identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03CCD97BD7560B15FF6FFEC1FC166DC3.text	03CCD97BD7560B15FF6FFEC1FC166DC3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Chrysis bidentata subsp. prominea Linsenmaier 1959	<div><p>Chrysis bidentata prominea Linsenmaier, 1959</p><p>Chrysis (Chrysis) bidentata ssp. prominea Linsenmaier, 1959: 131 . Holotype ♀; Switzerland: Wallis (NMLU).</p><p>Chrysis (Chrysis) consanguinea prominea: Linsenmaier 1997: 277 (key).</p><p>Type locality. France, Italy, Switzerland: “ Süd-Frankreich, Sizilien, Schweiz (Wallis). Selten. ♀ Type, ♁ Allotype (Wallis 500-900m, VII.) Coll. m., Paratypen Coll. Verhoeff und Coll. m. ” .</p><p>Paratypes, 3♀♀: France Vaucl. Carpentras 30.v.59 Linsenmaier // Paratypen &lt;handwritten in red&gt; Chrysis L. bidentata Luc. prominea Lins. Linsenmaier det. 59 // PARATYPUS &lt;red label&gt; .</p><p>Remarks. Three paratype specimens are prepared and glued on the same plastic label, in Linsenmaier’s typical style (Rosa et al. 2015b). They were given in exchange by Linsenmaier, after examination of Nadig’s collection in 1963, together with other paratypes (see below) and interesting specimens.</p><p>Linsenmaier (1959, 1968, 1987) confused the name Elampus bidentatus Lucas, 1849 (a northern African species belonging to the tribe Elampini) with Chrysis bidentata Linnaeus, 1767 (described from Sweden and belonging to the tribe Chrysidini, Chrysis viridula group), which is a junior synonymous of Chrysis viridula Linnaeus, 1761 (Paukkunen et al. 2014). Chrysis bidentata Lucas, 1849 sensu Linsenmaier (1959, 1968, 1987) is Chrysis consanguinea Mocsáry, 1889 (described from Algeria). Linsenmaier (1997, 1999) recognized his misinterpretation; however, this inaccuracy is still found in recent articles (e.g. Tarbinsky 2002).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7560B15FF6FFEC1FC166DC3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7560B15FF6FFB97FB3869F8.text	03CCD97BD7560B15FF6FFB97FB3869F8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Chrysis chalcites Mocsary 1890	<div><p>Chrysis chalcites Mocsáry, 1890</p><p>(Fig. 1 A–D)</p><p>Chrysis (Gonochrysis) chalcites Mocsáry, 1890: 55 . Holotype ♀; Russia: Sarepta (ETHZ).</p><p>Chrysis chalcites: Dalla Torre 1892: 49 (cat., Russia).</p><p>Spinolia chalcites: du Buysson in André 1893: 249 (cat., descr., key, southern Russia, Sarepta); Bischoff 1913: 25 (cat., southern Russia); Trautmann 1927: 87 (key), 89 (cat., descr., distr., southern Russia); Balthasar 1953: 64 (key, southern Russia); Móczár 1964b: 447 (tax., Sarepta); Nikol’skaya 1978: 71 (key, southern European part of USSR); Rosa et al. 2019: 202 (cat., distr.), 329 (Fig. 99).</p><p>Pseudochrysis (Spinolia) chalcites: Semenov-Tian-Shanskij 1912: 183 (descr., distr., Volgograd Prov.: Sarepta).</p><p>Euchroeus (Spinolia) chalcites: Linsenmaier 1951: 28 (key), 29 (key), 30 (descr., southern Russia), 99 (cat.); Linsenmaier 1959: 69 (descr., distr., key, southern Russia, mis.), 188 (cat.), 201 (Fig. 221).</p><p>Type locality. Russia: “ Russia meridionalis (Sarepta) (Coll. Schulthess-Rechbergi) ”.</p><p>Holotype, ♀: Sarepta // chalcites &lt;handwritten in red&gt; det. Mosc. [!] // 711 // Holotypus Chrysis chalcites Mocsáry 1890 // 27.I.1989 Berra vidit // Schulthess Rechberg Collection .</p><p>Remarks. Although Mocsáry (1890) clearly reported Schulthess-Rechberg’s collection as the type depository, there was uncertainty on the real type depository and identification of this species. In fact, in the catalogue of the Chrysididae of the world (Kimsey &amp; Bohart 1991) the given type depository is HMNH. The Mocsáry collection at HMNH was recently examined by the first author (Rosa et al. 2017b) and the only specimen found under the name Chrysis chalcites is not a type, but a male specimen belonging to an unidentified species, bearing the locality label “ Asia min. Adalia ” (Asia Minor, Adalia [= Antalya]). This specimen is bearing a handwritten label by Kimsey “ Not type: the type is ♀ from “ Russia meridionalis” (Sarepta) ”. The specimen housed at ETHZ is undoubtedly the holotype examined by Mocsáry (1890), as confirmed by the red handwritten identification label and by morphological comparison, which is matching the original description.</p><p>Linsenmaier (1959: pag. 5) examined the type deposited at ETHZ and drew its face in the plates (Fig. 221). Nevertheless, the identification key and the description (pag. 69) are based on another specimen still deposited in his collection, which belongs to another species of Spinolia placed between Spinolia rogenhoferi (Mocsáry, 1889) and Spinolia dournovii (Radoszkovsky, 1866) .</p><p>The type corresponds to the current interpretation of the species given by Rosa et al. (2019).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7560B15FF6FFB97FB3869F8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7570B14FF6FFB5AFB76685B.text	03CCD97BD7570B14FF6FFB5AFB76685B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Chrysis confinis Mocsary 1912	<div><p>Chrysis confinis Mocsáry, 1912</p><p>Chrysis (Tetrachrysis) confinis Mocsáry, 1912: 404 . Lectotype ♀ designated by Bohart (in Bohart &amp; French 1986: 341); South Africa: Limpopo Province: Shilouvane [= Shiluvane] (HMNH).</p><p>Chrysis confinis: Kimsey &amp; Bohart 1991: 399 (cat., maindroni group).</p><p>Type locality. South Africa: “ Transvaal: Shilouvane (Coll. Schulthess-Rechbergi et Mus. Hung.) ”.</p><p>Paralectotype, ♀: Shilouvane N. Transvaal (Junod) // confinis Mocs. typ. &lt;handwritten in red&gt; det. Mocsáry. // TYPUS &lt;red label&gt; // Schulthess Rechberg Collection .</p><p>Remarks. The lectotype was designated by Bohart (in Bohart &amp; French 1986) based on a female specimen deposited at Budapest, in Mocsáry’s collection. The paralectotype housed at ETHZ is conspecific with the lectotype. Chrysis confinis Mocsáry belongs to Chrysis maindroni species group (Madl &amp; Rosa 2012).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7570B14FF6FFB5AFB76685B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7570B13FF6FF932FE7A6EF8.text	03CCD97BD7570B13FF6FF932FE7A6EF8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Chrysis friederichsi von Schulthess 1918	<div><p>Chrysis friederichsi von Schulthess, 1918</p><p>Chrysis (Dichrysis) Friederichsi von Schulthess, 1918: 98 . Syntype ♂; Madagascar: Diego Suarez, Antananarivo (ETHZ, MfN).</p><p>Chrysidea friederichsi: Kimsey &amp; Bohart 1991: 313 (synonymous of Chrysidea bellula (Guérin-Méneville, 1842)) .