identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03EC1961FFFA2800B16EFD41FE5BFCF8.text	03EC1961FFFA2800B16EFD41FE5BFCF8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Noxnympha Nascimento & Santos-Silva & Barclay 2019	<div><p>Noxnympha gen. nov.</p><p>LAMIINAE Latreille ACANTHODERINI Thomson</p><p>Type species</p><p>Noxnympha eris sp. nov., monotypy, present designation.</p><p>Etymology</p><p>Latin: ‘nox’, night; ‘nympha’, minor deities of the forests, rivers, etc. (i.e. the nymph of the night). Feminine gender.</p><p>Description</p><p>Small size. Body slightly flattened, pubescent. Head hypognathous; frons transverse; antennal tubercles moderately elevated with rounded apex; maxillary palpi slightly longer than labial palpi; last maxillary and labial palpomeres fusiform; mandibles about as long as 3/4 of frons width, moderately curved, triangularly excavated on basal half of outer side; genae distinctly shorter than length of lower eye lobe. Eyes coarsely faceted; area of connection of ocular lobes not strongly narrow, with about four rows of ommatidia; distance between upper eye lobes slightly larger than width of one upper lobe. Antennae 11-segmented, longer than body; scape elongate, sub-fusiform; antennomeres filiform, length gradually smaller towards XI; antennomere III longer than scape. Prothorax distinctly wider than long; sides with large, rounded tubercle. Pronotum with two large, very elevated plate-shaped tubercles on each side of central area; with row of coarse, deep punctures near anterior and posterior margins. Prosternum centrally notably narrower than width of prosternal process. Prosternal process gradually widened towards apex; maximum width about 3/4 of procoxal cavity diameter. Procoxal cavities closed posteriorly. Mesoventral process without tubercle; wide, gradually narrowed towards apex; posterior width about 3/4 of mesocoxal cavity diameter. Scutellum gradually narrowed towards rounded apex. Elytra gradually narrowed from humerus to apex; posterior width smaller than half of humeral width; humeral width about 1.6 times posterior prothoracic width; with large, elevated, longitudinal carina at centre of basal fifth; apex truncate, with outer angle slightly projected; coarsely punctate; with moderately long and sparse, erect dark setae. Femora pedunculate-clavate. Mesotibiae obliquely sulcate dorsally at distal half. Metatarsomere I slightly shorter than II and III together. Abdominal ventrite I longer than II, III and IV, shorter than V; ventrite V longitudinally sulcate centrally on basal half; apex truncate.</p><p>Remarks</p><p>Noxnympha gen. nov. differs from Cosmotomidius (Figure 1 (e – h)) as follows: body stout; humeral width about 1.6 times posterior prothoracic width; the lateral tubercles of prothorax are distinctly rounded; outer elytral apex slightly projected. In Cosmotomidius, the body is slender, humeral width is about 1.4 times posterior prothoracic width (except in C. egregius), lateral tubercles of prothorax spiniform, and outer elytral apex with long spine. It differs from Zikanita (Figures 3 (a – g), 4(a – f)) by the rounded lateral tubercles of prothorax (spiniform in Zikanita), pronotum without dark sub-reniform pubescent maculae (presents in Zikanita), and body without very long and white setae (present in Zikanita). Noxnympha gen. nov. also somewhat resembles species of Anoreina Bates, 1861, Pyrianoreina Martins and Galileo, 2008, and Trichoanoreina Julio and Monné, 2005, but differs in particular by the presence of strong pronotal tubercles (absent in these genera), and by the basal elytral carina strongly elevated (not or slightly elevated in these genera).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EC1961FFFA2800B16EFD41FE5BFCF8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Nascimento, Francisco E. de L.;Santos-Silva, Antonio;Barclay, Maxwell V. L.	Nascimento, Francisco E. de L., Santos-Silva, Antonio, Barclay, Maxwell V. L. (2019): On the tribal allocation of Cosmotomidius Melzerı 1931 ı descriptions of new taxa of Acanthoderini and notes on some tribes of Lamiinae (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Journal of Natural History 53 (11): 705-723, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2019.1606356
