identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03E787BDFF89E53CA6CDFCDBFAB21FD6.text	03E787BDFF89E53CA6CDFCDBFAB21FD6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hypoaspis (Hypoaspis) surii	<div><p>Hypoaspis (Hypoaspis) surii n. sp.</p> <p>(Figs 1–10)</p> <p>Diagnosis. Posterior opisthosomal setae (Z4, S5, R6, and podonotal setae j3, z4, s5 which are longest), undulate; anogenital setae JV5 and ZV5 long and undulate; epistome pointed anteriorly; tarsus IV with four macrosetae, genua III and IV with two macrosetae, femora II, III and IV also with macrosetae.</p> <p>FEMALE (n = 15). Length of dorsal shield 898 (809–903), width at level of setae r5 493 (450–493).</p> <p>Dorsum (Fig. 1). Dorsal shield with 43 pairs of setae, lateral setae distinctly longer than dorso-central setae. All dorsal setae smooth except some posterior setae (S5, Z4, Z5 and J5) which are slightly pilose. Shield anterolaterally almost smooth, opisthonotum reticulated marginally. Some lateral setae, especially posterior opisthosomal setae, undulate; setae j3 238 (227), z4 218 (163), Z4 325 (325), R6 200 (210), s5 235 (245) longest. Opisthonotum with supernumerary setae ZX1 and ZX2. Integument surrounding shield with six pairs of setae (R1 – 6) (Fig. 1). Peritremal shield not fused with dorsal shield anteriorly. Peritremes reach base of setae s2 (Fig. 1). Setae j1 83 (87–85), s1 83 (84–88), z1 43 (43–47) and J5 88 (85–88) are shortest.</p> <p>Gnathosoma (Figs 2–5). Hypostomal groove with six rows of denticles, each row with 9–13 denticles. Hypostome with four pairs of setae, internal posterior hypostomatic setae (h3) the longest, h1 43 (43–45), h2 43 (43–50), h3 113 (110–115), pc 52 (48–53). Anterior margin of epistome pointed, triangular, with 10 or more denticles (Fig. 5). Fixed cheliceral digit with nine small and two large teeth (distal to pilus dentilis), pilus dentilis 10 (9–12) well developed, associated with a large posterior tooth (Fig. 2). Palp: 238 (237–2341) long; femur 1–1/ 0–0/0–0; genu 1–0/1–2/1–0; tibia 2–0/0–1/1–1, tarsus 1–0/0–2/1–1; palp apotele two–tined (Fig. 4).</p> <p>Venter (Fig. 6). Tritosternum biramous, laciniae pilose, length of tritosternum 245 (208–257) (Fig. 6). Presternal plates weakly lineate and lightly sclerotised. Length of sternal shield 148 (148–170), width 168 (158– 178), reticulate, with three pairs of sternal setae, a pair of slit-like pores posterior to st1 and a pair of large round or oval pores between setae st2 to st3. Setae st4 on soft integument. Length of sternal setae st1 53 (50–65), st2 63 (62– 73), st3 60 (58–63), st4 55 (55–70), st5 55 (50–59). Distances between sternal setae: st1 – st1 103 (93–103), st2 – st2 133 (125–133), st3 – st3 168 (158–178), st4 – st4 155 (150–165), st5 – st5 130 (125–153) and st1 – st3 143 (140–153). Genital shield tongue-shaped and reticulate, width 133 (128–139) at level of st5. Anal shield pear shaped, length 135 (110–135), width 100 (100–125), punctate posteriorly and smooth anteriorly, with three circumanal setae. Para-anal setae longer than post-anal seta, almost in line with posterior margin of anal opening (Fig. 6). Peritremal shields free, with posterior incision (Fig. 6). Opisthogaster with 11 pairs of smooth setae, setae ZV5 and JV5 the longest, length of opisthogastric setae JV1 68 (58–82), JV2 88(82–107), JV3 80 (74–82), JV4 193 (188–195), JV5 251 (249–253), ZV1 81 (75–81), ZV2 120 (108–130), ZV3 90 (83–108), ZV4 193 (188–195), ZV5 220 (193–245) and JV5 and ZV5 the longest; setae JV4 – 5 and ZV4 – 5 undulate; three pairs of metapodal shields, two elongate and one small and rounded, all posterior to coxae IV.