Rapala rosacea, de Nice, 1889
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5692.1.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8C3FC947-BE0C-41E0-9215-D2B9AFEDADC0 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0387897B-9676-4234-FF3B-FDBE3144F82D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rapala rosacea |
status |
|
11. R. rosacea de Nice View in CoL ́ville, [1889] Figs 1j View FIGURE 1 , 13 View FIGURE 13
Rapala rosacea de Nicéville, [1889] : 285
Type locality: Sikkim ( India)
Common Name: Rosy Flash
Material Examined: NEPAL. Gandaki Province. Kaski. Pokhara, Phewatal , 15.iii. 1986, 795 m, leg. C.P. Smith ( ANHM, 1♂); Rupatal, 29.ii. 1992, 370 m, leg. C.P. Smith ( ANHM, 1♂) . Syangja. Putalikhet, 6.ii. 1970, 855 m, leg. C.P. Smith ( ANHM, 1♂) ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 ) .
Wingspan: 38–40 mm ( Van der Poel & Smetacek 2022 for R. rectivitta )
Diagnosis ( Figs 13a, 13b View FIGURE 13 ): Rapala rosacea can be distinguished from its congeners by the narrow, often undulating dark brown postdiscal lines on its ventral wings, set against a vinous red or pink background, along with its pinkish palpi. The only other species with a similar pink background are R. rectivitta , R. nissa , and R. huangi , all of which have postdiscal lines with bronze color that are often wider. De Nicéville ([1889], p. 285) noted: “The reddish-vinous coloration of the underside at once distinguishes it from all the species of the genus known to me”.
Male Genitalia ( Figs 13c View FIGURE 13 ): Aedeagus with a short vesica, pointed to one side; valvae slender and elongated; cleft between the valvae more than half the length of the valval plate.
Biology: Not known; however, based on its seasonality, larvae potentially feed on the flowers of Rosaceae .
Natural History: Adults are typically found in forests, on flowers, particularly those of Rubus ellipticus Sm. , and along open rural trails.
Variation: Variation occurs in the postdiscal bands which can range from slightly broken to unbroken. Some individuals are potentially gray as discussed below in the remarks.
Phenology in Nepal: The rosy form flies mostly from February to mid-March after which a gray form takes over with similarly thin bands which might be R. nissa complex.
Elevation: 450– 2,200 m (personal observation)
Distribution on the Indian Subcontinent: Nepal, northeastern India ( Van Gasse 2018).
Distribution in Nepal: Kaski, Lamjung, and Lalitpur districts, but certainly more widespread across the hilly region.
Remarks: This species was recorded by Smith (1994, 2006, 2011a, 2011b) and later by Van der Poel & Smetacek (2022) as R. rectivitta . Colin Smith likely followed Evans (1932), who considered R. rosacea a form of R. rectivitta . Upon examination, all specimens previously identified as R. rectivitta in the studied Nepalese collections ( ANHM and SNHM) were found to represent either R. nissa , R. huangi , or R. rosacea . All authors of this study have recorded R. rosacea in Nepal: SKC from Kaski (Pokhara), Lamjung (Bhorletar), and Lalitpur (Godavari) districts; PvdP from Kaski (Pokhara) District; SP and AS from Kaski (Pokhara) District; and MSL from Lalitpur (Godavari) District. Notably, the rosy, reddish-vinous-colored R. rosacea occurs mostly from February to mid-March in Nepal, after which only grayer individuals are observed. This suggests that R. rosacea is an early spring univoltine butterfly in Nepal, emerging from February to mid-March after which only R. nissa complex, including R. rectivitta , flies. However, Inayoshi (2024) suggests that the phenology of R. rosacea extends until December in Thailand and Vietnam. Further research is needed on the phenology and possible morphological variation of this taxon.
SNHM |
Sudan Natural History Museum |
SP |
Instituto de Botânica |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |