taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03C287AAFFFD0B05FF357869FE4EFE80.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581742/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581742	Figures 1–7. Figs 1, 2. Actinocyclus cuneiformis, LM, arrows showing rimoportulae. Figs 3, 4. Amphora spectabilis: Fig. 3. LM at two focal planes showing different striae densities on dorsal and ventral surfaces. Fig. 4. Palau specimen in SEM showing character of striae. Figs. 5–7. Amphora subhyalina. Fig. 5 LM, showing the hyaline character. Fig. 6. SEM detail of valves with conopea at central raphe endings (arrow), also showing striae on dorsal (double arrowhead) and ventral (single arrowhead) part of girdle band. Fig. 7. Frustule showing broad dorsal part of some girdle bands. Scale bars: Figs 1–5, 7 = 10 µm, Fig. 6 = 5 µm. Unless indicated otherwise, all light microscopy (LM) was with differential interference contrast (DIC).	Figures 1–7. Figs 1, 2. Actinocyclus cuneiformis, LM, arrows showing rimoportulae. Figs 3, 4. Amphora spectabilis: Fig. 3. LM at two focal planes showing different striae densities on dorsal and ventral surfaces. Fig. 4. Palau specimen in SEM showing character of striae. Figs. 5–7. Amphora subhyalina. Fig. 5 LM, showing the hyaline character. Fig. 6. SEM detail of valves with conopea at central raphe endings (arrow), also showing striae on dorsal (double arrowhead) and ventral (single arrowhead) part of girdle band. Fig. 7. Frustule showing broad dorsal part of some girdle bands. Scale bars: Figs 1–5, 7 = 10 µm, Fig. 6 = 5 µm. Unless indicated otherwise, all light microscopy (LM) was with differential interference contrast (DIC).	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFFD0B05FF357869FE4EFE80.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581752/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581752	Figures 26–31. Biddulphiella and Biremis. Figs. 23–26. Biddulphiella tridens. Fig. 26. Frustule in valve view at two focal planes. Figs 27, 28. Valves in girdle and valve view, respectively, SEM. Fig. 29. Valve in oblique view, emphasizing the deep grooves (sulci) between the elevations. Figs. 30, 31. Biremis ambigua frustules in SEM. Fig. 30. Oblique view showing raphe and paired external alveolus openings. Fig. 31. Broken frustule showing internal side of alveoli (arrow) and exterior of girdle bands. Scale bars = 10 µm.	Figures 26–31. Biddulphiella and Biremis. Figs. 23–26. Biddulphiella tridens. Fig. 26. Frustule in valve view at two focal planes. Figs 27, 28. Valves in girdle and valve view, respectively, SEM. Fig. 29. Valve in oblique view, emphasizing the deep grooves (sulci) between the elevations. Figs. 30, 31. Biremis ambigua frustules in SEM. Fig. 30. Oblique view showing raphe and paired external alveolus openings. Fig. 31. Broken frustule showing internal side of alveoli (arrow) and exterior of girdle bands. Scale bars = 10 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFFD0B05FF357869FE4EFE80.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581754/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581754	Figures 32–38. Biremis and Campylodiscus. Figs. 32–37. Biremis ridicula. Fig. 32. Frustule in “ventral” girdle view, LM. Fig. 33. Valve and girdle bands in girdle view at two focal planes, LM. Fig. 34. Valve, interior view, SEM. Fig. 35. Frustule in “ventral” girdle view. Fig. 36. Valve in valve view showing asymmetry. Fig. 37. Detail of Fig. 34 showing alveoli and asymmetry. Fig. 38. Campylodiscus robertsianus valve in LM. Scale bars: Fig. 38 = 25 µm, Figs 32–36 = 10 µm, Fig. 37 = 5 µm.	Figures 32–38. Biremis and Campylodiscus. Figs. 32–37. Biremis ridicula. Fig. 32. Frustule in “ventral” girdle view, LM. Fig. 33. Valve and girdle bands in girdle view at two focal planes, LM. Fig. 34. Valve, interior view, SEM. Fig. 35. Frustule in “ventral” girdle view. Fig. 36. Valve in valve view showing asymmetry. Fig. 37. Detail of Fig. 34 showing alveoli and asymmetry. Fig. 38. Campylodiscus robertsianus valve in LM. Scale bars: Fig. 38 = 25 µm, Figs 32–36 = 10 µm, Fig. 37 = 5 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFFE0B05FF357C5DFD38FD23.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581742/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581742	Figures 1–7. Figs 1, 2. Actinocyclus cuneiformis, LM, arrows showing rimoportulae. Figs 3, 4. Amphora spectabilis: Fig. 3. LM at two focal planes showing different striae densities on dorsal and ventral surfaces. Fig. 4. Palau specimen in SEM showing character of striae. Figs. 5–7. Amphora subhyalina. Fig. 5 LM, showing the hyaline character. Fig. 6. SEM detail of valves with conopea at central raphe endings (arrow), also showing striae on dorsal (double arrowhead) and ventral (single arrowhead) part of girdle band. Fig. 7. Frustule showing broad dorsal part of some girdle bands. Scale bars: Figs 1–5, 7 = 10 µm, Fig. 6 = 5 µm. Unless indicated otherwise, all light microscopy (LM) was with differential interference contrast (DIC).	Figures 1–7. Figs 1, 2. Actinocyclus cuneiformis, LM, arrows showing rimoportulae. Figs 3, 4. Amphora spectabilis: Fig. 3. LM at two focal planes showing different striae densities on dorsal and ventral surfaces. Fig. 4. Palau specimen in SEM showing character of striae. Figs. 5–7. Amphora subhyalina. Fig. 5 LM, showing the hyaline character. Fig. 6. SEM detail of valves with conopea at central raphe endings (arrow), also showing striae on dorsal (double arrowhead) and ventral (single arrowhead) part of girdle band. Fig. 7. Frustule showing broad dorsal part of some girdle bands. Scale bars: Figs 1–5, 7 = 10 µm, Fig. 6 = 5 µm. Unless indicated otherwise, all light microscopy (LM) was with differential interference contrast (DIC).	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFFE0B04FF357E09FAE1FE7D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581742/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581742	Figures 1–7. Figs 1, 2. Actinocyclus cuneiformis, LM, arrows showing rimoportulae. Figs 3, 4. Amphora spectabilis: Fig. 3. LM at two focal planes showing different striae densities on dorsal and ventral surfaces. Fig. 4. Palau specimen in SEM showing character of striae. Figs. 5–7. Amphora subhyalina. Fig. 5 LM, showing the hyaline character. Fig. 6. SEM detail of valves with conopea at central raphe endings (arrow), also showing striae on dorsal (double arrowhead) and ventral (single arrowhead) part of girdle band. Fig. 7. Frustule showing broad dorsal part of some girdle bands. Scale bars: Figs 1–5, 7 = 10 µm, Fig. 6 = 5 µm. Unless indicated otherwise, all light microscopy (LM) was with differential interference contrast (DIC).	Figures 1–7. Figs 1, 2. Actinocyclus cuneiformis, LM, arrows showing rimoportulae. Figs 3, 4. Amphora spectabilis: Fig. 3. LM at two focal planes showing different striae densities on dorsal and ventral surfaces. Fig. 4. Palau specimen in SEM showing character of striae. Figs. 5–7. Amphora subhyalina. Fig. 5 LM, showing the hyaline character. Fig. 6. SEM detail of valves with conopea at central raphe endings (arrow), also showing striae on dorsal (double arrowhead) and ventral (single arrowhead) part of girdle band. Fig. 7. Frustule showing broad dorsal part of some girdle bands. Scale bars: Figs 1–5, 7 = 10 µm, Fig. 6 = 5 µm. Unless indicated otherwise, all light microscopy (LM) was with differential interference contrast (DIC).	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFFF0B04FF357CCBFCA0FD34.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581744/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581744	Figures 8–14. Auricula and “Bacillaria.” Figs 8, 9. Auricula densistriata. Figs. 10–14. “Bacillaria Group B” sensu Schmidt, var. tumidula. Fig. 10. Acid cleaned frustules in LM. Fig. 11. Live cell. Fig. 12. Internal valve surface, SEM. Fig. 13. Wider central part of cell in SEM, showing external short cristae (arrow). Fig. 14. Apex of frustule in SEM showing the raphe flap (arrow) that links cells together and girdle bands. Scale bars: Fig. 11 = 25 µm, Fig. 10 = 10 µm, Figs 8, 9, 12–14 = 5 µm.	Figures 8–14. Auricula and “Bacillaria.” Figs 8, 9. Auricula densistriata. Figs. 10–14. “Bacillaria Group B” sensu Schmidt, var. tumidula. Fig. 10. Acid cleaned frustules in LM. Fig. 11. Live cell. Fig. 12. Internal valve surface, SEM. Fig. 13. Wider central part of cell in SEM, showing external short cristae (arrow). Fig. 14. Apex of frustule in SEM showing the raphe flap (arrow) that links cells together and girdle bands. Scale bars: Fig. 11 = 25 µm, Fig. 10 = 10 µm, Figs 8, 9, 12–14 = 5 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFFF0B04FF357E12FEA8FB13.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581744/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581744	Figures 8–14. Auricula and “Bacillaria.” Figs 8, 9. Auricula densistriata. Figs. 10–14. “Bacillaria Group B” sensu Schmidt, var. tumidula. Fig. 10. Acid cleaned frustules in LM. Fig. 11. Live cell. Fig. 12. Internal valve surface, SEM. Fig. 13. Wider central part of cell in SEM, showing external short cristae (arrow). Fig. 14. Apex of frustule in SEM showing the raphe flap (arrow) that links cells together and girdle bands. Scale bars: Fig. 11 = 25 µm, Fig. 10 = 10 µm, Figs 8, 9, 12–14 = 5 µm.	Figures 8–14. Auricula and “Bacillaria.” Figs 8, 9. Auricula densistriata. Figs. 10–14. “Bacillaria Group B” sensu Schmidt, var. tumidula. Fig. 10. Acid cleaned frustules in LM. Fig. 11. Live cell. Fig. 12. Internal valve surface, SEM. Fig. 13. Wider central part of cell in SEM, showing external short cristae (arrow). Fig. 14. Apex of frustule in SEM showing the raphe flap (arrow) that links cells together and girdle bands. Scale bars: Fig. 11 = 25 µm, Fig. 10 = 10 µm, Figs 8, 9, 12–14 = 5 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFFF0B02FF357839FEC0FE1F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581748/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581748	Figures 15–19. Berkeleya cf. hyalina. Figs 15, 16. Living macroscopic colonies in dissection microscope and low power compound microscope. Figs 17, 18. Detail of living cells in colony showing central plastids (cells all in girdle view). Fig. 19. Acid cleaned valve showing hyaline character. Scale bars: Fig. 15 = 1 mm, Fig. 16 = 100 µm, Fig. 17 = 25 µm, Figs 18–20 = 10 µm, Figs 21, 22 = 5 µm.	Figures 15–19. Berkeleya cf. hyalina. Figs 15, 16. Living macroscopic colonies in dissection microscope and low power compound microscope. Figs 17, 18. Detail of living cells in colony showing central plastids (cells all in girdle view). Fig. 19. Acid cleaned valve showing hyaline character. Scale bars: Fig. 15 = 1 mm, Fig. 16 = 100 µm, Fig. 17 = 25 µm, Figs 18–20 = 10 µm, Figs 21, 22 = 5 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFFF0B02FF357839FEC0FE1F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581750/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581750	Figures 20–25. Berkeleya cf. hyalina. Frustules in SEM from whole mount. Fig. 20. Whole frustule. Fig. 21. Central portion showing row of larger areolae along one side of raphe (arrow) and distance between the slightly curved central raphe endings. Fig. 22. Apex of frustule shown in Fig. 20, with detail of terminal raphe ending and apical poration. Fig. 23. High resolution detail of the larger areolae with a papilla at the end of each vimen (arrow) vs. regular quadrate areolae (courtesy of Rafał Wróbel, U. Szczecin). Figs 24, 25. Berkeleya sp. from Majuro (M2-13). Fig. 24. External valve face showing central gap between raphe endings, unilateral zone of long areolae. Fig. 25. Internal aspect of apex. Scale bars: Figs 20, 21 = 10 µm, Figs 24, 25 = 5 µm, Fig. 22 = 2 µm, Fig. 23 = 1 µm.	Figures 20–25. Berkeleya cf. hyalina. Frustules in SEM from whole mount. Fig. 20. Whole frustule. Fig. 21. Central portion showing row of larger areolae along one side of raphe (arrow) and distance between the slightly curved central raphe endings. Fig. 22. Apex of frustule shown in Fig. 20, with detail of terminal raphe ending and apical poration. Fig. 23. High resolution detail of the larger areolae with a papilla at the end of each vimen (arrow) vs. regular quadrate areolae (courtesy of Rafał Wróbel, U. Szczecin). Figs 24, 25. Berkeleya sp. from Majuro (M2-13). Fig. 24. External valve face showing central gap between raphe endings, unilateral zone of long areolae. Fig. 25. Internal aspect of apex. Scale bars: Figs 20, 21 = 10 µm, Figs 24, 25 = 5 µm, Fig. 22 = 2 µm, Fig. 23 = 1 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFF90B02FF357CDCFEA4FB47.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581752/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581752	Figures 26–31. Biddulphiella and Biremis. Figs. 23–26. Biddulphiella tridens. Fig. 26. Frustule in valve view at two focal planes. Figs 27, 28. Valves in girdle and valve view, respectively, SEM. Fig. 29. Valve in oblique view, emphasizing the deep grooves (sulci) between the elevations. Figs. 30, 31. Biremis ambigua frustules in SEM. Fig. 30. Oblique view showing raphe and paired external alveolus openings. Fig. 31. Broken frustule showing internal side of alveoli (arrow) and exterior of girdle bands. Scale bars = 10 µm.	Figures 26–31. Biddulphiella and Biremis. Figs. 23–26. Biddulphiella tridens. Fig. 26. Frustule in valve view at two focal planes. Figs 27, 28. Valves in girdle and valve view, respectively, SEM. Fig. 29. Valve in oblique view, emphasizing the deep grooves (sulci) between the elevations. Figs. 30, 31. Biremis ambigua frustules in SEM. Fig. 30. Oblique view showing raphe and paired external alveolus openings. Fig. 31. Broken frustule showing internal side of alveoli (arrow) and exterior of girdle bands. Scale bars = 10 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFF90B02FF3579E5FE7FF9D9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581752/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581752	Figures 26–31. Biddulphiella and Biremis. Figs. 23–26. Biddulphiella tridens. Fig. 26. Frustule in valve view at two focal planes. Figs 27, 28. Valves in girdle and valve view, respectively, SEM. Fig. 29. Valve in oblique view, emphasizing the deep grooves (sulci) between the elevations. Figs. 30, 31. Biremis ambigua frustules in SEM. Fig. 30. Oblique view showing raphe and paired external alveolus openings. Fig. 31. Broken frustule showing internal side of alveoli (arrow) and exterior of girdle bands. Scale bars = 10 µm.	Figures 26–31. Biddulphiella and Biremis. Figs. 23–26. Biddulphiella tridens. Fig. 26. Frustule in valve view at two focal planes. Figs 27, 28. Valves in girdle and valve view, respectively, SEM. Fig. 29. Valve in oblique view, emphasizing the deep grooves (sulci) between the elevations. Figs. 30, 31. Biremis ambigua frustules in SEM. Fig. 30. Oblique view showing raphe and paired external alveolus openings. Fig. 31. Broken frustule showing internal side of alveoli (arrow) and exterior of girdle bands. Scale bars = 10 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFF90B01FF357B6EFD68FD4F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581754/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581754	Figures 32–38. Biremis and Campylodiscus. Figs. 32–37. Biremis ridicula. Fig. 32. Frustule in “ventral” girdle view, LM. Fig. 33. Valve and girdle bands in girdle view at two focal planes, LM. Fig. 34. Valve, interior view, SEM. Fig. 35. Frustule in “ventral” girdle view. Fig. 36. Valve in valve view showing asymmetry. Fig. 37. Detail of Fig. 34 showing alveoli and asymmetry. Fig. 38. Campylodiscus robertsianus valve in LM. Scale bars: Fig. 38 = 25 µm, Figs 32–36 = 10 µm, Fig. 37 = 5 µm.	Figures 32–38. Biremis and Campylodiscus. Figs. 32–37. Biremis ridicula. Fig. 32. Frustule in “ventral” girdle view, LM. Fig. 33. Valve and girdle bands in girdle view at two focal planes, LM. Fig. 34. Valve, interior view, SEM. Fig. 35. Frustule in “ventral” girdle view. Fig. 36. Valve in valve view showing asymmetry. Fig. 37. Detail of Fig. 34 showing alveoli and asymmetry. Fig. 38. Campylodiscus robertsianus valve in LM. Scale bars: Fig. 38 = 25 µm, Figs 32–36 = 10 µm, Fig. 37 = 5 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFFA0B01FF357F9DFB31F99E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581754/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581754	Figures 32–38. Biremis and Campylodiscus. Figs. 32–37. Biremis ridicula. Fig. 32. Frustule in “ventral” girdle view, LM. Fig. 33. Valve and girdle bands in girdle view at two focal planes, LM. Fig. 34. Valve, interior view, SEM. Fig. 35. Frustule in “ventral” girdle view. Fig. 36. Valve in valve view showing asymmetry. Fig. 37. Detail of Fig. 34 showing alveoli and asymmetry. Fig. 38. Campylodiscus robertsianus valve in LM. Scale bars: Fig. 38 = 25 µm, Figs 32–36 = 10 µm, Fig. 37 = 5 µm.	