identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
084687C2FFDDFFB4FF13F3FBFA51FBC3.text	084687C2FFDDFFB4FF13F3FBFA51FBC3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Aneuropria Kieffer 1905	<div><p>Genus Aneuropria Kieffer, 1905</p><p>Aneuropria Kieffer, 1905: 35 .</p><p>Pezopria Kieffer, 1910: 697 . Synonymized by Masner &amp; Sundholm (1959).</p><p>Mantara Dodd, 1920: 379 . Synonymized by Notton (2014).</p><p>Valia Alekseev, 1979: 617 . Syn. nov.</p><p>Type species Aneuropria clavata Kieffer, 1911 (= Polypeza foersteri Kieffer, 1910), first included species.</p><p>Genus diagnosis. Small to medium-sized (1–3 mm) individuals; body color predominantly deep black with appendages lighter, predominantly smooth, highly shining, with relatively little pilosity (but with dense silvery pilosity on petiole and propodeum, with some hairy cushions, but without foamy structures); labrum subtriangular, exposed, sclerotized; oral carina strongly developed permitting movement of mandible only along vertical axis; mandible long, almost flat, bidentate, distinctly projecting backward (opisthognathous), its upper condyles much closer to each other than the lower ones and axes connected the upper and lower condyles of each mandibles not parallel (Figs 2D, 6B, 8A); A1 unarmed, without apical flaps; A 4 in male not modified; median keel of propodeum simple (Fig. 1A) to reduced; plica strongly developed, projecting posteriorly, almost bladelike; posterior margin of propodeum between plicae deeply excavate; anterior margin of T2 not notched medially or laterally and bare; anterior margin of S2 with grooves like depression laterally and median depression with short notch at the bottom (Figs 2G, 7B, D); belytoid line absent.</p><p>Remarks. In 2014, Notton proposed to consider the monotypic genus Mantara as a junior synonym of the genus Aneuropria . Unfortunately, he did not provide any evidence to support this suggestion. Nevertheless, M. dentata is indeed extremely similar to the species of the genus Aneuropria and differs from the latter mainly in its more pronounced reductions (complete fusion of the mesonotum and scutellum with each other, reduction of tegulae and all structures on the mesonotum and scutellum). However, if we accept Notton's proposal, then the monotypic genus Valia, with the single species V. dentata, should also be considered a junior synonym of Aneuropria, since it also differs from the genus Aneuropria only in the reduction of some features and is extremely similar to the species Mantara bifurcata .</p><p>The diagnosis of Aneuropria suggested above is a modified and supplemented version of that given by Masner &amp; García (2002). All the additions made are mainly related to the proposed generic synonymy and, consequently, a broader interpretation of the genus. All species currently considered to be part of the genus Aneuropria, as well as Valia dentata correspond to the proposed diagnosis, with the exception of the species Aneuropria nilgiriensis Sharma, 1979 (Fig. 1). Many features mentioned in the original description (frons between eyes with sharp projections, apical rim of A1 with sharp flaps and aditional sharp projection medially, median propodeal carina replaced by inverted V-shaped carina, T2 with deep and long median cleft (Fig. 1B)) and confirmed by studying the type material do not agreed with the Aneuropria characters but correspond with diagnosis of Coptera Say, which was given by Masner &amp; García (2002). Thereby the new combination Coptera nilgiriensis (Sharma, 1979) comb. nov. is proposed here.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/084687C2FFDDFFB4FF13F3FBFA51FBC3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Chemyreva, Vasilisa G.;Kolyada, Victor A.;Ku, Deok-Seo	Chemyreva, Vasilisa G., Kolyada, Victor A., Ku, Deok-Seo (2025): Review of the Palaearctic species of the genera Aneuropria Kieffer, 1905 and Labolips Förster, 1856 (Hymenoptera, Diapriidae) with description of a new species from South Korea and Japan. Zootaxa 5715 (1): 119-136, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.9