</p><p>Type locality. Madagascar: “ Diegod, Suarez, Madagaskar borealis Kiesw, Antananarivo 2♁ (Dr. Friederichs captivus Gallorum leg. 1916 (c.m.) ”.</p><p>Syntype, ♂: Antanarivo Madagascar // Chrysis friederichsi &lt;handwritten in red&gt; det. Schulthess 91 6 // Type &lt;printed in red&gt; // Chrysis L. bellula Guér. Linsenmaier det. // Schulthess Rechberg Collection .</p><p>Remarks. The second syntype is housed at MfN, in Trautmann’s collection. Chrysis friederichsi was apparently synonymised with Chrysidea bellula (Guérin-Méneville, 1842) for the first time by Kimsey &amp; Bohart (1991) (Azevedo et al. 2010).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7570B13FF6FF932FE7A6EF8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7500B12FF6FFEA1FBC86998.text	03CCD97BD7500B12FF6FFEA1FBC86998.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Chrysis grohmanni subsp. nadigorum Bischoff in Nadig & Nadig 1935	<div><p>Chrysis grohmanni nadigorum Bischoff in Nadig &amp; Nadig, 1935</p><p>(Figs 2 A–D, 3A–D)</p><p>Chrysis grohmanni var. nadigorum Bischoff in Nadig &amp; Nadig, 1935: 18 . Holotype female [not syntype males]; Morocco: Goundafa (ETHZ).</p><p>Chrysis (Chrysis) nadigorum: Linsenmaier 1959: 108 (key, succincta group), 110 (descr.), 190 (cat.); Linsenmaier 1999: 150 (key), 154 (descr.).</p><p>Chrysis grohmanni var. nadigorum: Kimsey &amp; Bohart 1991: 416 (synonymous of Chrysis grohmanni Dahlbom, 1854).</p><p>Type locality. Morocco: “ Goundafa, 1♀ ”.</p><p>Holotype, ♀: Goundafa, Maroc 14.-15.VII.32 Ad. Nadig // Chr. grohmanni nadigorum Typ. Bis. Det. Bischoff.</p><p>Remarks. The description of Chrysis grohmanni nadigorum was based on a female, to be considered the holotype. Kimsey &amp; Bohart (1991: 416) erroneously reported syntype males deposited in Berlin. Further specimens were eventually searched in Berlin by the first author (PR) without success. Linsenmaier (1968) designated in his collection a male specimen as the allotype. The latter has no type status because it is not part of the type series and it was collected in Morocco at Asni on 25 May 1964 by Linsenmaier himself, after the original description.</p><p>Chrysis nadigorum was upgraded to species rank by Linsenmaier (1959), who later described the genital capsule (Linsenmaier 1968), which is similar to that of Chrysis gribodoi Abeille de Perrin, 1878 (Fig. 2C). It was synonymised with Chrysis grohmanni Dahlbom, 1854 by Kimsey &amp; Bohart (1991), and finally revalidated by Linsenmaier (1999). It is a valid species with a distinct chromatic sexual dimorphism: the male is entirely blue-green (Fig. 2D), whereas the female has red metasomal terga II and III (Figs 2 A–B). Linsenmaier (1968) recorded a chromatic variant of the female, in which the metasoma is entirely red. An assessment of the variability of this species is currently unfeasible because the species is very rarely collected (Linsenmaier 1968) and, as far as we know, only a few Moroccan specimens are deposited in ETHZ, NMLU, and in the private collections of the first author, Gian Luca Agnoli (Bologna, Italy) and Marek Halada (České Budějovice, Czech Republic).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7500B12FF6FFEA1FBC86998	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7520B11FF6FFF09FED96C70.text	03CCD97BD7520B11FF6FFF09FED96C70.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Chrysis leachii subsp. mauritanica Trautmann 1927	<div><p>Chrysis leachii mauritanica Trautmann, 1927</p><p>(Fig. 4 A–D)</p><p>Chrysis leachii var. mauritanica Trautmann, 1927: 133 [not 153]. Syntypes ♁♁ and ♀♀; Tunisia (MfN, ETHZ).</p><p>Chrysis (Chrysis) mauritanica: Linsenmaier 1959: 118 (key), 120 (descr.), 190 (cat., leachii group), 204 (fig. 336), 207 (fig. 467), 208 (fig. 481).</p><p>Chrysis mauritanica: Kimsey &amp; Bohart 1991: 437 (cat., succincta-leachii group).</p><p>Type locality. Tunisia: “ Tunis, Coll. Trautmann, Coll. Schulthess ”.</p><p>Syntypes, 1♂, 1♀: Tunisie Hammamet Santschi VII.16 // Collectio Reichensperger // Chrysis leachii Shuck. var. nov. mauritanica Tr. Cotype! u. Ubergang det. Trautmann &lt;handwritten on red label&gt; // Schulthess Rechberg Collection .</p><p>Remarks. Other syntypes are housed at MfN, in Trautmann’s collection. It was ranked as species by Linsenmaier (1959).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7520B11FF6FFF09FED96C70	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7520B11FF6FFA3FFD4168FB.text	03CCD97BD7520B11FF6FFA3FFD4168FB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Chrysis leptomandibularis Niehuis 2000	<div><p>Chrysis leptomandibularis Niehuis, 2000</p><p>Chrysis leptomandibularis Niehuis, 2000: 192 . Holotype ♀; Germany: Rheinland-Pfalz, Monsheim (SMF) (ignita group).</p><p>Type locality. Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine. Holotype: Germany: Rheinland-Pfalz, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=8.2&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=49.633335" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 8.2/lat 49.633335)">Monsheim</a>, 49°38’ N, 08°12’ E, 28.v.1998, leg. G. Reder (Frankfurt).</p><p>Paratypes, 1♀: Halde Chur 20.VI.22 Dr. Ad. Nadig // ignita ♀ brevidens? Tourn. det. Ad. Nadig // Chrysis L. angustula Sch. Linsenmaier det. 62 // Paratype ♀ Chrysis leptomandibularis n. sp. det. ’98 O. Niehuis &lt;red label&gt;; 1♀, Rüfenacht 21.VI.1927 Steck // Chrysis L. angustula Sch. Linsenmaier det. 62 // Paratype ♀ Chrysis leptomandibularis n. sp. det. ’98 O. Niehuis &lt;red label&gt;.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7520B11FF6FFA3FFD4168FB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7520B10FF6FF8D2FA976FF7.text	03CCD97BD7520B10FF6FF8D2FA976FF7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Chrysis monticola Lins. Linsenmaier 1999	<div><p>Chrysis monticola Linsenmaier, 1999</p><p>Chrysis (Chrysis) monticola Linsenmaier, 1999: 168 . Holotype ♀; Morocco: H. Atlas, Tizi-n-Test, 1900 m (NMLU) (aestiva group).</p><p>Chrysis monticola: Rosa et al. 2015c: 89 (descr., distr.).</p><p>Type locality. Algeria, Morocco: “ Marokko, Algerien.— Marokko: ♀ Type (Holotypus) H. Atlas Tizi-n-Test 1900m, 30.VI.1987 M. Schwarz, Coll. m. , ♁ Allotype M-Atlas Timahdite 1800m, 9.VI.1964 leg. u. Coll. m.; Paratypen H. Atlas Ijoukak 1200m, VII.1932 leg. u. Coll. A. Nadig, Msenrir (NE) 2400m 3.VII.1987 leg. u. Coll. M. Schwarz; Antiatlas Ait Saoun 1400m, 31.V.1990 und Agdz, 30.V.1990 leg. u. Coll. W. Schlaefle u. m.