taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
3AE3B61B1D1E5CD581E4F2852E6F0B36.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1329767	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.117.154573.figure2	Figure 2. Camporesiomyces bhatii (GMB-W 1176, holotype) a, b colonies on the natural substrate c, d conidiophore with conidia and conidiogenous cells e, f conidiogenous cells g – m conidia n a germinated conidium o, p Culture on PDA from above and reverse. Scale bars: 50 μm (c); 20 μm (d); 10 μm (e, g – n); 5 μm (f).	Figure 2. Camporesiomyces bhatii (GMB-W 1176, holotype) a, b colonies on the natural substrate c, d conidiophore with conidia and conidiogenous cells e, f conidiogenous cells g – m conidia n a germinated conidium o, p Culture on PDA from above and reverse. Scale bars: 50 μm (c); 20 μm (d); 10 μm (e, g – n); 5 μm (f).	2025-05-14	Han, Mei-Yan;Karunarathna, Samantha C.;Lu, Li;Zheng, De-Ge;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Dai, Dong-Qin;Zhang, Li-Juan;Zhao, Wan-Tong;Chukeatirote, Ekachai;Tibpromma, Saowaluck		Zenodo	biologists	Han, Mei-Yan;Karunarathna, Samantha C.;Lu, Li;Zheng, De-Ge;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Dai, Dong-Qin;Zhang, Li-Juan;Zhao, Wan-Tong;Chukeatirote, Ekachai;Tibpromma, Saowaluck			
3AE3B61B1D1E5CD581E4F2852E6F0B36.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1329766	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.117.154573.figure1	Figure 1. The ML analysis and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses yielded nearly identical tree topologies, with bootstrap support values for ML equal to or greater than 50 %, and BI analysis values equal to or greater than 0.90 PP are provided at each node. Newly generated sequences are in red, while the ex-type strains are in bold.	Figure 1. The ML analysis and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses yielded nearly identical tree topologies, with bootstrap support values for ML equal to or greater than 50 %, and BI analysis values equal to or greater than 0.90 PP are provided at each node. Newly generated sequences are in red, while the ex-type strains are in bold.	2025-05-14	Han, Mei-Yan;Karunarathna, Samantha C.;Lu, Li;Zheng, De-Ge;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Dai, Dong-Qin;Zhang, Li-Juan;Zhao, Wan-Tong;Chukeatirote, Ekachai;Tibpromma, Saowaluck		Zenodo	biologists	Han, Mei-Yan;Karunarathna, Samantha C.;Lu, Li;Zheng, De-Ge;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Dai, Dong-Qin;Zhang, Li-Juan;Zhao, Wan-Tong;Chukeatirote, Ekachai;Tibpromma, Saowaluck			
330382559CC85566B67CA3FC2D18153F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1329768	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.117.154573.figure3	Figure 3. Camporesiomyces coffeae (GMB-W 1181, holotype) a, b colonies on the natural substrate c, d conidiophore and conidiogenous cells e conidiogenous cells f – j conidia k a germinated conidium l, m culture on PDA from above and reverse. Scale bars: 50 μm (c); 20 μm (d); 5 μm (e); 10 μm (f – k).	Figure 3. Camporesiomyces coffeae (GMB-W 1181, holotype) a, b colonies on the natural substrate c, d conidiophore and conidiogenous cells e conidiogenous cells f – j conidia k a germinated conidium l, m culture on PDA from above and reverse. Scale bars: 50 μm (c); 20 μm (d); 5 μm (e); 10 μm (f – k).	2025-05-14	Han, Mei-Yan;Karunarathna, Samantha C.;Lu, Li;Zheng, De-Ge;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Dai, Dong-Qin;Zhang, Li-Juan;Zhao, Wan-Tong;Chukeatirote, Ekachai;Tibpromma, Saowaluck		Zenodo	biologists	Han, Mei-Yan;Karunarathna, Samantha C.;Lu, Li;Zheng, De-Ge;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Dai, Dong-Qin;Zhang, Li-Juan;Zhao, Wan-Tong;Chukeatirote, Ekachai;Tibpromma, Saowaluck			
330382559CC85566B67CA3FC2D18153F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1329766	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.117.154573.figure1	Figure 1. The ML analysis and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses yielded nearly identical tree topologies, with bootstrap support values for ML equal to or greater than 50 %, and BI analysis values equal to or greater than 0.90 PP are provided at each node. Newly generated sequences are in red, while the ex-type strains are in bold.	Figure 1. The ML analysis and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses yielded nearly identical tree topologies, with bootstrap support values for ML equal to or greater than 50 %, and BI analysis values equal to or greater than 0.90 PP are provided at each node. Newly generated sequences are in red, while the ex-type strains are in bold.	2025-05-14	Han, Mei-Yan;Karunarathna, Samantha C.;Lu, Li;Zheng, De-Ge;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Dai, Dong-Qin;Zhang, Li-Juan;Zhao, Wan-Tong;Chukeatirote, Ekachai;Tibpromma, Saowaluck		Zenodo	biologists	Han, Mei-Yan;Karunarathna, Samantha C.;Lu, Li;Zheng, De-Ge;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Dai, Dong-Qin;Zhang, Li-Juan;Zhao, Wan-Tong;Chukeatirote, Ekachai;Tibpromma, Saowaluck			
