taxonID	type	description	language	source
C446D264499B50308621A202DAF0AC53.taxon	description	Figs 2 A, 3, 4, 5, 15	en	Zhang, Jianshuang, Zhang, Haoshen, Liu, Jinxin, Yu, Hao, Xu, Xiang (2025): A survey of mimetid spiders (Araneae, Mimetidae) from Central Guizhou Province, China. Zoosystematics and Evolution 101 (2): 711-734, DOI: 10.3897/zse.101.146895
C446D264499B50308621A202DAF0AC53.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Males of M. caudatus resemble those of M. bucerus and M. lingbaoshanensis in having a cylindrical conductor (C) extending outward, and a developed, distinctly prominent cymbial apex (CA) (cymbial apex unobtrusive in all other congeners which with cylindrical conductor distinctly extending, such as M. echinatus, M. juhuaensis, M. lamellaris and M. yinae; as in Zeng et al. 2016: figs 1 B, C, 2 A, B, 5 B, C, 6 A, B, Liu et al. 2021 b: figs 3 A – E, 5 A – E and Gan et al. 2019: figs 5 A, B, 6 C, D), but can be easily differentiated from M. bucerus and M. lingbaoshanensis by: (1) in both pro- and retrolateral views, cymbial apex (CA) triangular (Fig. 3 C, D) (vs. subuliform in M. bucerus, handle-like in M. lingbaoshanensis; Gan et al. 2019: figs 1 B, C, 2 A, B, 3 C, D, 4 A, B); (2) in retrolateral view, paracymbium (Pc) consisting of a conical basal outgrowth and a blade-shaped distal outgrowth (Fig. 3 A, B, D) (vs. with a beak-like basal outgrowth and a claviform distal outgrowth in M. bucerus, with a claw-shaped basal outgrowth and a subtriangular distal outgrowth in M. lingbaoshanensis; Gan et al. 2019: figs 1 C, 2 B, 3 D, 4 B); and (3) palpal tibia slightly longer than wide, the ratio of length / width being approximately 1.3 (Fig. 3 A – D) (vs. distinctly longer than wide, the ratio of length / width is at least 2.8 in M. bucerus and 2.0 in M. lingbaoshanensis; Gan et al. 2019: figs 1 B, C, 2 A, B, 3 C, D, 4 A, B). The female of M. caudatus can be distinguished from all other congeners with the exception of M. lingbaoshanensis by having a proximally biforked scape (Sc) (scape absent, or present but proximally not forked in other Mimetus species, such as M. yinae and M. guiyang sp. nov.; Gan et al. 2019: figs 5 C, D, 6 F, G and Fig. 6 A, C) and similar vulva, but can be recognised by the Y-shaped scape (Sc) in M. caudatus (Fig. 4 A, C) (vs. V-shaped in M. lingbaoshanensis; Gan et al. 2019: figs 3 F, 4 C) and by the dumbbell-shaped basal plate (Bp) with the posterior margin concave medially in M. caudatus (Fig. 4 B, D) (vs. basal plate labiate, posterior margin slightly prominent medially in M. lingbaoshanensis; Gan et al. 2019: figs 3 F, G, 4 C, D).	en	Zhang, Jianshuang, Zhang, Haoshen, Liu, Jinxin, Yu, Hao, Xu, Xiang (2025): A survey of mimetid spiders (Araneae, Mimetidae) from Central Guizhou Province, China. Zoosystematics and Evolution 101 (2): 711-734, DOI: 10.3897/zse.101.146895
C446D264499B50308621A202DAF0AC53.taxon	description	Description. Male (MGNU - 2014 - MIMC 001). Measurements. Total length 5.75. Carapace 2.97 long, 2.21 wide. Abdomen 2.78 long, 2.12 wide. Sternum 1.44 long and 0.95 wide. Labium wider than long. Clypeus height 0.26. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.16, ALE 0.14, PME 0.15, PLE 0.15, AME – AME 0.18, ALE – AME 0.21, PME – PME 0.09, PME – PLE 0.30. MOA 0.50 long, anterior width 0.51, posterior width 0.40. Leg measurements: I 17.23 (4.59, 5.54, 5.06, 2.04), II 13.21 (3.73, 4.38, 3.42, 1.68), III 9.01 (2.78, 2.96, 1.95, 1.32), IV 10.37 (3.32, 3.46, 2.39, 1.20). Habitus (Figs 4 E, 5 A – C). Carapace nearly pyriform, light yellowish, with a distinctive anchor-shaped pattern starting from behind PER and almost reaching fovea, a pair of small patches on the lateral margins