identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
081487B0755BFFB6FF73FEE4FAA9FBFA.text	081487B0755BFFB6FF73FEE4FAA9FBFA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lacertopontonia	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Lacertopontonia gen. nov.</p>
            <p> Type species.  Lacertopontonia chadi gen. et sp. nov., by present designation and monotypy. </p>
            <p> Etymology. The genus is named after Lizard Island, GBR, Australia, the type locality; “ lacertus” (Latin, masculine) meaning “a lizard” and its general similarity with the Eastern Pacific pontoniine shrimp genus  Pontonia Latreille, 1829 (the type genus of the subfamily  Pontoniinae ). Gender feminine. </p>
            <p>Diagnosis. Medium-sized pontoniine shrimp with swollen, slightly depressed subcylindrical body; body and appendages smooth, generally glabrous, distal part of propodi and dactyli of ambulatory pereiopods covered with tufts of simple setae. Carapace swollen, without antennal or hepatic teeth, with inferior orbital angle acutely terminating; rostrum well developed, but short and broad, curved downward, dorsally and ventrally unarmed, reaching midlength of basal antennular segment in females and distal part of basal antennular segment in males, with well developed lateral carina, ventral carina forming broad distinct keel between antennular segments. Abdominal somites unarmed, smooth, with non-carinate tergites; three last pleomeres small, with feebly developed rounded pleurae. Telson stout, tapering distally, with three pairs of small, stout dorsal spines, with posterior margin of the telson blunt armed with two pair of spines and a row of long submarginal setae. Eyes large, swollen, stout, smooth; eyestalk swollen, cylindrical; cornea large, rounded, well pigmented. Antennula and antenna without specific features, slightly reduced; basal antennular segment with well marked ventromedial and distolateral teeth; scaphocerite of antenna well developed, with large acute distolateral tooth separated from blade by distinct notch. Mandible well developed, without palp, lateral margin of incisor process smooth. Maxillula with bilobed palp. Maxilla normal, with pointed simple palp and single distally rounded endite furnished with styliform elongated setae along distal and lateral margins; scaphognathite broad, furnished with short plumose setae. Maxilliped I normal, with earshaped epipod bearing distinct lateral notch, with slender exopod with expanded caridean lobe; basal and coxal endites completely fused; epipod well marked, distally rounded. Maxilliped II with normal rounded epipod and slender exopod overreaching propodal segment; propodus with distolateral margin broadly rounded, with dorsal margin convex furnished with slender setae, dactylar segment slender, about 3 times as long as broad. Maxilliped III normal, with well developed epipod and exopod; ischiomeral segment broad furnished with simple setae along its lateral margins. Appendages robust, unarmed, smooth. Pereiopod I normal, with slender segments and simple non-spatulate fingers. Pereiopods II small and robust, equal in size and shape, with unarmed smooth segments, fingers of chela equal, broad and compressed, about 0.6 of palm length. Ambulatory pereiopods (p-p III – IV) similar, robust, smooth, with simple dactyli, with distal part of propodi and dactyli densely covered with simple setae. Uropod stout, with exopod about 0.6 of endopod length; exopod with bluntly-rounded distolateral angle, without movable distolateral spine. Endopod of pleopod II in males with short appendix masculine, about 1.5 times shorter than appendix interna, without specific features, covered with numerous simple setose setae.</p>
            <p> Remarks. The new genus can be clearly distinguished from all known pontoniine genera by the combination of the following morphological characters: smooth glabrous body, the absence of antennal and hepatic teeth, broad toothless rostrum turned downward, telson with three pairs of dorsal submarginal spines and two pairs of posterior spines, simple non-spatulate fingers of pereiopod I, short and robust equal pereiopods II with equal fingers, simple dactyli of ambulatory pereiopods, short uropodal exopod (about 1.5 times shorter than uropodal endopod), and the absence of movable spine at the distolateral angle of uropodal exopod. The most distinctive feature of the new genus is the presence of three pairs of dorsal submarginal spines on the telson which is a unique feature within the subfamily  Pontoniinae . Among other  Pontonia -like genera (see Fransen, 2002) and species similar characters have been found only in ascidian-associated  Odontonia sibogae (Bruce, 1972) having up to five pairs of dorsal spines on the telson. The latter species is easily distinguished from the new genus by the biunguiculate dactyli of ambulatory pereiopods.  Conchodytes nipponensis (De Haan, 1844) , and  Conchodytes -related  Chernocaris placunae Johnson, 1967 possess the lateral pair of terminal telson spines also rather distant from the distal margin (see Johnson, 1967; Fransen, 1994) but both species clearly differ by biunguiculate dactylus of ambulatory pereiopods. </p>
            <p> The second distinguishing feature of the new genus within the  Pontonia -like bivalve-associated pontoniine genera is simple dactylus of ambulatory pereiopod III. Such a feature is characteristic only for a few bivalve-associated  Pontonia -like shrimps such as  Pseudopontonia minuta (Baker, 1972) , species of the genus  Platypontonia Bruce, 1968 ,  Pontonia pilosa Fransen, 2002 ,  Pontonia simplex Holthuis, 1951 ,  Odontonia seychellensis Fransen, 2002 and  Odontonia simplicipes (Bruce, 1996) . </p>
            <p> Pontonia pilosa and P. s i m p l e x can be clearly separated by the presence of well marked antennal tooth on carapace, longer slender compressed rostrum overreaching basal antennular segment, the presence of two pairs of dorsal spines on telson as well as the geographical distribution – exclusively in the Atlantic basin (Fransen, 2002).  Pseudopontonia minuta can be clearly separated by deeper rostrum, the presence of two pairs of dorsal and numerous distal spines on telson, and different mouthparts (see Bruce, 1972). </p>
            <p> Platypontonia is similar to the new genus in the form of dactyli of ambulatory pereiopods and short uropodal exopod but can be clearly separated by the presence of well marked antennal tooth on carapace, shorter rostrum turned forward, the presence of additional medial lobe at distolateral angle of basal antennular segment (vs. pointed broad triangular angle in  Lacertopontonia ), the absence of a notch between distolateral tooth and blade of scaphocerite (the feature also characteristic for the genus  Pontonia ), the presence of two pairs of small dorsal spines on telson, more slender chela of pereiopods II having longer fingers equal to the length of palm and the presence of a minute movable spine at the distolateral angle of uropodal exopod (Bruce, 1968; Hipeau-Jacquotte, 1971). </p>
            <p> Odontonia seychellensis and  O. simplicipes clearly differ from  Lacertopontonia by the presence of two pairs of dorsal spines on the telson and ecologically, inhabiting tunicates (  Ascidiidae , Ascidiacea) (see Fransen, 2002). </p>
            <p> In general the new genus is particularly morphologically similar to  Bruceonia ardeae (Bruce, 1981) representing a monotypic genus  Bruceonia Fransen, 2002 known only from the Great Barrier Reef of Australia (Bruce, 1981; Fransen, 2002). Nevertheless, the new genus can be clearly distinguished from the latter by smooth body (vs. densely setose body in  Bruceonia ), the presence of three pairs of relatively large robust submarginal dorsal spines on telson (vs. two small submarginal spines in  Bruceonia ), different shape of maxillula and maxilla and simple dactyli of ambulatory pereiopods (  Bruceonia has biunguiculate dactyli with small but distinct accessory tooth) (see Bruce, 1981; Fransen, 2002). Some features such as shape of maxillula and other mouthparts as well as the presence of a distinct notch between distolateral tooth and blade of scaphocerite show probable relationships between the new genus and species of the genus  Pontonia occurring in the Eastern Pacific region and Atlantic ocean. </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/081487B0755BFFB6FF73FEE4FAA9FBFA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Marin, Ivan	Marin, Ivan (2011): Lacertopontonia chadi gen. et sp. nov., a new oyster-associated Pontonia - like pontoniine shrimp (Crustacea, Decapoda, Palaemonidae) from the Great Barrier Reef of Australia. Zootaxa 2968: 57-68, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.204662
081487B07558FFBEFF73FB48FB43F812.text	081487B07558FFBEFF73FB48FB43F812.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lacertopontonia chadi	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Lacertopontonia chadi sp. nov.</p>
            <p>(Figs. 1 –7)</p>
            <p> Material examined. Holotype, ovigerous female (QM W33473) – Australia, GBR, Lizard Island, lagoon, Channel, st. LI10-022, 14° 41.435 S 145° 27.912 E, 14–15 meters depth, in wash-out from bivalve  Lopha cristagalli growing on sea whip, coll. Chad Buxton, 28 Aug. 2010. Paratypes, 1 ovigerous females and 1 male (RMNH) – same data and host as for holotype. </p>
            <p>Description. Female. Medium-sized pontoniine shrimp with smooth swollen body (Fig. 1). Carapace smooth, swollen, subcylindrical, without antennal and hepatic teeth, with inferior orbital angle acutely produced, turned downward (Fig. 2 b). Rostrum (Fig. 2 a–e) robust, deep, unarmed, distally rounded and turned downward, reaching midlenght of basal antennular segment, with ventral carina well developed, forming distinct keel (Fig. 2 c, e).</p>
            <p>Abdominal somites smooth, unarmed; tergites non-carinate, not posteriorly produced; pleurae of first to third abdominal pleomeres posteroventrally rounded; three last abdominal pleomeres small bearing feebly developed pleurae (Fig. 1); ventral margin of the sixth pleomere bluntly rounded. Telson (Figs. 2 f, 3 d, e) stout, dorsally smooth, about twice as long as proximal width, tapering distally, with three pairs of relatively large submarginal dorsal spines, each about 0.12 of telson length, inserted at about 0.15, 0.5 and 0.85 of the telson length, respectively (Figs. 2 f, 3 d, e); posterior margin bluntly rounded, armed with two pair of posterior spines, lateral posterior spines about half length of medial ones.</p>
            <p>Eyes (Fig. 2 a–e) large, swollen and smooth; cornea rounded, well developed and well pigmented; eyestalk stout, swollen, cylindrical, about as long as wide.</p>
            <p>Antennula and antennae slightly reduced (Fig. 2 a–e). Antennula (Fig. 3 a) stout, basal peduncular segment robust, about as long as its proximal width, with straight lateral margins, with well developed ventromedial tooth (Fig. 3 b) and broad sharp triangular distolateral tooth (Fig. 3 a), stylocerite stout, bluntly rounded distally, reaching the midlenght of basal segment; second antennular segment stout, about 1.5 times longer than wide; the third (distal) segment stout, unarmed, about as long as wide; lateral flagellum thick, main ramus with five separate segments, accessory ramus with two segment; medial flagellum filiform, with 8–9 segments. Antenna (Fig. 3 c) with stout basicerite, about 1.5 times wider than long, with distolateral margin unarmed; carpocerite robust, slightly overreaching scaphocerite, about five times longer than wide; scaphocerite with well developed blade, with large acute distolateral tooth separated from the blade with a deep notch (Fig. 3 c).</p>
