identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03F787EFE01EFFE5119CFA0F0E22F83A.text	03F787EFE01EFFE5119CFA0F0E22F83A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lepidocyrtus sensu subsp. lato	<div><p>Lepidocyrtus sensu lato</p><p>Within Entomobryidae genus Lepidocyrtus s. l. is characterised by the following set of characters:</p><p>Body elongate, with finely striated scales, all rounded or truncate. Fourth abdominal segment at midline more than 2.5 times length of third. Head with 8 + 8 ommatidia (G and H may be strongly reduced). Antennae with 4 segments. Fourth antennal segment at least half as long as third. Trochanteral organ present on third legs. Manubrium and dentes with normal scales, without spines. Dentes dorsally crenulate and curving upward, basally in line with manubrium. Mucro short, bidentate, with a basal spine (with or without spinelet), without setae. First antennal segment with three dorsal microchaetae. Tergal bothriotricha on head/thorax/abdomen such as 1/00/ 0 23200. Tergal sens formula from th.II to abd.III such as 11/011, without accessory s-chaeta associated with seta p 6 in these segments.</p><p>In the present systematics section Wang et al. (2003) criteria for subgeneric allocation of studied specimens is used (see Table 1).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F787EFE01EFFE5119CFA0F0E22F83A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Mateos, Eduardo;Greenslade, Penelope	Mateos, Eduardo, Greenslade, Penelope (2015): Towards understanding Lepidocyrtus Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) I: diagnosis of the subgenus Setogaster, new records and redescriptions of species. Zootaxa 4044 (1): 105-129, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4044.1.6
03F787EFE019FFE1119CFC620DD6FAD0.text	03F787EFE019FFE1119CFC620DD6FAD0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lepidocyrtus (Setogaster) nigrofasciatus Womersley 1934	<div><p>Lepidocyrtus (Setogaster) nigrofasciatus Womersley, 1934 comb. nov.</p><p>Figs 1–2, 9–33, 49, Tabs 2–3</p><p>Material examined. Holotype, (SAM I22550), SOUTH AUSTRALIA, Mt Osmond, 34.9584S 138.66637E, in moss, 6.vi.1934, H. Womersley; two ‘cotypes’ (SAM I22552-a, I22552-b), VICTORIA, Kalorama, Mt. Dandenong, 37.833878S 145.368247E, 17.v.1932, J.W. Rath; two paratypes (SAM I22551 and I22554), same data as holotype. All slides deposited at SAM.</p><p>Other material. Three specimens, VICTORIA, Yarra Ranges National Park, 37.50687S 145.77692E, The Beeches, Lady Talbot Drive, in moss, 15.v.2009, G. Perdomo (sample LP309); three specimens, SOUTH AUSTRALIA, Mt Bold, 35.120206S 138.705340E, 4.v.1975, P. Greenslade (sample LP323); two specimens, Belair National Park, Mt Lofty Ranges, 35.00063S 138.64327E, 309 m asl, 29.vii.2014, P. Greenslade (sample LP378). All specimens deposited at University of Barcelona.</p><p>Description. Adult body length (without head and furca) 0.7–1.0 mm. Mesothorax not projecting over head. Body dorsoventrally compressed with dark blue pigment present on th.II to abd.III, dispersed spots on dorsal and ventral head, ant.I–IV, and on coxae and trochanters of three pair of legs (Fig. 1); several specimens with diffuse pigment (or absent) from th.II to abd.II (Fig. 2); densely black pigmented ocular areas.</p><p>Antenna without scales. Basis of ant.I dorsally and ventrally with three microchaetae arranged in triangle (Fig. 9). Ant.III organ composed of two subcylindrical sensory rods partially covered by integumentary fold (Fig. 10). Ant.IV with subapical chaeta of mushroom-shaped named here “T-chaeta” (Fig. 11); without apical bulb.</p><p>Ciliated prelabral chaetae and smooth labral chaetae in typical number 4/5,5,4; chaetae of apical row thicker than those in other rows. Closed inverted V-shaped labral apical intrusion; labral papillae smooth (Fig. 12). Lateral process ( sensu Fjellberg 1999) of outer labial papilla short, tip not reaching apex of papilla (Fig. 13). Maxillary palp outer lobe with two subequal smooth chaetae and three smooth sublobal appendages (Fig. 14). Labial anterior row formed by five smooth chaetae (a1–a5); posterior row formed by ciliated chaetae with formula M1M2R*EL1L2; chaeta M1 a little shorter than M2; chaeta R half in length of M2, E, L1 and L2 chaetae (marked with *); ventral cephalic groove with 3+3 ciliated chaetae (Fig. 15).