Formicinae Latreille, 1809

Boudinot, Brendon E., 2015, Contributions to the knowledge of Formicidae (Hymenoptera, Aculeata): a new diagnosis of the family, the first global male-based key to subfamilies, and a treatment of early branching lineages, European Journal of Taxonomy 120, pp. 1-62 : 51-56

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2015.120

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:54714320-5726-44CB-8FF5-60E0B984873D

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3795067

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038E878C-FF9A-B152-FDEA-FC8DFEE71EE3

treatment provided by

Carolina

scientific name

Formicinae Latreille, 1809
status

 

Subfamily Formicinae Latreille, 1809 View in CoL

Figs 5I View Fig , 7B, F View Fig , 16 View Fig A–B

Diagnosis

The Formicinae are uniquely identified by the following combination of characters: mandibles never serrate; antennal toruli usually situated posterad posterior clypeal margin; antenna 8–13-merous; oblique mesopleural sulcus present; at most six closed cells present on forewing; jugal lobe absent; petiolar peduncle short to absent; petiole narrowly attached to abdominal segment III; abdominal segment III unpetiolated; abdominal segment IV without cinctus between pre- and postsclerites; abdominal sternum IX unpronged and edentate.

Comments

In terms of both number of described species (~3,000) and genera (51), the Formicinae is one of the most diverse lineages of ants. Genera of the Formicinae are relatively easily delimitable based on males (B. Boudinot, in prep.), but little work has been done to render males identifiable. Males are unknown or at least undescribed for seven genera ( Agraulomyrmex , Alloformica, Bregmatomyrmex , Forelophilus , Pseudonotoncus , Santschiella , Teratomyrmex ), and the identity of Echinopla and Phasmomyrmex is uncertain.

Ectaheteromorph clade

Fig. 16 View Fig B–C

Diagnosis

Male ectaheteromorphs are uniquely identified by the following combination of characters: mandibles triangular, multidentate; antennal toruli situated posterad anterior clypeal margin; tibial spur formula 1,1 or 2,2 (if 2,2 then prora anteriorly directed); crossvein 1m-cu present; abdominal segment III unpetiolated; cinctus present between the pre- and postsclerites of abdominal segment IV; abdominal sternum IX unpronged and edentate. The jugal lobes may be present or absent.

Comments

No nomothetic (single unique) character separates the males of Ectatomminae Emery, 1895 and Heteroponerinae Bolton, 2003 , which are better distinguished genus-by-genus. In brief, Typhlomyrmex may be distinguished by the scapes, which are longer than the compound eye; Acanthoponera males have

long maxillary palps, which almost reach the postocciput; Ectatomma (Neotropical) and Rhytidoponera (Australasian) are large and have jugal lobes. Heteroponera and Gnamptogenys are distinguishable globally only using conditional statements. Characters have been found to do this, and will be described in a forthcoming publication on the New World genera (B. Boudinot in prep.). The male of Aulacopone is unknown.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

SubOrder

Apocrita

InfraOrder

Aculeata

SuperFamily

Formicoidea

Family

Formicidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF