identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03A98794BF538E4DFF7D171ED383F8DD.text	03A98794BF538E4DFF7D171ED383F8DD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Colpoclypeus Lucchese	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Colpoclypeus Lucchese</p>
            <p> Colpoclypeus Lucchese 1941: 33 . Type species:  Colpoclypeus silvestri Lucchese , by monotypy. </p>
            <p>Diagnosis. Female antenna with two funicular segments (Fig. 1a, c); male antenna with 3 funicular segments; frons with transverse sulcus just ventral to anterior ocellus (Fig. 1b); notauli curving to meet apical corner of axilla and not extending to scuto-scutellar suture (Fig. 1d); scutellum without longitudinal grooves (Fig. 1d); clypeus broadly bilobed with a distinct median incision (Fig. 1a); propleura meeting medially for about half medial length, separated posteriorly so as to expose posterior part of prosternum.</p>
            <p> Discussion.  Colpoclypeus can be easily identified using the keys to eulophine genera of Europe (Askew 1968) and North America (Schauff et al. 1997). It is more difficult to assign it to tribe, as is indicated by its recent placement in either the Eulophini by Gauthier et al. (2000) or the Cirrospilini by Ubaidillah et al. (2003). </p>
            <p> Gauthier et al. (2000) separated the Eulophinae into three tribes (Eulophini, Cirrospilini, Elasmini) based on morphological and molecular data. One morphological synapomorphy was provided to support the Eulophini — the propleura meeting posteriorly along their entire medial margin and covering the prosternum (Gauthier et al. 2000, fig. 7A). It was noted at the time that two genera,  Colpoclypeus and  Dicladocerus Westwood , were assigned to the Eulophini that have the propleura slightly separated posteriorly, displaying an intermediate condition between the two states. Females of Eulophini all have either three or four funicle segments, with the exception of  Colpoclypeus , which has two. The Cirrospilini were characterized by the face usually having a transverse sulcus about midway between the torulus and anterior ocellus (Gauthier et al. 2000, fig. 8A −D), the propleura separated posteriorly so as to expose the prosternum (Gauthier et al. 2000, fig. 7B), the postmarginal vein often equal in length or shorter than the stigma vein, and the female antenna generally with two or three funicle segments.  Colpoclypeus has a transverse sulcus on the frons, but it is much closer to the anterior ocellus. It remains to be determined whether this sulcus is homologous with the transverse sulcus about midway between the torulus and anterior ocellus that characterizes Cirrospilini. With the exception of the aberrant position of this transverse sulcus,  Colpoclypeus might best be classified in the Cirrospilini. However, Gauthier et al. (2000: 533) considered that it was more likely “just an aberrant member of the Eulophini”. The Eulophini and Cirrospilini were separated with a high level of support in the molecular trees, but unfortunately,  Colpoclypeus was not included in the molecular data set. </p>
            <p> Ubaidillah et al. (2003) provided a cladistic analysis of the Cirrospilini based on morphological characters. A strict consensus tree based on their analysis showed both  Colpoclypeus and  Dicladocerus were placed in the Cirrospilini where they form a clade with  Pseudiglyphus Girault. It should be noted that  Dicladocerus was included in the molecular data set analyzed in Gauthier et al. (2000), where it was placed in the Eulophini. </p>
            <p> The description of a second species of  Colpoclypeus from Mexico confirms the validity and important diagnostic characters of this genus, as well as highlights the difficulties with its tribal placement. The addition of molecular data should help to resolve this issue. </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A98794BF538E4DFF7D171ED383F8DD	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sánchez-García, José Antonio;Pineda, Samuel;Martínez, Ana Mabel;Rebollar-Alviter, Angel;Juárez-Gutiérrez, Ana Celestina;Cruz, Ignacio López;Salle, John La;Figueroa, José Isaac	Sánchez-García, José Antonio, Pineda, Samuel, Martínez, Ana Mabel, Rebollar-Alviter, Angel, Juárez-Gutiérrez, Ana Celestina, Cruz, Ignacio López, Salle, John La, Figueroa, José Isaac (2011): A new species of Colpoclypeus Lucchese (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) from Mexico. Zootaxa 2830: 64-68, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.277306
