taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03BF09730102353A05CE3FEA944FF9BB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13698765/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13698765	FIGURE 1. Ichnanthus robustus. A. Habit (including inflorescence); B. Culm, leaf sheath base (node region), and leaf blade base; C. Pulvini at the base of the primary branches; D. Segment of an inflorescence branch with pairs of spikelets; E. Pair of spikelets, lateral view; F. Spikelet, dorsal view; G. Spikelet, ventral view; H–J. Young upper anthecium; H. ventral view; I. lateral view; J. dorsal view; K–M. Mature upper anthecium; K. ventral view; L. lateral view; M. dorsal view. (based on C. Silva et al. 1049)	FIGURE 1. Ichnanthus robustus. A. Habit (including inflorescence); B. Culm, leaf sheath base (node region), and leaf blade base; C. Pulvini at the base of the primary branches; D. Segment of an inflorescence branch with pairs of spikelets; E. Pair of spikelets, lateral view; F. Spikelet, dorsal view; G. Spikelet, ventral view; H–J. Young upper anthecium; H. ventral view; I. lateral view; J. dorsal view; K–M. Mature upper anthecium; K. ventral view; L. lateral view; M. dorsal view. (based on C. Silva et al. 1049)	2017-10-27	Oliveira, Reyjane Patricia;Junior, Luiz Antonio De Jesus;Mota, Aline Costa Da;Silva, Christian		Zenodo	biologists	Oliveira, Reyjane Patricia;Junior, Luiz Antonio De Jesus;Mota, Aline Costa Da;Silva, Christian			
03BF09730102353A05CE3FEA944FF9BB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13698767/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13698767	FIGURE 2. Ichnanthus robustus.A. Habitat,montane forestin SouthernBahia; B. Habit; C. Baseof the plant,including culms,adventitious roots, and rhizome; D. Culm, leaf sheath base (node region), and leaf blade base; E. Node region glabrous; F. Trichomes in the adaxial surface of the leaf blade; G. Vinaceous spots in the abaxial surface of the leaf blade; H. Inflorescence; I. Pair of spikelets, dorsal (left) and lateral (right) views; J. Spikelet, dorsal view. (Photos by C. Silva)	FIGURE 2. Ichnanthus robustus.A. Habitat,montane forestin SouthernBahia; B. Habit; C. Baseof the plant,including culms,adventitious roots, and rhizome; D. Culm, leaf sheath base (node region), and leaf blade base; E. Node region glabrous; F. Trichomes in the adaxial surface of the leaf blade; G. Vinaceous spots in the abaxial surface of the leaf blade; H. Inflorescence; I. Pair of spikelets, dorsal (left) and lateral (right) views; J. Spikelet, dorsal view. (Photos by C. Silva)	2017-10-27	Oliveira, Reyjane Patricia;Junior, Luiz Antonio De Jesus;Mota, Aline Costa Da;Silva, Christian		Zenodo	biologists	Oliveira, Reyjane Patricia;Junior, Luiz Antonio De Jesus;Mota, Aline Costa Da;Silva, Christian			
03BF09730102353A05CE3FEA944FF9BB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13698769/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13698769	FIGURE 3. Stereomicroscope (SM) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the upper anthecium. A–H. Ichnanthus robustus [SM: Amorim et al. 780 (CEPEC) and Silva & Daneu 1057 (HUEFS); SEM: Amorim et al. 780 (CEPEC), Borges et al. 444 (HUEFS), and Silva & Daneu 1057 (HUEFS)]. A. Young anthecium, ventral view; B. Mature anthecium, ventral view; C. Young anthecium, ventral view; D. Mature anthecium, ventral view; E. Young anthecium, base, lateral view; F. Mature anthecium, base, dorsal view; G. Mature anthecium, apex, ventral view; H. Mature anthecium, apex, lateral view. I–M. Ichnanthus bambusiflorus [SM: Ribeiro-Filho 221 (HUEFS); SEM: Silva et al. 295 (HUEFS)]. I. Young anthecium, ventral view; J. Mature anthecium, ventral view; K–M. Partially mature anthecium; K. Ventral view; L. Base, dorsal view; M. Apex, lateral view. [Scale bars A, B, I, J = 1 mm; C–H, K–M = 500 μm. GL = germination lid; L = lemma; P = palea; PB = palea base; R = rachilla; SB = silica bodies; ST = stomata; W = winged appendages]	FIGURE 3. Stereomicroscope (SM) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the upper anthecium. A–H. Ichnanthus robustus [SM: Amorim et al. 780 (CEPEC) and Silva & Daneu 1057 (HUEFS); SEM: Amorim et al. 780 (CEPEC), Borges et al. 444 (HUEFS), and Silva & Daneu 1057 (HUEFS)]. A. Young anthecium, ventral view; B. Mature anthecium, ventral view; C. Young anthecium, ventral view; D. Mature anthecium, ventral view; E. Young anthecium, base, lateral view; F. Mature anthecium, base, dorsal view; G. Mature anthecium, apex, ventral view; H. Mature anthecium, apex, lateral view. I–M. Ichnanthus bambusiflorus [SM: Ribeiro-Filho 221 (HUEFS); SEM: Silva et al. 295 (HUEFS)]. I. Young anthecium, ventral view; J. Mature anthecium, ventral view; K–M. Partially mature anthecium; K. Ventral view; L. Base, dorsal view; M. Apex, lateral view. [Scale bars A, B, I, J = 1 mm; C–H, K–M = 500 μm. GL = germination lid; L = lemma; P = palea; PB = palea base; R = rachilla; SB = silica bodies; ST = stomata; W = winged appendages]	2017-10-27	Oliveira, Reyjane Patricia;Junior, Luiz Antonio De Jesus;Mota, Aline Costa Da;Silva, Christian		Zenodo	biologists	Oliveira, Reyjane Patricia;Junior, Luiz Antonio De Jesus;Mota, Aline Costa Da;Silva, Christian			
