identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
038F8782FFCAFFB5FF2E0E96AF9139BF.text	038F8782FFCAFFB5FF2E0E96AF9139BF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Macropsis milkoi Tishetshkin	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Macropsis milkoi Tishetshkin sp. n.</p>
            <p>Figs. 1–37</p>
            <p> Material examined. Holotype, ♂, Kyrgyzstan, Alay Mtn. Range, Kurshab River 10 km North of Gul’cha, from  Salix alba, D. Tishechkin , 5. VII. 2014, calling signals recorded on disk at 26–29o C; paratypes: same locality, date and host plant, 9 ♂, 20 ♀, calling signals of 5 ♂ recorded on disk at 26–29o C; Kyrgyzstan, Turkestan Mtn. Range, Lyaylyak River, environs of Katran Village, from  S. alba, D. Tishechkin , 12. VII. 2014, 5 ♂, 2 ♀, calling signals of 3 ♂ recorded on disk at 31o C; Kyrgyzstan, Eastern slope of Ferghana Mtn. Range, Urumbash River ca. 15 km South-West from Kazarman Town, from  S. alba, D. Tishechkin , 17. VII. 2014, 5 ♂, calling signals of 3 ♂ recorded on disk at 29o C; Kyrgyzstan, Chatkal Mtn. Range, Ala-Buka River, environs of Ala-Buka Village, from  S. alba, D. Tishechkin , 20. VIII. 2011, 1 ♂, calling signals recorded on disk at 22–23o C (ZMMU); Tajikistan, environs of Ramit, Kafiringan River, M. Volkovich, 24. VI. 1975, 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Tajikistan, the gorge 4–5 km South-West of Ramit, M. Loginova, L. Danilovich, VI. 1975, 12 ♂, 5 ♀; Tajikistan, 6 km South-West of Ramit, right bank of Kafiringan River, M. Loginova, VI. 1975, 8 ♂, 6 ♀ (ZIN). </p>
            <p>Description. Body bright green, forewings transparent or weakly infumose, darkest in apical part, in male darker than in female.</p>
            <p>Abdominal apodemes of 2nd tergite in male more or less rounded, slightly bent inwards and separated by round notch (Figs. 1–4). Sternal apodemes rather long, strongly bent dorsally, with expanded tips usually overlapping with each other (Figs. 5–9).</p>
            <p>Penis in side view as a rule comparatively wide, with only slight if any extension at bend (Figs. 10–13). Pygofer processes with tips slightly bent forward (Figs. 14–16). Styles of typical shape (Figs. 17–19). 2nd valvulae of ovipositor with 2–4 preapical teeth each (Figs. 20–22).</p>
            <p>Body length (including tegmina): ♂, 3.4–3.8 mm; ♀, 4.2–4.6 mm.</p>
            <p> Diagnosis. Belongs to the group of willow-dwelling uniformly green cryptic species. Very similar to  M. iliensis Mityaev, 1971 , but can be distinguished from latter by the more strongly convergent sternal apodemes with overlapping tips (separated by narrow gap or only touching each other in  M. iliensis , Figs. 226-229), smaller size (♂, 3.8–4.3 mm, ♀, 4.4–5.0 mm in  M. iliensis ), and brighter coloration. Differs from all other Central Asian members of this group by 2nd sternal apodemes with tips overlapping or at least touching each other. Different from all green willow-dwelling  Macropsis species from Russia, Kazakhstan and Central Asia in the temporal pattern of calling signals. </p>
            <p> Host.  Salix alba (section  Salix ). </p>
            <p>Calling signal. Signal consists of prolonged phrases lasting up to 1–2 min each (Figs. 23–30). Each phrase includes two parts. The first part consists of a succession of syllables following against a background of constant low-amplitude vibrations (Figs. 25, 28, 32–35, first halves of oscillograms, and Fig. 31). The second part is a highamplitude trill sounding like a monotonous buzz (Figs. 25, 28, 32–35, second halves of oscillograms, and Fig. 37). Occasionally the second part is divided by gaps into several discrete fragments (Figs. 24, 26, 30). Often the first part is more or less reduced (Figs. 27, 29).</p>
            <p>Distribution. Chatkal, Ferghana, Alay, Turkestan and Hissar Mtn. Ranges.</p>
            <p> FIGURES 1–22.  Macropsis milkoi sp. n. 1–4―male abdominal apodemes of the 2nd tergite; 5–9―the 2nd sternite; 10– 13―penis, lateral view; 14–16―pygofer process; 17–19―end of style; 20–22―2 nd valvulae of ovipositor. </p>
            <p>Etymology. This species is named after Dmitri Milko (Institute of Biology and Pedology, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan) for his invaluable help during our fieldwork in Kyrgyzstan.</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F8782FFCAFFB5FF2E0E96AF9139BF	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Tishechkin, Dmitri Yu.	Tishechkin, Dmitri Yu. (2015): Taxonomic study of Central Asian species of the genus Macropsis Lewis, 1836 (Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Cicadellidae: Macropsinae). III: Descriptions of two new willow-dwelling species, new synonym, annotated check-list, and key to species. Zootaxa 3985 (1): 31-52, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3985.1.2
038F8782FFCFFFB1FF2E0C8FAE973C53.text	038F8782FFCFFFB1FF2E0C8FAE973C53.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Macropsis anufrievi Tishetshkin	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Macropsis anufrievi Tishetshkin sp. n.</p>
            <p>Figs. 38–61</p>
            <p>Material examined. Holotype, ♂, Tajikistan, Hissar Mtn. Range, left bank of Sardai-Miyen River 2 km upstream from Ramit Village, 6. VIII. 1991, G.A. Anufriev (ZMMU); paratypes: same locality and date, 3 ♂, 4 ♀ (ZMMU), 3 ♂, 3 ♀ (ZIN), 2 ♂, 7 ♀ (coll. Anufriev); Tajikistan, Hissar Mtn. Range, Sardai-Miyen River in the environs of Ramit Village, 4. VIII. 1991, from narrow-leaved willow, G.A. Anufriev, 4 ♂, 2 ♀, 1 nymph (ZMMU), 4 ♂, 8 ♀, 1 nymph (ZIN), 6 ♂, 3 ♀, 1 nymph (coll. Anufriev); Tajikistan, the southern end of Darvaz Mtn. Range, Dashtidzhum Nature Reserve, Khodzhamard River 4–5 km downstream from Kavok Village, 18. VIII. 1991, G.A. Anufriev, 2 ♂, 4 ♀ (ZMMU), 3 ♀ (ZIN).</p>
            <p> FIGURES 38–61.  Macropsis anufrievi sp. n. 38–42―male abdominal apodemes of the 2nd tergite; 43–47―the 2nd sternite; 48– 52―penis, lateral view; 53–54―pygofer process; 55–59―end of style; 60–61―2nd valvulae of ovipositor. </p>
            <p> FIGURES 62–88.  Macropsis elaeagni Em. (62–79): 62―penis, lateral view (  M. elaeagni , after Dubovskiy, 1966); 63―end of style (  M. elaeagni , after Dubovskiy, 1966); 64―penis, lateral view (  M. cyanescens , after Dubovskiy, 1966); 65―end of style (  M. cyanescens , after Dubovskiy, 1966); 66―male 2nd abdominal apodemes; 67–71―penis, lateral view (males from the same sample, Kara-Bulak East of Isfana, South Kyrgyzstan); 72–75―end of style (males from the same sample, Kara-Bulak East of Isfana); 76–77―penis and the end of style of the same male (Batken, South Kyrgyzstan); 78–79―end of style (males from the same sample, Ferghana Mtn. Range, North-East of Bazar-Korgon, Kyrgyzstan).  Macropsis elaeagnicola Dub. (80–88): 80– 82―male abdominal apodemes of the 2nd tergite; 83–84―the 2nd sternite; 85–86―penis, lateral view; 87–88―end of style. </p>
            <p>Description. Body bright green, forewings transparent with green veins, in male dark abdominal terga visible through forewings.</p>
            <p>Abdominal apodemes of 2nd tergite in male comparatively narrow, slightly bent inwards and separated by broad round notch (Figs. 38–42). Sternal apodemes bent ventrally, strongly convergent, with narrow or only slightly expanded tips, separated by small round notch (Figs. 43–47).</p>
            <p>Penis in side view wide, with distinct extension at bend (Figs. 48–52). Pygofer processes with tips slightly bent forward (Figs. 53–54). Styles of typical shape (Figs. 55–59). 2nd valvulae of ovipositor with 2–4 preapical teeth each (Figs. 60–61).</p>
            <p>Body length (including tegmina): ♂, 3.5–3.9 mm; ♀, 4.1–4.7 mm.</p>
            <p>Nymph bright green, densely pubescent with short white setae, abdominal crest low, almost even.</p>
            <p>Diagnosis. Belongs to the group of willow-dwelling uniformly green cryptic species. Differs from all other species from this group by the strongly ventrally bent and convergent sternal apodemes separated by a small round notch.</p>