Figures 32–38. Biremis and Campylodiscus. Figs. 32–37. Biremis ridicula. Fig. 32. Frustule in “ventral” girdle view, LM. Fig. 33. Valve and girdle bands in girdle view at two focal planes, LM. Fig. 34. Valve, interior view, SEM. Fig. 35. Frustule in “ventral” girdle view. Fig. 36. Valve in valve view showing asymmetry. Fig. 37. Detail of Fig. 34 showing alveoli and asymmetry. Fig. 38. Campylodiscus robertsianus valve in LM. Scale bars: Fig. 38 = 25 µm, Figs 32–36 = 10 µm, Fig. 37 = 5 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFFA0B00FF357BACFC74FEE6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581759/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581759	Figures 39–43. Figs. 39–41. Cocconeis carinata. Fig. 39. Cluster of cells in LM. Fig. 40. Sternum valve. Fig. 41. Raphe valve. Figs. 42, 43. Coscinodiscus hauckii in LM and SEM. Scale bars: Figs 39, 42 = 10 µm, Fig. 43 = 5 µm, Figs 40, 41 = 1 µm.	Figures 39–43. Figs. 39–41. Cocconeis carinata. Fig. 39. Cluster of cells in LM. Fig. 40. Sternum valve. Fig. 41. Raphe valve. Figs. 42, 43. Coscinodiscus hauckii in LM and SEM. Scale bars: Figs 39, 42 = 10 µm, Fig. 43 = 5 µm, Figs 40, 41 = 1 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFFB0B00FF357C44FB29FCF6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581759/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581759	Figures 39–43. Figs. 39–41. Cocconeis carinata. Fig. 39. Cluster of cells in LM. Fig. 40. Sternum valve. Fig. 41. Raphe valve. Figs. 42, 43. Coscinodiscus hauckii in LM and SEM. Scale bars: Figs 39, 42 = 10 µm, Fig. 43 = 5 µm, Figs 40, 41 = 1 µm.	Figures 39–43. Figs. 39–41. Cocconeis carinata. Fig. 39. Cluster of cells in LM. Fig. 40. Sternum valve. Fig. 41. Raphe valve. Figs. 42, 43. Coscinodiscus hauckii in LM and SEM. Scale bars: Figs 39, 42 = 10 µm, Fig. 43 = 5 µm, Figs 40, 41 = 1 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFFB0B0FFF357E53FEF3FB15.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581761/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581761	Figures 44–49. Dictyoneis apapae, sp. nov. Figs 44, 45 LM, all others SEM. Fig. 44. Holotype (stack of two focal planes), slightly oblique, showing apparent striae and apparent chambers on near side. Fig. 45. Valve straight on, central nodule focal plane. Fig. 46. Valve in SEM showing external side of pseudoloculi; note opposite deflection of terminal raphe endings (arrows); enlarged in next two figures. Fig. 47. Detail of apex showing large groove in mantle and two rows of pores in the valvocopula (VC). Fig. 48. Detail of central area showing double layer of external pseudoloculi; also showing external raphe slits bordered by thin ridges of silica (arrow), and absence of circular area of small pseudoloculi. Fig. 49. Detail of marginal pseudoloculi. Scale bars: Figs 44–46 = 10 µm, Figs 47–49 = 5 µm.	Figures 44–49. Dictyoneis apapae, sp. nov. Figs 44, 45 LM, all others SEM. Fig. 44. Holotype (stack of two focal planes), slightly oblique, showing apparent striae and apparent chambers on near side. Fig. 45. Valve straight on, central nodule focal plane. Fig. 46. Valve in SEM showing external side of pseudoloculi; note opposite deflection of terminal raphe endings (arrows); enlarged in next two figures. Fig. 47. Detail of apex showing large groove in mantle and two rows of pores in the valvocopula (VC). Fig. 48. Detail of central area showing double layer of external pseudoloculi; also showing external raphe slits bordered by thin ridges of silica (arrow), and absence of circular area of small pseudoloculi. Fig. 49. Detail of marginal pseudoloculi. Scale bars: Figs 44–46 = 10 µm, Figs 47–49 = 5 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFFB0B0FFF357E53FEF3FB15.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581763/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581763	Figures 50–58. Dictyoneis apapae, sp. nov. (cont.), except Figs 51, 56, putative D. marginata from Gray’s Reef National Marine Sanctuary, Georgia; SEM, cont. Figs. 50, 51. Comparison of the two species’ exteriors with the following three points of distinction: 1. Central area; 2. Marginal pseudoloculi; 3. Apical groove. Fig. 52. Detail of an isolated valve apex. Fig. 53. Central region of isolated valve showing central nodule and poration on mantle with short intercalary striae, with a few longer (arrowhead), forming a denser band (arrow) before a hyaline border. Fig. 54. Fractured valve showing wall structure with large outer pores (arrow), smaller ridges defining smaller holes, and showing the slit-like inner foramina. Figs 55, 56. Comparison of the two species’ interiors, both valves with valvocopula. Figs 57, 58. Opposite poles of a frustule in girdle view showing copulae. Arrow shows deep indent on end of valvocopula, which appears closed at that end as well as at the opposite; 2nd copula open and 3rd copula with large ligule that fills the indentation on the valvocopula. Scale bars: Figs 50, 51, 55–58 = 10 µm, Figs 52, 53 = 5 µm, Fig. 54 = 2 µm.	