identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
63168793FFFBFFDFFF6ADB76FAE1B054.text	63168793FFFBFFDFFF6ADB76FAE1B054.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Neorhaphidophora Gorochov 1999	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Genus  Neorhaphidophora Gorochov, 1999</p>
            <p>Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 77(1), 74.</p>
            <p> Type species:  Neorhaphidophora valentinae Gorochov, 1999 , by original designation Diagnosis This genus is easily distinguished from the other genera of  Rhaphidophorinae by the following characteristics: male abdominal tergites without distinct processes or projections; male epiproct is strongly modified, i.e. with a pair of proximal or subproximal processes (lobes) directed backwards or upwards, and with the distal part strongly curved downwards and forwards (thus, its apex is almost inserted into the anal or genital cavity); male genitalia with ventrolateral lobes appear very long (distinctly longer than other genital lobes) in imago and old nymphs. </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/63168793FFFBFFDFFF6ADB76FAE1B054	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich;Gorochov, Andrei V.;Tanomtong, Alongklod;Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Gorochov, Andrei V., Tanomtong, Alongklod, Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2020): Contribution to the knowledge of Rhaphidophorinae (Orthoptera: Ensifera: Rhaphidophoridae) from Thailand: three genera Neorhaphidophora, Eurhaphidophora and Minirhaphidophora. Zootaxa 4853 (2): 235-253, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4853.2.5
63168793FFF8FFDFFF6ADD9BFA4EB5A6.text	63168793FFF8FFDFFF6ADD9BFA4EB5A6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Neorhaphidophora Gorochov 1999	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Key to all known species of  Neorhaphidophora (excluded N. brevispinula and N. longispinula which need a further study) </p>
            <p>1. Male epiproct with a pair of short proximal lobes directed upwards, or with a pair of rather long subproximal processes directed backwards; its apical (directed forwards) part is long and deeply inserted into the anal cavity (above the paraprocts or between them)............................................................................................... 2</p>
            <p> - Male epiproct with a pair of short subproximal lobes directed backwards; its apical (directed forwards) part is short and almost inserted into the genital cavity (under paraprocts)........................................  N. steineri Gorochov, 2010</p>
            <p>2. Paired processes (lobes) of male epiproct distinctly protrudes beyond paraprocts; male genital plate almost without spiniform tubercles beside the styli................................................................................ 3</p>
            <p>- Paired lobes (processes) of male epiproct not reaching apices of paraprocts; male genital plate with distinct spiniform tubercles beside styli.......................................................................................... 4</p>
            <p> 3. Apical (directed forwards) part of male epiproct with lateral surfaces around the ventromedian groove but not pressed to each other; male genital plate with moderately short styli (styli in profile are almost twice as long as they are wide); female genital plate with obtusely angular apex and small membranous area in the middle of this plate...................................................................................................  N. valentinae proxima Gorochov, 2012</p>
            <p> - Apical (directed forwards) part of male epiproct with lateral surfaces around the ventromedian groove pressed to each other; male genital plate with very short styli (styli are in profile and almost 1.5 times as long as they are wide); female genital plate with widely rounded apex and membranous area running from the middle to the apex of this plate.........................................................................................  N. valentinae valentinae Gorochov, 1999</p>
            <p> 4. Paired lobes (processes) of male epiproct are narrower in profile (in the shape of distinct tubercles); male genital plate with styles almost the same as in  N. v. proxima in profile (see above), and with an almost transverse (somewhat sinuated) posterior edge between them; median sclerotized plate of female genital plate is less than 1.5 times as wide as it is long.............................................................................................  N. grata Gorochov, 2012</p>
