identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
5132290172341561FF2EFD3BFA06FE5B.text	5132290172341561FF2EFD3BFA06FE5B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cis matchanus Reitter 1915	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Cis matchanus Reitter, 1915 stat. nov.</p>
            <p>(Figs 1–5)</p>
            <p> Reitter (1915) described  Cis lineatocribratus v. matchanus , a variety of  Cis lineatocribratus Mellié, 1849 on the basis of specimens from the current area of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Čelič), Romania, Georgia (Tbatani) and Azerbaijan (Talysh Mts.). </p>
            <p> According to Reitter (1915),  Cis lineatocribratus v. matchanus differs from the typical form in the sculpture of the elytra. Whereas in the typical form the rows of points on the elytra are coarse and deep and the interspaces are occupied by only a few, barely visible points and usually appear smooth, the rows of points in  Cis lineatocribratus v. matchanus are somewhat less strongly and deeply pronounced but the spaces between them have dense and fine points. Thus, the sculpture of the elytra is more similar to that in  Cis jacquemartii and  Cis castaneus . But the coarser points on the elytra of these both species do not form distinct rows.  Cis lineatocribratus v. matchanus has the clypeus with two teeth that are sharper than in the typical form. Its large, arched, laterally rounded pronotum, whose lateral margins are not visible from above, permits one to identify this form as  Cis lineatocribratus . </p>
            <p> From my examinations of specimens of the type series, including both external and male genitalia morphology (Figs 3–5), I was able to conclude that the species is distinct from  Cis lineatocribratus and conspecific with  Cis hanseni Strand, 1965 . As a result, the following synonymy should be established: </p>
            <p> Cis matchanus Reitter, 1915 stat. nov.</p>
            <p> =  Cis lineatocribratus v. matchanus Reitter, 1915: 66</p>
            <p> =  Cis hanseni Strand, 1965: 61 syn. nov.</p>
            <p> An appropriate description of  C. matchanus (under the name  Cis hanseni ) was given by Strand (1965) along with the key to the determination of all European species related to  Cis castaneus and drawings of details of the pronotum and male terminalia. </p>
            <p> Type specimens studied (coll. HNHM). Lectotype by present designation: ♂, [p] Čelič, Bosn. Jar. Matcha. // handwritten text “  Matchanus m.  lineatocribratus var.” // rectangular label with a red border, “ Holotypus ” printed in red and the handwritten text “  Cis lineatocribratus v. Matchanus Reitter 1915 ” // [p] Coll. Reitter—Fig. 1, original labelling: Fig. 5. Paralectotypes: 1♂ 1♀, the same data as lectotype; 1♂, [p] Rumaenia Reitter // rectangular label with a red border, “ Paratypus ” printed in red and the handwritten text “  Cis lineatocribratus v. Matchanus Reitter 1915 ” // [p] Coll. Reitter; 1♀, [p] Caucasus Tbatani [18]79 Leder, (Reitter) // [the same label as in the previous paralectotype] // [p] Coll. Reitter; 2♂ 1♀, [p] Talysch Reitter. // [the same label as in the previous paralectotype] // [p] Coll. Reitter. </p>
            <p> It should be noted that Reitter did not designate the holotype. In the late 1940s (O. Merkl, personal information), all syntypes of  C. lineatocribratus v. matchanus and five other specimens from Reitter’s collection were marked with red framed labels, on which the words “ Holotypus ” and “ Paratypus ” were printed in red ink, whereas the name of the taxon, the name of the author and the year of description were written by hand. </p>