Figures 50–58. Dictyoneis apapae, sp. nov. (cont.), except Figs 51, 56, putative D. marginata from Gray’s Reef National Marine Sanctuary, Georgia; SEM, cont. Figs. 50, 51. Comparison of the two species’ exteriors with the following three points of distinction: 1. Central area; 2. Marginal pseudoloculi; 3. Apical groove. Fig. 52. Detail of an isolated valve apex. Fig. 53. Central region of isolated valve showing central nodule and poration on mantle with short intercalary striae, with a few longer (arrowhead), forming a denser band (arrow) before a hyaline border. Fig. 54. Fractured valve showing wall structure with large outer pores (arrow), smaller ridges defining smaller holes, and showing the slit-like inner foramina. Figs 55, 56. Comparison of the two species’ interiors, both valves with valvocopula. Figs 57, 58. Opposite poles of a frustule in girdle view showing copulae. Arrow shows deep indent on end of valvocopula, which appears closed at that end as well as at the opposite; 2nd copula open and 3rd copula with large ligule that fills the indentation on the valvocopula. Scale bars: Figs 50, 51, 55–58 = 10 µm, Figs 52, 53 = 5 µm, Fig. 54 = 2 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFF50B0EFF357DCEFB64FDAC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581767/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581767	Figures 59–62. Hyalosynedra laevigata. Figs 59, 62. External view and detail of apex showing hyaline tip beyond the rimoportula opening (arrow) and the three rows of pores in the ocellulimbus. Figs 60, 61. Internal view with detail of apex showing character of the rimoportula (arrow). Scale bars: Figs 59, 60 = 10 µm, Fig. 61 = 2 µm, Fig. 62 = 1 µm.	Figures 59–62. Hyalosynedra laevigata. Figs 59, 62. External view and detail of apex showing hyaline tip beyond the rimoportula opening (arrow) and the three rows of pores in the ocellulimbus. Figs 60, 61. Internal view with detail of apex showing character of the rimoportula (arrow). Scale bars: Figs 59, 60 = 10 µm, Fig. 61 = 2 µm, Fig. 62 = 1 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFF50B0EFF357FB9FCF5FB82.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581769/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581769	Figures 63–64. Licmophora complanata, LM. Fig. 63. Valve with valvocopula (vc); very narrow valve with deep mantle, vc even deeper; long septum, mostly along the abvalvar edge of vc (arrow) except where it continues the arc over ligule (arrowhead) and toward base where it crosses to advalvar edge of vc. Fig. 64. Frustule in girdle view. Scale bars = 10 µm.	Figures 63–64. Licmophora complanata, LM. Fig. 63. Valve with valvocopula (vc); very narrow valve with deep mantle, vc even deeper; long septum, mostly along the abvalvar edge of vc (arrow) except where it continues the arc over ligule (arrowhead) and toward base where it crosses to advalvar edge of vc. Fig. 64. Frustule in girdle view. Scale bars = 10 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFF50B0EFF3579A8FC30F944.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581771/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581771	Figures 65–70. Mastogloia. Figs 65, 66. Mastogloia ovata exterior and interior valve faces. Fig. 67. Mastogloia pseudolatecostata (Bikar Atoll, Marshall Is.), external valve face with part of valvocopula showing partecta. Figs. 68–70. Mastogloia cf. pisciculus. Fig.68. LM (DIC) with foci on valve face and partecta Arrows on this and next image point to longitudinal rib bisecting the inner zone. Fig. 69. External surface, SEM. Fig. 70. Internal valve face and partecta, also showing partly double row of areolae (arrow). Scale bars: Figs 67, 68 = 10 µm, Figs 65, 66, 69, 70 = 5 µm.	Figures 65–70. Mastogloia. Figs 65, 66. Mastogloia ovata exterior and interior valve faces. Fig. 67. Mastogloia pseudolatecostata (Bikar Atoll, Marshall Is.), external valve face with part of valvocopula showing partecta. Figs. 68–70. Mastogloia cf. pisciculus. Fig.68. LM (DIC) with foci on valve face and partecta Arrows on this and next image point to longitudinal rib bisecting the inner zone. Fig. 69. External surface, SEM. Fig. 70. Internal valve face and partecta, also showing partly double row of areolae (arrow). Scale bars: Figs 67, 68 = 10 µm, Figs 65, 66, 69, 70 = 5 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFF50B0DFF357BE2FDDEFB53.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581771/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581771	Figures 65–70. Mastogloia. Figs 65, 66. Mastogloia ovata exterior and interior valve faces. Fig. 67. Mastogloia pseudolatecostata (Bikar Atoll, Marshall Is.), external valve face with part of valvocopula showing partecta. Figs. 68–70. Mastogloia cf. pisciculus. Fig.68. LM (DIC) with foci on valve face and partecta Arrows on this and next image point to longitudinal rib bisecting the inner zone. Fig. 69. External surface, SEM. Fig. 70. Internal valve face and partecta, also showing partly double row of areolae (arrow). Scale bars: Figs 67, 68 = 10 µm, Figs 65, 66, 69, 70 = 5 µm.	