084687C2FFDFFFB5FF13F5CEFA5AFE0C.text	084687C2FFDFFFB5FF13F5CEFA5AFE0C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Aneuropria Kieffer 1905	<div><p>Key to the Palaearctic Aneuropria Kieffer species</p><p>1. Notauli absent; median carina of propodeum totally absent (Figs 2F, 3C, 5B, 6C); tegula strongly reduced and tiny (Figs 5B, F, 6A, E) ............................................................................................. 2</p><p>- Notauli present, deep and complete; median carina of propodeum present (as in Fig. 12A, B, E) at least at base of it (Fig. 8C); tegula large even in most brachypterous forms (Fig. 8D)..................................... A. foersteri (Kieffer)</p><p>2. Transscutal suture weakly defined, shallow anterior scutellar pits present (Figs 2F, 3C); small ocelli present; all antennomeres of female antennae elongate in dorsal view (Fig. 2A); S2 with a bunch of white setae medially at distal margin (Fig. 2G); mesopleuron with few weight setae under tegula (Fig. 2E).................................... A. bifurcata (Dodd)</p><p>- Transscutal suture and anterior scutellar pits totally absent (Figs 5B, 6A); ocelli absent; A4−A11 sunquadrate in dorsal view (Fig. 5E); S2 without a bunch of setae at distal margin (Fig. 7B); mesopleuron with dense weight setose under tegula (Fig. 5F)............................................................................... A. dentata (Alekseev)</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/084687C2FFDFFFB5FF13F5CEFA5AFE0C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Chemyreva, Vasilisa G.;Kolyada, Victor A.;Ku, Deok-Seo	Chemyreva, Vasilisa G., Kolyada, Victor A., Ku, Deok-Seo (2025): Review of the Palaearctic species of the genera Aneuropria Kieffer, 1905 and Labolips Förster, 1856 (Hymenoptera, Diapriidae) with description of a new species from South Korea and Japan. Zootaxa 5715 (1): 119-136, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.9
084687C2FFDFFFBFFF13F715FC32FEB7.text	084687C2FFDFFFBFFF13F715FC32FEB7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Aneuropria bifurcata (Dodd 1920)	<div><p>Aneuropria bifurcata (Dodd, 1920)</p><p>(Figs 2, 3)</p><p>Mantara bifurcata Dodd, 1920: 380 .</p><p>Aneuropria bifurcata: Notton 2014: 38.</p><p>Material examined. Paratypes: Mantara bifurcata Dodd, 1920, 1♀ and 1♂, “ Madeira./ Wolfaston./ 55.7” (NHML). The other labels are shown in Fig. 2B .</p><p>Diagnosis. Wingless specimens; all antennomeres of female antennae elongate in dorsal view (Fig. 2A); female A12 (?)without ventral pit; male antennae gradually widened apically, with A10 as wide as long in dorsal view, while all other antennomeres elongate (Fig. 3D); antennomeres with almost equal width in dorsal and lateral view; small ocelli present (Fig. 2F); notauli absent; transscutal suture weak but present (Figs 2F, 3C); scutellar disc with two shallow depression anteriorly separated with wide distance (Fig. 2F); mesopleuron with scanty weight pubescence under tegula (Fig. 2E); median carina of propodeum totally absent; S2 with a bunch of weight setae medially at distal margin (Fig. 2G).</p><p>Distribution. Portugal (Madeira).</p><p>Aneuropria dentata (Alekseev, 1979), comb. nov.</p><p>(Figs 4−6, 7A, B)</p><p>Valia dentata Alekseev, 1979: 617 .</p><p>Material examined. Holotype, female: “Crimea/ Nikita park near/ Yalta/ on Quercus sp./ 1.10.1964 / K. Arnoldi ” (Fig. 4B) . Non-type material. Russia: 1♀, Crimea, Bakhchisaray Distr., Kayas-Dzhilga 1 km S of Sel’bukhra town, 2.VIII.1995, M. Mostovski leg.; 1♂, Crimea, vicinity of Alushta, 11.VIII.2011, A. Reshchikov leg.; * Abkhazia: 1♂, Bzipi River, 43.2190˚N, 40.2937˚E, YPT , 9−11.VIII.2015, V . Chemyreva leg. (all in ZISP) .</p><p>Diagnosis. Wingless specimens; female A4−A11 subquadrate in dorsal view (Fig. 5E); female A12 with ventral pit medially; male antennae gradually and slightly widened apically, A7−A13 subquadrate, antennomeres with almost equal width in dorsal and lateral view (Fig. 7A); ocelli absent; occipital flange foveolate; notauli absent; transscutal suture and anterior scutellar pits absent (Figs 4D, 5B); mesopleuron with dense weight setose under tegula (Fig. 5F); median carina of propodeum totally absent; S2 without a bunch of setae at distal margin (Fig. 7B).</p><p>Description. Male (hitherto unknown). Body length 2.4 mm; antenna length 1.8 mm. Body black, mandible and antennae dark brown, legs reddish brown, palpi yellow.</p><p>Head smooth only with rare and sparse not deep setigeroup punctures; pubescence upstanding, long and scattered, postgenal cushion dense, frons laterally from antennal shelf finely and shortly setose; head in dorsal view elongate 1.2 times as long as wide, and 1.5 times as wide as mesosoma; in lateral view about as high as long. Clypeus transverse and slightly convex but epistomal sulcus indistinct. Tentorial pit present, distance between them distinctly shorter than pleurostomal distance. Labrum semicircular, setose and covered with deep setigeroup punctures. Head width 1.65 times of pleurostomal distance, last one as long as distance between eyes. Mandibles slightly overlapping, bidentate, with lower tooth slightly wider. Height of head 2.5х of eye height and malar space as long as height of eye. Eyes with few long setae. Ocelli totally absent.</p><p>Antenna.A1 distinctly cylindrical, curved, covered with coriaceous sculpture and scattered long setae; its apical rim simple; A2 conical (attenuate at base) in lateral view and subquadrate in dorsal views; A4 not modified and shorter than A3; A12 longest flagellomere and slightly longer than A3, with ventral pit medially. In lateral view, ratios of length to width of antennomeres as in Fig. 7A; length and width of flagellomeres same in dorsal and lateral views.</p><p>Mesosoma. Neck bare and perfectly smooth. Cervical pronotal area short and almost vertical, densely pubescent (pubescence heterogeneous in length); pronotal shoulders not projecting, smooth and pubescent; lateral sides of pronotum mainly smooth and bare with only fine transverse striation ventrally and dense lateral pronotal cushion anteriorly. Propleuron at least partly with fine elongate striation, densely pubescent in posterior half and almost bare anteriorly. Mesoscutum fused with scutellum, flat and mainly smooth, with only scattered setigerous puncture and setae on the periphery; axillar depression and all kind of scutellar pits absent. Upper part of mesopleuron with densely pubescent and quite large subalar impression, which separated from smooth and bare median part of mesopleuron with distinct carina; epicnemial pit distinct, moderately large and pubescent inside; sternaulus present as distinct carina with a row of stout setae along it; mesopleuron ventrally with ventral longitudinal carina of mesopleuron, that extending from anterior to median coxae (Fig. 6E), area between it and sternaulus smooth bare and slightly depressed; ventral area of mesopleuron between right and left ventral longitudinal carinae of mesopleuron densely pubescent, with only mesodiscrimen visible as deeply foveolate suture. Metanotum strongly reduce, visible as small semicircular sclerites laterally. Propodeum rugulose and punctulate, mainly pubescent except plicae; dorsal surface of propodeum between plicae not separated from nucha posteriorly and distinctly shorter than lateral side of propodeum; plical process and metapleural carinae process expands beyond anterior margin of petiole; metapleuron and lateral side of propodeum densely pubescent. All legs slender, without trochantellus, without peculiarities in pubescence. Fore wing totally absent, tegulae strongly reduced.