taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03A387C13013870B11ABF8930A80FEE5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802093/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802093	Figure 7. Habitus in vivo of Conapesquius heteracanthus (Mello-Leitão, 1936), from Brazil, Paraná, Antonina, RPPN Guaricica.♂ (A–C) and ♀ (D–F). Photographs of Adriano Kury.	Figure 7. Habitus in vivo of Conapesquius heteracanthus (Mello-Leitão, 1936), from Brazil, Paraná, Antonina, RPPN Guaricica.♂ (A–C) and ♀ (D–F). Photographs of Adriano Kury.	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C13013870B11ABF8930A80FEE5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802110/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802110	Figure 14. Conapesquius rectipes (Roewer, 1913), ♂ (IBSP 6028). A, habitus, dorsal view.B, ocularium, anterior view.C, habitus, lateral view. D, armature of scutal area III, posterior view.E, right femur IV, dorsal view. F, same, prolateral view. G, same, ventral view. H, same, retrolateral view. I, right patella and tibia IV, dorsal view.J, same, ventral view.Scale bars:1 mm (B, D), 3 mm (A, C, E–J).	Figure 14. Conapesquius rectipes (Roewer, 1913), ♂ (IBSP 6028). A, habitus, dorsal view.B, ocularium, anterior view.C, habitus, lateral view. D, armature of scutal area III, posterior view.E, right femur IV, dorsal view. F, same, prolateral view. G, same, ventral view. H, same, retrolateral view. I, right patella and tibia IV, dorsal view.J, same, ventral view.Scale bars:1 mm (B, D), 3 mm (A, C, E–J).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C13013870B11ABF8930A80FEE5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802116/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802116	Figure 16. Conapesquius spinifemur (B. Soares, 1945), ♂ holotype (MHNCI 177)!. A, habitus, dorsal view. B, same, ventral view.C, same, anterior view.D, same, posterior view. E, same, lateral view. Scale bars = 3 mm.	Figure 16. Conapesquius spinifemur (B. Soares, 1945), ♂ holotype (MHNCI 177)!. A, habitus, dorsal view. B, same, ventral view.C, same, anterior view.D, same, posterior view. E, same, lateral view. Scale bars = 3 mm.	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C13013870B11ABF8930A80FEE5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802102/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802102	Figure 10. Conapesquius heteracanthus (Mello-Leitão, 1936), ♂ (MNRJ 60568). A, habitus, dorsal view. B, ocularium, anterior view. C, habitus, lateral view.D, armature of scutal area III, posterior view. E, right femur and patella IV, dorsal view.F, same, prolateral view. G, right femur IV, ventral view.H, same, retrolateral view.I, right tibia IV, dorsal view. J, same, ventral view.♂ syntype (MNRJ 42278). K, coxa IV, showing prodorsal and retrolateral apophyses, dorsal view. L, detail of the coxa IV prodorsal apophysis, lateral view.Scale bars:1 mm (B, D, K–L), 2 mm (I–J), 3 mm (A, C), 5 mm (E–H).	Figure 10. Conapesquius heteracanthus (Mello-Leitão, 1936), ♂ (MNRJ 60568). A, habitus, dorsal view. B, ocularium, anterior view. C, habitus, lateral view.D, armature of scutal area III, posterior view. E, right femur and patella IV, dorsal view.F, same, prolateral view. G, right femur IV, ventral view.H, same, retrolateral view.I, right tibia IV, dorsal view. J, same, ventral view.♂ syntype (MNRJ 42278). K, coxa IV, showing prodorsal and retrolateral apophyses, dorsal view. L, detail of the coxa IV prodorsal apophysis, lateral view.Scale bars:1 mm (B, D, K–L), 2 mm (I–J), 3 mm (A, C), 5 mm (E–H).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C13013870B11ABF8930A80FEE5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802100/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802100	Figure 9. Conapesquius heteracanthus (Mello-Leitão, 1936), ♂ (MNRJ 60568). A, habitus, dorsal view. B, same, lateral view. C, same, ventral view. ♀ (same voucher). D, habitus, dorsal view.E, same, lateral view.F, same, ventral view. Scale bars = 3 mm.	Figure 9. Conapesquius heteracanthus (Mello-Leitão, 1936), ♂ (MNRJ 60568). A, habitus, dorsal view. B, same, lateral view. C, same, ventral view. ♀ (same voucher). D, habitus, dorsal view.E, same, lateral view.F, same, ventral view. Scale bars = 3 mm.	