taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
765787B1FFEDFF97FF09FA52FB395F0B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3548358/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3548358	FIGURES 12–19. FIGURE 12. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Polinices Monfort, 1810 studied herein. FIGURE 13. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 14. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 15. Relationship between the aperture width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 16. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Euspira Agassiz in J. Sowerby, 1837 studied herein. FIGURE 17. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 18. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 19. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Tectonatica Sacco, 1890 studied herein.	FIGURES 12–19. FIGURE 12. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Polinices Monfort, 1810 studied herein. FIGURE 13. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 14. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 15. Relationship between the aperture width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 16. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Euspira Agassiz in J. Sowerby, 1837 studied herein. FIGURE 17. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 18. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 19. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Tectonatica Sacco, 1890 studied herein.	2019-11-19	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno		Zenodo	biologists	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno			
765787B1FFEDFF97FF09FA52FB395F0B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3548360/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3548360	FIGURES 20–22. FIGURE 20. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 21. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the umbilicus width for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 22. Relationship between the width of the abapical sulcus and the width of the adapical sulcus for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein.	FIGURES 20–22. FIGURE 20. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 21. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the umbilicus width for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 22. Relationship between the width of the abapical sulcus and the width of the adapical sulcus for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein.	2019-11-19	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno		Zenodo	biologists	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno			
765787B1FFF7FF8BFF09FC74FB3958F4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3548358/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3548358	FIGURES 12–19. FIGURE 12. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Polinices Monfort, 1810 studied herein. FIGURE 13. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 14. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 15. Relationship between the aperture width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 16. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Euspira Agassiz in J. Sowerby, 1837 studied herein. FIGURE 17. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 18. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 19. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Tectonatica Sacco, 1890 studied herein.	FIGURES 12–19. FIGURE 12. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Polinices Monfort, 1810 studied herein. FIGURE 13. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 14. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 15. Relationship between the aperture width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 16. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Euspira Agassiz in J. Sowerby, 1837 studied herein. FIGURE 17. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 18. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 19. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Tectonatica Sacco, 1890 studied herein.	2019-11-19	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno		Zenodo	biologists	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno			
765787B1FFF5FF8DFF09F9AAFB395DEB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3548368/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3548368	FIGURE 26. Tectonatica pseudoprietoi sp. nov. from the middle Miocene (Upper Badenian) of Ukraine at Varovtsi. 1. Holotype, MPUM 11740; 2. Paratype 1, MZB 32147, teleoconch and protoconch; 3. Paratype 2, ZISP 1/62195; 4. Paratype 3, IGS NANU B-III-6/2018, protoconch.Arrows point to the protoconch-teleoconch transition. Scale bars: 10 mm, except protoconchs (figs 2b, 4: 500 µm).	FIGURE 26. Tectonatica pseudoprietoi sp. nov. from the middle Miocene (Upper Badenian) of Ukraine at Varovtsi. 1. Holotype, MPUM 11740; 2. Paratype 1, MZB 32147, teleoconch and protoconch; 3. Paratype 2, ZISP 1/62195; 4. Paratype 3, IGS NANU B-III-6/2018, protoconch.Arrows point to the protoconch-teleoconch transition. Scale bars: 10 mm, except protoconchs (figs 2b, 4: 500 µm).	2019-11-19	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno		Zenodo	biologists	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno			
765787B1FFF5FF8DFF09F9AAFB395DEB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3548358/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3548358	FIGURES 12–19. FIGURE 12. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Polinices Monfort, 1810 studied herein. FIGURE 13. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 14. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 15. Relationship between the aperture width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 16. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Euspira Agassiz in J. Sowerby, 1837 studied herein. FIGURE 17. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 18. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 19. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Tectonatica Sacco, 1890 studied herein.	FIGURES 12–19. FIGURE 12. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Polinices Monfort, 1810 studied herein. FIGURE 13. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 14. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 15. Relationship between the aperture width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 16. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Euspira Agassiz in J. Sowerby, 1837 studied herein. FIGURE 17. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 18. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 19. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Tectonatica Sacco, 1890 studied herein.	2019-11-19	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno		Zenodo	biologists	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno			
