B).</p>
            <p>Sculpturing: frons and vertex heavily striate (Fig. 4G), with sparse punctures inserted among striae; scapal basin densely cross-ridged; gena punctate; clypeus with small punctures on disc, impunctate marginally; scape densely punctulate dorsally, sparser ventrally, with medial polished stripe; dorsum of pronotum, scutum and scutellum densely striate (Fig. 4D, F), with sparse punctures inserted among striae; lateral pronotum with sparse punctures; disc of propleuron impunctate, marginal border with sparse punctures; mesopleuron contiguously punctate, with broad impunctate stripe along posterior margin; disc of metanotum punctate; outer surface of profemur with sparse punctures; dorsum of propodeum with lateral rugose marks (Fig. 4I), becoming irregularly striate marginally, posterior declivity with some sparse punctures; anterior border of T1 and most of laterotergite impunctate and polished, with marginal punctate stripe running from dorsum until dorsoposterior corner of laterotergite; T2-T4, including laterotergites, densely punctate, except by posterior impunctate stripes; S2-S4 densely punctate.</p>
            <p>Vestiture: short sparse pale setation on vertex, gena, and frons, with relatively longer and denser setation on lateral border of face and occiput; mandible, clypeus and labrum with distinct long gold setation; antenna with very short, decumbent, pale setation; eye with sparse microtrichia; dorsum of mesosoma with short sparse light brown setation; lateral pronotum, posterior border of mesopleuron, dorsum of propodeum, and metapleuron-propodeum, glabrous; wing membrane entirely setose; outer surface of metatibia, and pro- and metafemora, with long dark setae; venter of tarsomeres with abundant irregularly-sized spines; T1-T2 mostly glabrous, except for sparse short setae placed marginally; T3-T5 with marginal stripe of long dense dark setae; S2-S5 abundantly setose.</p>
            <p> Female (Fig. 5). Same as male, except: scape 4.4  × longer than its maximum width; F1 length 3.3  × breadth, 1.7  × longer than F2; LID 0.85  × as long as scape; transverse groove on dorsal surface of propodeum barely marked; metasoma dark brown becoming lighter ventrally; T2 with broad impunctate marginal area (Fig. 5C); and denser punctation among striae on dorsum of mesosoma (Fig. 5D, E). </p>
            <p>Material examined.</p>
            <p>
                  Holotype: Brazil • ♂; Rio Grande do Norte,  Mossoró , "Faz. Sta.  Júlia” [Fazenda Santa  Júlia ],  
                <a title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -37.38222/lat -5.0194445)" href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-37.38222&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-5.0194445">Malaise</a>
                 1, caatinga; 05°1'10"S, 37°22'56"W; 14.iv.2008; Fernandes, DRR &amp; cols; RPSP • 9 paratypes same data as holotype (2♂ 1♀ RPSP; 1♂ 1♀ UNILA; 2♂ DZUP; 1♂ 1♀ MZSP) • 3 paratypes, same data as holotype, but collected in 06.iii.2007 (1♀ RPSP; 1♀ 1♂ BME) • 3♂ 1♀ paratypes;  Paraíba , Santa Teresinha, Fazenda  Tamanduá , Ciliar A 1; 05.iv.2010; Messias KDVS leg.; UNILA • 13 paratypes, same data as preceding, except: Reserva B 3; 01.iii.2010; 1♂ UFMG; Reserva B 1; 01.ii.2010; 1♂ UFMG; Reserva 2; 08.iii.2010; 1♂ MPEG 1♂ UFES 1♂ UFPB; Reserva 3; 07.vi.2010; 1♂ INPA; Reserva A 3; 21.iii.2010; 2♀ INPA 2♀ UFPB; Reserva B 3; 18.i.2010; 1♀ UFES; Reserva B 2; 17.v.2010; 1♀ MPEG; Ciliar; 12.vii.2010; Silva JKS leg.; 1♀ DZUP. 
