identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03CA441B361CFF8C9DF4F908FBF8FB87.text	03CA441B361CFF8C9DF4F908FBF8FB87.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Neoasterocheres	<div><p>Neoasterocheres gen. nov.</p><p>Diagnosis. Asterocheridae . Body dorsoventrally flattened. Prosome ovoid or discoid, urosome cylindrical and 4- segmented in female. Antennule of female basically 19-segmented with large aesthetasc on 17th segment; ancestral segments IX–XIII fused; distal 3 segments frequently fused to become 1 or 2 segments. Antenna with 1-segmented exopod and 3-segmented endopod bearing distal claw. Oral cone short or elongated, siphon-like. Mandible consisting of stylet and 1- or 2-segmented palp bearing two distal setae. Maxillule bilobed. Maxilla 2-segmented; distal segment forming curved claw. Maxilliped with 6-segmented. Legs 1–4 with 3-segmented exopod and endopod. Free segment of leg 5 with 2 or 3 setae.</p><p>Remarks. Kim (2010) proposed a new definition for Asterocheres, with the main diagnostics characters related to leg setation and number of antennule segments posteriorly to aesthetasc. Thus, the author restricted the number of valid species in Asterocheres and many species were considered as species inquirendae. Since then, new species of Asterocheres were described (Crescenti et al. 2010; Varela 2010, 2012; Kim &amp; Min 2013) and redescriptions were published (Conradi &amp; Bandera 2011; Bandera &amp; Conradi 2013; Bandera &amp; Conradi 2014). Although the new species being described shows the leg setation established by Kim for Asterocheres, the antennule segmentation highlights a relevant difference in the fusion pattern. Neoasterocheres gen. nov. can be distinguished from Asterocheres by having the fusion of antennule ancestral segments IX–XIII resulting in the aesthetasc located on the 17th segment, with 3 distal segments frequently fused to become 1 or 2. Kim (2010) stated that the female antennule is basically 21-segmented because depending on the existence of distal fusions the amount of segments can be reduced to 19, however these fusions occurs between the last 3 segments, which are posterior to ancestral segment XXI. When Kim (2010) established that the aesthetasc is located on segment 18 in Asterocheres, the author excluded the possibility of occurrence of other additional fusions previous to the 18th segment, and disregarded the existence of species presenting fusions of additional ancestral segments.</p><p>According to Huys &amp; Boxshall (1991) on the ancestral pattern of a siphonostome antennule, segment XXI is characterized by the presence of an aesthetasc additional to the maximum armature of two setae found in an unfused segment. Therefore, the authors highlighted the presence of a group of setae on ancestral segment IX, thus indicating a fusion involving at least segments IX–XII. This is expressed in a maximum of 8 setae present on the segment and the existence of eight free single segments between this compound segment (IX–XII) and the one bearing the aesthetasc (XXI). The presence of less than eight free segments between these two landmarks indicates the occurrence of further fusions in the section. Besides that, a spine is commonly present on ancestral segment XIV, and may constitute another relevant landmark. In Asterocheres we found a segment between the compound segment (IX–XII) and the segment bearing a spine (XIV), thus indicating that ancestral XIII segment is free. In the new genus the segment with a spine (XIV) is close to the compound segment (IX–XII). The ancestral segment XIII is not free, it is fused with the previous segment (IX–XII). This pattern can be confirmed by the existence of only seven free segments between the original IX–XII and the XXI, and by the absence of any double segment between these two landmarks, which would be indicated by the presence of four setae and a segment with a length twice its regular size.</p><p>In addition, the new genus shows characters that differ from the remaining asterocherid genera. Bythocheres Humes, 1998, Cheramomyzon Humes, 1989, Collocheres Canu, 1893, Collocherides Stock, 1971, Dermatomyzon Claus, 1889, Discopontius Nicholls, 1944, Gerulusosacculus Ivanenko &amp; Defaye, 2004, Glyptocheres Humes, 1987, Ophiurocheres Humes, 1998, Meandromyzon Stock, 1989, Rhyncomyzon Giesbrecht, 1895 and Thermocheres Kim, 2010 share an urosomite with 3 post-genital urosomites in the female (Claus 1889; Canu 1893; Giesbrecht 1895; Nicholls 1944; Stock 1971, 1989; Humes 1987, 1988, 1989, 1998; Ivanenko &amp; Defaye 2004; Kim 2010) instead of two as observed in the new genus. The tergites of the third pedigerous somite are not expanded posteriorly over rest of prosome in Neoasterocheres gen. nov. as it is seen in Phyllocheres (Humes 1996b) . Both Discopontius Nicholls, 1944 and Meandromyzon coronatum Stock, 1989 have 2 post-genital segments like Neoasterocheres n. gen., but Discopontius has a 2-segmented P4 endopod and M. coronatum has a 1- segmented mandibular palp, both characters diverging from those observed in Neoasterocheres n. sp. (Nicholls 1944, Stock 1989).</p><p>Chelacheres has a claw-like element distally on the antennary endopod (Stock &amp; Humes 1995), which is absent in the new genus. Neoasterocheres gen. nov. differs from Cephalocheres Kim, 2010, Humesimyzon Kim, 2010 and Mimacheres Leigh-Sharpe, 1934 once it does not show reduction or absence of the antennary exopod to a single seta (Leigh-Sharpe 1934; Kim 2010) or the 2-segmented condition as described in Humescheres Kim, 2005 (Kim 2005) . The mandibular palp is 1-segmented or absent in Asteropontella Stock, 1989, Asteropontius Thompson &amp; Scott, 1903, Asteropontopsis Stock, 1987, Gascardama Kim, 2010, Hetairosyna Humes, 1991, Hetairosynopsis Humes, 1996 and Stenomyzon Kim, 2010 (Thompson &amp; Scott 1903; Stock 1987, 1989; Humes 1991, 1996a; Kim 2010) and 2-segmented with 1 seta in Parasterocheres Humes, 1996 (Humes 1996b) while a 2- segmented palp with 2 distal setae is found in Neoasterocheres gen. nov. Hetairosynella Kim, 2010 possesses five setae on the inner maxillulary lobe (Kim 2010) instead of four as in Neoasterocheres n. gen. Stockmyzon Bandera &amp; Huys, 2008 shows a five-segmented maxilliped (Bandera &amp; Huys 2008) differencing from Neoasterocheres gen. nov. The new genus can also be distinguished by its possession of a biramous P4 with 3-segmented exopod and endopod. This condition diverges from Cletopontius Thompson &amp; Scott, 1903, Cyclocheres Kim, 2010, Cystomyzon Stock, 1981, Discopontius Nicholls, 1944, Kolocheres Johnsson, 1999, Obesiella Ridewood, 1903, Oedomyzon Stock, 1981, Peltomyzon Stock, 1975, Siphonopontius Malt, 1991 and Tuphacheres Stock, 1965 (Ridewood 1903; Thompson &amp; Scott 1903; Nicholls 1944; Stock 1965, 1975a, 1981; Malt 1991; Johnsson 1999a; Kim 2010). In addition, Neoasterocheres gen. nov. has two inner setae on the second endopodal segments of all legs, thus diverging from Cecidomyzon Stock, 1981, Gomumucheres Humes, 1996, Hermacheres Stock, 1987, Indomyzon Ummerkutty, 1966, Inermocheres Boxshall, 1990, Onychocheres Stock &amp; Gooding, 1986, Psilomyzon Stock, 1965, Scottocheres Giesbrecht, 1897, Sinopontius Giesbrecht, 1897 and Tychomyzon Humes, 1991, all with the second endopodal segments of at least one leg armed with one inner seta (Giesbrecht 1897; Ummerkutty 1966; Stock &amp; Gooding 1986; Boxshall 1990; Humes 1991, 1996b; Stock, 1965, 1975a, 1981, 1987). Neoasterocheres gen. nov. differs from Acontiophorus Brady, 1880, Asterocheroides Malt, 1991, Asteropontoides Stock, 1975, Hammatimyzon Stock, 1981, Mesocheres Norman &amp; Scott, 1905, Orecturus Humes, 1992, Paracontiophorus Eiselt, 1961 and Parasteropontius