Dicerapanorpa

The BI ( Fig. 8) and ML trees ( Fig. 9) reveal four identical monophyletic clades (I –IV) of Dicerapanorpa , as mentioned above ( Fig. 2). The monophyly of most species was strongly supported, with a few exceptions. In clade I, D. lativalva was well supported to be monophyletic, whereas D. yijunae and D. kimminsi were paraphyletic. The samples of D. yijunae and D. kimminsi were mixed, forming a sister group to D. lativalva (PP = 1, BV = 99). In clade II, D. zhongdianensis , D. deqenensis Hu, Wang & Hua, 2019 and D. macula were strongly supported as monophyletic clades. Dicerapanorpa deqenensis was the sister species to D. macula , but the phylogenetic positions of D. zhongdianensis and Dicerapanorpa tjederi ( Carpenter, 1938) were inconsistent between the BI and ML trees. In clade III, all the species ( Dicerapanorpa tanae Hu, Wang & Hua, 2019 , Dicerapanorpa tenuis Hu, Wang & Hua, 2019 , Dicerapanorpa luojishana Hu & Hua, 2019 and D. diceras ) were well supported as monophyletic in the BI tree ( Fig. 8), whereas D. luojishana was paraphyletic with D. diceras in the ML tree ( Fig. 9). The phylogenetic positions of D. tanae and D. tenuis were uncertain because of the inconsistent topology in both trees. Clade IV was separated into two subclades with high support values (PP = 1, BV = 100). One subclade included D. shennongensis and D. baiyunshana , with