Figures 65–70. Mastogloia. Figs 65, 66. Mastogloia ovata exterior and interior valve faces. Fig. 67. Mastogloia pseudolatecostata (Bikar Atoll, Marshall Is.), external valve face with part of valvocopula showing partecta. Figs. 68–70. Mastogloia cf. pisciculus. Fig.68. LM (DIC) with foci on valve face and partecta Arrows on this and next image point to longitudinal rib bisecting the inner zone. Fig. 69. External surface, SEM. Fig. 70. Internal valve face and partecta, also showing partly double row of areolae (arrow). Scale bars: Figs 67, 68 = 10 µm, Figs 65, 66, 69, 70 = 5 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFF60B0DFF3579F8FB7FF8D8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581773/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581773	Figures 71–80. Moreneis, Nitzschia and Olifantiella. SEM except Fig. 71. Figs 71–74. Moreneis hexagona. Fig. 71. Valve in LM (DIC). Fig. 72. Valve exterior, showing isolated pores at the Voigt faults (arrows). Fig. 73. Valve exterior detail showing central raphe endings characteristic of the genus and c-shaped areolae. Fig. 74. Valve interior. Figs 75–78. Nitzschia incurva. Figs 75, 76. Guam voucher frustules at different angles. Figs 77, 78. Yap specimens showing interior and details of areolae. Figs 79, 80. Olifantiella mascarenica frustule showing the characteristic buciniportula (arrow). Scale bars: Fig 75 = 10 µm, Figs 71, 72, 74, 76, 77 = 5 µm, Figs 73, 78 = 2 µm, Figs 79, 80 = 1 µm.	Figures 71–80. Moreneis, Nitzschia and Olifantiella. SEM except Fig. 71. Figs 71–74. Moreneis hexagona. Fig. 71. Valve in LM (DIC). Fig. 72. Valve exterior, showing isolated pores at the Voigt faults (arrows). Fig. 73. Valve exterior detail showing central raphe endings characteristic of the genus and c-shaped areolae. Fig. 74. Valve interior. Figs 75–78. Nitzschia incurva. Figs 75, 76. Guam voucher frustules at different angles. Figs 77, 78. Yap specimens showing interior and details of areolae. Figs 79, 80. Olifantiella mascarenica frustule showing the characteristic buciniportula (arrow). Scale bars: Fig 75 = 10 µm, Figs 71, 72, 74, 76, 77 = 5 µm, Figs 73, 78 = 2 µm, Figs 79, 80 = 1 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFF70B0CFF357DCEFD49FBD2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581773/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581773	Figures 71–80. Moreneis, Nitzschia and Olifantiella. SEM except Fig. 71. Figs 71–74. Moreneis hexagona. Fig. 71. Valve in LM (DIC). Fig. 72. Valve exterior, showing isolated pores at the Voigt faults (arrows). Fig. 73. Valve exterior detail showing central raphe endings characteristic of the genus and c-shaped areolae. Fig. 74. Valve interior. Figs 75–78. Nitzschia incurva. Figs 75, 76. Guam voucher frustules at different angles. Figs 77, 78. Yap specimens showing interior and details of areolae. Figs 79, 80. Olifantiella mascarenica frustule showing the characteristic buciniportula (arrow). Scale bars: Fig 75 = 10 µm, Figs 71, 72, 74, 76, 77 = 5 µm, Figs 73, 78 = 2 µm, Figs 79, 80 = 1 µm.	Figures 71–80. Moreneis, Nitzschia and Olifantiella. SEM except Fig. 71. Figs 71–74. Moreneis hexagona. Fig. 71. Valve in LM (DIC). Fig. 72. Valve exterior, showing isolated pores at the Voigt faults (arrows). Fig. 73. Valve exterior detail showing central raphe endings characteristic of the genus and c-shaped areolae. Fig. 74. Valve interior. Figs 75–78. Nitzschia incurva. Figs 75, 76. Guam voucher frustules at different angles. Figs 77, 78. Yap specimens showing interior and details of areolae. Figs 79, 80. Olifantiella mascarenica frustule showing the characteristic buciniportula (arrow). Scale bars: Fig 75 = 10 µm, Figs 71, 72, 74, 76, 77 = 5 µm, Figs 73, 78 = 2 µm, Figs 79, 80 = 1 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFF70B0CFF357978FBDFFA4A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581773/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581773	Figures 71–80. Moreneis, Nitzschia and Olifantiella. SEM except Fig. 71. Figs 71–74. Moreneis hexagona. Fig. 71. Valve in LM (DIC). Fig. 72. Valve exterior, showing isolated pores at the Voigt faults (arrows). Fig. 73. Valve exterior detail showing central raphe endings characteristic of the genus and c-shaped areolae. Fig. 74. Valve interior. Figs 75–78. Nitzschia incurva. Figs 75, 76. Guam voucher frustules at different angles. Figs 77, 78. Yap specimens showing interior and details of areolae. Figs 79, 80. Olifantiella mascarenica frustule showing the characteristic buciniportula (arrow). Scale bars: Fig 75 = 10 µm, Figs 71, 72, 74, 76, 77 = 5 µm, Figs 73, 78 = 2 µm, Figs 79, 80 = 1 µm.	Figures 71–80. Moreneis, Nitzschia and Olifantiella. SEM except Fig. 71. Figs 71–74. Moreneis hexagona. Fig. 71. Valve in LM (DIC). Fig. 72. Valve exterior, showing isolated pores at the Voigt faults (arrows). Fig. 73. Valve exterior detail showing central raphe endings characteristic of the genus and c-shaped areolae. Fig. 74. Valve interior. Figs 75–78. Nitzschia incurva. Figs 75, 76. Guam voucher frustules at different angles. Figs 77, 78. Yap specimens showing interior and details of areolae. Figs 79, 80. Olifantiella mascarenica frustule showing the characteristic buciniportula (arrow). Scale bars: Fig 75 = 10 µm, Figs 71, 72, 74, 76, 77 = 5 µm, Figs 73, 78 = 2 µm, Figs 79, 80 = 1 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFF70B0CFF3578E0FB77F9BD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581775/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581775	Figures 81–86. Parlibellus and Plagiogramma, SEM except Fig. 81. Figs 81–84. Parlibellus biblos. Fig. 81. Live cell showing plastids. Fig. 82. General view of portion of valve. Fig. 83. Detail of apex showing concentric circles of areolae around the raphe ending. Fig. 84. Detail of interior showing the stauros as a transverse bar not visible from outside. Figs 85, 86. Plagiogramma minor in girdle and valve view. Scale bars: Figs 81, 82 = 10 µm, Figs 84, 85, 86 = 5 µm, Fig. 83= 2 µm.	