</p><p>Metasoma. Petiole cylindrical, entirely rugose and densely pubescent (Fig. 6C); T2 smooth, covered with scattered, stout and long semi-erect setae; T3‒T6 very short, totally smooth and bare (Fig. 6D); T7 as long as T4‒T6 measured together, micropunctured, with only several strong setae and setigerous punctures; T8 about as long as T7, micropunctured, with several strong setae and setigerous punctures, without trace of cerci. Base of S2 with grooves like depression laterally which moderately short and wide and densely pubescent inside; median depression with short notch at the bottom, scarcely pubescent; posterior surface of S2 smooth, with few sparse setae and setigerous punctures; S3‒S7 with transverse line of micropunctuation and very few setigerous punctures with strong setae; S8 semicircular smooth and shining, with only several setigerous punctures and long setae (Fig. 7B).</p><p>Distribution. The Black Sea region (Crimea and the western Caucasus).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/084687C2FFDFFFBFFF13F715FC32FEB7	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Chemyreva, Vasilisa G.;Kolyada, Victor A.;Ku, Deok-Seo	Chemyreva, Vasilisa G., Kolyada, Victor A., Ku, Deok-Seo (2025): Review of the Palaearctic species of the genera Aneuropria Kieffer, 1905 and Labolips Förster, 1856 (Hymenoptera, Diapriidae) with description of a new species from South Korea and Japan. Zootaxa 5715 (1): 119-136, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.9
084687C2FFD5FFBFFF13F4D6FD40F8D9.text	084687C2FFD5FFBFFF13F4D6FD40F8D9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Aneuropria foersteri (Kieffer 1910)	<div><p>Aneuropria foersteri (Kieffer, 1910)</p><p>(Figs 7 C−E, 8)</p><p>Polypeza foersteri Kieffer, 1910: 718 .</p><p>Polypeza gastroi Kieffer, 1910: 719 (Fig. 11C, D).</p><p>Pezopria fuscicornis Kieffer, 1911: 886 . Synonymized by Masner &amp; Sundholm (1959).</p><p>Aneuropria clavata Kieffer, 1911: 898 . Synonymized by Masner &amp; Sundholm (1959).</p><p>Glyptonota subpilosa Kieffer, 1911: 900 . Synonymized by Masner &amp; Sundholm (1959).</p><p>Material examined. Holotype Polypeza gastroi Kieffer, 1910 (Fig. 12C, D) (MCSN) . Non-type material. Ukraine: 1♂, Kharkiv Province, Krasnokutsk, dendropark, 11.IX.1992, N. Storozheva (ZISP). Russia: 1♂, Crimea, Kara-Dag N.P ., 4–8. VI .1990, D. Kasparyan; 1♂, Krasnodar Territory, Sochy, Lazarevskoe Vill ., 17–20.IX.1981, V . Tobias; 1♂, Adygeya, Dakhovskaya env., <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=40.17&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=44.199" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 40.17/lat 44.199)">Belaya River valley</a>, 44.199°N 40.170°E, 465m , 18–31.VIII.2009, K. Tomkovich; 1♀, Chechnya, Grozny city , 25. VI .1968, presumed from puparium Cloropidae, probably of Thaumatomyia glabra Mg.; 1♂, Orenburg Province, Sol’-Iletsk District, Bukabay River, 7–10.IX.1996, M. Mostovski (all in ZISP). * Kazakhstan: 1♀, near Almaty city, 19. VI .1985, M. Kozlov (ZISP). * Turkmenistan: 1♀, Kara-Kala, El-Dere canyon, 4–7. V .1981, G. Dlusskiy (ZISP). * Israel: 1♀, Nort Galilee, 23. V.1966, V. Tryapitsyn &amp; Gusev (ZISP). * South Korea: 3♀ Jeju-si, Bonggae-dong, San 78-1, Jeolmul Natural Reservation Forest, 15–31. V.2023, MT Deokseo Ku, Muncheon Kwon legs. (NIBR, SMNE); ♀ Gangwon-do, Mt Jeombong, Jindong-ri, Girin-meon, Inge-gun, 38°2ʹ58ʹʹN 128°28ʹ52ʹʹE , 13. V –22. VI.2017, MT, Hyung-Geun Lee leg. (ZISP).</p><p>Diagnosis. Wingless to alate specimens; all flagellomeres of female elongate in dorsal view exept A8−A11 or A9−A11 sunquadrate and A9−A11 sometimes slightly transverse (Fig. 7F, G); female A12 with ventral pit medially; male antennae gradually and very slightly widened apically, all antennomeres elongate in dorsal view; ocelli absent or only tiny frontal one present (Fig. 8B); occipital flange foveolate to almost smooth; notauli present, complete and deep; transscutal suture and anterior scutellar pits distinct (Fig. 8C); mesopleuron bare under tegula (Fig. 8D); median carina of propodeum distinct at least at base of it (Fig. 8C); S2 without a bunch of setae at distal margin (Fig. 7D).