</p> <p>Spermatheca (Fig. 7). Sacculus squarish, ramus very short and tube-like, with tubulus very slender and long, with conspicuous opening on coxae III.</p> <p>Legs (Figs 8–10). Leg IV longest, longer than dorsal shield. Leg I slender, with ambulacral claws smaller than those of other legs. Leg II stouter than other legs, with spine-like setae on tarsus and tibia, leg III with spine-like setae on genu. Chaetotaxy as recorded for free-living laelapids (Evans, 1963); femora (II) 2, 2/1, 2/1, 1, (III) 1, 2/1, 1/0, 1, (IV) 1, 2/1, 1/0, 1; genua (II) 2, 3/1, 3/1, 1, (III) 2, 2/1, 2/1, 1, (IV) 2, 2/1, 3/0, 1; tibiae (II) 2, 2/0, 2/2, 2, (III) 2, 1/1, 2/1, 1, (IV) 2, 1/1, 3/1, 2; tarsi (II) 3, 3/2, 3/2, 3 + md + mv, (III) 3, 3/2, 3/2, 3 + md + mv, (IV) 3, 3/2, 3/2, 3 + md + mv. Femur II, III and IV each with one macroseta, genu III and IV each with two macrosetae; tarsus IV with four macrosetae (Figs 8–10). Length of leg I (coxae to tip of ambulacrum) 943 (805–968), leg II 712 (648– 813), leg III 763 (743–838) and leg IV 1075 (1000–1163). Length of macrosetae: femur II setae pd1 260 (240– 260), femur III ad1 255 (228–260), femur IV ad1 388 (375–403), genu III [ad1 125 (113–112), pd1 114 (110– 120)], genu IV [ad1 240 (225–243), pd1 198 (160–198)]; tarsus IV with four macrosetae [ad2 setae 215 (213–218), ad3 setae 208 (210–218), pd2 setae 235 (230–247), pd3 setae 220 (220–223)] (Fig. 10) and tarsi I–II and III without macrosetae.</p> <p>Remarks. The new species is similar to H. polyphyllae in general appearance but differs from the latter as follows: dorsum with 43 pairs of setae in H. surii n. sp. compared with 35 pairs in H. polyphyllae; setae Z4 325 (325), j3 238 (227), s5 235 (245), z4 218 (163), R6 200 (210) longest in the new species but only Z4 331(277–370) longest in H. polyphyllae; setae r2 – 3, UR absent in the new species but present in H. polyphyllae; opisthogaster with 11 pairs of setae in the former while nine pairs in the latter; opisthogastric setae JV5 251 (249–253) and ZV5 220 (193–245) much longer and more undulate than those of H. polyphyllae; epistome pointed and with 10 denticles in the new species versus subtriangular and with six denticles in H. polyphyllae; fixed cheliceral digit with nine small denticles in the former but seven in the latter; genu III and IV each with two macrosetae in H. surii versus no macrosetae on genu III and one on IV in H. polyphyllae; tarsus IV with four macrosetae in H. surii opposed to three macrosetae in H. polyphyllae.</p> <p>According to Karg (1979, 1993) and Costa (1971), H. surii n. sp. resembles H. integer in the number of opisthogastric setae and subcapitular setae, and three long opisthocaudal setae. However it differs from H. integer in that the dorsum has 43 pairs of setae in surii and 36–37 in H. integer; setae Z4 325 (325), j3 238 (227), s5 235 (245), z4 218 (163), R6 200 (210) longest in the new species whereas only Z4 (280) in H. integer and with Z3 absent; opisthogastric setae JV5 251 (249–253) and ZV5 220 (193–245) long and undulate in H. surii vs. only ZV5 long and undulate in H. integer; epistome pointed and with ten denticles on margin in new species versus triangular and with 24 denticles in H. integer; fixed digit with nine small denticles in new species but ten in H. integer; tarsus IV with four macrosetae in H. surii but two in H. integer; femur and genu III and IV with spine–like setae in new species versus none in H. integer.</p> <p>Etymology. This species is named in honour of Mr. Ghobad Surii, Department of Agriculture of Hamedan, Iran, who kindly helped senior author in collecting the mites.</p> <p>Type material. Holotype female and 14 paratype females from Polyphylla olivieri Castelnau (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) from potato farms at Bahar, Hamedan Province, Iran, 26 July 2007, coll. Ghobad Surii.