identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03EF8798FFA9FF8666E8FCDCF5DBFD6B.text	03EF8798FFA9FF8666E8FCDCF5DBFD6B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Coelidiana aroeira Gonçalves & Silva & Domahovski & Alasmar & Paladini 2024	<div><p>Coelidiana aroeira sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs 1–5)</p><p>Diagnosis. Crown (Fig. 3A, C) with four orange stripes, three longitudinal and one transverse forming E-shaped macula. Forewing (Fig. 3A–D) yellow with a brown stripe along the entire anal margin and appendix. Male pygofer (Fig. 1F) dorsal margin with an elongated, narrow and acute process, contiguous to the margin, slightly surpassing pygofer apex; ventral margin with a small dentiform apical process. Subgenital plates, in lateral view (Fig. 1E, H) surpassing the pygofer apex, narrow at base and widened on apical half; in ventral view (Fig. 1G) plates fused together along their entire length, except apically. Connective (Fig. 1I) Y-shaped.Aedeagus (Fig. 1K) in lateral view with atrium broad bearing an acute, slightly recurved ventral process nearly same size and shape as shaft, fused basally to shaft, expanded subapically in posterior view (Fig. 1L); shaft tubular, elongated and narrow, with apex subacute. Female sternite VII (Fig. 2A, C) wider than long; posterior margin with median third deeply and roundly excavated.</p><p>Measurements. Holotype male: total length 5.7. Paratypes: males (n = 13), 5.5–5.9 mm; females (n = 34), 6.0– 6.5 mm.</p><p>Coloration. Green, in life (Fig. 3E), pale yellow, preserved (Fig 3A–D). Crown (Fig. 3A) with four orange stripes, three longitudinal and one transverse forming E-shaped macula, longitudinal strips extending to mesonotum. Forewing (Fig. 3A–D) yellow with a brown stripe along the entire anal margin and appendix.</p><p>Description. Head, in dorsal view (Fig. 1A), moderately produced anteriorly, median length of crown approximately equal to or slightly less than interocular width; transocular width about six-sevenths of humeral width of pronotum; crown subpentagonal, anterior margin bluntly angled, surface flat and smooth; ocellus on anterior margin of head, distant from eye margin, not visible in dorsal view; coronal suture indistinct. Head, in frontal view (Fig. 1B), with face approximately as high as wide; frontogenal suture reaching to ocelli; antennal ledge oblique and carinate; frons approximately 1.5 times longer than wide; muscle impressions indistinct; epistomal suture distinct, complete and slightly arched; clypeus approximately 1.6 times longer than maximum width, lateral margins parallel, apex straight; maxillary plate produced ventrally, slightly surpassing the clypeus apex; lorum ellipse-shaped, apical margin not reaching apex of clypeus; gena incompletely covering episternum. Head, in lateral view (Fig. 1C), with crown-face transition subacute, with marginal carina; lateral margins of crown, adjacent to eyes, raised and not carinated; antenna with long flagellum, exceeding half-length of forewing; frons convex. Pronotum (Fig. 1A) with slightly transverse superficial striae on disc; lateral margins rounded, convergent anterad, as long as eye; posterior margin acutely excavated; in lateral view (Fig. 1C), slightly declivous; dorsopleural carina present and slightly arched. Mesonotum (Fig. 1A) as long as wide. Forewing (Fig. 1D) semi-hyaline, approximately 3.3 times longer than maximum width; venation distinct apically; three anteapical and four apical cells, bases of second and fourth apical cells approximately equidistant, base of third apical cell more distal than basis of second and fourth apical cells; alar appendix narrow; apex rounded. Hind wing with vein R 4+5 and M 1+2 preapically convergent, fused at apex, forming single vein. Profemur with AD, AM, and PD rows reduced and poorly defined, with exception of apical setae AD1, AM1, and PD1, respectively; AV and PV rows absent; IC row formed by slightly arched comb of fine setae, beginning at basal third and extending to apex. Protibia, in cross-section, semi-circular; AV row formed by approximately 15–16 setae, the 5–6 at basal third nearly half the length of the 10 distal ones, which are slightly longer and thicker towards apex; AD formed by a single apical seta; PD formed by 2 setae, one at beginning of apical third and another at apex; PV row with 2–3 widely spaced setae. Metafemur with setal formula 2:2:1, with inner seta of second pair reduced in size. Metatibial AD row with 2– 5 intercalary setae between macrosetae; PD, AD, and PV rows with 15–16, 9–11, and 38–42 macrosetae, respectively; AV row with approximately 6–7 macrosetae distributed only in the middle third of tibia. Metatarsomere I longer than combined length of two distal tarsomeres; plantar surface with two rows of setae, external row with longer and robust setae than inner row; pecten with 4–5 platellae. Metatarsomere II pecten with 3 platellae.