</p><p>Variation. This species is highly variable since the presence of almost wingless, winged and intermediate forms. Here are only some aspects of its variation described: wings reaching to anterior margin of propodeum to slightly longer than meso- and metasoma measured together; male flagellomeres more or less elongate in dorsal view; occipital flange fovelae to almost smooth; head in dorsal view transverse to as long as wide, with temple receding to convex; head in frontal view from almost perfectly rounded to subtriangular but always about as high as wide; mesosoma almost as wide as head to strongly narrower; neck totally smooth or with fine and shallow foveolae posteriorly; notauli different in wide and deepness; anterior scutellar pits different in shape (from circular to oval) and separated with different distance from each other; lateral and posterior pits of scutellum different in size; median propodeal carina distinct throughout to shortly visible anteriorly; petiole as long as wide to distinctly elongate, partly bare dorsally to completely densely pubescent; T2 perfectly smooth to entirely granulate.</p><p>Biology. The recorded hosts are the Tephritidae Rhagoletis ceraci (L.) (Masner &amp; Sundholm 1959) and the Chloropidae Thaumatomyia glabra (Meigen, 1830) (current data).</p><p>Distribution. Europe(Masner&amp;Sundholm 1959), * Israel, Russia (European part),* Kazakhstan, * Turkmenistan, Iran (Izadizadeh et al. 2020), * South Korea.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/084687C2FFD5FFBFFF13F4D6FD40F8D9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Chemyreva, Vasilisa G.;Kolyada, Victor A.;Ku, Deok-Seo	Chemyreva, Vasilisa G., Kolyada, Victor A., Ku, Deok-Seo (2025): Review of the Palaearctic species of the genera Aneuropria Kieffer, 1905 and Labolips Förster, 1856 (Hymenoptera, Diapriidae) with description of a new species from South Korea and Japan. Zootaxa 5715 (1): 119-136, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.9
084687C2FFD7FFBDFF13F5CEFDD2FD62.text	084687C2FFD7FFBDFF13F5CEFDD2FD62.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Labolips Forster 1856	<div><p>Genus Labolips Förster, 1856</p><p>Type species Labolips innupta Haliday, 1857, by monotypy.</p><p>Genus diagnosis. Body depressed; lateral pronotal cushion and epomia absent (Figs 9A, B, 10C); anterior scutellar pit replaced by arc of minute crenulae (Fig. 9C, F); mesopleuron with distinct sternaulus, mesepimeral sulcus and large epicnemial pit shortly pubescent inside (Fig. 10C); posterior margin of scutellum without trace of foveae; dorsal surface of the propodeum without median carina, bare, coarsely rugose to smooth, it separate from mesopleuron with densely setose depression (Fig. 11D, E); T2 deeply and widely hollowed out at base; lateral corners of T2 large, rounded and exposed anteriorly, sculptured (Fig. 11D); base of S2 arched, with deep lateral depression and coarsely sculptured median protrusion; betyloid line distinct in anterior half of S2 (Fig. 10B, D); antenna stout, thickened towards apex but without differentiated club; A4–A11 submoniliform and transverse; all legs robust, each without delimited trochantellus; fore wing with subcostal vein present only at base (Fig. 11C); ovipositor sheath short, stout and wide, truncate at apex and with crown of stout setae (Figs 10B, D and 11A, B). Males are still unknown.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/084687C2FFD7FFBDFF13F5CEFDD2FD62	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Chemyreva, Vasilisa G.;Kolyada, Victor A.;Ku, Deok-Seo	Chemyreva, Vasilisa G., Kolyada, Victor A., Ku, Deok-Seo (2025): Review of the Palaearctic species of the genera Aneuropria Kieffer, 1905 and Labolips Förster, 1856 (Hymenoptera, Diapriidae) with description of a new species from South Korea and Japan. Zootaxa 5715 (1): 119-136, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.9
