taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
45376A353254B04CFF7CFD81234FF84E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4529217/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529217	FIGURE 1. Historical illustrations of Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881, modified after the original account. A. Whole colony. B. Hydrotheca. C. Whole phylactocarp seen laterally. D. Cross section through the phylactocarp.	FIGURE 1. Historical illustrations of Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881, modified after the original account. A. Whole colony. B. Hydrotheca. C. Whole phylactocarp seen laterally. D. Cross section through the phylactocarp.	2021-02-09	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide		Zenodo	biologists	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide			
45376A353254B04CFF7CFD81234FF84E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4529219/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529219	FIGURE 2. Four preserved, fertile colonies of Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881 (unbranched morphotype). Scale bar: 1 cm.	FIGURE 2. Four preserved, fertile colonies of Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881 (unbranched morphotype). Scale bar: 1 cm.	2021-02-09	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide		Zenodo	biologists	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide			
45376A353254B04CFF7CFD81234FF84E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4529221/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529221	FIGURE 3. Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881 (unbranched morphotype). A. Portion of monosiphonic part of stem with proximal parts of three consecutive cladia. B. Detail of a cladial apophysis, showing mamelon and one of the axillar nematothecae. C. Two cladial internodes. D. Proximal part of a cladial internode, showing mesial nematotheca. E. Distal part of a cladial internode, showing lateral nematotheca, thickening of the adaxial hydrothecal wall, and the intranodal ridges. F. Ramulus of phylactocarp with a gonotheca. Scale bars: B, D, E = 100 µm; C = 200 µm; A = 400 µm; F = 500 µm.	FIGURE 3. Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881 (unbranched morphotype). A. Portion of monosiphonic part of stem with proximal parts of three consecutive cladia. B. Detail of a cladial apophysis, showing mamelon and one of the axillar nematothecae. C. Two cladial internodes. D. Proximal part of a cladial internode, showing mesial nematotheca. E. Distal part of a cladial internode, showing lateral nematotheca, thickening of the adaxial hydrothecal wall, and the intranodal ridges. F. Ramulus of phylactocarp with a gonotheca. Scale bars: B, D, E = 100 µm; C = 200 µm; A = 400 µm; F = 500 µm.	2021-02-09	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide		Zenodo	biologists	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide			
45376A353254B04CFF7CFD81234FF84E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4529225/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529225	FIGURE 4. SEM study of Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881, unbranched morphotype (part). A. Portion of stem, showing its fascicled condition. B. Portions of cladia. C. Two cladial internodes. D. Whole phylactocarp. E, F. Proximal part of a phylactocarp at different magnifications. All from sample MNHN-IK-2015-617. Scale bars: C = 100 µm; B = 200 µm; A, F = 500 µm; E = 1 mm; D = 2 mm.	FIGURE 4. SEM study of Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881, unbranched morphotype (part). A. Portion of stem, showing its fascicled condition. B. Portions of cladia. C. Two cladial internodes. D. Whole phylactocarp. E, F. Proximal part of a phylactocarp at different magnifications. All from sample MNHN-IK-2015-617. Scale bars: C = 100 µm; B = 200 µm; A, F = 500 µm; E = 1 mm; D = 2 mm.	2021-02-09	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide		Zenodo	biologists	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide			
45376A353254B04CFF7CFD81234FF84E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4529230/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529230	FIGURE 5. SEM study of Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881, unbranched morphotype (continued). A. Detail of an empty phylactocarp. B. Portion of a phylactocarp bearing gonothecae. C. Gonothecae, greatly enlarged. D. Three insertions of gonothecae on the proximal, adaxial side of a ramulus. E. Detail of adjacent ramuli. F. Distal end of a phylactocarp seen apically. All from sample MNHN-IK-2015-617. Scale bars: D = 50 µm; E = 100 µm; B, C = 200 µm; A, F = 500 µm.	FIGURE 5. SEM study of Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881, unbranched morphotype (continued). A. Detail of an empty phylactocarp. B. Portion of a phylactocarp bearing gonothecae. C. Gonothecae, greatly enlarged. D. Three insertions of gonothecae on the proximal, adaxial side of a ramulus. E. Detail of adjacent ramuli. F. Distal end of a phylactocarp seen apically. All from sample MNHN-IK-2015-617. Scale bars: D = 50 µm; E = 100 µm; B, C = 200 µm; A, F = 500 µm.	2021-02-09	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide		Zenodo	biologists	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide			