            </p>
            <p>Distribution.</p>
            <p> Brazil, PB: Santa Teresinha; RN:  Mossoró . </p>
            <p>Comments.</p>
            <p> The holotype is missing F10-F11. This species is only known from localities in the core zone of the Caatinga dry region. It is sympatric with  A. boyi Lucena, sp. nov. in  Mossoró-RN , which suggests both species are endemic to Caatinga. All specimens of both new species were collected between January to May, which is the period of most intense rainfall in the region. </p>
            <p>Variation.</p>
            <p> Body size: 2.8-3.0 mm; F1 length 2.6-3.3  × breadth. </p>
            <p>Etymology.</p>
            <p>The name is a Brazilian gentilic adjective for person living in the semiarid region.</p>
            <p>Host.</p>
            <p>Unknown.</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F50D510B7762584E9E58B052D491F22C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lucena, Daercio A. A.;Almeida, Eduardo A. B.;Zanella, Fernando C. V.	Lucena, Daercio A. A., Almeida, Eduardo A. B., Zanella, Fernando C. V. (2021): Amiseginae and Cleptinae from northeastern Brazil, with the description of four new species (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 81: 57-85, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.81.60048, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.81.60048
75D2A0353AB156DFB184BCF6F3F786C3.text	75D2A0353AB156DFB184BCF6F3F786C3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Amisega similis Kimsey 1987	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Amisega similis Kimsey, 1987</p>
            <p> Amisega similis Kimsey 1987: 70. Holotype ♂ (CNC: examined by photos). Brazil: Rio de Janeiro, Guanabara, Represa Rio Grande (presently Rio de Janeiro county). </p>
            <p>Material examined.</p>
            <p> Brazil • 1♂ paratype; Pernambuco, Caruaru; iv.1972; M Alvarenga; USNM . </p>
            <p>Distribution.</p>
            <p>Brazil, BA: Encruzilhada; MG: Pedra Azul; PE: Caruaru; RJ: Rio de Janeiro and Mangaratiba.</p>
            <p>Comments.</p>
            <p> This species can be distinguished from other species of the northeastern Brazil by its bicolored legs, blue highlights on dorsum of metasoma, and lack of striation on vertex and dorsum of mesosoma. Kimsey (1987) cited AEI as the repository of the holotype, which is actually housed at CNC. The previous record for Pernambuco is now clarified as it came from Caruaru county (originally misspelled as  “Carvary” by Kimsey 1987).  Amisega similis is sympatric with  A. flavipes in the  “Sul-baiano” highlands in southern Bahia, and probably also in northern Minas Gerais state, although  A. similis clearly also reaches areas in the Atlantic rainforest in Rio de Janeiro state. Therefore, it is possible that neither species occur in the limits of the Caatinga. </p>
            <p>Host.</p>
            <p>Unknown.</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/75D2A0353AB156DFB184BCF6F3F786C3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lucena, Daercio A. A.;Almeida, Eduardo A. B.;Zanella, Fernando C. V.	Lucena, Daercio A. A., Almeida, Eduardo A. B., Zanella, Fernando C. V. (2021): Amiseginae and Cleptinae from northeastern Brazil, with the description of four new species (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 81: 57-85, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.81.60048, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.81.60048
3C3D3F0A9E4C52DA9AA638769C206B95.text	3C3D3F0A9E4C52DA9AA638769C206B95.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cleptidea nordestina Lucena 2021	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Cleptidea nordestina Lucena sp. nov.</p>
            <p>Fig. 7</p>
            <p>Diagnosis.</p>
            <p> Head bicolored, mostly dark green extending from vertex until upper half of face, mid face to malar area orange; clypeus raised and square-shaped, with lower margin straight; scutum, scutellum and metanotum testaceous; propodeum entirely black, except for the whitish tip of lateral angle.  Cleptidea nordestina sp. nov. most resembles  C. fasciata (Dalman). The new species can be readily distinguished from  C. fasciata by the following combination of unique characteristics: bicolored head, hyaline marks at body (especially trochanters, pronotum, and propodeal angles), clypeus produced, orange metanotum, and entirely black propodeum. </p>
            <p>Description.</p>
            <p>Holotype, female. Body length: 6.7 mm (Fig. 7A).</p>
            <p> Head: 1.2  × wider than high; toruli 0.9  × MOD separated; scape more or less cylindrical, broader apically, 3.4  × longer than its maximum width; F1 length 3.1  × breadth, 3.1  × longer than F2; F2-F10 sub-equal in size, slightly flattened ventrally, F8-F11 excavated ventrally, F11 acute apically, slightly longer than F10; clypeus protruded medially, squared lobe, with lower margin slightly convex; malar space about 0.6  × MOD; ocelli set in compact triangle on vertex, with transverse sulcus linking laterals; posterodorsal border of eye surpassing lateral ocellus dorsal limit; inner ocular margin sub-parallel, slightly convergent above; LID 1.1  × eye height; eye height 1.5  × breadth; OOL 2.3  × OL, 2.6  × POL; frons with short longitudinal sulcus below median ocellus briefly interrupted. </p>
            <p> Mesosoma: pronotum crossed antero- and submedially by transverse crenulate grooves, longitudinal sulcus culminating in a deep fovea posteriorly (Fig. 7H); posterior margin of pronotum slightly elevated, posterolateral lobe touching tegula; scutum with notaulus deeply impressed, parapsidal line discrete, faintly marked; disc of metanotum slightly convex, marginal areas depressed, posterior margin with pair of small medial pits (Fig. 7G); M with first abscissa more or less straight, diverging at 1cu-a; costal cell wider distally, about 2.2  × the maximum width of C; dorsum of metacoxa with distinct longitudinal carina; lateral angle of propodeum short, thumb-like. </p>
            <p>Metasoma: posterior margin of S1 distinctly concave medially; posterior margin of S2-S4 slightly convex.</p>
            <p>Coloration: head basally orange, extending from malar area to mid face, paler basolaterally, metallic dark green hue extending from upper half of face to vertex and gena (Fig. 7B); scape, pedicel and F1-F2 orange; F3-F11 brownish orange, paler ventrally; pronotum predominantly orange, paler on lobe; disc of scutum testaceous, becoming gradually orange laterally (Fig. 7C, D); scutellum and metanotum orange; legs yellowish orange, paler on trochanters and ventrally on coxae; tegula orange; wing membrane dusky-hyaline, with broad brownish band submedially, veins brown; metapleuron-propodeum black, tip of lateral angle of propodeum white; metasoma mostly yellowish orange, T1-T3 with broad dark brown bands (Fig. 7E, F); T4 predominantly yellowish; sterna most yellowish orange, anterior S1 and posteromarginal borders of S2-S3 brown; S4 orange.</p>
            <p>Sculpturing: head heavily sculptured, densely punctate, rugulose-lacunose, particularly on vertex and frons, becoming sparser on gena, and impunctate basally near torulus and clypeus; pronotum, scutum and scutellum mostly rugulose-lacunose, lobe of pronotum impunctate; mesopleuron faintly costate above, punctate to rugulose-lacunose below; metanotum punctate on disk; femora and tibiae sparsely punctate; dorsum of propodeum heavily carinate forming areolate enclosures, posterior declivity longitudinally crossed by three main carinae, somewhat rugulose in-between; T1 nearly impunctate and polished posteromedially, with sparse tiny lateral punctures; T2 sparsely punctate on disk, marginal areas impunctate; T3-T4 densely punctate on disc, with broad impunctate stripes marginally; S1 and S4 nearly impunctate, with sparse marginal punctures; S2-S3 finely punctate on disk becoming sparser marginally.</p>
            <p>Vestiture: head with sparse, long, pale setae on vertex; frons, face, gena and scape with relatively shorter and denser setation; flagellomeres with decumbent dense pale setation; eye with tiny, sparse, sub-erect microtrichia; dorsum of mesosoma with long, sparse, pale setation, longer on venter of mesopleuron; marginal depression of metanotum with patch of pale setae posteriorly; wing membrane entirely setose, with some distinctive, long, erect dark setae inserted proximally; legs with abundant long pale setation, comparatively longer on metaleg; inner surface of tarsi with short, thick setation and short spines irregularly distributed; disc of T1 and T2 glabrous, sparse setation only marginally, T3 and T4 with long dense setae posteriorly, S1 and S4 glabrous, S2 and S3 with long sparse setation; gonapophysis with some erect setae apically.</p>
            <p>Male. Unknown.</p>
            <p>Host. Unknown.</p>
            <p>Material examined.</p>
            <p>  Holotype: Brazil • ♀; Bahia,  Jequié , campus II UESB,  Malaise III; 11.v.2007; Silva-Jr. JC &amp; cols; RPSP. </p>
            <p>Distribution.</p>
            <p> Brazil, BA:  Jequié . </p>
            <p>Comments.</p>
