taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03F4DE25FFC8FA33FF26FA813623FCB5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10114620/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10114620	Figure 2. Schematic representation of the modern and fossil murine rodents compared to Malpaisomys. Top, molecular phylogeny after Chevret (1994) and Chevret et al. (2001). A calibration of the time of divergence between taxa is given by reference to the divergence of the Rattus rattus lineage, estimated as having occurred 12 Mya (Chevret et al., 2001). The grey box includes the arvicanthine rodents, characterized by a herbivorous diet. Bottom, fossil lineages with investigated localities. Thick grey lines indicate taxa with stephanodont characteristics, thick black lines, complete stephanodonty. Crosses indicate extinct taxa.	Figure 2. Schematic representation of the modern and fossil murine rodents compared to Malpaisomys. Top, molecular phylogeny after Chevret (1994) and Chevret et al. (2001). A calibration of the time of divergence between taxa is given by reference to the divergence of the Rattus rattus lineage, estimated as having occurred 12 Mya (Chevret et al., 2001). The grey box includes the arvicanthine rodents, characterized by a herbivorous diet. Bottom, fossil lineages with investigated localities. Thick grey lines indicate taxa with stephanodont characteristics, thick black lines, complete stephanodonty. Crosses indicate extinct taxa.	2004-12-31	Renaud, Sabrina;Michaux, Jacques		Zenodo	biologists	Renaud, Sabrina;Michaux, Jacques			
03F4DE25FFCCFA36FCE0FB063634FB87.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5431864/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5431864	Figure 3. Morphological differentiation of the dental outline among murine rodents. A, upper molars. Group means on CA1 and 2. Dotted lines show the fossil lineages leading from Progonomys hispanicus to Occitanomys and to Stephanomys, and from Pr. cathalai to Paraethomys. Outlines correspond to some group means. B, upper molars, CA1 and 3. C, lower molars, CA1 and 2. For locality and sample abbreviations see Table 1.	Figure 3. Morphological differentiation of the dental outline among murine rodents. A, upper molars. Group means on CA1 and 2. Dotted lines show the fossil lineages leading from Progonomys hispanicus to Occitanomys and to Stephanomys, and from Pr. cathalai to Paraethomys. Outlines correspond to some group means. B, upper molars, CA1 and 3. C, lower molars, CA1 and 2. For locality and sample abbreviations see Table 1.	2004-12-31	Renaud, Sabrina;Michaux, Jacques		Zenodo	biologists	Renaud, Sabrina;Michaux, Jacques			
03F4DE25FFCCFA36FCE0FB063634FB87.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5431866/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5431866	Figure 4. Cluster analysis of the shape of the upper molar. Euclidean distances between group means were calculated based on Fourier coefficients up to the ninth harmonic (CF9). Clustering method was UPGMA (unweighted pair-group method, arithmetic average). Symbols as per Fig. 3. For locality and sample abbreviations see Table 1.	Figure 4. Cluster analysis of the shape of the upper molar. Euclidean distances between group means were calculated based on Fourier coefficients up to the ninth harmonic (CF9). Clustering method was UPGMA (unweighted pair-group method, arithmetic average). Symbols as per Fig. 3. For locality and sample abbreviations see Table 1.	2004-12-31	Renaud, Sabrina;Michaux, Jacques		Zenodo	biologists	Renaud, Sabrina;Michaux, Jacques			
03F4DE25FFC5FA3CFCB8FE0F33ACFA55.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5431870/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5431870	Figure 7. Relationship between time interval and morphological evolution regarding size (A, C) and shape (B, D) of the first upper molars. Size distance is estimated as differences in A0, shape distance as the Euclidean distance calculated based on the Fourier coefficients of the first nine harmonics. (A, B) Log-log relationship between evolutionary rates and time interval. (C, D) Relationship between time interval and morphological distance. Lines correspond to a linear regression on the Occitanomys/Stephanomys lineage (black line), the Paraethomys lineage (light grey line), and modern taxa (dark grey line). Dotted lines P <0.05; solid line P <0.001. (A) pair including Malpaisomys; (Δ) corresponds to the distance between a pair of Malpaisomys samples, Costa Calma and CVA4. Locality or sample abbreviations per Table 1.	Figure 7. Relationship between time interval and morphological evolution regarding size (A, C) and shape (B, D) of the first upper molars. Size distance is estimated as differences in A0, shape distance as the Euclidean distance calculated based on the Fourier coefficients of the first nine harmonics. (A, B) Log-log relationship between evolutionary rates and time interval. (C, D) Relationship between time interval and morphological distance. Lines correspond to a linear regression on the Occitanomys/Stephanomys lineage (black line), the Paraethomys lineage (light grey line), and modern taxa (dark grey line). Dotted lines P <0.05; solid line P <0.001. (A) pair including Malpaisomys; (Δ) corresponds to the distance between a pair of Malpaisomys samples, Costa Calma and CVA4. Locality or sample abbreviations per Table 1.	2004-12-31	Renaud, Sabrina;Michaux, Jacques		Zenodo	biologists	Renaud, Sabrina;Michaux, Jacques			
03F4DE25FFC5FA3CFCB8FE0F33ACFA55.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5431864/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5431864	Figure 3. Morphological differentiation of the dental outline among murine rodents. A, upper molars. Group means on CA1 and 2. Dotted lines show the fossil lineages leading from Progonomys hispanicus to Occitanomys and to Stephanomys, and from Pr. cathalai to Paraethomys. Outlines correspond to some group means. B, upper molars, CA1 and 3. C, lower molars, CA1 and 2. For locality and sample abbreviations see Table 1.	Figure 3. Morphological differentiation of the dental outline among murine rodents. A, upper molars. Group means on CA1 and 2. Dotted lines show the fossil lineages leading from Progonomys hispanicus to Occitanomys and to Stephanomys, and from Pr. cathalai to Paraethomys. Outlines correspond to some group means. B, upper molars, CA1 and 3. C, lower molars, CA1 and 2. For locality and sample abbreviations see Table 1.	2004-12-31	Renaud, Sabrina;Michaux, Jacques		Zenodo	biologists	Renaud, Sabrina;Michaux, Jacques			
03F4DE25FFC5FA3CFCB8FE0F33ACFA55.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5431866/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5431866	Figure 4. Cluster analysis of the shape of the upper molar. Euclidean distances between group means were calculated based on Fourier coefficients up to the ninth harmonic (CF9). Clustering method was UPGMA (unweighted pair-group method, arithmetic average). Symbols as per Fig. 3. For locality and sample abbreviations see Table 1.	Figure 4. Cluster analysis of the shape of the upper molar. Euclidean distances between group means were calculated based on Fourier coefficients up to the ninth harmonic (CF9). Clustering method was UPGMA (unweighted pair-group method, arithmetic average). Symbols as per Fig. 3. For locality and sample abbreviations see Table 1.	2004-12-31	Renaud, Sabrina;Michaux, Jacques		Zenodo	biologists	Renaud, Sabrina;Michaux, Jacques			
03F4DE25FFC4FA3CFF66F9DF37B9FC8A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5431870/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5431870	Figure 7. Relationship between time interval and morphological evolution regarding size (A, C) and shape (B, D) of the first upper molars. Size distance is estimated as differences in A0, shape distance as the Euclidean distance calculated based on the Fourier coefficients of the first nine harmonics. (A, B) Log-log relationship between evolutionary rates and time interval. (C, D) Relationship between time interval and morphological distance. Lines correspond to a linear regression on the Occitanomys/Stephanomys lineage (black line), the Paraethomys lineage (light grey line), and modern taxa (dark grey line). Dotted lines P <0.05; solid line P <0.001. (A) pair including Malpaisomys; (Δ) corresponds to the distance between a pair of Malpaisomys samples, Costa Calma and CVA4. Locality or sample abbreviations per Table 1.	Figure 7. Relationship between time interval and morphological evolution regarding size (A, C) and shape (B, D) of the first upper molars. Size distance is estimated as differences in A0, shape distance as the Euclidean distance calculated based on the Fourier coefficients of the first nine harmonics. (A, B) Log-log relationship between evolutionary rates and time interval. (C, D) Relationship between time interval and morphological distance. Lines correspond to a linear regression on the Occitanomys/Stephanomys lineage (black line), the Paraethomys lineage (light grey line), and modern taxa (dark grey line). Dotted lines P <0.05; solid line P <0.001. (A) pair including Malpaisomys; (Δ) corresponds to the distance between a pair of Malpaisomys samples, Costa Calma and CVA4. Locality or sample abbreviations per Table 1.	2004-12-31	Renaud, Sabrina;Michaux, Jacques		Zenodo	biologists	Renaud, Sabrina;Michaux, Jacques			
03F4DE25FFC4FA3CFF66F9DF37B9FC8A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5431868/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5431868	Figure 5. Morphological differentiation within Malpaisomys. Size of the first upper (A) and lower (B) molars. Shape of the first upper (C) and lower (D) molars, estimated by the scores on the first and second canonical axes of the analysis of Malpaisomys. The dotted ellipses indicate the 95% confidence interval for each sample.	Figure 5. Morphological differentiation within Malpaisomys. Size of the first upper (A) and lower (B) molars. Shape of the first upper (C) and lower (D) molars, estimated by the scores on the first and second canonical axes of the analysis of Malpaisomys. The dotted ellipses indicate the 95% confidence interval for each sample.	2004-12-31	Renaud, Sabrina;Michaux, Jacques		Zenodo	biologists	Renaud, Sabrina;Michaux, Jacques			