Figures 81–86. Parlibellus and Plagiogramma, SEM except Fig. 81. Figs 81–84. Parlibellus biblos. Fig. 81. Live cell showing plastids. Fig. 82. General view of portion of valve. Fig. 83. Detail of apex showing concentric circles of areolae around the raphe ending. Fig. 84. Detail of interior showing the stauros as a transverse bar not visible from outside. Figs 85, 86. Plagiogramma minor in girdle and valve view. Scale bars: Figs 81, 82 = 10 µm, Figs 84, 85, 86 = 5 µm, Fig. 83= 2 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFF70B0BFF357B8AFAADFE30.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581775/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581775	Figures 81–86. Parlibellus and Plagiogramma, SEM except Fig. 81. Figs 81–84. Parlibellus biblos. Fig. 81. Live cell showing plastids. Fig. 82. General view of portion of valve. Fig. 83. Detail of apex showing concentric circles of areolae around the raphe ending. Fig. 84. Detail of interior showing the stauros as a transverse bar not visible from outside. Figs 85, 86. Plagiogramma minor in girdle and valve view. Scale bars: Figs 81, 82 = 10 µm, Figs 84, 85, 86 = 5 µm, Fig. 83= 2 µm.	Figures 81–86. Parlibellus and Plagiogramma, SEM except Fig. 81. Figs 81–84. Parlibellus biblos. Fig. 81. Live cell showing plastids. Fig. 82. General view of portion of valve. Fig. 83. Detail of apex showing concentric circles of areolae around the raphe ending. Fig. 84. Detail of interior showing the stauros as a transverse bar not visible from outside. Figs 85, 86. Plagiogramma minor in girdle and valve view. Scale bars: Figs 81, 82 = 10 µm, Figs 84, 85, 86 = 5 µm, Fig. 83= 2 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFF00B0BFF35792CFE7BF925.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581777/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581777	Figures 87–90. Proschkinia complanata, SEM. Fig. 87. Entire recently divided frustule showing two external valve faces and one internal, along with numerous girdle bands. Fig. 88. Detail of central area showing short stria on side with fistula (arrow) and flap covering fistula opening (arrowhead). Figs. 89, 90. Central area internal views showing fistula and accessory pores (arrows, Fig. 89); elevated raphe rib (arrow, Fig. 90). (Fig. 89 is detail of frustule in Fig. 87.) Scale bars: Fig. 87 = 5 µm, Figs 88, 90 = 2 µm, Fig. 89 = 1 µm.	Figures 87–90. Proschkinia complanata, SEM. Fig. 87. Entire recently divided frustule showing two external valve faces and one internal, along with numerous girdle bands. Fig. 88. Detail of central area showing short stria on side with fistula (arrow) and flap covering fistula opening (arrowhead). Figs. 89, 90. Central area internal views showing fistula and accessory pores (arrows, Fig. 89); elevated raphe rib (arrow, Fig. 90). (Fig. 89 is detail of frustule in Fig. 87.) Scale bars: Fig. 87 = 5 µm, Figs 88, 90 = 2 µm, Fig. 89 = 1 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFF20B09FF357DCEFDE3FD4E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581781/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581781	Figures 91–97. Pseudictyota and Serratifera, SEM except Fig. 91. Figs 91–93. Pseudictyota bicorne. Fig. 91. Frustule in girdle view, stacked focal planes. Figs 92, 93. Valve view in SEM and detail of pseudoloculi. Figs. 94, 95. Serratifera andersonii frustules in valve and girdle view. Figs. 96, 97. Serratifera rhombica frustules in valve and girdle view. Scale bars: Fig. 91 = 10 µm, Fig. 92 = 15 µm, Fig. 93 = 5 µm, Figs 94–97 = 2 µm.	Figures 91–97. Pseudictyota and Serratifera, SEM except Fig. 91. Figs 91–93. Pseudictyota bicorne. Fig. 91. Frustule in girdle view, stacked focal planes. Figs 92, 93. Valve view in SEM and detail of pseudoloculi. Figs. 94, 95. Serratifera andersonii frustules in valve and girdle view. Figs. 96, 97. Serratifera rhombica frustules in valve and girdle view. Scale bars: Fig. 91 = 10 µm, Fig. 92 = 15 µm, Fig. 93 = 5 µm, Figs 94–97 = 2 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFF20B09FF357F9BFE17FA90.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581781/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581781	Figures 91–97. Pseudictyota and Serratifera, SEM except Fig. 91. Figs 91–93. Pseudictyota bicorne. Fig. 91. Frustule in girdle view, stacked focal planes. Figs 92, 93. Valve view in SEM and detail of pseudoloculi. Figs. 94, 95. Serratifera andersonii frustules in valve and girdle view. Figs. 96, 97. Serratifera rhombica frustules in valve and girdle view. Scale bars: Fig. 91 = 10 µm, Fig. 92 = 15 µm, Fig. 93 = 5 µm, Figs 94–97 = 2 µm.	Figures 91–97. Pseudictyota and Serratifera, SEM except Fig. 91. Figs 91–93. Pseudictyota bicorne. Fig. 91. Frustule in girdle view, stacked focal planes. Figs 92, 93. Valve view in SEM and detail of pseudoloculi. Figs. 94, 95. Serratifera andersonii frustules in valve and girdle view. Figs. 96, 97. Serratifera rhombica frustules in valve and girdle view. Scale bars: Fig. 91 = 10 µm, Fig. 92 = 15 µm, Fig. 93 = 5 µm, Figs 94–97 = 2 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFF20B09FF3578B6FDF2F9B4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581781/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581781	Figures 91–97. Pseudictyota and Serratifera, SEM except Fig. 91. Figs 91–93. Pseudictyota bicorne. Fig. 91. Frustule in girdle view, stacked focal planes. Figs 92, 93. Valve view in SEM and detail of pseudoloculi. Figs. 94, 95. Serratifera andersonii frustules in valve and girdle view. Figs. 96, 97. Serratifera rhombica frustules in valve and girdle view. Scale bars: Fig. 91 = 10 µm, Fig. 92 = 15 µm, Fig. 93 = 5 µm, Figs 94–97 = 2 µm.	