            <p> The holotype is missing distal flagellomeres of the left antenna. The new species is only known from  Jequié , located in a transition zone between Atlantic rainforest and Caatinga (Fig. 8C). Three unidentified male specimens from  Maranhão state (06.vii.1987,  Möericke , UFES; but no collector nor locality data) are also new records of the genus  Cleptidea for northeastern Brazil. These male specimens are poorly preserved (lacking appendices, altered coloration, and their metasomas are collapsed); thus, we could not assign them to  C. nordestina sp. nov. confidently or to interpret them as representing yet another new species. </p>
            <p>Etymology.</p>
            <p>The name refers to the region where the new species was collected, and it is a Brazilian gentile adjective for a person native from the northeastern region.</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3C3D3F0A9E4C52DA9AA638769C206B95	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lucena, Daercio A. A.;Almeida, Eduardo A. B.;Zanella, Fernando C. V.	Lucena, Daercio A. A., Almeida, Eduardo A. B., Zanella, Fernando C. V. (2021): Amiseginae and Cleptinae from northeastern Brazil, with the description of four new species (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 81: 57-85, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.81.60048, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.81.60048
E3BAD0216D1A5562813C3C7B8DB0EF8D.text	E3BAD0216D1A5562813C3C7B8DB0EF8D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Duckeia dudui Lucena 2021	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Duckeia dudui Lucena sp. nov.</p>
            <p>Fig. 6</p>
            <p>Diagnosis.</p>
            <p> Body short, stocky build, not compressed laterally; posterior margin of eye lacking carina; upper gena slightly produced; malar space about half eye height; antennae brown, lighter on distal flagellomeres; legs light brown, becoming yellow in tarsomeres; metasoma with dense appressed punctation on marginal borders; dorsum of metasoma with distinct blue highlights.  Duckeia dudui sp. nov. closely resembles  D. gracile Kimsey, 1987. The new species differs from  D. gracile by the following combination of characters: elongated head, 1.3  × higher than broad (0.9  × higher than broad in  D. gracile ); long malar space, about half of eye height (one third eye height in  D. gracile ); light brown legs (darker in  D. gracile ); short, sparse pale setation on dorsum of meso- and metasoma (relatively longer and denser setation on dorsum of meso- and metasoma in  D. gracile ); marginal borders of T1-T2 with contiguous punctures (punctation on marginal borders of T1-T2 more than 0.5-1.0 PD in  D. gracile ); dorsum of metasoma with distinct bluish highlights marginally on terga (only T2 with faint bluish tint in  D. gracile ). Furthermore,  D. dudui sp. nov. has a stocky built and relatively short body, contrasting with the laterally compressed and relatively elongated body of  D. gracile . </p>
            <p>Description.</p>
            <p>Holotype, female. Body length: 3.4 mm (Fig. 6A).</p>
            <p> Head: pyriform, 1.3  × higher than broad (Fig. 6B); inner margins of toruli produced, touching medially, forming a short lamellar projection; scape long, cylindrical, slightly wider basally, 4.7  × longer than its maximum width; F1 length 2.7  × breadth, 2.2  × longer than F2, F2 1.6  × longer than F3; F4 as long as F2; F3 as long as F5, F5-F10 sub-equal in size, F11 acute apically, slightly longer than F10, F4-F10 slightly flattened ventrally; lower margin of clypeus nearly straight; subantennal distance about 0.5  × MOD; malar space 0.4  × eye height; OL 1.7  × POL, 4  × OOL; inner ocular margin distinctly convergent above, LID 0.9  × shorter than F1; eye height 1.3  × breadth; posterior border of eye slightly elevated, lacking carina or crest; upper gena slightly produced; occiput with pair of shallow foveae (e.g., Fig. 6D). </p>
            <p> Mesosoma: pronotum with discrete medial longitudinal sulcus, posterior margin not elevated upon scutum, lateral and posterior pronotal pits well-marked, lobe separated from tegula by about 0.7  × tegular diameter (Fig. 6E); scutum with notaulus deeply impressed, strongly convergent posteriorly (Fig. 6C); parapsidal line stronger posteriorly, faintly marked anteriorly; M with first abscissa slightly curved submedially, diverging at 1cu-a (e.g., Fig. 6J); stigma somewhat round, longer than first abscissa of M; Rs short, fading gradually, spectral trace curved towards costal wing margin; outer posterior margin of procoxa carinate; lateral margin of propodeum carinate. </p>
            <p>Metasoma: lateral margins of T1-T2 carinate (Fig. 6I), T3 with faintly produced anterolateral carina; S1 with ventral keel; posterior margin concave, posterior margins of S2-S4 slightly convex.</p>
