taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
039387DAFF83787BFF7EFE38D3C1FBDB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/185192/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.185192	FIGURE 2. Comparison of diagnostic characters in Rhopalorhynchus sibogae and R. tenuissimum. A. Proboscis of juvenile of R. tenuissimum, QM S 910 (dash line shows where it is broken) in Staples (1982). B. Proboscis of juvenile of R. sibogae WAM 70 - 3942 in Child (1975). C. Proboscis of female R. sibogae AM P 72804 in this study. D. Proboscis of male R. sibogae AM P 72807 in this study. E. Palp of female R. sibogae AM P 72804. F. Palp of juvenile R. sibogae WAM 70 - 3942.	FIGURE 2. Comparison of diagnostic characters in Rhopalorhynchus sibogae and R. tenuissimum. A. Proboscis of juvenile of R. tenuissimum, QM S 910 (dash line shows where it is broken) in Staples (1982). B. Proboscis of juvenile of R. sibogae WAM 70 - 3942 in Child (1975). C. Proboscis of female R. sibogae AM P 72804 in this study. D. Proboscis of male R. sibogae AM P 72807 in this study. E. Palp of female R. sibogae AM P 72804. F. Palp of juvenile R. sibogae WAM 70 - 3942.	2009-12-31	Arango, Claudia P.		Zenodo	biologists	Arango, Claudia P.			
039387DAFF83787BFF7EFE38D3C1FBDB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/185197/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.185197	FIGURE 7. Tanystylum zuytdorpi n. sp., holotype. A. Dorsal view; scale = 0.5 mm. B. Lateral view. C. Third leg; scale bar = 1 mm. D. Distal leg segments. E. Proboscis. F. Oviger. Scale bars D and E = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 7. Tanystylum zuytdorpi n. sp., holotype. A. Dorsal view; scale = 0.5 mm. B. Lateral view. C. Third leg; scale bar = 1 mm. D. Distal leg segments. E. Proboscis. F. Oviger. Scale bars D and E = 0.1 mm.	2009-12-31	Arango, Claudia P.		Zenodo	biologists	Arango, Claudia P.			
039387DAFF83787DFF7EFB3DD1A7FE36.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/185192/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.185192	FIGURE 2. Comparison of diagnostic characters in Rhopalorhynchus sibogae and R. tenuissimum. A. Proboscis of juvenile of R. tenuissimum, QM S 910 (dash line shows where it is broken) in Staples (1982). B. Proboscis of juvenile of R. sibogae WAM 70 - 3942 in Child (1975). C. Proboscis of female R. sibogae AM P 72804 in this study. D. Proboscis of male R. sibogae AM P 72807 in this study. E. Palp of female R. sibogae AM P 72804. F. Palp of juvenile R. sibogae WAM 70 - 3942.	FIGURE 2. Comparison of diagnostic characters in Rhopalorhynchus sibogae and R. tenuissimum. A. Proboscis of juvenile of R. tenuissimum, QM S 910 (dash line shows where it is broken) in Staples (1982). B. Proboscis of juvenile of R. sibogae WAM 70 - 3942 in Child (1975). C. Proboscis of female R. sibogae AM P 72804 in this study. D. Proboscis of male R. sibogae AM P 72807 in this study. E. Palp of female R. sibogae AM P 72804. F. Palp of juvenile R. sibogae WAM 70 - 3942.	2009-12-31	Arango, Claudia P.		Zenodo	biologists	Arango, Claudia P.			
039387DAFF85787FFF7EFD60D6AAFC9E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/185193/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.185193	FIGURE 3. Hedgpethia calva n. sp., holotype female. A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view. C. Palp. D. Details of distal segments of third leg. E. Third leg. F. Oviger strigilis. G. Oviger. All scale bars = 1 mm except G = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 3. Hedgpethia calva n. sp., holotype female. A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view. C. Palp. D. Details of distal segments of third leg. E. Third leg. F. Oviger strigilis. G. Oviger. All scale bars = 1 mm except G = 0.1 mm.	2009-12-31	Arango, Claudia P.		Zenodo	biologists	Arango, Claudia P.			
