identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03FE87B1F854697FFF3AFCFB5FEBFAD3.text	03FE87B1F854697FFF3AFCFB5FEBFAD3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Bothropolys Wood 1862	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Bothropolys Wood, 1862</p>
            <p> Bothropolys Wood, 1862: 15 ; Chamberlin, 1925: 387; Matic, 1974: 334; Jeekel, 1963: 195.  Bothropolys (Poropolys) Chamberlin, 1925: 389 ; synonymy by Eason, 1972: 142.  Lithobius (Polybothrus) Latzel, 1880: 35 ; synonymy by Crabill, 1955: 110. </p>
            <p> Polybothrus Latzel, 1880: 35 ; synonymy by Crabill, 1955: 110. </p>
            <p>Diagnosis: Body length usually exceeding 10 mm, antennae composed of 20+20 antennomeres or thereaout; ocelli usually in excess of 10 on each side; 5+5–11+11 blunt prosternal teeth; only few species without porodonts; posterior angles of TT 9, 11, 13 generally sharply triangular; numerous irregularly arranged pores on the coxae of last four pairs of legs; female gonopods with 1+1–5+5 spurs; male gonopods short and small, with several long setae, distally slightly sclerotised.</p>
            <p> Type species:  Bothropolys nobilis Wood, 1862 , by subsequent designation of Crabill, 1955 (Ent. News 66: 110) (a synonym of  Lithobius multidentatus Newport, 1844 ). </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE87B1F854697FFF3AFCFB5FEBFAD3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Ma, Hui-Qin;Song, Da-Xiang;Zhu, Ming-Sheng	Ma, Hui-Qin, Song, Da-Xiang, Zhu, Ming-Sheng (2008): A review of the Chinese species of Bothropolys Wood, 1862 (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae). Zootaxa 1786: 35-47, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.182487
03FE87B1F854697CFF3AFA445C8FFED6.text	03FE87B1F854697CFF3AFA445C8FFED6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Bothropolys crassidentatus Takakuwa & Takashima 1949	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Bothropolys crassidentatus Takakuwa &amp; Takashima, 1949</p>
            <p>Takakuwa &amp; Takashima, 1949: 59; Wang &amp; Mauriès, 1996: 91; Zapparoli, 2006.</p>
            <p>Diagnosis: Body length 10.5–20.0 mm, antennae composed of 20+20 antennomeres; 15–20 ocelli arranged in 4 rows on each side; Tömösváry’s organ rounded, moderately small, about equal to the adjoining ocelli; 7+7– 7+8 blunt prosternal teeth, usually 7+7; porodonts thick and strong, posterolateral to lateral tooth; posterior angles of TT 6 and 7 feebly triangular, posterior angles of TT 9, 11, 13 sharply triangular; pretarsus of all legs with claws; moderately long accessory claws on legs 1–13, no accessory claws on legs 14 and 15; coxal pores round or ovate, 11–34 irregularly arranged coxal pores; female gonopods with 2+2 bullet-shaped spurs and tridentate claws; male gonopods short and thick, only a half-ball protuberance, with 4–5 long setae, distally slightly sclerotised.</p>
            <p>Material examined. 1 Ψ, Suifenhe City, Heilongjiang Province, 44°24'N 131°12'E, 15 July 2003, leg. Feng Zhang. 1 ɗ, Qingliangdian Town, Wuyi County, Hengshui City, Hebei Province, 37°36'N 115°48'E, 5 May 2005, leg. Hui-Qin Ma. 1 Ψ, Kongdong Island, Yantai City, Shandong Province, 37°30'N 121°30'E, 6 July 2005, leg. Hui-Qin Ma.</p>
            <p>Distribution: China (Heilongjiang, Hebei, Shandong, Shaanxi).</p>
            <p>Remarks: Takakuwa and Takashima’s original description of this species based on a single female specimen from Shaanxi Province, though brief, is easily recognizable. Their record remains the only north Chinese record.</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE87B1F854697CFF3AFA445C8FFED6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Ma, Hui-Qin;Song, Da-Xiang;Zhu, Ming-Sheng	Ma, Hui-Qin, Song, Da-Xiang, Zhu, Ming-Sheng (2008): A review of the Chinese species of Bothropolys Wood, 1862 (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae). Zootaxa 1786: 35-47, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.182487
03FE87B1F857697DFF3AFE4E5EE1F828.text	03FE87B1F857697DFF3AFE4E5EE1F828.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Bothropolys curvatus Takakuwa, 1939 New Chinese	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Bothropolys curvatus Takakuwa, 1939 New Chinese records </p>
            <p>Takakuwa, 1939: 104, 109; 1940: 43.</p>