            <p> Host.  Salix sp. (“narrow-leaved willow” according to the labels under the part of type series). </p>
            <p>Calling signal. Unknown.</p>
            <p>Distribution. Tajikistan: Hissar and Darvaz Mtn. Ranges.</p>
            <p> Etymology. This species is named after Prof. Georgiy Anufriev, famous for his excellent contribution to the systematics of the Palaearctic  Auchenorrhyncha . </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F8782FFCFFFB1FF2E0C8FAE973C53	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Tishechkin, Dmitri Yu.	Tishechkin, Dmitri Yu. (2015): Taxonomic study of Central Asian species of the genus Macropsis Lewis, 1836 (Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Cicadellidae: Macropsinae). III: Descriptions of two new willow-dwelling species, new synonym, annotated check-list, and key to species. Zootaxa 3985 (1): 31-52, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3985.1.2
038F8782FFCDFFBFFF2E0EB3A8FC3C9B.text	038F8782FFCDFFBFFF2E0EB3A8FC3C9B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Macropsis elaeagni Emelyanov 1964	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Macropsis elaeagni Emelyanov, 1964</p>
            <p>Figs. 66–79, 89–104</p>
            <p> Macropsis cyanescens Dubovskiy, 1966: 99 ,  syn. n.</p>
            <p> Description. Body pale greenish, of exactly same color as young twigs and leaf underside of host, oleaster (  Elaeagnus spp.) (Fig. 126). </p>
            <p>Abdominal apodemes of 2nd tergite in male wide, with subquadrate lobes, separated by narrow notch, sometimes with tips touching each other. Sternal apodemes of similar shape, but slightly narrower and separated by oval notch (Fig. 66).</p>
            <p>Pygofer processes of typical shape, almost straight or slightly sinuate. Penis in side view narrow, evenly curved, proximal part (before bend) same length or somewhat shorter than distal part (Figs. 67–71, 76). Styles with short and slightly blunted tips (Figs. 72–75, 77–79). 2nd valvulae of ovipositor with 3–5 preapical teeth.</p>
            <p>Body length (including tegmina): ♂, 3.3–3.7 mm; ♀, 3.9–4.3 mm.</p>
            <p> Diagnosis. Differs from poplar- and willow-feeding  Macropsis species by narrow penis in side view. Differs from other Palaearctic  Macropsis species by pale greenish coloration and unmarked head, pro- and mesonotum. Superficially similar to  M. elaeagnicola Dubovskiy, 1966 , but differs from it by short and wide 2nd abdominal apodemes (longer and narrower in  M. elaeagnicola , Figs. 80–84), blunted style tips (elongated and pointed in  M. elaeagnicola , Figs. 87–88), larger size (♂, 3.0– 3.3 mm; ♀, 3.6–3.9 mm in  M. elaeagnicola ), and calling signal pattern. </p>
            <p> Host.  Elaeagnus spp. </p>
            <p> Calling signal. Signal is a succession of repeated syllables lasting for about 1- 1.5 s each (Figs. 89–94). Typically, each syllable includes a train of pulses followed by several discrete ones (Figs. 95–104). Both shape and duration of syllables can vary even within the same signal (Figs. 90, 96–97) or in the males from the same sample (Figs. 91, 98–100). Signals of males resembling  M. cyanescens in genitalia traits do not differ from the signals of typical  M. elaeagni . </p>
            <p> Material examined. Kazakhstan, environs of Almaty, foothills of Zailiyskiy Alatau Mtn. Ridge, from  Elaeagnus angustifolia , 2. VII. 1994, calling signals of 3 ♂ recorded on disk at 31o C (Figs. 90, 96–97); Kyrgyzstan, foothills of Chatkal Mtn. Range, 30 km North-East of Kerben Town, from  Elaeagnus sp., 9. VII. 2009, calling signals of 2 ♂ recorded on disk at 21–22o C (Figs. 91, 98–100); Kyrgyzstan, foothills of Ferghana Mtn. Range, ca. 15 km North-East of Bazar-Korgon Town, from  Elaeagnus sp., 11. VII. 2009, calling signals of 3 ♂ recorded on disk at 20–22o C (Figs. 92, 101–102); South-Western Kyrgyzstan, Kara-Bulak Village, 20 km East of Isfana Town, from  Elaeagnus sp., 13. VII. 2014, calling signals of 2 ♂ recorded on disk at 30o C (Figs. 89, 95). </p>