—Algerien: Hoggar, Tamanrasset Guelta (25 km NE) 26.III.1989 leg. K. Warncke, ♁ Paratype Coll. m. ”.</p><p>Paratype, 1♂: Goundafa, Maroc 14.–15.VII.32 Ad. Nadig // spec.? ♂ det. Bischoff // ♂ Paratype &lt;handwritten in red&gt; Chrysis L. monticola Lins. Linsenmaier det. 65.</p><p>Remarks. Linsenmaier (1999) erroneously reported Ijoukak as the type locality for the specimen collected by Nadig in July 1932, which was conversely collected at Goundafa, on the Hight Atlas. This species is spreading in southern Europe and it was recently found in Portugal (Rosa et al. 2015c) and in Spain (P.R., unpublished data).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7520B10FF6FF8D2FA976FF7	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7530B10FF6FFDD8FC4C6D91.text	03CCD97BD7530B10FF6FFDD8FC4C6D91.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Chrysis purpureifrons subsp. helleniensis Linsenmaier 1968	<div><p>Chrysis purpureifrons helleniensis Linsenmaier, 1968</p><p>Chrysis (Chrysogona) purpureifrons ssp. helleniensis Linsenmaier, 1968: 48 . Holotype ♀; Greece: Athen (NMLU) (dichroa group). Chrysura purpureifrons ssp. helleniensis: Kimsey &amp; Bohart 1991: 494 (cat.).</p><p>Type locality. Greece, former Yugoslavia, Southern Russia: “ Griechenland, Jugoslawien, Süd-Russland. ♀ Type von Athen, ♁ Allotype von Korinthos in Coll. m. Paratypen in Coll. de Beaumont, Verhoeff und m. ” .</p><p>Paratypes, 2♀♀: Graecia, Pelop. Sparta 15. V.62 leg. Linsenmaier // Paratype &lt;handwritten in red&gt; Chrysis L. purpureifrons helleniensis Lins. Linsenmaier det. 63 // Paratypus &lt;red label&gt;.</p><p>Remarks. Taxon currently included in Chrysura Dahlbom, 1845 .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7530B10FF6FFDD8FC4C6D91	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7530B1FFF6FFC7FFC7C6CC4.text	03CCD97BD7530B1FFF6FFC7FFC7C6CC4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Chrysis santschii Linsenmaier 1959	<div><p>Chrysis santschii Linsenmaier, 1959</p><p>(Fig. 5 A–5D)</p><p>Chrysis (Chrysis) santschii Linsenmaier, 1959: 120 . Holotype ♀; Tunisia: Hammamet ( leachii group) (ETHZ).</p><p>Chrysis santschii: Kimsey &amp; Bohart 1991: 459 (cat., succincta-leachii group).</p><p>Type locality. Tunisia: “ Tunesien, ♀ Type Ent. Institut Zürich, ♀ Paratypen ebenda und Coll. m. ”.</p><p>Holotype, ♀: Hammamet VII.1916 (Santschi) // Type &lt;handwritten in red&gt; Chrysis L. Chrysogona ♀ Santschii Lins. Linsenmaier det. 55 // Schulthess Rechberg Collection.</p><p>Paratypes, 2 ♀: Kairouan 1.IV.1917 (Santschi) [handwritten] // Paratypen &lt;handwritten in red&gt; Chrysis L. Chrysogona ♀ Santschii Lins. Linsenmaier det. 55 // Schulthess Rechberg Collection ; 3 ♀: Hammamet Tunisia VII.16 Santschi // Paratypen &lt;handwritten in red&gt; Chrysis L. Chrysogona ♀ Santschii Lins. Linsenmaier det. 55 // Schulthess Rechberg Collection.</p><p>Remarks. Linsenmaier (1959) did not report the accurate type locality and collecting date, which are Hammamet, July 1916, for the holotype, for three paratype specimens deposited at ETHZ and four paratypes deposited at NMLU; Kairouan is the other type locality for two female paratypes at ETHZ.</p><p>Linsenmaier (1959) designated a male specimen in his collection as the allotype. This specimen was collected by Santschi at Kairouan in June 1909, but it has no type status because it was not mentioned in the original type series and labelled as allotype in 1963, after the original description.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7530B1FFF6FFC7FFC7C6CC4	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD75C0B1EFF6FFC89FA8C6A13.text	03CCD97BD75C0B1EFF6FFC89FA8C6A13.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Chrysis tingitana Bischoff in Nadig & Nadig 1935	<div><p>Chrysis tingitana Bischoff in Nadig &amp; Nadig, 1935</p><p>(Figs 6A, B, 7 A–D)</p><p>Chrysis tingitana Bischoff in Nadig &amp; Nadig, 1935: 15 . Holotype ♀; Morocco: Asni (ETHZ).</p><p>Chrysis (Chrysis) tingitana: Linsenmaier 1959: 136 (descr., emarginatula group); Linsenmaier 1999: 186 (descr., emarginatula group), 193 (fig. 242).</p><p>Chrysis tingitana: Kimsey &amp; Bohart 1991: 471 (cat., elegans group).</p><p>Type locality. Morocco: “ Asni, 9 ♀, 3 ♁; Goundafa, 1♀ ” (pag. 16), “Ein ♀ und ♁ sind als Typus resp. Allotypus (Asni, in coll. Nadig) bezeichnet, die übrigen Stücke als Paratypen (in coll. Bischoff et Nadig) ”.</p><p>Holotype, ♀: Asni, Maroc 10.–14.VII.32 Ad. Nadig // Chrysis tingitana Bisch ♀ typus det. Bischoff // red label.</p><p>Paratypes, 1♀: Goundafa, Maroc 14.–15.VII.32 Ad. Nadig // Holo-Chrysis tingitana Bisch n.sp. ♀ det. Ad. Nadig; 2♀♀: Asni, Maroc 10.–14.VII.32 Ad. Nadig // Chrysis tingitana Bisch ♀ Paratypus det. Bischoff // red label; 1♂: same collecting data // Chrysis tingitana Bisch ♀ Allotypus det. Bischoff // red label; 1♂: same collecting data // Chrysis tingitana Bisch ♀ Paratypus det. Bischoff // red label.</p><p>Remarks. In the original description, 12 type specimens from Asni and one from Goundafa are mentioned. In the ETHZ collection, there are 10 specimens from Asni and one from Goundafa. We consider only six specimens (two ♂, four ♀) from Asni and 1 ♀ from Goundafa to be types, because they bear an additional red label. Other specimens from Asni without red label are considered doubtful types, since the total number of known specimens is apparently higher than those given in the original description. In fact, in the Zimmermann collection (NHMW) there is another female specimen collected by Nadig at Asni, 10–14.VII.32, labelled Holo-Chrysis tingitana Bisch n.sp. det. Ad. Nadig (Rosa et al. 2020); 2 ♀, 1 ♂ with the same labels are deposited in the Linsenmaier collection at NMLU and others are deposited in Bischoff’s collection at MfN. Very likely, Nadig collected more specimens of Chrysis tingitana at Asni and sent only 13 selected specimens to Bischoff for the description. Kimsey &amp; Bohart (1991) reported the depository of the holotype erroneoulsy at MfN instead of ETHZ.</p><p>Chrysis tingitana was listed for the Italian fauna by Strumia (1995) as a species possibly accidentally introduced. In the following years, it was listed as an introduced species (e.g. Audisio et al. 2009) but we can confirm that the specimen cited by Strumia (1995) was collected in Morocco and later erroneously labelled as collected from a locality in Lazio (Italy), and for this reason it was excluded from the European fauna by Rosa &amp; Soon (2012).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD75C0B1EFF6FFC89FA8C6A13	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD75E0B1DFF6FFF09FEA86B65.text	03CCD97BD75E0B1DFF6FFF09FEA86B65.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Chrysis viridicyanea Linsenmaier 1968	<div><p>Chrysis viridicyanea Linsenmaier, 1968</p><p>Chrysis (Chrysis) viridicyanea Linsenmaier, 1968: 63, nec Giebel, 1862. Holotype ♀; Egypt: Cairo (succincta group) (NMLU). Linsenmaier 1999: 150 (key), 155 (descr., distr.).</p><p>Chrysis viridicyanea: Kimsey &amp; Bohart 1991: 477 (cat., succincta s.s. group).</p><p>Chrysis robertsi Rosa nom. nov. pro Chrysis viridicyanea Linsenmaier, 1959, nec Giebel, 1862.</p><p>Type locality. Egypt, Saudi Arabia: “ Ägypten, Saudi-Arabien, ♀ Type von Kairo, X.57, leg. Pulawski, ♁ Allotype von Saudi-Arabien, El Riyadh, leg. Diehl, in Coll. m., Paratypen in Coll. Nadig und m. ”.</p><p>Paratypes, 1♀: Kairo III-V.35 Mochi (Nadig) // ♀ Type &lt;handwritten in red&gt; Chrysis L. grohmanni viridicyanea Lins. Linsenmaier det. 62 // Holotypus &lt;red label&gt;; 1♂: Kairo III-V.35 Mochi ( Nadig) // ♂ Allotype &lt;handwritten in red&gt; Chrysis L. grohmanni viridicyanea Lins. Linsenmaier det. 62 // Allotypus &lt;red label&gt;; 1♂: Kairo III-V.35 Mochi ( Nadig) // ♂ Paratype &lt;handwritten in red&gt; Chrysis L. grohmanni viridicyanea Lins. Linsenmaier det. 62 // Paratypus &lt;red label&gt;; 1♂: Coll. A. Mochi 30.V.33 Ezbeth el Nakhl Egitto // Chr. friesei d. Alfieri // 4 Ch. [Tetrachrysis] grohmanni cyanea ♂ Trtm. det. Ad. Nadig // Paratype &lt;handwritten in red&gt; Chrysis L. grohmanni viridicyanea Lins . Linsenmaier det. 62 // Paratypus &lt;red label&gt;; 1♀: Coll. A. Mochi 4.VI.33 Ezbeth el Nakhl Egitto // friesei det. Alfieri // 4 Ch. [Tetrachrysis] grohmanni cyanea ♀ Trtm. det. Ad. Nadig // Paratype &lt;handwritten in red&gt; Chrysis L. grohmanni viridicyanea Lins . Linsenmaier det. 62 // Paratypus &lt;red label&gt;; 1♀: Coll. A. Mochi 4.VI.33 Marg Egitto // Chr. quadrispina Buyss. d. Alfieri // 4 Ch. [Tetrachrysis] grohmanni cyanea ♀ Trtm. det. Ad. Nadig // Paratype &lt;handwritten in red&gt; Chrysis L. grohmanni viridicyanea Lins. Linsenmaier det. 62 // Paratype &lt;handwritten in red&gt;.</p><p>Remarks. Linsenmaier in 1962 labelled 1 ♂ and 1 ♀ from Nadig’s collection as holotype and allotype of Chrysis grohmanni viridicyanea . Linsenmaier (1968) later described this taxon as Chrysis viridicyanea and selected as holotype and allotype two specimens from his collection, collected by Pulawski and Diehl, respectively. In the same description, he designated the specimens in Nadig’s collection as paratypes. Only three specimens were labelled as types by Linsenmaier in 1962, whereas three other specimens in the collection are labelled by someone else as paratypes, yet without the handwritten identification labels by Linsenmaier. We consider the latter specimens to be possible paratypes. Kimsey &amp; Bohart (1991) reported the depository of the holotype erroneoulsy at ETHZ instead of NMLU.</p><p>Chrysis viridicyanea Linsenmaier, 1968 is a junior homonym of Chrysis viridicyanea Giebel, 1862 . Both taxa were listed in Kimsey &amp; Bohart (1991: 477) as valid species names, without further information. Chrysis viridicyanea Giebel is a fossil species in African copal, originated from Tanzania, Holocene. We propose the new name Chrysis robertsi Rosa nom. nov. pro Chrysis viridicyanea Linsenmaier, 1959, nec Giebel, 1862. The specific epithet robertsi is dedicated to Huw Roberts (U.A.E.) for his precious help in the study of cuckoo wasps from the United Arab Emirates.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD75E0B1DFF6FFF09FEA86B65	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD75E0B1CFF6FF9DBFE9C6F43.text	03CCD97BD75E0B1CFF6FF9DBFE9C6F43.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ellampus albipennis Mocsary 1889	<div><p>Ellampus albipennis Mocsáry, 1889</p><p>Ellampus (Notozus) albipennis Mocsáry, 1889: 80 . Lectotype ♂ designated by Móczár (1964a: 447); Russia: Astrakhan (paralectotypes from Sarepta) (HMNH).</p><p>Omalus (Notozus) albipennis: Linsenmaier 1959: 24 (cat., descr., distr.), 186 (cat.).</p><p>Notozus albipennis: Móczár 1964a: 447 (descr., lectotype designation).</p><p>Elampus albipennis: Kimsey &amp; Bohart 1991: 166 (cat.).</p><p>Type locality: Russia: “ Patria: Russia meridionalis (Sarepta, Mus. Vindob.!) et orientalis (Astrahan, Coll. Rad.! et Mus. Hung.) ”.</p><p>Paralectotype, ♂: Sarepta // 720 // albipennis &lt;handwritten in red&gt; det. Mocsary // Schulthess Rechberg Collection .</p><p>Remarks. No specimen is mentioned in the original description from the Schulthess’ collection. Nevertheless, the labels and the type locality Sarepta match the original ones found at HMNH and NHMW and the specimen matches the original description. Since in the Schulthess collection there are specimens originated from NHMW and labelled by Kohl, very likely an exchange of specimens has occurred between von Schulthess and the Austrian Museum (as in other cases found in the collection, for example Philoctetes truncatus, collected by Megerle and identified by Kohl).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD75E0B1CFF6FF9DBFE9C6F43	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD75F0B1BFF6FFE0CFD436FD0.text	03CCD97BD75F0B1BFF6FFE0CFD436FD0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ellampus auratus subsp. virescens Mocsary 1889	<div><p>Ellampus auratus virescens Mocsáry, 1889</p><p>(Fig. 8 A–D)</p><p>Ellampus (Ellampus) auratus var. virescens Mocsáry, 1889: 91 . Lectotype ♀ designated by Móczár (1964b: 436); Russia: Sarepta (ETHZ).</p><p>Omalus auratus var. virescens: Móczár 1964b: 436 (synonymous of Omalus auratus (Linnaeus, 1758)) .</p><p>Pseudomalus auratus var. virescens: Kimsey &amp; Bohart 1991: 266 (synonymous of Pseudomalus auratus (Linnaeus, 1758)) .</p><p>Type locality. Hungary, Romania, Russia: “ Russia meridionalis (Sarepta, Coll. Schultess-Rechbergi! et Saussurei!) Romania (Dobrutscha, Mus. Hung.); Hungaria centralis (Mus. Hung.) ”.</p><p>Lectotype, ♀: Sarepta // 858 // auratus virescens &lt;handwritten in red&gt; det. Mocsary // Omalus Pz. auratus L. Linsenmaier det. // Lecto- typus Ell. auratus var. virescens Mocsáry &lt;red label handwritten by Móczár&gt; // Omalus auratus L. det. L. Móczár // Schulthess Rechberg Collection.</p><p>Paralectotype, ♀: Sarepta // auratus virescens &lt;handwritten in red&gt; det. Mocsary // Omalus Pz. pusillus F. Linsenmaier det. // Schulthess Rechberg Collection.</p><p>Remarks. Móczár (1964b: 436) designated the lectotype at ETHZ and paralectotypes at HMNH and MHNG.</p><p>The type series includes specimens belonging to different species: Pseudomalus auratus (Linnaeus, 1758), Pseudomalus pusillus (Fabricius, 1804) and Omalus biaccinctus (du Buysson in André, 1893) . As already stated by Móczár (1964b), the lectotype is a female of Pseudomalus auratus (Linnaeus, 1758) (synonymised by Móczár 1964b, and transferred to Pseudomalus by Kimsey &amp; Bohart 1991). In the catalogue of the Chrysididae of the world, Kimsey &amp; Bohart (1991) listed syntypes housed only at HMNH and MHNG.</p><p>In Schulthess’ collection there are three other specimens bearing the same collecting label “Sarepta”. One female was identified as Ellampus auratus var. maculatus du Buysson by Mocsáry; 1 ♀ was identified as Ellampus auratus by Frey (identification confirmed by Linsenmaier) and finally 1 ♂ was identified as Omalus auratus by Linsenmaier. Although these specimens do not bear any type label or identification label handwritten by Mocsáry, they can be considered possible paralectotypes.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD75F0B1BFF6FFE0CFD436FD0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7580B1AFF6FFDBCFA816FD0.text	03CCD97BD7580B1AFF6FFDBCFA816FD0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ellampus auratus subsp. viridiventris Mocsary 1890	<div><p>Ellampus auratus viridiventris Mocsáry, 1890</p><p>(Fig. 9 A–D)</p><p>Ellampus (Ellampus) auratus var. viridiventris Mocsáry, 1890: 50 . Lectotype ♀ designated by Móczár (1964b: 438); Russia:</p><p>Sarepta (ETHZ). Omalus auratus var. viridiventris: Trautman 1927: 39 (descr., distr., Caucasus). Omalus auratus ab. viridiventris: Móczár 1964b: 438 (cat., descr., key, Caucasus). Pseudomalus auratus viridiventris: Kimsey &amp; Bohart 1991: 266 (cat., synonymous of Pseudomalus auratus (Linnaeus, 1758)). Pseudomalus auratus viridiventris: Vinokurov 2012a: 1873 (cat., ecol., Karachayevo-Cherkess Rep.: Teberda Nature Reserve); Vinokurov 2012b: 40 (cat., ecol., Karachayevo-Cherkess Rep.: Teberda Nature Reserve); Vinokurov 2014a: 284 (cat.Karachayevo-Cherkess Rep.: Teberda Nature Reserve); 2014b: 92 (cat., Adygei Rep.: Maykop); Rosa et al. 2019: 88 (cat., distr.).</p><p>Type locality. Azerbaijan, Georgia, Russia: “ Caucasus (Borschom [= Borzhomi, Georgia], Lenkoran, Daghestan) (Coll.Schultess-Rechberg) ”.</p><p>Lectotype, sex unknown: Kasumkent Daghestan // auratus var. viridiventris &lt;handwritten in red&gt; det. Mocsary // 733 // Omalus Pz. auratus L. Linsenmaier det. // Lecto typus Ell. auratus var. viridiventris Mocsáry &lt;red label handwritten by Móczár&gt; // Schulthess Rechberg Collection.</p><p>Remarks. Móczár (1964b: 438) designated the lectotype at ETHZ and considered viridiventris to be an aberration of Omalus auratus (Linnaeus, 1758): “ Omalus auratus ab. viridiventris stat. nov.”, according to ICZN (Art. 45.6.2.) m. (morph) and ab. (aberration) have no valid status because they are considered infrasubspecific. Vinokurov (2012a, 2012 b, 2014a, 2014b) and Rosa et al. (2019) considered viridiventris to be a subspecies of Pseudomalus auratus . This taxon is largely distributed throughout the Caucasus (Rosa et al. 2019). Kimsey &amp; Bohart (1991) reported syntypes instead of lectotype and transferred viridiventris to the genus Pseudomalus Ashmead, 1902 .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7580B1AFF6FFDBCFA816FD0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7590B1AFF6FFDBCFBE76DF0.text	03CCD97BD7590B1AFF6FFDBCFBE76DF0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ellampus horvathi Mocsary 1889	<div><p>Ellampus horvathi Mocsáry, 1889</p><p>Ellampus Wesmaeli Mocsáry, 1882, nom. praeocc., nec Chevrier 1862.</p><p>Ellampus (Ellampus) Horváthi Mocsáry, 1889: 82, nom. nov. for Ellampus Wesmaeli Mocsáry, 1882 . Lectotype ♀ designated by Móczár (1964b: 434); Serbia: Deliblat (HNHM).</p><p>Omalus (Omalus) horvathi: Linsenmaier 1959: 19 (cat., descr., distr.).</p><p>Omalus horvathi: Móczár 1964b: 434 (lectotype designation).</p><p>Philoctetes horvathi: Kimsey &amp; Bohart 1991: 256 (cat.).</p><p>Type locality. Austria, Hungary, Russia, Serbia: “ Patria: Austria inferior (Coll. Handlirschi!); Hungaria centralis et meridionalis, mense Julio sat rarus (Mocs.); Russia meridionalis (Sarepta, Coll. Schulthess-Rechbergi!) ”.</p><p>Paralectotype, ♀: Sarepta // 862 // Horvathi &lt;handwritten in red&gt; det. Mocsary // Schulthess Rechberg Collection.</p><p>Remarks. Móczár (1964b) designated the lectotype at Budapest (HMNH).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7590B1AFF6FFDBCFBE76DF0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7590B1AFF6FFBDCFEEA681D.text	03CCD97BD7590B1AFF6FFBDCFEEA681D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ellampus sareptanus subsp. inflammatus Mocsary 1890	<div><p>Ellampus sareptanus inflammatus Mocsáry, 1890</p><p>(Fig. 10 A–D)</p><p>Ellampus sareptanus var. inflammatus Mocsáry, 1890: 50 . Holotype ♀; Iran: Astrabad [= Gorgan] (ETHZ).</p><p>Omalus sareptantus var. inflammatus: Trautmann 1927: 35 (cat.), 36 (descr.).</p><p>Omalus (Omalus) horvathi ssp. inflammatus: Linsenmaier 1959: 20 (cat., descr., distr.).</p><p>Philoctetes sareptanus inflammatus: Kimsey &amp; Bohart 1991: 257 (cat.).</p><p>Type locality: “ Patria: Astrabad in Persia (Coll. Schulthess-Rechbergi!) ”.</p><p>Holotype, ♀: Astrabad // sareptanus v. inflammatus &lt;handwritten in red&gt; det. Mocsary // 731 // Omalus Pz. horwathi [!] Mocs. ssp. inflammatus Mocs . Linsenmaier det. 57 // Schulthess Rechberg Collection.</p><p>Remarks. This taxon is closely related to Philoctetes deflexus (Abeille de Perrin, 1878) and should be one of its colour variations. The red colouration is variable in examined specimens (see Farhad et al. 2018 under Ph. deflexus).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7590B1AFF6FFBDCFEEA681D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7590B18FF6FF9F3FBDF6F1C.text	03CCD97BD7590B18FF6FF9F3FBDF6F1C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ellampus schulthessi subsp. schulthessi schulthessi Mocsary 1890	<div><p>Ellampus schulthessi schulthessi Mocsáry, 1890</p><p>(Fig. 11 A–D)</p><p>Ellampus schulthessi Mocsáry, 1890: 50 . Holotype ♀; Russia: Sarepta (ETHZ).</p><p>Ellampus sareptanus var. schulthessi: Bischoff 1913: 9 (cat.).</p><p>Omalus sareptanus var. schulthessi: Trautmann 1927: 36 (cat., descr.).</p><p>Omalus (Omalus) Horwati (!) var. schulthessi: Linsenmaier 1951: 10 (descr.), 95 (cat.).</p><p>Omalus (Omalus) sareptanus var. schulthessi: Linsenmaier 1959: 20 (cat.).</p><p>Philoctetes schulthessi: Kimsey &amp; Bohart 1991: 257 (synonymous of Philoctetes sareptanus (Mocsáry, 1889)) .</p><p>Type locality: Russia: “ Patria: Russia meridionalis (Sarepta), a Clariss. Dom. Schulthess-Rechberg mecum benevole communicatus (Coll. Schulthess-Rechbergi) ”.</p><p>Holotype, ♀: Sarepta // Schulthessi &lt;handwritten in red&gt; det. Mocsary // Omalus Pz. sareptanus Mocs . Linsenmaier det. 57 // Schulthess Rechberg Collection .</p><p>Remarks. Ellampus schulthessi Mocsáry, 1889 was synonymised with Philoctetes sareptanus (Mocsáry, 1889) and transferred to Philoctetes Abeille de Perrin, 1879 by Kimsey &amp; Bohart (1991).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7590B18FF6FF9F3FBDF6F1C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD75B0B07FF6FFEF0FA6D6F40.text	03CCD97BD75B0B07FF6FFEF0FA6D6F40.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ellampus schulthessi subsp. subauratus Mocsary 1890	<div><p>Ellampus schulthessi subauratus Mocsáry, 1890</p><p>(Fig. 12 A–D)</p><p>Ellampus schulthessi var. subauratus Mocsáry, 1890: 51 . Holotype ♂; Russia: Raddefka [= Evreyskaya autonomous Prov.: Radde] (ETHZ).</p><p>Ellampus sareptanus var. subauratus: Bischoff 1913: 9 (cat.).</p><p>Omalus sareptanus var. subauratus: Trautmann 1927: 36 (cat., descr.).</p><p>Omalus Horvathi [!] var. subaurata: Linsenmaier 1951: 96 (cat.).</p><p>Omalus (Omalus) sareptanus var. subauratus: Linsenmaier 1959: 20 (cat.).</p><p>Philoctetes schulthessi subauratus: Kimsey &amp; Bohart 1991: 257 (synonymous of Philoctetes sareptanus (Mocsáry, 1889)) .</p><p>Type locality: Russia: “ Patria: Raddefka in territorio Amurensi Sibiriae (Coll. Schulthess-Rechbergi) ”.</p><p>Holotype, ♂: Raddefka // Schulthessi v. subauratus &lt;handwritten in red&gt; det. Mocsary // Omalus Pz. sareptanus Mocs . Linsenmaier det. 57.</p><p>Remarks. Ellampus subauratus was described as a subspecies of Ellampus schulthessi Mocsáry, 1890 and synonymised with Ellampus sareptanus Mocsáry, 1889 (currently Philoctetes sareptanus) by Kimsey &amp; Bohart (1991). However, it is separated from the latter by different punctation on the last metasomal tergum, which is very fine and dense in Ph. sareptanus, but sparse and shallow in Ph. subauratus . For this reason, we consider Philoctetes subauratus (Mocsáry, 1890) spec. resurr. to be a separate species.</p><p>After type examination of both types, we can state that Philoctetes conifer (Semenov-Tian-Shanskij, 1932) is conspecific with Ph. subauratus . Semenov-Tian-Shanskij (1932) followed Bischoff’s (1913) classification of the species and wrote that he did not know Ph. sareptanus (“ mihi in natura ignotae specie ”) and consequently considered Ph. schulthessi and Ph. subauratus varieties of Ph. sareptanus . Here, we propose the synonymy Ellampus schulthessi subauratus Mocsáry, 1890 = Ellampus (Dictenulus) conifer Semenov-Tian-Shanskij, 1932, syn. nov.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD75B0B07FF6FFEF0FA6D6F40	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7440B07FF6FFE0CFEC96D0B.text	03CCD97BD7440B07FF6FFE0CFEC96D0B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hedychridium elegantulum subsp. peloponnense Linsenmaier 1968	<div><p>Hedychridium elegantulum peloponnense Linsenmaier, 1968</p><p>Hedychridium (Hedychridium) elegantulum ssp. peloponnense Linsenmaier, 1968: 31 . Holotype ♀; Greece: Olympia (NMLU).</p><p>Type locality. Greece, Italy: “ Griechenland, Italien, Nieder-Österreich, ♀ Type, ♁ Allotype von Olympia, Paratypen diverser griechisceher Fundorte in Coll. m., ♀ Paratype von Italien ( Marina Pisa) in Coll. Nadig, ♀ Paratype von Burgenland in Coll. Schmidt ”.</p><p>Paratype, 1♀: Marina Pisa VII.1920 // H-dium [= Hedychridium] elongatulum [!] Buyss. det. Ad. Nadig // ♀ Paratype &lt;handwritten in red&gt; Hedychridium Ab. elegantulum peloponnense Lins. Linsenmaier det. 62 // Paratypus &lt;red label&gt;.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7440B07FF6FFE0CFEC96D0B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7440B07FF6FFCC5FD1B6AB4.text	03CCD97BD7440B07FF6FFCC5FD1B6AB4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hedychridium irregulare subsp. insulare Lins. Linsenmaier 1959	<div><p>Hedychridium irregulare insulare Linsenmaier, 1959</p><p>Hedychridium irregulare ssp. insulare Linsenmaier, 1959: 62 . Holotype ♂, Cyprus: Limassol (NMLU).</p><p>Type locality: Cyprus: “ Cypern, Rhodos. ♁ Type ( Cypern, Limassol, V.1949, leg. Mavromoustakis) und ♁♁ Paratypen Coll. m. ”.</p><p>Paratype, ♂: Cypern Limassol Mavromoustakis 14.5.49 // Paratype &lt;handwritten in red&gt; Hedychridium Ab. irregulare ssp. insulare Lins. Linsenmaier det. 57 // Schulthess Rechberg Collection.</p><p>Remarks. Hedychridium irregolare insulare Linsenmaier, 1959 is both homonymous and synonymous of Hedychridium insulare Balthasar, 1954 (Arens 2010) .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7440B07FF6FFCC5FD1B6AB4	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7440B07FF6FFA98FC9A69DD.text	03CCD97BD7440B07FF6FFA98FC9A69DD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hedychrum cyaneum Mocsary in Radoszkowski 1889	<div><p>Hedychrum cyaneum Mocsáry in Radoszkowski, 1889</p><p>Hedychrum cyaneum Mocsáry in Radoszkowski, 1889: 10, nom. praeocc. nec Brullé, 1846. Syntypes ♂ ♀; Russia: Eastern Siberia (ISEA-PAS).</p><p>Hedychrum simile Mocsáry, 1889: 158 . Replacement name for Hedychrum cyaneum Mocsáry in Radoszkowski 1889 nec Brullé, 1846.</p><p>Type locality: Russia: “ Sibérie orientale ”.</p><p>Possible syntype, ♂: Raddefka [= Evreyskaya automomous Prov.: Radde] // 716 // simile &lt;handwritten in red&gt; det. Mocs. [!] // Schulthess Rechberg Collection .</p><p>Remarks. This male is labelled as type, it was collected in the Russian Far East (thus matching the original type locality), and it is morphologically similar to the male syntype housed in Radoszkowski’s collection at ISEA-PAS. For these reasons, it is considered a syntype.</p><p>Mocsáry (in Radoszkowski 1889) described Hedychrum cyaneum (later replaced with the name He. simile) based on a type series [♂ ♀]. In the original description only the type locality Sibérie orientale [= East Siberia or Far East] is mentioned. Currently only one male from Siberia is housed in Radoszkowski’s collection at ISEA-PAS (Rosa et al. 2015d). After the original description, Mocsáry (1889: 158), under the replacement name He. simile, extended the type locality: “Siberia orientalis (Coll. Rad.! et Mus. Hung.) and China borealis (Ta-tschian-sy, Mus. Hung.)”. French (in Bohart &amp; French 1986) designated the female specimen from China listed by Mocsáry (1889) as the lectotype, even if it was not mentioned in the original description (Radoszkowski 1889). For this reason, the lectotype designation was considered invalid (Rosa et al. 2017b).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7440B07FF6FFA98FC9A69DD	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7450B06FF6FFBD3FD0C6BC4.text	03CCD97BD7450B06FF6FFBD3FD0C6BC4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cleptes fallax Mocsary 1889	<div><p>Cleptes fallax Mocsáry, 1889</p><p>Cleptes fallax Mocsáry, 1889: 49 . Lectotype ♂ designated by Móczár (1962: 119); Hungary: Budapest (HNHM).</p><p>Cleptes (Leiocleptes) fallax: Móczár 1962: 119 (lectotype designation, synonymised with Cleptes nitidulus (Fabricius, 1793)) .</p><p>Type locality: Austria, Switzerland: “ Patria: Helvetia (Frey-Gessner); Austria ad Vindobonam [= Vienna] (Coll. Schultess-Rechbergi); Hungaria centralis, in unico solum specimen inventus (Mus. Hung.) ”.</p><p>Paralectotype, ♂: 2285 // 852 // Fallax &lt;handwritten in red&gt; det. Mocsary // Schulthess Rechberg Collection.</p><p>Remarks. Móczár (1962) designated the lectotype, which is deposited at Budapest (HMNH). Rosa et al. (2017b) erroneously considered the lectotype invalid for an incorrect interpretation of the original type locality. Móczár’s (1962) lectotype designation was validly designated.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7450B06FF6FFBD3FD0C6BC4	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7450B06FF6FFD36FB376DFD.text	03CCD97BD7450B06FF6FFD36FB376DFD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cleptes ignitus subsp. scutellaris Mocsary 1889	<div><p>Cleptes ignitus scutellaris Mocsáry, 1889</p><p>Cleptes ignitus var. scutellaris Mocsáry, 1889: 53 . Lectotype ♀ designated by Móczár (1962: 121); Slovakia: Nyitra (HNHM). Cleptes (Zimmermannia) scutellaris: Móczár 1962: 121 (descr., lectotype designation).</p><p>Type locality: Austria, Hungary [= Slovakia]: “ Patria: Hungaria septentrionali-occidentalis (Mus. Hung.); Austria ad Vindobonam [= Vienna] (Coll. Schultess-Rechbergi! Et Mus. Vindob.) ”.</p><p>Paralectotype, ♂: 2285 // 851 // ignitus scutellaris &lt;handwritten in red&gt; det. Mocsary // Schulthess Rechberg Collection.</p><p>Remarks. Móczár (1962) designated the lectotype, which is deposited at Budapest (HMNH).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7450B06FF6FFD36FB376DFD	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7450B05FF6FF9C1FDEC6F64.text	03CCD97BD7450B05FF6FF9C1FDEC6F64.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ellampus marginellus Mocsary 1890	<div><p>Ellampus marginellus Mocsáry, 1890</p><p>Ellampus (Holophris) marginellus Mocsáry, 1890: 51 . Holotype ♀: Sumatra (ETHZ).</p><p>Ellampus marginellus: Dalla Torre 1892: 13 (cat.).</p><p>Holophris marginellus: Ashmead 1902: 229 (cat.); Bischoff 1913: 11 (cat.); Kimsey &amp; Bohart 1991: 225 (cat.).</p><p>Ellampus (Holophris) marginellus: Mocsáry 1913: 287 (cat.).</p><p>Omalus (Holophris) marginellus: Linsenmaier 1959: 20 (cat.).</p><p>Omalus marginellus: Baltazar 1966: 188 (cat.).</p><p>Holophris marginella: Rosa et al. 2016: 205 (cat., distr.), 206 (descr., fig. 4).</p><p>Remarks. Despite intensive research in the ETHZ collection, we could not locate the type of Ellampus marginellus (currently Holophris marginella). The type was already insuccessfully searched by the former curator of the ETHZ collection, Rod Eastwood, for the revision of the Oriental Holophris Mocsáry, 1890 (Rosa et al. 2016). In fact, Ellampus (Holophris) marginellus Mocsáry, 1890 is the type species of the subgenus Holophris . This subgenus was upgraded to genus rank by du Buysson (1900) and it is still accepted as a valid genus (Kimsey &amp; Bohart 1991; Rosa et al. 2016). Ashmead (1902) was the first author to provide a modern key to genera of Chrysididae, including Holophris, whereas Bischoff (1913) was the first author to produce a checklist of the species distributed from South America to Africa and Australia.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7450B05FF6FF9C1FDEC6F64	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7450B06FF6FFF09FB946C0F.text	03CCD97BD7450B06FF6FFF09FB946C0F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Omalus pusillus subsp. bulgariensis Linsenmaier 1959	<div><p>Omalus pusillus bulgariensis Linsenmaier, 1959</p><p>Omalus (Omalus) pusillus ssp. bulgariensis Linsenmaier, 1959: 19 . Holotype ♂; Bulgaria: Bilo (ETHZ).</p><p>Pseudomalus pusillus ssp. bulgariensis: Kimsey &amp; Bohart 1991: 269 (cat.).</p><p>Type locality: Bulgaria: “ Bulgarien, ( Bilo) ♂ Type und Paratypen Coll. Schulthess (Zürich), Paratypen Coll. m. ”.</p><p>Holotype, ♂: Bilo Bulgar. // Ell. pusillus det. Mocsáry // Type &lt;handwritten in red&gt; Omalus Pz. ♁ pusillus F. ssp. bulgariensis Lins. Linsenmaier det. 57.</p><p>Paratypes, 1♂: Bilo Bulgar. // Ell. pusillus det. Mocsary // Paratype &lt;handwritten in red&gt; Omalus Pz. pusillus F. ssp. bulgariensis Lins. Linsenmaier det. 57; 1♂: Aetoz Bulgarien // Paratype &lt;handwritten in red&gt; Omalus Pz. pusillus F. ssp. bulgariensis Lins. Linsenmaier det. 57 // Schulthess Rechberg Collection.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7450B06FF6FFF09FB946C0F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7460B05FF6FFC53FD816B27.text	03CCD97BD7460B05FF6FFC53FD816B27.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Chrysis fulvicornis subsp. graeciana Linsenmaier 1968	<div><p>Chrysis fulvicornis graeciana Linsenmaier, 1968</p><p>Chrysis (Cornuchrysis) fulvicornis ssp. graeciana Linsenmaier, 1968: 111 . Holotype ♀; Greece: Lidoriki (NMLU).</p><p>Original type locality: “ Griechenland (auch Peloponnes), Rhodos. ♀ Type, ♂ Allotype von Lidorikion (Griechenland) in Coll. m., Paratypen im Museum Lausanne, in Coll. Verhoeff und Coll. m. ”.</p><p>Specimen, ♂: Zakaki [Cyprus] VII.34 [leg. Mavromoustakis] // Paratype &lt;handwritten in red&gt; Chrysis L. graeciana Lins. ♂ Linsenmaier det. 62.</p><p>Remarks. The specimens labelled as paratype in the collection has no type status, because the locality Cyprus is not reported in the original description.