03EC1961FFFB2805B298FCBAFE60FDFF.text	03EC1961FFFB2805B298FCBAFE60FDFF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Noxnympha eris Nascimento & Santos-Silva & Barclay 2019	<div><p>Noxnympha eris sp. nov.</p><p>(Figure 1 (a – d))</p><p>Description</p><p>Female. Integument black except dark reddish brown on distal half of labrum, and narrow yellowish-brown apex of abdominal ventrites I – IV.</p><p>Head. Frons minutely, densely, shallowly punctate except nearly smooth narrow central area on each side of median groove; with yellowish-brown pubescence not obscuring integument; with a few long, erect, dark setae close to lower eye lobes. Area between antennal tubercles with sculpturing and pubescence as on frons. Remaining surface of vertex minutely, sparsely punctate; with yellowish-brown pubescence, shorter than on frons, not obscuring integument. Area behind upper eye lobes minutely, densely punctate, with yellowish-brown pubescence not obscuring integument; area behind lower eye lobes with band of yellowish-brown pubescence close to eye, glabrous on remaining surface. Antennal tubercles with sculpturing and pubescence as on frons. Median groove well marked from clypeus to prothoracic margin. Genae densely, microscopically punctate except smooth distal area; with sparse, decumbent yellowish-brown setae except glabrous distal area. Gulamentum smooth, glabrous except narrow area close to mentum with moderately sparse, short yellowish-white setae. Postclypeus nearly horizontal close to frons, abruptly inclined towards anteclypeus; area close to clypeus glabrous centrally, with yellowish-brown pubescence on each side of central area, glabrous laterally; area close to anteclypeus with yellowish-brown pubescence throughout; with a long, erect, dark, thick seta on each side of margin between horizontal and inclined areas. Labrum coplanar with anteclypeus at posterior third, inclined at remaining surface; with long, erect, thick dark setae on posterior third and laterally; with fringe of yellow setae at anterior margin. Distance between upper eye lobes 0.29 times length of scape; in frontal view, distance between lower eye lobes 0.85 times length of scape. Antennae 1.9 times elytral length, reaching elytral apex at base of antennomere VIII; scape with yellowish-brown pubescence partially obscuring integument, ventrally with sparse, erect dark setae interspersed; antennomere III with yellowish-white pubescence on basal third, gradually yellowish brown towards apex (left antennomere with small golden pubescent spots on distal half; antennomere IV with yellowish-white pubescence on basal 2/3, gradually yellowish brown on distal third; antennomeres V – XI with yellowish-white pubescence at about basal half, gradually yellowish brown towards apex; antennomeres III – VII with sparse, erect, thick dark setae ventrally (shorter and sparser towards VII); antennal formula (ratio) based on length of antennomere III: scape = 0.81; pedicel = 0.13; IV = 1.07; V = 0.69; VI = 0.59; VII = 0.56; VIII = 0.52; IX = 0.46; X = 0.44; XI = 0.47.</p><p>Thorax. Prothorax 1.65 times wider than long. Tubercles of pronotum with top obliquely inclined; central area with row of moderately fine punctures, convergent from base to apex; with yellowish-brown pubescence not obscuring integument, more conspicuous laterally, except nearly glabrous apex of tubercles. Sides of prothorax with row of coarse punctures basally and distally (following those of pronotum), not reaching prosternum; with yellowishbrown pubescence partially obscuring integument (more golden depending on angle of light source). Prosternum narrow, with yellowish-brown pubescence not obscuring integument (more golden depending on angle of light source); prosternal process with narrowest area about half width of procoxal cavity; centrally widely, distinctly depressed; with yellowish-brown pubescence not obscuring integument (more golden depending on angle of light source). Central area of mesoventrite with short, sparse yellowish-brown pubescence; remaining surface of mesoventrite, mesanepisternum, mesepimeron, metanepisternum and metaventrite with yellowish-brown pubescence partially obscuring integument (less so centrally on metaventrite). Mesoventral process centrally emarginate at apex, with short tab projected laterally under mesocoxae; surface nearly flat. Scutellum somewhat depressed centrally; with yellowish-brown pubescence not obscuring integument.</p><p>Elytra. Coarsely, moderately abundantly punctate on anterior third, gradually sparser towards apex; with large, elevated carina on centre of anterior quarter, gradually less elevated towards its apex; area between carina and anterior area on each side near humerus with golden pubescence not obscuring integument; remaining surface with yellowish-white pubescence (more greyish white or golden depending on angle of light source), interspersed with glabrous or nearly glabrous, irregular areas; apex wide, slightly sinuous.