Rhizoctonia terrigena (Bres.) Oberw. et al.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.3114/persoonia.2025.54.09 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16877704 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A69C14-FF80-FF80-FFE3-F9CF659A4B0A |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Rhizoctonia terrigena (Bres.) Oberw. et al. |
status |
|
Rhizoctonia terrigena (Bres.) Oberw. et al. View in CoL , Mycol. Progr. 12 (4): 775. 2013.
Basionym: Corticium terrigenum Bres., Ann. Mycol. 1 (2): 99. 1903.
Synonyms: Ceratobasidium terrigenum (Bres.) Wakef., View in CoL Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 35 (1): 64. 1952.
Hydrabasidium terrigenum (Bres.) Park.-Rhodes, View in CoL Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 37 (4): 325. 1954, nom. inval. ( Table 3 View Table 3 ).
Cejpomyces terrigenus (Bres.) Svrček & Pouzar, View in CoL Česká Mykol. 24 (1): 6. 1970.
Thanatephorus terrigenus (Bres.) View in CoL G. Langer, Biblioth. Mycol. 158: 324. 1994.
Type citation: ‘Hab. ad terram, augusto.’ [‘On soil, August.’]. Roberts (1999) cites ‘B. Eichler, S’ as holotype.
Notes: Parker-Rhodes (1954) believed that R. terrigena (or Cb. terrigenum at the time) was best placed outside of Ceratobasidium based on morphological differences from the type of the name Ceratobasidium , Cb. calosporum . Consequently, Parker-Rhodes attempted to erect the genus Hydrabasidium to accommodate this taxon; however, due to a lack of description or diagnosis for this proposed genus name, the name is invalid (Art. 38.1) ( Eriksson et al. 1978). Thus, the intended combination “ Hydrabasidium terrigenum (Bres.) Park.-Rhodes ” is also invalid (Art. 35.1). Eriksson et al. (1978) later validated the name Hydrabasidium as Hydrabasidium Parker-Rhodes ex Erikss. & Ryv. , albeit with Hypochnus subviolaceus Peck designated as the type for this name [as Hydrabasidium subviolaceum (Peck) Erikss. & Ryv ], without mention of Hydrabasidium terrigenum . Hydrabasidium subviolaceum was transferred to Scotomyces by Jülich (1979), making Hydrabasidium a synonym of Scotomyces . Notably, Hydrabasidium and Scotomyces share the exact same date of publication, December 28, 1978, and therefore the choice by Jülich (1979) to adopt Scotomyces over Hydrabasidium establishes the priority of the former name (Art. 11.5.).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Rhizoctonia terrigena (Bres.) Oberw. et al.
O’Donnell, R. P., Linde, C. C. & May, T. W. 2025 |
Rhizoctonia terrigena (Bres.)
Bres. 2013: 775 |
Hydrabasidium terrigenum (Bres.) Park.-Rhodes,
Rhodes 1954: 325 |
Ceratobasidium terrigenum (Bres.) Wakef.,
Wakef. 1952: 64 |
Corticium terrigenum Bres.,
Bres. 1903: 99 |
Cejpomyces terrigenus (Bres.) Svrček & Pouzar,
Cejpomyces terrigenus (Bres.) Svrček & Pouzar, Česká Mykol . 24 (1): 6. 1970. |
Thanatephorus terrigenus (Bres.)
G. Langer, Biblioth. Mycol. 158 : 324. 1994. |