taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
038687E9FFDDFFC73F0BFF46FE75E4BF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13311270/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13311270	FIGURE 1. The phylogenetic placement of reference fossils (full red arrows) relative to modern groups for 1, Macropodoidea; 2, Monotremata; 3 Caviomorpha-Phiomorpha; and 4, Chiroptera. These clades are shaded grey and black circles identify the calibrated nodes. Relationships among modern taxa are taken from the DNA analysis of Meredith et al. (2011), although each is supported by a broad consensus of molecular phylogenetic studies. Dotted red arrows (1, 3, 4) indicate possible alternative placements for the reference fossil that if they can be confirmed, would offer (tighter) calibration of a slightly younger node.	FIGURE 1. The phylogenetic placement of reference fossils (full red arrows) relative to modern groups for 1, Macropodoidea; 2, Monotremata; 3 Caviomorpha-Phiomorpha; and 4, Chiroptera. These clades are shaded grey and black circles identify the calibrated nodes. Relationships among modern taxa are taken from the DNA analysis of Meredith et al. (2011), although each is supported by a broad consensus of molecular phylogenetic studies. Dotted red arrows (1, 3, 4) indicate possible alternative placements for the reference fossil that if they can be confirmed, would offer (tighter) calibration of a slightly younger node.	2015-02-28	Phillips, MJ		Zenodo	biologists	Phillips, MJ			
038687E9FFD3FFCA3DA5FE06FDF9E6E2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13311270/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13311270	FIGURE 1. The phylogenetic placement of reference fossils (full red arrows) relative to modern groups for 1, Macropodoidea; 2, Monotremata; 3 Caviomorpha-Phiomorpha; and 4, Chiroptera. These clades are shaded grey and black circles identify the calibrated nodes. Relationships among modern taxa are taken from the DNA analysis of Meredith et al. (2011), although each is supported by a broad consensus of molecular phylogenetic studies. Dotted red arrows (1, 3, 4) indicate possible alternative placements for the reference fossil that if they can be confirmed, would offer (tighter) calibration of a slightly younger node.	FIGURE 1. The phylogenetic placement of reference fossils (full red arrows) relative to modern groups for 1, Macropodoidea; 2, Monotremata; 3 Caviomorpha-Phiomorpha; and 4, Chiroptera. These clades are shaded grey and black circles identify the calibrated nodes. Relationships among modern taxa are taken from the DNA analysis of Meredith et al. (2011), although each is supported by a broad consensus of molecular phylogenetic studies. Dotted red arrows (1, 3, 4) indicate possible alternative placements for the reference fossil that if they can be confirmed, would offer (tighter) calibration of a slightly younger node.	2015-02-28	Phillips, MJ		Zenodo	biologists	Phillips, MJ			