</p><p>Legs. Femora with yellowish-brown pubescence partially obscuring integument. Tibiae with yellowish-brown pubescence basally, wide central area with yellowish-white pubescence, with dark abundant, nearly decumbent, thick setae distally; with long, erect, thick, dark setae dorsally.</p><p>Abdomen. Ventrites with yellowish-brown pubescence abundant, but not obscuring integument.</p><p>Dimensions (holotype female). Total length, 9.50; prothoracic length, 1.80; posterior prothoracic width, 2.60; anterior prothoracic width, 2.20; maximum prothoracic width (between apices of lateral tubercles), 2.95; humeral width, 4.05; elytral length, 6.80.</p><p>Type material. Holotype female from BRAZIL, Espírito Santo: Linhares, November 1972, coll. P. C. Elias (MZSP).</p><p>Etymology. The specific epithet ‘Eris’ is a noun in apposition and refers to the Greek goddess of strife and discord.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EC1961FFFB2805B298FCBAFE60FDFF	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Nascimento, Francisco E. de L.;Santos-Silva, Antonio;Barclay, Maxwell V. L.	Nascimento, Francisco E. de L., Santos-Silva, Antonio, Barclay, Maxwell V. L. (2019): On the tribal allocation of Cosmotomidius Melzerı 1931 ı descriptions of new taxa of Acanthoderini and notes on some tribes of Lamiinae (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Journal of Natural History 53 (11): 705-723, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2019.1606356
03EC1961FFFE2804B23EFD49FC5CFD87.text	03EC1961FFFE2804B23EFD49FC5CFD87.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cosmotomidius setosus (Audinet-Serville 1835)	<div><p>On Cosmotomidius setosus (Audinet-Serville, 1835)</p><p>Pogonocherus setosus Audinet-Serville, 1835: 58 . Cosmotomidius setosus; Monné, 2018: 844 (cat.). (Figures 1 (e – h), 5(a – d))</p><p>Audinet-Serville (1835) described Pogonocherus setosus, without indicating the type locality (he just reported ‘ exotic ’). However, the publication (Audinet-Serville 1835) recorded: ‘ * Pogonocherus setosus, DEJ. Collect. ’ The asterisk is explained in an earlier work, Audinet-Serville (1832) (translated): ‘ The new genera, as well as new species, will be indicated by an asterisk ’. We believe that Audinet-Serville (1835) was indicating the specimens labelled in the Dejean collection. This appears evident when we see, for example, the original description of Hemiloplius dimidiaticornis: ‘ Hemilophus dimidiaticornis . – Saperda dimidiaticornis, Dej. Collect. ’ (described as H. dimidiaticornis by Audinet- Serville, and present in Dejean collection as S. dimidiaticornis).</p><p>Dejean (1835, p. 339) listed Exocentrus setosus as being from ‘ Brasilia ’. This is another evident indication that Audinet-Serville examined the Dejean collection, since according to the Bishop Museum (2015), pages 1 – 195 of volume 4(1) of the Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (including Serville ’ s paper) were published before June 1835, while according to Bousquet and Bouchard (2013) pages 257 – 360 of the Dejean catalogue were published on 22 August 1835.</p><p>Although the species appears in the Dejean catalogue (1835) as ‘Exocentrus’, the label of the specimen indicates that ‘Pogonocherus’ was changed to ‘Exocentrus’ (Figure 5 (b)). Apparently, when Audinet-Serville examined the specimen in Dejean collection it was labelled as ‘ Pogonocherus’. A specimen (Figure 5 (a,b) from Dejean collection, currently deposited in the BMNH (former Louis A.A. Chevrolat collection) is a syntype of Pogonocherus setosus (ICZN 1999: Article 72.4.1.1). There is another specimen (Figure 5 (c,d)) in the BMNH from the Alexander Fry collection (previously in the La Ferté-Sénectère and Dejean collections). However, it is not possible to know whether this specimen was in the Dejean collection at the time that Audinet-Serville examined it. Thus, it is cannot with certainty be considered a syntype.</p><p>Audinet-Serville (1835) mentions, as well as material in the Dejean collection, a specimen of P. setosus in his private collection, but this could not be found.</p><p>As the species is the type species of Cosmotomidius, it is important to designate a lectotype, and we accordingly here designate the syntype from the former Dejean collection, the only specimen that can be traced that is certainly a syntype, as lectotype of the species. The lectotype (Figure 5 (a)) has the following labels (Figure 5 (b)):</p><p>(1) Green [handwritten]: Lacordaire;</p><p>(2) White [printed]: Bowr. Chevr. 