            <p> - Paired lobes (processes) of male epiproct rather wide in profile (in the shape of inflated convexities); male genital plate with styles clearly wider in profile and with a distinct angular posteromedian notch; female genital plate with median sclerotized plate more than 1.5 times as wide as it is long...............................................  N. siamensis sp. nov.</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/63168793FFF8FFDFFF6ADD9BFA4EB5A6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich;Gorochov, Andrei V.;Tanomtong, Alongklod;Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Gorochov, Andrei V., Tanomtong, Alongklod, Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2020): Contribution to the knowledge of Rhaphidophorinae (Orthoptera: Ensifera: Rhaphidophoridae) from Thailand: three genera Neorhaphidophora, Eurhaphidophora and Minirhaphidophora. Zootaxa 4853 (2): 235-253, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4853.2.5
63168793FFF8FFD9FF6AD90EFB90B390.text	63168793FFF8FFD9FF6AD90EFB90B390.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Neorhaphidophora siamensis Dawwrueng, Gorochov	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Neorhaphidophora siamensis Dawwrueng, Gorochov et Suwannapoom  sp. nov.</p>
            <p>(Figs 1–14, 42–43, 46–47)</p>
            <p> Types.   Holotype—male ;  Southern Thailand,  Nakhon Sri Thammarat Province , Thung Song District, environs of Na Luang Sen Village, forest near stream, elevation 300 m., 28 V. 2018, coll. P. Dawwrueng (AUP-02000). Paratypes: 2 males (AUP-02001– AUP-02002), 2 females (AUP-02003– AUP-02005); same data as for holotype  . </p>
            <p>Description Male (holotype). Body smaller than all other members of this genus. Head with rostrum divided in distal half by narrow and deep furrow into a pair of tubercles which are pressed to each other and have large oblong lateral ocelli on the lateral sides (Figs 1–2); median ocellus nearly circular, slightly smaller than lateral ocelli (Fig 3). Lateral lobes of all thoracic tergites are rounded (Fig 4). Hind femur without spines except for 1 small inner spine at apex. Armament of all tibiae and hind basitarsus – ve, vi, ve, v2a / de, di, d~2, d2a, ve, ve, v2a / d19e–20i (d19e–21i), d2sa, 6a / d6c, dac; apex of dia of hind tibia projecting slightly beyond apex of dac. Abdomen with very short rounded median projection on ninth abdominal tergite; middle part of tenth abdominal tergite weakly elongated and separated by distinct transverse fold from the epiproct; epiproct with deep median fold running from base to apex, with a pair of short basal lobes (appearing in the shape of inflated convexities that touch each other in the dorsal view), and with the distal part strongly curved downwards but having an apical part (directed forwards) that is rather long and inserted deeply into the anal cavity above the paraprocts (Figs 5–8); paraprocts with roundly angular apices approximately reaching the posterior edges of the basal lobes of the epiproct (Figs 6, 7), appearing in the form of rather large plates with numerous very small spinules on the inner surface and on the posterior margin (Fig 8); genital plate somewhat transverse with distinct angular posteromedian notch and with small but elongated spiniform processes near the base of the styles, processes appear rather short but wide in the profile styles which are slightly longer than the above-mentioned spiniform processes (Figs 5–7, 9); genitalia membranous, with ventrolateral lobes slightly longer than the dorsolateral ones in a resting (compacted) condition and having thin elongated subapical lobules (Figs 42, 43). Colouration: head from above and thoracic tergites are dark brown; genae pale brown; frons brown with pale brown area along clypeal suture; clypeus brown basally, pale brown in middle part and grey apically; labrum brown; mandible dark brown with basal area pale brown; palpi yellowish-whitish with brownish longitudinal stripes; rostral tubercles dark brown; antennae dark brown with scapes that are pale brown and have dark brown spots near the base and apex; eyes are dark brown in color; ocelli whitish; legs yellowish-whitish but with dark brown distal parts of all femora and proximal parts of all tibiae, dark brown oblique stripes on the dorsal surface of the hind femur and grayish oblique stripes on its lateral surface; abdominal tergites are dark brown to brown with slightly paler lower parts and dark spots on the posterior margin of the posterior tergites; sternites are light grayish brown; epiproct and genital plate are grayish brown, but latter plate appears with pale brown styles; paraprocts are brown with a dark brown inner area and posterior edge; cerci brown with pale brown area near the base.</p>
            <p>Variations: Occasionally, frons are slightly paler, and leg armament is slightly varying.</p>
            <p>Females: General appearance similar to that of males, but dorsal part of body somewhat darker than in males, lateral ocelli more circular (Fig 11), middle part of tenth abdominal tergite shorter, epiproct distinctly smaller and simple in shape (triangularly-oval, rather narrow and with shallow median groove; Fig 12), paraprocts smaller and without spinules. Genital plate with membranous and transversely wrinkled proximal part which narrows before the distal part (Fig 13) and is drawn under the last sternite (same as in female specimens of other congeners); distal part is ventrally wide (distinctly transverse) with whitish median sclerite (plate) having a membranous area at the base and with almost a straight posterior edge (Fig 13); ovipositor appears as presented in Fig 14.</p>
            <p>Length (mm) Body 16.2–16.4 (male), 18.3–18.9 (female); pronotum 5.7–5.9 (male), 6.2-7.0 (female); fore femur 6.9–7.0 (male), 7.5–7.8 (female); hind femur 15.7–17.1 (male), 18.3–18.4 (female); hind tibia 13.7–14.6 (male), 15.9–17.4 (female); hind basitarsus 3.5–3.6 (male), 3.4–4.1 (female); ovipositor 9.5–9.6.</p>
            <p> Comparison The new species is very similar to  N. grata from the Pahang State (Malaysia) in the structure of the epiproct and male genitalia, but it is clearly distinguished by the male epiproct with convexity-like (not tuberclelike) basal lobes and a male genital plate having a distinct posteromedian notch with wider (in profile) distal halves of the styles and sclerotized distal area of the female genital plate that is more transverse. From  N. steineri , the new species strongly differs in the male epiproct with less projected basal lobes. The apical part of this epiproct appears to be much longer and is inserted into the anal (not genital) cavity, male genital plate is longer and apically notched as well as having distinctly shorter styli. From  N. valentinae , it distinctly differs in the male epiproct with significantly shorter and more rounded (in profile) basal lobes ending approximately near the paraproctal apices; male genital plate with longer spiniform tubercles near styles, and lower median sclerite at the apex of the female genital plate that is more transverse. </p>
            <p>Etymology The new species is named after “ Siam ” (the old name of Thailand).</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/63168793FFF8FFD9FF6AD90EFB90B390	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich;Gorochov, Andrei V.;Tanomtong, Alongklod;Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Gorochov, Andrei V., Tanomtong, Alongklod, Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2020): Contribution to the knowledge of Rhaphidophorinae (Orthoptera: Ensifera: Rhaphidophoridae) from Thailand: three genera Neorhaphidophora, Eurhaphidophora and Minirhaphidophora. Zootaxa 4853 (2): 235-253, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4853.2.5
63168793FFFEFFD9FF6ADA9BFDA7B689.text	63168793FFFEFFD9FF6ADA9BFDA7B689.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eurhaphidophora Gorochov 1999	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Genus  Eurhaphidophora Gorochov, 1999</p>
            <p>Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 78(1), 71.</p>
            <p> Type species:  Eurhaphidophora nataliae Gorochov, 1999 by original designation. </p>
            <p>Diagnosis. This genus is easily distinguished from other genera by the seventh and eighth abdominal tergites of the male with a short posterior lobe that is rounded or almost angular. There is the presence of a large median process on the ninth abdominal tergite of the male.</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/63168793FFFEFFD9FF6ADA9BFDA7B689	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich;Gorochov, Andrei V.;Tanomtong, Alongklod;Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Gorochov, Andrei V., Tanomtong, Alongklod, Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2020): Contribution to the knowledge of Rhaphidophorinae (Orthoptera: Ensifera: Rhaphidophoridae) from Thailand: three genera Neorhaphidophora, Eurhaphidophora and Minirhaphidophora. Zootaxa 4853 (2): 235-253, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4853.2.5
63168793FFFFFFD8FF6AD9C3FA4EB7C0.text	63168793FFFFFFD8FF6AD9C3FA4EB7C0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eurhaphidophora Gorochov 1999	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Key to Thai species of  Eurhaphidophora</p>
            <p>1. Median process of male ninth tergite slim and long (this process is approximately thrice as long as it is wide) as well as being insignificantly curved downwards........................................................................ 2</p>
            <p> - Median process of male ninth tergite is wide and short (this process is approximately one times as long as it is wide) as well as being strongly curved downwards...................................................  E. pawangkhananti sp. nov.</p>
            <p> 2. Median process of the male ninth tergite with a pair of thin ventroapical spines................  E. bispina Gorochov, 2010</p>
