taxonID	type	description	language	source
03FC1945B25AFF9BECC2E93BFCC3FA66.taxon	description	Our results are in line with the suggestion that Tectarioideae sensu Holttum (1947) are polyphyletic. The placement of Cyclopeltis in subfamily Lomariopsidoideae (Smith et al. 2006, Schuettpelz & Pryer 2007) is supported by our analyses, as is the inclusion of Dryopsis and Ctenitis in Dryopteridoideae (Li & Lu 2006, Liu et al. 2007). Indeed, Dryopsis has already been merged with Dryopteris (Zhang 2012), although this may cause Dryopteris not to be monophyletic (Christenhusz & Chase 2014). Ctenitis (including Ataxipteris) forms a lineage with Pseudotectaria and both are deeply embedded in Dryopteridoideae, even though these three genera share morphological characteristics with Tectarioideae and were associated with it previously. Pleocnemia, which was placed in Tectariaceae by Smith et al. (2006) and Christenhusz et al. (2011), is here shown to belong to Dryopteridoideae, agreeing with other recent studies (e. g. Liu et al. 2014). With the exclusion of these genera, Tectarioideae are monophyletic and are composed of Arthropteris, Pteridrys, Triplophyllum, Hypoderris and Tectaria. We were not able to sample Aenigmopteris, so its placement remains uncertain.	en	Wang, Fa-Guo, Barratt, Sam, Falcón, Wilfredo, Fay, Michael F., Lehtonen, Samuli, Tuomisto, Hanna, Xing, Fu-Wu, Christenhusz, Maarten J. M. (2014): On the monophyly of subfamily Tectarioideae (Polypodiaceae) and the phylogenetic placement of some associated fern genera. Phytotaxa 164 (1): 1-16, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.164.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.164.1.1
03FC1945B257FF97ECC2EC01FC25FEE0.taxon	description	Our phylogenetic tree shows that the Tectaria clade is composed of three clades all with strong support and each with a different geographical distribution: one is Palaeotropical (Tectaria I), one is Neotropical (Tectaria II) and one is South-East Asian (Tectaria III). Tectaria clade III includes the peculiar genus Cionidium, an endemic to New Caledonia, which was segregated because of its extramarginal (stalked) sori and lanceolate, non-clathrate scales. Even though Bower (1928) placed Cionidium moorei in Deparia Hook. & Grev., it resembles Tectaria in most other characters, except the sori. Copeland (1947) therefore considered it most closely related to T. seemannii (E. Fourn.) Copeland (1929: 359), another New Caledonian species. Our phylogenetic analyses places Cionidium with reasonable support in a clade comprised of the South-East Asian species T. impressa (Fée) Holttum (1988: 483) and T. simonsii (Baker) Ching (1931: 32) and the more widespread T. devexa (Kunze) Copeland (1907: 415), which extends into Polynesia. The Neotropical clade Tectaria I includes T. trifoliata (L.) Cavanilles (1802: 249), which is the type species of the genus. We also included two samples of T. incisa and one of its synonyms, T. martinicensis (Spreng.) Copeland (1907: 410). This taxon is variable and taxonomically complex and probably includes more than one species. Indeed, the three specimens were not resolved together, indicating that this species is not monophyletic. A more detailed study of the T. incisa complex using morphological and molecular characters will be needed to tease this species complex apart and allow its biogeography to be discussed. Taxonomic study of this species complex is important because of its weedy and invasive nature and possibility of hybridisation with other taxa (Wagner et al. 1978, Gordon & Thomas 1997).	en	Wang, Fa-Guo, Barratt, Sam, Falcón, Wilfredo, Fay, Michael F., Lehtonen, Samuli, Tuomisto, Hanna, Xing, Fu-Wu, Christenhusz, Maarten J. M. (2014): On the monophyly of subfamily Tectarioideae (Polypodiaceae) and the phylogenetic placement of some associated fern genera. Phytotaxa 164 (1): 1-16, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.164.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.164.1.1
