identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03D4A37D83768E4BFEDFFAE2C37EFAD8.text	03D4A37D83768E4BFEDFFAE2C37EFAD8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Andinopanurgus chirosimpson Packer 2021	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Andinopanurgus chirosimpson Packer ,  new species</p>
            <p>ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 602929D3-03C0-459E-9641-5350C04C653C</p>
            <p>(Figs. 1–8, 24)</p>
            <p> DIAGNOSIS: The new species, known only from the male, can be differentiated from all other bees except the second new species described below by the very unusual setal patern on S4 (Figs. 4–5), which involves setae that are branched into two unequal halves or three or four more equal thirds or quarters respectively. Each branch is somewhat digitiform and the whole structure can look like a human hand (minus the thumb) or rake while the three-branched hairs look somewhat like tridents. There are weak longitudinal raised lines on these branches (Fig. 5). While some related species,  A. bachue (Gonzalez &amp; Ruz) ,  A. rangeli (Gonzalez &amp; Ruz) , and  A. wayruronga (Gonzalez &amp; Ruz) , have short, broad setae apicomedially on S5, these species do not have unusual setae on S4 (they also differ in numerous other ways, but the details of the setation of S4 of the new species alone is sufficient to diagnose it). It can be differentiated from  A. lynnae , described below, by the absence of the pale transverse clypeal marking that is present in  A. lynnae and in details of the setation on S4 (compare Figs. 4–5 with Figs. 11–12). </p>
            <p>DESCRIPTION: ♂: Body length 6.05 mm, forewing length 4.3 mm, head width 1.55 mm, intertegular distance ≈ 0.9mm [thorax somewhat distorted by pin].</p>
            <p>Coloration. Black, following parts dark red-brown: apex of mandible, base of labrum, legs, tegula, vein R and prestigma; apex of apical impressed areas of T 4– T 6, all of T 7, apical impressed areas of S1–S5; all of S6; following parts dark yellow brown: reflexed sides of terga and most remaining wing veins and stigma; F2–F11 dark brown ventrally, black-brown dorsally; wing membranes pale yellow-brown.</p>
            <p>Pubescence. Whitish with numerous short branches, sparse unless stated otherwise; longest less than 2.5 MOD on face, mesoscutum and scutellum and relatively dense on sides and ventral surface of mesosoma including procoxa, protrochanter, and metacoxa; shorter ≈1.5 MOD on genal area below, lateral surface of propodeum above; dense, somewhat anteriorly oriented and short ≈1 MOD on metanotum; metasomal terga with obscure hairs except T 6– T 7 with pale orange hairs ≈1.5 MOD; apex of T 7 with dense cream-colored plumose short ≈0.5 MOD hairs obscuring underlying integument; S1 and apicolateral portions of S2–S6 with branched hairs ≈1.5 MOD; S4 apicomedially with setae that are divided from near the base into two to four parallel, digitiform branches, setae up to ≈0.3 MOD wide, the four-branched ones are less than twice as long as the width of a seta; S5 with erect hairs broad at base ≤1 MOD. Hairs on vertex brown, &lt;1.5 MOD.</p>
            <p>Surface sculpture. Microsculpture absent on clypeus; weak lateral of lateral ocelli, on discs of mesoscutum and scutellum, T 7 and S6; distinct, surface somewhat dull elsewhere except strong and surface dull on metanotum, metapostnotum and sides of mesosoma. Clypeal punctures large, elongate, i&lt;d except almost impunctate apicomedially; supraclypeal area impunctate medially, rest of face and genal area punctures shallow but distinct i≤d, vertex less densely punctate i=0.5–3d; mesoscutum disc irregularly punctate i=1–6d, margins of mesoscutum more densely punctate i≤d, scutellum i=0.5–1.5d, metanotum densely punctate i&lt;0.5d; metapostnotum with a few radiating weak striae among crowded small punctures; mesopleuron punctures shallow obscure, metapleuron longitudinally rugoso-striate, propodeum with dense small punctures i&lt;0.5d; T 1 punctures distinct on anterior portion of disc i=1–2d, sparser posteriorly; T 2– T 4 punctures shallow obscure among microsculpture i&gt;d, T 5– T 7 punctures increasingly distinct, variable in size, i&gt;d except towards side of T 7 i&lt;d.</p>