03A98794BF508E4FFF7D15E5D40EFC1D.text	03A98794BF508E4FFF7D15E5D40EFC1D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Colpoclypeus michoacanensis Sanchez & Figueroa	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Colpoclypeus michoacanensis Sánchez &amp; Figueroa ,  new species</p>
            <p>(Fig. 1a –h)</p>
            <p>FEMALE. Color: dark metallic blue green; eyes reddish brown; scape yellowish with dark area medially, pedicel brown dorsally, funicle and clava yellowish brown; wings hyaline, veins yellowish brown; legs yellowish with medial area (0.70 length) of femora dark; coxae dark metallic blue green, hind coxa yellowish ventrally; metasoma yellowish with a dark band dorsally.</p>
            <p>Head: in frontal view subtriangular (Fig. 1a), head width/height =1.35–1.46; with striate sculpture and short setae on vertex, on frons adjacent to medial margin of compound eye, malar space, and clypeus; setae on compound eye shorter; malar suture present; malar space 0.72–0.85X as long as eye height; transverse sulcus present just ventral to anterior ocellus (Fig. 1b); antenna with scape, pedicel, two anelli, two funicle and three claval segments; antenna with pale, short setae and scape with longitudinal striae; scape length 5.00–6.25X its width; pedicel slightly shorter than, or equal in length to 1st funicular segment; funiculars and club moderately setose and with many longitudinal sensilla; 1st funicular segment slightly longer than 2nd; combined length of 1st and 2nd funicular segments similar to clava length. Clypeus bilobed (Fig. 1a).</p>
            <p>Mesosoma: mesosoma 2.0X as long as high, and 1.00–1.24X as long as gaster (Fig. 1c); pronotum with reticulate sculpture and with some long setae along posterior margin; notauli incomplete; mesonotum sculptured (Fig. 1d) as pronotum with some sparse setae; scutellum without submedian grooves, with two pairs of setae; mesopleural suture almost straight (Fig. 1e); transepimeral sulcus present and distinct; upper mesepimeron smooth, lower mesepimeron slightly sculptured; supracoxal flange absent; dorsellum large, strongly sculptured, crenulate/multidentate; propodeum smooth, polished, with strong median carina and plicae (Fig. 1f); propodeal callus with 12 long and thin setae. Forewing: costal cell with a ventral line of 12 setae extending from base to apex; postmarginal vein 0.77–0.83X as long as stigmal vein; stigma slightly swollen; marginal fringe as long as width of costal cell at widest point; length: 1.36–1.92 mm. Legs: length of fore femur 4– 5 X its width; hind leg with femur, tibia and basitarsus length/width =4.30–5.00, 9.14–13.4 and 3.33–4.80X, respectively.</p>
            <p>Metasoma: gaster with some sparse setae laterally, petiole transverse, barely visible in dorsal view; ovipositor 0.38–0.64X as long as hind tibia (Fig. 1c); ovipositor in some specimens with a black spot basally and with some sparse setae in apical half.</p>
            <p>Body length: 1.53–2.01 mm.</p>
            <p>MALE. Sexual dimorphism evident; male smaller than female, body length 1.11–1.66 mm; fore femur very swollen, only 2X as long as wide (Fig. 1 g), tarsomeres of fore leg shorter than female; basal 3 tarsomeres wider than long or quadrate; arolia large; head higher than female, head width/height = 1.08–1.25; funicle with three and clava with two segments. Genitalia (Fig. 1 h) with subgenital plate exposed; aedeagus elongate, bifid; digitus with 4 or 5 apical teeth and one basal tooth; with pyramidal-shaped, raised intervolsellar process.</p>