765787B1FFFEFF82FF09FD67FB375E93.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3548354/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3548354	FIGURES 4–11. FIGURE 4. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch diameter in the naticine taxa studied. FIGURE 5. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch diameter in the poliniceine and sinine taxa studied. FIGURE 6. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch whorls in the naticine taxa studied. FIGURE 7. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch whorls in the poliniceine and sinine taxa studied. FIG- URE 8. Relationship between the protoconch diameter/diameter of the first half-whorl ratio and the protoconch whorls in the naticine taxa studied. FIGURE 9. Relationship between the protoconch diameter/diameter of the first half-whorl ratio and the protoconch whorls in the poliniceine and sinine taxa studied. FIGURE 10. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Euspira Agassiz in J. Sowerby, 1837 studied herein. FIGURE 11. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein.	FIGURES 4–11. FIGURE 4. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch diameter in the naticine taxa studied. FIGURE 5. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch diameter in the poliniceine and sinine taxa studied. FIGURE 6. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch whorls in the naticine taxa studied. FIGURE 7. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch whorls in the poliniceine and sinine taxa studied. FIG- URE 8. Relationship between the protoconch diameter/diameter of the first half-whorl ratio and the protoconch whorls in the naticine taxa studied. FIGURE 9. Relationship between the protoconch diameter/diameter of the first half-whorl ratio and the protoconch whorls in the poliniceine and sinine taxa studied. FIGURE 10. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Euspira Agassiz in J. Sowerby, 1837 studied herein. FIGURE 11. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein.	2019-11-19	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno		Zenodo	biologists	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno			
765787B1FFFEFF82FF09FD67FB375E93.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3548358/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3548358	FIGURES 12–19. FIGURE 12. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Polinices Monfort, 1810 studied herein. FIGURE 13. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 14. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 15. Relationship between the aperture width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 16. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Euspira Agassiz in J. Sowerby, 1837 studied herein. FIGURE 17. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 18. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 19. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Tectonatica Sacco, 1890 studied herein.	FIGURES 12–19. FIGURE 12. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Polinices Monfort, 1810 studied herein. FIGURE 13. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 14. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 15. Relationship between the aperture width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 16. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Euspira Agassiz in J. Sowerby, 1837 studied herein. FIGURE 17. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 18. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 19. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Tectonatica Sacco, 1890 studied herein.	2019-11-19	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno		Zenodo	biologists	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno			
765787B1FFFCFF85FF09FBE3FB375C77.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3548354/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3548354	FIGURES 4–11. FIGURE 4. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch diameter in the naticine taxa studied. FIGURE 5. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch diameter in the poliniceine and sinine taxa studied. FIGURE 6. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch whorls in the naticine taxa studied. FIGURE 7. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch whorls in the poliniceine and sinine taxa studied. FIG- URE 8. Relationship between the protoconch diameter/diameter of the first half-whorl ratio and the protoconch whorls in the naticine taxa studied. FIGURE 9. Relationship between the protoconch diameter/diameter of the first half-whorl ratio and the protoconch whorls in the poliniceine and sinine taxa studied. FIGURE 10. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Euspira Agassiz in J. Sowerby, 1837 studied herein. FIGURE 11. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein.	FIGURES 4–11. FIGURE 4. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch diameter in the naticine taxa studied. FIGURE 5. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch diameter in the poliniceine and sinine taxa studied. FIGURE 6. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch whorls in the naticine taxa studied. FIGURE 7. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch whorls in the poliniceine and sinine taxa studied. FIG- URE 8. Relationship between the protoconch diameter/diameter of the first half-whorl ratio and the protoconch whorls in the naticine taxa studied. FIGURE 9. Relationship between the protoconch diameter/diameter of the first half-whorl ratio and the protoconch whorls in the poliniceine and sinine taxa studied. FIGURE 10. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Euspira Agassiz in J. Sowerby, 1837 studied herein. FIGURE 11. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein.	2019-11-19	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno		Zenodo	biologists	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno			
