identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03C2E252FFEC6F5BBEF1AD03FE17B24E.text	03C2E252FFEC6F5BBEF1AD03FE17B24E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Data Walker 1862	<div><p>Data collection</p> <p>We observed males of H. raniceps (36 minutes of recordings; six males), D. nanus (36 minutes of recordings; six males) and L. limellum (30 minutes of recordings; five males) in natural conditions, using focal animal sampling (Lehner 1996). Observations began at 20:00, generally 2 hours after the first males started to call. Individuals were selected arbitrarily, mainly those that were in a suitable position either on the ground or on vegetation and at least 3 m distant from other males, and were located with a common flashlight. After the focal animal was selected, all flashlights were turned off to reduce the stress on the animal, and images were captured using a video camera (Panasonic HC-W850) with infrared light, positioned at least 1 m from the focal animal. Visual displays emitted by focal individuals of each species are represented by short videos available in the Supplementary Online Material.</p> <p>To simulate the presence of an intruder, the experiment consisted of two treatments for each resident male: (1) Self Image, a mirror (14 × 8 cm) supported by a retractable handle 1 m long, positioned in the visual field of the resident male; and (2) Control, with the mirror completely covered with a black rectangle (14 × 8 cm). The mirror was 25 – 30 cm from the actively calling resident male, at an angle of approximately 45° in relation to the male ’ s body position to avoid a possible blind spot at 0° (directly in front of the animal, Fite 1973). The reflection of the animal in the mirror simulated the presence of an intruder male (Lindquist and Hetherington 1998; Haddad and Giaretta 1999; Furtado and Nomura 2014; Figure 2). Each individual was subjected to each treatment. Each treatment lasted 3 minutes, with 2-minute intervals between treatments. The order of treatments was previously randomized for each focal animal.</p> <p>The visual responses were classified according to motor patterns described by Hödl and Amézquita (2001) and Hartmann et al. (2005). We described the behavioural limellum during agonistic interactions.</p> <p>repertoires of males of H. raniceps, D. nanus and L. limellum during agonistic interactions (Table 1) and we calculated the mean emission rate per minute per behaviour in each treatment. For the vocal-sac display we calculated the proportion between display time and total treatment time.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C2E252FFEC6F5BBEF1AD03FE17B24E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Furtado, Raíssa;Márquez, Rafael;Hartz, Sandra Maria	Furtado, Raíssa, Márquez, Rafael, Hartz, Sandra Maria (2016): In front of a mirror: visual displays may not be aggressive signals in nocturnal tree frogs. Journal of Natural History 51 (7 - 8): 443-454, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2016.1262078, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2016.1262078
03C2E252FFED6F58BEF1A843FBE6B577.text	03C2E252FFED6F58BEF1A843FBE6B577.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Data Walker 1862	<div><p>Data analysis</p> <p>To test our hypothesis that the repetition rate of each visual display (response variable) would differ between treatments (predictor variable with two levels: Self Image and Control), we used repeated-measures analyses of variance (Sokal and Rohlf 1995) with interaction between treatments and the species sampled. As we were interested in how each behavioural response changed between the treatments, each response variable was tested separately (Huberty and Morris 1989). Statistical tests were performed and graphs were generated in the software R, version 3.2.0 (R Development Core Team 2015).</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C2E252FFED6F58BEF1A843FBE6B577	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Furtado, Raíssa;Márquez, Rafael;Hartz, Sandra Maria	Furtado, Raíssa, Márquez, Rafael, Hartz, Sandra Maria (2016): In front of a mirror: visual displays may not be aggressive signals in nocturnal tree frogs. Journal of Natural History 51 (7 - 8): 443-454, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2016.1262078, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2016.1262078