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E787BDFF89E53CA6CDFCDBFAB21FD6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Khanjani, Mohammad;Ghaedi, Behnaz;Ueckermann, Rd. A.	Khanjani, Mohammad, Ghaedi, Behnaz, Ueckermann, Rd. A. (2013): New species of Hypoaspis Canestrini and Coleolaelaps Berlese (Mesostigmata: Laelapidae) associated with Polyphylla olivieri Castelnau (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Iran. Zootaxa 3745 (4): 469-478, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3745.4.4
03E787BDFF8CE53FA6CDF9D6FB2E1D27.text	03E787BDFF8CE53FA6CDF9D6FB2E1D27.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Coleolaelaps massoumii	<div><p>Coleolaelaps massoumii n. sp.</p> <p>(Figs 11–20)</p> <p>Diagnosis. This species can be recognised by the following combinations of characters: (1) Setae r1 absent; (2) dorsal shield with deep lateral incisions; (3) Leg IV longer than 1850 Μm; (4) setae z3 present; (5) Genu IV with one pl seta.</p> <p>Female (n = 7). Length of dorsal shield 1425 (1300–1475), width (at level of r3) 815 (718–850).</p> <p>Dorsum (Fig. 11). Dorsal shield with 46 pairs of setae, dorso-central setae rather shorter than lateral setae. All dorsal setae smooth. Dorsal shield coarsely reticulate marginally, with medio-lateral incisions. Some lateral setae undulate, particularly posterior opisthosomal setae, setae s4, z4, S1, S4, S5, Z2 and Z4 longest. Peritremal shield not fused with dorsal shield anteriorly. Peritreme reaching base of setae z3. Length of dorsal setae j1 90 (88–93), j2 189 (188–218), r5 125 (110–180), r6 113 (110–138), R1 112 (110–132), R2 130 (130), R3 153 (138–170), R4 142 (130– 155), Z5 125 (230–245).</p> <p>Gnathosoma (Figs 12–15). Hypostomal groove with seven rows of denticles, each row with 2–12 denticles. Hypostomal setae (h1 – 3 and pc) almost equal in length 75–80 (Fig. 13). Anterior margin of epistome truncate distally with two pointed processes, with 18 or more denticles along margins (Fig. 15). Fixed cheliceral digit with seven small, two large teeth and a small pilus dentilis, associated with posterior large tooth (Fig. 12), length of fixed digit 118 (113–125) and length of movable digit 110 (110–118). Palp apotele two-tined (Fig. 14).</p> <p>Venter (Fig. 16). Tritosternum biramous, laciniae pilose, length of tritosternum 299 (295–303) (Fig. 16). Length of sternal shield 235 (231–245), width (anterior to st3) 185 (173–192); reticulate, with three pairs of sternal setae, a pair of round pores on anterior margin of sternal shield and a pair of round or oval pores posterior to st2. Setae st4 on soft integument. Metasternal shields with a pore (Fig. 16). Length of sternal setae st1 135 (113–155), st2 137 (127–150), st3 141 (138–160), st4 137 (135–171), st5 133 (125–150). Width of genital shield (st5 – st5) 138 (130–138), genital shield long, tongue-shaped and reticulate, setae st5 not on genital shield, setae st 1–5 in longitudinal line; distances between sternal setae: st1 – st1 103 (93–103), st2 – st2 133 (125–133), st3 – st3 168 (158– 178), st4 – st4 155 (150–165), st5 – st5 138 (130–138) and st1–st3 143 (140–153). Anal shield pear shaped, length 135 (110–135), width 100 (100–125), with three anal setae, post-anal longer than para-anals (Fig. 16). Peritremal shield free, posterior extention with very small incision distally (Fig. 16). Opisthogaster with 15 pairs of smooth setae, length of opisthogastric setae: JV1 113 (110–135), JV2 115 (110–138), JV3 203 (200–245), JV4 345 (280– 370), JV5 255 (250–380), ZV1 130 (126–149), ZV2 148 (135–175), ZV3 150 (143–160), ZV4 245 (245–293), ZV5 310 (270–315) and JV5, JV4, ZV4 and ZV5 longest.