            <p>Coloration: head dark brown green, with green highlights on frons, vertex and gena, darker basally at malar area; mouthparts light brown; antenna brown, lighter on pedicel and distal flagellomeres; mesosoma dark green brownish, with bluish purple tints dorsally on propodeum; mesopleuron with ventral and posterior light brown stripe; tegula light brown; wing membrane slightly pale to subhyaline, veins brown; legs light brown, becoming yellowish on tibiae and tarsomeres; metasoma dark brown, metallic blue highlights on dorsum, becoming greenish marginally on T3-T4; disc of T1 and T2 brownish; sterna mostly dark brown, except for marginal bluish highlights on S2.</p>
            <p>Sculpturing: head contiguously punctate (Fig. 6B, F); clypeus impunctate; scapal basin densely cross-ridged; scape punctulate dorsally, venter slightly excavated and polished; pronotum, scutum, and scutellum densely punctate (Fig. 6C), punctures comparatively deeper and larger on metanotum; anterior border of pronotum with distinct medial pit, lateral margins with shallower pits, latero-posterior border with hyaline impunctate stripe; propleuron widely impunctate on disc, lateral margins densely punctate; mesopleuron contiguously punctate, with narrow impunctate stripe along posterior margin; outer surface of coxae and femora with shallow and sparse punctation; propodeum densely punctate, except by lateral polished areas beside to the metapostnotal median carina; metasoma densely punctate (Fig. 6G-I), with narrow posterior impunctate stripes on T1-T3; medial line of S2-S3 finely punctulate.</p>
            <p>Vestiture: sparse long golden pale setation on vertex, gena and clypeus, frons and face with relatively shorter and sparser setation; flagellomeres with decumbent dense pale setation, sparser and longer on scape and pedicel; eye with sparse microtrichia on upper border; mesosoma setose, except glabrous disc of metapleuron-propodeum; mesosomal dorsum with sparse, pale setation, longer on metanotum; mesopleuron with long dense pale setation, becoming longer ventrally; wing membrane entirely setose (e.g., Fig. 6J); legs with pale setation, comparatively longer on pro- and metafemora, and meso- and metatibiae; tarsomeres with short, condensed, spine-like, yellow setation; disc of T1 and T2 glabrous, sparse setation marginally, and on laterotergites; T3 and T4 comparatively with longer setation, denser posteriorly, and on laterotergites; S2-S4 entirely setose.</p>
            <p>Male. Unknown.</p>
            <p>Material examined.</p>
            <p>
                  Holotype: Brazil • ♀; Rio Grande do Norte,  
                <a title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -37.616665/lat -6.1)" href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-37.616665&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-6.1">Patu</a>
                 , "caatinga-arm. Malaise" [Malaise trap in caatinga]; 06°06'S, 37°37'W; ix.2008; DRR Fernandes &amp; colls; RPSP • 4 paratypes, same data as holotype (1♀ MZSP, 1♀ DZUP 1 specimen RPSP, 1 specimen UNILA-the latter two could not have their gender determined as detailed in the Comments below). 
            </p>
            <p>Distribution.</p>
            <p>Brazil, RN: Patu.</p>
            <p>Comments.</p>
            <p>The holotype is missing part of left metaleg. Two paratypes are poorly conserved, lacking antennae, legs and metasoma, thus, preventing gender determination. This species is only known from Patu county. Specimens were collected in the base of "Serra do Lima" (inselberg), 248 m above sea level (Fernandes et al. 2020), in the core zone of the Caatinga dry region. Interestingly, the specimens were collected in November, which is characterized as part of the dry season in the region.</p>
            <p>Etymology.</p>
            <p> The species is named after  Sebastião Antônio de  Araújo , Dudu (in memoriam), grandfather of the first author. </p>
            <p>Host.</p>
            <p>Unknown.</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E3BAD0216D1A5562813C3C7B8DB0EF8D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Lucena, Daercio A. A.;Almeida, Eduardo A. B.;Zanella, Fernando C. V.	Lucena, Daercio A. A., Almeida, Eduardo A. B., Zanella, Fernando C. V. (2021): Amiseginae and Cleptinae from northeastern Brazil, with the description of four new species (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 81: 57-85, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.81.60048, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.81.60048