</p><p>Dorsal macrochaetae formula such as AoA2s A2A4M 2/00/01 *00+3 (Figs16–17). Interocular chaetotaxy with ciliated chaetae s, t, p, and 2–4 scales (Fig. 18). Eyes G and H small and difficult to see on the slides. Th.II–III and abd.I dorsal chaetotaxy as in Figs 19–21. Abd.II chaetotaxy as in Fig. 22; chaetae ml and a2p absent; chaetae mi, a2, lm and ll fan-shaped; chaeta m3 short, ciliated macrochaeta (chaeta marked with * in dorsal macrochetae formula); m5 mesochaeta. Abd.III chaetotaxy as in Fig. 23; chaeta d3 absent; chaetae mi, ml, a2, li,lm,ll,a6,im and em fan-shaped, of which a6 and li larger (paddle-like); chaeta am6 strongly ciliated and thicker than other mesochaetae; d2 microchaeta; p6 and pm6 broad ciliated macrochaetae; m7a and p8p thin ciliated macrochaetae; with lateral tuft of ±100 long ciliated filaments (Fig. 24). Abd.IV chaetotaxy as in Fig. 25; bothriotrichum T2 without accessory chaeta s; chaetae m, D1, pi and pe fan-shaped, from which m and D1 larger (paddle-like); chaeta a bilobed-fan-shaped (Fig. 26); C1 mesochaeta; macrochaeta B6 with socket of minor diameter than macrochaetae B4 and B5; with seven dorsal long S-chaetae (S-chaetae are smooth, slightly blunt and more translucent under light microscope than normal chaetae, see Zhang &amp; Deharveng 2014); with two lateral pseudopori located external to chaetae r4–r5.</p><p>Ventral tube without scales; 7+7 ciliated chaetae on anterior side (Fig. 27); all chaetae on posterior side ciliated; each lateral flap with maximum of 5 ciliated chaetae and 5 smooth chaetae (Fig. 28).</p><p>Legs without scales. V shaped trochanteral organ (leg III) with maximum of 14 smooth straight chaetae arranged in triangular shape (Fig. 29). Unguis with well-developed basal pair of teeth at 36% from base of the inner edge, and with two small inner teeth at 71% and 89% from base of inner edge respectively; unguiculus truncate and with apically serrated outer margin; spatulate tibiotarsal tenent hair (Fig. 30). Manubrium without scales on dorsal surface; dentes with small, rounded basal tubercle (Fig. 31); mucronal basal spine with spinelet (Fig. 32); manubrial plate with two pseudopori, 2 inner chaetae, and 2–3 outer chaetae (Fig. 33).</p><p>Discussion. The presence of small rounded dental tubercle and spinelet on the basal mucronal spine permit to assign this species to the subgenus Setogaster.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F787EFE019FFE1119CFC620DD6FAD0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Mateos, Eduardo;Greenslade, Penelope	Mateos, Eduardo, Greenslade, Penelope (2015): Towards understanding Lepidocyrtus Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) I: diagnosis of the subgenus Setogaster, new records and redescriptions of species. Zootaxa 4044 (1): 105-129, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4044.1.6
03F787EFE01AFFEC119CFA4E0B1CF962.text	03F787EFE01AFFEC119CFA4E0B1CF962.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lepidocyrtus (Setogaster) praecisus Schott 1917	<div><p>Lepidocyrtus (Setogaster) praecisus Schött, 1917 comb. nov.</p><p>Figs 3, 34–35, 49, Tabs 2–3</p><p>Type material. Three lectotypes mounted on one slide and deposited at the Swedish Museum of Natural History (slide code NHRS-GULI000023339). QUEENSLAND, “Cedar Creek”, Ravenshoe, 17.645940S 145.509228E, 947 m asl, 1917, Mjöberg expedition, Riksmusset, Stockholm, Sweden.</p><p>Other material examined. Two specimens deposited at SAM, WESTERN AUSTRALIA, Government Gardens, Perth, 31.957542S 115.862231E, 5 m asl, 10.ii.1931, H. Womersley (slide codes SAM 001 and SAM 002); one specimen deposited at SAM, VICTORIA, You Yang Mts, 142 m asl., 24.ix.1931, J.W. Rath (slide code SAM 003); one specimen deposited at SAM, SOUTH AUSTRALIA, Adelaide, 124 m asl, 1929, D.S. Swan (slide code SAM 030); one specimen deposited at SAM, Mt Osmond, 34.9584S 138.66637E, 342 m asl, 19.vii.2005, P. Greenslade (slide code PG2); one specimen deposited at SAM, Kangaroo Is, 35.775131S 137.214674E, June 2010, 201 m asl, P. Greenslade, M. Stevens (slide code PG1); three specimens deposited at University of Barcelona, Mt Lofty Ranges, Belair National Park, Pines oval, 35.004984S 138.639130E, 268 m asl, 9.vii.1978, P. Greenslade (sample LP311).</p><p>Description. Adult body length (without head and furca) 1.0– 1.4 mm. Mesothorax not projecting over the head. Body dorsoventrally compressed with light blue pigment present on head, thorax and abdomen (Fig. 3); densely black pigmented ocular areas.</p><p>Antenna without scales. Basis of ant.I dorsally and ventrally with three microchaetae arranged in triangle. Ant.III organ composed of two subcylindrical sensory rods partially covered by an integumentary fold. Ant.IV with a subapical T-chaeta (see Fig. 11); without apical bulb.</p><p>Ciliated prelabral chaetae and smooth labral chaetae in typical number 4/5,5,4; chaetae of apical row thicker than those in other rows. Nearly closed inverted V-shaped labral apical intrusion; labral papillae smooth. Lateral process ( sensu Fjellberg 1999) of outer labial papilla short, tip not reaching the apex of papilla. Maxillary palp outer lobe with two subequal smooth chaetae and 3–4 smooth sublobal hairs. Labial chaetotaxy M1M2R*EL1L2; chaeta M1 a little shorter than M2; chaeta R half in length of M2, E, L1 and L2 chaetae (marked with *); ventral cephalic groove with 3+3 ciliated chaetae.</p><p>Dorsal macrochaetae formula such as AoA2s A2A4M 2/00/01 *00+3; abd.II chaeta m3 short ciliated macrochaeta (chaeta marked with * in dorsal macrochaetae formula). The general dorsal chaetotaxy the same as for S. nigrofasciatus (see Figs 16–26); chaetae F2 and F3 on abd.IV are mesochaetae (instead of macrochaetae as in L. (S.) nigrofasciatus) (Fig. 34). Three specimens (slide codes SAM001, SAM002, SAM003, determined by Womersley as L. praecisus) lacking lateral tuft of filaments on abd.III.</p><p>Legs, trochanteral organ, unguis, ventral tube, and furca as S. nigrofasciatus, but unguis basal teeth less developed (Fig. 35). One specimen (SAM-003) with empodial appendages of three legs pointed instead of truncate.</p><p>Discussion. On the three lectotype specimens the chaetotaxy are practically invisible; but five important characters are distinguishable: presence of subapical T-chaeta on ant.IV, dorsal cephalic macrochaetotaxy as AoA2s A2A4M2, presence of lateral tuft of filaments on abd.III, distance between bothriotricha T2 and T4 on abd.IV, and presence of spinelet on basal mucronal spine. The presence of a small rounded dental tubercle and spinelet on the basal mucronal spine allow this species to be placed in the subgenus Setogaster. Apart from the colour pattern and body size, nigrofasciatus and praecisus are similar species. The only chaetotaxic difference is that chaetae F2 and F3 of abd.IV is a macrochaetae in nigrofasciatus and a mesochaetae in praecisus .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F787EFE01AFFEC119CFA4E0B1CF962	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Mateos, Eduardo;Greenslade, Penelope	Mateos, Eduardo, Greenslade, Penelope (2015): Towards understanding Lepidocyrtus Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) I: diagnosis of the subgenus Setogaster, new records and redescriptions of species. Zootaxa 4044 (1): 105-129, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4044.1.6
03F787EFE017FFEB119CF8DC0BB9FE95.text	03F787EFE017FFEB119CF8DC0BB9FE95.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lepidocyrtus (Setogaster) fasciatus (Salmon 1951) Salmon 1951	<div><p>Lepidocyrtus (Setogaster) fasciatus (Salmon, 1951) comb.nov.</p><p>Figs 5, 36–37, Tabs 2–3</p><p>Trichogaster fasciata Salmon, 1951 (Salmon 1951a)</p><p>Setogaster fasciatus (Salmon, 1951) (according to Salmon 1951b, in Salmon 1964) Material examined. Holotype (J. T. Salmon Colln Nº 36). SINGAPORE, McRitchie Reservoir, 1.330470N 103.82950E, 37 m asl, 22.x.1949, among fibrous roots and dead vegetation, M.W.F. Tweedie, Te Papa Museum, Wellington, New Zealand.</p><p>Description. Body length (without head and furca) 0.82 mm. Mesothorax not projecting over the head. Body dorsoventrally compressed with dark blue pigment present on ant.I–IV, along edges of thoracic terga, dorsolaterally around posterior half of abd.II, the entire of abd.III, V and VI; abd.IV with violet shading laterally and dorso-posteriorly; densely black pigmented ocular areas (Fig. 5).</p><p>Antenna without scales. Antennal chaetotaxy not visible; without apical bulb.</p><p>Ciliated prelabral chaetae. Labial anterior row formed by five smooth chaetae (a1–a5); posterior row formed by ciliated chaetae with formula M1M2?EL1L2; chaeta R not visible (marked with?). Ventral cephalic groove with 3+3 ciliated chaetae.</p><p>Dorsal macrochaetal formula as AoA2s A2A4???/00/0??0+3. Cephalic chaetae of rows M and S not visible; A3 mesochaeta, A4 macrochaeta.Th.II–III without macrochaetae (micro/mesochaetae chaetotaxy not visible). Abd.I– II–III dorsal chaetotaxy not visible. Abd.III with a lateral tuft of ±100 long ciliated filaments (Fig. 36). Abd.IV macrochaetotaxy as in L. (S.) nigrofasciatus (see Fig. 25); on bothriotrichum T2 complex chaetae a and D1 detached and only insertions visible, but chaeta m present as paddle-like fan-shaped morphology (as in L. (S.) nigrofasciatus, see Fig. 26); with two lateral pseudopori located external to chaetae r4–r5.</p><p>Ventral tube and legs without scales. Unguis with a highly developed basal pair of teeth at 16% of the inner edge, and with one small inner tooth at 90% from the base of inner edge; unguiculus truncate; spatulate tibiotarsal tenent hair (Fig. 37).</p><p>Manubrium without scales on dorsal surface; dental basal tubercle not visible (or absent); mucronal basal spine with spinelet.</p><p>Discussion. It was impossible to describe more details of the chaetotaxy of this specimen because of the state of the slide, but the characters observed allow us to assign the specimen to the subgenus Setogaster.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F787EFE017FFEB119CF8DC0BB9FE95	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Mateos, Eduardo;Greenslade, Penelope	Mateos, Eduardo, Greenslade, Penelope (2015): Towards understanding Lepidocyrtus Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) I: diagnosis of the subgenus Setogaster, new records and redescriptions of species. Zootaxa 4044 (1): 105-129, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4044.1.6