</p> <p>Spermatheca (Fig. 17). Sacculus almost quadrate, ramus very short and tube–like, with tubulus slender and long, with large opening on coxae III.</p> <p>Legs (Figs 18–20). Length of leg I (coxae to tip of ambulacrum) 1357 (1113–1450), leg II 1245 (1125–1265), leg III 1503 (1400–1513) and leg IV 1938 (1850–1965). Leg chaetotaxy: Leg II: femur 2, 3/1, 2/2, 1, genu 2, 3/1, 2/ 1, 2, tibia 2, 2/1, 2/1, 2, tarsus 3, 3/2, 3/2, 3 + md + mv. Leg III: femur 1, 2/1, 1/0, 1, genu 1, 2/1, 2/1, 2, tibia 1, 2/1, 1/1, 2, tarsus 3, 3/2, 3/2, 3 + md + mv. Leg IV: femur 1, 2/1, 1/1, 0, genu 2, 2/0, 3/0, 2, tibia 2, 1/1, 3/1, 2, tarsus 3, 3/2, 3/2, 3 + md + mv. Leg IV longest, longer than dorsal shield. Leg I slender, with ambulacral claws smaller than those of other legs. Leg II stouter than other legs. Length of macrosetae: femur II pd1 162 (175–150), femur III ad1 165 (200–241), femur IV ad1 350 (256–410); genua IV with two macrosetae, genu IV [ad1 315 (313–386), ad2 251 (212–260)] and tarsus IV with four macrosetae [mv1a1 setae ad2 (300–305), pd2 setae 300 (325–333), ad3 setae 327 (363–350)] and pd3 setae 356 (378–375), (Fig. 18–20) and tarsi I–III without macrosetae.</p> <p>Remarks. According to Karg (1979, 1999) and Costa &amp; Hunter (1970), this species resembles C. agrestis (Berlese) in having one pl seta on genu IV, the same hypostomal details, shape of sternum, genital shield and metapodal elements and one posterolateral seta on genu IV. However, C. massoumii n. sp. differs from the former by: opisthogastric setae longer than those of the latter; seta j6 reaching pass the base of setae J 1 in the new species but not reaching it in latter; setae J2 and J3 reaching pass the base of setae J3 and J4 respectively in the former opposed to not reaching them in the second species; dorso-central setae extend to base of setae next behind but shorter in C. agrestis; macrosetae on tarsus IV longer than those of former, tarsus IV with four long macrosetae in new species but only one in C. agrestis; genu IV with two macrosetae versus one; femur III with one macrosetae versus no macrosetae in C. agrestis; anterior margin of the epistome with 18 lateral denticles and two larger central ones in new species whereas no lateral denticles in H. agrestis; C. massoumii with J1 but C. agrestis without this seta; fixed digit with two large denticles in C. massoumii with only one in C. agrestis; dorsum with 46 pairs of setae in the new species versus 43 in the C. agrestis; meta–podal elements three in new species whereas two in C. agrestis; deutosternal groove with seven rows of denticles in the C. massoumii while six in C. agrestis.</p> <p>Etymology. This species is named in honour of Prof. Lotfali Massoumi, Department of Biology of Mohaghegh Ardebili University, Ardebil, Iran, who kindly helped Ms. Behnaz Ghaedi during her MSc degree at Ardebil University, Ardebil Province.</p> <p>Type material. Holotype female and six paratype females from Polyphylla olivieri Castelnau (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) collected from cherry trees, Hamadan, Iran, 31 July 2007, coll. M. Khanjani.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E787BDFF8CE53FA6CDF9D6FB2E1D27	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Khanjani, Mohammad;Ghaedi, Behnaz;Ueckermann, Rd. A.	Khanjani, Mohammad, Ghaedi, Behnaz, Ueckermann, Rd. A. (2013): New species of Hypoaspis Canestrini and Coleolaelaps Berlese (Mesostigmata: Laelapidae) associated with Polyphylla olivieri Castelnau (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Iran. Zootaxa 3745 (4): 469-478, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3745.4.4