            <p> I am not certain whether I managed to locate all the specimens belonging to the typical series because Reitter (1915) did not state the number of specimens which he used to describe the species. Fortunately, however, the specimens I was able to examine come from all the localities listed by Reitter in his paper of 1915. One male specimen is designated here as the lectotype in order to preserve nomenclatural stability. Among the five specimens not belonging to the type series and marked with a rectangular red-bordered label with “ Paratypus ” printed in red and the handwritten text “  Cis lineatocribratus v. Matchanus Reitter 1915 ” is 1♂  Cis jacquemartii Mellié, 1849 : Bosnien. Reitter. Leder. Coll. Reitter, det. A. Kompanzev, conf. RK. The data relating to the other four specimens are given below. </p>
            <p> Further specimens examined. Bosnia and Herzegovina: 1♂ 1♀, Bosnien. Reitter. Leder., [rectangular label with a red border, “ Paratypus ” printed in red and the handwritten text “  Cis lineatocribratus v. Matchanus Reitter 1915 ”] (coll. HNHM); Czech Republic: 33♂ 46♀, Boh. mer., N. Obora, Libochovka, env. Hluboká n. Vlt., 28.IV.1981, Exk. N. Mus. Praha, I. Kovář &amp; H. Studničková (coll. NMPC); 1♂, Mor., Ranšpurk, ob. Soutok, 19.IX.1989, leg. S. Bílý &amp; H. Studničková (coll. NMPC); Iran: 51♂ 54♀, Chalus, Elburs, 19.II.1966, leg. A. Warchałowski (coll. MNHW); Georgia: 1♂, Caucasus. Meskisch Gb. [= Meskhetskiy Khrebet], Leder Reitter, [rectangular label with a red border, “ Paratypus ” printed in red and the handwritten text “  Cis lineatocribratus v. Matchanus Reitter 1915 ”] (coll. HNHM); Italy: 7♂ 7♀, Basilicata, Pollino, Terranova P. (PZ), Duglia, 16.VI.1985; 1♂ 5♀, Basilicata, Pollino, San Sev. Luc. (PZ), b. Magnano, 800 m amsl, 13.IV.1996; 2♂ [the same loc.], 15.VI.2003; 1♂ 3♀, Basilicata, Accettura, b. Gallipoli-Cogn. (MT), 800 m amsl, 29.IX.2002; 1♀, Basilicata, Accettura, b. Montepiano (MT), 900 m amsl, 29.IX.2002; 1♂, Puglia, Gargano, Foresta Umbra (FG), 3.III.2000; leg. et coll. FA; Caucasus: 1♂, Kaukas Leder, [rectangular label with a red border, “ Paratypus ” printed in red and the handwritten text “  Cis lineatocribratus v. Matchanus Reitter 1915 ”] (coll. HNHM); Poland: 1♂, Bieszczady, Smerek ad Wetlina, 27.VII.2002, leg. RK (coll. RK); Russia: 1♀, Daghestan, Leder. Reitter. (coll. HNHM); Turkey: 1♀, Prov. Bolu, 10 km S of Bolu, 40o39’N / 31o37’E, 30.V.2002, leg. RK (coll. RK); Ukraine: 1♂, Kuzy, Podk. Rus, 8.[19]31, leg. Dr. Klička (coll. NMPC). </p>
            <p> Distribution.  Cis matchanus (as  Cis hanseni ) has been recorded from Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Norway, Poland, Russia (both the northern and southern parts of European Russia) and Switzerland (Strand 1965, Królik 1999, Callot &amp; Reibnitz 2008, Jelínek 2008, Reibnitz et al. 2013). It turns out that it is widely distributed in southern and eastern Europe (Bosnia &amp; Herzegovina, the Czech Republic, Italy, Romania, Ukraine), in Asia Minor (Turkey) and the Caucasus (Georgia), reaching the coast of the Caspian Sea at Mt. Talysh and Alborz (Azerbaijan, Iran). </p>
            <p> Based on previous reports and my own observations, this species occurs in northern Europe and in foothills and mountainous areas with warmer climates. It is found in the fruiting bodies of  Fomes (Fr.) Fr. , sometimes lying on the ground, together with  C. castaneus ,  C. jacquemartii and  C. lineatocribratus , with which it can be confused. </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5132290172341561FF2EFD3BFA06FE5B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Królik, Roman	Królik, Roman (2016): Two new species and nomenclatural changes in the Cis castaneus species group (Coleoptera, Ciidae). Zootaxa 4114 (4): 492-500, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4114.4.9
5132290172361566FF2EFDE0FB47F821.text	5132290172361566FF2EFDE0FB47F821.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cis lasoni	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Cis lasoni sp. nov.</p>
            <p>(Figs 6–12)</p>
            <p> Differential diagnosis.  Cis lasoni sp. nov. is allied to  Cis jacquemartii and  Cis glabratus , but its mean TL is lower. In shape, the body most closely resembles that of  Cis jacquemartii , and the shape of the anterolateral angles of the pronotum is like that in  Cis glabratus . The dorsal setation is much more pronounced than in  Cis jacquemartii but is not as readily visible as in  Cis glabratus . From both of these  Cis lasoni sp. nov. is distinguished by the shiny region along the fronto-clypeal suture, devoid of any microstructure; in males by the fronto-clypeal ridge, which is not armed with any projections, the bigger and densely setose, oval patch on the first abdominal sternite, and the morphology of the male genitalia: the apical internal processes of the tegmen is more expanded and more diagonally truncate at the top, the penis tapers distinctly to a sharp point and extends farther to the apex than in either of the other two species. </p>
            <p>Description. Holotype. ♂ Measurements in mm: TL 1.68; PL 0.57; PW 0.64; EL 1.11; EW 0.72; GD 0.65. Ratios: PL/PW 0.89; EL/EW 1.54; EL/PL 1.96; GD/EW 0.90; TL/EW 2.32. Body (Figs 6–7) elongate, subcylindrical; dorsal and ventral surface dark brown with slightly paler elytra; antennae, mouthparts, legs, and other ventral sclerites yellowish brown; dorsal and ventral sides of body bearing very short, fine, sparsely distributed hairs that are inconspicuous and hardly visible at medium magnification (starting at x40). Only the middle parts of the sternites have longer hairs. Head extending relatively far from pronotum, weakly convex; fronto-clypeal ridge not produced forwards; surface of head minutely punctate, distinctly shagreened except for a shiny region along the fronto-clypeal suture. Antennae 10-segmented; 3rd segment 1.75 times as long as 4th; 8th to 10th forming a loose club; CL/FL 0.757. Pronotum widest behind the middle; anterior margin broadly rounded; anterior corners obtusely angulate, hind angles broadly rounded in lateral view (Fig. 8); lateral margins slightly reflexed and visible from above in posterior half; sides nearly arcuate; basal margin narrowly ridged; disc irregularly and conspicuously punctate; punctures uniform in size, small, separated by a distance equal to about 2 to 3 times their diameters; interstices between punctures distinctly reticulate. Scutellum subtriangular, with some small punctures. Elytra subparallel, slightly divergent from base to two-thirds, then gradually convergent apically; surface shiny, rather closely and irregularly punctate; punctures of two sizes, the larger ones shallow and umbiliform, distinctly larger than those on pronotum, the smaller ones very small and inconspicuous. Prosternum in front of coxae medio-longitudinally carinate, transversely and somewhat deeply depressed before each coxa; prosternal process rather narrow, subparallel-sided. Each protibia with a toothed outer apical angle. First abdominal ventrite bearing large, oval patch, densely setose, its greatest diameter one-third the length of the ventrite at the middle (Fig. 7).</p>