            <p> Host.  Argyrotaenia montezumae Walsingham (  Lepidoptera :  Tortricidae ). </p>
            <p> Type material. Holotype Ψ, MÉXICO, Michoacán. Los Reyes, Rancho Santino, 19°39’079’’ N and 102°28’695’’ W, 1409 msnm, 13-X-2009, I. López C., Host:  Argyrotaenia montezumae on  Rubus sp. (blackberry) (IIAF). 49 Ψ, 16ɗ Paratypes: MÉXICO, Michoacán: 24 Ψ, 11 ɗ, same data as holotype (18Ψ, 16ɗ: IIAF; 2 Ψ, 1ɗ each: ANIC, CIIDIR-IPN, USNM); 10 Ψ, 4 ɗ same data as holotype but 11-XI-2009 (IIAF); 4 Ψ, 1 ɗ same data as holotype but 21-XI-2009 (IIAF); 11 Ψ Tangancicuaro, 2-X-2007, I. López C., Host:  Argyrotaenia montezumae on  Rubus sp. (blackberry) (IIAF). </p>
            <p>Etymology. This species is so named because it is from Mexican state of Michoacán.</p>
            <p>Distribution. MÉXICO (Michoacán).</p>
            <p> Remarks. This species is similar to  C. florus . The two species are distinguished by the following key. </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A98794BF508E4FFF7D15E5D40EFC1D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sánchez-García, José Antonio;Pineda, Samuel;Martínez, Ana Mabel;Rebollar-Alviter, Angel;Juárez-Gutiérrez, Ana Celestina;Cruz, Ignacio López;Salle, John La;Figueroa, José Isaac	Sánchez-García, José Antonio, Pineda, Samuel, Martínez, Ana Mabel, Rebollar-Alviter, Angel, Juárez-Gutiérrez, Ana Celestina, Cruz, Ignacio López, Salle, John La, Figueroa, José Isaac (2011): A new species of Colpoclypeus Lucchese (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) from Mexico. Zootaxa 2830: 64-68, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.277306
03A98794BF518E4FFF7D16AAD4AFFAEF.text	03A98794BF518E4FFF7D16AAD4AFFAEF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Colpoclypeus	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Key to species of  Colpoclypeus</p>
            <p>1. Female............................................................................................. 2</p>
            <p>1’. Male................................................................................................ 3</p>
            <p> 2. Legs yellowish with medial area (0.70 length) of femora dark. Head width/height = 1.35–1.46. Scape length 5.00–6.25X its width. Mesopleural suture almost straight (Fig. 1e). Supracoxal flange absent.........  Colpoclypeus michoacanensis n. sp.</p>
            <p> 2’. Legs completely yellowish. Head width/height = 1.18. Scape length 4.50X its width. Mesopleural suture curved (Fig. 1 j). Supracoxal flange present.......................................................  Colpoclypeus florus (Walker)</p>
            <p> 3. Fore femur strongly swollen (Fig. 1 g), twice as long as wide; fore tarsus with basal 3 tarsomeres all wider than long or quadrate. Genitalia: digitus with 4 or 5 apical teeth and one basal tooth; with a pyramidal-shaped raised intervolsellar process (Fig. 1 h)....................................................................  Colpoclypeus michoacanensis n. sp.</p>
            <p> 3’. Fore femur not swollen, 4.4–5.0X as long as wide; fore tarsus with basal 3 tarsomeres all longer than wide. Genitalia: digitus with two apical teeth and without basal tooth; without a pyramidal-shaped raised intervolsellar process (Fig. 1 i)........................................................................................  Colpoclypeus florus (Walker)</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A98794BF518E4FFF7D16AAD4AFFAEF	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sánchez-García, José Antonio;Pineda, Samuel;Martínez, Ana Mabel;Rebollar-Alviter, Angel;Juárez-Gutiérrez, Ana Celestina;Cruz, Ignacio López;Salle, John La;Figueroa, José Isaac	Sánchez-García, José Antonio, Pineda, Samuel, Martínez, Ana Mabel, Rebollar-Alviter, Angel, Juárez-Gutiérrez, Ana Celestina, Cruz, Ignacio López, Salle, John La, Figueroa, José Isaac (2011): A new species of Colpoclypeus Lucchese (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) from Mexico. Zootaxa 2830: 64-68, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.277306
