Pseudopronematulus duffelensis De Vis & Ueckermann, 2024

Figure 4 a–d Duoparus hyeresensis De Vis & Ueckermann n. gen. n. sp. holotype: a – aspidosoma, b – posterior region of dorsum, c – area anterior to ag1with transversal spindle-shaped striae (within ellipse), d – genital area with two agsetae; e–g Pseudopronematulus duffelensis De Vis & Ueckermann n. sp.: e – aspidosoma, f – posterior region of dorsum (caption = lateral view of dome-shaped excrescence), g – genital

Figure 5 Comparison of setae of different species: a–d tc″ζ of respectively Duoparus hyeresensis De Vis & Ueckermannn. gen. n. sp., Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp., Pseudopronematulus tocantinsensisDe Vis, Castilho & Ueckermann n. sp. and Pseudopronematulus tenuisetosus(Meyer & Rodrigues, 1966) n. comb.; e–g bo, h–j f1 and k–m f2 of respectively Duoparus hyeresensis De Vis & Ueckermann n. gen. n. sp., Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp. and Pseudopronematulus tocantinsensisDe Vis, Castilho & Ueckermann n. sp.

Figure 6 Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp., dorsum (left) and venter (right) of holotype female.

Figure 7 Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp. Female. A – dorsal view of gnathosoma, B – ventral view of gnathosoma, C – palptarsus. Setae or1 indistinguishable;

Figure 8 Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp. legs of holotype female.

Figure 9 Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp. deutonymph dorsum with dehiscence line on aspidosoma (left) and tritonymph venter (right)

Figure 10 Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp. deutonymph venter (left) and protonymph venter (right).