03F787EFE010FFEB119CFE810A01FB45.text	03F787EFE010FFEB119CFE810A01FB45.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lepidocyrtus (Setogaster) postcaeruleus	<div><p>Lepidocyrtus (Setogaster) postcaeruleus nom. nov.</p><p>Figs 6 and 38, Tabs 2–3</p><p>Trichogaster caerulea Salmon, 1951 (in Salmon 1951a)</p><p>Setogaster caeruleus (Salmon, 1951) (according to Salmon 1951b, in Salmon 1964) Lepidocyrtus caeruleus (Salmon, 1951) comb. nov., non Lepidocyrtus caeruleus Ritter, 1911 [homonymy]</p><p>Material examined. Holotype (J. T. Salmon Colln Nº 60). SINGAPORE, Catchment Area Jungle, 1.331737N 103.781941E, 30 m asl, ix.1949, in leaf mould, M.W.F. Tweedie, Te Papa Museum, Wellington, New Zealand.</p><p>Description. Body length (without head and furca) 0.46 mm. Mesothorax not projecting over the head. Body dorsoventrally compressed with blue pigment present on antenna, head, thorax, and abdomen (but see original description in Salmon 1951a); densely black pigmented ocular areas (Fig. 6). Antenna, legs, ventral tube, and dorsal surface of the manubrium unscaled.</p><p>Prelabral chaetae ciliated. Labial chaetae?M2?EL1L2 ciliated, chaetae M1 and R not visible. Head and body chaetotaxy not visible.</p><p>Unguis with highly developed basal pair of long needle-like teeth at 15% from base of inner edge; unguiculus truncate; spatulate tibiotarsal tenent hair (Fig. 38). Dental basal tubercle not visible (or absent). Mucronal basal spine with spinelet.</p><p>Discussion. It was not possible to describe more details of the chaetotaxy of this specimen because of the state of the slide, but the characters observed allow us to assign the specimen to the subgenus Setogaster. After transfer of Trichogaster caerulea Salmon to the genus Lepidocyrtus, comb. nov., the specific name of Lepidocyrtus caeruleus (Salmon, 1951) is homonymic with Lepidocyrtus caeruleus Ritter, 1911 . For this reason a new name was needed for the transferred species and Lepidocyrtus postcaeruleus nom. nov. is proposed for Salmon's species. Moreover, this species belongs to subgenus Setogaster then the complete name of this species would be Lepidocyrtus (Setogaster) caeruleus (Salmon, 1951) vs Lepidocyrtus (Lepidocyrtus) caeruleus Ritter, 1911 .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F787EFE010FFEB119CFE810A01FB45	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Mateos, Eduardo;Greenslade, Penelope	Mateos, Eduardo, Greenslade, Penelope (2015): Towards understanding Lepidocyrtus Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) I: diagnosis of the subgenus Setogaster, new records and redescriptions of species. Zootaxa 4044 (1): 105-129, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4044.1.6
03F787EFE010FFE8119CFAF10CE0FDB4.text	03F787EFE010FFE8119CFAF10CE0FDB4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lepidocyrtus (Acrocyrtus) postpallidus	<div><p>Lepidocyrtus (Acrocyrtus) postpallidus nom. nov.</p><p>Figs 39–42, Tabs 2–3</p><p>Trichogaster pallida Salmon, 1951 (in Salmon 1951a)</p><p>Setogaster pallidus (Salmon, 1951) (according to Salmon 1951b)</p><p>Lepidocyrtus pallidus (Salmon, 1951) comb. nov., non Lepidocyrtus pallidus Reuter, 1890 [homonymy]</p><p>Material examined. Holotype (J. T. Salmon Coll. Nº 34), SINGAPORE, McRitchie Reservoir, 1.330470N 103.829505E, 37m asl, 22.x.1949, among fibrous roots and dead vegetation, M.W.F. Tweedie. Te Papa Museum, Wellington, New Zealand.</p><p>Description. Body length (without head and furca) 1.95 mm. Mesothorax slightly projecting over the head. Blue pigment present on antenna and pale blue dispersed on head, thorax, abdomen and legs (but see original description in Salmon 1951a); densely black pigmented ocular areas. 8+8 ommatidia, with G and H reduced.</p><p>Antenna with scales. Antennal chaetotaxy not visible; without apical bulb.</p><p>Prelabral chaetae smooth. Labial chaetae M1 and R ciliated and shorter than other chaetae, other chaetae smooth (labial formula M1*m2R*el1l2).Ventral cephalic groove with 3+3 ciliated chaetae.</p><p>Dorsal macrochaetae formula such as AoA2s A2A3A4/00/0?00+2; dorsal cephalic macrochaetae as in Fig. 39. Th.II–III without macrochaetae (micro/mesochaetae chaetotaxy not visible). Abd.I–II–III dorsal chaetotaxy not visible. Abd.III without a lateral tuft of filaments. Abd.IV chaetotaxy partially visible; B5, B6, D3, E2, E3, E4, F1, F2 and F3 broad macrochaetae; T6, T7 and Fe4 thin macrochaetae; bothriotrichumT2 without accessory chaeta s; chaetae a, m and D1 detached and only their insertions seen; C1 mesochaeta; without lateral pseudopori.