03BF09730102353A05CE3FEA944FF9BB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13698771/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13698771	FIGURE 4. Part of the trees resulting from the Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood (ML) individual analyses representing the Ichnanthus clade. Bayesian posterior probabilities> 0.5 and ML bootstrap support values> 50% are reported below branches. A. ndhF Bayesian consensus tree; B. ndhF ML tree; C. ITS Bayesian consensus tree; D. ITS ML tree. Ichnanthus robustus is highlighted in bold, followed by a bracket. The accession followed by an asterisk was identified as Ichnanthus sp. BA in Silva et al. (2015b; voucher: Oliveira et al. 1216).	FIGURE 4. Part of the trees resulting from the Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood (ML) individual analyses representing the Ichnanthus clade. Bayesian posterior probabilities> 0.5 and ML bootstrap support values> 50% are reported below branches. A. ndhF Bayesian consensus tree; B. ndhF ML tree; C. ITS Bayesian consensus tree; D. ITS ML tree. Ichnanthus robustus is highlighted in bold, followed by a bracket. The accession followed by an asterisk was identified as Ichnanthus sp. BA in Silva et al. (2015b; voucher: Oliveira et al. 1216).	2017-10-27	Oliveira, Reyjane Patricia;Junior, Luiz Antonio De Jesus;Mota, Aline Costa Da;Silva, Christian		Zenodo	biologists	Oliveira, Reyjane Patricia;Junior, Luiz Antonio De Jesus;Mota, Aline Costa Da;Silva, Christian			
03BF09730102353A05CE3FEA944FF9BB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13698773/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13698773	FIGURE 5. Bayesian consensus tree resulting from the combined (ndhF and ITS) analysis. Bayesian posterior probabilities> 0.5 and Maximum Likelihood bootstrap support values> 50% are reported above and below branches, respectively. Ichnanthus robustus is highlighted in bold, followed by a bracket.	FIGURE 5. Bayesian consensus tree resulting from the combined (ndhF and ITS) analysis. Bayesian posterior probabilities> 0.5 and Maximum Likelihood bootstrap support values> 50% are reported above and below branches, respectively. Ichnanthus robustus is highlighted in bold, followed by a bracket.	2017-10-27	Oliveira, Reyjane Patricia;Junior, Luiz Antonio De Jesus;Mota, Aline Costa Da;Silva, Christian		Zenodo	biologists	Oliveira, Reyjane Patricia;Junior, Luiz Antonio De Jesus;Mota, Aline Costa Da;Silva, Christian			
03BF09730102353A05CE3FEA944FF9BB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13698775/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13698775	FIGURE 6. Cross-sections of the leaf blades showing the midrib and the mesophyll of Ichnanthus robustus [Calderón et al.2443 (CEPEC), Silva et al. 1049 (HUEFS), and Silva & Daneu 1057 (HUEFS)] and I. bambusiflorus [Silva et al. 1025 (HUEFS)]. A–D. I. robustus. A. Midrib overview; B. Mesophyll overview; C. First order vascular bundle; D. Third order vascular bundle. E–H. I. bambusiflorus. E. Midrib and mesophyll overview; F. Mesophyll, third order vascular bundles; G. First order vascular bundle; H. Third order vascular bundle. [Scale bars A–C, E = 100 μm; D, G–H = 20 μm; F = 50 μm]	FIGURE 6. Cross-sections of the leaf blades showing the midrib and the mesophyll of Ichnanthus robustus [Calderón et al.2443 (CEPEC), Silva et al. 1049 (HUEFS), and Silva & Daneu 1057 (HUEFS)] and I. bambusiflorus [Silva et al. 1025 (HUEFS)]. A–D. I. robustus. A. Midrib overview; B. Mesophyll overview; C. First order vascular bundle; D. Third order vascular bundle. E–H. I. bambusiflorus. E. Midrib and mesophyll overview; F. Mesophyll, third order vascular bundles; G. First order vascular bundle; H. Third order vascular bundle. [Scale bars A–C, E = 100 μm; D, G–H = 20 μm; F = 50 μm]	2017-10-27	Oliveira, Reyjane Patricia;Junior, Luiz Antonio De Jesus;Mota, Aline Costa Da;Silva, Christian		Zenodo	biologists	Oliveira, Reyjane Patricia;Junior, Luiz Antonio De Jesus;Mota, Aline Costa Da;Silva, Christian			