084687C2FFD7FFBDFF13F781FCE9FAC8.text	084687C2FFD7FFBDFF13F781FCE9FAC8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Labolips innupta Haliday 1857	<div><p>Labolips innupta Haliday, 1857</p><p>(Figs 9A, C, D; 11A, C)</p><p>Labolips innupta Haliday, 1857: 173, 174, 293, pl. 10. Original description.</p><p>Labolips innupta: Notton &amp; O’Connor 2004: 216, 217. Type information.</p><p>Material examined. Russia: 1♀, Kaliningrad Province, Svetlogorsk town, 1–12.VIII.1999, V. Kolyada leg. ; 1♀, Kurshskaya Kosa N. R. 55°09ʹ16ʹʹN 20°51ʹ27ʹʹE, Rybachiy, Ornitology station of ZIN RAN, 25.VII–10.VIII.1999, V. Kolyada leg. ; 1♀, vicinity of S. Petersburg, Beloostrov station ., 16.VIII.1975, V. Kostjukov leg. ; 18♀, Moscow Province, vicinity of Stupino town, 3.VIII–1.X.1997, V. Kolyada leg. ; 1♀, Moscow City, 12 km SE from metro station “Yugo-Zapadnaya”, 23.VII.1975, V. Kostjukov leg. ; 3♀, Tyumen’ Province, Khanty-Mansi A.O., Mukhrino, 60°53ʹ20ʹʹN 68°42ʹ10ʹʹE, 7–13.VIII.2010, K. Tomkovich leg. All in ZISP.</p><p>Diagnosis. Head slightly to distinctly transverse in dorsal view, more sharply tapers towards occipital carina with genae slightly to distinctly swollen in dorsal and frontal views (Fig. 9A, D); metanotum punctured along posterior margin (Fig. 9C); propodeum coarsely sculptured dorsally.</p><p>Distribution. Ireland (Haliday 1857), England (Nixon 1980), the Netherlands (Peeters 2016), Sweden (Jansson 1945), Germany (Ulrich 1999), Check Republic (Masner 1957), Finland (Hellén 1963), Romania (Fabritius &amp; Weiss 1985), * Russia (European part and Western Siberia).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/084687C2FFD7FFBDFF13F781FCE9FAC8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Chemyreva, Vasilisa G.;Kolyada, Victor A.;Ku, Deok-Seo	Chemyreva, Vasilisa G., Kolyada, Victor A., Ku, Deok-Seo (2025): Review of the Palaearctic species of the genera Aneuropria Kieffer, 1905 and Labolips Förster, 1856 (Hymenoptera, Diapriidae) with description of a new species from South Korea and Japan. Zootaxa 5715 (1): 119-136, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.9
084687C2FFD7FFB8FF13F0DAFD7CFA13.text	084687C2FFD7FFB8FF13F0DAFD7CFA13.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Labolips storozhenkoi Chemyreva, Kolyada & Ku 2025	<div><p>Labolips storozhenkoi Chemyreva, Kolyada &amp; Ku, sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs 9B, E, F; 10; 11B, D, E)</p><p>Type material. Holotype — ♀, South Korea (GW) [Gangwon-do], Yeongwoi-gun, Jungdong-myeon, Hwawon 2-ri, Mt. Yemisan, 37°9ʹ6.85ʹʹN 128°38ʹ7.03ʹʹE, 24.V–7.VI.2017, Hyeong-Keon Lee (Malaise trap) (NIBR) . Paratype, ♀, Japan, Honshu, Aichi Pref., Shitaro-Cho, 26.VII–1.VIII.2015, Jimpei Imura leg. (KMNH) .</p><p>Diagnosis. Head as long as wide in dorsal view, gradually tapers toward occipital carina with genae not swollen in dorsal and frontal views (Fig. 9B, E); metanotum smooth along posterior margin (Fig. 9F); propodeum mainly smooth dorsally and only weakly punctured along posterior margin (Fig. 9F).</p><p>Description. Female (holotype). Body length 1.3 mm; fore wing length 1.15 mm; antenna length 0.75 mm. Body and A1 dark brown; tegula, mandible and A2–A12 yellowish brown; legs yellow.</p><p>Head mainly smooth with scattered setigerous punctures and upstanding setae: in dorsal view elongate (23: 22), and almost as wide as mesosoma; in lateral view 1.5 times as long as high. Clypeus transverse (about twice as long as wide) but epistomal sulcus indistinct, not convex. Tentorial pits large. Labrum narrow, semicircular, weakly visible, smooth and bare. Head 1.2 times as wide as of pleurostomal distance. Mandibles slightly overlapping, bidentate, with lower tooth slightly wider. Height of head 2.9× of eye height and malar space 1.6× of eye height. Eyes with few long setae. Ocelli tiny, frontal oculus largest, LOL 2.3 times as long as diameter of frontal oculus, POL 1.4 times as long as OOL.</p><p>Antenna. A1 cylindrical, slightly curved in lateral view, longitudinally strigose ventrally, reticulate rugose dorsally, densely setose and with simple apical rim. A 2 in dorsal view sub-cylindrical, in lateral view obliquely truncated at base. Antennomeres without MGS brush and not flattened on ventral side. In lateral view, ratios of length to width of antennomeres as in Fig. 10E.</p><p>Mesosoma 1.6 times as wide as high, in dorsal view 1.4 times as long as wide. Neck bare and coarsely rugose. Cervical pronotal area with few setae, anterior part of it almost vertical, smooth and bare, posterior part of it deeply punctured along posterior margin; pronotal shoulders rounded. Lateral side of pronotum mainly smooth and bare and only dorsally and ventrally sculptured (Fig. 10C). Mesoscutum 1.7 times as wide as long, flattened with few upstanding setae on it; mesoscutal suprahumeral sulcus distinct and smoothed only medially; humeral sulcus smoothed. Scutellum flattened with foveolate scutoscutellar sulcus; axilla mainly smooth and sculptured along lateral margin; axillar depression sculptured and shortly pubescent; scutellar disk large, wide and sculptured laterally. Lateral side of mesopleuron longitudinally carinate dorsally, with distinct sternaulus and mesepimeral sulcus, epicnemial pit present as shallow depression and shortly pubescent inside. Ventral side of mesopleuron with acetabular carina and postacetabular sulcus distinct and situated close to fore coxae, foveolate mesodiscrimen, mesopleural epicoxal sulcus and carina. Metanotum with few scattered setae smooth medially but rugose laterally and foveolate along anterior margin. Dorsal side of propodeum mainly smooth but with distinct transverse anterior carina of the metapectal-propodeal complex and deep punctuation along transverse posterior carina of the metapectal-propodeal complex; posterior margin of propodeum in dorsal view not arcuate. Metapleuron smooth medially and rugose along the edges. Lateral side of propodeum between plicae and metapleural carina depressed, coarsely rugose and setose (Fig. 11D, E). Nuchal area shortly pubescent and coarsely sculptured.</p><p>All legs with tarsus about as long as tibia, both with numerous stiff setae; femora broadened, with short basal stalk.</p><p>Fore wing clear, 2.8 times as long as wide and 1.5 times as long as hind wing; the single vein of the fore wing gradually disappeared, not reaching even third of fore wing length (Fig. 11 С).</p><p>Metasoma. Petiole barrel-shaped, 1.1 times as long as its maximum width, deeply punctured with weakly expressed longitudinal carinae.Base of T2 arched and bare, with large lateral corners that carinate sculptured dorsally, anterior margin medially smooth; posteriorly T2 smooth with few long setae; T3‒T6 short with micropunctation and a row of setae laterally; T7 about 1.6 times as long as T6, with a row of strong setae and not exposed and not setose cerci; T8 slightly shorter than T6, micropunctured, with few strong setae. S2 sculptured and setose antero-medially, smooth posteriorly and laterally; betyloid line distinct in its anterior half; base of S2 arched, with deep lateral depression and coarsely sculptured median protrusion. S3‒S5 with fine punctuation medially and few long setae. S6 with scattered setae. Ovipositor distinctly longer than T3–T8 measured together; sheaths of ovipositor short and thick, with wide smooth and flat area on the top, which surrounded with strong long setae (Fig. 10B. D).</p><p>Etymology. The new species is named in honor of the well-known entomologist and expert on Orthoptera, Prof. Sergey Yu. Storozhenko.</p><p>Distribution. Japan (Honshu), South Korea.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/084687C2FFD7FFB8FF13F0DAFD7CFA13	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Chemyreva, Vasilisa G.;Kolyada, Victor A.;Ku, Deok-Seo	Chemyreva, Vasilisa G., Kolyada, Victor A., Ku, Deok-Seo (2025): Review of the Palaearctic species of the genera Aneuropria Kieffer, 1905 and Labolips Förster, 1856 (Hymenoptera, Diapriidae) with description of a new species from South Korea and Japan. Zootaxa 5715 (1): 119-136, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.9