            <p>Structure. Head shorter than wide (59:78); labrum almost twice as wide as long (38:20), basal box surface concave, apically strongly ridged, sides divergent, apical margin convex; labial palpomere 1 almost as long as remaining 3 combined (25:28); clypeus 2.5× as wide as long 80:32; interantennal to antennocular distances (29:22); malar area linear; supraclypeal area slightly more protuberant than clypeus in profile; anterior tentorial pit at junction of outer subantennal and epistomal sulci; epistomal lobe absent, epistomal sulcus straight from junction with inner subantennal sulcus to close to lateral clypeal margin; compound eyes ≈1.5× as long as wide (78:50), much wider than genal area in lateral view (32); inner margin of compound eyes weakly concave, strongly convergent below, upper to minimum to lower interocular distances (60:39:44); inner and outer subantennal sutures outwardly concave, subantennal sclerite widest above midlength 1.5× antennal socket diameter (15:10); frontal line weakly raised except depressed just above bluntly rounded process above lower tangent of antennal sockets; facial fovea deep, oval 1.5× longer than wide (6:4); interocellar distance half ocellocular distance (18:36); vertex strongly convex in frontal view; flagellum longer than width of head (90:78); flagellum unmodified, not crenulate; F1 length and width subequal (13:14); F2 shorter than wide (10:14); F3 shorter than wide (13:15); remaining flagellomeres with length and width subequal except F11 almost twice as long as wide (28:15).</p>
            <p>Mesoscutum length and intertegular widths subequal (40:42), median line more than half length of mesoscutum, distinct, ending in small deep oval depression; parapsidal line ≈¾ as long as tegula (15:19); scutellum:metanotum:metapostnotum (29:18:25); legs unmodified, meso- and metatibial spurs weakly curved, ciliate; inner and outer rami of tarsal claws subequal in length; lengths of posterior margins of submarginal cells subequal (28:26); both recurrent veins entering second submarginal cell, first much further from first submarginal cross vein than second is from second submarginal crossvein (9:5); stigma ≈2.5× longer than maximum width (26:10); marginal cell ≈3.5× longer than maximum width (48:14), apex truncate.</p>
            <p>T 1 shorter than apical width (33:44); apical impressed areas distinct, on T 2 as long as MOD; T 2 lateral fovea weak, obscure; T 2– T 4 strongly transversely depressed anteriorly; T 7 apex weakly concave; S1–S5 unmodified, S6 apically narrowly and weakly concave medially; S7 apical lobes subparallel to each other, irregularly and weakly narrowing posteriorly, apex briefly deflected ventrally; S8 apical lobe parallel-sided, apex broadly rounded; gonocoxa swollen at base of gonostylus medially; gonostylus fused to gonocoxa, in profile narrowing from base to acute apex, dorsal surface weakly concave, ventral surface convex; penis valves dorsoventrally flatened, gradually narrowed to acute apex.</p>
            <p>♀: Unknown.</p>
            <p>  HOLOTYPE: ♂, ARGENTINA, Tucumán,  Tafi de[l] Valle , sweep, 19.i.1996, M.J. Sharkey. The specimen is housed at the Packer Collection at York University (PCYU). </p>
            <p>ETYMOLOGY: The species name refers to unique hairs on S4 some of which are quadridigitate, like the hands of cartoon characters such as in the television series, “The Simpsons”. “Cheiro” being Ancient Greek for hand.</p>
            <p> COMMENTS: The town named as the type locality is slightly over 2000 m in altitude. This is lower than the altitudinal range for most species of the genus, although the two species of the  guarnensis species group are known from similar, or even lower, elevations (Gonzalez et al., 2013). </p>
            <p> The setation of S4 seems unique among all bees, although those of the following new species are similar. Some Eucerini bear unusually thickly branched hairs, but these are on the legs, such as on the ventral surface of the mesotibia of  Svastrides melanura (Spinola) (see Discussion, below). </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D4A37D83768E4BFEDFFAE2C37EFAD8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Packer, Laurence	Packer, Laurence (2021): Two new species of Andinopanurgus (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae: Panurginae), with a description of the female of A. amyae. Journal of Melittology 2021 (101): 1-19, DOI: 10.17161/jom.i101.13338, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/jom.i101.13338