of the carapace near the coxa II, and a pair of large patches on the lateral margins of the carapace near the coxae III and IV; fovea represented by a small pit; ocular region distinctly narrowed, cervical groove and radial grooves indistinguishable; tegument smooth, clothed with short, sparse setae along radial grooves. Sternum light brown, shaped like a shield. Labium nearly oblong, reddish brown. Endites anteriorly white, posteriorly reddish brown, with dense scopulae on inner margin. Chelicerae dark brown, promargin with 11 peg teeth, retromargin with only one normal tooth. Leg color similar to that of carapace, with irregular brown annuli in the middle parts of femur. Abdomen oval, yellowish white, dorsally covered by many small whitish and large black patches, with many weakly ossified hair bases still remaining, but almost all hairs broken off from body and lost; venter basically light brown, centrally with a V-shaped grayish stripe, posteriorly with two irregular-shaped grayish speckles. Palp (Fig. 3 A – D). Tibia short, <1 / 3 of cymbium length, about 1.3 longer than wide. Cymbium (Cy) with basal extension (CBE) and an elongated apex (CA): cymbial base extension (CBE) represented by a semi-circular flange; cymbial apex (CA) shaped like index finger in ventral and dorsal views and triangular in lateral view, ca. 1 / 3 of cymbium length, pointing dorsal-retrolaterally. Paracymbium (Pc) broad, consisting of a conical basal outgrowth and a blade-shaped distal outgrowth, ca. 1 / 3 of cymbium length. Tegulum (T) nearly circular, centrally and apically membranous; sperm duct sinuate, forming a loop along tegular margin. Tegular apophysis (TA) sheet-shaped in ventral view and digitiform in prolateral view, located at proximal-prolateral position of tegulum (ca. 8 – 9 o’clock position of tegulum). Subtegulum (St) located posteriorly to tegulum, without apophysis. Embolus (E) filiform, arising at approximately the 7 – 8 o’clock position, terminating at ca. 12 o’clock position, with the tip (ET) hidden by conductor. Conductor (C) large, cylindrical, nearly as long as tegulum diameter, proximally partly membranous, apically disc-shaped and strongly sclerotized, dorsally with two hook-shaped apophyses and a sheet-shaped fold. Female (MGNU - 2014 - MIMC 002). Measurements. Total length 7.61. Carapace 3.27 long, 2.24 wide. Abdomen 4.34 long, 3.97 wide. Sternum 1.46 long and 1.14 wide. Labium wider than long. Clypeus height 0.35. Chelicerae with 11 teeth on promargin and two on retromargin. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.19, ALE 0.16, PME 0.16, PLE 0.18, AME – AME 0.21, ALE – AME 0.26, PME – PME 0.14, PME – PLE 0.39. MOA 0.55 long, anterior width 0.55, posterior width 0.41. Leg measurements: I 18.10 (4.98, 6.32, 4.83, 1.97), II 14.28 (4.14, 4.92, 3.57, 1.65), III 9.84 (3.05, 3.30, 2.12, 1.37), IV 11.46 (3.68, 3.92, 2.58, 1.68). Habitus (Figs 4 F, 5 D – F). Slightly larger and lighter than male, other characters as in male. Epigyne (Fig. 4 A – C). Plate slightly longer than wide, spermathecae (Sp) distinctly visible through transparent integument. Basal plate (BP) broad, ca. 4.5 × wider than its high, with the middle part covered by the scape and with the lateral margins curved and the posterior margin concave medially, shaped like a transverse dumbbell. Scape (Sc) Y-shaped, relatively long, ca. 2 / 3 of epigyne length, originating near the middle area of epigynal plate, its apex distinctly overpasses the posterior margin of basal plate. Copulatory openings (CO) cambered, located posterior-bilaterally to scape. Copulatory ducts (CD) short barely distinct seen. Spermathecae (Sp) situated anteriorly, balloon-shaped, relatively large, ca. 1.15 × longer than wide, surface smooth; two spermathecae touching each other. Fertilization duct (FD) membranous, located on dorsal-basal surface of spermathecae.	en	Zhang, Jianshuang, Zhang, Haoshen, Liu, Jinxin, Yu, Hao, Xu, Xiang (2025): A survey of mimetid spiders (Araneae, Mimetidae) from Central Guizhou Province, China. Zoosystematics and Evolution 101 (2): 711-734, DOI: 10.3897/zse.101.146895