            <p>Diagnosis: Body length 18.6 mm, antennae composed of 22+18 antennomeres; 22+23 ocelli arranged in 4 rows on each side; Tömösváry’s organ rounded, small, moderately smaller than the adjoining ocelli; 8+9 blunt, triangular prosternal teeth, porodonts between the fourth and fifth outer teeth; posterior angles of T 4 feebly triangular, posterior angles of TT 6 and 7 moderately triangular, posterior angles of TT 9, 11 and 13 sharply triangular; pretarsus of all legs with claws; anterior and posterior accessory claws on claws of legs 1– 13; no accessory claws on legs 14 and 15; coxal pores round or ovate, 7–14 coxal pores irregularly arranged; male gonopods short and thick, only as digitiform protuberance, with 1 long seta, terminally slightly sclerotised.</p>
            <p>Description: Body length: 18.6 mm.</p>
            <p>Colour: basal antennal article lavender, succeeding antennomeres showing transition to darker colour, subterminal 2–3 antennomeres orange, terminal antennomere orange with purple hue; tergites pale brown, head shield and T 15 red brown, TT 1 and 14 darker, pleural region offwhite; sternites gray with lightly pale yellow; tip of maxillipeds black, other parts of maxillipeds, coxosternum and sternite 15 red-brown; all legs light gray with purple hue, femur, tibia, and basitarsus darker.</p>
            <p>Antennae composed of 22+18 antennomeres (Fig. 1); antennae as long as 3.7 times the width of head shield, usually extending back to the posterior part of T 4; basal antennomere as long as wide, the second moderately long, the third markedly longer than wide; succeeding antennomeres gradually shorter and thinner, terminal antennomere 2.6 times as long as wide; abundant setae on the antennal surface, but fewer setae on both ventral and outer sides of the basal articles, gradually increasing in density of setae to about the fifth antennomere, then more or less constant.</p>
            <p>Head shield smooth, transverse suture clear, pigment concentrated as close netlike veins, tiny setae scattered very sparsely over the surface; frontal marginal ridge with shallow anterior median furrow, short to moderately long setae scattered sparsely along the frontal marginal ridge of the head-shield; posterior margin of the head shield slightly concave.</p>
            <p>22+23 ocelli (Fig. 2), oval, comparatively small, arranged in 4 irregular rows; terminal ocellus comparatively larger, the other ocelli about equal in size, overhanging the anterior lateral margin of the head; ocelli gently bulging, domed, translucent, usually darkly pigmented basally, ocellar field slightly dark.</p>
            <p>Tömösváry’s organ (Fig. 2 -To) moderately small, ovate, slightly smaller than the adjoining ocelli, lying on the ventral margin of the head immediately proventral to the ocelli.</p>
            <p>Maxillipede coxosternite (Fig. 3) trapezoidal, medial part of the dental margin moderately arched, outboard as long as inboard, median notch moderately deep and shallow, U-shaped; dental margin without shoul- der, with 8+9 approximately triangular teeth, the most lateral moderately sharp (Fig. 4); porodonts slender and long, between the outer fourth and fifth teeth (Fig. 4); some scattered setae on ventral side of coxosternum, comparatively long and thick setae near the dental margin.</p>
            <p>Posterior margin of all tergites slightly hunched, posterolaterally narrower than anterolaterally, generally trapeziform; except for head shield and TT 1, 14 and 15, all tergites weakly wrinkled, tiny setae scattered very sparsely over the surface; lateral marginal ridge of all tergites continuous, short to long setae scattered sparsely along the lateral borders, thicker on the anterior and posterior angles. T 1 narrower than the head shield, slightly wider than T 3 and the head shield, T 10 the widest. Posterior margin of T 1 slightly concave, posterior margin of TT 3, 5, 8, 10, 12 and 14 concave; posterior angles of T 2 moderately rounded, posterior angles of T 4 slightly projecting, TT 6 and 7 with moderately sharp projections, TT 9, 11 and 13 with markedly sharply projections (Fig. 1), posteromedially straight.</p>
            <p>All sternites generally trapeziform, moderately smooth, long setae scattered sparsely over the surface; two pair of longer bristles approximately symmetrical on the surface of the anterior part of each sternite; relatively longer bristles on both lateral borders, anterior and posterior angles thicker.</p>