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C13013870B11ABF8930A80FEE5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802108/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802108	Figure 13. Conapesquius rectipes (Roewer, 1913), ♂ (IBSP 6028). A, habitus, dorsal view.B, same, lateral view.C, same, ventral view.♀ (same voucher).D, habitus, dorsal view. E, same, lateral view. F, same, ventral view.Scale bars = 3 mm.	Figure 13. Conapesquius rectipes (Roewer, 1913), ♂ (IBSP 6028). A, habitus, dorsal view.B, same, lateral view.C, same, ventral view.♀ (same voucher).D, habitus, dorsal view. E, same, lateral view. F, same, ventral view.Scale bars = 3 mm.	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C13013870B11ABF8930A80FEE5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802085/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802085	Figure 3. South Brazil, showing distribution of Conapesquius species. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al. 2022): Araucaria Forest province (in light green) and Atlantic province (in dark green).	Figure 3. South Brazil, showing distribution of Conapesquius species. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al. 2022): Araucaria Forest province (in light green) and Atlantic province (in dark green).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C130148707111BFEB6082DFA06.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802087/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802087	Figure 4. Conapesquius brevifemur (Soares & Soares,1947), ♂ (MNRJ 18926)!. A, habitus, dorsal view.B, same, ventral view. C, same, anterior view. D, same, posterior view.E, same, lateral view.Scale bars = 3 mm.	Figure 4. Conapesquius brevifemur (Soares & Soares,1947), ♂ (MNRJ 18926)!. A, habitus, dorsal view.B, same, ventral view. C, same, anterior view. D, same, posterior view.E, same, lateral view.Scale bars = 3 mm.	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C130148707111BFEB6082DFA06.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802085/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802085	Figure 3. South Brazil, showing distribution of Conapesquius species. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al. 2022): Araucaria Forest province (in light green) and Atlantic province (in dark green).	Figure 3. South Brazil, showing distribution of Conapesquius species. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al. 2022): Araucaria Forest province (in light green) and Atlantic province (in dark green).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C13018870112DDFA130B18FA82.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802093/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802093	Figure 7. Habitus in vivo of Conapesquius heteracanthus (Mello-Leitão, 1936), from Brazil, Paraná, Antonina, RPPN Guaricica.♂ (A–C) and ♀ (D–F). Photographs of Adriano Kury.	Figure 7. Habitus in vivo of Conapesquius heteracanthus (Mello-Leitão, 1936), from Brazil, Paraná, Antonina, RPPN Guaricica.♂ (A–C) and ♀ (D–F). Photographs of Adriano Kury.	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C13018870112DDFA130B18FA82.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802100/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802100	Figure 9. Conapesquius heteracanthus (Mello-Leitão, 1936), ♂ (MNRJ 60568). A, habitus, dorsal view. B, same, lateral view. C, same, ventral view. ♀ (same voucher). D, habitus, dorsal view.E, same, lateral view.F, same, ventral view. Scale bars = 3 mm.	Figure 9. Conapesquius heteracanthus (Mello-Leitão, 1936), ♂ (MNRJ 60568). A, habitus, dorsal view. B, same, lateral view. C, same, ventral view. ♀ (same voucher). D, habitus, dorsal view.E, same, lateral view.F, same, ventral view. Scale bars = 3 mm.	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C13018870112DDFA130B18FA82.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802102/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802102	Figure 10. Conapesquius heteracanthus (Mello-Leitão, 1936), ♂ (MNRJ 60568). A, habitus, dorsal view. B, ocularium, anterior view. C, habitus, lateral view.D, armature of scutal area III, posterior view. E, right femur and patella IV, dorsal view.F, same, prolateral view. G, right femur IV, ventral view.H, same, retrolateral view.I, right tibia IV, dorsal view. J, same, ventral view.