</p><p>Ventral tube chaetotaxy and scale covering not visible. Legs with scales. Unguis with a basal pair of teeth at 32% of the inner edge, and with one inner tooth at 60% from base of inner edge; unguiculus acuminate and with serrate outer margin; spatulate tibiotarsal tenent hair.</p><p>Manubrium with scales on dorsal surface. Dental basal tubercle pointed and well developed (Figs 40 and 41). Mucronal basal spine with spinelet (Fig. 42).</p><p>Discussion. It was not possible to describe more details of the chaetotaxy of this specimen because of the state of the slide, but the presence of a well-developed and pointed dental tubercle permit to assign the specimen to the subgenus Acrocyrtus . After transfer of Trichogaster pallida Salmon to Lepidocyrtus genus, Lepidocyrtus pallidus (Salmon, 1951) comb.nov., the specific name ' pallidus ' is homonymic with Lepidocyrtus pallidus Reuter, 1890 . For this reason a new name is needed for the species transferred and Lepidocyrtus postpallidus nom. nov. is proposed for Salmon's species. Moreover, this species belongs to subgenus Acrocyrtus then the complete name of this species is Lepidocyrtus (Acrocyrtus) postpallidus (Salmon, 1951) .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F787EFE010FFE8119CFAF10CE0FDB4	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Mateos, Eduardo;Greenslade, Penelope	Mateos, Eduardo, Greenslade, Penelope (2015): Towards understanding Lepidocyrtus Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) I: diagnosis of the subgenus Setogaster, new records and redescriptions of species. Zootaxa 4044 (1): 105-129, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4044.1.6
03F787EFE013FFF6119CFAB20C6CFD9E.text	03F787EFE013FFF6119CFAB20C6CFD9E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lepidocyrtus (Setogaster) kuakea Christiansen & Bellinger 1992	<div><p>Lepidocyrtus (Setogaster) kuakea Christiansen &amp; Bellinger, 1992 comb. nov.</p><p>Figs 4 and 43–48, Tabs 2–3</p><p>Material examined. One paratype on slide (code 6793). HAWAIIAN ISLANDS, Maui, Iao Valley State Park, 20.880864N 156.544622W, 284 m asl, 2.vii.1982, K. Christiansen, deposited at SAM.</p><p>Description. Body length (without head and furca) 0.45 mm. Mesothorax not projecting over the head. Body color yellow to mottled with blue, with pale blue on ant-II-III-IV and eye patches, and dark pigmented eyes and internal spot (Fig. 4). Body dorsoventrally compressed. Antenna, legs, ventral tube and dorsal region of the furca without scales. Basis of ant.I dorsally and ventrally with three microchaetae arranged in triangle. Ant.III organ composed of two subcylindrical sensory rods partially covered by integumentary fold. Ant.IV with small subapical T-chaeta; without apical bulb.</p><p>Ciliated prelabral chaetae and smooth labral chaetae in typical number of 4/5,5,4; chaetae of apical row thicker than those in other rows. Closed inverted V-shaped labral apical intrusion. Lateral process ( sensu Fjellberg 1999) of outer labial papilla short, tip not reaching apex of papilla.</p><p>Dorsal macrochaetae formula such as AoA2s A2A4M 2/00/01 *00+3, with A4 as smooth short macrochaeta (Fig. 43). Eyes and interocular chaetotaxy not seen (complete area darkly pigmented). Th.II–III and abd.I dorsal chaetotaxy the same as for S. nigrofasciatus (see Figs 19–21). Abd.II chaetotaxy as in Fig. 44; chaetae ml and a2p absent; chaeta a2 smooth mesochaeta; chaeta m3 short, ciliated macrochaeta (chaeta marked with * in the dorsal macrochaetal formula); m5 mesochaeta. Abd.III chaetotaxy as in Fig. 45; chaeta d3 absent; chaetae mi, ml, a2, li, lm, ll, a6, im, em fan-shaped, of which a6 and li larger (paddle-like); chaeta am6 strongly ciliated and thicker than other tergital mesochaetae; without lateral tuft of filaments. Abd.IV chaetotaxy as in Fig. 46; bothriotrichumT2 without accessory chaeta s; chaetae m, D1, pi and pe fan-shaped, of which m and D1 larger (paddle-like); chaeta a bilobed-fan-shaped (see Fig. 26); C1 mesochaeta; F2 and F3 smooth mesochaetae, with F3 double in length than F2; macrochaeta B6 with socket of minor diameter than macrochaetae B4 and B5; with at least two dorsal long Schaetae (region not clear on slide), with two lateral pseudopori located externally to chaetae r4–r5.</p><p>Trochanteral organ, unguis (Fig. 47), ventral tube, and furca as original description (see Christiansen &amp; Bellinger 1992), except for presence of spinelet in the basal mucronal spine (Fig. 48); dentes with a little (difficult to observe) rounded basal tubercle.</p><p>Discussion. The presence of small rounded dental tubercle and spinelet on basal mucronal spine allow us to assign this specimen to the subgenus Setogaster. In the original description of the species Christiansen &amp; Bellinger (1992) described the mucronal basal spine without spinelet, but it was a misinterpretation of the holotype (Christiansen pers com) and the spinelet is clearly present.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F787EFE013FFF6119CFAB20C6CFD9E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Mateos, Eduardo;Greenslade, Penelope	Mateos, Eduardo, Greenslade, Penelope (2015): Towards understanding Lepidocyrtus Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) I: diagnosis of the subgenus Setogaster, new records and redescriptions of species. Zootaxa 4044 (1): 105-129, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4044.1.6