            <p>Legs strong; pretarsus of all legs with claws, moderately long, curved ventrad; anterior and posterior accessory claws on legs 1–14, anterior accessory claws moderately slender and feeble, forming relatively small angles with tarsal claws, posterior accessory claws moderately thicker and longer than the anterior one, forming relatively large angles with tarsal claws; no accessory claws on legs 15; distitarsus 5.5 times longer than wide, distitarsus about 60% of the whole length of tarsus on leg 15. Leg spinulation as in Table 1.</p>
            <p>Setae scattered sparsely on the surface of all legs, fewer setae on both the dorsal and the ventral side; a few slightly to indistinctly thickened setae encircling the distal margin of coxa and prefemur; many moderately long setae arranged regularly on tarsus, one row of thicker, long setae regularly arranged on the medial ventral side of basitarsus, two rows of thicker, long setae arranged on the medial ventral side of distitarsus, a shallow channel between two rows of setae; few moderatly longer setae on tarsus of legs 14 and 15, no setae arranged in rows.</p>
            <p>Coxal pores usually round, a few ovate, small to moderately large, 7–14 irregularly arranged coxal pores. Coxal pore field set in a moderately deep groove, separated from the anteroventral face of the coxa by an elliptical surface, usually with a few long setae along the fringe of the groove.</p>
            <p>ventral dorsal Letters in brackets indicate variable spines.</p>
            <p>Male 15th sternite posteromedially straight, posterior angles rounded, nearly trapezoid, fringed with few short setae along the posterior margin; few long, slender setae scattered sparsely on the both anterior and posterior angles; sternite of genital segment moderately small, usually well sclerotised; posterior margin moderately deeply concave between the condyles of the gonopods, no bulge medially; setae fairly evenly scattered on the ventral surface of the genital segment; orderly fringe of long setae along the posterior margin; gonopods short and small, only as small hemispheric protuberance, with 1 long seta (Fig. 5), tip slightly sclerotised.</p>
            <p>Material examined. 1ɗ, Campus of Dali College, Yunnan Province, 51°48'N 123°36'E, 6 June 2005, leg. Zi-zhong Yang.</p>
            <p>Distribution: China (Yunnan), Japan.</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE87B1F857697DFF3AFE4E5EE1F828	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Ma, Hui-Qin;Song, Da-Xiang;Zhu, Ming-Sheng	Ma, Hui-Qin, Song, Da-Xiang, Zhu, Ming-Sheng (2008): A review of the Chinese species of Bothropolys Wood, 1862 (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae). Zootaxa 1786: 35-47, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.182487
03FE87B1F851697BFF3AF9965DE6FE36.text	03FE87B1F851697BFF3AF9965DE6FE36.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Bothropolys imaharensis Verhoeff 1937	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Bothropolys imaharensis Verhoeff, 1937</p>
            <p>Verhoeff, 1937: 186; Takakuwa, 1939: 103; Takakuwa, 1940: 36; Wang &amp; Mauris, 1996: 91; Zapparoli, 2006.</p>
            <p>Diagnosis: Body length 13.7–20.0 mm, antennae composed of 20+20–21+21 antennomeres; 17–21, usually 20 ocelli arranged in 4 rows on each side; Tömösváry’s organ rounded, small, moderately lager than the adjoining ocelli; 7+7–10+10 blunt teeth, usually 9+9 or 10+10; porodonts thick and strong, posterior to lateral tooth; posterior angles of TT 6 and 7 feebly triangular, posterior angles of TT 9, 11 and 13 sharply triangular; pretarsus of all legs with claws; moderately long accessory claws on legs 1–15; coxal pores round or ovate, 12–34 irregularly arranged coxal pores; female gonopods with 2+2 bullet-shaped spurs and tridentate claws; male gonopods short and thick, as half-ball protuberance, with 3–4 long setae, distally slightly sclerotised.</p>
            <p>Material examined: 1 Ψ, Suifenhe City, Heilongjiang, 44°24'N 131°12'E, 15 June 2003, leg. Feng Zhang. 1 Ψ, 1 ɗ, Xiaobaishan, Fuping County, Baoding City, Hebei Province, 38°51'12.0"N 114°12'14.2"E, 2 October 2005, leg. Hui-qin Ma. 3 ΨΨ, 2 ɗɗ, Kongdongdao Town, Yantai City, Shandong Province, 37°30'N 121°30'E, 6 June 2005, leg. Hui-qin Ma.</p>
            <p>Distribution: China (Hebei, Heilongjiang, Shandong, Taiwan), Korea.</p>