63.47*;</p><p>(3) Green [handwritten]: Pogonocherus [cancelled]/ Exocentrus setosus mihi/h. in Brasilia;</p><p>(4) Red [printed]: Probable Syntype /det. MVL Barclay 2018;</p><p>(5) White [printed]: NHMUK 011222569.</p><p>Therefore, the type locality of Pogonocherus setosus becomes ‘ Brazil ’.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EC1961FFFE2804B23EFD49FC5CFD87	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Nascimento, Francisco E. de L.;Santos-Silva, Antonio;Barclay, Maxwell V. L.	Nascimento, Francisco E. de L., Santos-Silva, Antonio, Barclay, Maxwell V. L. (2019): On the tribal allocation of Cosmotomidius Melzerı 1931 ı descriptions of new taxa of Acanthoderini and notes on some tribes of Lamiinae (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Journal of Natural History 53 (11): 705-723, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2019.1606356
03EC1961FFF1280EB29EFC7DFBF5FEF0.text	03EC1961FFF1280EB29EFC7DFBF5FEF0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Zikanita Lane 1943	<div><p>On Zikanita Lane, 1943</p><p>(Figures 2 (a – d), 3(a – g), 4(a – f))</p><p>Zikanita Lane, 1943: 261; Monné, 2018: 310 (cat.).</p><p>According to Lane (1943, p. 261) on Zikanita (translated): ‘ Very close to Cosmotomidius Melzer, 1931, from which differs as follows: 1) scape and antennomere IV subequal in length, the antennomere III the longest; 2) mesoventral process with a conspicuous, rounded tubercle ’. However, in the description of Z. perpulchra, Lane (1943, p. 264) pointed out (translated):</p><p>The specimen [paratype] from Santo Amaro shows signs of precarious [sic] development; the discal tubercles of the pronotum, the elytral carinae, and the tubercle of the mesoventral process are poorly developed; the antennomere III of the antennae is subequal in length to the scape and to the antennomere IV.</p><p>This specimen is considered by us to belong to a different species. Furthermore, the existence of a specimen that does not agree with the generic description of Zikanita makes it controversial.</p><p>Machado and Monné (2009, p. 332) reported:</p><p>Cosmotomidius is similar to Zikanita Lane, 1943 in respect to the presence of abundant long hairs covering the body, pronotum with median tubercles, sides of prothorax with tubercles, and elytra with a median crista near the base. Cosmotomidius differs from Zikanita by the pronotum with a row of coarse punctures on the posterior and anterior margins, the mesosternal process without tubercles, and the elytra with black suberect setae. In Zikanita [ Z. perpulchra Lane, 1943] the pronotum has moderately coarse and sparse punctures, but they are organized in a row only on the posterior margin; the mesosternal process has tubercles; and the elytra lack black suberect setae.</p><p>According to Touroult et al. (2010, p. 193), who transferred Cosmotomidius to Pogonocherini (translated): ‘ The original diagnosis of the genus Zikanita indicates two precise criteria of identification (Lane 1943, p. 261): scape and antennomere IV subequal, III the longest, and mesoventral process provide with a rounded and conspicuous tubercle, which make it possible to distinguish it from the close genus Cosmotomidius Melzer, 1931 ’; and ‘ As observed by Lane (1943) and Machado and Monné (2009), Cosmotomidius is close to Zikanita, which we maintain for the moment in the tribe Acanthoderini . The differences are in the mesoventral process (tuberculate in Zikanita) and the ratio between antennomere III and IV (III longer or subequal to IV in Zikanita) ’ (Touroult et al. 2010, p. 194). However, as pointed out by Machado and Monné (2011), and also in the original description of the genus, these two features are variable in Zikanita . For example, the tubercle of the mesoventral process is absent in Z. argenteofasciata (Figure 2 (c,d)) (Tippmann 1960), nearly absent in Z. biocellata (Tippmann, 1960) (Figure 2 (a,b)), slightly elevated in the new species described here, and extremely elevated in Z. perpulchra (Lane, 1943) .</p><p>Later, Machado and Monné (2011, p. 67) reported:</p><p>Zikanita differs from Cosmotomidius in total length, which reaches almost 20 mm, the elytra are 1.6 × wider than the prothorax at the base and the antennae are longer, exceeding the elytral apices at antennomere VII in males and VIII in females. In Cosmotomidius (Machado and Monné, 2009, Figs 2, 5) the total length does not exceed 14 mm, the elytra are 1.4 × wider than the prothorax at the base and the antennae exceed the elytral apices at antennomere VIII or IX in males and IX or X in females.