            <p>Male genitalia and pre-genital segment (paratype). 8th abdominal tergite with apical margin widely rounded and armed with relatively long hairs that become ever shorter towards the sides (Fig. 9); 8th abdominal sternite subtrapezoidal, with apical margin weakly emarginate in the middle, armed with relatively long hairs at the lateral corners (Fig. 10). Tegmen rather stout, expanding to the apex, apical internal processes expanded and diagonally truncate at the top, longer than external processes (Fig. 11); penis distinctly extending to three-quarters of its length, then tapering to a sharp point (Fig. 12).</p>
            <p>Females. Similar to males, but devoid of the abdominal sex patch.</p>
            <p>Type material. Holotype: ♂, Azerbaijan: Talysh Mts., Lerik rayonu, 2 km N of Peştətük, 38o46’N / 48o34’E, 372 m amsl, 2–3.VI.2010, leg. RK (coll. USMB). Paratypes: 1♂ 2♀, the same data as holotype; 1♀, Talysh Mts., Lerik rayonu, 2 km N of Lerik, Xiramo env., 38o48’N / 48o25’E, 940 m amsl, 7–10.V.2014, leg. RK; 1♂ 1♀, Iran: Alborz Mts., Golestān Prov., 11 km SE of Minudasht, 37o10’N / 55o28’E, 447 m amsl, 13–15.VI.2015, leg. RK (coll. RK, RR).</p>
            <p>Variation. Males, measurements in mm (n=3 including holotype): TL 1.68–1.70 (1.69 ±0.02); PL 0.57 (±0.01); PW 0.64 (±0.01); EL 1.11–1.12 (1.12 ±0.01); EW 0.72–0.74 (0.73 ±0.01); GD 0.65–0.66 (0.65 ±0.01). Ratios: PL/PW 0.89–0.90 (0.90 ±0.03); EL/EW 1.52–1.53 (1.53 ±0.03); EL/PL 1.93-1.96 (1.94 ±0.05); GD/EW 0.89-0.90 (0.89 ±0.03); TL/EW 2.31–2.33 (2.32 ±0.06).</p>
            <p>Females, measurements in mm (n=4): TL 1.55–1.87 (1.67 ±0.02); PL 0.54–0.64 (0.57 ±0.01); PW 0.59–0.65 (0.64 ±0.01); EL 1.01–1.24 (1.10 ±0.01); EW 0.68–0.74 (0.73 ±0.01); GD 0.60–0.69 (0.65 ±0.01). Ratios: PL/PW 0.87–0.91 (0.89 ±0.03); EL/EW 1.46–1.55 (1.51 ±0.03); EL/PL 1.88–2.02 (1.94 ±0.05); GD/EW 0.87–0.93 (0.90 ±0.03); TL/EW 2.22–2.34 (2.30 ±0.06).</p>
            <p> Distribution and habitat. This species is known only from deciduous, broadleaved forests on the lower slopes of the Talysh (Azerbaijan) (Fig. 21) and Alborz Mts. (Iran) (Fig. 22) with oriental beech  Fagus orientalis Lipsky , chestnut-leaved oak  Quercus castaneifolia C. A. Mey. , European hornbeam  Carpinus betulus L. and Caucasian zelkova Zelkova carpinifolia (Pall.) K. Koch. Host fungi unknown. </p>
            <p> Etymology. I dedicate the new species to my friend, Andrzej Lasoń (Białystok, Poland), a specialist in  Kateretidae and  Nitidulidae (Coleoptera) and my companion in many entomological expeditions. </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5132290172361566FF2EFDE0FB47F821	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Królik, Roman	Królik, Roman (2016): Two new species and nomenclatural changes in the Cis castaneus species group (Coleoptera, Ciidae). Zootaxa 4114 (4): 492-500, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4114.4.9
5132290172301564FF2EFF54FA9FFF5E.text	5132290172301564FF2EFF54FA9FFF5E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cis lugowoji	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Cis lugowoji sp. nov.</p>
            <p>(Figs 13–20)</p>
            <p> Differential diagnosis.  Cis lugowoji sp. nov. is allied to  Cis lineatocribratus in the shape of the pronotum and the seriate punctures on the elytral disc. On average, however, it is smaller; moreover, it differs in its pronotal lateral margin, which, in the dorsal view, is visible over a greater length than in the latter species; the regularly convex clypeus without any transverse depression; in males by the fronto-clypeal ridge which is not armed with any projections, the oval patch on the first abdominal ventrite and the morphology of the male genitalia: the external processes of the tegmen extend almost to the middle of the subtriangular lobes of the internal processes, with the penis tapering more towards the top. </p>