Johnsson, 1999 by carrying five elements on the third endopodal segment of leg 4 (Brady 1880; Norman &amp; Scott 1905; Eiselt 1961; Stock 1975b, 1981; Malt 1991; Humes 1992; Johnsson 1999b). Laperocheres Ivanenko, 1999 lacks an inner seta on the first exopodal segment of legs 1–4 (Ivanenko 1999) while these setae are present in Neoasterocheres gen. nov. Neoasterocheres gen. nov. can be distinguished from Monocheres Stock, 1966 by the presence of a free one-segment of leg 5 (Stock 1966a) and additionally differs from Doropontius Thompson &amp; Scott, 1903 which possess a two-segmented leg 5 (Thompson &amp; Scott 1903).</p><p>Further, some of the species treated as valid Asterocheres by Kim (2010) share the antennulary fusion pattern herein defined as belonging to Neoasterocheres gen. nov. So, we propose that six species, i.e., A. enewetakensis Humes, 1997, A. dysideae Humes, 1996, A. rotundus Malt, 1991, A. scutatus Stock, 1966 and A. serrulatus (Humes, 1996) are transferred to the new genus. Asterocheres humesi Varela, 2012 was described posteriorly to Kim´s work and also have this fusion pattern in the antennule (Varela 2012) and should be in Neoasterocheres gen. nov.</p><p>Etymology. The name ‘ Neoasterocheres ’ is a combination of ‘neo’ (from the Greek adjective meaning ‘new’) and Asterocheres, referring to the similarities between the new genus and its congener.</p><p>Type species by original designation: Neoasterocheres breviseta sp. nov.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CA441B361CFF8C9DF4F908FBF8FB87	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Canário, Roberta;Rocha, Carlos Eduardo Falavigna Da;Neves, Elizabeth;Johnsson, Rodrigo	Canário, Roberta, Rocha, Carlos Eduardo Falavigna Da, Neves, Elizabeth, Johnsson, Rodrigo (2017): A new asterocherid genus (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida) associated with Callyspongia Duchassaing & Michelotti and reassessment of six species of Asterocheres Boeck. Zootaxa 4247 (2): 101-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4247.2.1
03CA441B361EFF899DF4FA39FAD2F8D5.text	03CA441B361EFF899DF4FA39FAD2F8D5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Neoasterocheres breviseta	<div><p>Neoasterocheres breviseta sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs. 2–3)</p><p>Material examined. Holotype female (UFBA 3178) and paratype female (UFBA 3179), Yacht Club Bay (12o59’975’’S, 38o31’851’’W), located in Todos-os-Santos Bay, Salvador city, in Bahia State , Brazil, on November 25th, 2014. All specimens were found associated with Callyspongia sp.</p><p>Description of the female. Mean body length (excluding caudal setae) 393 µm and mean body width 202 µm. Body (Fig. 2 A) cyclopiform with prosome slightly enlarged and dorso-ventrally flattened; urosome cylindrical. Pedigerous somite 1 completely fused to cephalosome to form cephalothorax with pointed epimera. Pedigerous somite 2 with slightly pointed epimera. Pedigerous somites 3 and 4 with rounded epimera.</p><p>Prosome 253 µm long and 200 µm width. Length: width ratio = 1.2:1. Prosome: urosome ratio of length 1.4:1. Urosome (Fig. 2 B) 4-segmented. Genital double-somite 72 µm long, maximum width 50 µm, length: width ratio = 1.5:1, rounded anterolaterally, with posterior epimera pointed. Two postgenital somites, both wider than long (25 × 31 µm, 18 × 31 µm, respectively), length: width ratio 0.8:1 and 0.6:1 respectively, lateral margins naked, with pointed epimera. Caudal rami slightly longer than wide, 17 × 12 µm armed with six setae (seta I absent); setae II, VI and VII naked and setae III, IV and V plumose.