03F787EFE00DFFF7119CF9580D65FD0D.text	03F787EFE00DFFF7119CF9580D65FD0D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lepidocyrtus (Setogaster) Setogaster	<div><p>Lepidocyrtus (Setogaster) spp.</p><p>Figs 7–8, 49, Tabs 2–3</p><p>Diagnosis. Body of moderate size with mesothorax not projecting over head (Figs 7–8); without scales on antennae, legs, ventral tube and dorsal face of the manubrium; ant.IV with a subapical T-chaeta; ciliated prelabral chaetae; labial anterior row formed by five smooth chaetae (a1–a5); posterior row formed by smooth or ciliated chaetae (depending on the specimen); ventral cephalic area with 3+3 ciliated chaetae along cephalic groove; dorsal cephalic chaetae A3 mesochaeta, A4 mesochaeta or macrochaeta depending on specimen; thorax without dorsal macrochaetae; abd.II chaeta a2p absent, chaeta m3 short ciliated macrochaeta, chaeta m5 mesochaeta; abd.III chaetae li and a6 paddle-like (see Fig. 23), several specimens with lateral tuft of long ciliated filaments (see Fig. 24); abd.IV chaeta C1 mesochaeta, B4–5–6 ciliated macrochaetae, chaetae m, D1, pi and pe fan-shaped, from which m and D1 larger and paddle-like (see Fig. 26), chaeta a bilobed-fan-shaped (see Fig. 26), with two lateral pseudopori located externally to mesochaetae r4–r5; dentes with short rounded dental tubercle (or without); basal mucronal spine with spinelet.</p><p>Material examined. 44 specimens belonging to several species, mounted on slides and deposited at SAM (slide codes SAM 0004, SAM 005, SAM 0007, SAM 008, SAM 009, SAM 010, SAM 011, SAM 012, SAM 013, SAM 014, SAM 015, SAM 016, SAM 017, SAM 019, SAM 020, SAM 022, SAM 023, SAM 024, SAM 025, SAM 026, SAM 027, SAM 028, SAM 029) and University of Barcelona (samples LP307, LP308, LP310, LP312, LP322, LP338, LP340) from a wide range of localities and regions of Australia (Fig. 49) (wheat and cotton fields, native grass, mountain tops, forest, a cave (NSW), reservoir (VIC), garden (ACT).</p><p>Discussion. This group of specimens belong to several different species currently being studied. The presence of small rounded dental tubercle and spinelet on the basal mucronal spine mean that all these specimens can be assigned to the subgenus Setogaster.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F787EFE00DFFF7119CF9580D65FD0D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Mateos, Eduardo;Greenslade, Penelope	Mateos, Eduardo, Greenslade, Penelope (2015): Towards understanding Lepidocyrtus Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) I: diagnosis of the subgenus Setogaster, new records and redescriptions of species. Zootaxa 4044 (1): 105-129, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4044.1.6
03F787EFE00CFFF7119CFC260A2DFB51.text	03F787EFE00CFFF7119CFC260A2DFB51.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lepidocyrtus (Lanocyrtus) fimetarius Gisin 1964	<div><p>Lepidocyrtus (Lanocyrtus) fimetarius Gisin, 1964</p><p>Material examined. NEW SOUTH WALES. Three specimens, Auscott Warren, cotton fields, 31.47S 147.46E, 173 m asl, 6.iii–13.iv.1994 and 24.ii–6.iii.1994, J.Lytton Hitchens (slide codes SAM 017 and SAM 023); one specimen, Sydney Markets, on Pleurotus fungus for sale, 33.887399S 151.229992E, 24 m asl, 29.iv.1998, C. Grigurinovic (slide code SAM 018); one specimen, Jenolan Caves, Paradox Cave, 33.816665S 150.016690E, 829 m asl, 4.iv.1984, G. Smitt, E. Holland (slide code SAM 021); WESTERN AUSTRALIA. One specimen, Perth, 31.942163S 115.761490E, 14 m asl, 26.iii.1931, H.Womersley (slide code SAM 032). Introduced in Australia.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F787EFE00CFFF7119CFC260A2DFB51	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Mateos, Eduardo;Greenslade, Penelope	Mateos, Eduardo, Greenslade, Penelope (2015): Towards understanding Lepidocyrtus Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) I: diagnosis of the subgenus Setogaster, new records and redescriptions of species. Zootaxa 4044 (1): 105-129, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4044.1.6