            <p>Epistome with blunt median carina; labrum suboval (Fig. 4 a). Mandible (Fig. 4 b) well developed, without palp; molar process well-developed, stout; incisor process slender, tapering distally, with five triangular distal teeth. Maxillula (Fig. 4 c) with well-developed stout bilobed palp, dorsal lobe blunt, ventral lobe with small curved spine; dorsal lacinia broad, expanded distally, distal margin bluntly rounded, covered with row of small stout spines and numerous simple setae; ventral lacinia slender, reaching distal margin of dorsal lacinia, with long simple setae distoventrally and marginally. Maxilla (Fig. 4 d) normal, with simple palp tapering distally; with single simple distally bluntly rounded endite furnished with styliform elongated setae along its lateral margin; coxal endite feebly developed; scaphognathite broad, furnished with short plumose setae. Maxilliped I (Fig. 4 e) normal; epipod earshaped, with distinct medial notch; exopod slender, with expanded caridean lobe; basal and coxal endites completely fused, furnished with numerous long simple setae distally; palp slender, rounded distally. Maxilliped II (Fig.</p>
            <p> FIGURE 2.  Lacertopontonia chadi gen. et sp. nov., ovigerous paratype female (a–c, f) and paratype male (d, e) (RMNH): a, b, d —front of carapace, lateral view; c, e —front of carapace, dorsal view; f —telson. </p>
            <p> FIGURE 3.  Lacertopontonia chadi gen. et sp. nov., ovigerous holotype female (d) (QM W33473) and ovigerous paratype female (a–c, e, f) (RMNH): a —antennula, dorsal view; b —antennula, lateral view; c —antenna; d —telson and uropods; e —telson; f —distolateral margin of uropodal exopod. </p>
            <p> FIGURE 4.  Lacertopontonia chadi gen. et sp. nov., ovigerous paratype female (RMNH): a —labrum; b —mandible; c —maxillula; d —maxilla; e —maxilliped I; f —maxilliped II; g —maxilliped III. </p>
            <p> FIGURE 5.  Lacertopontonia chadi gen. et sp. nov., ovigerous paratype female (RMNH): a —pereiopod I; b —chela of pereiopod I; c —pereiopod II; d, e —chela of pereiopod II; f —pereiopod III; g —dactylus of pereiopod III. </p>
            <p> FIGURE 6.  Lacertopontonia chadi gen. et sp. nov., ovigerous paratype female (b), paratype male (a, c–f) (RMNH X): a —general dorsal view of paratype male; b, c, d —fingers of major pereiopod II; e, f —fingers of minor pereiopod II. </p>
            <p> FIGURE 7. Coloration of  Lacertopontonia chadi gen. et sp. nov., holotype, ovigerous female (b, c) (QM W33473), ovigerous paratype female (a) and paratype male (d) (RMNH). Male was photographed shortly after death. </p>
            <p>4 f) with robust segments; epipod normal, rounded; exopod slender reaching the propodal segment, with numerous long simple setae distally; distolateral margin of propodus broadly rounded, dorsal margin convex, furnished with slender setae; dactylus about three times as long as broad, with numerous medium stout spines and numerous simple setae along distal margin. Maxilliped III (Fig. 4 g) stout; with quadrate epipod, without arthrobranch; exopod slender, slightly overreaching antepenultimate segment, with numerous long simple setae distally; antepenultimate segment stout, broadened, about twice longer than wide; penultimate segment about 2.5 times as long as wide, with straight margins; ultimate segment slender, slightly shorter than penultimate segment, about twice longer than wide, tapering distally, with tufts of long setae along ventrolateral margin, with several long setae distally.</p>
            <p>Pereiopod I (Fig. 5 a) relatively slender, with smooth, unarmed segments; coxa with well marked rounded distoventral lobe; basis about as long as wide; ischium about twice times as long as wide; merus slender, about five times as long as wide, with straight ventral and dorsal margins; carpus long and slender, widening distally, about six times as long as maximal width, slightly longer than merus, about twice as long as chela; palm (Fig. 5 b) about twice as long as wide, subcylindrical in cross-section; fingers slender, subcylindrical, about four times as long as proximal width, equal to palm, with simple tips and straight cutting edges.</p>