45376A353254B04CFF7CFD81234FF84E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4529306/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529306	FIGURE 6. Preserved colony of Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881 (branched morphotype). Scale bar: 2 cm.	FIGURE 6. Preserved colony of Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881 (branched morphotype). Scale bar: 2 cm.	2021-02-09	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide		Zenodo	biologists	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide			
45376A353254B04CFF7CFD81234FF84E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4529238/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529238	FIGURE 7. Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881, branched morphotype. A. Portion of stem with insertions of two consecutive cladia. B. Detail of a cladial apophysis of stem. C. Proximal part of a cladium from a side branch. D. Detail of a cladial apophysis of branch. E–F. Hydrothecae from cladia of stem (E) and branch (F). G–J. Mesial and lateral nematothecae of hydrothecae from stem (G and H, respectively) and branch (I and J, respectively). K, L. Phylactocarp seen laterally (K) and apically (L). M. Gonotheca. Scale bars: B, D, G–J, M = 100 µm; A, C, E, F, K, L = 200 µm.	FIGURE 7. Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881, branched morphotype. A. Portion of stem with insertions of two consecutive cladia. B. Detail of a cladial apophysis of stem. C. Proximal part of a cladium from a side branch. D. Detail of a cladial apophysis of branch. E–F. Hydrothecae from cladia of stem (E) and branch (F). G–J. Mesial and lateral nematothecae of hydrothecae from stem (G and H, respectively) and branch (I and J, respectively). K, L. Phylactocarp seen laterally (K) and apically (L). M. Gonotheca. Scale bars: B, D, G–J, M = 100 µm; A, C, E, F, K, L = 200 µm.	2021-02-09	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide		Zenodo	biologists	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide			
45376A353254B04CFF7CFD81234FF84E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4529240/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529240	FIGURE 8. Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881, branched morphotype. A. Hydrotheca, image obtained by stacking. B. Distal part of a branch, showing one row of cladia (the opposite one was removed) and three consecutive phylactocarps (ph = phylacrocarp; hc = hydrocladium; a.t. = auxiliary tube of the branch). C. detail of a phylactocarp, image obtained by stacking. Scale bars: A = 100 µm; C = 200 µm; B = 300 µm.	FIGURE 8. Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881, branched morphotype. A. Hydrotheca, image obtained by stacking. B. Distal part of a branch, showing one row of cladia (the opposite one was removed) and three consecutive phylactocarps (ph = phylacrocarp; hc = hydrocladium; a.t. = auxiliary tube of the branch). C. detail of a phylactocarp, image obtained by stacking. Scale bars: A = 100 µm; C = 200 µm; B = 300 µm.	2021-02-09	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide		Zenodo	biologists	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide			
45376A353254B04CFF7CFD81234FF84E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4529254/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529254	FIGURE 15. Phylogenetic trees showing the relationship among Plumulariidae species according to 16S rRNA (A) and multilocus (B) analyses.Numbers at nodes represent the Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) and the maximum likelihood bootstrap values (BS), and are shown only when both BPP ± 0.9 and BS ± 75. Newly-produced sequences are highlighted in yellow.	FIGURE 15. Phylogenetic trees showing the relationship among Plumulariidae species according to 16S rRNA (A) and multilocus (B) analyses.Numbers at nodes represent the Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) and the maximum likelihood bootstrap values (BS), and are shown only when both BPP ± 0.9 and BS ± 75. Newly-produced sequences are highlighted in yellow.	2021-02-09	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide		Zenodo	biologists	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide			
45376A353259B054FF7CFEE121FBFE4F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4529242/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529242	FIGURE 9. Historical illustrations of Aglaophenia trifida L. Agassiz, 1862, modified after Allman (1877, as A. rigida). A. Whole colony. B, C. Three successive cormidia in lateral (B) and frontal (C) aspects. D. Female corbula.	FIGURE 9. Historical illustrations of Aglaophenia trifida L. Agassiz, 1862, modified after Allman (1877, as A. rigida). A. Whole colony. B, C. Three successive cormidia in lateral (B) and frontal (C) aspects. D. Female corbula.	2021-02-09	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide		Zenodo	biologists	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide			
45376A353259B054FF7CFEE121FBFE4F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4529244/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529244	FIGURE 10. Three preserved, fertile colonies of Aglaophenia trifida L. Agassiz, 1862. Scale bar: 2 cm.	FIGURE 10. Three preserved, fertile colonies of Aglaophenia trifida L. Agassiz, 1862. Scale bar: 2 cm.	2021-02-09	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide		Zenodo	biologists	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide			