03D4A37D83738E45FE27FAE2C51BFEF8.text	03D4A37D83738E45FE27FAE2C51BFEF8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Andinopanurgus lynnae Packer 2021	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Andinopanurgus lynnae Packer ,  new species</p>
            <p>ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 0325CDA1-C217-48BC-8316-D386B243BEE1</p>
            <p>(Figs. 9–15, 23, 24)</p>
            <p> DIAGNOSIS: Males of the new species can be differentiated from all other bees by the combination of unusual setal structure on S4 (Figs. 11–12) and a white transverse marking on the clypeus (Fig. 10). Only  A. chirosimpson has similarly unusual setae on S4 (Figs. 4–5) with short, thick forked setae, but that species has an entirely black clypeus (Fig. 2). The setal paterns are also different between the species (compare Figs. 4–5 with Figs. 11–12). The female has the following combination of character states that is unique among known females of the genus: antennal flagellum not crenulate, F1 clearly longer than F2 (Fig. 14), metatibia with white scopal hairs (Fig. 13), mesotibial spur as long as mesobasitarsus (Fig. 15), and pro- and mesotibiae lacking basodorsal pale mark (Fig. 13). It shares all but the last two features with  A. vargasllosai Gonzalez &amp; Alvarado which has the mesotibial spur 0.8× as long as the mesobasitarsus and pale marked pro- and mesotibiae. An additional difference between females of  A. lynnae and  A. vargasllosai is the length to width of the facial fovea,&gt;5: 1 in  A. lynnae versus 3.7: 1 in  A. vargasllosai . </p>
            <p>DESCRIPTION: ♂: Body length 5.4 mm, forewing length 4.2 mm, head width 1.42 mm., intertegular distance 0.85 mm.</p>
            <p>Coloration. Black to blackish-brown except as follows: dark red-brown on mandible, labrum, epistomal lobe, legs (except as noted below) and metasoma (except as noted below); orange-brown on pronotal lobe, apical impressed areas of metasomal terga; pale yellow-brown apicosubmedially on S6 and ventrally on F3–F11, area of flagellomere that is pale increasing from small subapical spot on F3 to entire ventral surface on F6–F10, F11 dark apicoventrally; lateral reflexed portions of metasomal terga and apical impressed areas of S1–S6 translucent pale brown; pale cream subapical transverse band on clypeus. Following parts yellow: narrow longitudinal stripe on protibia (absent for apical 1/5 th), small basodorsal spot on mesotibia. Wing veins dark brown to level of base of stigma, remaining veins and stigma pale brown; membranes very pale yellow-brown.</p>
            <p>Pubescence. Minute simple suberect hairs on mesoscutum, scutellum, metanotum and metasomal dorsum. Longer hairs pale brown erect with numerous short branches and sparse unless stated otherwise; longest ≈3 MOD basoventrally on mandible, lower paraocular area (hairs blackish along inner margin of compound eye), gena below (becoming shorter ≈1 MOD and dark brown above), scape, mesoscutum, scutellum, mesopleuron and profemur; ≈2 MOD on vertex posteriorly, mesosomal venter, and metafemur; short, less plumose and blackish on frontal and vertexal areas; 1.5 MOD on dorsolateral portion of propodeum. Metasoma hairs with branches mostly only on anterior surface of rachis &lt;1.5 MOD, longest on side of T 3; T 7 with whitish plumose apicomedially oriented dense hair patch ≈1 MOD; sterna with short subapressed hairs &lt;1 MOD, S1–S3, S5, and S6 with somewhat denser more erect hairs towards apex; S4 with highly modified setae, divided into two, three, five, or six branches.</p>
            <p>Surface sculpture. Body surface dull due to microsculpture except absent surface shiny on labrum, epistomal lobe and tegula and weak on apical impressed areas of metasomal terga and sterna; imbricate and somewhat shiny on face below antennal sockets, genal area below, lower half of metapleuron, metapostnotum, sides of propodeum and metasoma; coarsely imbricate on upper paraocular area, lower parts of frontal area, mesoscutum and metanotum; coarsely imbricate on upper part of frontal and on vertexal areas and mesopleuron. Macrosculpture: punctures shallow and obscure, on clypeus large, i=1–4d; on supraclypeal area small, almost absent