C446D264499B50308621A202DAF0AC53.taxon	distribution	Distribution. China (Guizhou, Guangxi) (Table 1; Figs 2 A, 15).	en	Zhang, Jianshuang, Zhang, Haoshen, Liu, Jinxin, Yu, Hao, Xu, Xiang (2025): A survey of mimetid spiders (Araneae, Mimetidae) from Central Guizhou Province, China. Zoosystematics and Evolution 101 (2): 711-734, DOI: 10.3897/zse.101.146895
88AB19090C195CBD93E09939E57269C8.taxon	description	Figs 2 A, 6, 14 B, 15	en	Zhang, Jianshuang, Zhang, Haoshen, Liu, Jinxin, Yu, Hao, Xu, Xiang (2025): A survey of mimetid spiders (Araneae, Mimetidae) from Central Guizhou Province, China. Zoosystematics and Evolution 101 (2): 711-734, DOI: 10.3897/zse.101.146895
88AB19090C195CBD93E09939E57269C8.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The specific epithet is derived from the name of the type locality; noun in apposition.	en	Zhang, Jianshuang, Zhang, Haoshen, Liu, Jinxin, Yu, Hao, Xu, Xiang (2025): A survey of mimetid spiders (Araneae, Mimetidae) from Central Guizhou Province, China. Zoosystematics and Evolution 101 (2): 711-734, DOI: 10.3897/zse.101.146895
88AB19090C195CBD93E09939E57269C8.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. The female of M. guiyang sp. nov. can be distinguished from those of all congeners with the exception of M. lingbaoshanensis by having a short and narrow scape (Sc) (scape tip not reaching the posterior margin of the basal plate (Bp), and scape narrower than 1 / 5 of basal plate width in both species, as in Fig. 6 A, C and Gan et al. 2019: 5, figs 3 F, 4 C, vs. scape tip overpassing the posterior margin of basal plate, such as M. echinatus and M. yinae, or scape tip no less than 1 / 5 of basal plate width, such as M. juhuaensis and M. labiatus, as in Wang 1990: fig. IV. 1, Zeng et al. 2016: figs 3 B, 4 B, Gan et al. 2019: figs 5 C, 6 F, and Liu et al. 2021 b: figs 4, 6 A). The new species can be differentiated by the scape nearly finger-like, proximally not forked (Figs 6 A, C) (vs. subtriangular or V-shaped, proximally forked in M. lingbaoshanensis; Gan et al. 2019: 5, figs 3 F, 4 C); and the posterior margin of basal plate’s smoothness (Fig. 6 A – D) (vs. medially slightly prominent in M. lingbaoshanensis; Gan et al. 2019: 5, figs 3 F, G, 4 C, D).	en	Zhang, Jianshuang, Zhang, Haoshen, Liu, Jinxin, Yu, Hao, Xu, Xiang (2025): A survey of mimetid spiders (Araneae, Mimetidae) from Central Guizhou Province, China. Zoosystematics and Evolution 101 (2): 711-734, DOI: 10.3897/zse.101.146895
88AB19090C195CBD93E09939E57269C8.taxon	description	Description. Female (holotype, MGNU - 2017 - MIMG 001). Measurements. Total length 4.65. Carapace 2.29 long, 1.58 wide. Abdomen 2.36 long, 1.87 wide. Sternum 1.02 long and 0.73 wide. Labium wider than long. Clypeus height 0.26. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.13, ALE 0.12, PME 0.13, PLE 0.12, AME – AME 0.11, ALE – AME 0.16, PME – PME 0.08, PME – PLE 0.23. MOA 0.36 long, anterior width 0.37, posterior width 0.33. Leg measurements: I 11.97 (3.57, 4.17, 2.96, 1.27), II 9.06 (2.79, 3.12, 2.15, 1.00), III 5.49 (1.79, 1.80, 1.14, 0.76), IV 6.86 (2.22, 2.38, 1.51, 0.75). Habitus (Figs 6 E – G, 14 B). Carapace nearly pyriform, uniformly yellowish white except cephalic region with a distinctive fan-shaped pattern starting from behind PER and almost reaching fovea; fovea nearly invisible; pars cephalica slightly narrowed, cervical groove and radial grooves indistinct; tegument smooth, clothed with short, sparse setae along the margins of cephalic pattern. Sternum yellowish, shaped like a shield. Labium band-shaped, light reddish brown. Endites anteriorly white, posteriorly colored as that of labium. Chelicerae dark, promargin with 11 peg teeth, retromargin with only one normal tooth. Leg yellowish white, with countless grey spots in the distal parts of femur and conspicuous dark brown annuli in the proximal parts of femur and tibia. Abdomen oval, yellowish white, dorsally covered by several relatively large black patches and small whitish spots; dorsum also with many binate hair bases, all hair bases ossified, among them ca. six or seven pairs relatively large and bubble-shaped, located medially; venter basically light brown, with numerous irregular, silver spots of varying sizes, centrally with a black longitudinal stripe, laterally with a black oblique stripe on each side, posteriorly with a pair of arc-shaped stripes forming a bracket-like pattern. Epigyne (Fig. 6 A – D). Plate nearly as wide as long, through which large spermathecae (Sp) are clearly visible. Hood (H) hemispherical, distinctly large, as wide as epigyne. Basal plate (Bp) large, ca. 1.9 × wider than its high, nearly trapezoidal, with slightly curved posterior and lateral margins, its anterior part hidden by the hood, and its middle part partly covered by the scape. Scape (Sc) finger-like, approximately 2 / 5 of epigyne length, originating near anterior margin of hood, with its apex distinctly beyond the posterior margin of hood but not reaching the posterior margin of the basal plate. Copulatory openings (CO) indistinct, hidden by the hood. Copulatory ducts (CD) short and barely visible. Spermathecae (Sp) situated anteriorly, egg-shaped, relatively large, ca. 1.2 × longer than wide, surface slightly wrinkled; two spermathecae closely spaced. Fertilization ducts (FD), membranous and curved, located on dorsal-basal surface of spermathecae. Male. Unknown.	en	Zhang, Jianshuang, Zhang, Haoshen, Liu, Jinxin, Yu, Hao, Xu, Xiang (2025): A survey of mimetid spiders (Araneae, Mimetidae) from Central Guizhou Province, China. Zoosystematics and Evolution 101 (2): 711-734, DOI: 10.3897/zse.101.146895
88AB19090C195CBD93E09939E57269C8.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Known only from the type locality (Table 1; Figs 2 A, 15).	en	Zhang, Jianshuang, Zhang, Haoshen, Liu, Jinxin, Yu, Hao, Xu, Xiang (2025): A survey of mimetid spiders (Araneae, Mimetidae) from Central Guizhou Province, China. Zoosystematics and Evolution 101 (2): 711-734, DOI: 10.3897/zse.101.146895
0A8F450EEEC9574CB1CBFB6B983CF4CB.taxon	type_taxon	Type species. Mimetus syllepsicus Hentz, 1832, from the USA and Mexico.	en	Zhang, Jianshuang, Zhang, Haoshen, Liu, Jinxin, Yu, Hao, Xu, Xiang (2025): A survey of mimetid spiders (Araneae, Mimetidae) from Central Guizhou Province, China. Zoosystematics and Evolution 101 (2): 711-734, DOI: 10.3897/zse.101.146895
F4EEF56651095890AB72A6B76A4BEA86.taxon	description	Figs 2 A, 7, 8, 14 A, 15	en	Zhang, Jianshuang, Zhang, Haoshen, Liu, Jinxin, Yu, Hao, Xu, Xiang (2025): A survey of mimetid spiders (Araneae, Mimetidae) from Central Guizhou Province, China. Zoosystematics and Evolution 101 (2): 711-734, DOI: 10.3897/zse.101.146895
F4EEF56651095890AB72A6B76A4BEA86.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The specific name is a matronym in honor of Lanmei Tang, the mother of the collector.	en	Zhang, Jianshuang, Zhang, Haoshen, Liu, Jinxin, Yu, Hao, Xu, Xiang (2025): A survey of mimetid spiders (Araneae, Mimetidae) from Central Guizhou Province, China. Zoosystematics and Evolution 101 (2): 711-734, DOI: 10.3897/zse.101.146895