            <p>Description. Holotype. ♂ Measurements in mm: TL 1.45; PL 0.52; PW 0.57; EL 0,93; EW 0.66; GD 0.59. Ratios: PL/PW 0.91; EL/EW 1.41; EL/PL 1.79; GD/EW 0.89; TL/EW 2.20. Body (Figs 13–14) oblong; dorsal and ventral surface light brown with slightly paler pronotum and humeral neighbours of elytra; antennae, mouthparts, legs and other ventral sclerites yellowish brown; dorsal side at most without pubescence, sparsely distributed, short hairs visible only near anterior margin of pronotum and elytral apex; ventral side of body bearing very short, fine, sparsely distributed hairs which are inconspicuous and hardly visible under medium magnification (starting with x40). Head relatively exposed from pronotum, weakly convex; fronto-clypeal ridge not produced forwards; surface of head minutely punctate, shiny and slightly shagreened. Antennae 10-segmented; 3rd segment 1.85 times as long as 4th; 8th to 10th forming a loose club; CL/FL 0.737. Pronotum widest in the middle; anterior margin broadly rounded; anterior corners obtusely angulate, hind angles broadly rounded in lateral view (Fig. 15); lateral margins slightly reflexed and visible from above in basal three-quarters; sides nearly arcuate; dorsum irregularly, somewhat closely and conspicuously punctate; punctures uniform in size, rather small, separated by a distance equal to about 1–3 times their diameters; interstices between punctures reticulate. Scutellum small, subtriangular, shiny, with some inconspicuous punctures. Elytra sides slightly divergent from base to basal two-thirds, then rather sharply convergent apicad; surface strongly shiny; punctures on disc in dual size, the larger ones umbiliform, seriate, interstices between larger punctures in irregular rows separated by a distance equal to about 1–1.5 times their diameters; the smaller ones very shallow and inconspicuous. Prosternum in front of coxae medio-longitudinally carinate, transversely and somewhat deeply depressed before each coxa; presternal process rather narrow, subparallel-sided. Each protibia with the spinose apex outer apical angle. First abdominal ventrite bearing large, oval patch, densely setose, its greatest diameter one-third the length of the ventrite at the middle (Fig. 14).</p>
            <p>Male genitalia and pregenital segment (paratype). 8th abdominal tergite with apical margin strongly rounded and armed with relatively long hairs (Fig. 16); 8th abdominal sternite subtrapezoidal, with apical margin deep emarginate in the middle, armed with relatively long hairs at the lateral corners (Fig. 17). Tegmen rather stout, expanding to the apex, apical internal processes expanded and subtriangular, longer than external processes (Fig. 18); penis distinctly extending to four-fifths the length, then tapers towards the apex. (Fig. 19).</p>
            <p>Females. Similar to males, but devoid of the abdominal sex patch.</p>
            <p> Type material. Holotype: ♂, Azerbaijan: Talysh Mts., Lerik rayonu, 2 km N of Peştətük, 38o46’N / 48o34’E, 372 m amsl, 2–3.VI.2010, leg. RK (coll. USMB). Paratypes: 6♂ 2♀, the same data as holotype (coll. RK, RR); 1♀, [p] Lenkoran, Leder (Reitter). // rectangular label with handwritten text “  Cis lineatocribratus Mell. ” and printed “Coll. Reitter”, original labelling: Fig. 20 (coll. HNHM)— Reitter (1901) probably used this specimen to record  C. lineatocribratus from Lenkoran. </p>
            <p>Variation. Males, measurements in mm (n=7 including holotype): TL 1.41-1.52 (1.46 ±0.02); PL 0.50–0.54 (0.52 ±0.01); PW 0.56–0.60 (0.58 ±0.01); EL 0.90–1.00 (0.94 ±0.01); EW 0.64–0.69 (0.66 ±0.01); GD 0.56–0.61 (0.58 ±0.01). Ratios: PL/PW 0.87–0.91 (0.90 ±0.03); EL/EW 1.36–1.47 (1.42 ±0.04); EL/PL 1.74–1.90 (1.82 ±0.05); GD/EW 0.85–0.90 (0.89 ±0.03); TL/EW 2.15–2.25 (2.20 ±0.06).</p>