            <p> Remarks: Verhoeff (1937) described  B. imaharensis from Tokyo in Japan, Takakuwa (1939, 1940) presented a number of records of the species from Taiwan and Korea, and supplemented Verhoeff’s rather scanty original description. </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE87B1F851697BFF3AF9965DE6FE36	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Ma, Hui-Qin;Song, Da-Xiang;Zhu, Ming-Sheng	Ma, Hui-Qin, Song, Da-Xiang, Zhu, Ming-Sheng (2008): A review of the Chinese species of Bothropolys Wood, 1862 (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae). Zootaxa 1786: 35-47, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.182487
03FE87B1F8506978FF3AFDEE5E12F879.text	03FE87B1F8506978FF3AFDEE5E12F879.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Bothropolys montanus Verhoeff, 1938 New Chinese	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Bothropolys montanus Verhoeff, 1938 New Chinese records </p>
            <p>Verhoeff, 1938a: 100; Takakuwa, 1940: 42; Matic, 1974: 337; Takakuwa, 1939: 103.</p>
            <p>Diagnosis: Body length 21.9 mm, antennae composed of 19+20 antennomeres; 35 ocelli arranged in 5 rows on each side; Tömösváry’s organ rounded, small, moderately smaller than the adjoining ocelli; 8+9 prosternal blunt teeth, without porodonts; posterior angles of TT 6 and 7 weakly triangular, posterior angles of TT 9, 11 and 13 sharply triangular; pretarsus of all legs with claws; only a moderately long anterior accessory claw on claws of legs 1–13; no accessory claws on legs 14 and 15; coxal pores round or ovate, 20–31 irregularly arranged coxal pores; male gonopods short and thick, as half–ball protuberance, with 6–8 long setae, distally slightly sclerotised.</p>
            <p>Description: Body length: 21.9 mm.</p>
            <p>Colour: antennae red purple to dark purple, distal antennomeres showing transition to yellow-brown, terminal antennomere yellow-brown; tergites red brown, with pale white mottling concentrated in a longitudinal median band; head shield and TT 1, 14 and 15 darker, pleural region purple with pale hue; sternites dustcolour; tip of maxillipeds black, other parts of maxillipeds and coxosternum and sternite 15 red-brown; all legs light gray to pale purple, distitarsus yellow brown.</p>
            <p>Antennae composed of 19+20 antennomeres (Fig. 6); basal antennomere the thickest, longer than wide, succeeding antennomeres remarkably longer than wide, gradually shorter and thinner, terminal antennomere 3.9 times as long as wide; abundant setae on antennal surface, but fewer setae on both ventral and outer sides in basal articles, gradually increasing in density to about the seventh antennomere, then more or less constant.</p>
            <p>Head shield smooth, convex, as long as wide, transverse suture clear, pigment concentrated as close netlike veins, tiny setae scattered very sparsely over the surface; frontal marginal ridge with shallow anterior median furrow, short to moderately long setae sparsely scattered along the frontal marginal ridge of the head shield; posterior margin of the head shield slightly concave, thicker posteromedially.</p>
            <p>35 ocelli on each side (Fig. 7), round, comparatively small, arranged in 5 irregular rows, terminal ocellus comparatively larger, the dorsal ocelli moderately large, the ventral ones relatively small; ocelli gently bulging, domed, translucent, usually darkly pigmented at eyeground, field of ocelli slightly dark.</p>
            <p>Tömösváry’s organ (Fig. 7 -To) very small, slightly rounded, moderately smaller than the adjoining ocelli, lying on the ventral margin of the head immediately proventral to the ocelli.</p>
            <p>Maxillipede coxosternite (Fig. 8) trapezoidal, medial part of the dental margin moderately arched, outboard slightly longer than inboard, median notch moderately deep and shallow, V-shaped; dental margin without shoulder, with 8+9 approximately triangular teeth, the most external tooth moderately sharp (Fig. 9); without porodonts; some scattered setae on the ventral side of the coxosternum, comparatively long and thick setae near the dental margin.</p>
            <p>Posterior margin of all tergites slightly hunched, posterolaterally narrower than anterolaterally, generally trapeziform; except for the head shield and T1, all tergites weakly wrinkled, tiny setae scattered very sparsely over the surface; lateral marginal ridge of all tergites continuous; posterior margin of T 1 straight, posterior marginal ridge of TT 1 and 3 continuous, posterior marginal ridge of other tergites interrupted. Posterior margin of TT 3 and 5 slightly concave, posterior margin of TT 8, 10, 12, 14 and 15 deeply concave; posterior angles of TT 2 and 4 moderately rounded, TT 6 and 7 slightly projecting, TT 9, 11 and 13 with markedly sharply projections (Fig. 6). Short to long setae scattered sparsely along the lateral borders, thicker on the anterior and posterior angles; T 1 as wide as the head shield, slightly wider than T 3, T10 the widest.</p>