            <p> - Median of process of the male ninth tergite with a pair of distinctly wider and rounded lobules at the apex.........................................................................................  E. tarasovi doitungensis ssp. nov. </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/63168793FFFFFFD8FF6AD9C3FA4EB7C0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich;Gorochov, Andrei V.;Tanomtong, Alongklod;Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Gorochov, Andrei V., Tanomtong, Alongklod, Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2020): Contribution to the knowledge of Rhaphidophorinae (Orthoptera: Ensifera: Rhaphidophoridae) from Thailand: three genera Neorhaphidophora, Eurhaphidophora and Minirhaphidophora. Zootaxa 4853 (2): 235-253, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4853.2.5
63168793FFFFFFDAFF6ADB20FEFEB248.text	63168793FFFFFFDAFF6ADB20FEFEB248.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eurhaphidophora tarasovi subsp. doitungensis Dawwrueng, Gorochov	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Eurhaphidophora tarasovi doitungensis Dawwrueng, Gorochov et Suwannapoom  ssp. nov.</p>
            <p>(Figs 15–18, 48)</p>
            <p>  Types Holotype—male; Northern Thailand, Chiang Rai Province,  Mae Fah Luang District ,  Doi Tung Lodge ,  Doi Tung Development Project Area , elevation 895 m., 19 I. 2018, coll. K. Jiaranaisakul (AUP-02006)  . </p>
            <p> Description Male: Body is similar to that of E. t.  tarasovi . Head with rostral tubercles that are separated from each other by a narrow and deep furrow, and less pressed to each other; lateral ocelli are large and circular; median ocellus is small and nearly circular. The armament of the fore and mid tibiae is similar to that in the nominotypical subspecies but different in the hind tibia [d17e–d17i] and hind basitarsus [d2c (d3c), dac]. Abdomen with rather long rounded median lobe on the eighth abdominal tergite (Fig 15). The process of the ninth abdominal tergite is somewhat shorter than in the nominotypical subspecies with a wider notch between its apical lobules (Fig 15) and with more shallow longitudinal concavity on the ventral surface formed by lateral marginal parts that are less strongly bent downwards almost from the base to the apex of this process (Figs 16–18). Epiproct is also similar to that of E. t.  tarasovi , but with a pair of more angular lateral lobes (which are almost tubercle-like in profile; Fig 16), with longitudinal median concavity on the dorsoposterior surface that is wider in the middle and runs from the base to almost the apex of epiproct (Fig 17), and with a narrowed apical part that is somewhat less long (Fig 18). Genital plate is transverse and broader than it is long, and with a posterior margin that is almost straight between styli (Fig 18). Colouration is similar to that of the nominotypical subspecies but with the following differences: frons, area between rostral tubercles, eyes, antennal cavities and clypeus are darker; tergites are also darker and only the lateral parts of the abdominal tergites appear pale brown. </p>
            <p>Female unknown.</p>
            <p>Length (mm) Body 20.9; pronotum 6.6; fore femur 7.3; hind femur 18.5; hind tibia 17.2; hind basitarsus 2.9.</p>
            <p> Comparison The new subspecies is very similar to E. t.  tarasovi in general appearance but clearly differs in the above-mentioned armament of the hind tibia and hind basitarsus. The projection of the male ninth abdominal tergite is shorter and has a wider notch between its apical lobules, the narrowed apical part of the male epiproct is shorter, lateral lobes of the epiproct are smaller and more angular (tubercle-like in profile), and the male genital plate appears with a posterior margin that is almost straight between the styles. </p>
            <p>Etymology The new species is named after the location from where it was collected, Doi Tung Development Project Area.</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/63168793FFFFFFDAFF6ADB20FEFEB248	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich;Gorochov, Andrei V.;Tanomtong, Alongklod;Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Gorochov, Andrei V., Tanomtong, Alongklod, Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2020): Contribution to the knowledge of Rhaphidophorinae (Orthoptera: Ensifera: Rhaphidophoridae) from Thailand: three genera Neorhaphidophora, Eurhaphidophora and Minirhaphidophora. Zootaxa 4853 (2): 235-253, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4853.2.5
63168793FFFDFFD6FF6ADFA6FD1AB1C0.text	63168793FFFDFFD6FF6ADFA6FD1AB1C0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eurhaphidophora pawangkhananti Dawwrueng, Gorochov	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Eurhaphidophora pawangkhananti Dawwrueng, Gorochov et Suwannapoom  sp. nov.</p>
            <p>(Figs 19–31, 49–50)</p>
            <p> Types.   Holotype—male; Northern Thailand, Nan Province,  Pua District ,  Doi Phu Kha , elevation 900m., 5 X. 2018, coll. P. Dawwrueng &amp; T. Suddeepong (AUP-02007).  Paratype—female; same data as the holotype (AUP- 02008) . </p>