♂ syntype (MNRJ 42278). K, coxa IV, showing prodorsal and retrolateral apophyses, dorsal view. L, detail of the coxa IV prodorsal apophysis, lateral view.Scale bars:1 mm (B, D, K–L), 2 mm (I–J), 3 mm (A, C), 5 mm (E–H).	Figure 10. Conapesquius heteracanthus (Mello-Leitão, 1936), ♂ (MNRJ 60568). A, habitus, dorsal view. B, ocularium, anterior view. C, habitus, lateral view.D, armature of scutal area III, posterior view. E, right femur and patella IV, dorsal view.F, same, prolateral view. G, right femur IV, ventral view.H, same, retrolateral view.I, right tibia IV, dorsal view. J, same, ventral view.♂ syntype (MNRJ 42278). K, coxa IV, showing prodorsal and retrolateral apophyses, dorsal view. L, detail of the coxa IV prodorsal apophysis, lateral view.Scale bars:1 mm (B, D, K–L), 2 mm (I–J), 3 mm (A, C), 5 mm (E–H).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C13018870112DDFA130B18FA82.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802085/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802085	Figure 3. South Brazil, showing distribution of Conapesquius species. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al. 2022): Araucaria Forest province (in light green) and Atlantic province (in dark green).	Figure 3. South Brazil, showing distribution of Conapesquius species. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al. 2022): Araucaria Forest province (in light green) and Atlantic province (in dark green).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C1301E873C12C0FA900BF4FC7A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802106/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802106	Figure 12.Habitus in vivo of Conapesquius rectipes (Roewer,1913), from Brazil, Santa Catarina,São Bento do Sul, Centro de Estudos e Pesquisas Ambientais Rugendas. ♂ (A–C) and ♀ (D–F). Photographs of Pedro Martins.	Figure 12.Habitus in vivo of Conapesquius rectipes (Roewer,1913), from Brazil, Santa Catarina,São Bento do Sul, Centro de Estudos e Pesquisas Ambientais Rugendas. ♂ (A–C) and ♀ (D–F). Photographs of Pedro Martins.	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C1301E873C12C0FA900BF4FC7A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802108/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802108	Figure 13. Conapesquius rectipes (Roewer, 1913), ♂ (IBSP 6028). A, habitus, dorsal view.B, same, lateral view.C, same, ventral view.♀ (same voucher).D, habitus, dorsal view. E, same, lateral view. F, same, ventral view.Scale bars = 3 mm.	Figure 13. Conapesquius rectipes (Roewer, 1913), ♂ (IBSP 6028). A, habitus, dorsal view.B, same, lateral view.C, same, ventral view.♀ (same voucher).D, habitus, dorsal view. E, same, lateral view. F, same, ventral view.Scale bars = 3 mm.	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C1301E873C12C0FA900BF4FC7A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802110/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802110	Figure 14. Conapesquius rectipes (Roewer, 1913), ♂ (IBSP 6028). A, habitus, dorsal view.B, ocularium, anterior view.C, habitus, lateral view. D, armature of scutal area III, posterior view.E, right femur IV, dorsal view. F, same, prolateral view. G, same, ventral view. H, same, retrolateral view. I, right patella and tibia IV, dorsal view.J, same, ventral view.Scale bars:1 mm (B, D), 3 mm (A, C, E–J).	Figure 14. Conapesquius rectipes (Roewer, 1913), ♂ (IBSP 6028). A, habitus, dorsal view.B, ocularium, anterior view.C, habitus, lateral view. D, armature of scutal area III, posterior view.E, right femur IV, dorsal view. F, same, prolateral view. G, same, ventral view. H, same, retrolateral view. I, right patella and tibia IV, dorsal view.J, same, ventral view.Scale bars:1 mm (B, D), 3 mm (A, C, E–J).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C1301E873C12C0FA900BF4FC7A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802085/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802085	Figure 3. South Brazil, showing distribution of Conapesquius species. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al. 2022): Araucaria Forest province (in light green) and Atlantic province (in dark green).	Figure 3. South Brazil, showing distribution of Conapesquius species. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al. 2022): Araucaria Forest province (in light green) and Atlantic province (in dark green).