F4EEF56651095890AB72A6B76A4BEA86.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Male of M. lanmeiae sp. nov. resembles that of M. contrarius (Zeng et al. 2019: 675, figs 1 A – G, 2 A – E) in having a C-shaped embolus (E), disc-shaped conductor (C), and elongated, shovel-shaped cymbial apex (CA), but differ by: (1) cymbium (Cy) with an ecto-medial process (CEMP) in the new species (vs. CEMP absent in the latter) (cf. Fig. 7 A, B, D and Zeng et al. 2019: figs 1 C, E, 2 B, C); (2) paracymbium (Pc) shaped like water drop, anteriorly with a highly sclerotized thumb-shaped apophysis in the new species (vs. nearly triangular, medially with a small tooth-shaped apophysis in the latter) (cf. Fig. 7 A, B, D and Zeng et al. 2019: figs 1 E, 2 C); and (3) palpal tibia approximately 1.4 × longer than wide in the new species (vs. palpal tibia distinctly longer than wide, the ratio of length / width is approximately 2.8 in the latter) (cf. Fig. 7 A – D and Zeng et al. 2019: figs 1 C – E, 2 A – C).	en	Zhang, Jianshuang, Zhang, Haoshen, Liu, Jinxin, Yu, Hao, Xu, Xiang (2025): A survey of mimetid spiders (Araneae, Mimetidae) from Central Guizhou Province, China. Zoosystematics and Evolution 101 (2): 711-734, DOI: 10.3897/zse.101.146895
F4EEF56651095890AB72A6B76A4BEA86.taxon	description	Description. Male (holotype, MGNU - 2022 - MIML 001). Measurements. Total length 2.14. Carapace 0.96 long, 0.86 wide. Abdomen 1.18 long, 1.05 wide. Sternum 0.48 long and 0.49 wide. Labium wider than long. Clypeus height 0.18. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.09, ALE 0.08, PME 0.09, PLE 0.08, AME – AME 0.08, ALE – AME 0.03, PME – PME 0.04, PME – PLE 0.11. MOA 0.24 long, anterior width 0.24, posterior width 0.22. Leg measurements: I 6.2 (1.65, 2.15, 1.61, 0.79), II 4.92 (1.45, 1.65, 1.13, 0.69), III 2.91 (0.85, 0.91, 0.66, 0.50), IV 3.60 (1.12, 2.38, 0.75, 0.53). Habitus (Figs 8, 14 A). Carapace oval, slightly longer than wide, basically yellowish white, with a large black Y-shaped pattern (both lateral margins of pattern are wave-like lines) between ocular area and fovea; fovea inconspicuous; ocular area slightly narrowed, cervical groove and radial grooves invisible; tegument smooth, without setae. Sternum white, heart- or shield-shaped. Labium band-shaped, slightly curved, light reddish brown. Endites anteriorly white, posteriorly colored as that of labium. Chelicerae light reddish brown, promargin with eight peg teeth, retromargin with two small teeth. Leg yellowish white, with several black spots in the distal half of femur. Abdomen round, yellowish white, dorsally with whitish and dark patches, and many weakly ossified hair bases, but almost all hairs have broken off from the body; venter basically yellowish-white, anteriorly with a pair of long, arc-shaped stripes on both sides, extending ca. 1 / 2 of abdomen length, forming a large, bracket-shaped pattern, posteriorly with a nearly circular black spot. Palp (Fig. 7 A – D). Tibia ca. 1 / 3 of cymbium length, about 1.4 longer than wide. Cymbium (Cy) with a developed apex (CA), an ecto-medial process (CEMP), and a basal extension (CBE): cymbial apex elongated, ca. 1 / 3 of cymbium length, nearly triangular in ventral and dorsal views and shovel-shaped in both lateral views, its tip pointing ventro-retrolaterally; ecto-medial process triangular or tooth-shaped, slightly curved, apex sharp and pointing ventro-retrolaterally; cymbial basal extension thumb-like, partly membranous, its tip blunt. Paracymbium (Pc) broad, ca. 2 / 5 of cymbium length, with a highly sclerotized thumb-shaped apophysis. Tegulum (T) nearly circular, centrally and apically membranous, slightly excavated on prolatero-apical side to accommodate embolus; sperm duct distinct, forming a loop along tegular margin. Tegular apophysis (TA) triangular in ventral view and papilliform in prolateral view, located at proximal-prolateral position of tegulum (ca. 8 – 9 o’clock position of tegulum). Subtegulum (St) located postero-retrolaterally to tegulum, without apophysis. Embolus (E) C-shaped, arising at 6 – 7 o’clock position, terminating at ca. 12 o’clock position. Conductor (C) large, disc-shaped, slightly extending outward, membranous centrally and strongly sclerotized marginally, its anterior margin folded to cover the tip of emblous (ET). Female. Unknown.	en	Zhang, Jianshuang, Zhang, Haoshen, Liu, Jinxin, Yu, Hao, Xu, Xiang (2025): A survey of mimetid spiders (Araneae, Mimetidae) from Central Guizhou Province, China. Zoosystematics and Evolution 101 (2): 711-734, DOI: 10.3897/zse.101.146895
F4EEF56651095890AB72A6B76A4BEA86.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Known only from the type locality (Table 1; Figs 2 A, 15).	en	Zhang, Jianshuang, Zhang, Haoshen, Liu, Jinxin, Yu, Hao, Xu, Xiang (2025): A survey of mimetid spiders (Araneae, Mimetidae) from Central Guizhou Province, China. Zoosystematics and Evolution 101 (2): 711-734, DOI: 10.3897/zse.101.146895
F1A02FBEA9715B56B51593D44389DDB6.taxon	description	Figs 2 A, 9, 10, 11, 14 C, D, 15	en	Zhang, Jianshuang, Zhang, Haoshen, Liu, Jinxin, Yu, Hao, Xu, Xiang (2025): A survey of mimetid spiders (Araneae, Mimetidae) from Central Guizhou Province, China. Zoosystematics and Evolution 101 (2): 711-734, DOI: 10.3897/zse.101.146895
F1A02FBEA9715B56B51593D44389DDB6.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis and description. See Song and Zhu (1993). Male palp as in Fig. 9 A – C, epigyne as in Fig. 9 D, E, habitus as in Figs 10, 14 C, D, living specimens as in Fig. 11.	en	Zhang, Jianshuang, Zhang, Haoshen, Liu, Jinxin, Yu, Hao, Xu, Xiang (2025): A survey of mimetid spiders (Araneae, Mimetidae) from Central Guizhou Province, China. Zoosystematics and Evolution 101 (2): 711-734, DOI: 10.3897/zse.101.146895
F1A02FBEA9715B56B51593D44389DDB6.taxon	distribution	Distribution. China (Guizhou, Hubei) (Table 1; Figs 2 A, 15).	en	Zhang, Jianshuang, Zhang, Haoshen, Liu, Jinxin, Yu, Hao, Xu, Xiang (2025): A survey of mimetid spiders (Araneae, Mimetidae) from Central Guizhou Province, China. Zoosystematics and Evolution 101 (2): 711-734, DOI: 10.3897/zse.101.146895
44FE9D614AE455868EF6DCCFEEF839FC.taxon	description	Figs 2 A, 12, 13, 14 E, F, 15	en	Zhang, Jianshuang, Zhang, Haoshen, Liu, Jinxin, Yu, Hao, Xu, Xiang (2025): A survey of mimetid spiders (Araneae, Mimetidae) from Central Guizhou Province, China. Zoosystematics and Evolution 101 (2): 711-734, DOI: 10.3897/zse.101.146895
44FE9D614AE455868EF6DCCFEEF839FC.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis and description. See Paik (1967). Male palp as in Fig. 12 A – C, epigyne as in Fig. 12 D, E, habitus as in Figs 13, 14 E, F, living specimens as in Fig. 12 F, G.	en	Zhang, Jianshuang, Zhang, Haoshen, Liu, Jinxin, Yu, Hao, Xu, Xiang (2025): A survey of mimetid spiders (Araneae, Mimetidae) from Central Guizhou Province, China. Zoosystematics and Evolution 101 (2): 711-734, DOI: 10.3897/zse.101.146895
44FE9D614AE455868EF6DCCFEEF839FC.taxon	distribution	Distribution. China (Hunan, Guangxi, Guizhou, Zhejiang) (Table 1; Figs 2 A, 15).	en	Zhang, Jianshuang, Zhang, Haoshen, Liu, Jinxin, Yu, Hao, Xu, Xiang (2025): A survey of mimetid spiders (Araneae, Mimetidae) from Central Guizhou Province, China. Zoosystematics and Evolution 101 (2): 711-734, DOI: 10.3897/zse.101.146895