765787B1FFFCFF85FF09FBE3FB375C77.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3548358/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3548358	FIGURES 12–19. FIGURE 12. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Polinices Monfort, 1810 studied herein. FIGURE 13. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 14. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 15. Relationship between the aperture width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 16. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Euspira Agassiz in J. Sowerby, 1837 studied herein. FIGURE 17. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 18. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 19. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Tectonatica Sacco, 1890 studied herein.	FIGURES 12–19. FIGURE 12. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Polinices Monfort, 1810 studied herein. FIGURE 13. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 14. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 15. Relationship between the aperture width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 16. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Euspira Agassiz in J. Sowerby, 1837 studied herein. FIGURE 17. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 18. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 19. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Tectonatica Sacco, 1890 studied herein.	2019-11-19	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno		Zenodo	biologists	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno			
765787B1FFFCFF85FF09FBE3FB375C77.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3548360/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3548360	FIGURES 20–22. FIGURE 20. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 21. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the umbilicus width for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 22. Relationship between the width of the abapical sulcus and the width of the adapical sulcus for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein.	FIGURES 20–22. FIGURE 20. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 21. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the umbilicus width for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 22. Relationship between the width of the abapical sulcus and the width of the adapical sulcus for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein.	2019-11-19	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno		Zenodo	biologists	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno			
765787B1FFFBFFB8FF09FE23FB375C0F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3548358/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3548358	FIGURES 12–19. FIGURE 12. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Polinices Monfort, 1810 studied herein. FIGURE 13. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 14. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 15. Relationship between the aperture width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 16. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Euspira Agassiz in J. Sowerby, 1837 studied herein. FIGURE 17. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 18. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 19. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Tectonatica Sacco, 1890 studied herein.	FIGURES 12–19. FIGURE 12. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Polinices Monfort, 1810 studied herein. FIGURE 13. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 14. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 15. Relationship between the aperture width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 16. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Euspira Agassiz in J. Sowerby, 1837 studied herein. FIGURE 17. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 18. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 19. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Tectonatica Sacco, 1890 studied herein.	2019-11-19	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno		Zenodo	biologists	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno			
765787B1FFFBFFB8FF09FE23FB375C0F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3548354/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3548354	FIGURES 4–11. FIGURE 4. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch diameter in the naticine taxa studied. FIGURE 5. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch diameter in the poliniceine and sinine taxa studied. FIGURE 6. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch whorls in the naticine taxa studied. FIGURE 7. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch whorls in the poliniceine and sinine taxa studied. FIG- URE 8. Relationship between the protoconch diameter/diameter of the first half-whorl ratio and the protoconch whorls in the naticine taxa studied. FIGURE 9. Relationship between the protoconch diameter/diameter of the first half-whorl ratio and the protoconch whorls in the poliniceine and sinine taxa studied. FIGURE 10. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Euspira Agassiz in J. Sowerby, 1837 studied herein. FIGURE 11. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein.	FIGURES 4–11. FIGURE 4. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch diameter in the naticine taxa studied. FIGURE 5. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch diameter in the poliniceine and sinine taxa studied. FIGURE 6. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch whorls in the naticine taxa studied. FIGURE 7. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch whorls in the poliniceine and sinine taxa studied. FIG- URE 8. Relationship between the protoconch diameter/diameter of the first half-whorl ratio and the protoconch whorls in the naticine taxa studied. FIGURE 9. Relationship between the protoconch diameter/diameter of the first half-whorl ratio and the protoconch whorls in the poliniceine and sinine taxa studied. FIGURE 10. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Euspira Agassiz in J. Sowerby, 1837 studied herein. FIGURE 11. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein.	2019-11-19	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno		Zenodo	biologists	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno			
765787B1FFC6FFBAFF09FEEBFB395FE3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3548378/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3548378	FIGURE 31. Payraudeautia varovtsiana sp. nov. from the middle Miocene (Upper Badenian) of Ukraine at Varovtsi. 1. Holotype, MPUM 11754, teleoconch and protoconch; 2. Paratype 1, MPUM 11755; 3. Paratype 2, MZB 50508, teleoconch and protoconch.Arrows point to the protoconch-teleoconch transition. Scale bars: 2 mm, except protoconchs: 500 µm (fig. 3c); 100 µm (fig. 3d).	FIGURE 31. Payraudeautia varovtsiana sp. nov. from the middle Miocene (Upper Badenian) of Ukraine at Varovtsi. 1. Holotype, MPUM 11754, teleoconch and protoconch; 2. Paratype 1, MPUM 11755; 3. Paratype 2, MZB 50508, teleoconch and protoconch.Arrows point to the protoconch-teleoconch transition. Scale bars: 2 mm, except protoconchs: 500 µm (fig. 3c); 100 µm (fig. 3d).	2019-11-19	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno		Zenodo	biologists	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno			