            <p>Pereiopods II with smooth unarmed segments, equal in size, similar in shape in females (Figs. 1, 5 c, 7) and slightly unequal in size in males (Fig. 7); basis rectangular, as long as wide; ischium widening distally, about 1.7 times as long as maximum width; merus relatively stout, about twice longer than maximum width, with straight ventral and dorsal margins; carpus stout, swollen, slightly widening distally, about 1.5 times as long as maximum width; palm (Fig. 5 c–e) subcylindrical in cross-section, slightly widening proximally, about twice longer than proximal width; fingers robust, about 1.5 times shorter than palm, about three times as long as wide, fixed finger (pollex) with two triangular acute teeth in proximomedial part, movable finger with small triangular tooth on medial part in females (Figs. 5 d, e, 6 b) and with large semicircular tooth on medial part in males (Fig. 6 c–f), with acute curved simple tips.</p>
            <p>Pereiopods III – V similar in size and shape. Pereiopod III (Fig. 5 f) with stout smooth segments; coxa and basis about as long as wide; ischium about 2.5 times as long as wide; merus about three times as long as wide, with straight ventral and dorsal margins; carpus stout, widening distally, about half of the length of merus and propodus, about 3.5 times as long as wide, with bluntly projecting distodorsal margin slightly overlapping carpo-propodal articulation; propodus relatively robust, about 4.5 times as long as wide, with straight lateral margins, ventrally unarmed, without distoventral teeth, distal part of propodus covered with numerous short simple setae; dactylus (Fig. 5 g) simple, robust, about 2.5 times as long as wide, covered with small short simple setae, unguis short robust and curved.</p>
            <p>Pleopods smooth, normal, without specific features. Uropods stout, smooth, not exceeding telson, exopod about 0.6 of endopod length (Fig. 3 d); lateral margin of uropodal exopod straight, with bluntly rounded distolateral angle, without movable distolateral spine or fixed distolateral tooth (Fig. 3 f); with simple diaeresis.</p>
            <p>Male. Generally similar to female but smaller in size. Pereiopods II large and slightly dissimilar, with well developed teeth on fingers (Fig. 6), larger than in females (Fig. 7 a, d). Endopod of pleopod II in males with short appendix masculine, about 1.5 times shorter than appendix interna, without specific features, covered with numerous setose setae.</p>
            <p>Coloration. Generally semi-translucent; body and appendages creamy-whitish covered with tiny white dots; cornea of eyes bright silver; gonads and eggs orange-red (Fig. 7).</p>
            <p>Measurements. Relatively large pontoniine shrimp species. Holotype, ovigerous female – pcl. 6.0 mm, tl. 20 mm; paratypes, ovigerous female – pcl. 5.0 mm, tl. 19 mm and male – pcl. 4.0 mm, tl. 12 mm.</p>
            <p>Etymology. The species is named after Chad Buxton (Museum of tropical Queensland, Townsville, Australia), the collector of the type specimens of this interesting shrimp.</p>
            <p> Host. All examined specimens of  Lacertopontonia chadi sp. nov. were collected from washout of a cluster of cockscomb oyster  Lopha cristagalli (Linnaeus, 1758) (Bivalvia,  Ostreidae ) growing on sea whip  Cirripathes sp (Anthipatharia, Anthipathidae). The cluster consisted of seven large and several small shells connected by their bases to the sea whip. Several mature specimens of pontoniine shrimp  Anchistus sp. (Crustacea,  Decapoda ,  Palaemonidae ), probably belonging to an undescribed species, were also found in the same washout. </p>
            <p>Distribution. Presently only known from the type locality, Lizard Island, GBR, Australia.</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/081487B07558FFBEFF73FB48FB43F812	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Marin, Ivan	Marin, Ivan (2011): Lacertopontonia chadi gen. et sp. nov., a new oyster-associated Pontonia - like pontoniine shrimp (Crustacea, Decapoda, Palaemonidae) from the Great Barrier Reef of Australia. Zootaxa 2968: 57-68, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.204662
