taxonID	type	description	language	source
7F387078B95EFFCEB563F10933173525.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Idiosomal setal pattern 10 A: 8 C / JV – 3: ZV (r 3 and R 1 off shield). Dorsal shield sclerotized, mostly striated; with slight waist at level of R 1; with five pairs of solenostomes (gd 1, gd 2, gd 6, gd 8, and gd 9); dorsal setae serrated except j 4, j 5, j 6, J 2, z 5 and Z 1 smooth. Peritremes extending between setae j 3 - z 2. All ventral shields smooth, except ventrianal shield with a few posterior striations; sternal shield with three pairs of setae; ventrianal shield elongated, with three pairs of preanal setae and a pair of minute preanal solenostomes located posteromesad to setae JV 2; seta JV 5 serrated. Spermatheca with short, cup-shaped calyx and nodular atrium, attached to calyx without neck. Fixed digit of chelicera with three subapical teeth and movable digit without tooth. Leg IV with one serrated macroseta. Genu II and IV each with eight (2 2 / 1 2 / 0 1) setae and tibia IV with seven setae (1 1 / 1 2 / 0 2).	en	Döker, İsmail, Ozman-Sullivan, Sebahat K., Sullivan, Gregory T., Adana, Abstract, Türkiye I Türkiye (2024): A complementary description of Kampimodromus corylosus Kolodochka (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and a revised key for the genus Kampimodromus Nesbitt. Acarological Studies 6 (2): 65-71, DOI: 10.47121/acarolstud.1500227, URL: https://doi.org/10.47121/acarolstud.1500227
7F387078B95EFFCEB563F10933173525.taxon	description	Re-description Female (n = 4). Dorsal idiosoma (Fig. 1 A). Dorsal setal pattern 10 A: 8 C (r 3 and R 1 off shield). Dorsal shield mostly striated, with slight waist at level of seta R 1, with five pairs of solenostomes (gd 1, gd 2, gd 6, gd 8 and gd 9). Muscle-marks (sigillae) visible mostly on podosoma; length of dorsal shield 282 (280 – 284), width at level of s 4 160 (156 – 163), width at level of S 2 164 (163 – 165). Dorsal setae serrated, except j 4, j 5, j 6, J 2, z 5 and Z 1 smooth. Measurements of dorsal setae as follows: j 1 20 (18 – 21), j 3 27 (25 – 30), j 4 15 (13 – 17), j 5 14 (12 – 15), j 6 16 (14 – 18), J 2 20 (17 – 23), J 5 8 (6 – 9), z 2 25 (24 – 26), z 4 34 (32 – 37), z 5 16 (14 – 18), Z 1 21 (18 – 24), Z 4 40 (37 – 43), Z 5 52 (49 – 55), s 4 43 (38 – 47), S 2 44 (40 – 48), S 5 18 (17 – 20), r 3 40 (38 – 42), and R 1 25 (23 – 27). Peritremes extending between setae j 3 - z 2. Ventral idiosoma (Fig. 1 B). Ventral setal pattern 14: JV – 3: ZV. Sternal shield smooth, with three pairs of setae (ST 1 – ST 3) and two pairs of poroids (iv 1, iv 2); distance between bases of setae ST 1 – ST 3 59 (56 – 61), distance between bases of setae ST 2 56 (55 – 58); metasternal setae ST 4 and poroids iv 3 on metasternal shields. Genital shield smooth with one pair of setae ST 5; width at level of ST 5 49 (48 – 50); one pair of para-genital poroids iv 5 on soft cuticle. Ventrianal shield elongate, mostly smooth except for some posterior striations, with three pairs of pre-anal setae (JV 1, JV 2, and ZV 2), one pair of para-anal setae PA, unpaired post-anal seta PST, and a pair of minute solenostomes (gv 3) posteromedian to JV 2. Length of ventrianal shield 92 (89 – 94), width at level of ZV 2 54 (50 – 58). Four pairs of caudoventral setae (ZV 1, ZV 3, JV 4 and JV 5) and six pairs of poroids (five ivo and ivp) on soft cuticle surrounding ventrianal shield. Setae JV 5 serrated, 35 (34 – 35) in length. Chelicera (Fig. 1 C). Fixed digit 24 (23 – 25) long, with three teeth clustered sub-apically and pilus dentilis; movable digit 24 (23 – 25) long, without tooth. Spermatheca (Fig. 1 D). Calyx short, cup-shaped, 8 (6 – 10) long, atrium nodular, connected to calyx without neck, major duct long, narrow, minor duct visible. Legs (Figs 2 A-D). Leg I 262 (260 – 264), II 209 (205 – 213), III 195 (190 – 200), IV 279 (265 – 286) in length. Chaetotaxy of legs as follows: Leg I: coxa 0 0 / 1 0 / 1 0, trochanter 1 0 / 1 0 / 2 1, femur 2 3 / 1 2 / 2 2, genu 2 2 / 1 2 / 1 2, tibia 2 2 / 1 2 / 1 2. Leg II: coxa 0 0 / 1 0 / 1 0, trochanter 1 0 / 1 0 / 2 1, femur 2 3 / 1 2 / 1 1, genu 2 2 / 1 2 / 0 1, tibia 1 1 / 1 2 / 1 1. Leg III: coxa 0 0 / 1 0 / 1 0, trochanter 1 1 / 1 0 / 2 0, femur 1 2 / 1 1 / 0 1, genu 1 2 / 1 2 / 0 1, tibia 1 1 / 1 2 / 1 1. Leg IV: coxa 0 0 / 1 0 / 0 0, trochanter 1 1 / 1 0 / 2 0, femur 1 2 / 1 1 / 0 1, genu 2 2 / 1 2 / 0 1, tibia 1 1 / 1 2 / 0 2. Leg IV with one macroseta StIV (pd 3) 22 (21 – 23), usually with two barbs, smooth in one specimen. Other legs without macrosetae. Male. Not collected in this study.	en	Döker, İsmail, Ozman-Sullivan, Sebahat K., Sullivan, Gregory T., Adana, Abstract, Türkiye I Türkiye (2024): A complementary description of Kampimodromus corylosus Kolodochka (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and a revised key for the genus Kampimodromus Nesbitt. Acarological Studies 6 (2): 65-71, DOI: 10.47121/acarolstud.1500227, URL: https://doi.org/10.47121/acarolstud.1500227