            <p>All sternites generally trapeziform, moderately smooth, long setae scattered sparsely over the surface; short to long bristles on the lateral borders, the bristles at the anterior and posterior angles thicker.</p>
            <p>Legs strong; pretarsus of all legs with claws, curved ventrad; with posterior accessory claws only on legs 1–13, posterior accessory claws moderately thicker and strong, no claws on legs 14 and 15; setae scattered sparsely on the surface of all legs, fewer setae on both the dorsal and the ventral side; a few slightly to indistinctly thickened setae encircling the distal margin of coxa and prefemur, many long setae arranged regularly on tarsus, one row of thicker, longer setae regularly arranged on the medial ventral side of basitarsus, two rows of thicker, longer setae arranged on the medial ventral side of distitarsus, a shallow channel between the two rows of setae; few moderatly longer setae on tarsus of legs 14 and 15, without setae arranged in rows. Distitarsus 6.2 times longer than wide, about 70.5% length of tarsus on leg 15. Leg spinulation as in Table 2.</p>
            <p>Letters in brackets indicate variable spines.</p>
            <p>Coxal pores from elliptical to round, small to moderately large, 20–31 irregularly arranged coxal pores. Coxal pore field set in a moderately deep groove, usually with very sparse, long setae along the rim of the groove.</p>
            <p>Sternal setae evidently beginning with the 10th sternite, those of the 14 th sternite the thickest, 15th sternite distinctly less so, with some irregularly sunken setae, more distinct in the posterior part of the sternite. Male 15th sternite posteromedially straight, posterior angles comparatively rounded, nearly trapezoid, fringed with few short to long setae along the posterior margin; one long, slender seta on each posterior angle; sternite of the genital segment usually well sclerotised, slightly wider than long. Posterior margin moderately deeply concave between the condyles of gonopods, no bulge medially; setae fairly evenly scattered on the ventral surface of the genital segment; gonopods short and small, as small digitiform protuberance, with 6–8 long setae on the surface, tip slightly sclerotised (Fig. 10).</p>
            <p>Material examined. 1ɗ, Baiyunzhanfanghuodao, Dongzhai Town, Luoshan County, Henan Province, 32°12'N 114°30'E, 16 July 2005, leg. Zhi-sheng Zhang.</p>
            <p>Distribution: China (Henan), Japan.</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE87B1F8506978FF3AFDEE5E12F879	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Ma, Hui-Qin;Song, Da-Xiang;Zhu, Ming-Sheng	Ma, Hui-Qin, Song, Da-Xiang, Zhu, Ming-Sheng (2008): A review of the Chinese species of Bothropolys Wood, 1862 (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae). Zootaxa 1786: 35-47, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.182487
03FE87B1F85D6976FF3AFF5E5F3AFC60.text	03FE87B1F85D6976FF3AFF5E5F3AFC60.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Bothropolys richthofeni Verhoeff 1938	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Bothropolys richthofeni Verhoeff, 1938</p>
            <p>Verhoeff, 1938a: 101; Takakuwa, 1939: 103; 1940: 36; Wang &amp; Mauris, 1996: 91; Zapparoli, 2006.</p>
            <p>Diagnosis: Body length 20.7–27.1 mm, antennae composed of 18+18–20+20 antennomeres; 25–29 ocelli on each side; Tömösváry’s organ rounded, smaller than the adjoining ocelli; 9+9–9+10 blunt prosternal teeth, usually 9+9; porodonts feebly thick and long, between the third and fourth outer teeth; posterior angles of T 4 without triangular projections, posterior angles of TT 6, 7, 9, 11 and 13 sharply triangular; pretarsus of all legs with claws; moderately long anterior and posterior accessory claws, and a row setae on the ventral side of legs 1–13, no accessory claws and a row setae on legs 14 and 15; female gonopods with 2+2 bullet-shape spurs and tridentate claws; male gonopods short and small, only a mastoid protuberance, with 6–9 long setae, distally slightly sclerotised.</p>
            <p>Material examined. 5 ΨΨ, 6 ɗɗ, Xiaowutai National Natural Reserve, Yu County, Zhangjiakou City, Hebei Province, 39°54'N 115°00'E, 14 July 2002, leg. Ming-sheng Zhu, Zhi-shun Song. 22 ΨΨ, 21 ɗɗ, Xiaowutai National Natural Reserve, Yu County, Zhangjiakou City, Hebei Province, 39°54'N 115°00'E, 20 August 2005, leg. Zi-zhong Yang, Zhi-sheng Zhang, Hui-Qin Ma.</p>
            <p>Distribution: China (Taiwan, Hebei), Japan and Korea.</p>
            <p> Remarks: The original description of  B. richthofeni based on the specimens collected from Korea (Verhoeff, 1938a), Takakuwa (1940) cited it from Taiwan and described it with more detail. Present specimens’ diagnosis agree exactly with their description of this species. </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE87B1F85D6976FF3AFF5E5F3AFC60	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Ma, Hui-Qin;Song, Da-Xiang;Zhu, Ming-Sheng	Ma, Hui-Qin, Song, Da-Xiang, Zhu, Ming-Sheng (2008): A review of the Chinese species of Bothropolys Wood, 1862 (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae). Zootaxa 1786: 35-47, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.182487
03FE87B1F85D6977FF3AFC3358E4F9D6.text	03FE87B1F85D6977FF3AFC3358E4F9D6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Bothropolys rugosus (Meinert 1872) Meinert 1872	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Bothropolys rugosus (Meinert, 1872)</p>
            <p> Lithobius Rugosus Meinert, 1872: 306 ; synonymy by Eason, 1974: 20, figs 60411MA[A. Minelli] 26May7. </p>
            <p> Bothropolys asperatus L. Koch, 1878: 788 ; Takakuwa, 1940: 36; Wang &amp; Mauris, 1996: 91; synonymy by Eason, 1974: 4, 20. </p>
            <p> Lithobius thetidis Karsch, 1880: 848 ; synonymy by Eason, 1974: 3, 20. </p>
            <p> Bothropolys shimensis Pocock, 1895: 349 ; synonymy by Eason, 1974: 3, 20. </p>
            <p> Bothropolys spinosior Chamberlin, 1920: 78 ; synonymy by Eason, 1974: 4, 20. </p>
            <p> Bothropolys migrans Chamberlin, 1930: 69 ; synonymy by Eason, 1974: 4. </p>
            <p>Diagnosis: Body length 15.1–20.5 mm, antennae composed of 20+20 antennomeres; 20 ocelli arranged in 4 rows on each side; Tömösváry’s organ rounded, moderately large, about equal to the adjoining ocelli; 5+5– 8+8 blunt prosternal teeth, usually 6+6 and 7+7; porodonts thick and strong, posterior to the most lateral tooth; posterior angles of T 6 feebly triangular, T 7 weakly triangular, posterior angles of TT 9, 11 and 13 sharply triangular; pretarsus of all legs with claws; moderately long accessory claws on legs 1–13, no accessory claws on legs 14 and 15; coxal pores round or ovate, 7–23 irregularly arranged coxal pores; female gonopods with 2+2 or 3+3 bullet-shaped spurs and tridentate claws; male gonopods short and thick, as a mastoid protuberance, with 2–4 long setae, distally slightly sclerotised.</p>
            <p>Material examined: 1 ɗ, Baiyunzhan Natural Reserve, Dongzhai Town, Luoshan County, Heilongjiang Province, 32°12'N 114°30'E, 15 July 2005, leg. Zhi-sheng Zhang. 5 ΨΨ, 1 ɗ, Tanquanqiao Town, Huangshan County, Anhui Province, 30°06'N 118°06'E, 3 June 2005, leg. Zhi-shun Song. 1 ɗ, Bamaoxi, Sangzhi County, Hunan Province, 29°18'N 110°06'E, 3 June 2002, leg. Zhi-sheng Zhang, Jin-yu Yang. 1 Ψ, 3 ɗɗ, Qingliangdian Town, Wuyi County, Hengshui City, Hebei Province, 37°36'N 115°48'E, 5 May 2005, leg. Hui-qin Ma. 10 ΨΨ, 9 ɗɗ, Huashan Mountain, Huayin County, Shanxi Province, 34°31'35.8"N 110°05'28.8"E, 10 October 2005, leg. Hui-qin Ma. 2 ΨΨ, 2 ɗɗ, Longzetan, Tongbai County, Henan Province, 32°20'45.9"N 113°24'11.5"E, 18 October 2005, leg. Hui-qin Ma. 19 ΨΨ, 19 ɗɗ, Hantai County, Hanzhong City, Shanxi Province, 33°00'N 107°00'E, 15 October 2005, leg. Hui-qin Ma. 1 Ψ, Yuelushan Mountain, Changsha City, Huanan Province, 28°06'N 112°54'E, 15 May 2002, Zhi-sheng Zhang. 1 Ψ, Taocheng County, Hengshui City, Hebei Province, 37°42'N 115°42'E, 6 November 2005, leg. Hui-qin Ma. 4 ɗɗ, Nanhu Park, Nanzheng County, Hanzhong City, Shanxi Province, 32°57'25.2"N 106°54'18.7"E, 15 October 2005, leg. Hui-qin Ma. 1 Ψ, 4 ɗɗ, Xiaowutai National Natural Reserve, Yu County, Zhangjiakou City, Hebei Province, 39°54'N 115°00'E, 20 September 2005, leg. Zi-zhong Yang, Feng Zhang. 2 ΨΨ, 3 ɗɗ, Xiaowutai National Natural Reserve, Yu County, Zhangjiakou City, Hebei Province, 39°54'N 115°00'E, 20 August 2005, leg. Zi-zhong Yang, Zhi-sheng Zhang, Hui-Qin Ma. 3 ΨΨ, 1 ɗ, Muyu Town, Qingchuan County, Guangyuan City, Sichuan Province, 32°30'N 105°12'E, 14 June 2003, leg. Zhi-shun Song. 1 Ψ, Chayashan Mountain, Suiping City, Henan Province, 33°06'N 113°42'E, 7 June 2005, leg. Zhi-sheng Zhang. 3 ΨΨ, Longquanshan Forest Park, Meitan County, Guizhou Province, 27°42'N 107°24'E, 3 August 2003, leg. Zhi-shun Song. 3 ɗɗ, Dongfeng Park, Baoding City, Hebei Province, 38°48'N 115°24'E, 8 August 2003, leg. Zi-zhong Yang, Zhi-sheng Zhang. 2 ΨΨ, 3 ɗɗ, Tang County, Baoding City, Hebei Province, 38°42'N 114°54'E, 1 October 2005, leg. Zhisheng Zhang. 1 Ψ, Wuqiang County, Hengshui City, Hebei Province, 37°54'N 115°48'E, 3 May 2005, leg. Hui-qin Ma. 1 Ψ, Huaping Park, Longsheng City, Guangxi Province, 25°42'N 110°00'E, 13 October 2005, leg. Ji-liang Wang, Chao Gao. 2 ΨΨ, 1 ɗ, Yingezhuang village, Baoding City, Hebei Province, 38°48'N 115°24'E, 8 August 2003, leg. Zhi-sheng Zhang, Zi-zhong Yang. 1 Ψ, 2 ɗɗ, Pujiu Temple, Yongji County, Yuncheng City, Shaanxi Province, 34°50'42"N 110°19'45.2"E, 8 October 2005, leg. Hui-qin Ma. 5 ΨΨ, 5 ɗɗ, Tongbai County, Henan Province, 32°21'40.1"N 113°24'7.8"E, 18 October 2005, Leg. Hui-qin Ma. 1 Ψ, Campus of Hebei University, Baoding City, 38°48'N 115°24'E, 8 August 2005, leg. Hui-qin Ma. 1 Ψ, 1 ɗ, Aizhen Park, Huangshan City, Anhui Province, 30°06'N 118°06'E, 11 August 2002, leg. Zhi-shun Song, Xin-sheng Tang. 1 ɗ, Jigongshan Mountain, Xinyang City, Henan Province, 31°42'N 114°00'E, 12 June 2005, leg. Bao-shi Zhang. 22 ΨΨ, 36 ɗɗ, Tongmian Town, Ningming County, 21°42'N 107°18'E, 17 May 2006, leg. Hui-qin Ma. 1 Ψ, 1 ɗ, Daqingshan Mountain, Longchuan County, Pingxiang City, Guangxi Province, 24°06'N 106°48'E, 14 May 2006, Leg. Hui-qin Ma. 6 ΨΨ, 10 ɗɗ, Damingshan Mountain, Wuming County, Nanning City, Guangxi Province, 23°24'N 108°30'E, 10 May 2006, leg. Hui-qin Ma. 2 ΨΨ, Shibanyan Town, Linzhou County, Anyang City, Henan Province, 36°6'N 113°42'E, 22 June 2006, leg. Li-min Zhu. 1 ɗ, Matishi village, Langping Town, Tianlin County, Baise City, Guangxi Province, 24°24'N 106°18'E, 26 May 2006. 1 Ψ, Campus of Hebei University, Baoding City, 38°48'N 115°24'E, 18 October 2006, leg. Zhi-yong Di. 3 ɗɗ, Botanic Park, Baoding City, Hebei Province, 38°48'N 115°24'E, 5 October 2006, leg. Jomo. 2 ΨΨ, 1 ɗ, Hami City, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, 42°48'N 93°24'E, 25 June 2006, leg. Hui-qin Ma. 2 ΨΨ, 1 ɗ, Fanzhi County, Shaanxi Province, 39°12'26.5"N 113°15'29.3"E, 5 October 2005, leg. Hui-qin Ma.</p>
            <p>Distribution: Uzbekistan, Kirghizstan, China (Henan, Hebei, Hunan, Guangxi, Shanxi, Shaanxi, Xinjiang, Taiwan), Japan, Korea, the Philippines, New Guinea, the Hawaiian Islands, North America.</p>
            <p> Remarks: This species is not only naturally widespread in China, but also widespread in eastern Asia. However, it was also found in the Hawaiian Islands, Eason (1974, 1977) suggested that  B. rugosus had been introduced in the Hawaiian Islands from either Japan or the mainland of eastern Asia. </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE87B1F85D6977FF3AFC3358E4F9D6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Ma, Hui-Qin;Song, Da-Xiang;Zhu, Ming-Sheng	Ma, Hui-Qin, Song, Da-Xiang, Zhu, Ming-Sheng (2008): A review of the Chinese species of Bothropolys Wood, 1862 (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae). Zootaxa 1786: 35-47, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.182487
03FE87B1F85C6974FF3AF94E5F4CFDBE.text	03FE87B1F85C6974FF3AF94E5F4CFDBE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Bothropolys shanxiensis Takakuwa & Takashima 1949	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Bothropolys shanxiensis Takakuwa &amp; Takashima, 1949</p>
            <p> Bothropolys Shanxiensis Takakuwa &amp; Takashima, 1949: 59 ; Wang Mauris, 1996: 91; Zapparoli, 2006. </p>
            <p>Diagnosis: Body length 15.7–25.7 mm, antennae composed of 20+20 antennomeres; 21–28 ocelli on each side; Tömösváry’s organ almost rounded, moderately smaller than the adjoining ocelli; 6+6–9+9 blunt prosternal teeth, usually 7+7; porodonts feebly slender and long, between the second and third outer teeth; posterior angles of T 4 bluntly triangular, posterior angles of TT 6, 7, 9, 11 and 13 sharply triangular; pretarsus of all legs with claws; moderately long accessory claws on both anterior and posterior side of legs 1–13, no accessory claws on legs 14 and 15; female gonopods with 2+2 coniform spurs and tridentate claws. Male gonopods short and small, as a mastoid protuberance, with 6–9 long setae, distally slightly sclerotised.</p>