            <p>Description Male. Body is medium-sized. Head appears the same as the previous congener described here (Figs 19–20), but lateral ocelli are medium-sized (Fig 21). Ventral parts of the lateral lobes of the pronotum, mesonotum and metanotum are more or less broadly rounded (Fig 21). Hind femur without spines ventrally but with one distinct inner spine at the apex; armament of all tibiae and hind basitarsus – v2, ve, v2a (right fore tibia possibly damaged in nymphal stage, because it appears with only internal ventroapical spine and small spinule located very near the spur) / d2, d2a, ve, ve, v2a / d18e–19i, d2sa, 6a / d3c, dac; apex of dia of hind tibia not reaching apex of dac. Abdomen with very short rounded median projection on the eighth abdominal tergite (Fig 22); the ninth abdominal tergite is weakly sclerotized in the dorsal part, with small membranous median areas, and is entirely separated from the posterior median process. This process is wide and moderately long with a widened distal part (Figs 22, 24), strongly arcuately curved downwards, and with an apical part that is directed slightly forward (Figs 23, 25). This process also appears with a short dorsomedian ridge proximally, and with a posterior margin that is roundly angular in the dorsal view. In the posterior view, it is roundly truncated (Fig 24); the epiproct is cup-shaped, broad and rather short with an apical process that is very narrow and slightly curved forward in the lateral view (Figs 23, 25, 27, 28). The genital plate is transverse and broader than it is long with a posterior margin that is slightly concave between the styli (Fig 26).</p>
            <p>Female. General appearance the same as male, but median projection of the ninth abdominal tergite is much shorter and it appears convex in the middle part (Fig 31). Epiproct is smaller and simple in shape (triangularly-oval). Genital plate is presented in Fig 30; ovipositor is slightly curved with ventral serration in the distal part and with a narrowly rounded apex (Fig 29).</p>
            <p>Colouration. Head with reddish brown dorsum appears with five distinct dark longitudinal lines, pale brown frons and areas on the genae appear brown to pale brown on the clypeus with two dark spots, brown labrum, dark brown mandibles, yellowish-whitish palpi having brownish areas in the basal and apical parts of each segment, dark brown rostral tubercles and eyes, brown antennae having pale brown scapes, and whitish ocelli. Thoracic tergites appear to be dark brown with slightly paler lower parts. Legs (including coxae) are yellowish-whitish with dark brown distal parts of all femora and proximal parts of the tibiae, the rest of the hind femora is light brown with dark brown oblique stripes on the dorsal surface and grayish oblique stripes on the ventral surface, and whitish tarsi of all legs. Abdominal tergites and epiproct are dark brown; paraprocts are pale brown; male genital plate is brown at the basal half and pale brown at the apical half. In the female of the species, there is a genital plate that is grayish brown with a dark brown apical area; the styli of the male genital plate is pale brown with a greyish brown dorsal longitudinal stripe. Cerci is brown with pale brown areas near the base. Ovipositor is dark brown.</p>
            <p>Length (mm) Body 20.6 (male), 26.1 (female); pronotum 6.3 (male), 7.3 (female); fore femur 7.7 (male), 8.9 (female); hind femur 17.5 (male), 21 (female); hind tibia 16 (male), 19.6 (female); hind basitarsus; 3.7 (male), 3.9 (female); ovipositor 16.3.</p>
            <p> Comparison The new species is very similar to  E. orlovi in general appearance, but clearly differs in terms of the following characteristics: the process of the male ninth abdominal tergite in the dorsal view appears with almost straight lateral margins from the middle part to the apex and with a more angularly convex apical part (  E. orlovi in dorsal view has lateral margins that are arcuate and the apical part is truncated); male epiproct is shorter, broader, and with narrow apical process (in  E. orlovi , epiproct is longer, narrower, and with slightly bilobate apex); male genital plate between styli is more concave (almost straight in  E. orlovi ). Female of the new species is distinguished from that of  E. orlovi by the eighth and ninth abdominal tergites with small projections posteriorly, genital plate that is broader than it is long (without lateral lobes at the base) with short median projection, and ovipositor with a more widened apical part (female of  E. orlovi lacks any projections on the eighth and ninth tergites, with a genital plate that is longer than it is broad with long median projection, and with ovipositor having a more narrowed apical part). </p>