            <p>Calling signals of males from Moscow (Figs. 94, 104), Crimea (Kerch Peninsula), Caucasian Riviera (12 km South of Anapa), Chechnya (env. Grozny), and South Urals (Guberlya Mts. 25 km West of Orsk, Figs. 93, 103) and specimens from about 40 localities in Ukraine, Lower Volga Region, West Siberia (Kulunda Plain), North Caucasus, Transcaucasia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan (including several localities on South-Western border of Ferghana Valley), Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Tajikistan were also studied.</p>
            <p>Distribution. Natural range of this species apparently includes Kazakhstan and Central Asia. Was introduced to Europe with its host plant.</p>
            <p> Remarks.  M. cyanescens was described from Ferghana Valley and foothills in its South-Western part. According to the original description (Dubovskiy, 1966), it differs from closely related  M. elaeagni by longer penis with elongate apex, styles expanded in preapical part, and rather long pygofer processes (Figs. 62–63,  M. elaeagni sensu Dubovskiy, 1966 and 64–65,  M. cyanescens sensu Dubovskiy, 1966 ). We failed to find differences in pygofer process length between samples of specimens from different localities in Central Asia. Males with a more or less expanded preapical part of the styles were found almost in every population along with typical  M. elaeagni (e.g. Figs. 72–75, males from Kara-Bulak, South Kyrgyzstan or 78–79, males from Ferghana Mtn. Range, 15 km North- East of Bazar-Korgon). Males with different penis shape also can be found in every sufficiently large sample from Southern Kyrgyzstan (Figs. 67–71). In addition, occasionally the combination of expanded styles (as in  M. cyanescens ) and rather short penis (as in  M. elaeagni sensu Dubovskiy, 1966 ) can be found in the same male (Figs. 76–77). 2nd abdominal apodemes in all males have the shape characteristic of  M. elaeagni (Fig. 66) irrespective of genitalia shape. Also, in calling signal pattern all males investigated fall into  M. elaeagni . On this basis we establish the synonymy of  M. cyanescens Dubovskiy, 1966 under  M. elaeagni Emelyanov, 1964 . </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F8782FFCDFFBFFF2E0EB3A8FC3C9B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Tishechkin, Dmitri Yu.	Tishechkin, Dmitri Yu. (2015): Taxonomic study of Central Asian species of the genus Macropsis Lewis, 1836 (Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Cicadellidae: Macropsinae). III: Descriptions of two new willow-dwelling species, new synonym, annotated check-list, and key to species. Zootaxa 3985 (1): 31-52, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3985.1.2
038F8782FFC3FFBDFF2E0EE6A9063E9D.text	038F8782FFC3FFBDFF2E0EE6A9063E9D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Macropsis	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Key to species of  Macropsis of Central Asia (males) </p>
            <p> Species identification in the genus  Macropsis is very difficult because of the uniform morphology of male genitalia. Some species differ in the shape of 2nd abdominal apodemes, but are otherwise similar in appearance, others differ in color but are similar in the shape of the apodemes. European species feeding on  Salicaceae differ in the number of preapical teeth on the 2nd valvulae of the ovipositor (Tishechkin, 2002a), but Central Asian species are indistinguishable in this trait. For this reason in species dwelling on  Salicaceae with the exception of  M. viridobrunnea Dlab. identification of females not associated with males, as a rule, is impossible. Females are also indistinguishable in the two species dwelling on oleaster. Females from other species groups in most cases can be identified by appearance using color photographs (Figs. 105–148). In most species, females are similar to males, but have somewhat lighter coloration. If females are strongly different from males, this is noted in the key. </p>
