Moncharmontia compressa ( De Castro, 1966 )

Simmons, Michael, Bidgood, Michael, Consorti, Lorenzo & Schlagintweit, Felix, 2025, A Review Of The Identity And Biostratigraphy Of Cenomanian “ Larger ” Benthic Foraminifera: Part 2 - The Order Loftusiida (Excluding The Suborder Orbitolinina), Acta Palaeontologica Romaniae 21 (1), pp. 103-192 : 133-134

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.35463/j.apr.2025.01.07

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039B87F9-5A74-FF85-1C82-FC7DFD10FA2E

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Moncharmontia compressa ( De Castro, 1966 )
status

 

Moncharmontia compressa ( De Castro, 1966) View in CoL

Figure 11 View Fig

T 1966 Neoendothyra apenninica compressa De Castro , p. 20, pl. III, figs. 4-8; Turonian-Senonian, Italy.

1967 Moncharmontia compressa De Castro nom. nov., p. 475.

1970 Moncharmontia apenninica compressa – Fleury, pl. 2, figs. 2-3; Senonian, Greece.

? 1972 Moncharmontia apenninica compressa – Bignot, pl. 16, figs. 6-8; Senonian, Croatia [= Fleuryana adriatica De Castro et al. fide De Castro et al., 1994 ].

? 1978 Moncharmontia (?) cf. apenninica compressa – Berthou & Schroeder, pl. 9, fig. 2; late Albian, Portugal [hard to determine if this is Moncharmontia in the random sections presented].

1982 Montcharmontia apenninica compressa (sic) - Altıner & Decrouez, pl. 7, fig. 8; Senonian, Turkish Taurides.

1985 Moncharmontia apenninica – Bilotte, p. 369, pl. 15, fig. 9; late Santonian, Pyrenees.

1994 Moncharmontia compressa – Chiocchini et al., pl. 23, figs. 2-3, 10; early Senonian, central Italy.

2001 Moncharmontia compressa – Cvetko Tešović et al., fig. 7(N); Coniacian-Campanian, Croatia.

2006 Moncharmontia compressa – Taslı et al., fig. 7(JK); Coniacian-Santonian, Türkiye.

2006 Moncharmontia apenninica – Sari, pl. 6.3, figs. 4?, 5, 6?; late Cenomanian – Turonian; Turkish Taurides [late Cenomanian age judged as plausible].

2008 Moncharmontia apenninica – Schlüter, fig. 2.3k; Campanian, southern Italy.

2008 Moncharmontia apenninica – Schlüter et al., fig. 3k; Campanian, southern Italy.

2009 Moncharmontia apenninica - compressa – Sari et al., pl. 4, figs. 4-?5; Turonian-Coniacian, Turkish Taurides.

2011 Moncharmontia compressa – Jez et al., fig. 7g; Coniacian-Santonian, Slovenia.

? 2012 Moncharmontia cf. compressa – Korbar et al., fig. 5M, Turonian, Croatia [age partly based on presence of M. compressa ].

? 2012 Moncharmontia apenninica – Ghanem et al., fig. 6d (11, 19); early Cenomanian, Syria.

? 2017 Moncharmontia (?) sp. – Solak et al., fig. 8(M-N); middle – late Cenomanian, Turkish Taurides [or = Biconcava bentori ].

? 2020 Fleuryana adriatica De Castro et al. 1994 – Solak et al., fig. 14(A-E); Turonian, Turkish Taurides.

2021 Moncharmontia compressa – Sinanoğlu, pl. 1, fig. 9; Maastrichtian, Türkiye.

2023 Moncharmontia compressa – Simmons & Bidgood, p. 77, fig. 27; early Cenomanian?-Maastrichtian, global review.

Reference Images: Taslı et al. (2006) fig. 7(J-K).

Taxonomy/Identity: A smaller and more laterallycompressed Moncharmontia species compared with M. apenninica and with only a single row of apertural openings. Cvetko Tešović et al. (2001) have provided a comprehensive biometric analysis between the two species, although in random thin-sections separation is difficult and there are forms that appear intermediate between the two.

It is very similar to the genus Fleuryana , especially F. adriatica De Castro , which has a single aperture, rather than multiple apertural openings. Records of F. adriatica from the Turonian of Türkiye by Solak et al. (2020), are virtually indistinguishable from M. compressa . F. adriatica is also long-ranging and further work is needed to establish the degree of separation of these two taxa. Differences are discussed by Solak & Taslı (2024).

Simmons & Bidgood (2023) further discuss the differences between the two Moncharmontia species and between them and their two Fleuryana counterparts.

Confident Stratigraphic Range: Turonian – Maastrichtian (scarce in the Maastrichtian).

Uncertain Stratigraphic Range: late Cenomanian.

Commonly regarded as Turonian and younger (e.g., Chiocchini & Mancinelli, 1977). Most plausible, illustrated records of M. compressa are from Turonian and younger (up to Maastrichtian) strata. Cenomanian records are either poorly/equivocally illustrated or not illustrated at all, with the possible exception of that by Sari (2006). The late Albian record of Berthou & Schroeder (1978) is very doubtful, as is the early Cenomanian record of Ghanem et al. (2012). A possible middle – late Cenomanian record ( Solak et al., 2017) as “ Moncharmontia (?) sp.” is unconfirmed. Unillustrated records from the Cenomanian include those from the Natih Formation of Oman by Piuz & Meister (2013) and Piuz et al. (2014).

Geographic Distribution: This species is known from the Mediterranean region ( Italy, Adriatic, Türkiye, Pyrenees) in the post-Cenomanian (although not the Arabian Plate?). In the Cenomanian records are doubtful, but the most probable is from the Turkish Taurides.

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF