taxonID	type	description	language	source
03C2E252FFEC6F5BBEF1AD03FE17B24E.taxon	description	To simulate the presence of an intruder, the experiment consisted of two treatments for each resident male: (1) Self Image, a mirror (14 × 8 cm) supported by a retractable handle 1 m long, positioned in the visual field of the resident male; and (2) Control, with the mirror completely covered with a black rectangle (14 × 8 cm). The mirror was 25 – 30 cm from the actively calling resident male, at an angle of approximately 45 ° in relation to the male ’ s body position to avoid a possible blind spot at 0 ° (directly in front of the animal, Fite 1973). The reflection of the animal in the mirror simulated the presence of an intruder male (Lindquist and Hetherington 1998; Haddad and Giaretta 1999; Furtado and Nomura 2014; Figure 2). Each individual was subjected to each treatment. Each treatment lasted 3 minutes, with 2 - minute intervals between treatments. The order of treatments was previously randomized for each focal animal. The visual responses were classified according to motor patterns described by Hödl and Amézquita (2001) and Hartmann et al. (2005). We described the behavioural limellum during agonistic interactions. repertoires of males of H. raniceps, D. nanus and L. limellum during agonistic interactions (Table 1) and we calculated the mean emission rate per minute per behaviour in each treatment. For the vocal-sac display we calculated the proportion between display time and total treatment time.	en	Furtado, Raíssa, Márquez, Rafael, Hartz, Sandra Maria (2016): In front of a mirror: visual displays may not be aggressive signals in nocturnal tree frogs. Journal of Natural History 51 (7 - 8): 443-454, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2016.1262078, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2016.1262078