</p><p>Antennule (Fig. 2 C) 125 µm long (not including apical setae), 19-segmented. Length of segments: 19, 8, 3, 6, 4, 4, 5, 6, 6, 5, 3, 7, 6, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10 and 4 µm, respectively. Segmental homologies and armature as follows: 1(I)-2; 2(II)-2; 3(III)-2; 4(IV)-2; 5(V)-1; 6(VI)-2; 7(VII)-2; 8(VIII)-2; 9(IX–XIII)-7; 10(XIV)-2; 11(XV)-2; 12(XVI)-1; 13(XVII)-1; 14(XVIII)-1; 15(XIX)-1; 16(XX)-0; 17(XXI)-1+ae; 18(XXII–XXV)-3; 19(XXVI–XXVIII)-5; all setae smooth. Aesthetasc 45 µm long. Segments 9 and 18 with marks indicating fusions of ancestral segments IX– XII and XIII and XXII–XXIII and XXIV–XXV.</p><p>Antenna (Fig. 2 D) 97 µm long (including distal claw), with basis 16 µm long and totally naked. Exopod 1- segmented, 4 µm long with two short apical setae. Endopod 3-segmented, first segment 21 µm long, unarmed; second segment 6 µm long, armed with small distal naked seta; third segment 7 µm long with two setae, one distal and other subdistal near curved claw (25 µm long).</p><p>Oral cone 88 µm long, reaching to maxillipedal basis. Mandible (Fig. 2 E) with slender 2-segmented palp; measuring 16 and 10 µm long, respectively; second segment with two distal smooth setae. Mandibular stylet 66 µm long, proximally stout, tapering distally into a narrow sharpened ending.</p><p>Maxillule (Fig. 2 F) bilobed; both lobes armed with three setae and with row of setules on inner margins. Inner lobe, 23 µm long armed with short, distally plumose setae. Outer lobe 15 µm long with two long setae and a shorter one. Maxilla (Fig. 2 G) 180 µm long, consisting of syncoxa and long curved claw, with 42 and 138 µm long, respectively.</p><p>Maxilliped (Fig. 3 A) 6-segmented, 107 µm long; syncoxa 30 µm long, unarmed; basis 45 µm long with long setules on inner margin and few setules on distal outer margin. Endopod 4-segmented, segments measuring 7; 4; 8 and 13 µm, respectively; first and second segment unarmed; third segment with small seta medially; fourth segment with distal seta near straight claw-like element distally curved, 26 µm long.</p><p>Legs 1–4 (Figs. 3 B–E) biramous, with 3-segmented rami. Armature formula as follows:</p><p>Spine of first exopodal segment of leg 1 longer than others, reaching beyond insertion of first spine of third exopodal segment. Distal inner margin of third endopodal segment with long tooth, setation 1–5 (Fig. 3 B). Second endopodal segments of legs 2–4 with lateral margin bifurcate. Coxa of leg 4 with very small naked seta, basis of leg 4 unarmed. Outer setae and distal setae of third endopodal segments of all swimming legs reduced in size.</p><p>Fifth leg (Fig. 2 B) with free segment armed with three smooth setae. Fifth pedigerous somite with small seta near insertion of free segment.</p><p>Male. unknown.</p><p>Type locality. Yacht Club Bay (12o59’975’’S, 38o31’851’’W), located in Todos-os-Santos Bay, Salvador city, in Bahia State , Brazil.</p><p>Etymology. The specific name ‘ breviseta’ is a combination of Latin words ‘brevis’ (= short) and ‘seta’ (= bristle), referring to the small size of the endopodal setae of the third endopodal segments of legs 1–4.</p><p>Discussion. Neoasterocheres breviseta sp. nov. has 19-segmented antennule as its congeners but can be distinguished from N. dysidea, N. eniwetakensis, N. humesi, N. rotundus and N. serrulatus by having of a 6- segmented maxilliped, thus diverging from the 5-segmented condition found in these other species (Malt 1991; Humes 1996a, 1996b, 1997; Varela 2012). In addition, N. breviseta sp. nov. differs from N. scutatus by having 3 setae on both maxillary lobes instead 4 as observed in both maxillary lobes of N. scutatus (Stock 1966b) . The reduced size of the setae of the third endopodal segment of legs 1–4 and the reduction of the body length are also other unique features of the new species. Neoasterocheres breviseta sp. nov. has body length of less than 400 µm, clearly the smallest species of the genus; the body size of its congeners is over 720 µm (as in N. humesi).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CA441B361EFF899DF4FA39FAD2F8D5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Canário, Roberta;Rocha, Carlos Eduardo Falavigna Da;Neves, Elizabeth;Johnsson, Rodrigo	Canário, Roberta, Rocha, Carlos Eduardo Falavigna Da, Neves, Elizabeth, Johnsson, Rodrigo (2017): A new asterocherid genus (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida) associated with Callyspongia Duchassaing & Michelotti and reassessment of six species of Asterocheres Boeck. Zootaxa 4247 (2): 101-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4247.2.1
03CA441B361AFF859DF4FF09FDBFFBA3.text	03CA441B361AFF859DF4FF09FDBFFBA3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Neoasterocheres serrulatus (Humes 1996) Humes 1996	<div><p>Neoasterocheres serrulatus (Humes, 1996) n. comb.</p><p>(Figs. 4–5)</p><p>Madacheres serrulatus Humes, 1996</p><p>Asterocheres serrulatus (Humes, 1996)</p><p>Material examined. Female holotype (USNM 268463), in 2m, associated with Galaxea fascicularis (L.), west of Pte. Mahatsinjo, Nosy Bé, northwestern Madagascar, January 31 th 1964.</p><p>Description of the female. Body length (excluding caudal setae) 1147 µm, width 853 µm. Body cyclopiform (Fig. 4 A), prosome slightly wider than long with sensiles on dorsal surface, urosome cylindrical. First pedigerous somite completely fused to cephalosome to form cephalothorax and showing epimera projected. Pedigerous somite 2 to 4 with rounded epimera and gradually reducing on width. Pedigerous somite 4 partially overlapped by third somite, almost entirely covering fifth pedigerous somite. Prosome length: width ratio = 0.9:1. Prosome: urosome ratio of length = 1.8:1.</p><p>Urosome (Fig. 4 B) 4-segmented. Genital double-somite as long as wide, with widest portion located medially on region of genital pores. Genital apertures ventral, with two short setae, lateral margins with row of setules close to genital pores. First post-genital somite as long as wide. Anal somite 1.5 times wider than long. Both post-genital somites showing posterior margin serrated and lateral margins covered with setules. Caudal rami slightly longer than wide with posterior margin serrated and bearing tooth-like projection (Fig. 4 C), armed with six setae, seta I absent, setae II to VII present. All setae plumose.</p><p>Antennule (Fig. 4 D) 519 µm long (not including setae), 19-segmented. Length of segments: 50, 13, 17, 17, 10, 13, 10, 13, 13, 20, 23, 27, 47, 57, 47, 37, 67, 33 and 47 µm respectively. Segmental homologies and armature as follows: 1(I)-2; 2(II)-2; 3(III)-2; 4(IV)-2; 5(V)-2; 6(VI)-2; 7(VII)-2; 8(VIII)-2; 9(IX-XIII)-6; 10(XIV)-1+spine; 11(XV)-2; 12(XVI)-1; 13(XVII)-2; 14(XVIII)-2; 15(XIX)-1; 16(XX)-1; 17(XXI)-1+ae; 18(XXII–XXIII)-2; 19(XXVI–XXVIII)-6; all setae smooth. Aesthetasc 167 µm long.</p><p>Antenna (Fig. 4 E) 290 µm long (including distal claw). Coxa and basis unarmed. Basis 84 µm long. Exopod one-segmented, 14 µm long, with two short apical and one lateral setae. Endopod 3-segmented, first segment 79 µm long, unarmed, with row of setules on outer margin; second segment 14 µm long, with medial naked seta; third segment 9 µm long, with two distal setae near thin claw distally curved (73 µm long).</p><p>Oral cone (Fig. 4 A) 247 µm long, siphon-like, reaching to maxillipedal basis. Mandible (Fig. 4 F) with slender 2-segmented palp; measuring 98 and 34 µm long, respectively, both with setules covering outer margins; second segment with two distal smooth setae. Mandibular stylet 229 µm long, proximally stout, tapering distally into a narrow sharpened ending.</p><p>Maxillule (Fig. 4 G) bilobed; outer lobe, 40 µm long, armed with three smooth setae; inner lobe 107 µm long, armed with four distal smooth setae. Maxilla (Fig. 5 A) 340 40 µm long, consisting of long and narrow syncoxa and long narrow curved claw, with 156 and 190 µm long, respectively.