03F787EFE00CFFF7119CFD340E25FCF6.text	03F787EFE00CFFF7119CFD340E25FCF6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lepidocyrtus (Lanocyrtus) pallidus Reuter 1890	<div><p>Lepidocyrtus (Lanocyrtus) pallidus Reuter, 1890</p><p>Material examined. ANTARCTICA. Two specimens deposited at SAM, Davis Station, hydroponics, 28.xii.1986, 68.576395S 77.968901E, 2 m asl, J.Ferris (slide codes SAM 101 and SAM 102). Introduced to the Australian Antarctic Territory.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F787EFE00CFFF7119CFD340E25FCF6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Mateos, Eduardo;Greenslade, Penelope	Mateos, Eduardo, Greenslade, Penelope (2015): Towards understanding Lepidocyrtus Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) I: diagnosis of the subgenus Setogaster, new records and redescriptions of species. Zootaxa 4044 (1): 105-129, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4044.1.6
03F787EFE00CFFF7119CFACF0B26FA26.text	03F787EFE00CFFF7119CFACF0B26FA26.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lepidocyrtus (Lepidocyrtus) violaceus (Geoffroy 1762) Geoffroy 1762	<div><p>Lepidocyrtus (Lepidocyrtus) violaceus (Geoffroy, 1762)</p><p>Material examined. 4 specimens, Macquarie Island, Lusitania Bay, Green Gorge, 54.564139S 158.902500E, 160 m asl, December/ January 1986, P. Greenslade (sample LP285). Introduced to Australia.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F787EFE00CFFF7119CFACF0B26FA26	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Mateos, Eduardo;Greenslade, Penelope	Mateos, Eduardo, Greenslade, Penelope (2015): Towards understanding Lepidocyrtus Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) I: diagnosis of the subgenus Setogaster, new records and redescriptions of species. Zootaxa 4044 (1): 105-129, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4044.1.6
03F787EFE009FFF3119CFBBC0A38FDE9.text	03F787EFE009FFF3119CFBBC0A38FDE9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lepidocyrtus (Setogaster) Salmon 1951	<div><p>Lepidocyrtus (Setogaster) Salmon, 1951</p><p>Type species: Trichogaster bispinosus Handschin, 1932</p><p>Type locality: Indonesia, West Java, Tjibodas, Quellen bei Kandang Badak, 2400 m ii–vii.1929. = Merapicyrtus Yoshii &amp;Suhardjono, 1992 syn. nov.</p><p>Diagnosis. Body of moderate size with mesothorax not projecting over the head ( L. merapicus is of large size and has mesothorax projected over head); without scales on antennae, legs, ventral tube and dorsal face of manubrium; ant.IV with subapical T-chaeta; ventral cephalic with 3+3 ciliated chaetae along cephalic groove; dorsal cephalic chaetae A3 mesochaeta, A4 mesochaeta or macrochaeta depending on species; abd.II chaeta a2p absent, chaeta m3 short ciliated macrochaeta, chaeta m5 mesochaeta; abd.III with lateral tuft of long ciliated filaments (not present during all life stages); abd.IV chaeta C1 mesochaeta, B4–5–6 ciliated macrochaetae, chaeta a bilobed fan-shaped, chaetae m and D1 paddle-like fan-shaped, with two lateral pseudopori located externally to mesochaetae r3–r4–r5, ratio T2-T4/C1p&lt;4 (see Table 2); dentes with short rounded dental tubercle (or without); basal mucronal spine with spinelet.</p><p>Species allocation. The study of the type series of Lepidocyrtus nigrofasciatus, several specimens identified as Lepidocyrtus praecisus by Womersley, and the three (Salmon 1951) Trichogaster holotypes from Singapore reveals that L. nigrofasciatus, L. praecisus, T. fasciata and T. coerulea show the characters defining Setogaster (rounded dental tubercle, and mucronal basal spine with spinelet), while T. pallida has a well-developed and pointed dental tubercle, a character defining Acrocyrtus . Also the study of the Lepidocyrtus kuakea paratype has allowed us to verify that this species has spinelet in the basal mucronal spine. As a result, from the list of currently recognised species within the subgenus Setogaster (see Bellinger et al. 1996–2015), the species Lepidocyrtus (Setogaster) pallida must be removed (because it belongs to subgenus Acrocyrtus), and the species L. (S.) kuakea, L. (S.) nigrofasciatus, and L. (S.) praecisus must be added. Species of subgenus Cinctocyrtus (by definition) have no spinelet in basal mucronal spine, and the following species (listed in Bellinger et al. 1996–2015) Lepidocyrtus (Cinctocyrtus) cinctus, filamentosus and sandakanicus have the spinelet (see Yoshii 1982, Yoshii &amp; Suhardjono, 1989), so following the Wang et al. (2003) criterion, they must now be placed in Setogaster also. Baquero et al. (2015) described the new species Lepidocyrtus (Cinctocyrtus) kulluensis from Indian Himalaya region. But in our opinion, following Wang et al. (2003), this species has to be ascribed to Setogaster subgenus (not to Cinctocyrtus), because of the presence of a small rounded dental tubercle and a spinelet in mucronal basal spine. Other characters of this new species seems to be the same as for Setogaster subgenus as it is described in the present paper. But some important chaetotaxic characters are not properly described in the Baquero et al. paper, specially body dorsal chaetotaxy. This chaetotaxy needs to be redescribed prior to be sure about the proper affinity of Lepidocyrtus kulluensis .