            <p> Both 2nd abdominal apodemes and coloration are quite variable in  Macropsis . For this reason investigation of several specimens is advisable for reliable identification. Data on host associations are also an aid in species diagnostics. </p>
            <p> 1. 2nd tergal apodemes elongated, with more or less expanded tips, separated by large round notch (Figs. 149–150). Body and forewings brown (Fig. 105). ♂, 3.6–3.9 mm, ♀, 4.2–4.5 mm. On  Ulmus .............................  M. illota (Horv.) . </p>
            <p>- Combination of characters is different...................................................................... 2</p>
            <p> 2. 2nd tergal apodemes wide, rounded, separated by small round notch (Fig. 154). Pale yellowish with black pattern, forewings semi-transparent with black veins (Figs. 106–107). ♂, 3.2–3.4 mm, ♀, 3.4–3.9 mm. On  Spiraea .........  M. sibirica Kusn.</p>
            <p>- Combination of characters is different...................................................................... 3</p>
            <p>3. Penis shaft in side view broad, usually bent at obtuse angle (Figs. 183–184, 192–193, 204–205, 222–223, 230–231, 238–239, 245–246, 252–253, 259–260)............................................................................. 4</p>
            <p>- Penis shaft in side view narrow, if more or less broad, bent at right angle (Figs. 67–71, 76, 85–86, 263–264, 276–277, 289, 292, 295, 297, 299, 302)................................................................................... 17</p>
            <p> 4. 2nd tergal apodemes elongate, broad, broadly separated by an oval or U-shaped notch (Figs. 157–160). Body pale green or grayish green, forewings infumose or transparent (Figs. 108–110). ♂, 4.0– 4.4 mm, ♀, 4.7–5.2 mm. On  Populus alba ..................................................................................................  M. vicina (Horv.)</p>
            <p>- 2nd tergal apodemes of another shape....................................................................... 5</p>
            <p> 5. 2nd tergal apodemes narrow, separated by very broad rounded notch (Figs. 165–168), sternal apodemes usually with expanded bases and wide tips, strongly convergent or even somewhat overlapping with each other (Figs. 169–173). Frontal spot absent. Usually green, occasionally brown or reddish-brown (Figs. 111–115). ♂, 4.4–4.8 mm, ♀, 5.0– 5.6 mm. On black poplars.........................................................................................  M. validiuscula Dub.</p>
            <p>- 2nd tergal apodemes broad, separated by more narrow notch (Figs. 174–178, 185–186, 194–195, 198–199, 206–207, 216–217, 224–225, 232–233, 240–241, 247–248, 254–255), sternal apodemes usually more narrow. If tergal apodemes more or less narrow (Figs. 174–175, 211–213), body size either smaller (♂ &lt;4.0 mm, ♀ &lt;5.0 mm) or head with frontal spot............. 6</p>
            <p>6. Male brown or yellowish, usually with dark pattern on pro- and mesonotum (Figs. 116–117, 119)...................... 7</p>
            <p>- Male green, sometimes forewings more or less infumose (Fig. 123) or even almost entirely black (Fig. 124).............. 9</p>
            <p>7. Male yellowish, with dense dark pattern on pro- and mesonotum (Fig. 116), 2nd tergal apodemes separated by rather wide gap</p>
            <p> (Figs. 174–178). Female yellowish with dark pattern, reddish brown or green, frontal spot usually present. ♂, 4.5–4.7 mm, ♀, 5.1–5.4 mm. On introduced Siberian and Far-Eastern poplar species.................................  M. suspecta Tish. - Male brown with dark pattern (Figs. 117, 119), 2nd tergal apodemes separated by rather narrow gap (Figs. 185–186, 194–195)....................................................................................................8 </p>
            <p> 8. Grayish brown or brown, usually with dark pattern on face (Fig. 117). 2nd sternal apodemes usually elongated, with more or less straight inner margins (Figs. 196–197). Female similar to male or reddish brown, black pattern less developed or entirely absent (Fig. 118). ♂, 3.6–4.2 mm, ♀, 4.0– 4.4 mm. On  Salix rosmarinifolia ...........................  M. impura (Boh.) . </p>
            <p> - Reddish brown to brown, without dark pattern on face (Fig. 119). 2nd sternal apodemes wide triangular, usually short, with rounded projections on inner margins (Figs. 187-191). Female similar to male or green with various dark pattern, crown, pro-, mesonotum, and mesonotal margins of forewings usually black, brown or pale yellowish (Figs. 120–122). ♂, 4.0– 4.5 mm, ♀, 4.6–5.1 mm. On different willow species.................................................  M. viridobrunnea Dlab.</p>
            <p> 9. 2nd sternal apodemes with distinct projections at base on inner margins (Figs. 200-203). Penis in side view comparatively short and broad (Figs. 204–205). Forewings transparent (Fig. 123) or infumose, sometimes almost black (Fig. 124). Female similar to male, but with forewings less infumose or transparent (Fig. 125). ♂, 3.4–3.9 mm, ♀, 4.1–4.5 mm. On  S. niedzwieckii ...........................................................................................  M. abdullaevi Dub.</p>
            <p>- 2nd sternal apodemes without projections at base on inner margins, if very rarely, with projections (Fig. 249), penis in side view comparatively narrow (Figs. 252–253). Forewings never black, sometimes only infumose in distal part................. 10</p>
            <p>10. 2nd sternal apodemes with tips separated by gap or, very rarely, touching each other (Figs. 214–215, 218–221, 226–229, 234– 237, 242–244, 249–251, 256–258)........................................................................ 11</p>
            <p> - 2nd sternal apodemes with tips overlapping or, very rarely, only touching each other (Figs. 208-210). ♂, 3.4–3.8 mm; ♀, 4.2– 4.6 mm. On  S. alba ........................................................................  M. milkoi sp. n.</p>
            <p> 11. 2nd sternal apodemes strongly bent ventrally, convergent, separated by small round notch (Figs. 214–215). 2nd tergal apodemes comparatively narrow and elongated, slightly bent inwards (Figs. 211–213). ♂, 3.5–3.9 mm; ♀, 4.1–4.7 mm. On  Salix sp..........................................................................................  M. anufrievi sp. n.</p>
            <p>- 2nd sternal apodemes directed more or less dorsally, separated by wider notch (Figs. 218–221, 226–229, 234–237, 242–244, 249–251, 256–258). 2nd tergal apodemes usually wider and shorter (Figs. 216–217, 224–225, 232–233, 240–241, 247–248, 254–255)............................................................................................ 12</p>
            <p>12. 2nd sternal apodemes with tips separated by narrow gap, sometimes almost touching each other (Figs. 218–221, 226–229).. 13</p>
            <p>- 2nd sternal apodemes usually with tips separated by wide gap (Figs. 234–237, 242–244, 249–251, 256–258), if very rarely, with tips almost touching each other (Fig. 251), penis in side view comparatively narrow (Fig. 252–258) and coloration bright green.............................................................................................. 14</p>
            <p> 13. 2nd sternal apodemes rather narrow (Figs. 216–217). Bright yellowish green. On  S. pycnostachya . ♂, 3.7–4.1 mm; ♀, 4.3–4.9 mm ....................................................................................  M. asiatica Dub.</p>
            <p> - 2nd sternal apodemes wider, especially at the base (Figs. 224–225). Paler, without yellowish tinge. ♂, 3.8–4.3 mm; ♀, 4.4–5.0 mm. On  S. turanica .........................................................................  M. iliensis Mit.</p>
            <p> 14. Penis stem in side view broadest in the middle (Figs. 238–239). ♂, 3.5–3.7 mm; ♀, 3.9–4.6 mm. On  S. niedzwieckii ..............................................................................................  M. ibragimovi Dub.</p>