7F387078B95EFFCEB563F10933173525.taxon	materials_examined	Material examined. Four females from hazelnut, C. avellana in Gürgenyatak village, Canik, Samsun, Türkiye (41 ° 13 ' 32 " N, 36 ° 21 ' 50 " E, 513 meters above sea level); collected by S. K. Ozman-Sullivan and G. T. Sullivan on 01 October 2021.	en	Döker, İsmail, Ozman-Sullivan, Sebahat K., Sullivan, Gregory T., Adana, Abstract, Türkiye I Türkiye (2024): A complementary description of Kampimodromus corylosus Kolodochka (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and a revised key for the genus Kampimodromus Nesbitt. Acarological Studies 6 (2): 65-71, DOI: 10.47121/acarolstud.1500227, URL: https://doi.org/10.47121/acarolstud.1500227
7F387078B95EFFCEB563F10933173525.taxon	discussion	Discussion. Kampimodromus corylosus was described from specimens mostly collected from hazelnut, C. avellana, in Ukraine and Moldova. The current study reports K. corylosus for the first time from Türkiye. The morphological characters and measurements of the newly collected specimens are almost identical to the original description and redescriptions (Cargnus et al., 2012; Döker et al., 2022). We re-examined the Belgian specimens reported by Döker et al. (2022) and confirm that the measurements of dorsal seta j 3 are not 21 (21 – 22) but 31 (31 – 32). Also, the preanal solenostomes in the Belgian specimens are small and circular, not crescentic, as in the original description and the redescription provided here.	en	Döker, İsmail, Ozman-Sullivan, Sebahat K., Sullivan, Gregory T., Adana, Abstract, Türkiye I Türkiye (2024): A complementary description of Kampimodromus corylosus Kolodochka (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and a revised key for the genus Kampimodromus Nesbitt. Acarological Studies 6 (2): 65-71, DOI: 10.47121/acarolstud.1500227, URL: https://doi.org/10.47121/acarolstud.1500227
7F387078B95FFFCDB563F24333AF32E4.taxon	discussion	The identification key provided in this study for 16 species of Kampimodromus is based on the previous key by Döker et al. (2017). However, in the present study, we resurrected K. adrianae to valid species status and included it in the key due to the distinct differences in its dorsal setal length especially for dorsocentral setae and serrations on j 4, j 5, j 6, J 2, Z 5, Z 1 and S 5. Tixier et al. (2006) suspected that K. adrianae is a junior synonym of K. hmiminai McMurtry and Bounfour, 1989 based on COI sequences from populations collected from Salix canariensis Chr. Sm. ex Link (Salicaceae) in the Canary Islands and Ficus carica L. (Moraceae) in Meknes, Morocco. The same authors stated that the genetic distance between these two species was similar to the distance between two populations of K. aberrans which were collected from Celtis australis L. (Ulmaceae) and Quercus pubescens Willd. (Fagaceae) in Montpellier, France. However, Döker et al. (2018) used four species of Kampimodromus to construct a phylogenetic tree based on their ITS sequences and the sequences available in the GenBank database. The phylogenetic tree of Döker et al. (2018) showed that the sequence, HQ 404798, deposited as K. aberrans, originating from a population collected from C. australis in Montpellier, France is identical to K. corylosus. Therefore, at least one of the two K. aberrans populations identified by Tixier et al. (2006) is likely to be K. corylosus. This situation appears to negate the argument of Tixier et al. (2006) that the genetic difference between K. hmiminai and K. adrianae is the same as that between two populations of K. aberrans. In that light, we propose the reinstatement of K. adrianae as a valid species due to the distinct differences in its dorsal setal lengths, until more accurate morphological and molecular studies, and possibly cross-breeding experiments, are conducted. Revised key to the genus Kampimodromus Nesbitt, 1951 (Modified from Döker et al., 2017)	en	Döker, İsmail, Ozman-Sullivan, Sebahat K., Sullivan, Gregory T., Adana, Abstract, Türkiye I Türkiye (2024): A complementary description of Kampimodromus corylosus Kolodochka (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and a revised key for the genus Kampimodromus Nesbitt. Acarological Studies 6 (2): 65-71, DOI: 10.47121/acarolstud.1500227, URL: https://doi.org/10.47121/acarolstud.1500227