039387DAFF85787FFF7EFD60D6AAFC9E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/185198/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.185198	FIGURE 8. A. Hedgpethia calva n. sp., dorsal view. B. Parapallene challengeri, female, laterodorsal view; right legs 2 – 4 missing. C. Paranymphon bifilarium n. sp., dorsal view. D. Tanystylum zuytdorpi n. sp, dorsal view, three legs missing.	FIGURE 8. A. Hedgpethia calva n. sp., dorsal view. B. Parapallene challengeri, female, laterodorsal view; right legs 2 – 4 missing. C. Paranymphon bifilarium n. sp., dorsal view. D. Tanystylum zuytdorpi n. sp, dorsal view, three legs missing.	2009-12-31	Arango, Claudia P.		Zenodo	biologists	Arango, Claudia P.			
039387DAFF86787EFF7EFB2FD626F816.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/185198/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.185198	FIGURE 8. A. Hedgpethia calva n. sp., dorsal view. B. Parapallene challengeri, female, laterodorsal view; right legs 2 – 4 missing. C. Paranymphon bifilarium n. sp., dorsal view. D. Tanystylum zuytdorpi n. sp, dorsal view, three legs missing.	FIGURE 8. A. Hedgpethia calva n. sp., dorsal view. B. Parapallene challengeri, female, laterodorsal view; right legs 2 – 4 missing. C. Paranymphon bifilarium n. sp., dorsal view. D. Tanystylum zuytdorpi n. sp, dorsal view, three legs missing.	2009-12-31	Arango, Claudia P.		Zenodo	biologists	Arango, Claudia P.			
039387DAFF897871FF7EFCDFD117FAA6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/185192/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.185192	FIGURE 2. Comparison of diagnostic characters in Rhopalorhynchus sibogae and R. tenuissimum. A. Proboscis of juvenile of R. tenuissimum, QM S 910 (dash line shows where it is broken) in Staples (1982). B. Proboscis of juvenile of R. sibogae WAM 70 - 3942 in Child (1975). C. Proboscis of female R. sibogae AM P 72804 in this study. D. Proboscis of male R. sibogae AM P 72807 in this study. E. Palp of female R. sibogae AM P 72804. F. Palp of juvenile R. sibogae WAM 70 - 3942.	FIGURE 2. Comparison of diagnostic characters in Rhopalorhynchus sibogae and R. tenuissimum. A. Proboscis of juvenile of R. tenuissimum, QM S 910 (dash line shows where it is broken) in Staples (1982). B. Proboscis of juvenile of R. sibogae WAM 70 - 3942 in Child (1975). C. Proboscis of female R. sibogae AM P 72804 in this study. D. Proboscis of male R. sibogae AM P 72807 in this study. E. Palp of female R. sibogae AM P 72804. F. Palp of juvenile R. sibogae WAM 70 - 3942.	2009-12-31	Arango, Claudia P.		Zenodo	biologists	Arango, Claudia P.			
039387DAFF897873FF7EFA45D776F95E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/185194/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.185194	FIGURE 4. Pseudopallene difficile n. sp., holotype male. A. Frontal view of chelifores, proboscis and anterior of cephalon and ocular tubercle. B. Lateral view. C. Dorsal view. D. Oviger segments 3 – 10. E. Third leg. Scale bars = 1 mm.	FIGURE 4. Pseudopallene difficile n. sp., holotype male. A. Frontal view of chelifores, proboscis and anterior of cephalon and ocular tubercle. B. Lateral view. C. Dorsal view. D. Oviger segments 3 – 10. E. Third leg. Scale bars = 1 mm.	2009-12-31	Arango, Claudia P.		Zenodo	biologists	Arango, Claudia P.			