            <p>- Penis stem in side view almost of same width at base as in middle (Figs. 245–246, 252–253, 259–260). ♂&gt; 3.8 mm; ♀&gt; 4.5 mm ................................................................................................ 15</p>
            <p> 15. 2nd tergal apodemes with well-defined incisions on the inner margins (Figs. 240–241), sternal apodemes with slightly expanded truncate lobes (Figs. 242–244). Bright green, male usually with black frontal spot. ♂, 3.9–4.3 mm; ♀, 4.5–4.9 mm. On  S. alba ........................................................................................  M. ocellata Prov.</p>
            <p>- 2nd tergal apodemes with concave inner margins, but without well-defined incisions (Figs. 247–248, 254–255), sternal apodemes usually with rounded lobes (Figs. 249–251, 256–258)................................................... 16</p>
            <p> 16. 2nd tergal apodemes shorter than width at base (Figs. 247–248). Sternal apodemes more or less triangular, separated by comparatively narrow notch (Figs. 249–251). Bright green, in male forewings usually more or less infumose. ♂, 3.8–4.3 mm; ♀, 4.6– 5.0 mm. On different willow species.......................................................  M. tarbagataica Mit.</p>
            <p> - 2nd tergal apodemes of the same width and length or slightly longer than width at base (Figs. 254–255). Sternal apodemes slen- der, almost parallel-sided or narrow triangular, separated by broad U-shaped notch (Figs. 256–258). ♂, 4.1–4.4 mm; ♀, 4.6–5.1 mm. On  S. alba ........................................................................  M. tienschanica Tish.</p>
            <p> 17. Both sexes pale greenish, unmarked (Fig. 126). On  Elaeagnus ................................................. 18 </p>
            <p>- Coloration different, if green, male always with dark pattern on face and pronotum................................. 19</p>
            <p> 18. 2nd tergal apodemes wide, of approximately same length as width at base, separated by narrow notch. Sternal apodemes wide, convergent, separated by round notch (Fig. 66). Styles with blunt tips (Figs. 72–75, 77–79). ♂, 3.3–3.7 mm; ♀, 3.9–4.3 mm .........................................................................................  M. elaeagni Em.</p>
            <p> - 2nd tergal apodemes elongate, strongly convergent, separated by oval notch, usually with more or less expanded tips almost touching each other (Figs. 80–82). Sternal apodemes slender, with parallel inner margins and slightly convergent tips, separated by broad rectangular notch (Figs. 83–84). Styles with elongated pointed tips (Figs. 87–88). ♂, 3.0– 3.3 mm; ♀, 3.6–3.9 mm ................................................................................  M. elaeagnicola Dub.</p>
            <p> 19. 2nd tergal apodemes situated close to each other, separated by narrow gap (Figs. 261–262, 275). On  Berberis ............. 20 </p>
            <p>- 2nd tergal apodemes separated by wide notch (Figs. 288, 290–291, 294, 296, 298, 300–301, 305)...................... 21</p>
            <p>20. Outer outline of distal part of penis in side view straight or somewhat sinuate (Figs. 263–264). Pygofer processes rather thick and straight (Figs. 265–267). Styles with short tips bent inwards (Figs. 268–270). ♂, 3.7–4.3 mm; ♀, 5.0– 5.4 mm.</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F8782FFC3FFBDFF2E0EE6A9063E9D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Tishechkin, Dmitri Yu.	Tishechkin, Dmitri Yu. (2015): Taxonomic study of Central Asian species of the genus Macropsis Lewis, 1836 (Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Cicadellidae: Macropsinae). III: Descriptions of two new willow-dwelling species, new synonym, annotated check-list, and key to species. Zootaxa 3985 (1): 31-52, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3985.1.2