</p><p>Male terminalia. Pygofer, in lateral view (Fig. 1E, F), subtriangular, wide at the base and progressively narrowing towards the apex; dorsal and ventral margins strongly sclerotized; dorsal margin with an elongated, narrow and acute process, contiguous to the margin, slightly surpassing pygofer apex; ventral margin broadly rounded on basal half, apical portion with a small dentiform process; apex subtruncate. Anal tube (Fig. 1E) cylindrical; tergite X four times longer than wide; without processes. Subgenital plates, in lateral view (Fig. 1E, H) surpassing the pygofer apex, approximately 2.3 times longer than maximum height; narrow at base and widened on apical half; dorsal margin excavated on basal half and rounded on apical half, with a tuft of small setae; apex rounded; in ventral view (Fig. 1G) oval, plates fused together along their entire length, except apically; anterior margin deeply excavated; lateral margins rounded and convergent anteriorly and posteriorly; apex of each plate rounded. Connective (Fig. 1I) Y-shaped, arms slightly longer than stem; approximately two-thirds length of style; slender dorsal keel present and projected anteriorly between arms. Style (Fig. 1E, I, J) with apophysis moderately stout, slightly expanded apically; preapical lobe reduced and rounded, with some elongated setae; apex curved ventrally, hook-shaped. Aedeagus, in lateral view (Fig. 1E, K), with dorsal apodeme membranous and narrow; preatrium well developed; atrium broad bearing a ventral process fused basally to shaft, elongated, about half length of shaft; shaft tubular, elongated and narrow, apex subacute; gonopore subapical ventral; in posterior view (Fig. 1L), ventral process expanded subapically in posterior view.</p><p>Female terminalia. Sternite VII (Fig. 2A, C) U-shaped, 1.4 times wider than long; lateral margins slightly rounded; posterior margin with median third deeply and roundly excavated. ʻInternalʼ sternite VIII (Fig. 2C) sclerotized, medially narrow and lateral region expanded in a semicircular shape. Pygofer (Fig. 2B, D) elongate, 1.6 times as long as maximum height; dorsal margin straight; ventral margin broadly rounded; macrosetae distributed near apex and ventral margin; apex truncated. Ovipositor (Fig. 2B) slightly exceeding apex of pygofer, slightly curved dorsally. First valvifer (Fig. 2E) subrectangular oblique, higher than long; margins straight, angles rounded. First valvula of ovipositor (Fig. 2E, F) elongated, height approximately constant throughout the length; dorsal sculptured area submarginal, present throughout apical half, expanded to the ventral region only in the apical portion, sculptured area approximately bacilliform near dorsal margin and strigate near median region; apex subacute. Second valvifer (Fig. 2G) higher than long. Second valvula of ovipositor (Fig. 2G, H) elongated, fused to each on median portion; apical portion slightly expanded, dorsal margin with several irregular small teeth and with two larger teeth, one basal and one median. Gonoplac (Fig. 2I, J) gradually expanded over most of length, evenly tapered in apical third; external surface along ventral margin and apex with dentiform cuticular projections and few short and robust setae; apex rounded or acutely rounded.</p><p>Etymology. The species epithet is a noun in apposition based on the Portuguese common name of the tree on which the new species was collected, “Aroeira-Pimenteira.”</p><p>Material examined. Holotype male, “ Brasil, PR, S. J. dos Pinhais, \ <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-49.193333&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-25.60389" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -49.193333/lat -25.60389)">Campina do Taquaral</a>, 878m \ a.s.l., 25º36'14"S, 49º11'36"W, \ 23.III.2024, A.C. Domahovski \ leg., Aroeira SJP-001”, (DZUP) . Paratypes: 7♀, same data of holotype, (DZUP); 3 ♂, 15♀, same data of holotype, except 30.III.2014, SJP-002, (DZRJ); 2♂, same data of holotype, except 13.IV.2024, SJP-004, (DZUP); 2♂, same data of holotype, except 27.IV.2024, SJP-006, (DZUP); 1♂, 8♀, “ Brasil, PR, Curitiba, Centro \ <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-49.231667&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-25.447498" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -49.231667/lat -25.447498)">Politécnico</a>, fundos do Bioló- \ gicas, 918m a.s.l., 25º26'51"S, \ 49º13'54"W, 26.III.2024, J.F.S. \ da Silva leg., Aroeira CP-001” (DZUP) ; 4♀, same data of preceding, except 02.IV.2024, CP-002, (DZUP); 4♂, same data of preceding, except 16.IV.2024, CP-004, (DZUP); 1♂ same data of preceding, except 23.IV.2024, CP-005 (DZUP); 1♂ same data of preceding, except 30.IV.2024, CP-006 (DZUP) .</p><p>Additional specimens examined. (Stored in ethanol, DZUP); 2 ♀, SJP-001; 9 ♀, SJP-003; 11 ♀, SJP-004; 10 ♀, SJP-005; 10 ♀, SJP-006; 3♀, CP-003; 7♀, CP-004; 8♀, CP-005; 5♀, CP-006. Immatutes. 5 nymphs, SJP-003; 1 nymph, SJP-004; 5 nymphs, SJP-005; 16 nymphs, SJP-006; 6 nymphs CP-005; 9 nymphs CP-006.</p><p>Remarks. Coelidiana aroeira sp. nov. resembles Coelidiana brasiliensis and Coelidiana diminuta due to the presence of a single ventral process on the aedeagus but the former differs in having the ventral process of the aedeagus basally fused to the shaft (Fig. 1K).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF8798FFA9FF8666E8FCDCF5DBFD6B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Gonçalves, Clayton Corrêa;Silva, Jean Francisco Souza Da;Domahovski, Alexandre Cruz;Alasmar, Luísa;Paladini, Andressa	Gonçalves, Clayton Corrêa, Silva, Jean Francisco Souza Da, Domahovski, Alexandre Cruz, Alasmar, Luísa, Paladini, Andressa (2024): A new species of Coelidiana Oman (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Neocoelidiinae) from Brazil with key to Brazilian species, description of immature stages, and notes about parasitoids and host plant. Zootaxa 5529 (2): 359-372, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5529.2.7, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5529.2.7
03EF8798FFADFF8866E8FF79F467F869.text	03EF8798FFADFF8866E8FF79F467F869.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Coelidiana Oman 1938	<div><p>Key to Coelidiana species recorded for Brazil</p><p>1 Forewings each with a dark stripe along the base and anal margin, forming a large X when at rest...................... 2</p><p>1’ Forewings without dark stripes, or if present, narrow and longitudinal, not forming X when at rest..................... 3</p><p>2 Crow with a large orange macula on apex; pronotum with two broad red longitudinal bands behind each eye extended from anterior to posterior margin of pronotum....................................................... C. distinctissima</p><p>2’ Crow and pronotum without maculae.............................................................. C. undata</p><p>3 Aedeagus with one or more processes (Fig. 1K)............................................................. 4</p><p>3’ Aedeagus without processes............................................................................. 7</p><p>4 Aedeagus with paired lateroventral processes (Chiamolera &amp; Cavichioli, 2000 b; Figs 7, 8)................. C. sinopensis</p><p>4’ Aedeagus with a single ventral process (Fig. 1K)............................................................ 5</p><p>5 Aedeagus with ventral process short, basally fused to shaft (Fig. 1K).............................. C. aroeira sp. nov.</p><p>5’ Aedeagus with ventral process long, arising from preatrium, not fused to shaft (Chiamolera &amp; Cavichioli, 2005; Fig. 18)....6</p><p>6 Male pygofer with dorsoapical portion strongly projected, with a small ventral spine at base (Chiamolera &amp; Cavichioli, 2005; Fig. 16); aedeagus with shaft narrow along its entire length (Chiamolera &amp; Cavichioli, 2005; Fig. 18).......... C. diminuta</p><p>6’ Male pygofer with the dorsoapical portion slightly projected, without spine at base (Linnavuori, 1965; Fig. 4a); aedeagus with shaft broad at base and narrowing towards apex (Linnavuori, 1965; Fig. 3i)............................. C. brasiliensis</p><p>7 Male pygofer without tooth or process on ventral margin (DeLong, 1953; Plate 8, Fig. 8)...................... C. spina</p><p>7’ Male pygofer with tooth or process on ventral margin.........................................................8</p><p>8 Forewing with a dark brown oblique stripe on apical third (Chiamolera &amp; Cavichioli, 2005; Fig. 7); anal tube with paired ventral processes (Chiamolera &amp; Cavichioli, 2005; Fig. 2)................................................ C. bella</p><p>8’ Forewing without an oblique stripe on apical third; anal tube without processes.................................... 9</p><p>9 Forewing with a pair of dark maculae adjacent to anal margin, a larger one on apical parts of anal veins and a smaller one at base of first apical cell; male pygofer with dorsapical portion projected and strongly curved ventrally, ventral margin with a long and slender subapical process directed ventrally (DeLong, 1953; Plate 8, Fig. 7)............................. C. bimaculata</p><p>9’ Forewing without maculae; male pygofer with dorsoapical portion, if projected, directed caudally, not strongly curved ventrally, ventral margin with small tooth......................................................................... 