            <p>Etymology The new species is named after Mr. Parinya Pawangkhanant, a young Thai herpetologist who assisted in collecting specimens during fieldwork.</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/63168793FFFDFFD6FF6ADFA6FD1AB1C0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich;Gorochov, Andrei V.;Tanomtong, Alongklod;Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Gorochov, Andrei V., Tanomtong, Alongklod, Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2020): Contribution to the knowledge of Rhaphidophorinae (Orthoptera: Ensifera: Rhaphidophoridae) from Thailand: three genera Neorhaphidophora, Eurhaphidophora and Minirhaphidophora. Zootaxa 4853 (2): 235-253, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4853.2.5
63168793FFF1FFD6FF6ADD2EFCF1B583.text	63168793FFF1FFD6FF6ADD2EFCF1B583.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Minirhaphidophora Gorochov 2002	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Genus  Minirhaphidophora Gorochov, 2002</p>
            <p>Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 81(2), 332.</p>
            <p> Type species:  Minirhaphidophora minima Gorochov, 2002 , by original designation </p>
            <p> Note This genus was originally described based only on female characteristics (Gorochov, 2002). In this paper,  Minirhaphidophora is comprised of two species (type species and  M. kerinci Gorochov, 2002 ) collected from the same locality of Sumatra and separated from the other genera of  Rhaphidophorinae by a distinctly smaller body and less developed rostral tubercles. Later (Gorochov, 2010b), two additional species of this genus were discovered, namely  M. berezini Gorochov, 2010 and  M. ocellata Gorochov, 2010 . The first species was described after a single male collected from another locality in Sumatra, and  M. ocellata was described after a single female obtained from Borneo. Thus, the male of this genus was described for the first time. It clearly differs from the other genera of this subfamily via a combination of its sexual abdominal characteristics. At present, a new species of this genus was discovered in South Thailand. It is here described on the basis of both male and female specimens. However, its male sexual characteristics appear similar to the above-described male specimen with significant differences. These differences allow us to describe a new subgenus for this Thai species and to propose a new diagnosis for the genus  Minirhaphidophora . </p>
            <p>Diagnosis Body is small or very small (length of hind femur 7.8–12.7 mm). Rostral tubercles are short or very short, separated from each other by short and shallow longitudinal grooves (Figs 32, 33). Posterior part of the eight abdominal tergite in males appears with a pair of rather short angular projections or with one similar median projection (Figs 34–36), but in the female, appears with one short and rounded median lobe (Fig. 39); the ninth abdominal tergite is present with a short or very short rounded posteromedian lobe (Figs 34, 35). The male epiproct is more or less triangular with an apical part that is almost truncated but bilobate or bifurcate and curved upwards (Figs 34–37). The male paraprocts are simple, roundly angular (Figs 34, 36) and the male genital plate appears with large styles and a distinct posteromedian lobe between them (Fig. 38).</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/63168793FFF1FFD6FF6ADD2EFCF1B583	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich;Gorochov, Andrei V.;Tanomtong, Alongklod;Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Gorochov, Andrei V., Tanomtong, Alongklod, Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2020): Contribution to the knowledge of Rhaphidophorinae (Orthoptera: Ensifera: Rhaphidophoridae) from Thailand: three genera Neorhaphidophora, Eurhaphidophora and Minirhaphidophora. Zootaxa 4853 (2): 235-253, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4853.2.5
63168793FFF1FFD6FF6AD8E0FA4FB647.text	63168793FFF1FFD6FF6AD8E0FA4FB647.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Minirhaphidophora Gorochov 2002	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Key to subgenera and species of  Minirhaphidophora</p>
            <p>1. Male............................................................................................... 2</p>
            <p>- Female............................................................................................. 3</p>
            <p> 2. Eight abdominal tergite with a pair of angular projections posteriorly; the posteromedian lobe of the ninth abdominal tergite appears with a small median hook on the dorsal surface; the median part of the tenth abdominal tergite is reduced (partly membranous and without specializations); epiproct with a rather wide apical part and a bilobate apex [subgenus  Minirhaphidophora s. str. ]......................................................................................  M. berezini</p>