on disc, i~d towards lateral margin; on subantennal sclerite small, irregularly spaced i=0.5–5d; lower paraocular area punctures irregular in size, i=1–2d; upper paraocular, frontal and vertexal areas punctures obscure among coarse microscupture, i=0.5–5d; mesoscutum punctures small, i=1–8d; scutellum punctures larger, i=0.2–3d; metanotum punctures obscure; hypoepimeral area densely punctate i~d; rest of mesopleuron punctures small, more distinct, i=2–5d; upper part of metapleuron longitudinally striate; lateral surface of propodeum impunctate below, sparsely punctate above i=2–4d; metapostnotum weakly and sparsely striate. Metasoma obscurely punctate, punctures increasingly distinct on more apical terga, on T 6 i&gt;4d on disc, i&gt;2d towards sides; T 7 i&gt;d; sternal punctures minute and sparse on disc, increasingly large and dense towards apex of each sternum and from S1–S5, on S2 i&gt;2d apically, on S5 i≥d; S6 almost impunctate.</p>
            <p>Structure. Head shorter than wide (67:73); labrum less than twice as wide as long (20:13), basal box surface concave, apically strongly ridged, sides strongly convergent, apical margin feebly convex; labial palpomeres 1–4: 12:10:10:7; clypeus more than twice as wide as long (80:37); interantennal distance considerably greater than antennocular distance (34:20); malar area linear; supraclypeal area angularly raised just below lower antennal socket tangent; anterior tentorial pit at junction of outer subantennal and epistomal sulci; epistomal lobe swollen ≈135˚; compound eye ≈1.6× as long as wide (78:48), wider than genal area in lateral view (31); inner margin of compound eyes weakly concave above, strongly convergent below, upper to minimum to lower interocular distances (73:50:57); inner and outer subantennal sutures outwardly concave, subantennal sclerite widest above midlength 1.5× antennal socket diameter (15:10); frontal line weakly raised except depressed just above bluntly rounded process above lower tangent of antennal sockets; facial fovea distinct, oval 2.5× as long as wide (7.5:3); interocellar distance less than half ocellocular distance (17:37); vertex swollen behind compound eyes, mostly transverse, weakly convex medially in frontal view; flagellum longer than width of head (88:73); flagellum unmodified, not crenulate; F1 almost twice as long as wide (17:9); remaining flagellomeres with length and width subequal except F11 almost twice as long as wide (23:12).</p>
            <p>Mesoscutum slightly shorter than intertegular width (39:42), median line more than half length of mesoscutum, distinct, ending in small oval deep depression; parapsidal line ≈1/2 as long as tegula (10:20); scutellum:metanotum:metapostnotum (27:14:20); legs unmodified, posterior metatibial spur more strongly curved than anterior spur and mesotibial spur, ciliate; inner and outer rami of tarsal claws subequal in length, claws bifid; posterior margin of first submarginal cell longer than second (28:24); both recurrent veins entering second submarginal cell, first further from first submarginal cross vein than second is from second submarginal crossvein (6:4); stigma almost 4× longer than maximum width (30:8); marginal cell ≈3.5× longer than maximum width (43:12), apex truncate.</p>
            <p>T 1 shorter than apical width (40:52); apical impressed areas gradually depressed from disc, on T 2 shorter than MOD (7.5:10); T 2 lateral fovea weak, elongate, L:W (8:3) T 2– T 4 narrowly and weakly transversely depressed anteriorly; T 7 apex concave; S1–S5 unmodified, S6 apically narrowly concave apicomedially; S8 apical lobe weakly laterally expanded before rounded apex; gonostylus obliquely flatened, gradually narrowing to acute apex [genitalia not dissected in the sole known specimen].</p>
            <p>♀: Body length 5.95 mm, forewing length 4.6 mm, head width 1.52 mm., intertegular distance 1.02 mm.</p>
            <p>Coloration. Black to blackish-brown except as follows: red-brown on apex of mandible pronotal lobe, tegula, legs (suffused with blackish), apical impressed areas of metasomal terga, area anterior to impressed area on T 3 and T 4, most of T 5, metasomal sterna (except apical impressed areas pale amber); ventral surface of F5–F10 pale orange-brown, pale area increasing in size from F5 to F9, F11 apex brown.</p>