</p><p>In the key to species of Zikanita, Machado and Monné (2011, p. 67) clearly contradicted</p><p>Lane (1943), Machado and Monné (2009) and Touroult et al. (2010):</p><p>‘ 1. Intercoxal process of mesosternum tuberculate.. .... ……………………… 2</p><p>-Intercoxal process of mesosternum planar.. .. ………………………………… 3 ’</p><p>To summarise, following Machado and Monné (2011), Zikanita differs from Cosmotomidius, but not by the features pointed out in the original description, or by Machado and Monné (2009) and Touroult et al. (2010).</p><p>Actually, the antennae in males of Cosmotomidius reach the elytral apex before the apex of the antennomere VI ( C. setosus, C. nigrisetosus Touroult et al., 2010, C. morvanae Touroult et al., 2010, C. vincus Machado and Monné, 2009) or before the apex of antennomere V ( C. egregius (Martins and Galileo, 2007)) . In females of Cosmotomidius ( C. setosus), the antennae reach the elytral apex at the base of antennomere VII. In males of Zikanita, the antennae are proportionally shorter than in Cosmotomidius, and reach the elytral apex ( Z. perpulchra) at the basal third of VIII (apparently, it is the same in the holotype male of Z. biocellata (Tippmann, 1960)) . In females of Zikanita, the antennae are considerably variable in length, and may reach the elytral apex from the apex of antennomere VIII to the apex of antennomere X. As for the proportions between the width of the posterior area of the prothorax and the humeral area, we agree with Machado and Monné (2011). The only exception is found in C. egregius, originally described in Zikanita . In this species, the humeral width is about 1.53 times greater than posterior margin of the prothorax, being intermediate between those of the remaining species of Cosmotomidius and those of Zikanita . However, the antennae in males of C. egregius are proportionally much longer than in males of Zikanita . The other feature pointed out by Machado and Monné (2011) total length of the species, is now less reliable, since the new species of Zikanita described here is less than 14 mm long.</p><p>As an additional feature separating the current species placed in Zikanita from those of Cosmotomidius, we report that all species of the former have a sub-reniform dark pubescent macula on each side of the pronotum, which is absent in Cosmotomidius .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EC1961FFF1280EB29EFC7DFBF5FEF0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Nascimento, Francisco E. de L.;Santos-Silva, Antonio;Barclay, Maxwell V. L.	Nascimento, Francisco E. de L., Santos-Silva, Antonio, Barclay, Maxwell V. L. (2019): On the tribal allocation of Cosmotomidius Melzerı 1931 ı descriptions of new taxa of Acanthoderini and notes on some tribes of Lamiinae (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Journal of Natural History 53 (11): 705-723, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2019.1606356
03EC1961FFF5280EB2B1FEA2FE88FC05.text	03EC1961FFF5280EB2B1FEA2FE88FC05.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Zikanita perpulchra , Lane 1943	<div><p>Zikanita perpulchra Lane, 1943</p><p>(Figure 3 (a – g))</p><p>Zikanita perpulchra Lane, 1943: 262; Monné, 2018: 310 (cat.).</p><p>The species was described based on four specimens (holotype female, two female paratypes, one paratype of unknown sex). Machado and Monné (2011) figured a male of the species, but did not provide differences between male and female.</p><p>Males differ from females as follows: body (Figure 3 (d)) slightly narrower (wider in female (Figure 3 (a)); antennae (Figure 3 (d)) slightly longer, 1.74 times elytral length, reaching elytral apex at basal third of antennomere VIII (shorter, 1.56 times elytral length, reaching elytral apex at apex of antennomere VIII in female (Figure 3 (a)); abdominal ventrite V (Figure 3 (e)) shorter, wider, not depressed centrally (longer, narrower, depressed centrally in female (Figure 3 (c)).</p><p>Material examined</p><p>BRAZIL, Rio de Janeiro: Itatiaia (700 m), 1 male, 28 January 1938, coll . J .F . Zikán (MZSP); (1100 m), 1 female, January 1972, no collector indicated (MZSP, former Diringshofen collection) .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EC1961FFF5280EB2B1FEA2FE88FC05	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Nascimento, Francisco E. de L.;Santos-Silva, Antonio;Barclay, Maxwell V. L.	Nascimento, Francisco E. de L., Santos-Silva, Antonio, Barclay, Maxwell V. L. (2019): On the tribal allocation of Cosmotomidius Melzerı 1931 ı descriptions of new taxa of Acanthoderini and notes on some tribes of Lamiinae (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Journal of Natural History 53 (11): 705-723, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2019.1606356