            <p> - Eight abdominal tergite with one posteromedian angular projection (Figs 35, 36); posteromedian lobe of the ninth abdominal tergite is present without any hooks (Figs 34, 35); median part of the tenth abdominal tergite is developed and has a pair of finger-like dorsal tubercles near each other (Figs 34–36); epiproct with a rather narrow apical part and bifurcate apex (Figs 34–37) [subgenus  Condylophora subgen. nov. ].................................................  M. ophioglossa sp. nov.</p>
            <p> 3. Genital plate with obtusely angular (almost rounded) apex..........................................  M. (M.) minima</p>
            <p>- Genital plate with distinct posteromedian spine (Fig. 40)...................................................... 4</p>
            <p> 4. Body appears comparatively large (length of hind femur about 12.7 mm).............................. M. (?)  ocellata</p>
            <p>- Body appears comparatively small (length of hind femur 7.9–9.5 mm)........................................... 5</p>
            <p> 5. Lateral ocelli appears rather large (almost as long as the space between the lateral ocellus and apex of the rostral tubercle; Fig. 33). Tenth abdominal tergite is present with a pair of small posterior lobules located near each other (Fig. 39)..........................................................................................  M. (C.) ophioglossa sp. nov.</p>
            <p> - Lateral ocelli appears to be much smaller (significantly shorter than the space between the lateral ocellus and the apex of the rostral tubercle). Tenth abdominal tergite without lobules............................................ M. (?)  kerinci</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/63168793FFF1FFD6FF6AD8E0FA4FB647	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich;Gorochov, Andrei V.;Tanomtong, Alongklod;Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Gorochov, Andrei V., Tanomtong, Alongklod, Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2020): Contribution to the knowledge of Rhaphidophorinae (Orthoptera: Ensifera: Rhaphidophoridae) from Thailand: three genera Neorhaphidophora, Eurhaphidophora and Minirhaphidophora. Zootaxa 4853 (2): 235-253, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4853.2.5
63168793FFF7FFD2FF6ADB20FE16B775.text	63168793FFF7FFD2FF6ADB20FE16B775.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Minirhaphidophora (Condylophora) Dawwrueng, Gorochov	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Subgenus  Condylophora Dawwrueng, Gorochov et Suwannapoom  subgen. nov.</p>
            <p> Type species  Minirhaphidophora (Condylophora) ophioglossa sp. nov.</p>
            <p>Diagnosis. General appearance (including size of body) is similar to that of nominotypical subgenus but with distinct differences. Rostral tubercles are rather large. Male appears with 7th–10th abdominal tergites with posterior projections following (Figs 34–36). The seventh tergite is present with short and roundly angular posteromedian lobe; the posterior margin of the eighth tergite appears with one rather large and acute posteromedian projection with a pair of slight convexities not far from it; the ninth tergite is shortened with a short and widely rounded posteromedian lobe; the tenth tergite is present with a pair of rather large and laterally compressed tubercles located near each other and a subacute apex. Female displays tergites that are similar to those of male specimens, but the projection of the eighth tergite is shorter and rounded at the apex. The projection of the ninth tergite is slightly shorter than in the male, and the tubercles of the tenth tergite are smaller and almost lobule-like (Fig. 39). Epiproct is indistinctly separated from this tergite and triangular in male specimens with an apical part that is narrow, almost truncated, curved upwards and having a bifurcate apex that is more or less similar to a snake’s tongue (Figs 34–37). In the female, the epiproct is present with a simple rounded apex (Fig. 39). The genital plate of the male is present with large (long) subcylindical styles and a moderately long posteromedian lobe between them (Fig. 38). The female genital plate is triangular with a distinct posteromedian spine (Fig. 40) and small lateroproximal lobes. The ovipositor is rather short and wide, slightly curved upwards and with an acute apex and ventral margin at the distal part of the lower valves that are distinctly serrulate (Fig. 41).</p>
            <p>Comparison Differences of this subgenus from the nominotypical specimen are provided in the key above.</p>
            <p> Etymology The new subgeneric name originated from the Latinized Greek word “condylus” (tubercle) and the generic name “  Rhaphidophora ”. This is because the male of this subgenus has a pair of characteristic tubercles on its tenth abdominal tergite. </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/63168793FFF7FFD2FF6ADB20FE16B775	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich;Gorochov, Andrei V.;Tanomtong, Alongklod;Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Gorochov, Andrei V., Tanomtong, Alongklod, Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2020): Contribution to the knowledge of Rhaphidophorinae (Orthoptera: Ensifera: Rhaphidophoridae) from Thailand: three genera Neorhaphidophora, Eurhaphidophora and Minirhaphidophora. Zootaxa 4853 (2): 235-253, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4853.2.5