</p><p>Distribution. Indonesia (Borneo, Java, Moluccas), Singapore, Malaysia, India, Hawaii, Australia.</p><p>Remarks. Merapicyrtus was erected on a single character, a lamella on the mucro (Yoshii &amp; Suhardjono 1992b), but it had been previously described as possessing two spines in this position (Yoshii &amp; Suhardjono 1989). We consider the original description was correct, especially after Yoshii’s (1994) publication where he added a note to the already published paper stating that the mucronal lamella was an artifact, hence the synonym made here.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F787EFE009FFF3119CFBBC0A38FDE9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Mateos, Eduardo;Greenslade, Penelope	Mateos, Eduardo, Greenslade, Penelope (2015): Towards understanding Lepidocyrtus Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) I: diagnosis of the subgenus Setogaster, new records and redescriptions of species. Zootaxa 4044 (1): 105-129, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4044.1.6
03F787EFE008FFF0119CFD190DF7FC2C.text	03F787EFE008FFF0119CFD190DF7FC2C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lepidocyrtus (Carocyrtus) Yoshii & Suhardjono 1989	<div><p>Lepidocyrtus (Carocyrtus) Yoshii &amp; Suhardjono, 1989</p><p>Lepidocyrtus (Carocyrtus) ralumensis Schäffer, 1898</p><p>This species was described from New Britain (now Papua New Guinea). Assuming that the L. ralumensis descriptions given by Yosii (1960) and Yoshii &amp; Suhardjono (1992a) are correct, then this species belongs to the subgenus Carocyrtus . The specimens deposited at SAM and identified as L. ralumensis by Womersley have characters of Setogaster so there is currently no evidence that L. ralumensis is presentin Australia. Distribution. Indonesia, Solomon Islands.</p><p>Lepidocyrtus (Lanocyrtus) Yoshii &amp; Suhardjono, 1989</p><p>Lepidocyrtus (Lanocyrtus) cyaneus Tullberg, 1871</p><p>An original incorrect identification made by Greenslade &amp; Wise (1986) was later corrected to Lepidocyrtus violaceus (Geoffroy, 1762) (Greenslade 2006, 2007–2015). Specimens identified by Womersley in 1934 (slide SAM007) as L. cyaneus are Setogaster so there is currently no evidence that L. cyaneus is present in Australia. Distribution. Holarctic.</p><p>Lepidocyrtus (Lanocyrtus) fimetarius Gisin, 1964</p><p>The record of this species in Greenslade &amp; Ireson (1986), Greenslade (1994, 2007–2015) is correct.</p><p>New records. Cotton fields (Auscott Warren), Jenolan caves, mushrooms ( Pleurotus sp. from Sydney Market). Distribution. Europe (Albania, France, Germany, Portugal, Spain, Sweden). Introduced in Australia.</p><p>Lepidocyrtus (Lanocyrtus) pallidus Reuter, 1890</p><p>New records. Antarctica, in hydroponics, Davis Station, 28.xii.1986, J. Ferris. Distribution. Cosmopolitan. Introduced to the Australian Antarctic Territory.</p><p>Lepidocyrtus (Lepidocyrtus) Bourlet, 1839</p><p>Lepidocyrtus (Lepidocyrtus) violaceus (Geoffroy, 1762) Specimens deposited at SAM and originally incorrectly identified as L. lignorum and L. cyaneus . The corrected identification was published in Greenslade (2006, 2007–2015).</p><p>Distribution. Holarctic. Introduced to Australia.</p><p>Lepidocyrtus (Setogaster) Salmon, 1951</p><p>Lepidocyrtus (Setogaster) nigrofasciatus Womersley, 1934</p><p>Lepidocyrtus (Setogaster) nigrofasciatus nigrofasciatus Womersley, 1934</p><p>Lepidocyrtus (Setogaster) nigrofasciatus aureus Womersley, 1934 syn. nov. Distribution. South Australia, Adelaide, Mt Lofty Ranges; Victoria, Dandenong Ranges, Yarra Ranges.</p><p>Lepidocyrtus (Setogaster) praecisus Schött, 1917 Lepidocyrtus praecisus Schött, 1917</p><p>Distribution. Queensland, Ravenshoe; South Australia, Mt Lofty Ranges, Kangaroo Island; Victoria, You Yang Mts; Western Australia, Perth.</p><p>Lepidocyrtus (Setogaster) spp.</p><p>Records of several species under study (Fig. 49): several localities at the states of South Australia, New South Wales, Victoria, and Australian Capital Territory.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F787EFE008FFF0119CFD190DF7FC2C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Mateos, Eduardo;Greenslade, Penelope	Mateos, Eduardo, Greenslade, Penelope (2015): Towards understanding Lepidocyrtus Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) I: diagnosis of the subgenus Setogaster, new records and redescriptions of species. Zootaxa 4044 (1): 105-129, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4044.1.6