45376A353259B054FF7CFEE121FBFE4F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4529246/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529246	FIGURE 11. Aglaophenia trifida L. Agassiz, 1862. A. Frontal view of a stem internode showing a cladial apophysis and its associated nematothecae B. Apical view of the same, showing details of the axil. C–E. Hydrotheca seen laterally (C), frontally (D) and apically (E). F. Two adjacent costae of the male corbula. G. Proximal most, free costae of the female corbula. H. Cross section through the female corbula, showing one costa. Scale bars: C–E = 100 µm; A, B, F–H = 200 µm.	FIGURE 11. Aglaophenia trifida L. Agassiz, 1862. A. Frontal view of a stem internode showing a cladial apophysis and its associated nematothecae B. Apical view of the same, showing details of the axil. C–E. Hydrotheca seen laterally (C), frontally (D) and apically (E). F. Two adjacent costae of the male corbula. G. Proximal most, free costae of the female corbula. H. Cross section through the female corbula, showing one costa. Scale bars: C–E = 100 µm; A, B, F–H = 200 µm.	2021-02-09	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide		Zenodo	biologists	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide			
45376A353259B054FF7CFEE121FBFE4F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4529248/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529248	FIGURE 12. SEM photomicrographs of the trophosome of Aglaophenia trifida L. Agassiz, 1862. A. Portion of stem, showing the structure of internodes. B–C. Portions of cladia. D. Hydrotheca seen laterally, to show the shape of its nematothecae. E. Hydrotheca in three-quarter view, to show its rim. F. Two consecutive cormidia, showing the shape of the apertures of the nematothecae. A, C, E from sample MNHN-IK-2015-626; B, D, F from sample MNHN-IK-2015-627. Scale bars: F = 20 µm; C–E = 100 µm; A, B = 200 µm.	FIGURE 12. SEM photomicrographs of the trophosome of Aglaophenia trifida L. Agassiz, 1862. A. Portion of stem, showing the structure of internodes. B–C. Portions of cladia. D. Hydrotheca seen laterally, to show the shape of its nematothecae. E. Hydrotheca in three-quarter view, to show its rim. F. Two consecutive cormidia, showing the shape of the apertures of the nematothecae. A, C, E from sample MNHN-IK-2015-626; B, D, F from sample MNHN-IK-2015-627. Scale bars: F = 20 µm; C–E = 100 µm; A, B = 200 µm.	2021-02-09	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide		Zenodo	biologists	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide			
45376A353259B054FF7CFEE121FBFE4F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4529250/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529250	FIGURE 13. SEM photomicrographs of the male corbula of Aglaophenia trifida L. Agassiz, 1862. A. General view. B. Distal portion. C–F. Details of the ribs in different views at various magnifications.All from sample MNHN-IK-2015-627. Scale bars: C–F = 200 µm; B = 500 µm; A = 1 mm.	FIGURE 13. SEM photomicrographs of the male corbula of Aglaophenia trifida L. Agassiz, 1862. A. General view. B. Distal portion. C–F. Details of the ribs in different views at various magnifications.All from sample MNHN-IK-2015-627. Scale bars: C–F = 200 µm; B = 500 µm; A = 1 mm.	2021-02-09	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide		Zenodo	biologists	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide			
45376A353259B054FF7CFEE121FBFE4F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4529252/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529252	FIGURE 14. SEM photomicrographs of the female corbula of Aglaophenia trifida L. Agassiz, 1862. A, B. General views. C–F. Details of the proximal (C), central (E) and distal (D, abaxial view; F, adaxial view) parts of the corbula.All from sample MNHN-IK-2015-626. Scale bars: C–F = 200 µm; A, B = 500 µm.	FIGURE 14. SEM photomicrographs of the female corbula of Aglaophenia trifida L. Agassiz, 1862. A, B. General views. C–F. Details of the proximal (C), central (E) and distal (D, abaxial view; F, adaxial view) parts of the corbula.All from sample MNHN-IK-2015-626. Scale bars: C–F = 200 µm; A, B = 500 µm.	2021-02-09	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide		Zenodo	biologists	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide			
45376A353259B054FF7CFEE121FBFE4F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4529256/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529256	FIGURE 16. 16S rRNA phylogenetic tree showing the relationship among Aglaophenia trifida lineages. Numbers at nodes represent the BPP and BS, and are shown only when BPP ± 0.9 and BS ± 75. Newly-produced sequences are highlighted in yellow.	FIGURE 16. 16S rRNA phylogenetic tree showing the relationship among Aglaophenia trifida lineages. Numbers at nodes represent the BPP and BS, and are shown only when BPP ± 0.9 and BS ± 75. Newly-produced sequences are highlighted in yellow.	2021-02-09	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide		Zenodo	biologists	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide			