            <p>Pubescence. Minute simple suberect hairs on mesoscutum, scutellum, metanotum, and metasomal dorsum. Longer hairs pale brown erect with numerous short branches and sparse unless stated otherwise; longest ≈3 MOD on medial surface of scape and mesopleuron; ≈2.5 MOD basoventrally on mandible, genal area below (becoming shorter ≈1.5 MOD above), scutellum and apicoventrally on profemur, metacoxa; &lt;2 MOD on lower paraocular area, vertexal area (where some hairs dark brown), mesoscutum, legs; shorter ≤1.5 MOD on metanotum and dorsolateral area of propodeum, ≤1.5 MOD and less plumose on frontal and vertexal areas. Metatibial scopal hairs mostly simple, long &lt;4 MOD. Metasomal tergal hairs with branches mostly only on anterior surface of rachis ≤1 MOD, except towards sides, prepygidial fimbria and T 6, plumose, longest on side of T 5 ≤2.5 MOD, prepygidial fimbria and T 6 hairs brown, ≤2 MOD and ≤1.5 MOD respectively; metasomal sternal hairs mostly with branches only on anterior surface of rachis, increasing in length from anterior to posterior on each sternum, longest hairs &lt;2 MOD; S5 with apical fringe of white appressed hairs ≈1.5 MOD.</p>
            <p>Surface sculpture. As in male except microsculpture generally weaker throughout; macrosculpture: punctures shallow and obscure, on clypeus large, i=1–5d; on supraclypeal area smaller, i=2–6d on disc, i≈d towards lateral margin; on subantennal sclerite small, irregularly spaced i≈d; lower paraocular area punctures irregular in size, i=1–6d; upper paraocular and frontal area punctures obscure, vertexal area i≥d; mesoscutum and scutellum punctures bimodal in size, minute punctures i&gt;d, larger punctures sparse; metanotum obscurely punctate; hypoepimeral area puncate-imbricate; rest of mesopleuron sparsely punctate i&gt;3d; upper part of metapleuron longitudinally weakly striate; side of propodeum impunctate below, sparsely punctate above i&gt;3d; metapostnotum with few longitudinal striae. Metasomal terga sparsely minutely punctate except T 5 i=2–5d on disc, i≈d subapically.</p>
            <p>Structure. Head shorter than wide (69:76); labrum ≈1.5× as wide as long (23:16), basal box surface concave, apically strongly ridged, sides strongly convergent, apical margin feebly convex, ridge U-shaped; [first labial palpomere almost as long as remaining three combined, labial palpomeres 1–4: 24:9:8:7.5]; clypeus &lt;2.5× as wide as long 48:21; interantennal distance slightly less than antennocular distance (18:21); malar area linear; supraclypeal area shallowly convex in profile; anterior tentorial pit just above junction of outer subantennal and epistomal sulci; epistomal lobe swollen ≈160˚; compound eye &lt;2× as long as wide (71:37), wider than genal area in lateral view (30); inner margin of compound eyes weakly concave above, strongly convergent below, upper to minimum to lower interocular distances (95:78:88); inner subantennal sulcus straight, outer subantennal sulci outwardly weakly concave, subantennal sclerite widest above midlength, ≈ antennal socket diameter (11:11); frontal line very short, weak; facial fovea distinct, parallel-sided, elongate ≈5× as long as wide (24:5), widest just below upper extremity; interocellar distance ≈0.5× ocellocular distance (19:36); frontal area weakly depressed above antennal sockets and below median ocellus, upper paraocular area weakly depressed; vertex swollen behind compound eyes, transverse in anterior view; flagellum length subequal to head width; F1 more than twice as long as wide (19:7); remaining flagellomeres with length and width subequal except F11 ≈1.5× as long as wide (20:13).</p>
            <p>Mesoscutum shorter than intertegular width (70:83), median line more than half length of mesoscutum; parapsidal line 1/2 as long as tegula (10:20); scutellum:metan otum:metapostnotum (30:15:22); legs unmodified, mesotibial spur straight, as long as mesobasitarsus, with three long teeth, almost as long as mesobasitarsus (43:46); metatibial spurs strongly sclerotized, anterior spur more strongly curved and less weakly serrate than posterior one; tarsal claws with long tooth arising at or before midlength; posterior margin of first submarginal cell slightly longer than second (54:51); both recurrent veins entering second submarginal cell, first ~ twice as far from first submarginal cross vein than second is from second submarginal crossvein (15:8); stigma ≈4× longer than maximum width (53:13); marginal cell ≈4.5× longer than maximum width (49:13), apex truncate.</p>