330382559CC85566B67CA3FC2D18153F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1329769	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.117.154573.figure4	Figure 4. Camporesiomyces puerensis (GMB-W 1121, holotype) a, b colonies on the natural substrate c, d conidiophores and conidiogenous cells e, f conidiogenous cells g – l conidia m a germinated conidium n, o culture on PDA from above and reverse. Scale bars: 50 μm (c); 30 μm (d); 10 μm (e, f); 20 μm (g – m).	Figure 4. Camporesiomyces puerensis (GMB-W 1121, holotype) a, b colonies on the natural substrate c, d conidiophores and conidiogenous cells e, f conidiogenous cells g – l conidia m a germinated conidium n, o culture on PDA from above and reverse. Scale bars: 50 μm (c); 30 μm (d); 10 μm (e, f); 20 μm (g – m).	2025-05-14	Han, Mei-Yan;Karunarathna, Samantha C.;Lu, Li;Zheng, De-Ge;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Dai, Dong-Qin;Zhang, Li-Juan;Zhao, Wan-Tong;Chukeatirote, Ekachai;Tibpromma, Saowaluck		Zenodo	biologists	Han, Mei-Yan;Karunarathna, Samantha C.;Lu, Li;Zheng, De-Ge;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Dai, Dong-Qin;Zhang, Li-Juan;Zhao, Wan-Tong;Chukeatirote, Ekachai;Tibpromma, Saowaluck			
CA44A220C97051C6A7F791970FC49BE2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1329769	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.117.154573.figure4	Figure 4. Camporesiomyces puerensis (GMB-W 1121, holotype) a, b colonies on the natural substrate c, d conidiophores and conidiogenous cells e, f conidiogenous cells g – l conidia m a germinated conidium n, o culture on PDA from above and reverse. Scale bars: 50 μm (c); 30 μm (d); 10 μm (e, f); 20 μm (g – m).	Figure 4. Camporesiomyces puerensis (GMB-W 1121, holotype) a, b colonies on the natural substrate c, d conidiophores and conidiogenous cells e, f conidiogenous cells g – l conidia m a germinated conidium n, o culture on PDA from above and reverse. Scale bars: 50 μm (c); 30 μm (d); 10 μm (e, f); 20 μm (g – m).	2025-05-14	Han, Mei-Yan;Karunarathna, Samantha C.;Lu, Li;Zheng, De-Ge;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Dai, Dong-Qin;Zhang, Li-Juan;Zhao, Wan-Tong;Chukeatirote, Ekachai;Tibpromma, Saowaluck		Zenodo	biologists	Han, Mei-Yan;Karunarathna, Samantha C.;Lu, Li;Zheng, De-Ge;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Dai, Dong-Qin;Zhang, Li-Juan;Zhao, Wan-Tong;Chukeatirote, Ekachai;Tibpromma, Saowaluck			
CA44A220C97051C6A7F791970FC49BE2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1329766	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.117.154573.figure1	Figure 1. The ML analysis and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses yielded nearly identical tree topologies, with bootstrap support values for ML equal to or greater than 50 %, and BI analysis values equal to or greater than 0.90 PP are provided at each node. Newly generated sequences are in red, while the ex-type strains are in bold.	Figure 1. The ML analysis and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses yielded nearly identical tree topologies, with bootstrap support values for ML equal to or greater than 50 %, and BI analysis values equal to or greater than 0.90 PP are provided at each node. Newly generated sequences are in red, while the ex-type strains are in bold.	2025-05-14	Han, Mei-Yan;Karunarathna, Samantha C.;Lu, Li;Zheng, De-Ge;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Dai, Dong-Qin;Zhang, Li-Juan;Zhao, Wan-Tong;Chukeatirote, Ekachai;Tibpromma, Saowaluck		Zenodo	biologists	Han, Mei-Yan;Karunarathna, Samantha C.;Lu, Li;Zheng, De-Ge;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Dai, Dong-Qin;Zhang, Li-Juan;Zhao, Wan-Tong;Chukeatirote, Ekachai;Tibpromma, Saowaluck			
CA44A220C97051C6A7F791970FC49BE2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1329768	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.117.154573.figure3	Figure 3. Camporesiomyces coffeae (GMB-W 1181, holotype) a, b colonies on the natural substrate c, d conidiophore and conidiogenous cells e conidiogenous cells f – j conidia k a germinated conidium l, m culture on PDA from above and reverse. Scale bars: 50 μm (c); 20 μm (d); 5 μm (e); 10 μm (f – k).	Figure 3. Camporesiomyces coffeae (GMB-W 1181, holotype) a, b colonies on the natural substrate c, d conidiophore and conidiogenous cells e conidiogenous cells f – j conidia k a germinated conidium l, m culture on PDA from above and reverse. Scale bars: 50 μm (c); 20 μm (d); 5 μm (e); 10 μm (f – k).	2025-05-14	Han, Mei-Yan;Karunarathna, Samantha C.;Lu, Li;Zheng, De-Ge;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Dai, Dong-Qin;Zhang, Li-Juan;Zhao, Wan-Tong;Chukeatirote, Ekachai;Tibpromma, Saowaluck		Zenodo	biologists	Han, Mei-Yan;Karunarathna, Samantha C.;Lu, Li;Zheng, De-Ge;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Elgorban, Abdallah M.;Dai, Dong-Qin;Zhang, Li-Juan;Zhao, Wan-Tong;Chukeatirote, Ekachai;Tibpromma, Saowaluck			