45376A35324AB05CFF7CFEC52392FC33.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4529217/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529217	FIGURE 1. Historical illustrations of Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881, modified after the original account. A. Whole colony. B. Hydrotheca. C. Whole phylactocarp seen laterally. D. Cross section through the phylactocarp.	FIGURE 1. Historical illustrations of Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881, modified after the original account. A. Whole colony. B. Hydrotheca. C. Whole phylactocarp seen laterally. D. Cross section through the phylactocarp.	2021-02-09	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide		Zenodo	biologists	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide			
45376A353249B05FFF7CFF5122FFF847.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4529219/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529219	FIGURE 2. Four preserved, fertile colonies of Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881 (unbranched morphotype). Scale bar: 1 cm.	FIGURE 2. Four preserved, fertile colonies of Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881 (unbranched morphotype). Scale bar: 1 cm.	2021-02-09	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide		Zenodo	biologists	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide			
45376A353248B05EFF7CFF512660FCE1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4529221/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529221	FIGURE 3. Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881 (unbranched morphotype). A. Portion of monosiphonic part of stem with proximal parts of three consecutive cladia. B. Detail of a cladial apophysis, showing mamelon and one of the axillar nematothecae. C. Two cladial internodes. D. Proximal part of a cladial internode, showing mesial nematotheca. E. Distal part of a cladial internode, showing lateral nematotheca, thickening of the adaxial hydrothecal wall, and the intranodal ridges. F. Ramulus of phylactocarp with a gonotheca. Scale bars: B, D, E = 100 µm; C = 200 µm; A = 400 µm; F = 500 µm.	FIGURE 3. Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881 (unbranched morphotype). A. Portion of monosiphonic part of stem with proximal parts of three consecutive cladia. B. Detail of a cladial apophysis, showing mamelon and one of the axillar nematothecae. C. Two cladial internodes. D. Proximal part of a cladial internode, showing mesial nematotheca. E. Distal part of a cladial internode, showing lateral nematotheca, thickening of the adaxial hydrothecal wall, and the intranodal ridges. F. Ramulus of phylactocarp with a gonotheca. Scale bars: B, D, E = 100 µm; C = 200 µm; A = 400 µm; F = 500 µm.	2021-02-09	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide		Zenodo	biologists	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide			
45376A353277B061FF7CFF51217DFCE1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4529225/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529225	FIGURE 4. SEM study of Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881, unbranched morphotype (part). A. Portion of stem, showing its fascicled condition. B. Portions of cladia. C. Two cladial internodes. D. Whole phylactocarp. E, F. Proximal part of a phylactocarp at different magnifications. All from sample MNHN-IK-2015-617. Scale bars: C = 100 µm; B = 200 µm; A, F = 500 µm; E = 1 mm; D = 2 mm.	FIGURE 4. SEM study of Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881, unbranched morphotype (part). A. Portion of stem, showing its fascicled condition. B. Portions of cladia. C. Two cladial internodes. D. Whole phylactocarp. E, F. Proximal part of a phylactocarp at different magnifications. All from sample MNHN-IK-2015-617. Scale bars: C = 100 µm; B = 200 µm; A, F = 500 µm; E = 1 mm; D = 2 mm.	2021-02-09	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide		Zenodo	biologists	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide			
45376A353276B063FF7CFF5122C3FDA0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4529230/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529230	FIGURE 5. SEM study of Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881, unbranched morphotype (continued). A. Detail of an empty phylactocarp. B. Portion of a phylactocarp bearing gonothecae. C. Gonothecae, greatly enlarged. D. Three insertions of gonothecae on the proximal, adaxial side of a ramulus. E. Detail of adjacent ramuli. F. Distal end of a phylactocarp seen apically. All from sample MNHN-IK-2015-617. Scale bars: D = 50 µm; E = 100 µm; B, C = 200 µm; A, F = 500 µm.	FIGURE 5. SEM study of Callicarpa gracilis Fewkes, 1881, unbranched morphotype (continued). A. Detail of an empty phylactocarp. B. Portion of a phylactocarp bearing gonothecae. C. Gonothecae, greatly enlarged. D. Three insertions of gonothecae on the proximal, adaxial side of a ramulus. E. Detail of adjacent ramuli. F. Distal end of a phylactocarp seen apically. All from sample MNHN-IK-2015-617. Scale bars: D = 50 µm; E = 100 µm; B, C = 200 µm; A, F = 500 µm.	2021-02-09	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide		Zenodo	biologists	Galea, Horia R.;Di Camillo, Cristina G.;Maggioni, Davide			