            <p>T 1 apical width ≈1.5× length (63:43); apical impressed areas distinct, on T 2 1.5× MOD; [T 2 lateral fovea distinct, elongate, L:W 27:6, acutely narrowed anteriorly]; T 2– T 4 not noticeably transversely depressed anteriorly; pygidial plate weakly convex laterally, sides forming angle of ≈45˚, apex rounded, surface raised medially sides of raised area concave; S6 with glabrous thickened apical lip, apex weakly convex.</p>
            <p>  TYPE MATERIAL: ♂, PERU, Cusco,  Picol , 3782m, 12.ii.2005, L.S. Kimsey, malaise trap;  allotype and second female paratype, same data as holotype. All specimens will be housed at the R. M. Bohart Musem of Entomology,  University of California , Davis. </p>
            <p>ETYMOLOGY: The specific epithet honours two people, Lynn Sophie Gail Quesney, the author’s grandaughter, and Lynn Kimsey, the well known hymenopterist who collected the only known specimens of the species.</p>
            <p> COMMENTS: The setation on S4 of the male is unique, though clearly shares some features with  A. chirosimpson described above. </p>
            <p> The female seems, superficially at least, similar to that of  A. vargasllosai . </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D4A37D83738E45FE27FAE2C51BFEF8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Packer, Laurence	Packer, Laurence (2021): Two new species of Andinopanurgus (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae: Panurginae), with a description of the female of A. amyae. Journal of Melittology 2021 (101): 1-19, DOI: 10.17161/jom.i101.13338, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/jom.i101.13338
03D4A37D837D8E43FED6FEC2C2ACFA5B.text	03D4A37D837D8E43FED6FEC2C2ACFA5B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Andinopanurgus amyae (Gonzalez & Engel 2011)	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Female of  Andinopanurgus amyae (Gonzalez &amp; Engel)</p>
            <p>(Figs. 16–20, 24)</p>
            <p>DIAGNOSIS: This is the only species of the genus in which the female has the hypostomal carina remarkably sinuate, concave anteriorly, more strongly convex posteriorly (Fig. 18).</p>
            <p>DESCRIPTION: ♀: Body length 8.7 mm, wing length 7.2 mm, intertegular distance 1.8 mm, head width 2.48 mm.</p>
            <p>Coloration. Body entirely black to blackish-brown except as follows: much of face except clypeus and supraclypeal area, vertex and hypoepimeral area with weak bronze-green reflections; red-brown subapical mark on mandible, dark orange-brown apical impressed areas of metasomal terga and dark yellow-brown apical impressed areas of metasomal sterna; wing membranes pale yellow-brown, veins mostly brown.</p>
            <p>Pubescence. Black to blackish-brown and with numerous short branches unless stated otherwise: on face, scape, thoracic dorsum, profemur posteriorly, and metasomal venter ≤2.5 MOD, somewhat shorter on mesopleuron above; paler brown on genal area, paler brown and longer on mesosomal venter and metacoxa ≤4 MOD; short &lt;1 MOD and brown on posterior margin of pronotum, shorter &lt;0.7 MOD on metanotum, somewhat longer on propodeum ≈1 MOD. Tibial scopal hairs black, simple ≈3 MOD. Scatered brown hairs on metasomal terga &lt;2 MOD except longer towards sides of T 5 ≈3 MOD; prepygidial fimbria dark brown ≈2.5 MOD.</p>
            <p>Surface sculpture. Microsculpture imbricate unless stated otherwise; absent on clypeus and disc of supraclypeal area, increasingly strong dorsally, area around median ocellus dull; weak on genal area, shiny; stronger on hypostomal area, dull; strong and dull on mesosoma except somewhat shiny towards sides of disc of scutellum and metanotum; metapostnotum somewhat more shiny; metasomal terga weakly imbricate, strongly shiny; metasomal sterna more distinctly imbricate. Clypeal punctures large, elongate i≤d; supraclypeal area with a few obscure large punctures medially, more distinctly punctate laterally and above i≤d; subantennal sclerite and lower paraocular area punctures small i≤d; frontal area punctures small, dense i&lt;0.5d, smaller and crowded around median ocellus; vertexal area punctures larger, sparser i&gt;0.5d, larger and sparser still towards sides i=1–5d; mesoscutum densely and minutely punctate i≈d; scutellum and metanotum less regularly punctate i=0.5–2d; metapostnotum with a few radiating weak incomplete striae; mesopleuron punctures shallow obscure, more distinct below i=0.5–2d; metapleuron and propodeum punctures minute obscure; T 1– T 4 almost impunctate, T 5 punctures increasing in size and density posteriorly, i=3–8d towards base, i&lt;d towards apex; S2–S5 punctures distinct, mostly i&gt;2d; S5 more strongly and densely punctate i&lt;3d basally, i≤d apically; S6 punctures scatered minute on disc, with apicolateral oval densely punctate area.</p>