63168793FFF5FFCCFF6ADAAFFE9DB071.text	63168793FFF5FFCCFF6ADAAFFE9DB071.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Minirhaphidophora (Condylophora) ophioglossa Dawwrueng, Gorochov	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Minirhaphidophora (Condylophora) ophioglossa Dawwrueng, Gorochov et Suwannapoom  sp. nov.</p>
            <p>(Figs 32–41, 44, 45, 51)</p>
            <p> Types.   Holotype—male; Thailand, Kathu Waterfall,  Thalang District , Phuket Province,  Southern Thailand , elevation 220 – 230 m., 13 XI. 2017, coll. P. Jirasuttayaporn &amp; P. Dawwrueng (AUP-02009). Paratype— 2 males (AUP-02010 – AUP-02012), 3 females (AUP-02013 – AUP-02014); same data as holotype  . </p>
            <p>Description Male (holotype). Rostral tubercles are present with subacute apices (Figs 32–33) and are well separated from each other by a rather deep longitudinal groove in the distal part (Fig 32). A pair of thin lateral furrows are present under these tubercles (Fig 33). The lateral ocelli are oval, rather large and almost as long as the space between the lateral ocellus and apex of the rostral tubercle; the median ocellus is medium-sized and subcircular. The pronotum appears with rather a long posterior lobe and is slightly concave on each posterolateral margin. The hind femur is present without spines ventrally, but with one distinct inner spine at the apex. The armament of all tibiae and hind basitarsus – v2, vi, v2a / de, d2a, ve, v2a / d23e–17i (d20e–19i), d2sa, 6a / d5c, dac; apex of dia of hind tibia considerably do not reach the apex of the dac. The abdomen appears with the shape of tergal projections as shown in Figs 34–37. Epiproct is barely protruding beyond the paraproctal apices (Fig 34) with the apical part modified as shown in Figs 34–37. Genital plate present with styles that are slightly arcuate and with a posteromedian lobe that is rather narrow and almost two times shorter than the styles and has a rounded apex (Fig 38). Genitalia entirely membranous (Figs 44, 45).</p>
            <p>Variations. Hind leg armament slightly varying.</p>
            <p>Female. General appearance similar to the male but with tergal projections and an epiproct present as shown in Fig. 39. Posteromedian spine of the genital plate is moderately elongated and narrowly triangular (i.e. with widened base), almost twice as long as it is wide (Fig 40). Ovipositor is shown in Fig 41.</p>
            <p>Colouration. Head is rufous brown in colour with brown frons and labrum, dark brown rostral tubercles, eyes, antennae and mandibles, pale brown clypeus, and yellowish white ocelli and palpi; thoracic tergites are dark brown; fore and middle legs appear with brown femora, and with a grayish brown proximal half and a light brown distal half of all tibiae; hind legs appear with a light brown femur having a brown distal area, dark brown oblique stripes on the dorsal side and grayish oblique stripes on the ventral side. Brown hind tibia and all tarsi are light brown. Abdominal tergites appear rather dark with brown epiprocts displaying male apical projections that are dark brown. Paraprocts are brown. Male genital plate is brown with pale brown styles displaying a whitish apical part; female genital plate appears pale brown. Cerci is brown with pale brown basal areas. Ovipositor light is yellowish brown with brown margins of the superior and inferior valves.</p>
            <p>Length (mm) Body: 9.3–10.4 (male), 10.5–11.7 (female); pronotum: 3.1–3.6 (male), 3.6–3.9 (female); fore femur: 3.3–3.6 (male), 3.7–4.0 (female); hind femur: 8.3–8.7 (male), 9.0–9.5 (female); hind tibia: 6.8–7.6 (male), 7.9–8.3 (female); hind basitarsus: 1.5–2.1 (male), 2.0–2.2 (female); ovipositor 4.7–5.0.</p>
            <p>Etymology The name of the new species originates from the Latinized Greek words “ophis” (snake) and “glossa” (tongue). This is because the apical part of the male epiproct in this species is more or less similar to a snake’s tongue in shape.</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/63168793FFF5FFCCFF6ADAAFFE9DB071	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich;Gorochov, Andrei V.;Tanomtong, Alongklod;Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Gorochov, Andrei V., Tanomtong, Alongklod, Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2020): Contribution to the knowledge of Rhaphidophorinae (Orthoptera: Ensifera: Rhaphidophoridae) from Thailand: three genera Neorhaphidophora, Eurhaphidophora and Minirhaphidophora. Zootaxa 4853 (2): 235-253, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4853.2.5