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7460B05FF6FFC53FD816B27	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7460B05FF6FFE60FD0A6D7D.text	03CCD97BD7460B05FF6FFE60FD0A6D7D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Chrysis propinquata Lins. Linsenmaier 1968	<div><p>Chrysis propinquata Linsenmaier, 1968</p><p>Chrysis (Chrysis) propinquata Linsenmaier, 1968: 62 . Holotype ♀; Egypt: Luzon (NMLU).</p><p>Type locality: “ Ägypten, Palästina. ♀ Type, ♂ Allotype und Paratypen von Luxor, 11.58, leg. Pulawski, Paratypen von Palästina, in Coll. m. ”.</p><p>Specimen, ♀: Coll. A. Mochi 13.V.34 Fayum Egitto // bihamata // ♀ Allotype &lt;handwritten in red&gt; Chrysis L. propinquata Lins . Linsenmaier det. 62 // Allotype &lt;red red&gt;.</p><p>Remarks. Linsenmaier in 1962 wrote allotype on the identification label of this specimen housed in ETHZ. However, he later designated another specimen as allotype in his collection (Linsenmaier 1968) and did not mention the specimen studied in Nadig’s collection anymore.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7460B05FF6FFE60FD0A6D7D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7460B05FF6FFAE9FDA269DA.text	03CCD97BD7460B05FF6FFAE9FDA269DA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ellampus schmiedeknechti Mocsary 1889	<div><p>Ellampus schmiedeknechti Mocsáry, 1889</p><p>Ellampus (Ellampus) Schmiedeknechti Mocsáry, 1889: 83 . Lectotype ♂ designated by Móczár (1964b: 436). Germany: Gumperda (MfN).</p><p>Ellampus pusillus var. Schmiedeknechti: du Buysson in André 1892: 126.</p><p>Omalus pusillus var. Schmiedeknechti: Trautmann 1927: 37 (cat.).</p><p>Omalus pusillus ab. schmiedeknechti: Móczár 1964b: 436 (cat., typ., aberration of Omalus pusillus).</p><p>Type locality: “ Patria: Germania (Thuringia: Bibra penes Gumperda, mense Julio, Coll. Schmiedeknechti et Weissenfels, ab amico Friese inventus mihique donato, Mus. Hung.) ”.</p><p>Specimen, ♀: Lenkoran // Schmiedekn. &lt;handwritten in red&gt; det. Mocsary // 739 // Omalus Pz. pusillus F. Linsenmaier det. 57.</p><p>Remarks. Although the identification label and the printed number match the other identification labels pinned with other type specimens examined by Mocsáry, the locality Lenkoran (Azerbaijan) was not reported in the original description and for this reason this specimen is not considered type. It was considered variation or aberration of Pseudomalus pusillus (du Buysson in André 1892; Trautmann 1927; Linsenmaier 1951; Móczár 1964b). It was synonymised by Móczár (1964b) with Pseudomalus pusillus (Fabricius, 1804) and transferred to Pseudomalus Ashmead by Kimsey &amp; Bohart (1991).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7460B05FF6FFAE9FDA269DA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7470B04FF6FFF09FAEC6C32.text	03CCD97BD7470B04FF6FFF09FAEC6C32.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ellampus violaceus subsp. virens Mocsary 1889	<div><p>Ellampus violaceus virens Mocsáry, 1889</p><p>Ellampus (Ellampus) violaceus var. virens Mocsáry, 1889: 107 . Lectotype ♂ designated by Móczár (1964b: 435); Germany: Blankenburg, Thuringia (HMNH).</p><p>Type locality: “ Patria: Germania (Thuringia, Coll. Schmiedeknechti!); Caucasus (Mus. Vindob.!) ”.</p><p>Specimens, 1 ♂: Siders // violaceus var. virens &lt;handwritten in red&gt; det. Mocsary // 787 // Omalus Pz. violaceus Sc. Linsenmaier det.</p><p>Remarks. As in the previous species, the specimen bears the same identification label and printed number observed with other specimens examined by Mocsáry. However, the locality Siders was not reported in the original description and for this reason this specimen is not considered type. It was synonymised by Linsenmaier (1951) with Pseudomalus violaceus (Scopoli, 1763) and transferred to Pseudomalus by Kimsey &amp; Bohart (1991).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7470B04FF6FFF09FAEC6C32	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7470B04FF6FFD1AFDAA6AAA.text	03CCD97BD7470B04FF6FFD1AFDAA6AAA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hedychridium lampadum subsp. limassolense Linsenmaier 1959	<div><p>Hedychridium lampadum limassolense Linsenmaier, 1959</p><p>Hedychridium roseum var. cypriacum Balthasar, 1954: 54 . Holotype ♀; Cyprus (NHMP).</p><p>Hedychridium lampadum ssp. limassolense Linsenmaier, 1959: 59 . Unnecessary replacement name for Hedychridium roseum var. cypriacum Balthasar, 1954 .</p><p>Type locality: “ Cypern ”.</p><p>Specimen, ♀: Cypern Limassol Mavromoustakis 14.5.49 // Hedychridium Ab. lampadum ssp. limassolensis Lins. Linsenmaier det. 57 // Paratype &lt;handwritten in red&gt; .</p><p>Remarks. Linsenmaier (1959) labelled this specimen as type, as well as all the specimens of Hedychridium lampadum limassolense in his collection. However, they have no type status because this name was given by Linsenmaier (1959) as a new replacement name (nom. nov.) for Hedychridium roseum var. cypriacum Balthasar, 1953 . The name limassolense is an unnecessary replacement name because H. roseum cypriacum was validly described and it is not homonymous. The only types of this taxon are those described by Balthasar (1953), which are deposited in his collection in Prague. Hedychridium roseum var. cypriacum was synonymised with Hedychridium insulare Balthasar, 1953 by Arens (2010: 407).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7470B04FF6FFD1AFDAA6AAA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
03CCD97BD7470B04FF6FFB62FB686857.text	03CCD97BD7470B04FF6FFB62FB686857.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hedychrum frivaldszkyi Mocsary 1889	<div><p>Hedychrum frivaldszkyi Mocsáry, 1889</p><p>Hedychrum Frivaldszkyi Mocsáry, 1889: 164 . Holotype ♂; Turkmenistan: Krasnowodsk [= Türkmenbaşy] (HMNH).</p><p>Original type locality: “ Patria: territorium Maris Caspii ( Krasnowodsk, a Clariss. Dom. Ferdinando Morawitz mihi donatum, Mus. Hung.) ”.</p><p>Specimen, ♂: Astrabad // Frivaldszkyi &lt;handwritten in red&gt; det. Mocsary // 717.</p><p>Remarks. As for the previous species, the specimen bears the same identification label and printed number observed with other specimens examined by Mocsáry. However, the locality Astrabad (Turkmenistan) was not reported in the original description and for this reason this specimen is not considered type.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCD97BD7470B04FF6FFB62FB686857	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rosa, Paolo;Greeff, Michael	Rosa, Paolo, Greeff, Michael (2021): Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich. Zootaxa 4908 (2): 181-204, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2