            <p>Structure. Head shorter than wide (48:62); labrum ≈1.5× as wide than long (38:25), basal box surface concave, sides convex, converging ventrally, apical margin strongly convex except narrowly transverse apically; labial palpomere 1 longer than remaining 3 combined, lengths of palpomeres 1–4 (34:12:8:7) respectively; clypeus almost 3× as wide as long (90:31); supraclypeal area strongly convex; anterior tentorial pit just above and lateral to junction of epistomal and outer antennal sulci; outer subantennal sulcus outwardly concave, inner subantennal sulcus outwardly convex, subantennal sclerite widest near base, somewhat wider than antennal socket (13:11); interantennal to antennocular distances (19:24); frontal fovea D-shaped, outer margin straight, twice as long as greatest width which is near midlength (14:29); malar area short, maximum length ≈0.5 MOD; compound eyes almost twice as long as wide (61:32), subequal to width of genal area in lateral view (30); inner margin of compound eyes convex, divergent below, upper to minimum to lower interocular distances (94:85:106); frontal line carinate above, a rounded weak ridge below; interocellar distance less than half ocellocular distance (12:29); vertex weakly convex in frontal view; hypostomal carina strongly sinuate, concave anteriorly, strongly convex and lamellate posteriorly; flagellum shorter than width of head (58:62); F1 more than twice as long as wide (20:9); remaining flagellomeres with length and width subequal except F3 shorter than wide (10:14) and F10 almost twice as long as wide (21:11); F1–F5 weakly crenulate.</p>
            <p>Mesoscutum shorter than wide (36:44), median line almost as long as mesoscutum, distinct, ending in small deep oval depression; parapsidal line ≈2/3 as long as tegula (25:37); scutellum:metanotum:metapostnotum (27:18:19); legs unmodified, mesotibial spur with seven long teeth; lengths of posterior margins of submarginal cells equal (49:49); both recurrent veins entering second submarginal cell, both far removed from respective submarginal cross veins; stigma narrow almost 5× longer than maximum width (50:11); marginal cell almost 4× longer than maximum width (78:20), apex broadly rounded, removed from costal margin.</p>
            <p>T 1 much shorter than apical width (70:108); apical impressed areas distinct, on T 2 ≈2 MOD (20:10); pygidial plate narrowing to broadly rounded apex; medial raised area triangular, apex acute; metasomal sterna apical impressed areas indistinct short, on S2 &lt;1 MOD, except distinct on S5 ≈1 MOD; S6 raised sublaterally delimiting oval densely punctate area.</p>
            <p>  MATERIAL EXAMINED: ♀, ECUADOR, Napo,  Termas de Papallacta , 00˚21’29”S 78˚08’52”W, 3520m, 3–4.iii.2005  ,  YPT, L. Masner, elfin forest (PCYU). </p>
            <p> COMMENTS: There are two species of the genus hitherto known only from males from precisely the area of provenance of this female. These are  A. wayruronga and  A. amyae . The type locality of the later is less than 20 km from the locality of the paratype of the former (the holotype locality cannot be discerned precisely from the label data). Both are from between the Termas de Papallacta and halfway between Papallacta and Baeza to the East. The female described herein as belonging to  A. amyae is from the higher elevation more western locality, whereas the paratype male of that species is from ~ 1000 m lower down and slightly to the east. Based upon the structure of the female hypostomal area, I believe this specimen belongs to the later species because its male is the only one with an angulation to the hypostomal carina (Gonzalez &amp; Engel, 2011: fig. 4), the female has a strong convexity