</p><p>Maxilliped (Fig. 5 B) 5-segmented, 440 µm long; syncoxa 110 µm long, armed with inner smooth seta; basis 150 µm long, unarmed. Endopod three-segmented, segments measuring 8, 14 and 58 µm, respectively; each segment armed with one seta distally. Third segment with distal seta located close to straight claw-like element, 100 µm long.</p><p>Legs 1–4 (Fig. 5 C–F) biramous, with 3-segmented rami. Armature formula as follows:</p><p>Spine of first exopodal segment of leg 1 reaching distal margin of second exopodal segment. Third exopodal segment of leg 1 armed distally with spine and seta. Third endopodal segment of legs 2 to 4 with seta and spine distally. Distal spine of third exopodal segment of leg 4 with setules on inner margin. Fifth leg (Fig. 5 G) with free segment armed with two setae and rows of setules on lateral margins. Fifth pedigerous somite with single seta near insertion of free segment.</p><p>Male. Unknown.</p><p>Discussion. The redescription show some inconsistences between the characteristics observed here and the original description of Neoasterocheres serrulatus made by Humes (1996a). The first concerning the second endopodal segment of the antenna that has only a seta instead three cited by Humes (1996a). In the original description, Humes (1996a) mentioned the siphon reaching near insertion of leg 1, however the siphon is little short, reaching the maxilliped. The maxilliped possesses a seta on the coxa, not observed by Humes (1996a). Humes (1996a) also misinterpreted the maxilla when quoted a suture on the median portion of claw, which was not observed. Humes (1996a) described the third exopodal segment of leg 1 as having two distal setae instead a seta and a spine observed here. According Humes (1996a) the third segment of leg 2 has two setae on distal portion but this segment show a seta and a spine distally. Humes (1996a) depicted this species as possessing two terminal spines on third endopodal segments of legs 3 and 4. However, the reported armature setation for the swimming legs, these segments appeared as having a seta and a spine distally, a condition observed in this revision. Another difference observed regards the number of setae on leg 5, which has two setae instead three as described by Humes (1996a).</p><p>Among the major problems related previously with the original description of the genus by Humes (1996a) is the fact that the characters used to justify the status of Madacheres as a genus does not support it, because it is not possible to effectively differentiate Madacheres from Neoasterocheres . This situation has been observed by Ivanenko (1999) and confirmed by Kim (2010).</p><p>Distribution. Neoasterocheres gen. nov. is cosmopolitan, although restricted to the tropical region. Its members are known to occur in the Indian, Indo-Pacific and Atlantic Oceans. Neoasterocheres enewetakensis, N. dysidea and N. rotundus are recorded from the Marshall Island, Mollucas and Indonesia, respectively. Neoasterocheres serrulatus occurs in Madagascar and N. scutatus occurs in the Gulf of Aqaba, both in the Indian Ocean. Both Neoasterocheres humesi and N. breviseta n. sp. occur in the Western Atlantic Ocean, the first in the North Atlantic and the latter in the South Atlantic. It is not evident the existence of a biogeographic distributional pattern of the Neoasterocheres n. gen.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CA441B361AFF859DF4FF09FDBFFBA3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Canário, Roberta;Rocha, Carlos Eduardo Falavigna Da;Neves, Elizabeth;Johnsson, Rodrigo	Canário, Roberta, Rocha, Carlos Eduardo Falavigna Da, Neves, Elizabeth, Johnsson, Rodrigo (2017): A new asterocherid genus (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida) associated with Callyspongia Duchassaing & Michelotti and reassessment of six species of Asterocheres Boeck. Zootaxa 4247 (2): 101-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4247.2.1