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C1302387371298FC280DF9FCF9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802116/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802116	Figure 16. Conapesquius spinifemur (B. Soares, 1945), ♂ holotype (MHNCI 177)!. A, habitus, dorsal view. B, same, ventral view.C, same, anterior view.D, same, posterior view. E, same, lateral view. Scale bars = 3 mm.	Figure 16. Conapesquius spinifemur (B. Soares, 1945), ♂ holotype (MHNCI 177)!. A, habitus, dorsal view. B, same, ventral view.C, same, anterior view.D, same, posterior view. E, same, lateral view. Scale bars = 3 mm.	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C1302387371298FC280DF9FCF9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802118/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802118	Figure 17. Conapesquius spinifemur (B. Soares, 1945), ♂ (MHNCI 6538). A, habitus, dorsal view. B, same, lateral view. C, same, ventral view. ♀ (same voucher).D, habitus, dorsal view. E, same, lateral view. F, same, ventral view.Scale bars = 5 mm.	Figure 17. Conapesquius spinifemur (B. Soares, 1945), ♂ (MHNCI 6538). A, habitus, dorsal view. B, same, lateral view. C, same, ventral view. ♀ (same voucher).D, habitus, dorsal view. E, same, lateral view. F, same, ventral view.Scale bars = 5 mm.	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C1302387371298FC280DF9FCF9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802085/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802085	Figure 3. South Brazil, showing distribution of Conapesquius species. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al. 2022): Araucaria Forest province (in light green) and Atlantic province (in dark green).	Figure 3. South Brazil, showing distribution of Conapesquius species. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al. 2022): Araucaria Forest province (in light green) and Atlantic province (in dark green).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C1302387371298FC280DF9FCF9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802124/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802124	Figure 20. Conapesquius spinifemur (B. Soares, 1945), ♀ (MHNCI 6538). A, ocularium, anterior view. B, habitus, dorsal view.C, right trochanter–tibia IV, dorsal view. D, right trochanter–patella IV, ventral view. Scale bars:1 mm (A), 3 mm (B–D).	Figure 20. Conapesquius spinifemur (B. Soares, 1945), ♀ (MHNCI 6538). A, ocularium, anterior view. B, habitus, dorsal view.C, right trochanter–tibia IV, dorsal view. D, right trochanter–patella IV, ventral view. Scale bars:1 mm (A), 3 mm (B–D).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C1302887371640FCAA0CCDF96E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802126/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802126	Figure 21. South Brazil,showing distribution of Iamarinus species. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al. 2022): Araucaria Forest province (in light green) and Atlantic province (in dark green).	Figure 21. South Brazil,showing distribution of Iamarinus species. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al. 2022): Araucaria Forest province (in light green) and Atlantic province (in dark green).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C130288735110BF93E0D68F923.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802128/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802128	Figure 22. Iamarinus fenax, ♀ (MHNCI 6305). A, habitus, dorsal view.B, detail of the mesotergum and free tergites I–III, dorsal view. C, habitus, ventral view.D, same, lateral view.Scale bars = 5 mm.	Figure 22. Iamarinus fenax, ♀ (MHNCI 6305). A, habitus, dorsal view.B, detail of the mesotergum and free tergites I–III, dorsal view. C, habitus, ventral view.D, same, lateral view.Scale bars = 5 mm.	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C130288735110BF93E0D68F923.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802126/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802126	Figure 21. South Brazil,showing distribution of Iamarinus species. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al. 2022): Araucaria Forest province (in light green) and Atlantic province (in dark green).	Figure 21. South Brazil,showing distribution of Iamarinus species. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al. 2022): Araucaria Forest province (in light green) and Atlantic province (in dark green).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C1302A872F1198F9710C45FA32.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802132/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802132	Figure 24.Habitus in vivo of Iamarinus pontesi, from Brazil,Paraná, Antonina. ♂ (A–C) and ♀ (D–F). Photographs of Miguel Medrano (A–C) and Adriano Kury (D–E).	Figure 24.Habitus in vivo of Iamarinus pontesi, from Brazil,Paraná, Antonina. ♂ (A–C) and ♀ (D–F). Photographs of Miguel Medrano (A–C) and Adriano Kury (D–E).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C1302A872F1198F9710C45FA32.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802134/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802134	Figure 25. Iamarinus pontesi, ♂ holotype (MNRJ 2789). A, habitus, dorsal view. B, same, lateral view. C, same, ventral view. ♀ paratype (MNRJ 60562). D, habitus, dorsal view.E, same, lateral view.F, same, ventral view. Scale bars = 5 mm.	Figure 25. Iamarinus pontesi, ♂ holotype (MNRJ 2789). A, habitus, dorsal view. B, same, lateral view. C, same, ventral view. ♀ paratype (MNRJ 60562). D, habitus, dorsal view.E, same, lateral view.F, same, ventral view. Scale bars = 5 mm.	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C1302A872F1198F9710C45FA32.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802126/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802126	Figure 21. South Brazil,showing distribution of Iamarinus species. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al. 2022): Araucaria Forest province (in light green) and Atlantic province (in dark green).	Figure 21. South Brazil,showing distribution of Iamarinus species. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al. 2022): Araucaria Forest province (in light green) and Atlantic province (in dark green).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C1302A872F1198F9710C45FA32.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802142/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802142	Figure 28.Iamarinus pontesi, ♀ paratype (MNRJ 60562).A, ocularium, frontal view.B, habitus, dorsal view.C, right trochanter and femur IV, dorsal view. Scale bars: 1 mm (A), 3 mm (B–C).	Figure 28.Iamarinus pontesi, ♀ paratype (MNRJ 60562).A, ocularium, frontal view.B, habitus, dorsal view.C, right trochanter and femur IV, dorsal view. Scale bars: 1 mm (A), 3 mm (B–C).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C13030872E118BFA620869FEE5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802159/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802159	Figure 32. Oliverius jordanensis Soares & Soares,1945, ♂ (MNRJ 29845). A, ocularium, frontal view. B, habitus, dorsal view. C, same, lateral view. D, right femur IV, dorsal view.E, right femur–tibia IV, prolateral view.F, right femur IV, ventral view.G, right femur–tibia IV, retrolateral view. ♀ (same voucher). H, ocularium,frontal view. I, posterior margin of dorsal scutum and free tergites, dorsal view. J, right lateral margin of abdominal scutum and coxa IV, dorsal view.Scale bars:1 mm (A, H–J), 5 mm (B–G).	Figure 32. Oliverius jordanensis Soares & Soares,1945, ♂ (MNRJ 29845). A, ocularium, frontal view. B, habitus, dorsal view. C, same, lateral view. D, right femur IV, dorsal view.E, right femur–tibia IV, prolateral view.F, right femur IV, ventral view.G, right femur–tibia IV, retrolateral view. ♀ (same voucher). H, ocularium,frontal view. I, posterior margin of dorsal scutum and free tergites, dorsal view. J, right lateral margin of abdominal scutum and coxa IV, dorsal view.Scale bars:1 mm (A, H–J), 5 mm (B–G).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C13030872E118BFA620869FEE5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802152/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802152	Figure 31. Oliverius jordanensis Soares & Soares,1945, ♂ (MNRJ 29845). A, habitus, dorsal view.B, same, lateral view.C, same, ventral view. ♀ (same voucher).D, habitus, dorsal view. E, same, lateral view.F, same, ventral view.Scale bars = 5 mm.	Figure 31. Oliverius jordanensis Soares & Soares,1945, ♂ (MNRJ 29845). A, habitus, dorsal view.B, same, lateral view.C, same, ventral view. ♀ (same voucher).D, habitus, dorsal view. E, same, lateral view.F, same, ventral view.Scale bars = 5 mm.	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C13030872E118BFA620869FEE5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802148/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802148	Figure 30. Habitus in vivo of Oliverius jordanensis Soares & Soares,1945, from Brazil,Rio de Janeiro, Itatiaia (A–D) and Brazil,Minas Gerais, Itamonte (E–F). ♂ (A–E) and ♀ (F). Photographs of Adriano Kury.	Figure 30. Habitus in vivo of Oliverius jordanensis Soares & Soares,1945, from Brazil,Rio de Janeiro, Itatiaia (A–D) and Brazil,Minas Gerais, Itamonte (E–F). ♂ (A–E) and ♀ (F). Photographs of Adriano Kury.	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C13030872E118BFA620869FEE5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802144/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802144	Figure 29. Southeastern Brazil,showing distribution of Oliverius jordanensis Soares & Soares, 1945. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al.2022): Atlantic province (in dark green) and Paraná Forest province (in medium green).	Figure 29. Southeastern Brazil,showing distribution of Oliverius jordanensis Soares & Soares, 1945. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al.2022): Atlantic province (in dark green) and Paraná Forest province (in medium green).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C1303187291285FEB60C9AFBF9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802148/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802148	Figure 30. Habitus in vivo of Oliverius jordanensis Soares & Soares,1945, from Brazil,Rio de Janeiro, Itatiaia (A–D) and Brazil,Minas Gerais, Itamonte (E–F). ♂ (A–E) and ♀ (F). Photographs of Adriano Kury.	Figure 30. Habitus in vivo of Oliverius jordanensis Soares & Soares,1945, from Brazil,Rio de Janeiro, Itatiaia (A–D) and Brazil,Minas Gerais, Itamonte (E–F). ♂ (A–E) and ♀ (F). Photographs of Adriano Kury.	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C1303187291285FEB60C9AFBF9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802152/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802152	Figure 31. Oliverius jordanensis Soares & Soares,1945, ♂ (MNRJ 29845). A, habitus, dorsal view.B, same, lateral view.C, same, ventral view. ♀ (same voucher).D, habitus, dorsal view. E, same, lateral view.F, same, ventral view.Scale bars = 5 mm.	Figure 31. Oliverius jordanensis Soares & Soares,1945, ♂ (MNRJ 29845). A, habitus, dorsal view.B, same, lateral view.C, same, ventral view. ♀ (same voucher).D, habitus, dorsal view. E, same, lateral view.F, same, ventral view.Scale bars = 5 mm.	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C1303187291285FEB60C9AFBF9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802159/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802159	Figure 32. Oliverius jordanensis Soares & Soares,1945, ♂ (MNRJ 29845). A, ocularium, frontal view. B, habitus, dorsal view. C, same, lateral view. D, right femur IV, dorsal view.E, right femur–tibia IV, prolateral view.F, right femur IV, ventral view.G, right femur–tibia IV, retrolateral view. ♀ (same voucher). H, ocularium,frontal view. I, posterior margin of dorsal scutum and free tergites, dorsal view. J, right lateral margin of abdominal scutum and coxa IV, dorsal view.Scale bars:1 mm (A, H–J), 5 mm (B–G).	Figure 32. Oliverius jordanensis Soares & Soares,1945, ♂ (MNRJ 29845). A, ocularium, frontal view. B, habitus, dorsal view. C, same, lateral view. D, right femur IV, dorsal view.E, right femur–tibia IV, prolateral view.F, right femur IV, ventral view.G, right femur–tibia IV, retrolateral view. ♀ (same voucher). H, ocularium,frontal view. I, posterior margin of dorsal scutum and free tergites, dorsal view. J, right lateral margin of abdominal scutum and coxa IV, dorsal view.Scale bars:1 mm (A, H–J), 5 mm (B–G).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C1303187291285FEB60C9AFBF9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802144/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802144	Figure 29. Southeastern Brazil,showing distribution of Oliverius jordanensis Soares & Soares, 1945. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al.2022): Atlantic province (in dark green) and Paraná Forest province (in medium green).	Figure 29. Southeastern Brazil,showing distribution of Oliverius jordanensis Soares & Soares, 1945. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al.2022): Atlantic province (in dark green) and Paraná Forest province (in medium green).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C130368728165FFBA10BFCFA1A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802166/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802166	Figure 35. Pachylobos iratiensis, ♂ holotype (MNRJ 363). A, habitus, dorsal view. B, same, lateral view.C, same, ventral view. ♀ paratype (same voucher).D, habitus, dorsal view. E, same, lateral view. F, same, ventral view.Scale bars = 5 mm.	Figure 35. Pachylobos iratiensis, ♂ holotype (MNRJ 363). A, habitus, dorsal view. B, same, lateral view.C, same, ventral view. ♀ paratype (same voucher).D, habitus, dorsal view. E, same, lateral view. F, same, ventral view.Scale bars = 5 mm.	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C130368728165FFBA10BFCFA1A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802168/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802168	Figure 36. Pachylobos iratiensis, ♂ holotype (MNRJ 363). A, ocularium,frontal view. B, habitus, dorsal view. C, armature of scutal area III, posterior view. D, habitus, lateral view.E, right trochanter–femur III, dorsal view.F, right trochanter–patella IV, dorsal view. G, same, prolateral view. H, right trochanter–tibia IV, ventral view.I, same, retrolateral view. J, right metatarsus–tarsus IV, retrolateral view. Scale bars: 1 mm (A, C, E), 3 mm (B, D, F–J).	Figure 36. Pachylobos iratiensis, ♂ holotype (MNRJ 363). A, ocularium,frontal view. B, habitus, dorsal view. C, armature of scutal area III, posterior view. D, habitus, lateral view.E, right trochanter–femur III, dorsal view.F, right trochanter–patella IV, dorsal view. G, same, prolateral view. H, right trochanter–tibia IV, ventral view.I, same, retrolateral view. J, right metatarsus–tarsus IV, retrolateral view. Scale bars: 1 mm (A, C, E), 3 mm (B, D, F–J).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C130368728165FFBA10BFCFA1A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802172/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802172	Figure 38. Pachylobos iratiensis, ♀ paratype (MNRJ 363). A, ocularium, frontal view.B, habitus, dorsal view. C, right trochanter–femur IV, dorsal view. Scale bars: 1 mm (A), 3 mm (B–C).	Figure 38. Pachylobos iratiensis, ♀ paratype (MNRJ 363). A, ocularium, frontal view.B, habitus, dorsal view. C, right trochanter–femur IV, dorsal view. Scale bars: 1 mm (A), 3 mm (B–C).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C130368728165FFBA10BFCFA1A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802164/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802164	Figure 34. South and southeastern Brazil, showing the distribution of Pachylobos Piza, 1940. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al. 2022): Atlantic province (in dark green), Araucaria Forest province (in light green) and Paraná Forest province (in medium green).	Figure 34. South and southeastern Brazil, showing the distribution of Pachylobos Piza, 1940. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al. 2022): Atlantic province (in dark green), Araucaria Forest province (in light green) and Paraná Forest province (in medium green).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C130378723134BFA770B3DFB5C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802166/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802166	Figure 35. Pachylobos iratiensis, ♂ holotype (MNRJ 363). A, habitus, dorsal view. B, same, lateral view.C, same, ventral view. ♀ paratype (same voucher).D, habitus, dorsal view. E, same, lateral view. F, same, ventral view.Scale bars = 5 mm.	Figure 35. Pachylobos iratiensis, ♂ holotype (MNRJ 363). A, habitus, dorsal view. B, same, lateral view.C, same, ventral view. ♀ paratype (same voucher).D, habitus, dorsal view. E, same, lateral view. F, same, ventral view.Scale bars = 5 mm.	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C130378723134BFA770B3DFB5C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802168/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802168	Figure 36. Pachylobos iratiensis, ♂ holotype (MNRJ 363). A, ocularium,frontal view. B, habitus, dorsal view. C, armature of scutal area III, posterior view. D, habitus, lateral view.E, right trochanter–femur III, dorsal view.F, right trochanter–patella IV, dorsal view. G, same, prolateral view. H, right trochanter–tibia IV, ventral view.I, same, retrolateral view. J, right metatarsus–tarsus IV, retrolateral view. Scale bars: 1 mm (A, C, E), 3 mm (B, D, F–J).	