in the same place, a feature otherwise unknown in the genus and the details of the shape of the carina are remarkably similar (compare Fig. 18 herein with figure 4 in Gonzalez &amp; Engel, 2011). Figure 23 shows the normal, straight hypostomal carina generally found in the genus. </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D4A37D837D8E43FED6FEC2C2ACFA5B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Packer, Laurence	Packer, Laurence (2021): Two new species of Andinopanurgus (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae: Panurginae), with a description of the female of A. amyae. Journal of Melittology 2021 (101): 1-19, DOI: 10.17161/jom.i101.13338, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/jom.i101.13338
03D4A37D837B8E41FEFEFA62C59CF954.text	03D4A37D837B8E41FEFEFA62C59CF954.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Andinopanurgus Gonzalez & Engel 2011	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Modifications for Identification Keys for  Andinopanurgus</p>
            <p> Insertion of the following couplets at the beginning of Gonzalez et al.’s (2019) key for  Andinopanurgus males will enable the newly described species to be identified: </p>
            <p>A. S4 with highly modified branched setae, some of which are rake or trident-like (Figs. 4–5, 13–14) ........................................................................................................ B</p>
            <p>—. S4 without highly modified setae, S5 sometimes with unusually structured setae ............................................... couplet 1 (page 215) of Gonzalez et al. (2019)</p>
            <p> B(A). Clypeus black, lacking apical transverse cream-colored band; S4 setae with from two to four branches (Figs. 4–5) [Argentina] ...........  A. chirosimpson ,  n. sp.</p>
            <p> —. Clypeus with apical transverse cream-colored band; S4 setae with from two to five branches (Figs. 11–12) [Peru] .............................................  A. lynnae ,  n. sp.</p>
            <p> Insertion of the following couplet at the beginning of Gonzalez et al.’s (2019) key for  Andinopanurgus females will enable identification of the female of  A. amyae : </p>
            <p> A. Hypostomal carina strongly sinuate, concave anteriorly, strongly convex posteriorly (Fig. 18) ...........................................................  A. amyae (Gonzalez &amp; Engel)</p>
            <p>—. Hypostomal carina linear (Fig. 23) ............ couplet 1 of Gonzalez et al. (2019: 216).</p>
            <p> For identification of the female of  A. lynnae , the following modifications are required to Gonzalez et al.’s (2019) key: </p>
            <p>4. Metatibial scopal hairs whitish (Fig. 13) .............................................................. 4A</p>
            <p>—. Metatibial scopal hairs brown-black (Fig. 16) ........................................................... ....................................................................... couplet 5 in Gonzalez et al. (2019: 216)</p>
            <p> 4A. Metasomal terga with apical impressed areas translucent, area immediately anterior to apical impressed areas somewhat orange clearly differing from dark brown of discs of terga (Gonzalez et al., 2019: figs. 1b-d); facial fovea ≈3.7× longer than wide; mesotibial spur ≈0.8× length of mesobasitarsus .............................. ...........................................................................  A. vargasllosai Gonzalez &amp; Alvarado</p>
            <p> —. Metasomal terga with apical impressed areas red-brown, areas immediately anterior to apical impressed areas almost concolorous to discs of terga (Fig. 13); facial fovea ≈5× longer than maximum width; mesotibial spur ≈0.95× as long as mesobasitarsus (Fig. 15) ....................................................................  A. lynnae ,  n. sp.</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D4A37D837B8E41FEFEFA62C59CF954	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Packer, Laurence	Packer, Laurence (2021): Two new species of Andinopanurgus (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae: Panurginae), with a description of the female of A. amyae. Journal of Melittology 2021 (101): 1-19, DOI: 10.17161/jom.i101.13338, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/jom.i101.13338