03EC1961FFF52812B2B8FBCDFEEDFA43.text	03EC1961FFF52812B2B8FBCDFEEDFA43.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Zikanita diversicornis Nascimento & Santos-Silva & Barclay 2019	<div><p>Zikanita diversicornis sp. nov.</p><p>(Figure 4 (a – f))</p><p>Description</p><p>Female. Integument mostly dark brown; mouthparts dark reddish brown, with lighter areas, especially on palpi; antennomeres slightly dark reddish brown towards XI; elytra gradually, slightly dark reddish brown towards apex; legs dark reddish brown, except yellowish-brown central area of tibiae.</p><p>Head. Frons minutely, densely punctate throughout; with yellowish-white pubescence partially obscuring integument, gradually yellowish brown towards vertex, with very long, white setae interspersed. Area between antennal tubercles with sculpturing and erect setae as on frons; with yellowish-brown pubescence nearly obscuring integument; area between antennal tubercles and upper eye lobes with slightly elevated, longitudinal carina centrally; remaining surface of vertex densely, finely punctate (finer than on frons); with yellowish-brown pubescence obscuring integument interspersed with very long, erect white setae between upper eye lobes. Area behind eyes minutely, densely punctate (punctures finer than on frons); with dense yellowish-brown pubescent band close to eye, nearly glabrous on remaining surface; with a few long, erect yellowish-brown setae close to upper eye lobe; with very long, erect white setae close to lower eye lobe. Antennal tubercles with sculpturing as on frons; with yellowish-brown pubescence partially obscuring integument on inner surface, yellowishwhite on anterior and posterior surfaces, and close distal margin. Median groove slightly marked close to clypeus and prothoracic margin, well marked on remaining area. Genae with dense yellowish-brown pubescence except glabrous area close to apex. Gulamentum smooth and glabrous except narrow anterior area slightly rugose, with sparse yellowish-brown pubescence. Postclypeus narrow, nearly horizontal close to frons, abruptly inclined towards anteclypeus; with yellowish-brown pubescence partially obscuring integument on wide central area, glabrous laterally; with very long, erect, sparse yellowish-brown setae (more brownish depending on light intensity). Labrum coplanar with anteclypeus at posterior half, inclined at anterior half; with moderately sparse yellowish-brown pubescence on posterior half, interspersed with long, brownish setae laterally, glabrous on anterior half; with short fringe with yellowish pubescence on anterior margin. Distance between upper eye lobes 0.49 times length of scape; in frontal view, distance between lower eye lobes 0.93 times length of scape. Antennae 1.46 times elytral length, reaching elytral apex at apex of antennomere X. Scape with yellowish-brown pubescence partially obscuring integument (lighter depending on light intensity), with central area with yellowish-white pubescence dorsally; with very long, sparse, erect white setae. Antennomeres with yellowish-brown pubescence partially obscuring integument, except basal white pubescent ring; ventral side of antennomeres III – VII with long, erect white and brownish setae (gradually sparser towards VII). Antennal formula (ratio) based on length of antennomere III: scape = 0.85; pedicel = 0.14; IV = 1.00; V = 0.78; VI = 0.68; VII = 0.61; VIII = 0.56; IX = 0.51; X = 0.46; XI = 0.44.</p><p>Thorax. Prothorax 1.73 times wider than long (including lateral tubercles); lateral tubercles large, conical, with apex obliquely truncate. Pronotum with three large tubercles, one conical, moderately elevated, placed on each side of middle, another central, elliptical, less elevated, placed centrally at posterior half; coarsely, deeply, sparsely punctate near anterior and posterior margins (part of punctures aligned), centrally before central tubercle (punctures near each other), and laterally (punctures distinctly sparser); with yellowish-brown pubescence centrally, obscuring integument, dense yellowish pubescence laterally, and black pubescence on sub-reniform areas; with a few long, erect white setae. Sides of prothorax coarsely, deeply punctate near anterior and posterior margins (punctures coarser than on pronotum); with yellowish-brown pubescence obscuring integument. Ventral side of thorax with yellowish-white pubescence partially obscuring integument (more whitish depending on light intensity); with sparse, moderately long, erect white setae on metathorax. Mesoventral process with central tubercle moderately elevated close to anterior margin, inclined, disappearing towards posterior area. Scutellum with dense yellowish-brown pubescence except yellowishwhite pubescence laterally.