765787B1FFC6FFBAFF09FEEBFB395FE3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3548358/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3548358	FIGURES 12–19. FIGURE 12. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Polinices Monfort, 1810 studied herein. FIGURE 13. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 14. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 15. Relationship between the aperture width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 16. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Euspira Agassiz in J. Sowerby, 1837 studied herein. FIGURE 17. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 18. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 19. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Tectonatica Sacco, 1890 studied herein.	FIGURES 12–19. FIGURE 12. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Polinices Monfort, 1810 studied herein. FIGURE 13. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 14. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 15. Relationship between the aperture width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 16. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Euspira Agassiz in J. Sowerby, 1837 studied herein. FIGURE 17. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 18. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 19. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Tectonatica Sacco, 1890 studied herein.	2019-11-19	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno		Zenodo	biologists	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno			
765787B1FFC6FFBAFF09FEEBFB395FE3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3548360/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3548360	FIGURES 20–22. FIGURE 20. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 21. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the umbilicus width for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 22. Relationship between the width of the abapical sulcus and the width of the adapical sulcus for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein.	FIGURES 20–22. FIGURE 20. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 21. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the umbilicus width for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 22. Relationship between the width of the abapical sulcus and the width of the adapical sulcus for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein.	2019-11-19	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno		Zenodo	biologists	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno			
765787B1FFC6FFBAFF09FEEBFB395FE3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3548354/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3548354	FIGURES 4–11. FIGURE 4. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch diameter in the naticine taxa studied. FIGURE 5. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch diameter in the poliniceine and sinine taxa studied. FIGURE 6. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch whorls in the naticine taxa studied. FIGURE 7. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch whorls in the poliniceine and sinine taxa studied. FIG- URE 8. Relationship between the protoconch diameter/diameter of the first half-whorl ratio and the protoconch whorls in the naticine taxa studied. FIGURE 9. Relationship between the protoconch diameter/diameter of the first half-whorl ratio and the protoconch whorls in the poliniceine and sinine taxa studied. FIGURE 10. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Euspira Agassiz in J. Sowerby, 1837 studied herein. FIGURE 11. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein.	FIGURES 4–11. FIGURE 4. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch diameter in the naticine taxa studied. FIGURE 5. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch diameter in the poliniceine and sinine taxa studied. FIGURE 6. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch whorls in the naticine taxa studied. FIGURE 7. Relationship between the diameter of the first half-whorl of the protoconch and the protoconch whorls in the poliniceine and sinine taxa studied. FIG- URE 8. Relationship between the protoconch diameter/diameter of the first half-whorl ratio and the protoconch whorls in the naticine taxa studied. FIGURE 9. Relationship between the protoconch diameter/diameter of the first half-whorl ratio and the protoconch whorls in the poliniceine and sinine taxa studied. FIGURE 10. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Euspira Agassiz in J. Sowerby, 1837 studied herein. FIGURE 11. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein.	2019-11-19	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno		Zenodo	biologists	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno			
765787B1FFC4FFBCFF09FB88FCE45FE3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3548358/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3548358	FIGURES 12–19. FIGURE 12. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Polinices Monfort, 1810 studied herein. FIGURE 13. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 14. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 15. Relationship between the aperture width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 16. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Euspira Agassiz in J. Sowerby, 1837 studied herein. FIGURE 17. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 18. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 19. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Tectonatica Sacco, 1890 studied herein.	FIGURES 12–19. FIGURE 12. Relationship between the spire height and the shell height for species of Polinices Monfort, 1810 studied herein. FIGURE 13. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 14. Relationship between the aperture width and the aperture height for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 15. Relationship between the aperture width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 16. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Euspira Agassiz in J. Sowerby, 1837 studied herein. FIGURE 17. Relationship between the umbilicus width and the maximum diameter for species of Payraudeautia Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dolfuss, 1883 studied herein. FIGURE 18. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Cochlis Röding, 1798 studied herein. FIGURE 19. Relationship between the width of the umbilical callus and the maximum diameter for species of Tectonatica Sacco, 1890 studied herein.	2019-11-19	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno		Zenodo	biologists	Pedriali, Luca;Sosso, Maurizio;Dell’Angelo, Bruno			