Figures 91–97. Pseudictyota and Serratifera, SEM except Fig. 91. Figs 91–93. Pseudictyota bicorne. Fig. 91. Frustule in girdle view, stacked focal planes. Figs 92, 93. Valve view in SEM and detail of pseudoloculi. Figs. 94, 95. Serratifera andersonii frustules in valve and girdle view. Figs. 96, 97. Serratifera rhombica frustules in valve and girdle view. Scale bars: Fig. 91 = 10 µm, Fig. 92 = 15 µm, Fig. 93 = 5 µm, Figs 94–97 = 2 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFF20B08FF357B91FB95FCE0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581783/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581783	Figures 98–106. Stricosus and Thalassiosira. Figs 98–103. Stricosus harrisonii. Figs 98, 99. Living cells showing plastids with pyrenoids. Figs 100, 101. Acid cleaned valves in LM and SEM. Fig. 102. External apex showing triangular hyaline area, two spines, rimoportula opening, and ocellulimbus with at least 7 rows of pores (contrast Fig. 62, Hyalosynedra). Fig. 103. Apex internal view showing symmetrical rimoportula (arrow). Figs 104–106. Thalassiosira nanolineata. Fig. 104. Valve in LM at two focal planes. Fig. 105, 106. External and internal aspects in SEM, showing central fultoportulae (F) and rimoportula (R) (arrows). Scale bars: Figs 98, 100, 101 = 20 µm, Fig 104 = 10 µm, Figs 99, 103, 105, 106 = 5 µm, Fig. 102 = 2 µm.	Figures 98–106. Stricosus and Thalassiosira. Figs 98–103. Stricosus harrisonii. Figs 98, 99. Living cells showing plastids with pyrenoids. Figs 100, 101. Acid cleaned valves in LM and SEM. Fig. 102. External apex showing triangular hyaline area, two spines, rimoportula opening, and ocellulimbus with at least 7 rows of pores (contrast Fig. 62, Hyalosynedra). Fig. 103. Apex internal view showing symmetrical rimoportula (arrow). Figs 104–106. Thalassiosira nanolineata. Fig. 104. Valve in LM at two focal planes. Fig. 105, 106. External and internal aspects in SEM, showing central fultoportulae (F) and rimoportula (R) (arrows). Scale bars: Figs 98, 100, 101 = 20 µm, Fig 104 = 10 µm, Figs 99, 103, 105, 106 = 5 µm, Fig. 102 = 2 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFF30B08FF357E45FD32FAF0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581783/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581783	Figures 98–106. Stricosus and Thalassiosira. Figs 98–103. Stricosus harrisonii. Figs 98, 99. Living cells showing plastids with pyrenoids. Figs 100, 101. Acid cleaned valves in LM and SEM. Fig. 102. External apex showing triangular hyaline area, two spines, rimoportula opening, and ocellulimbus with at least 7 rows of pores (contrast Fig. 62, Hyalosynedra). Fig. 103. Apex internal view showing symmetrical rimoportula (arrow). Figs 104–106. Thalassiosira nanolineata. Fig. 104. Valve in LM at two focal planes. Fig. 105, 106. External and internal aspects in SEM, showing central fultoportulae (F) and rimoportula (R) (arrows). Scale bars: Figs 98, 100, 101 = 20 µm, Fig 104 = 10 µm, Figs 99, 103, 105, 106 = 5 µm, Fig. 102 = 2 µm.	Figures 98–106. Stricosus and Thalassiosira. Figs 98–103. Stricosus harrisonii. Figs 98, 99. Living cells showing plastids with pyrenoids. Figs 100, 101. Acid cleaned valves in LM and SEM. Fig. 102. External apex showing triangular hyaline area, two spines, rimoportula opening, and ocellulimbus with at least 7 rows of pores (contrast Fig. 62, Hyalosynedra). Fig. 103. Apex internal view showing symmetrical rimoportula (arrow). Figs 104–106. Thalassiosira nanolineata. Fig. 104. Valve in LM at two focal planes. Fig. 105, 106. External and internal aspects in SEM, showing central fultoportulae (F) and rimoportula (R) (arrows). Scale bars: Figs 98, 100, 101 = 20 µm, Fig 104 = 10 µm, Figs 99, 103, 105, 106 = 5 µm, Fig. 102 = 2 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFF30B08FF357856FEFFF8A2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581785/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581785	Figures 107–110. Tryblionella cf. jelinecki. Fig. 107. Valve in LM. Figs 108, 109. Valve external in SEM. Fig. 110. Valve apex internal aspect. Scale bars: Fig. 107 = 20 µm, Figs 108, 110 = 10 µm, Fig. 109 = 5 µm.	Figures 107–110. Tryblionella cf. jelinecki. Fig. 107. Valve in LM. Figs 108, 109. Valve external in SEM. Fig. 110. Valve apex internal aspect. Scale bars: Fig. 107 = 20 µm, Figs 108, 110 = 10 µm, Fig. 109 = 5 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
03C287AAFFEC0B17FF357C38FAB0FC54.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/12581787/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12581787	Figures 111–113. Vikingea cf. gibbocalyx. Fig. 111. Raphe valve in LM. Fig. 112. Sternum valve, exterior in SEM. Fig. 113. Broken frustule showing external raphe valve Scale bars: Fig. 111 = 10 µm, Figs 112, 113 = 5 µm.	Figures 111–113. Vikingea cf. gibbocalyx. Fig. 111. Raphe valve in LM. Fig. 112. Sternum valve, exterior in SEM. Fig. 113. Broken frustule showing external raphe valve Scale bars: Fig. 111 = 10 µm, Figs 112, 113 = 5 µm.	2024-06-06	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej		Zenodo	biologists	Lobban, Christopher S.;Witkowski, Andrzej			
