Eutichurus marquesae Bonaldo, 1994

Eutichurus marquesae Bonaldo, 1994 View in CoL

Figs 12 View FIGURE 12 , 29F View FIGURE 29 , 30F View FIGURE 30 , 32–33 View FIGURE 32 View FIGURE 33 , 35 View FIGURE 35

Eutichurus marquesae Bonaldo, 1994: 130 View in CoL , figs 80, 81 (female holotype, Colombia, Cundinamarca, Santa Fé de Bogotá, La Uvita, I.N. Maria leg., MNRJ 152, not examined); Bonaldo et al. 2018: 334 View Cited Treatment , figs 27–57 (male description).

Diagnosis. Males of E. marquesae Bonaldo, 1994 resemble those of E. paredesi Bonaldo & Saturnino, 2018 , E. madre Bonaldo, 1994 and E. luisdiazi sp. nov. by the MA with a long, retrolaterally directed median prong ( Bonaldo 1994: 130, figs 80–81; Bonaldo et al. 2018: 333, figs 23–25; Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ). but can be distinguished from E. paredesi Bonaldo & Saturnino, 2018 , E. madre Bonaldo, 1994 by the presence of a long embolar prolateral process inserted medially and from E. luisdiazi s p. nov. by the thinner prolateral process of the embolus and wide retrolateral tibial apophysis with the ventral tip projected (very wide prolateral process of the embolus, retrolateral tibial apophysis straight with ventral tip less projected in E. luisdiazi sp. nov.) ( Bonaldo 1994: 130, figs 80–81; Bonaldo et al. 2018: 333, figs 23–25; Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ). Females are similar to E. madre and E. luisdiazi sp. nov. by the epyginal posterior plate much longer than wide ( Bonaldo 1994: 130:80; 129, figs 79; Figs 12D View FIGURE 12 , 6D View FIGURE 6 , 7E View FIGURE 7 ). They can be distinguished from E. luisdiazi sp. nov. by the bottle-like posterior plate (subtriangular in E. luisdiazi sp. nov.) and from E. madre by having anterior projections less developed not covering posterior plates (anterior projections well developed covering part of the anterior region of posterior plates in E. madre ) ( Bonaldo 1994: 130:80; 129, figs 79; Figs 12D View FIGURE 12 , 10D View FIGURE 10 , 11E View FIGURE 11 ).

Description. See Bonaldo (1994: 130) and Bonaldo et al. (2018: 334). Additional documentation in Figs 12 View FIGURE 12 , 29F View FIGURE 29 , 30F View FIGURE 30 .

New records COLOMBIA, Boyacá: 1♂ , Ventaquemada ( 5°21′59.4″N; 73°31′3.75″W), 2630 m, 29.VII.2014, manual capture on grass, M. Cárdenas leg (ICN-Ar-9964) GoogleMaps ; 1♂, El Cucuy, Vereda El Carrizal ( 6°25′12.48″N; 72°25′54.33″W), 2850 m, 12.I.1999, manual capture, G. Mora leg. (MPUJ_ENT0087159) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, (); 1♂, Santuario y Flora Iguaque, Municipio Chízina , Finca Sorcido ( 5°36’N; 73°30’W), 2466 m, 2–22.IX.2003, malaise, P. Reina leg. (IAvH-I-3127) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, same locality and data of the previous specimen (IAvH-I-3128) GoogleMaps ; Cundinamarca: 1♂ , Soacha, Centro ( 4°33′31.07″N; 74°14′19.81″W), 6.XI.2019, manual capturado en una bodega, I. Torres leg. (ICN- Ar-9952) GoogleMaps .

Distribution. Known from Colombia, Cundinamarca and Boyacá departments ( Figs 31–32 View FIGURE 31 View FIGURE 32 , 34 View FIGURE 34 ).