Figure 36. Pachylobos iratiensis, ♂ holotype (MNRJ 363). A, ocularium,frontal view. B, habitus, dorsal view. C, armature of scutal area III, posterior view. D, habitus, lateral view.E, right trochanter–femur III, dorsal view.F, right trochanter–patella IV, dorsal view. G, same, prolateral view. H, right trochanter–tibia IV, ventral view.I, same, retrolateral view. J, right metatarsus–tarsus IV, retrolateral view. Scale bars: 1 mm (A, C, E), 3 mm (B, D, F–J).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C130378723134BFA770B3DFB5C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802170/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802170	Figure 37. Pachylobos iratiensis, ♂ holotype (MNRJ 363), genitalia, distal part.A, dorsal view.B, lateral view.C, ventral view.D, stylus and ventral process, laterodorsal view.Scale bars = 100 μm.	Figure 37. Pachylobos iratiensis, ♂ holotype (MNRJ 363), genitalia, distal part.A, dorsal view.B, lateral view.C, ventral view.D, stylus and ventral process, laterodorsal view.Scale bars = 100 μm.	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C130378723134BFA770B3DFB5C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802172/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802172	Figure 38. Pachylobos iratiensis, ♀ paratype (MNRJ 363). A, ocularium, frontal view.B, habitus, dorsal view. C, right trochanter–femur IV, dorsal view. Scale bars: 1 mm (A), 3 mm (B–C).	Figure 38. Pachylobos iratiensis, ♀ paratype (MNRJ 363). A, ocularium, frontal view.B, habitus, dorsal view. C, right trochanter–femur IV, dorsal view. Scale bars: 1 mm (A), 3 mm (B–C).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C130378723134BFA770B3DFB5C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802164/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802164	Figure 34. South and southeastern Brazil, showing the distribution of Pachylobos Piza, 1940. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al. 2022): Atlantic province (in dark green), Araucaria Forest province (in light green) and Paraná Forest province (in medium green).	Figure 34. South and southeastern Brazil, showing the distribution of Pachylobos Piza, 1940. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al. 2022): Atlantic province (in dark green), Araucaria Forest province (in light green) and Paraná Forest province (in medium green).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C1303C872312BCFAC30A83F9CA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802164/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802164	Figure 34. South and southeastern Brazil, showing the distribution of Pachylobos Piza, 1940. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al. 2022): Atlantic province (in dark green), Araucaria Forest province (in light green) and Paraná Forest province (in medium green).	Figure 34. South and southeastern Brazil, showing the distribution of Pachylobos Piza, 1940. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al. 2022): Atlantic province (in dark green), Araucaria Forest province (in light green) and Paraná Forest province (in medium green).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
03A387C1303C872211C9F94209DEF9F3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14802164/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14802164	Figure 34. South and southeastern Brazil, showing the distribution of Pachylobos Piza, 1940. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al. 2022): Atlantic province (in dark green), Araucaria Forest province (in light green) and Paraná Forest province (in medium green).	Figure 34. South and southeastern Brazil, showing the distribution of Pachylobos Piza, 1940. Shaded areas in the background are Morrone’s regionalization of the Neotropics (‘provinces’; Morrone et al. 2022): Atlantic province (in dark green), Araucaria Forest province (in light green) and Paraná Forest province (in medium green).	2024-03-30	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho, Rafael N.;Kury, Adriano B.			