            <p>Females, measurements in mm (n=3): TL 1.52–1.60 (1.57 ±0.02); PL 0.57–0.58 (0.58 ±0.01); PW 0.62–0.66 (0.64 ±0.01); EL 0.95–1.02 (0.99 ±0.01); EW 0.69–0.71 (0.70 ±0.01); GD 0.61–0.65 (0.63 ±0.01). Ratios: PL/PW 0.88–0.93 (0.90 ±0.03); EL/EW 1.38–1.44 (1.41 ±0.03); EL/PL 1.65–1.78 (1.71 ±0.05); GD/EW 0.89–0.91 (0.90 ±0.03); TL/EW 2.21–2.25 (2.22 ±0.06).</p>
            <p> Distribution and habitat. The species is known only from the Talysh Mts. (Azerbaijan) (Fig. 21). All the specimens collected by the author were reared in October 2011 from fruiting bodies of  Fomes sp., growing on the trunk of oriental beech (  Fagus orientalis ). </p>
            <p> Etymology. I dedicate this new species to my friend, Jerzy Ługowoj (Hajnówka, Poland), a specialist in  Buprestidae and  Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) and my companion in many entomological expeditions. </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5132290172301564FF2EFF54FA9FFF5E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Królik, Roman	Królik, Roman (2016): Two new species and nomenclatural changes in the Cis castaneus species group (Coleoptera, Ciidae). Zootaxa 4114 (4): 492-500, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4114.4.9
513229017233156AFF2EFA59FD6CFF73.text	513229017233156AFF2EFA59FD6CFF73.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cis castaneus (Herbst 1793) Herbst 1793	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> The  Cis castaneus (Herbst, 1793) species group </p>
            <p> The species belonging to the  Cis castaneus group, previously known as  Cis nitidus are morphologically distinct from other species of the genus  Cis Latreille, 1796 and seem to represent a monophyletic group (Jelínek 2007). For this reason it was given a rank varying between the discrete genus Eridaulus Thomson, 1863 (Lawrence 1965), the subgenus Eridaulus (Reitter 1901, 1915; Strand 1965) and species group (Lohse 1965, Lawrence 1971, Kawanabe, 1997). However, when this group is treated as a genus-group taxon, Eridaulus is not available as its name, for reasons mentioned by Jelínek (2007). These species are characterised by the following main features: body oblong, strongly convex with shining body surface; vestiture usually consisting of short, fine hairs; head moderately declined, partly covered by pronotum; fronto-clypeal ridge in male produced on each side forming two flat, rounded, triangular plates or forming two long horn-like projections; pronotum strongly convex, variously margined laterally, anterior angles rounded to produced and acute; anterior edge in male simple or produced and emarginate; elytra with dual punctation, consisting of larger nude macropunctures, and smaller setiferous micropunctures, the punctures uniform or seriate; prosternum relatively short, concave laterally and carinate medially; intercoxal process relatively narrow but not laminate, subacute at apex; protibia expanded at apex, outer apical angle produced and dentate; first abdominal ventrite of male with median pubescent fovea or patch (Lawrence 1965, 1971; Kawanabe 1997). </p>
            <p> Cis lasoni and  Cis lugowoji share most of the features of the  Cis castaneus group, although none of them has the modified fronto-clypeal ridge. The males of both species have the fronto-clypeal ridge devoid of any plates or projections, resembling the same structure in females. </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/513229017233156AFF2EFA59FD6CFF73	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Królik, Roman	Królik, Roman (2016): Two new species and nomenclatural changes in the Cis castaneus species group (Coleoptera, Ciidae). Zootaxa 4114 (4): 492-500, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4114.4.9