10</p><p>10 Crown flat; male pygofer with dorsoapical margin abruptly narrow and projected, forming an apical spiniform process; aedeagus with shaft curved anteriorly.............................................................................11</p><p>10’ Crown concave or with a median elevation; male pygofer with apical third progressively narrowed, not forming a process; aedeagus with shaft not curved anteriorly..................................................................12</p><p>11 Aedeagus with ventral margin smooth, apex, in lateral view, rounded (Kramer, 1964; Fig. 99).............. C. rubrolineata</p><p>11’ Aedeagus with ventral margin crenulated, apex, in lateral view, acute (Kramer, 1964; Fig. 95)................ C. roceata</p><p>12 Mesonotum with brown maculae; male pygofer with dorsal margin of apical half smooth, apex acutely rounded and directed caudally (Chiamolera &amp; Cavichioli, 2000 a; Fig. 2); aedeagus with apical portion curved caudally (Chiamolera &amp; Cavichioli, 2000 a; Fig. 4).............................................................................. C. ferruginea</p><p>12’ Mesonotum pale yellow, without maculae (Chiamolera &amp; Cavichioli, 2005; Fig. 14); male pygofer with dorsal margin of apical half crenulated, apex acute and directed ventrally (Chiamolera &amp; Cavichioli, 2005; Fig. 9); aedeagus with apical portion directed dorsally (Chiamolera &amp; Cavichioli, 2005; Fig. 11).............................................. C. stricta</p><p>Descriptions of Nymphs</p><p>(Fig. 4)</p><p>General description. Resembling the adult in general form. Coloration yellow (yellowish-green in life), with faint orangish markings; dorsum slightly more orangish than the venter, light yellow. Head triangular, with width equal to that of pronotum; marginal carina at crown-face transition well developed. Eyes slightly darkened. Antenne slightly longer than the body length. Hind wing pad with a pair of apical setae. Terga IV-VII with a pair of lateral setae, tergum VIII with two pairs of lateral setae, tergum IX with several elongate setae and triangular/acute distal lobes.</p><p>First instar. Length 1.40–2.14mm (See Table 1 for other measurements).Abdominal tergum IX not differentiated in distal lobes (Fig. 4A).</p><p>Second instar. Length 2.20–3.15 mm. Wing pads development started, with fore wingpads not reaching half of metanotum, tergum IX of abdomen with formed distal lobes, with apex acute (Fig. 4B).</p><p>Third instar. Length 3.35–3.96 mm. Wing pads well differentiated in fore and hind pads, with forewing pads much more developed than hind and reaching or trespassing half of metanotum (Fig. 4C).</p><p>Fourth instar. Length 3.65–4.0 mm. Wing pads both developed but strongly flattened, broadened, fore wing pad with apex reaching the apex of the hing wing pad, both with rounded apices (Fig. 4D).</p><p>Fifth instar. Length 4.35–5.60 mm. Wing pads well developed, tumid, with apices overlapped, distal portion of abdomen differentiated in male and female plates (Fig 4E). Male plates (Fig. 5A) are a single, short and broad structure, only apically divided. Female plates (Fig. 5B) are two elongate structures, narrowing gradually towards apex.</p><p>Remarks. All stages are very similar to each other in morphology and coloration, differing mainly in wing pad development and body size. The nymphs exhibit a noticeable developmental leap from the second to third instars, as evidenced in a strong increase in body size. However, the size difference is more subtle between other instars, making them different to distinguish based on size alone. The relative wing pad size is approximately constant between all observed specimens of each instar and is, therefore, more reliable characteristic for distinguishing instars. Nevertheless, the fourth and the fifth instars have nearly the same wing pad length but the wing pads differ in form: flattened in the fourth and tumid in the fifth instar.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF8798FFADFF8866E8FF79F467F869	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Gonçalves, Clayton Corrêa;Silva, Jean Francisco Souza Da;Domahovski, Alexandre Cruz;Alasmar, Luísa;Paladini, Andressa	Gonçalves, Clayton Corrêa, Silva, Jean Francisco Souza Da, Domahovski, Alexandre Cruz, Alasmar, Luísa, Paladini, Andressa (2024): A new species of Coelidiana Oman (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Neocoelidiinae) from Brazil with key to Brazilian species, description of immature stages, and notes about parasitoids and host plant. Zootaxa 5529 (2): 359-372, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5529.2.7, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5529.2.7