</p><p>Elytra. Carina of basal fifth elevated, not flattened at top, posterior area not abruptly inclined and not with superior area projected backwards, with long, erect, dark setae on top. Surface coarsely, sparsely punctate (punctures sparser towards apex); apex slightly oblique truncate, with outer spine long, and sutural angle slightly projected. Pubescence as follows: with yellowish-brown pubescence on wide V-shaped anterior quarter, obscuring integument (including top of carina); white on wide, transverse band slightly surpassing middle, not reaching inclined sides; transverse V-shaped area (narrow area close to suture, widened towards inclined area), placed on before posterior quarter, with light yellowish-brown pubescence interspersed with areas with dark-brown and darker yellowish-brown pubescence; dense white pubescence on posterior quarter, interspersed with small, circular areas with brownish pubescence; with very long, erect white setae, especially laterally, and long, erect dark setae centrally.</p><p>Legs. Femora with yellowish-white pubescence not obscuring integument, except large macula with yellowish-brown pubescence on about middle of club; with very long, erect, sparse white setae. Tibiae with yellowish-white pubescence nearly obscuring integument (more whitish depending on light intensity), except one ring with sparse yellowish-brown pubescence on basal and distal half; with very long, erect, sparse white setae. Tarsi with sparse yellowish-white pubescence, denser on basal half of tarsomere I.</p><p>Abdomen. Ventrites I – IV with yellowish-white pubescence partially obscuring integument laterally, sparser centrally, longer, more yellowish on posterior area (except centrally on II – IV); ventrite V longitudinally depressed centrally, with sparse yellowish-brown pubescence on basal 3/4, slightly denser, longer on distal quarter, with long, erect setae of same colour interspersed on posterior quarter.</p><p>Dimensions (holotype female)</p><p>Total length, 12.80; prothoracic length, 2.50; posterior prothoracic width, 3.20; anterior prothoracic width, 3.20; maximum prothoracic width (between apices of lateral tubercles), 4.40; humeral width, 5.15; elytral length, 9.05.</p><p>Type material</p><p>Holotype female (paratype of Z. perpulchra) from BRAZIL, São Paulo: São Paulo (Santo Amaro), 1 November 1940, no collector indicated (MZSP).</p><p>Etymology</p><p>Latin: ‘diversis’ (different), and ‘cornis’ (horn), referring to the difference in antenna length from its congeners.</p><p>Remarks</p><p>As discussed above, Lane (1943) considered the paratype of Z. perpulchra (now the holotype of Z. diversicornis) from Santo Amaro as being a specimen of atypical development. Actually, Z. diversicornis differs considerably from females of Z. perpulchra, not only in the features pointed out by Lane (1943) but also in other characters, making it evident that it is a different species: antennomeres III and IV (Figure 4 (a)) of the same length; lateral tubercles of the pronotum (Figure 4 (c – e)) considerable smaller and less elevated; anterior carina of the elytra (Figure 4 (a – d)) is uniformly inclined towards its posterior area, not flattened dorsally, not projected backwards posteriorly, pubescent and with long, erect, dark setae dorsally; mesoventral process (Figure 4 (f)) distinctly less elevated and gradually inclined towards its apex. In the female of Z. perpulchra, antennomere III is longer than IV (Figure 3 (a)) the lateral tubercles of the pronotum (Figure 3 (f,g)) are distinctly larger and more elevated, the anterior carina of the elytra (Figure 3 (a,g)) is abruptly inclined posteriorly, flattened dorsally, projected backwards posteriorly, glabrous and without erect setae dorsally, and the mesoventral process (Figure 3 (b)) is notably elevated and abruptly inclined posteriorly.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EC1961FFF52812B2B8FBCDFEEDFA43	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Nascimento, Francisco E. de L.;Santos-Silva, Antonio;Barclay, Maxwell V. L.	Nascimento, Francisco E. de L., Santos-Silva, Antonio, Barclay, Maxwell V. L. (2019): On the tribal allocation of Cosmotomidius Melzerı 1931 ı descriptions of new taxa of Acanthoderini and notes on some tribes of Lamiinae (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Journal of Natural History 53 (11): 705-723, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2019.1606356