            <p>Material examined. 11 ΨΨ, 6 ɗɗ, Xiaowutai National Natural Reserve, Yu County, Zhangjiakou City, Hebei Province, 39°54'N 115°00'E, 20 August 2005, leg. Zhi-sheng Zhang, Zi-zhong Yang, Hui-Qin Ma. 1 Ψ, 3 ɗɗ, Xiaowutai National Natural Reserve, Yu County, Zhangjiakou City, Hebei Province, 39°54'N 115°00'E, 20 July 2002, leg. Ming-sheng Zhu, Zhi-shun Song.</p>
            <p>Distribution: China (Shaanxi, Hebei).</p>
            <p> Remarks: Although not collected from type locality, the present specimens with 6+6–9+9 blunt prosternal teeth, usually 7+7; porodonts between the second and third outer teeth; posterior angles of TT 6, 7, 9, 11 and 13 sharply triangular; female gonopods with 2+2 coniform spurs, agree exactly with Takakuwa and Takashima’s brief original description of  B. shanxiensis . </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE87B1F85C6974FF3AF94E5F4CFDBE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Ma, Hui-Qin;Song, Da-Xiang;Zhu, Ming-Sheng	Ma, Hui-Qin, Song, Da-Xiang, Zhu, Ming-Sheng (2008): A review of the Chinese species of Bothropolys Wood, 1862 (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae). Zootaxa 1786: 35-47, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.182487
03FE87B1F85F6975FF3AF8C659F1FD1D.text	03FE87B1F85F6975FF3AF8C659F1FD1D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Bothropolys	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Key to Chinese species of  Bothropolys</p>
            <p> To assist in the identification of the Chinese species of  Bothropolys , the following key is offered. This key emphasizes characters that can be examined without much dissection or high-magnification microscopy; moreover, these characters are specific to the taxa occurring in China. The Chinese records of  Bothropolys species are shown in Fig. 11. </p>
            <p>1a. Porodont present ......................................................................................................................................... 2</p>
            <p> 1b. Porodont not present, 35 ocelli on each side, maxillipede dental margin with 9–10 teeth ........  B. montanus</p>
            <p>2a. Porodont near the outer tooth, but not between the outer first and second teeth........................................ 3</p>
            <p>2b. Porodont between the teeth......................................................................................................................... 5</p>
            <p>3a. One terminal ocellus comparatively bigger than the others, posterior angles of TT 6 and 7 with feeble pro- jections........................................................................................................................................................ 4</p>
            <p> 3b. Two terminal ocelli comparatively bigger than the others, posterior angles of T 6 with feeble projections, posterior angles of T 7 with moderately triangular projections ...................................................  B. rugosus</p>
            <p> 4a. Female gonopod with 3 spurs, dental margin usually with 9+9–10+10 teeth .......................  B. imaharensis</p>
            <p> 4b. Female gonopod with one spur, dental margin usually with 7+7 teeth ............................  B. crassidentatus</p>
            <p> 5a. Ocelli arranged into 5 rows, two terminal ocelli comparatively bigger than the others, porodont between outer the third and fourth teeth ...............................................................................................  B. richthofeni</p>
            <p>5b. Ocelli arranged into 4 rows, t he terminal ocellus comparatively bigger than the others ........................... 6</p>
            <p> 6a. Porodont between the second and third outer teeth, 17–27 coxal pores................................  B. shanxiensis</p>
            <p> 6b. Porodont between the outer fourth and fifth teeth, 8–14 coxal pores........................................  B. curvatus</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE87B1F85F6975FF3AF8C659F1FD1D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Ma, Hui-Qin;Song, Da-Xiang;Zhu, Ming-Sheng	Ma, Hui-Qin, Song, Da-Xiang, Zhu, Ming-Sheng (2008): A review of the Chinese species of Bothropolys Wood, 1862 (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae). Zootaxa 1786: 35-47, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.182487