039387DAFF897873FF7EFA45D776F95E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/185195/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.185195	FIGURE 5. Pseudopallene difficile n. sp. A. Frontal view of chelifores, eggs attached to ovigers seen below. B. Tarsus, propodus and claw. C. Strigilis, segments 7 to 10 of the oviger with compound spines and denticulate main claw distally. Scale bars = 125 μm.	FIGURE 5. Pseudopallene difficile n. sp. A. Frontal view of chelifores, eggs attached to ovigers seen below. B. Tarsus, propodus and claw. C. Strigilis, segments 7 to 10 of the oviger with compound spines and denticulate main claw distally. Scale bars = 125 μm.	2009-12-31	Arango, Claudia P.		Zenodo	biologists	Arango, Claudia P.			
039387DAFF8D7877FF7EFBA7D65CFC16.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/185196/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.185196	FIGURE 6. Paranymphon bifilarium n. sp.. holotype male. A. Dorsal view; scale = 1 mm. B. Third leg; scale = 1 mm. C. Distal segments of third leg; scale = 0.1 mm. D. Ventral view of the femur with cement gland openings; scale = 1 mm. E. Oviger; scale = 0.5 mm. F. Strigilis. G. Palp. H. Frontal view of cephalon, ocular tubercle and chelifores. I. Details of chela. Scale bars G – I = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 6. Paranymphon bifilarium n. sp.. holotype male. A. Dorsal view; scale = 1 mm. B. Third leg; scale = 1 mm. C. Distal segments of third leg; scale = 0.1 mm. D. Ventral view of the femur with cement gland openings; scale = 1 mm. E. Oviger; scale = 0.5 mm. F. Strigilis. G. Palp. H. Frontal view of cephalon, ocular tubercle and chelifores. I. Details of chela. Scale bars G – I = 0.1 mm.	2009-12-31	Arango, Claudia P.		Zenodo	biologists	Arango, Claudia P.			
039387DAFF8D7877FF7EFBA7D65CFC16.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/185198/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.185198	FIGURE 8. A. Hedgpethia calva n. sp., dorsal view. B. Parapallene challengeri, female, laterodorsal view; right legs 2 – 4 missing. C. Paranymphon bifilarium n. sp., dorsal view. D. Tanystylum zuytdorpi n. sp, dorsal view, three legs missing.	FIGURE 8. A. Hedgpethia calva n. sp., dorsal view. B. Parapallene challengeri, female, laterodorsal view; right legs 2 – 4 missing. C. Paranymphon bifilarium n. sp., dorsal view. D. Tanystylum zuytdorpi n. sp, dorsal view, three legs missing.	2009-12-31	Arango, Claudia P.		Zenodo	biologists	Arango, Claudia P.			
039387DAFF917868FF7EFA4CD6F9FB06.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/185197/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.185197	FIGURE 7. Tanystylum zuytdorpi n. sp., holotype. A. Dorsal view; scale = 0.5 mm. B. Lateral view. C. Third leg; scale bar = 1 mm. D. Distal leg segments. E. Proboscis. F. Oviger. Scale bars D and E = 0.1 mm.	FIGURE 7. Tanystylum zuytdorpi n. sp., holotype. A. Dorsal view; scale = 0.5 mm. B. Lateral view. C. Third leg; scale bar = 1 mm. D. Distal leg segments. E. Proboscis. F. Oviger. Scale bars D and E = 0.1 mm.	2009-12-31	Arango, Claudia P.		Zenodo	biologists	Arango, Claudia P.			
039387DAFF917868FF7EFA4CD6F9FB06.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/185198/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.185198	FIGURE 8. A. Hedgpethia calva n. sp., dorsal view. B. Parapallene challengeri, female, laterodorsal view; right legs 2 – 4 missing. C. Paranymphon bifilarium n. sp., dorsal view. D. Tanystylum zuytdorpi n. sp, dorsal view, three legs missing.	FIGURE 8. A. Hedgpethia calva n. sp., dorsal view. B. Parapallene challengeri, female, laterodorsal view; right legs 2 – 4 missing. C. Paranymphon bifilarium n. sp., dorsal view. D. Tanystylum zuytdorpi n. sp, dorsal view, three legs missing.	2009-12-31	Arango, Claudia P.		Zenodo	biologists	Arango, Claudia P.			
